evaluating the acutely dizzy patientdepts.washington.edu/uwmedres/program/conferences/... ·...

30
Evaluating the acutely dizzy patient Patricia Oakes, MD UWMC Department of Neurology

Upload: others

Post on 01-Aug-2020

11 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evaluating the acutely dizzy patientdepts.washington.edu/uwmedres/program/conferences/... · vestibular nystagmusthat is suppressed by visual fixation, and is unstable but can still

Evaluating the acutely dizzy patient

Patricia Oakes MD

UWMC Department of Neurology

Dizziness the problem

bull Common complaint 75 million patients yearly in ambulatory settings

bull Etiology usually benign but could be life-threatening

bull Large multi-hospital study in TX ndash StrokeTIA diagnosed in 32 of patients presenting

to the ED with chief complaint of dizziness

ndash Of the 46 validated strokes 16 misdiagnosed in ED (35) Kerber et al Stroke 2006

The dizzy patient history

Question 1 Characterize the dizziness-Light-headed (like I could pass out)-Disequilibrium (unsteady on my feet)-Vertigo feeling of movement (spinning tilting)

Not helpfullike I need to grab onto somethinglike I need to sit down gets worse with movement

Helpful comes on when I stand up comes on when I move my head

Peripheral vs Central

bull Peripheralndash Vestibular neuritisndash Labyrinthitisndash Menierersquosndash BPPV

bull Centralndash Posterior circulation infarct

bull Inferior cerebellumbull Brainstem (other neurologic findings)bull Superior cerebellum (ataxia dysarthria more prominent than vertigo)

ndash Other (MS migraine infection )bull As many as 25 of patients with risk factors for stroke who present

to an ED with isolated severe vertigo nystagmus and postural instability have an infarction of the inferior cerebellum NEJM 1998 ActaNeurol Scand 1995

Clemente Anatomy

Acute Vestibular SyndromeJohn R Hotson MD and Robert W Baloh MDN Engl J Med 1998 339680-685September 3 1998etic Resonance Image of a Right Inferior Cerebellar Infarction in a Man with Acute Vertigo Vomiting Nystagmus

Elicited by Right Left or Upward Gaze and Severe Gait Instability

Hotson JR Baloh RW N Engl J Med 1998339680-685

Edlow et al Lancet Neurol 2008

Edlow et al Lancet Neurol 2008

Edlow et al Lancet Neurol 2008

SCA Limb andor trunk ataxia dysarthria

AICA acute vestibular syndrome hearing loss

PICA acute vestibular syndrome

Each can also have NV and associated brainstem signs

Why diagnose stroke1-acute treatment2-prevent further events

3 of strokes =20000 yearly in the US Edlow NEJM 2008

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 2 onset of vertigo

bull Question 3 duration of vertigo

bull Question 4 accompanying symptoms

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 2 onset of vertigo

bull Question 3 duration of vertigo

bull Question 4 accompanying symptomsndash Nausea vomiting (not very helpful)

ndash Tinnitus hearing loss

ndash Headache

ndash Weakness numbness

ndash Swallowing difficulty hiccups hoarseness

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 5 stroke risk factorsndash Prior strokeTIA Hypertension Diabetes

hyperlipidemia atrial-fibrillation smoking age

ndash Hemorrhagic CVA risk factors (meds)

ndash Other Cocaine use trauma stroke-prone disease (Lupus Hyper-coaguable state)

Etiology of peripheral vertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Vestibular neuritis

Acute vsevolves over hours

Days to weeks

No NV unsteadinessTinnitus +-

Labyrinthitis Acute vsevolves over hours

Days to weeks

Yes NV unsteadinessTinnitus +-

BPPV Acute Intermittent brief seconds

No N unsteadiness

Menierersquos disease

Acute Hours Maybe NV unsteadiness tinnitus +-

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellarinfarct PICA

Acute days-yrs no NV falls

Cerebellar infarctAICA

Acute days-yrs yes NV falls

Brainstem infarct Acute days-yrs no many

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellarinfarct PICA

Acute days-yrs no NV falls

Cerebellar infarctAICA

Acute days-yrs yes NV falls

Brainstem infarct Acute days-yrs no many

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellar TIAPICA

Acute minutes no NV falls

Cerebellar TIAAICA

Acute minutes yes NV falls

Brainstem TIA Acute minutes no many

Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus

bull Horizontal vs vertical

bull Direction ndash characterize it by the fast component

bull Does the direction change depending on direction of gaze

Vertigo exam nystagmusCharacteristics of peripheral nystagmus

bull Horizontal

bull Unidirectionalndash Fast phase always in same

direction

bull Improves with fixation

bull Worsens with removing fixation ndash Ophthalmoscope cover

fixating eye

Characteristics of central nystagmus

bull Horizontal or vertical or purely torsional

bull Uni or multi-directionalndash Fast phase may change with

direction of gaze

bull Does not improve with fixation

bull No change with removing fixation

What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic

bull Perform Hallpike Dix manuver to try to trigger nystagmus

bull Consider head thrust test correctional saccade is a sign of peripheral lesion

Vertigo exam gait

bull Peripheral vertigo patient leansveers toward side of lesion may fall this way on Romberg testingndash Instruct patient to falllean in the direction they feel

like fallingleaning (rather than compensating)ndash ldquounidirectional postural instability with preserved

walkingrdquo Hotson et al NEJM 1998

bull Central vertigondash often canrsquot walk without fallingndash May leanfall in more than one direction

Vertigo Exam other findings

bull Cranial nervesndash 2 funduscopic exam disc edema

pupils Hornerrsquosndash 3 Skew deviation (vertical misalignment) extraocular movements

cover-uncoverVertical smooth pursuit saccadic interruptions

ndash 5 impaired pain and temperature (ipsilateral)ndash 7 face weaknessndash 3 6 8 Head thrust test nystagmus ndash 9 10 hoarseness unilateral decreased palate elevation unilateral loss

of gagbull Motor unilateral weaknessbull Sensory impaired pain and temperature classically contralateral to

facebull Coordination impaired finger-nose-finger HKS inability to walk

Pract Neurol201010129-139 doi101136jnnp2010211607 ReviewChronic dizziness a practical approach Bronstein AM et al

+

Exam finding Central lesion Vestibularneuritis

Groupdifference

Vertical saccadicpursuit

88 20 p lt 01

Gaze evokednystagmus

56 17 p lt 01

Skew deviation

40 0 p lt 01

Positive head thrust sign

39 82 plt 01

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008 Apr79(4)458-60Bedside differentiation of vestibular neuritis from central vestibular pseudoneuritis

Cnyrim CD Newman-Toker D Karch C Brandt T Strupp M

Neuro-imaging

bull Head CT will rule out hemorrhagendash Negative head CT does not rule out acute ischemic

stroke

bull Brain MRI is the best study

So who needs an acute work-up

bull No bright line rulebull Factors in favor of acute work-up

ndash stroke risk factors (including age gt50) and acute onset vertigondash Headachendash Additional neurologic complaints (besides nv hearing loss

tinnitus)ndash focal finding on neuro exam

bull Factors in favor of foregoing MRIndash Unidirectional horizontal nystagmus that improves with fixationndash Unilateral hearing loss tinnitus without other neurologic signs ndash ABSENCE OF STROKE RISK FACTORS ndash Absence of focal findings on neuro exam

Approach 1 Forego MRI if

A patient has isolated acute vertigo peripheral vestibular nystagmus that is suppressed by visual fixation and is unstable but can still walk ok to defer MRI for 48 hours Substantial improvement in 48 hours is consistent with vestibular neuritis and brain imaging is not necessary Hotson et al NEJM 1998

Approach 2Obtain MRI if

1-acute or subacute onset of prolonged vertigo and postural imbalance and2-horizontal spontaneous nystagmus 3-AND one or more of the following

ndash Skew deviationndash Gaze evoked nystagmus (opposite to the direction of

spontaneous nystagmus)ndash Vertical saccadic pursuitndash Normal head thrust test ORndash Severe or multiple vascular risk factorsCnyrim et al J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2008

Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology

bull Cardio-embolic

bull Large vessel atherosclerosis

bull Vertebral artery dissection (especially in young patients)

bull Small vessel disease

bull Artery-artery embolismbull Hypercoaguable states vasculitis venous sinus thrombosis acute cocaine use

Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient

bull History

1-characterize the dizziness

2-onset of vertigo

3-duration of vertigo

4-accompanying symptoms

5-stroke risk factors

bull Exam

-Characterize nystagmus

-Gait

-Other neurologic findings

-add to your repertoire

-head thrust test

-vertical pursuit

-skew deviation

  • Evaluating the acutely dizzy patient
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Dizziness the problem
  • The dizzy patient history
  • Peripheral vs Central
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus
  • Vertigo exam nystagmus
  • What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic
  • Vertigo exam gait
  • Vertigo Exam other findings
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Neuro-imaging
  • So who needs an acute work-up
  • Approach 1 Forego MRI if
  • Approach 2Obtain MRI if
  • Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology
  • Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient
Page 2: Evaluating the acutely dizzy patientdepts.washington.edu/uwmedres/program/conferences/... · vestibular nystagmusthat is suppressed by visual fixation, and is unstable but can still

Dizziness the problem

bull Common complaint 75 million patients yearly in ambulatory settings

bull Etiology usually benign but could be life-threatening

bull Large multi-hospital study in TX ndash StrokeTIA diagnosed in 32 of patients presenting

to the ED with chief complaint of dizziness

ndash Of the 46 validated strokes 16 misdiagnosed in ED (35) Kerber et al Stroke 2006

The dizzy patient history

Question 1 Characterize the dizziness-Light-headed (like I could pass out)-Disequilibrium (unsteady on my feet)-Vertigo feeling of movement (spinning tilting)

Not helpfullike I need to grab onto somethinglike I need to sit down gets worse with movement

Helpful comes on when I stand up comes on when I move my head

Peripheral vs Central

bull Peripheralndash Vestibular neuritisndash Labyrinthitisndash Menierersquosndash BPPV

bull Centralndash Posterior circulation infarct

bull Inferior cerebellumbull Brainstem (other neurologic findings)bull Superior cerebellum (ataxia dysarthria more prominent than vertigo)

ndash Other (MS migraine infection )bull As many as 25 of patients with risk factors for stroke who present

to an ED with isolated severe vertigo nystagmus and postural instability have an infarction of the inferior cerebellum NEJM 1998 ActaNeurol Scand 1995

Clemente Anatomy

Acute Vestibular SyndromeJohn R Hotson MD and Robert W Baloh MDN Engl J Med 1998 339680-685September 3 1998etic Resonance Image of a Right Inferior Cerebellar Infarction in a Man with Acute Vertigo Vomiting Nystagmus

Elicited by Right Left or Upward Gaze and Severe Gait Instability

Hotson JR Baloh RW N Engl J Med 1998339680-685

Edlow et al Lancet Neurol 2008

Edlow et al Lancet Neurol 2008

Edlow et al Lancet Neurol 2008

SCA Limb andor trunk ataxia dysarthria

AICA acute vestibular syndrome hearing loss

PICA acute vestibular syndrome

Each can also have NV and associated brainstem signs

Why diagnose stroke1-acute treatment2-prevent further events

3 of strokes =20000 yearly in the US Edlow NEJM 2008

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 2 onset of vertigo

bull Question 3 duration of vertigo

bull Question 4 accompanying symptoms

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 2 onset of vertigo

bull Question 3 duration of vertigo

bull Question 4 accompanying symptomsndash Nausea vomiting (not very helpful)

ndash Tinnitus hearing loss

ndash Headache

ndash Weakness numbness

ndash Swallowing difficulty hiccups hoarseness

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 5 stroke risk factorsndash Prior strokeTIA Hypertension Diabetes

hyperlipidemia atrial-fibrillation smoking age

ndash Hemorrhagic CVA risk factors (meds)

ndash Other Cocaine use trauma stroke-prone disease (Lupus Hyper-coaguable state)

Etiology of peripheral vertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Vestibular neuritis

Acute vsevolves over hours

Days to weeks

No NV unsteadinessTinnitus +-

Labyrinthitis Acute vsevolves over hours

Days to weeks

Yes NV unsteadinessTinnitus +-

BPPV Acute Intermittent brief seconds

No N unsteadiness

Menierersquos disease

Acute Hours Maybe NV unsteadiness tinnitus +-

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellarinfarct PICA

Acute days-yrs no NV falls

Cerebellar infarctAICA

Acute days-yrs yes NV falls

Brainstem infarct Acute days-yrs no many

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellarinfarct PICA

Acute days-yrs no NV falls

Cerebellar infarctAICA

Acute days-yrs yes NV falls

Brainstem infarct Acute days-yrs no many

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellar TIAPICA

Acute minutes no NV falls

Cerebellar TIAAICA

Acute minutes yes NV falls

Brainstem TIA Acute minutes no many

Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus

bull Horizontal vs vertical

bull Direction ndash characterize it by the fast component

bull Does the direction change depending on direction of gaze

Vertigo exam nystagmusCharacteristics of peripheral nystagmus

bull Horizontal

bull Unidirectionalndash Fast phase always in same

direction

bull Improves with fixation

bull Worsens with removing fixation ndash Ophthalmoscope cover

fixating eye

Characteristics of central nystagmus

bull Horizontal or vertical or purely torsional

bull Uni or multi-directionalndash Fast phase may change with

direction of gaze

bull Does not improve with fixation

bull No change with removing fixation

What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic

bull Perform Hallpike Dix manuver to try to trigger nystagmus

bull Consider head thrust test correctional saccade is a sign of peripheral lesion

Vertigo exam gait

bull Peripheral vertigo patient leansveers toward side of lesion may fall this way on Romberg testingndash Instruct patient to falllean in the direction they feel

like fallingleaning (rather than compensating)ndash ldquounidirectional postural instability with preserved

walkingrdquo Hotson et al NEJM 1998

bull Central vertigondash often canrsquot walk without fallingndash May leanfall in more than one direction

Vertigo Exam other findings

bull Cranial nervesndash 2 funduscopic exam disc edema

pupils Hornerrsquosndash 3 Skew deviation (vertical misalignment) extraocular movements

cover-uncoverVertical smooth pursuit saccadic interruptions

ndash 5 impaired pain and temperature (ipsilateral)ndash 7 face weaknessndash 3 6 8 Head thrust test nystagmus ndash 9 10 hoarseness unilateral decreased palate elevation unilateral loss

of gagbull Motor unilateral weaknessbull Sensory impaired pain and temperature classically contralateral to

facebull Coordination impaired finger-nose-finger HKS inability to walk

Pract Neurol201010129-139 doi101136jnnp2010211607 ReviewChronic dizziness a practical approach Bronstein AM et al

+

Exam finding Central lesion Vestibularneuritis

Groupdifference

Vertical saccadicpursuit

88 20 p lt 01

Gaze evokednystagmus

56 17 p lt 01

Skew deviation

40 0 p lt 01

Positive head thrust sign

39 82 plt 01

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008 Apr79(4)458-60Bedside differentiation of vestibular neuritis from central vestibular pseudoneuritis

Cnyrim CD Newman-Toker D Karch C Brandt T Strupp M

Neuro-imaging

bull Head CT will rule out hemorrhagendash Negative head CT does not rule out acute ischemic

stroke

bull Brain MRI is the best study

So who needs an acute work-up

bull No bright line rulebull Factors in favor of acute work-up

ndash stroke risk factors (including age gt50) and acute onset vertigondash Headachendash Additional neurologic complaints (besides nv hearing loss

tinnitus)ndash focal finding on neuro exam

bull Factors in favor of foregoing MRIndash Unidirectional horizontal nystagmus that improves with fixationndash Unilateral hearing loss tinnitus without other neurologic signs ndash ABSENCE OF STROKE RISK FACTORS ndash Absence of focal findings on neuro exam

Approach 1 Forego MRI if

A patient has isolated acute vertigo peripheral vestibular nystagmus that is suppressed by visual fixation and is unstable but can still walk ok to defer MRI for 48 hours Substantial improvement in 48 hours is consistent with vestibular neuritis and brain imaging is not necessary Hotson et al NEJM 1998

Approach 2Obtain MRI if

1-acute or subacute onset of prolonged vertigo and postural imbalance and2-horizontal spontaneous nystagmus 3-AND one or more of the following

ndash Skew deviationndash Gaze evoked nystagmus (opposite to the direction of

spontaneous nystagmus)ndash Vertical saccadic pursuitndash Normal head thrust test ORndash Severe or multiple vascular risk factorsCnyrim et al J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2008

Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology

bull Cardio-embolic

bull Large vessel atherosclerosis

bull Vertebral artery dissection (especially in young patients)

bull Small vessel disease

bull Artery-artery embolismbull Hypercoaguable states vasculitis venous sinus thrombosis acute cocaine use

Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient

bull History

1-characterize the dizziness

2-onset of vertigo

3-duration of vertigo

4-accompanying symptoms

5-stroke risk factors

bull Exam

-Characterize nystagmus

-Gait

-Other neurologic findings

-add to your repertoire

-head thrust test

-vertical pursuit

-skew deviation

  • Evaluating the acutely dizzy patient
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Dizziness the problem
  • The dizzy patient history
  • Peripheral vs Central
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus
  • Vertigo exam nystagmus
  • What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic
  • Vertigo exam gait
  • Vertigo Exam other findings
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Neuro-imaging
  • So who needs an acute work-up
  • Approach 1 Forego MRI if
  • Approach 2Obtain MRI if
  • Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology
  • Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient
Page 3: Evaluating the acutely dizzy patientdepts.washington.edu/uwmedres/program/conferences/... · vestibular nystagmusthat is suppressed by visual fixation, and is unstable but can still

The dizzy patient history

Question 1 Characterize the dizziness-Light-headed (like I could pass out)-Disequilibrium (unsteady on my feet)-Vertigo feeling of movement (spinning tilting)

Not helpfullike I need to grab onto somethinglike I need to sit down gets worse with movement

Helpful comes on when I stand up comes on when I move my head

Peripheral vs Central

bull Peripheralndash Vestibular neuritisndash Labyrinthitisndash Menierersquosndash BPPV

bull Centralndash Posterior circulation infarct

bull Inferior cerebellumbull Brainstem (other neurologic findings)bull Superior cerebellum (ataxia dysarthria more prominent than vertigo)

ndash Other (MS migraine infection )bull As many as 25 of patients with risk factors for stroke who present

to an ED with isolated severe vertigo nystagmus and postural instability have an infarction of the inferior cerebellum NEJM 1998 ActaNeurol Scand 1995

Clemente Anatomy

Acute Vestibular SyndromeJohn R Hotson MD and Robert W Baloh MDN Engl J Med 1998 339680-685September 3 1998etic Resonance Image of a Right Inferior Cerebellar Infarction in a Man with Acute Vertigo Vomiting Nystagmus

Elicited by Right Left or Upward Gaze and Severe Gait Instability

Hotson JR Baloh RW N Engl J Med 1998339680-685

Edlow et al Lancet Neurol 2008

Edlow et al Lancet Neurol 2008

Edlow et al Lancet Neurol 2008

SCA Limb andor trunk ataxia dysarthria

AICA acute vestibular syndrome hearing loss

PICA acute vestibular syndrome

Each can also have NV and associated brainstem signs

Why diagnose stroke1-acute treatment2-prevent further events

3 of strokes =20000 yearly in the US Edlow NEJM 2008

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 2 onset of vertigo

bull Question 3 duration of vertigo

bull Question 4 accompanying symptoms

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 2 onset of vertigo

bull Question 3 duration of vertigo

bull Question 4 accompanying symptomsndash Nausea vomiting (not very helpful)

ndash Tinnitus hearing loss

ndash Headache

ndash Weakness numbness

ndash Swallowing difficulty hiccups hoarseness

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 5 stroke risk factorsndash Prior strokeTIA Hypertension Diabetes

hyperlipidemia atrial-fibrillation smoking age

ndash Hemorrhagic CVA risk factors (meds)

ndash Other Cocaine use trauma stroke-prone disease (Lupus Hyper-coaguable state)

Etiology of peripheral vertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Vestibular neuritis

Acute vsevolves over hours

Days to weeks

No NV unsteadinessTinnitus +-

Labyrinthitis Acute vsevolves over hours

Days to weeks

Yes NV unsteadinessTinnitus +-

BPPV Acute Intermittent brief seconds

No N unsteadiness

Menierersquos disease

Acute Hours Maybe NV unsteadiness tinnitus +-

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellarinfarct PICA

Acute days-yrs no NV falls

Cerebellar infarctAICA

Acute days-yrs yes NV falls

Brainstem infarct Acute days-yrs no many

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellarinfarct PICA

Acute days-yrs no NV falls

Cerebellar infarctAICA

Acute days-yrs yes NV falls

Brainstem infarct Acute days-yrs no many

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellar TIAPICA

Acute minutes no NV falls

Cerebellar TIAAICA

Acute minutes yes NV falls

Brainstem TIA Acute minutes no many

Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus

bull Horizontal vs vertical

bull Direction ndash characterize it by the fast component

bull Does the direction change depending on direction of gaze

Vertigo exam nystagmusCharacteristics of peripheral nystagmus

bull Horizontal

bull Unidirectionalndash Fast phase always in same

direction

bull Improves with fixation

bull Worsens with removing fixation ndash Ophthalmoscope cover

fixating eye

Characteristics of central nystagmus

bull Horizontal or vertical or purely torsional

bull Uni or multi-directionalndash Fast phase may change with

direction of gaze

bull Does not improve with fixation

bull No change with removing fixation

What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic

bull Perform Hallpike Dix manuver to try to trigger nystagmus

bull Consider head thrust test correctional saccade is a sign of peripheral lesion

Vertigo exam gait

bull Peripheral vertigo patient leansveers toward side of lesion may fall this way on Romberg testingndash Instruct patient to falllean in the direction they feel

like fallingleaning (rather than compensating)ndash ldquounidirectional postural instability with preserved

walkingrdquo Hotson et al NEJM 1998

bull Central vertigondash often canrsquot walk without fallingndash May leanfall in more than one direction

Vertigo Exam other findings

bull Cranial nervesndash 2 funduscopic exam disc edema

pupils Hornerrsquosndash 3 Skew deviation (vertical misalignment) extraocular movements

cover-uncoverVertical smooth pursuit saccadic interruptions

ndash 5 impaired pain and temperature (ipsilateral)ndash 7 face weaknessndash 3 6 8 Head thrust test nystagmus ndash 9 10 hoarseness unilateral decreased palate elevation unilateral loss

of gagbull Motor unilateral weaknessbull Sensory impaired pain and temperature classically contralateral to

facebull Coordination impaired finger-nose-finger HKS inability to walk

Pract Neurol201010129-139 doi101136jnnp2010211607 ReviewChronic dizziness a practical approach Bronstein AM et al

+

Exam finding Central lesion Vestibularneuritis

Groupdifference

Vertical saccadicpursuit

88 20 p lt 01

Gaze evokednystagmus

56 17 p lt 01

Skew deviation

40 0 p lt 01

Positive head thrust sign

39 82 plt 01

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008 Apr79(4)458-60Bedside differentiation of vestibular neuritis from central vestibular pseudoneuritis

Cnyrim CD Newman-Toker D Karch C Brandt T Strupp M

Neuro-imaging

bull Head CT will rule out hemorrhagendash Negative head CT does not rule out acute ischemic

stroke

bull Brain MRI is the best study

So who needs an acute work-up

bull No bright line rulebull Factors in favor of acute work-up

ndash stroke risk factors (including age gt50) and acute onset vertigondash Headachendash Additional neurologic complaints (besides nv hearing loss

tinnitus)ndash focal finding on neuro exam

bull Factors in favor of foregoing MRIndash Unidirectional horizontal nystagmus that improves with fixationndash Unilateral hearing loss tinnitus without other neurologic signs ndash ABSENCE OF STROKE RISK FACTORS ndash Absence of focal findings on neuro exam

Approach 1 Forego MRI if

A patient has isolated acute vertigo peripheral vestibular nystagmus that is suppressed by visual fixation and is unstable but can still walk ok to defer MRI for 48 hours Substantial improvement in 48 hours is consistent with vestibular neuritis and brain imaging is not necessary Hotson et al NEJM 1998

Approach 2Obtain MRI if

1-acute or subacute onset of prolonged vertigo and postural imbalance and2-horizontal spontaneous nystagmus 3-AND one or more of the following

ndash Skew deviationndash Gaze evoked nystagmus (opposite to the direction of

spontaneous nystagmus)ndash Vertical saccadic pursuitndash Normal head thrust test ORndash Severe or multiple vascular risk factorsCnyrim et al J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2008

Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology

bull Cardio-embolic

bull Large vessel atherosclerosis

bull Vertebral artery dissection (especially in young patients)

bull Small vessel disease

bull Artery-artery embolismbull Hypercoaguable states vasculitis venous sinus thrombosis acute cocaine use

Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient

bull History

1-characterize the dizziness

2-onset of vertigo

3-duration of vertigo

4-accompanying symptoms

5-stroke risk factors

bull Exam

-Characterize nystagmus

-Gait

-Other neurologic findings

-add to your repertoire

-head thrust test

-vertical pursuit

-skew deviation

  • Evaluating the acutely dizzy patient
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Dizziness the problem
  • The dizzy patient history
  • Peripheral vs Central
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus
  • Vertigo exam nystagmus
  • What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic
  • Vertigo exam gait
  • Vertigo Exam other findings
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Neuro-imaging
  • So who needs an acute work-up
  • Approach 1 Forego MRI if
  • Approach 2Obtain MRI if
  • Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology
  • Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient
Page 4: Evaluating the acutely dizzy patientdepts.washington.edu/uwmedres/program/conferences/... · vestibular nystagmusthat is suppressed by visual fixation, and is unstable but can still

Peripheral vs Central

bull Peripheralndash Vestibular neuritisndash Labyrinthitisndash Menierersquosndash BPPV

bull Centralndash Posterior circulation infarct

bull Inferior cerebellumbull Brainstem (other neurologic findings)bull Superior cerebellum (ataxia dysarthria more prominent than vertigo)

ndash Other (MS migraine infection )bull As many as 25 of patients with risk factors for stroke who present

to an ED with isolated severe vertigo nystagmus and postural instability have an infarction of the inferior cerebellum NEJM 1998 ActaNeurol Scand 1995

Clemente Anatomy

Acute Vestibular SyndromeJohn R Hotson MD and Robert W Baloh MDN Engl J Med 1998 339680-685September 3 1998etic Resonance Image of a Right Inferior Cerebellar Infarction in a Man with Acute Vertigo Vomiting Nystagmus

Elicited by Right Left or Upward Gaze and Severe Gait Instability

Hotson JR Baloh RW N Engl J Med 1998339680-685

Edlow et al Lancet Neurol 2008

Edlow et al Lancet Neurol 2008

Edlow et al Lancet Neurol 2008

SCA Limb andor trunk ataxia dysarthria

AICA acute vestibular syndrome hearing loss

PICA acute vestibular syndrome

Each can also have NV and associated brainstem signs

Why diagnose stroke1-acute treatment2-prevent further events

3 of strokes =20000 yearly in the US Edlow NEJM 2008

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 2 onset of vertigo

bull Question 3 duration of vertigo

bull Question 4 accompanying symptoms

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 2 onset of vertigo

bull Question 3 duration of vertigo

bull Question 4 accompanying symptomsndash Nausea vomiting (not very helpful)

ndash Tinnitus hearing loss

ndash Headache

ndash Weakness numbness

ndash Swallowing difficulty hiccups hoarseness

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 5 stroke risk factorsndash Prior strokeTIA Hypertension Diabetes

hyperlipidemia atrial-fibrillation smoking age

ndash Hemorrhagic CVA risk factors (meds)

ndash Other Cocaine use trauma stroke-prone disease (Lupus Hyper-coaguable state)

Etiology of peripheral vertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Vestibular neuritis

Acute vsevolves over hours

Days to weeks

No NV unsteadinessTinnitus +-

Labyrinthitis Acute vsevolves over hours

Days to weeks

Yes NV unsteadinessTinnitus +-

BPPV Acute Intermittent brief seconds

No N unsteadiness

Menierersquos disease

Acute Hours Maybe NV unsteadiness tinnitus +-

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellarinfarct PICA

Acute days-yrs no NV falls

Cerebellar infarctAICA

Acute days-yrs yes NV falls

Brainstem infarct Acute days-yrs no many

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellarinfarct PICA

Acute days-yrs no NV falls

Cerebellar infarctAICA

Acute days-yrs yes NV falls

Brainstem infarct Acute days-yrs no many

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellar TIAPICA

Acute minutes no NV falls

Cerebellar TIAAICA

Acute minutes yes NV falls

Brainstem TIA Acute minutes no many

Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus

bull Horizontal vs vertical

bull Direction ndash characterize it by the fast component

bull Does the direction change depending on direction of gaze

Vertigo exam nystagmusCharacteristics of peripheral nystagmus

bull Horizontal

bull Unidirectionalndash Fast phase always in same

direction

bull Improves with fixation

bull Worsens with removing fixation ndash Ophthalmoscope cover

fixating eye

Characteristics of central nystagmus

bull Horizontal or vertical or purely torsional

bull Uni or multi-directionalndash Fast phase may change with

direction of gaze

bull Does not improve with fixation

bull No change with removing fixation

What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic

bull Perform Hallpike Dix manuver to try to trigger nystagmus

bull Consider head thrust test correctional saccade is a sign of peripheral lesion

Vertigo exam gait

bull Peripheral vertigo patient leansveers toward side of lesion may fall this way on Romberg testingndash Instruct patient to falllean in the direction they feel

like fallingleaning (rather than compensating)ndash ldquounidirectional postural instability with preserved

walkingrdquo Hotson et al NEJM 1998

bull Central vertigondash often canrsquot walk without fallingndash May leanfall in more than one direction

Vertigo Exam other findings

bull Cranial nervesndash 2 funduscopic exam disc edema

pupils Hornerrsquosndash 3 Skew deviation (vertical misalignment) extraocular movements

cover-uncoverVertical smooth pursuit saccadic interruptions

ndash 5 impaired pain and temperature (ipsilateral)ndash 7 face weaknessndash 3 6 8 Head thrust test nystagmus ndash 9 10 hoarseness unilateral decreased palate elevation unilateral loss

of gagbull Motor unilateral weaknessbull Sensory impaired pain and temperature classically contralateral to

facebull Coordination impaired finger-nose-finger HKS inability to walk

Pract Neurol201010129-139 doi101136jnnp2010211607 ReviewChronic dizziness a practical approach Bronstein AM et al

+

Exam finding Central lesion Vestibularneuritis

Groupdifference

Vertical saccadicpursuit

88 20 p lt 01

Gaze evokednystagmus

56 17 p lt 01

Skew deviation

40 0 p lt 01

Positive head thrust sign

39 82 plt 01

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008 Apr79(4)458-60Bedside differentiation of vestibular neuritis from central vestibular pseudoneuritis

Cnyrim CD Newman-Toker D Karch C Brandt T Strupp M

Neuro-imaging

bull Head CT will rule out hemorrhagendash Negative head CT does not rule out acute ischemic

stroke

bull Brain MRI is the best study

So who needs an acute work-up

bull No bright line rulebull Factors in favor of acute work-up

ndash stroke risk factors (including age gt50) and acute onset vertigondash Headachendash Additional neurologic complaints (besides nv hearing loss

tinnitus)ndash focal finding on neuro exam

bull Factors in favor of foregoing MRIndash Unidirectional horizontal nystagmus that improves with fixationndash Unilateral hearing loss tinnitus without other neurologic signs ndash ABSENCE OF STROKE RISK FACTORS ndash Absence of focal findings on neuro exam

Approach 1 Forego MRI if

A patient has isolated acute vertigo peripheral vestibular nystagmus that is suppressed by visual fixation and is unstable but can still walk ok to defer MRI for 48 hours Substantial improvement in 48 hours is consistent with vestibular neuritis and brain imaging is not necessary Hotson et al NEJM 1998

Approach 2Obtain MRI if

1-acute or subacute onset of prolonged vertigo and postural imbalance and2-horizontal spontaneous nystagmus 3-AND one or more of the following

ndash Skew deviationndash Gaze evoked nystagmus (opposite to the direction of

spontaneous nystagmus)ndash Vertical saccadic pursuitndash Normal head thrust test ORndash Severe or multiple vascular risk factorsCnyrim et al J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2008

Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology

bull Cardio-embolic

bull Large vessel atherosclerosis

bull Vertebral artery dissection (especially in young patients)

bull Small vessel disease

bull Artery-artery embolismbull Hypercoaguable states vasculitis venous sinus thrombosis acute cocaine use

Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient

bull History

1-characterize the dizziness

2-onset of vertigo

3-duration of vertigo

4-accompanying symptoms

5-stroke risk factors

bull Exam

-Characterize nystagmus

-Gait

-Other neurologic findings

-add to your repertoire

-head thrust test

-vertical pursuit

-skew deviation

  • Evaluating the acutely dizzy patient
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Dizziness the problem
  • The dizzy patient history
  • Peripheral vs Central
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus
  • Vertigo exam nystagmus
  • What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic
  • Vertigo exam gait
  • Vertigo Exam other findings
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Neuro-imaging
  • So who needs an acute work-up
  • Approach 1 Forego MRI if
  • Approach 2Obtain MRI if
  • Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology
  • Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient
Page 5: Evaluating the acutely dizzy patientdepts.washington.edu/uwmedres/program/conferences/... · vestibular nystagmusthat is suppressed by visual fixation, and is unstable but can still

Clemente Anatomy

Acute Vestibular SyndromeJohn R Hotson MD and Robert W Baloh MDN Engl J Med 1998 339680-685September 3 1998etic Resonance Image of a Right Inferior Cerebellar Infarction in a Man with Acute Vertigo Vomiting Nystagmus

Elicited by Right Left or Upward Gaze and Severe Gait Instability

Hotson JR Baloh RW N Engl J Med 1998339680-685

Edlow et al Lancet Neurol 2008

Edlow et al Lancet Neurol 2008

Edlow et al Lancet Neurol 2008

SCA Limb andor trunk ataxia dysarthria

AICA acute vestibular syndrome hearing loss

PICA acute vestibular syndrome

Each can also have NV and associated brainstem signs

Why diagnose stroke1-acute treatment2-prevent further events

3 of strokes =20000 yearly in the US Edlow NEJM 2008

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 2 onset of vertigo

bull Question 3 duration of vertigo

bull Question 4 accompanying symptoms

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 2 onset of vertigo

bull Question 3 duration of vertigo

bull Question 4 accompanying symptomsndash Nausea vomiting (not very helpful)

ndash Tinnitus hearing loss

ndash Headache

ndash Weakness numbness

ndash Swallowing difficulty hiccups hoarseness

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 5 stroke risk factorsndash Prior strokeTIA Hypertension Diabetes

hyperlipidemia atrial-fibrillation smoking age

ndash Hemorrhagic CVA risk factors (meds)

ndash Other Cocaine use trauma stroke-prone disease (Lupus Hyper-coaguable state)

Etiology of peripheral vertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Vestibular neuritis

Acute vsevolves over hours

Days to weeks

No NV unsteadinessTinnitus +-

Labyrinthitis Acute vsevolves over hours

Days to weeks

Yes NV unsteadinessTinnitus +-

BPPV Acute Intermittent brief seconds

No N unsteadiness

Menierersquos disease

Acute Hours Maybe NV unsteadiness tinnitus +-

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellarinfarct PICA

Acute days-yrs no NV falls

Cerebellar infarctAICA

Acute days-yrs yes NV falls

Brainstem infarct Acute days-yrs no many

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellarinfarct PICA

Acute days-yrs no NV falls

Cerebellar infarctAICA

Acute days-yrs yes NV falls

Brainstem infarct Acute days-yrs no many

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellar TIAPICA

Acute minutes no NV falls

Cerebellar TIAAICA

Acute minutes yes NV falls

Brainstem TIA Acute minutes no many

Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus

bull Horizontal vs vertical

bull Direction ndash characterize it by the fast component

bull Does the direction change depending on direction of gaze

Vertigo exam nystagmusCharacteristics of peripheral nystagmus

bull Horizontal

bull Unidirectionalndash Fast phase always in same

direction

bull Improves with fixation

bull Worsens with removing fixation ndash Ophthalmoscope cover

fixating eye

Characteristics of central nystagmus

bull Horizontal or vertical or purely torsional

bull Uni or multi-directionalndash Fast phase may change with

direction of gaze

bull Does not improve with fixation

bull No change with removing fixation

What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic

bull Perform Hallpike Dix manuver to try to trigger nystagmus

bull Consider head thrust test correctional saccade is a sign of peripheral lesion

Vertigo exam gait

bull Peripheral vertigo patient leansveers toward side of lesion may fall this way on Romberg testingndash Instruct patient to falllean in the direction they feel

like fallingleaning (rather than compensating)ndash ldquounidirectional postural instability with preserved

walkingrdquo Hotson et al NEJM 1998

bull Central vertigondash often canrsquot walk without fallingndash May leanfall in more than one direction

Vertigo Exam other findings

bull Cranial nervesndash 2 funduscopic exam disc edema

pupils Hornerrsquosndash 3 Skew deviation (vertical misalignment) extraocular movements

cover-uncoverVertical smooth pursuit saccadic interruptions

ndash 5 impaired pain and temperature (ipsilateral)ndash 7 face weaknessndash 3 6 8 Head thrust test nystagmus ndash 9 10 hoarseness unilateral decreased palate elevation unilateral loss

of gagbull Motor unilateral weaknessbull Sensory impaired pain and temperature classically contralateral to

facebull Coordination impaired finger-nose-finger HKS inability to walk

Pract Neurol201010129-139 doi101136jnnp2010211607 ReviewChronic dizziness a practical approach Bronstein AM et al

+

Exam finding Central lesion Vestibularneuritis

Groupdifference

Vertical saccadicpursuit

88 20 p lt 01

Gaze evokednystagmus

56 17 p lt 01

Skew deviation

40 0 p lt 01

Positive head thrust sign

39 82 plt 01

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008 Apr79(4)458-60Bedside differentiation of vestibular neuritis from central vestibular pseudoneuritis

Cnyrim CD Newman-Toker D Karch C Brandt T Strupp M

Neuro-imaging

bull Head CT will rule out hemorrhagendash Negative head CT does not rule out acute ischemic

stroke

bull Brain MRI is the best study

So who needs an acute work-up

bull No bright line rulebull Factors in favor of acute work-up

ndash stroke risk factors (including age gt50) and acute onset vertigondash Headachendash Additional neurologic complaints (besides nv hearing loss

tinnitus)ndash focal finding on neuro exam

bull Factors in favor of foregoing MRIndash Unidirectional horizontal nystagmus that improves with fixationndash Unilateral hearing loss tinnitus without other neurologic signs ndash ABSENCE OF STROKE RISK FACTORS ndash Absence of focal findings on neuro exam

Approach 1 Forego MRI if

A patient has isolated acute vertigo peripheral vestibular nystagmus that is suppressed by visual fixation and is unstable but can still walk ok to defer MRI for 48 hours Substantial improvement in 48 hours is consistent with vestibular neuritis and brain imaging is not necessary Hotson et al NEJM 1998

Approach 2Obtain MRI if

1-acute or subacute onset of prolonged vertigo and postural imbalance and2-horizontal spontaneous nystagmus 3-AND one or more of the following

ndash Skew deviationndash Gaze evoked nystagmus (opposite to the direction of

spontaneous nystagmus)ndash Vertical saccadic pursuitndash Normal head thrust test ORndash Severe or multiple vascular risk factorsCnyrim et al J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2008

Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology

bull Cardio-embolic

bull Large vessel atherosclerosis

bull Vertebral artery dissection (especially in young patients)

bull Small vessel disease

bull Artery-artery embolismbull Hypercoaguable states vasculitis venous sinus thrombosis acute cocaine use

Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient

bull History

1-characterize the dizziness

2-onset of vertigo

3-duration of vertigo

4-accompanying symptoms

5-stroke risk factors

bull Exam

-Characterize nystagmus

-Gait

-Other neurologic findings

-add to your repertoire

-head thrust test

-vertical pursuit

-skew deviation

  • Evaluating the acutely dizzy patient
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Dizziness the problem
  • The dizzy patient history
  • Peripheral vs Central
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus
  • Vertigo exam nystagmus
  • What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic
  • Vertigo exam gait
  • Vertigo Exam other findings
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Neuro-imaging
  • So who needs an acute work-up
  • Approach 1 Forego MRI if
  • Approach 2Obtain MRI if
  • Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology
  • Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient
Page 6: Evaluating the acutely dizzy patientdepts.washington.edu/uwmedres/program/conferences/... · vestibular nystagmusthat is suppressed by visual fixation, and is unstable but can still

Acute Vestibular SyndromeJohn R Hotson MD and Robert W Baloh MDN Engl J Med 1998 339680-685September 3 1998etic Resonance Image of a Right Inferior Cerebellar Infarction in a Man with Acute Vertigo Vomiting Nystagmus

Elicited by Right Left or Upward Gaze and Severe Gait Instability

Hotson JR Baloh RW N Engl J Med 1998339680-685

Edlow et al Lancet Neurol 2008

Edlow et al Lancet Neurol 2008

Edlow et al Lancet Neurol 2008

SCA Limb andor trunk ataxia dysarthria

AICA acute vestibular syndrome hearing loss

PICA acute vestibular syndrome

Each can also have NV and associated brainstem signs

Why diagnose stroke1-acute treatment2-prevent further events

3 of strokes =20000 yearly in the US Edlow NEJM 2008

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 2 onset of vertigo

bull Question 3 duration of vertigo

bull Question 4 accompanying symptoms

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 2 onset of vertigo

bull Question 3 duration of vertigo

bull Question 4 accompanying symptomsndash Nausea vomiting (not very helpful)

ndash Tinnitus hearing loss

ndash Headache

ndash Weakness numbness

ndash Swallowing difficulty hiccups hoarseness

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 5 stroke risk factorsndash Prior strokeTIA Hypertension Diabetes

hyperlipidemia atrial-fibrillation smoking age

ndash Hemorrhagic CVA risk factors (meds)

ndash Other Cocaine use trauma stroke-prone disease (Lupus Hyper-coaguable state)

Etiology of peripheral vertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Vestibular neuritis

Acute vsevolves over hours

Days to weeks

No NV unsteadinessTinnitus +-

Labyrinthitis Acute vsevolves over hours

Days to weeks

Yes NV unsteadinessTinnitus +-

BPPV Acute Intermittent brief seconds

No N unsteadiness

Menierersquos disease

Acute Hours Maybe NV unsteadiness tinnitus +-

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellarinfarct PICA

Acute days-yrs no NV falls

Cerebellar infarctAICA

Acute days-yrs yes NV falls

Brainstem infarct Acute days-yrs no many

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellarinfarct PICA

Acute days-yrs no NV falls

Cerebellar infarctAICA

Acute days-yrs yes NV falls

Brainstem infarct Acute days-yrs no many

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellar TIAPICA

Acute minutes no NV falls

Cerebellar TIAAICA

Acute minutes yes NV falls

Brainstem TIA Acute minutes no many

Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus

bull Horizontal vs vertical

bull Direction ndash characterize it by the fast component

bull Does the direction change depending on direction of gaze

Vertigo exam nystagmusCharacteristics of peripheral nystagmus

bull Horizontal

bull Unidirectionalndash Fast phase always in same

direction

bull Improves with fixation

bull Worsens with removing fixation ndash Ophthalmoscope cover

fixating eye

Characteristics of central nystagmus

bull Horizontal or vertical or purely torsional

bull Uni or multi-directionalndash Fast phase may change with

direction of gaze

bull Does not improve with fixation

bull No change with removing fixation

What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic

bull Perform Hallpike Dix manuver to try to trigger nystagmus

bull Consider head thrust test correctional saccade is a sign of peripheral lesion

Vertigo exam gait

bull Peripheral vertigo patient leansveers toward side of lesion may fall this way on Romberg testingndash Instruct patient to falllean in the direction they feel

like fallingleaning (rather than compensating)ndash ldquounidirectional postural instability with preserved

walkingrdquo Hotson et al NEJM 1998

bull Central vertigondash often canrsquot walk without fallingndash May leanfall in more than one direction

Vertigo Exam other findings

bull Cranial nervesndash 2 funduscopic exam disc edema

pupils Hornerrsquosndash 3 Skew deviation (vertical misalignment) extraocular movements

cover-uncoverVertical smooth pursuit saccadic interruptions

ndash 5 impaired pain and temperature (ipsilateral)ndash 7 face weaknessndash 3 6 8 Head thrust test nystagmus ndash 9 10 hoarseness unilateral decreased palate elevation unilateral loss

of gagbull Motor unilateral weaknessbull Sensory impaired pain and temperature classically contralateral to

facebull Coordination impaired finger-nose-finger HKS inability to walk

Pract Neurol201010129-139 doi101136jnnp2010211607 ReviewChronic dizziness a practical approach Bronstein AM et al

+

Exam finding Central lesion Vestibularneuritis

Groupdifference

Vertical saccadicpursuit

88 20 p lt 01

Gaze evokednystagmus

56 17 p lt 01

Skew deviation

40 0 p lt 01

Positive head thrust sign

39 82 plt 01

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008 Apr79(4)458-60Bedside differentiation of vestibular neuritis from central vestibular pseudoneuritis

Cnyrim CD Newman-Toker D Karch C Brandt T Strupp M

Neuro-imaging

bull Head CT will rule out hemorrhagendash Negative head CT does not rule out acute ischemic

stroke

bull Brain MRI is the best study

So who needs an acute work-up

bull No bright line rulebull Factors in favor of acute work-up

ndash stroke risk factors (including age gt50) and acute onset vertigondash Headachendash Additional neurologic complaints (besides nv hearing loss

tinnitus)ndash focal finding on neuro exam

bull Factors in favor of foregoing MRIndash Unidirectional horizontal nystagmus that improves with fixationndash Unilateral hearing loss tinnitus without other neurologic signs ndash ABSENCE OF STROKE RISK FACTORS ndash Absence of focal findings on neuro exam

Approach 1 Forego MRI if

A patient has isolated acute vertigo peripheral vestibular nystagmus that is suppressed by visual fixation and is unstable but can still walk ok to defer MRI for 48 hours Substantial improvement in 48 hours is consistent with vestibular neuritis and brain imaging is not necessary Hotson et al NEJM 1998

Approach 2Obtain MRI if

1-acute or subacute onset of prolonged vertigo and postural imbalance and2-horizontal spontaneous nystagmus 3-AND one or more of the following

ndash Skew deviationndash Gaze evoked nystagmus (opposite to the direction of

spontaneous nystagmus)ndash Vertical saccadic pursuitndash Normal head thrust test ORndash Severe or multiple vascular risk factorsCnyrim et al J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2008

Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology

bull Cardio-embolic

bull Large vessel atherosclerosis

bull Vertebral artery dissection (especially in young patients)

bull Small vessel disease

bull Artery-artery embolismbull Hypercoaguable states vasculitis venous sinus thrombosis acute cocaine use

Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient

bull History

1-characterize the dizziness

2-onset of vertigo

3-duration of vertigo

4-accompanying symptoms

5-stroke risk factors

bull Exam

-Characterize nystagmus

-Gait

-Other neurologic findings

-add to your repertoire

-head thrust test

-vertical pursuit

-skew deviation

  • Evaluating the acutely dizzy patient
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Dizziness the problem
  • The dizzy patient history
  • Peripheral vs Central
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus
  • Vertigo exam nystagmus
  • What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic
  • Vertigo exam gait
  • Vertigo Exam other findings
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Neuro-imaging
  • So who needs an acute work-up
  • Approach 1 Forego MRI if
  • Approach 2Obtain MRI if
  • Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology
  • Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient
Page 7: Evaluating the acutely dizzy patientdepts.washington.edu/uwmedres/program/conferences/... · vestibular nystagmusthat is suppressed by visual fixation, and is unstable but can still

Edlow et al Lancet Neurol 2008

Edlow et al Lancet Neurol 2008

Edlow et al Lancet Neurol 2008

SCA Limb andor trunk ataxia dysarthria

AICA acute vestibular syndrome hearing loss

PICA acute vestibular syndrome

Each can also have NV and associated brainstem signs

Why diagnose stroke1-acute treatment2-prevent further events

3 of strokes =20000 yearly in the US Edlow NEJM 2008

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 2 onset of vertigo

bull Question 3 duration of vertigo

bull Question 4 accompanying symptoms

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 2 onset of vertigo

bull Question 3 duration of vertigo

bull Question 4 accompanying symptomsndash Nausea vomiting (not very helpful)

ndash Tinnitus hearing loss

ndash Headache

ndash Weakness numbness

ndash Swallowing difficulty hiccups hoarseness

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 5 stroke risk factorsndash Prior strokeTIA Hypertension Diabetes

hyperlipidemia atrial-fibrillation smoking age

ndash Hemorrhagic CVA risk factors (meds)

ndash Other Cocaine use trauma stroke-prone disease (Lupus Hyper-coaguable state)

Etiology of peripheral vertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Vestibular neuritis

Acute vsevolves over hours

Days to weeks

No NV unsteadinessTinnitus +-

Labyrinthitis Acute vsevolves over hours

Days to weeks

Yes NV unsteadinessTinnitus +-

BPPV Acute Intermittent brief seconds

No N unsteadiness

Menierersquos disease

Acute Hours Maybe NV unsteadiness tinnitus +-

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellarinfarct PICA

Acute days-yrs no NV falls

Cerebellar infarctAICA

Acute days-yrs yes NV falls

Brainstem infarct Acute days-yrs no many

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellarinfarct PICA

Acute days-yrs no NV falls

Cerebellar infarctAICA

Acute days-yrs yes NV falls

Brainstem infarct Acute days-yrs no many

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellar TIAPICA

Acute minutes no NV falls

Cerebellar TIAAICA

Acute minutes yes NV falls

Brainstem TIA Acute minutes no many

Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus

bull Horizontal vs vertical

bull Direction ndash characterize it by the fast component

bull Does the direction change depending on direction of gaze

Vertigo exam nystagmusCharacteristics of peripheral nystagmus

bull Horizontal

bull Unidirectionalndash Fast phase always in same

direction

bull Improves with fixation

bull Worsens with removing fixation ndash Ophthalmoscope cover

fixating eye

Characteristics of central nystagmus

bull Horizontal or vertical or purely torsional

bull Uni or multi-directionalndash Fast phase may change with

direction of gaze

bull Does not improve with fixation

bull No change with removing fixation

What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic

bull Perform Hallpike Dix manuver to try to trigger nystagmus

bull Consider head thrust test correctional saccade is a sign of peripheral lesion

Vertigo exam gait

bull Peripheral vertigo patient leansveers toward side of lesion may fall this way on Romberg testingndash Instruct patient to falllean in the direction they feel

like fallingleaning (rather than compensating)ndash ldquounidirectional postural instability with preserved

walkingrdquo Hotson et al NEJM 1998

bull Central vertigondash often canrsquot walk without fallingndash May leanfall in more than one direction

Vertigo Exam other findings

bull Cranial nervesndash 2 funduscopic exam disc edema

pupils Hornerrsquosndash 3 Skew deviation (vertical misalignment) extraocular movements

cover-uncoverVertical smooth pursuit saccadic interruptions

ndash 5 impaired pain and temperature (ipsilateral)ndash 7 face weaknessndash 3 6 8 Head thrust test nystagmus ndash 9 10 hoarseness unilateral decreased palate elevation unilateral loss

of gagbull Motor unilateral weaknessbull Sensory impaired pain and temperature classically contralateral to

facebull Coordination impaired finger-nose-finger HKS inability to walk

Pract Neurol201010129-139 doi101136jnnp2010211607 ReviewChronic dizziness a practical approach Bronstein AM et al

+

Exam finding Central lesion Vestibularneuritis

Groupdifference

Vertical saccadicpursuit

88 20 p lt 01

Gaze evokednystagmus

56 17 p lt 01

Skew deviation

40 0 p lt 01

Positive head thrust sign

39 82 plt 01

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008 Apr79(4)458-60Bedside differentiation of vestibular neuritis from central vestibular pseudoneuritis

Cnyrim CD Newman-Toker D Karch C Brandt T Strupp M

Neuro-imaging

bull Head CT will rule out hemorrhagendash Negative head CT does not rule out acute ischemic

stroke

bull Brain MRI is the best study

So who needs an acute work-up

bull No bright line rulebull Factors in favor of acute work-up

ndash stroke risk factors (including age gt50) and acute onset vertigondash Headachendash Additional neurologic complaints (besides nv hearing loss

tinnitus)ndash focal finding on neuro exam

bull Factors in favor of foregoing MRIndash Unidirectional horizontal nystagmus that improves with fixationndash Unilateral hearing loss tinnitus without other neurologic signs ndash ABSENCE OF STROKE RISK FACTORS ndash Absence of focal findings on neuro exam

Approach 1 Forego MRI if

A patient has isolated acute vertigo peripheral vestibular nystagmus that is suppressed by visual fixation and is unstable but can still walk ok to defer MRI for 48 hours Substantial improvement in 48 hours is consistent with vestibular neuritis and brain imaging is not necessary Hotson et al NEJM 1998

Approach 2Obtain MRI if

1-acute or subacute onset of prolonged vertigo and postural imbalance and2-horizontal spontaneous nystagmus 3-AND one or more of the following

ndash Skew deviationndash Gaze evoked nystagmus (opposite to the direction of

spontaneous nystagmus)ndash Vertical saccadic pursuitndash Normal head thrust test ORndash Severe or multiple vascular risk factorsCnyrim et al J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2008

Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology

bull Cardio-embolic

bull Large vessel atherosclerosis

bull Vertebral artery dissection (especially in young patients)

bull Small vessel disease

bull Artery-artery embolismbull Hypercoaguable states vasculitis venous sinus thrombosis acute cocaine use

Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient

bull History

1-characterize the dizziness

2-onset of vertigo

3-duration of vertigo

4-accompanying symptoms

5-stroke risk factors

bull Exam

-Characterize nystagmus

-Gait

-Other neurologic findings

-add to your repertoire

-head thrust test

-vertical pursuit

-skew deviation

  • Evaluating the acutely dizzy patient
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Dizziness the problem
  • The dizzy patient history
  • Peripheral vs Central
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus
  • Vertigo exam nystagmus
  • What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic
  • Vertigo exam gait
  • Vertigo Exam other findings
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Neuro-imaging
  • So who needs an acute work-up
  • Approach 1 Forego MRI if
  • Approach 2Obtain MRI if
  • Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology
  • Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient
Page 8: Evaluating the acutely dizzy patientdepts.washington.edu/uwmedres/program/conferences/... · vestibular nystagmusthat is suppressed by visual fixation, and is unstable but can still

Edlow et al Lancet Neurol 2008

Edlow et al Lancet Neurol 2008

SCA Limb andor trunk ataxia dysarthria

AICA acute vestibular syndrome hearing loss

PICA acute vestibular syndrome

Each can also have NV and associated brainstem signs

Why diagnose stroke1-acute treatment2-prevent further events

3 of strokes =20000 yearly in the US Edlow NEJM 2008

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 2 onset of vertigo

bull Question 3 duration of vertigo

bull Question 4 accompanying symptoms

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 2 onset of vertigo

bull Question 3 duration of vertigo

bull Question 4 accompanying symptomsndash Nausea vomiting (not very helpful)

ndash Tinnitus hearing loss

ndash Headache

ndash Weakness numbness

ndash Swallowing difficulty hiccups hoarseness

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 5 stroke risk factorsndash Prior strokeTIA Hypertension Diabetes

hyperlipidemia atrial-fibrillation smoking age

ndash Hemorrhagic CVA risk factors (meds)

ndash Other Cocaine use trauma stroke-prone disease (Lupus Hyper-coaguable state)

Etiology of peripheral vertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Vestibular neuritis

Acute vsevolves over hours

Days to weeks

No NV unsteadinessTinnitus +-

Labyrinthitis Acute vsevolves over hours

Days to weeks

Yes NV unsteadinessTinnitus +-

BPPV Acute Intermittent brief seconds

No N unsteadiness

Menierersquos disease

Acute Hours Maybe NV unsteadiness tinnitus +-

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellarinfarct PICA

Acute days-yrs no NV falls

Cerebellar infarctAICA

Acute days-yrs yes NV falls

Brainstem infarct Acute days-yrs no many

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellarinfarct PICA

Acute days-yrs no NV falls

Cerebellar infarctAICA

Acute days-yrs yes NV falls

Brainstem infarct Acute days-yrs no many

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellar TIAPICA

Acute minutes no NV falls

Cerebellar TIAAICA

Acute minutes yes NV falls

Brainstem TIA Acute minutes no many

Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus

bull Horizontal vs vertical

bull Direction ndash characterize it by the fast component

bull Does the direction change depending on direction of gaze

Vertigo exam nystagmusCharacteristics of peripheral nystagmus

bull Horizontal

bull Unidirectionalndash Fast phase always in same

direction

bull Improves with fixation

bull Worsens with removing fixation ndash Ophthalmoscope cover

fixating eye

Characteristics of central nystagmus

bull Horizontal or vertical or purely torsional

bull Uni or multi-directionalndash Fast phase may change with

direction of gaze

bull Does not improve with fixation

bull No change with removing fixation

What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic

bull Perform Hallpike Dix manuver to try to trigger nystagmus

bull Consider head thrust test correctional saccade is a sign of peripheral lesion

Vertigo exam gait

bull Peripheral vertigo patient leansveers toward side of lesion may fall this way on Romberg testingndash Instruct patient to falllean in the direction they feel

like fallingleaning (rather than compensating)ndash ldquounidirectional postural instability with preserved

walkingrdquo Hotson et al NEJM 1998

bull Central vertigondash often canrsquot walk without fallingndash May leanfall in more than one direction

Vertigo Exam other findings

bull Cranial nervesndash 2 funduscopic exam disc edema

pupils Hornerrsquosndash 3 Skew deviation (vertical misalignment) extraocular movements

cover-uncoverVertical smooth pursuit saccadic interruptions

ndash 5 impaired pain and temperature (ipsilateral)ndash 7 face weaknessndash 3 6 8 Head thrust test nystagmus ndash 9 10 hoarseness unilateral decreased palate elevation unilateral loss

of gagbull Motor unilateral weaknessbull Sensory impaired pain and temperature classically contralateral to

facebull Coordination impaired finger-nose-finger HKS inability to walk

Pract Neurol201010129-139 doi101136jnnp2010211607 ReviewChronic dizziness a practical approach Bronstein AM et al

+

Exam finding Central lesion Vestibularneuritis

Groupdifference

Vertical saccadicpursuit

88 20 p lt 01

Gaze evokednystagmus

56 17 p lt 01

Skew deviation

40 0 p lt 01

Positive head thrust sign

39 82 plt 01

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008 Apr79(4)458-60Bedside differentiation of vestibular neuritis from central vestibular pseudoneuritis

Cnyrim CD Newman-Toker D Karch C Brandt T Strupp M

Neuro-imaging

bull Head CT will rule out hemorrhagendash Negative head CT does not rule out acute ischemic

stroke

bull Brain MRI is the best study

So who needs an acute work-up

bull No bright line rulebull Factors in favor of acute work-up

ndash stroke risk factors (including age gt50) and acute onset vertigondash Headachendash Additional neurologic complaints (besides nv hearing loss

tinnitus)ndash focal finding on neuro exam

bull Factors in favor of foregoing MRIndash Unidirectional horizontal nystagmus that improves with fixationndash Unilateral hearing loss tinnitus without other neurologic signs ndash ABSENCE OF STROKE RISK FACTORS ndash Absence of focal findings on neuro exam

Approach 1 Forego MRI if

A patient has isolated acute vertigo peripheral vestibular nystagmus that is suppressed by visual fixation and is unstable but can still walk ok to defer MRI for 48 hours Substantial improvement in 48 hours is consistent with vestibular neuritis and brain imaging is not necessary Hotson et al NEJM 1998

Approach 2Obtain MRI if

1-acute or subacute onset of prolonged vertigo and postural imbalance and2-horizontal spontaneous nystagmus 3-AND one or more of the following

ndash Skew deviationndash Gaze evoked nystagmus (opposite to the direction of

spontaneous nystagmus)ndash Vertical saccadic pursuitndash Normal head thrust test ORndash Severe or multiple vascular risk factorsCnyrim et al J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2008

Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology

bull Cardio-embolic

bull Large vessel atherosclerosis

bull Vertebral artery dissection (especially in young patients)

bull Small vessel disease

bull Artery-artery embolismbull Hypercoaguable states vasculitis venous sinus thrombosis acute cocaine use

Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient

bull History

1-characterize the dizziness

2-onset of vertigo

3-duration of vertigo

4-accompanying symptoms

5-stroke risk factors

bull Exam

-Characterize nystagmus

-Gait

-Other neurologic findings

-add to your repertoire

-head thrust test

-vertical pursuit

-skew deviation

  • Evaluating the acutely dizzy patient
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Dizziness the problem
  • The dizzy patient history
  • Peripheral vs Central
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus
  • Vertigo exam nystagmus
  • What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic
  • Vertigo exam gait
  • Vertigo Exam other findings
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Neuro-imaging
  • So who needs an acute work-up
  • Approach 1 Forego MRI if
  • Approach 2Obtain MRI if
  • Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology
  • Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient
Page 9: Evaluating the acutely dizzy patientdepts.washington.edu/uwmedres/program/conferences/... · vestibular nystagmusthat is suppressed by visual fixation, and is unstable but can still

Edlow et al Lancet Neurol 2008

SCA Limb andor trunk ataxia dysarthria

AICA acute vestibular syndrome hearing loss

PICA acute vestibular syndrome

Each can also have NV and associated brainstem signs

Why diagnose stroke1-acute treatment2-prevent further events

3 of strokes =20000 yearly in the US Edlow NEJM 2008

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 2 onset of vertigo

bull Question 3 duration of vertigo

bull Question 4 accompanying symptoms

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 2 onset of vertigo

bull Question 3 duration of vertigo

bull Question 4 accompanying symptomsndash Nausea vomiting (not very helpful)

ndash Tinnitus hearing loss

ndash Headache

ndash Weakness numbness

ndash Swallowing difficulty hiccups hoarseness

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 5 stroke risk factorsndash Prior strokeTIA Hypertension Diabetes

hyperlipidemia atrial-fibrillation smoking age

ndash Hemorrhagic CVA risk factors (meds)

ndash Other Cocaine use trauma stroke-prone disease (Lupus Hyper-coaguable state)

Etiology of peripheral vertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Vestibular neuritis

Acute vsevolves over hours

Days to weeks

No NV unsteadinessTinnitus +-

Labyrinthitis Acute vsevolves over hours

Days to weeks

Yes NV unsteadinessTinnitus +-

BPPV Acute Intermittent brief seconds

No N unsteadiness

Menierersquos disease

Acute Hours Maybe NV unsteadiness tinnitus +-

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellarinfarct PICA

Acute days-yrs no NV falls

Cerebellar infarctAICA

Acute days-yrs yes NV falls

Brainstem infarct Acute days-yrs no many

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellarinfarct PICA

Acute days-yrs no NV falls

Cerebellar infarctAICA

Acute days-yrs yes NV falls

Brainstem infarct Acute days-yrs no many

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellar TIAPICA

Acute minutes no NV falls

Cerebellar TIAAICA

Acute minutes yes NV falls

Brainstem TIA Acute minutes no many

Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus

bull Horizontal vs vertical

bull Direction ndash characterize it by the fast component

bull Does the direction change depending on direction of gaze

Vertigo exam nystagmusCharacteristics of peripheral nystagmus

bull Horizontal

bull Unidirectionalndash Fast phase always in same

direction

bull Improves with fixation

bull Worsens with removing fixation ndash Ophthalmoscope cover

fixating eye

Characteristics of central nystagmus

bull Horizontal or vertical or purely torsional

bull Uni or multi-directionalndash Fast phase may change with

direction of gaze

bull Does not improve with fixation

bull No change with removing fixation

What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic

bull Perform Hallpike Dix manuver to try to trigger nystagmus

bull Consider head thrust test correctional saccade is a sign of peripheral lesion

Vertigo exam gait

bull Peripheral vertigo patient leansveers toward side of lesion may fall this way on Romberg testingndash Instruct patient to falllean in the direction they feel

like fallingleaning (rather than compensating)ndash ldquounidirectional postural instability with preserved

walkingrdquo Hotson et al NEJM 1998

bull Central vertigondash often canrsquot walk without fallingndash May leanfall in more than one direction

Vertigo Exam other findings

bull Cranial nervesndash 2 funduscopic exam disc edema

pupils Hornerrsquosndash 3 Skew deviation (vertical misalignment) extraocular movements

cover-uncoverVertical smooth pursuit saccadic interruptions

ndash 5 impaired pain and temperature (ipsilateral)ndash 7 face weaknessndash 3 6 8 Head thrust test nystagmus ndash 9 10 hoarseness unilateral decreased palate elevation unilateral loss

of gagbull Motor unilateral weaknessbull Sensory impaired pain and temperature classically contralateral to

facebull Coordination impaired finger-nose-finger HKS inability to walk

Pract Neurol201010129-139 doi101136jnnp2010211607 ReviewChronic dizziness a practical approach Bronstein AM et al

+

Exam finding Central lesion Vestibularneuritis

Groupdifference

Vertical saccadicpursuit

88 20 p lt 01

Gaze evokednystagmus

56 17 p lt 01

Skew deviation

40 0 p lt 01

Positive head thrust sign

39 82 plt 01

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008 Apr79(4)458-60Bedside differentiation of vestibular neuritis from central vestibular pseudoneuritis

Cnyrim CD Newman-Toker D Karch C Brandt T Strupp M

Neuro-imaging

bull Head CT will rule out hemorrhagendash Negative head CT does not rule out acute ischemic

stroke

bull Brain MRI is the best study

So who needs an acute work-up

bull No bright line rulebull Factors in favor of acute work-up

ndash stroke risk factors (including age gt50) and acute onset vertigondash Headachendash Additional neurologic complaints (besides nv hearing loss

tinnitus)ndash focal finding on neuro exam

bull Factors in favor of foregoing MRIndash Unidirectional horizontal nystagmus that improves with fixationndash Unilateral hearing loss tinnitus without other neurologic signs ndash ABSENCE OF STROKE RISK FACTORS ndash Absence of focal findings on neuro exam

Approach 1 Forego MRI if

A patient has isolated acute vertigo peripheral vestibular nystagmus that is suppressed by visual fixation and is unstable but can still walk ok to defer MRI for 48 hours Substantial improvement in 48 hours is consistent with vestibular neuritis and brain imaging is not necessary Hotson et al NEJM 1998

Approach 2Obtain MRI if

1-acute or subacute onset of prolonged vertigo and postural imbalance and2-horizontal spontaneous nystagmus 3-AND one or more of the following

ndash Skew deviationndash Gaze evoked nystagmus (opposite to the direction of

spontaneous nystagmus)ndash Vertical saccadic pursuitndash Normal head thrust test ORndash Severe or multiple vascular risk factorsCnyrim et al J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2008

Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology

bull Cardio-embolic

bull Large vessel atherosclerosis

bull Vertebral artery dissection (especially in young patients)

bull Small vessel disease

bull Artery-artery embolismbull Hypercoaguable states vasculitis venous sinus thrombosis acute cocaine use

Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient

bull History

1-characterize the dizziness

2-onset of vertigo

3-duration of vertigo

4-accompanying symptoms

5-stroke risk factors

bull Exam

-Characterize nystagmus

-Gait

-Other neurologic findings

-add to your repertoire

-head thrust test

-vertical pursuit

-skew deviation

  • Evaluating the acutely dizzy patient
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Dizziness the problem
  • The dizzy patient history
  • Peripheral vs Central
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus
  • Vertigo exam nystagmus
  • What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic
  • Vertigo exam gait
  • Vertigo Exam other findings
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Neuro-imaging
  • So who needs an acute work-up
  • Approach 1 Forego MRI if
  • Approach 2Obtain MRI if
  • Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology
  • Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient
Page 10: Evaluating the acutely dizzy patientdepts.washington.edu/uwmedres/program/conferences/... · vestibular nystagmusthat is suppressed by visual fixation, and is unstable but can still

Why diagnose stroke1-acute treatment2-prevent further events

3 of strokes =20000 yearly in the US Edlow NEJM 2008

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 2 onset of vertigo

bull Question 3 duration of vertigo

bull Question 4 accompanying symptoms

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 2 onset of vertigo

bull Question 3 duration of vertigo

bull Question 4 accompanying symptomsndash Nausea vomiting (not very helpful)

ndash Tinnitus hearing loss

ndash Headache

ndash Weakness numbness

ndash Swallowing difficulty hiccups hoarseness

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 5 stroke risk factorsndash Prior strokeTIA Hypertension Diabetes

hyperlipidemia atrial-fibrillation smoking age

ndash Hemorrhagic CVA risk factors (meds)

ndash Other Cocaine use trauma stroke-prone disease (Lupus Hyper-coaguable state)

Etiology of peripheral vertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Vestibular neuritis

Acute vsevolves over hours

Days to weeks

No NV unsteadinessTinnitus +-

Labyrinthitis Acute vsevolves over hours

Days to weeks

Yes NV unsteadinessTinnitus +-

BPPV Acute Intermittent brief seconds

No N unsteadiness

Menierersquos disease

Acute Hours Maybe NV unsteadiness tinnitus +-

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellarinfarct PICA

Acute days-yrs no NV falls

Cerebellar infarctAICA

Acute days-yrs yes NV falls

Brainstem infarct Acute days-yrs no many

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellarinfarct PICA

Acute days-yrs no NV falls

Cerebellar infarctAICA

Acute days-yrs yes NV falls

Brainstem infarct Acute days-yrs no many

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellar TIAPICA

Acute minutes no NV falls

Cerebellar TIAAICA

Acute minutes yes NV falls

Brainstem TIA Acute minutes no many

Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus

bull Horizontal vs vertical

bull Direction ndash characterize it by the fast component

bull Does the direction change depending on direction of gaze

Vertigo exam nystagmusCharacteristics of peripheral nystagmus

bull Horizontal

bull Unidirectionalndash Fast phase always in same

direction

bull Improves with fixation

bull Worsens with removing fixation ndash Ophthalmoscope cover

fixating eye

Characteristics of central nystagmus

bull Horizontal or vertical or purely torsional

bull Uni or multi-directionalndash Fast phase may change with

direction of gaze

bull Does not improve with fixation

bull No change with removing fixation

What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic

bull Perform Hallpike Dix manuver to try to trigger nystagmus

bull Consider head thrust test correctional saccade is a sign of peripheral lesion

Vertigo exam gait

bull Peripheral vertigo patient leansveers toward side of lesion may fall this way on Romberg testingndash Instruct patient to falllean in the direction they feel

like fallingleaning (rather than compensating)ndash ldquounidirectional postural instability with preserved

walkingrdquo Hotson et al NEJM 1998

bull Central vertigondash often canrsquot walk without fallingndash May leanfall in more than one direction

Vertigo Exam other findings

bull Cranial nervesndash 2 funduscopic exam disc edema

pupils Hornerrsquosndash 3 Skew deviation (vertical misalignment) extraocular movements

cover-uncoverVertical smooth pursuit saccadic interruptions

ndash 5 impaired pain and temperature (ipsilateral)ndash 7 face weaknessndash 3 6 8 Head thrust test nystagmus ndash 9 10 hoarseness unilateral decreased palate elevation unilateral loss

of gagbull Motor unilateral weaknessbull Sensory impaired pain and temperature classically contralateral to

facebull Coordination impaired finger-nose-finger HKS inability to walk

Pract Neurol201010129-139 doi101136jnnp2010211607 ReviewChronic dizziness a practical approach Bronstein AM et al

+

Exam finding Central lesion Vestibularneuritis

Groupdifference

Vertical saccadicpursuit

88 20 p lt 01

Gaze evokednystagmus

56 17 p lt 01

Skew deviation

40 0 p lt 01

Positive head thrust sign

39 82 plt 01

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008 Apr79(4)458-60Bedside differentiation of vestibular neuritis from central vestibular pseudoneuritis

Cnyrim CD Newman-Toker D Karch C Brandt T Strupp M

Neuro-imaging

bull Head CT will rule out hemorrhagendash Negative head CT does not rule out acute ischemic

stroke

bull Brain MRI is the best study

So who needs an acute work-up

bull No bright line rulebull Factors in favor of acute work-up

ndash stroke risk factors (including age gt50) and acute onset vertigondash Headachendash Additional neurologic complaints (besides nv hearing loss

tinnitus)ndash focal finding on neuro exam

bull Factors in favor of foregoing MRIndash Unidirectional horizontal nystagmus that improves with fixationndash Unilateral hearing loss tinnitus without other neurologic signs ndash ABSENCE OF STROKE RISK FACTORS ndash Absence of focal findings on neuro exam

Approach 1 Forego MRI if

A patient has isolated acute vertigo peripheral vestibular nystagmus that is suppressed by visual fixation and is unstable but can still walk ok to defer MRI for 48 hours Substantial improvement in 48 hours is consistent with vestibular neuritis and brain imaging is not necessary Hotson et al NEJM 1998

Approach 2Obtain MRI if

1-acute or subacute onset of prolonged vertigo and postural imbalance and2-horizontal spontaneous nystagmus 3-AND one or more of the following

ndash Skew deviationndash Gaze evoked nystagmus (opposite to the direction of

spontaneous nystagmus)ndash Vertical saccadic pursuitndash Normal head thrust test ORndash Severe or multiple vascular risk factorsCnyrim et al J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2008

Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology

bull Cardio-embolic

bull Large vessel atherosclerosis

bull Vertebral artery dissection (especially in young patients)

bull Small vessel disease

bull Artery-artery embolismbull Hypercoaguable states vasculitis venous sinus thrombosis acute cocaine use

Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient

bull History

1-characterize the dizziness

2-onset of vertigo

3-duration of vertigo

4-accompanying symptoms

5-stroke risk factors

bull Exam

-Characterize nystagmus

-Gait

-Other neurologic findings

-add to your repertoire

-head thrust test

-vertical pursuit

-skew deviation

  • Evaluating the acutely dizzy patient
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Dizziness the problem
  • The dizzy patient history
  • Peripheral vs Central
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus
  • Vertigo exam nystagmus
  • What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic
  • Vertigo exam gait
  • Vertigo Exam other findings
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Neuro-imaging
  • So who needs an acute work-up
  • Approach 1 Forego MRI if
  • Approach 2Obtain MRI if
  • Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology
  • Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient
Page 11: Evaluating the acutely dizzy patientdepts.washington.edu/uwmedres/program/conferences/... · vestibular nystagmusthat is suppressed by visual fixation, and is unstable but can still

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 2 onset of vertigo

bull Question 3 duration of vertigo

bull Question 4 accompanying symptoms

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 2 onset of vertigo

bull Question 3 duration of vertigo

bull Question 4 accompanying symptomsndash Nausea vomiting (not very helpful)

ndash Tinnitus hearing loss

ndash Headache

ndash Weakness numbness

ndash Swallowing difficulty hiccups hoarseness

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 5 stroke risk factorsndash Prior strokeTIA Hypertension Diabetes

hyperlipidemia atrial-fibrillation smoking age

ndash Hemorrhagic CVA risk factors (meds)

ndash Other Cocaine use trauma stroke-prone disease (Lupus Hyper-coaguable state)

Etiology of peripheral vertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Vestibular neuritis

Acute vsevolves over hours

Days to weeks

No NV unsteadinessTinnitus +-

Labyrinthitis Acute vsevolves over hours

Days to weeks

Yes NV unsteadinessTinnitus +-

BPPV Acute Intermittent brief seconds

No N unsteadiness

Menierersquos disease

Acute Hours Maybe NV unsteadiness tinnitus +-

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellarinfarct PICA

Acute days-yrs no NV falls

Cerebellar infarctAICA

Acute days-yrs yes NV falls

Brainstem infarct Acute days-yrs no many

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellarinfarct PICA

Acute days-yrs no NV falls

Cerebellar infarctAICA

Acute days-yrs yes NV falls

Brainstem infarct Acute days-yrs no many

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellar TIAPICA

Acute minutes no NV falls

Cerebellar TIAAICA

Acute minutes yes NV falls

Brainstem TIA Acute minutes no many

Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus

bull Horizontal vs vertical

bull Direction ndash characterize it by the fast component

bull Does the direction change depending on direction of gaze

Vertigo exam nystagmusCharacteristics of peripheral nystagmus

bull Horizontal

bull Unidirectionalndash Fast phase always in same

direction

bull Improves with fixation

bull Worsens with removing fixation ndash Ophthalmoscope cover

fixating eye

Characteristics of central nystagmus

bull Horizontal or vertical or purely torsional

bull Uni or multi-directionalndash Fast phase may change with

direction of gaze

bull Does not improve with fixation

bull No change with removing fixation

What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic

bull Perform Hallpike Dix manuver to try to trigger nystagmus

bull Consider head thrust test correctional saccade is a sign of peripheral lesion

Vertigo exam gait

bull Peripheral vertigo patient leansveers toward side of lesion may fall this way on Romberg testingndash Instruct patient to falllean in the direction they feel

like fallingleaning (rather than compensating)ndash ldquounidirectional postural instability with preserved

walkingrdquo Hotson et al NEJM 1998

bull Central vertigondash often canrsquot walk without fallingndash May leanfall in more than one direction

Vertigo Exam other findings

bull Cranial nervesndash 2 funduscopic exam disc edema

pupils Hornerrsquosndash 3 Skew deviation (vertical misalignment) extraocular movements

cover-uncoverVertical smooth pursuit saccadic interruptions

ndash 5 impaired pain and temperature (ipsilateral)ndash 7 face weaknessndash 3 6 8 Head thrust test nystagmus ndash 9 10 hoarseness unilateral decreased palate elevation unilateral loss

of gagbull Motor unilateral weaknessbull Sensory impaired pain and temperature classically contralateral to

facebull Coordination impaired finger-nose-finger HKS inability to walk

Pract Neurol201010129-139 doi101136jnnp2010211607 ReviewChronic dizziness a practical approach Bronstein AM et al

+

Exam finding Central lesion Vestibularneuritis

Groupdifference

Vertical saccadicpursuit

88 20 p lt 01

Gaze evokednystagmus

56 17 p lt 01

Skew deviation

40 0 p lt 01

Positive head thrust sign

39 82 plt 01

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008 Apr79(4)458-60Bedside differentiation of vestibular neuritis from central vestibular pseudoneuritis

Cnyrim CD Newman-Toker D Karch C Brandt T Strupp M

Neuro-imaging

bull Head CT will rule out hemorrhagendash Negative head CT does not rule out acute ischemic

stroke

bull Brain MRI is the best study

So who needs an acute work-up

bull No bright line rulebull Factors in favor of acute work-up

ndash stroke risk factors (including age gt50) and acute onset vertigondash Headachendash Additional neurologic complaints (besides nv hearing loss

tinnitus)ndash focal finding on neuro exam

bull Factors in favor of foregoing MRIndash Unidirectional horizontal nystagmus that improves with fixationndash Unilateral hearing loss tinnitus without other neurologic signs ndash ABSENCE OF STROKE RISK FACTORS ndash Absence of focal findings on neuro exam

Approach 1 Forego MRI if

A patient has isolated acute vertigo peripheral vestibular nystagmus that is suppressed by visual fixation and is unstable but can still walk ok to defer MRI for 48 hours Substantial improvement in 48 hours is consistent with vestibular neuritis and brain imaging is not necessary Hotson et al NEJM 1998

Approach 2Obtain MRI if

1-acute or subacute onset of prolonged vertigo and postural imbalance and2-horizontal spontaneous nystagmus 3-AND one or more of the following

ndash Skew deviationndash Gaze evoked nystagmus (opposite to the direction of

spontaneous nystagmus)ndash Vertical saccadic pursuitndash Normal head thrust test ORndash Severe or multiple vascular risk factorsCnyrim et al J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2008

Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology

bull Cardio-embolic

bull Large vessel atherosclerosis

bull Vertebral artery dissection (especially in young patients)

bull Small vessel disease

bull Artery-artery embolismbull Hypercoaguable states vasculitis venous sinus thrombosis acute cocaine use

Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient

bull History

1-characterize the dizziness

2-onset of vertigo

3-duration of vertigo

4-accompanying symptoms

5-stroke risk factors

bull Exam

-Characterize nystagmus

-Gait

-Other neurologic findings

-add to your repertoire

-head thrust test

-vertical pursuit

-skew deviation

  • Evaluating the acutely dizzy patient
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Dizziness the problem
  • The dizzy patient history
  • Peripheral vs Central
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus
  • Vertigo exam nystagmus
  • What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic
  • Vertigo exam gait
  • Vertigo Exam other findings
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Neuro-imaging
  • So who needs an acute work-up
  • Approach 1 Forego MRI if
  • Approach 2Obtain MRI if
  • Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology
  • Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient
Page 12: Evaluating the acutely dizzy patientdepts.washington.edu/uwmedres/program/conferences/... · vestibular nystagmusthat is suppressed by visual fixation, and is unstable but can still

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 2 onset of vertigo

bull Question 3 duration of vertigo

bull Question 4 accompanying symptomsndash Nausea vomiting (not very helpful)

ndash Tinnitus hearing loss

ndash Headache

ndash Weakness numbness

ndash Swallowing difficulty hiccups hoarseness

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 5 stroke risk factorsndash Prior strokeTIA Hypertension Diabetes

hyperlipidemia atrial-fibrillation smoking age

ndash Hemorrhagic CVA risk factors (meds)

ndash Other Cocaine use trauma stroke-prone disease (Lupus Hyper-coaguable state)

Etiology of peripheral vertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Vestibular neuritis

Acute vsevolves over hours

Days to weeks

No NV unsteadinessTinnitus +-

Labyrinthitis Acute vsevolves over hours

Days to weeks

Yes NV unsteadinessTinnitus +-

BPPV Acute Intermittent brief seconds

No N unsteadiness

Menierersquos disease

Acute Hours Maybe NV unsteadiness tinnitus +-

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellarinfarct PICA

Acute days-yrs no NV falls

Cerebellar infarctAICA

Acute days-yrs yes NV falls

Brainstem infarct Acute days-yrs no many

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellarinfarct PICA

Acute days-yrs no NV falls

Cerebellar infarctAICA

Acute days-yrs yes NV falls

Brainstem infarct Acute days-yrs no many

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellar TIAPICA

Acute minutes no NV falls

Cerebellar TIAAICA

Acute minutes yes NV falls

Brainstem TIA Acute minutes no many

Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus

bull Horizontal vs vertical

bull Direction ndash characterize it by the fast component

bull Does the direction change depending on direction of gaze

Vertigo exam nystagmusCharacteristics of peripheral nystagmus

bull Horizontal

bull Unidirectionalndash Fast phase always in same

direction

bull Improves with fixation

bull Worsens with removing fixation ndash Ophthalmoscope cover

fixating eye

Characteristics of central nystagmus

bull Horizontal or vertical or purely torsional

bull Uni or multi-directionalndash Fast phase may change with

direction of gaze

bull Does not improve with fixation

bull No change with removing fixation

What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic

bull Perform Hallpike Dix manuver to try to trigger nystagmus

bull Consider head thrust test correctional saccade is a sign of peripheral lesion

Vertigo exam gait

bull Peripheral vertigo patient leansveers toward side of lesion may fall this way on Romberg testingndash Instruct patient to falllean in the direction they feel

like fallingleaning (rather than compensating)ndash ldquounidirectional postural instability with preserved

walkingrdquo Hotson et al NEJM 1998

bull Central vertigondash often canrsquot walk without fallingndash May leanfall in more than one direction

Vertigo Exam other findings

bull Cranial nervesndash 2 funduscopic exam disc edema

pupils Hornerrsquosndash 3 Skew deviation (vertical misalignment) extraocular movements

cover-uncoverVertical smooth pursuit saccadic interruptions

ndash 5 impaired pain and temperature (ipsilateral)ndash 7 face weaknessndash 3 6 8 Head thrust test nystagmus ndash 9 10 hoarseness unilateral decreased palate elevation unilateral loss

of gagbull Motor unilateral weaknessbull Sensory impaired pain and temperature classically contralateral to

facebull Coordination impaired finger-nose-finger HKS inability to walk

Pract Neurol201010129-139 doi101136jnnp2010211607 ReviewChronic dizziness a practical approach Bronstein AM et al

+

Exam finding Central lesion Vestibularneuritis

Groupdifference

Vertical saccadicpursuit

88 20 p lt 01

Gaze evokednystagmus

56 17 p lt 01

Skew deviation

40 0 p lt 01

Positive head thrust sign

39 82 plt 01

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008 Apr79(4)458-60Bedside differentiation of vestibular neuritis from central vestibular pseudoneuritis

Cnyrim CD Newman-Toker D Karch C Brandt T Strupp M

Neuro-imaging

bull Head CT will rule out hemorrhagendash Negative head CT does not rule out acute ischemic

stroke

bull Brain MRI is the best study

So who needs an acute work-up

bull No bright line rulebull Factors in favor of acute work-up

ndash stroke risk factors (including age gt50) and acute onset vertigondash Headachendash Additional neurologic complaints (besides nv hearing loss

tinnitus)ndash focal finding on neuro exam

bull Factors in favor of foregoing MRIndash Unidirectional horizontal nystagmus that improves with fixationndash Unilateral hearing loss tinnitus without other neurologic signs ndash ABSENCE OF STROKE RISK FACTORS ndash Absence of focal findings on neuro exam

Approach 1 Forego MRI if

A patient has isolated acute vertigo peripheral vestibular nystagmus that is suppressed by visual fixation and is unstable but can still walk ok to defer MRI for 48 hours Substantial improvement in 48 hours is consistent with vestibular neuritis and brain imaging is not necessary Hotson et al NEJM 1998

Approach 2Obtain MRI if

1-acute or subacute onset of prolonged vertigo and postural imbalance and2-horizontal spontaneous nystagmus 3-AND one or more of the following

ndash Skew deviationndash Gaze evoked nystagmus (opposite to the direction of

spontaneous nystagmus)ndash Vertical saccadic pursuitndash Normal head thrust test ORndash Severe or multiple vascular risk factorsCnyrim et al J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2008

Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology

bull Cardio-embolic

bull Large vessel atherosclerosis

bull Vertebral artery dissection (especially in young patients)

bull Small vessel disease

bull Artery-artery embolismbull Hypercoaguable states vasculitis venous sinus thrombosis acute cocaine use

Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient

bull History

1-characterize the dizziness

2-onset of vertigo

3-duration of vertigo

4-accompanying symptoms

5-stroke risk factors

bull Exam

-Characterize nystagmus

-Gait

-Other neurologic findings

-add to your repertoire

-head thrust test

-vertical pursuit

-skew deviation

  • Evaluating the acutely dizzy patient
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Dizziness the problem
  • The dizzy patient history
  • Peripheral vs Central
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus
  • Vertigo exam nystagmus
  • What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic
  • Vertigo exam gait
  • Vertigo Exam other findings
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Neuro-imaging
  • So who needs an acute work-up
  • Approach 1 Forego MRI if
  • Approach 2Obtain MRI if
  • Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology
  • Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient
Page 13: Evaluating the acutely dizzy patientdepts.washington.edu/uwmedres/program/conferences/... · vestibular nystagmusthat is suppressed by visual fixation, and is unstable but can still

History patient with vertigo

bull Question 5 stroke risk factorsndash Prior strokeTIA Hypertension Diabetes

hyperlipidemia atrial-fibrillation smoking age

ndash Hemorrhagic CVA risk factors (meds)

ndash Other Cocaine use trauma stroke-prone disease (Lupus Hyper-coaguable state)

Etiology of peripheral vertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Vestibular neuritis

Acute vsevolves over hours

Days to weeks

No NV unsteadinessTinnitus +-

Labyrinthitis Acute vsevolves over hours

Days to weeks

Yes NV unsteadinessTinnitus +-

BPPV Acute Intermittent brief seconds

No N unsteadiness

Menierersquos disease

Acute Hours Maybe NV unsteadiness tinnitus +-

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellarinfarct PICA

Acute days-yrs no NV falls

Cerebellar infarctAICA

Acute days-yrs yes NV falls

Brainstem infarct Acute days-yrs no many

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellarinfarct PICA

Acute days-yrs no NV falls

Cerebellar infarctAICA

Acute days-yrs yes NV falls

Brainstem infarct Acute days-yrs no many

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellar TIAPICA

Acute minutes no NV falls

Cerebellar TIAAICA

Acute minutes yes NV falls

Brainstem TIA Acute minutes no many

Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus

bull Horizontal vs vertical

bull Direction ndash characterize it by the fast component

bull Does the direction change depending on direction of gaze

Vertigo exam nystagmusCharacteristics of peripheral nystagmus

bull Horizontal

bull Unidirectionalndash Fast phase always in same

direction

bull Improves with fixation

bull Worsens with removing fixation ndash Ophthalmoscope cover

fixating eye

Characteristics of central nystagmus

bull Horizontal or vertical or purely torsional

bull Uni or multi-directionalndash Fast phase may change with

direction of gaze

bull Does not improve with fixation

bull No change with removing fixation

What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic

bull Perform Hallpike Dix manuver to try to trigger nystagmus

bull Consider head thrust test correctional saccade is a sign of peripheral lesion

Vertigo exam gait

bull Peripheral vertigo patient leansveers toward side of lesion may fall this way on Romberg testingndash Instruct patient to falllean in the direction they feel

like fallingleaning (rather than compensating)ndash ldquounidirectional postural instability with preserved

walkingrdquo Hotson et al NEJM 1998

bull Central vertigondash often canrsquot walk without fallingndash May leanfall in more than one direction

Vertigo Exam other findings

bull Cranial nervesndash 2 funduscopic exam disc edema

pupils Hornerrsquosndash 3 Skew deviation (vertical misalignment) extraocular movements

cover-uncoverVertical smooth pursuit saccadic interruptions

ndash 5 impaired pain and temperature (ipsilateral)ndash 7 face weaknessndash 3 6 8 Head thrust test nystagmus ndash 9 10 hoarseness unilateral decreased palate elevation unilateral loss

of gagbull Motor unilateral weaknessbull Sensory impaired pain and temperature classically contralateral to

facebull Coordination impaired finger-nose-finger HKS inability to walk

Pract Neurol201010129-139 doi101136jnnp2010211607 ReviewChronic dizziness a practical approach Bronstein AM et al

+

Exam finding Central lesion Vestibularneuritis

Groupdifference

Vertical saccadicpursuit

88 20 p lt 01

Gaze evokednystagmus

56 17 p lt 01

Skew deviation

40 0 p lt 01

Positive head thrust sign

39 82 plt 01

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008 Apr79(4)458-60Bedside differentiation of vestibular neuritis from central vestibular pseudoneuritis

Cnyrim CD Newman-Toker D Karch C Brandt T Strupp M

Neuro-imaging

bull Head CT will rule out hemorrhagendash Negative head CT does not rule out acute ischemic

stroke

bull Brain MRI is the best study

So who needs an acute work-up

bull No bright line rulebull Factors in favor of acute work-up

ndash stroke risk factors (including age gt50) and acute onset vertigondash Headachendash Additional neurologic complaints (besides nv hearing loss

tinnitus)ndash focal finding on neuro exam

bull Factors in favor of foregoing MRIndash Unidirectional horizontal nystagmus that improves with fixationndash Unilateral hearing loss tinnitus without other neurologic signs ndash ABSENCE OF STROKE RISK FACTORS ndash Absence of focal findings on neuro exam

Approach 1 Forego MRI if

A patient has isolated acute vertigo peripheral vestibular nystagmus that is suppressed by visual fixation and is unstable but can still walk ok to defer MRI for 48 hours Substantial improvement in 48 hours is consistent with vestibular neuritis and brain imaging is not necessary Hotson et al NEJM 1998

Approach 2Obtain MRI if

1-acute or subacute onset of prolonged vertigo and postural imbalance and2-horizontal spontaneous nystagmus 3-AND one or more of the following

ndash Skew deviationndash Gaze evoked nystagmus (opposite to the direction of

spontaneous nystagmus)ndash Vertical saccadic pursuitndash Normal head thrust test ORndash Severe or multiple vascular risk factorsCnyrim et al J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2008

Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology

bull Cardio-embolic

bull Large vessel atherosclerosis

bull Vertebral artery dissection (especially in young patients)

bull Small vessel disease

bull Artery-artery embolismbull Hypercoaguable states vasculitis venous sinus thrombosis acute cocaine use

Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient

bull History

1-characterize the dizziness

2-onset of vertigo

3-duration of vertigo

4-accompanying symptoms

5-stroke risk factors

bull Exam

-Characterize nystagmus

-Gait

-Other neurologic findings

-add to your repertoire

-head thrust test

-vertical pursuit

-skew deviation

  • Evaluating the acutely dizzy patient
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Dizziness the problem
  • The dizzy patient history
  • Peripheral vs Central
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus
  • Vertigo exam nystagmus
  • What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic
  • Vertigo exam gait
  • Vertigo Exam other findings
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Neuro-imaging
  • So who needs an acute work-up
  • Approach 1 Forego MRI if
  • Approach 2Obtain MRI if
  • Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology
  • Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient
Page 14: Evaluating the acutely dizzy patientdepts.washington.edu/uwmedres/program/conferences/... · vestibular nystagmusthat is suppressed by visual fixation, and is unstable but can still

Etiology of peripheral vertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Vestibular neuritis

Acute vsevolves over hours

Days to weeks

No NV unsteadinessTinnitus +-

Labyrinthitis Acute vsevolves over hours

Days to weeks

Yes NV unsteadinessTinnitus +-

BPPV Acute Intermittent brief seconds

No N unsteadiness

Menierersquos disease

Acute Hours Maybe NV unsteadiness tinnitus +-

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellarinfarct PICA

Acute days-yrs no NV falls

Cerebellar infarctAICA

Acute days-yrs yes NV falls

Brainstem infarct Acute days-yrs no many

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellarinfarct PICA

Acute days-yrs no NV falls

Cerebellar infarctAICA

Acute days-yrs yes NV falls

Brainstem infarct Acute days-yrs no many

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellar TIAPICA

Acute minutes no NV falls

Cerebellar TIAAICA

Acute minutes yes NV falls

Brainstem TIA Acute minutes no many

Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus

bull Horizontal vs vertical

bull Direction ndash characterize it by the fast component

bull Does the direction change depending on direction of gaze

Vertigo exam nystagmusCharacteristics of peripheral nystagmus

bull Horizontal

bull Unidirectionalndash Fast phase always in same

direction

bull Improves with fixation

bull Worsens with removing fixation ndash Ophthalmoscope cover

fixating eye

Characteristics of central nystagmus

bull Horizontal or vertical or purely torsional

bull Uni or multi-directionalndash Fast phase may change with

direction of gaze

bull Does not improve with fixation

bull No change with removing fixation

What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic

bull Perform Hallpike Dix manuver to try to trigger nystagmus

bull Consider head thrust test correctional saccade is a sign of peripheral lesion

Vertigo exam gait

bull Peripheral vertigo patient leansveers toward side of lesion may fall this way on Romberg testingndash Instruct patient to falllean in the direction they feel

like fallingleaning (rather than compensating)ndash ldquounidirectional postural instability with preserved

walkingrdquo Hotson et al NEJM 1998

bull Central vertigondash often canrsquot walk without fallingndash May leanfall in more than one direction

Vertigo Exam other findings

bull Cranial nervesndash 2 funduscopic exam disc edema

pupils Hornerrsquosndash 3 Skew deviation (vertical misalignment) extraocular movements

cover-uncoverVertical smooth pursuit saccadic interruptions

ndash 5 impaired pain and temperature (ipsilateral)ndash 7 face weaknessndash 3 6 8 Head thrust test nystagmus ndash 9 10 hoarseness unilateral decreased palate elevation unilateral loss

of gagbull Motor unilateral weaknessbull Sensory impaired pain and temperature classically contralateral to

facebull Coordination impaired finger-nose-finger HKS inability to walk

Pract Neurol201010129-139 doi101136jnnp2010211607 ReviewChronic dizziness a practical approach Bronstein AM et al

+

Exam finding Central lesion Vestibularneuritis

Groupdifference

Vertical saccadicpursuit

88 20 p lt 01

Gaze evokednystagmus

56 17 p lt 01

Skew deviation

40 0 p lt 01

Positive head thrust sign

39 82 plt 01

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008 Apr79(4)458-60Bedside differentiation of vestibular neuritis from central vestibular pseudoneuritis

Cnyrim CD Newman-Toker D Karch C Brandt T Strupp M

Neuro-imaging

bull Head CT will rule out hemorrhagendash Negative head CT does not rule out acute ischemic

stroke

bull Brain MRI is the best study

So who needs an acute work-up

bull No bright line rulebull Factors in favor of acute work-up

ndash stroke risk factors (including age gt50) and acute onset vertigondash Headachendash Additional neurologic complaints (besides nv hearing loss

tinnitus)ndash focal finding on neuro exam

bull Factors in favor of foregoing MRIndash Unidirectional horizontal nystagmus that improves with fixationndash Unilateral hearing loss tinnitus without other neurologic signs ndash ABSENCE OF STROKE RISK FACTORS ndash Absence of focal findings on neuro exam

Approach 1 Forego MRI if

A patient has isolated acute vertigo peripheral vestibular nystagmus that is suppressed by visual fixation and is unstable but can still walk ok to defer MRI for 48 hours Substantial improvement in 48 hours is consistent with vestibular neuritis and brain imaging is not necessary Hotson et al NEJM 1998

Approach 2Obtain MRI if

1-acute or subacute onset of prolonged vertigo and postural imbalance and2-horizontal spontaneous nystagmus 3-AND one or more of the following

ndash Skew deviationndash Gaze evoked nystagmus (opposite to the direction of

spontaneous nystagmus)ndash Vertical saccadic pursuitndash Normal head thrust test ORndash Severe or multiple vascular risk factorsCnyrim et al J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2008

Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology

bull Cardio-embolic

bull Large vessel atherosclerosis

bull Vertebral artery dissection (especially in young patients)

bull Small vessel disease

bull Artery-artery embolismbull Hypercoaguable states vasculitis venous sinus thrombosis acute cocaine use

Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient

bull History

1-characterize the dizziness

2-onset of vertigo

3-duration of vertigo

4-accompanying symptoms

5-stroke risk factors

bull Exam

-Characterize nystagmus

-Gait

-Other neurologic findings

-add to your repertoire

-head thrust test

-vertical pursuit

-skew deviation

  • Evaluating the acutely dizzy patient
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Dizziness the problem
  • The dizzy patient history
  • Peripheral vs Central
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus
  • Vertigo exam nystagmus
  • What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic
  • Vertigo exam gait
  • Vertigo Exam other findings
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Neuro-imaging
  • So who needs an acute work-up
  • Approach 1 Forego MRI if
  • Approach 2Obtain MRI if
  • Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology
  • Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient
Page 15: Evaluating the acutely dizzy patientdepts.washington.edu/uwmedres/program/conferences/... · vestibular nystagmusthat is suppressed by visual fixation, and is unstable but can still

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellarinfarct PICA

Acute days-yrs no NV falls

Cerebellar infarctAICA

Acute days-yrs yes NV falls

Brainstem infarct Acute days-yrs no many

Etiology of centralvertigo

Onset Duration Hearing impaired

Other symptoms

Cerebellar TIAPICA

Acute minutes no NV falls

Cerebellar TIAAICA

Acute minutes yes NV falls

Brainstem TIA Acute minutes no many

Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus

bull Horizontal vs vertical

bull Direction ndash characterize it by the fast component

bull Does the direction change depending on direction of gaze

Vertigo exam nystagmusCharacteristics of peripheral nystagmus

bull Horizontal

bull Unidirectionalndash Fast phase always in same

direction

bull Improves with fixation

bull Worsens with removing fixation ndash Ophthalmoscope cover

fixating eye

Characteristics of central nystagmus

bull Horizontal or vertical or purely torsional

bull Uni or multi-directionalndash Fast phase may change with

direction of gaze

bull Does not improve with fixation

bull No change with removing fixation

What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic

bull Perform Hallpike Dix manuver to try to trigger nystagmus

bull Consider head thrust test correctional saccade is a sign of peripheral lesion

Vertigo exam gait

bull Peripheral vertigo patient leansveers toward side of lesion may fall this way on Romberg testingndash Instruct patient to falllean in the direction they feel

like fallingleaning (rather than compensating)ndash ldquounidirectional postural instability with preserved

walkingrdquo Hotson et al NEJM 1998

bull Central vertigondash often canrsquot walk without fallingndash May leanfall in more than one direction

Vertigo Exam other findings

bull Cranial nervesndash 2 funduscopic exam disc edema

pupils Hornerrsquosndash 3 Skew deviation (vertical misalignment) extraocular movements

cover-uncoverVertical smooth pursuit saccadic interruptions

ndash 5 impaired pain and temperature (ipsilateral)ndash 7 face weaknessndash 3 6 8 Head thrust test nystagmus ndash 9 10 hoarseness unilateral decreased palate elevation unilateral loss

of gagbull Motor unilateral weaknessbull Sensory impaired pain and temperature classically contralateral to

facebull Coordination impaired finger-nose-finger HKS inability to walk

Pract Neurol201010129-139 doi101136jnnp2010211607 ReviewChronic dizziness a practical approach Bronstein AM et al

+

Exam finding Central lesion Vestibularneuritis

Groupdifference

Vertical saccadicpursuit

88 20 p lt 01

Gaze evokednystagmus

56 17 p lt 01

Skew deviation

40 0 p lt 01

Positive head thrust sign

39 82 plt 01

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008 Apr79(4)458-60Bedside differentiation of vestibular neuritis from central vestibular pseudoneuritis

Cnyrim CD Newman-Toker D Karch C Brandt T Strupp M

Neuro-imaging

bull Head CT will rule out hemorrhagendash Negative head CT does not rule out acute ischemic

stroke

bull Brain MRI is the best study

So who needs an acute work-up

bull No bright line rulebull Factors in favor of acute work-up

ndash stroke risk factors (including age gt50) and acute onset vertigondash Headachendash Additional neurologic complaints (besides nv hearing loss

tinnitus)ndash focal finding on neuro exam

bull Factors in favor of foregoing MRIndash Unidirectional horizontal nystagmus that improves with fixationndash Unilateral hearing loss tinnitus without other neurologic signs ndash ABSENCE OF STROKE RISK FACTORS ndash Absence of focal findings on neuro exam

Approach 1 Forego MRI if

A patient has isolated acute vertigo peripheral vestibular nystagmus that is suppressed by visual fixation and is unstable but can still walk ok to defer MRI for 48 hours Substantial improvement in 48 hours is consistent with vestibular neuritis and brain imaging is not necessary Hotson et al NEJM 1998

Approach 2Obtain MRI if

1-acute or subacute onset of prolonged vertigo and postural imbalance and2-horizontal spontaneous nystagmus 3-AND one or more of the following

ndash Skew deviationndash Gaze evoked nystagmus (opposite to the direction of

spontaneous nystagmus)ndash Vertical saccadic pursuitndash Normal head thrust test ORndash Severe or multiple vascular risk factorsCnyrim et al J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2008

Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology

bull Cardio-embolic

bull Large vessel atherosclerosis

bull Vertebral artery dissection (especially in young patients)

bull Small vessel disease

bull Artery-artery embolismbull Hypercoaguable states vasculitis venous sinus thrombosis acute cocaine use

Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient

bull History

1-characterize the dizziness

2-onset of vertigo

3-duration of vertigo

4-accompanying symptoms

5-stroke risk factors

bull Exam

-Characterize nystagmus

-Gait

-Other neurologic findings

-add to your repertoire

-head thrust test

-vertical pursuit

-skew deviation

  • Evaluating the acutely dizzy patient
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Dizziness the problem
  • The dizzy patient history
  • Peripheral vs Central
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus
  • Vertigo exam nystagmus
  • What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic
  • Vertigo exam gait
  • Vertigo Exam other findings
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Neuro-imaging
  • So who needs an acute work-up
  • Approach 1 Forego MRI if
  • Approach 2Obtain MRI if
  • Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology
  • Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient
Page 16: Evaluating the acutely dizzy patientdepts.washington.edu/uwmedres/program/conferences/... · vestibular nystagmusthat is suppressed by visual fixation, and is unstable but can still

Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus

bull Horizontal vs vertical

bull Direction ndash characterize it by the fast component

bull Does the direction change depending on direction of gaze

Vertigo exam nystagmusCharacteristics of peripheral nystagmus

bull Horizontal

bull Unidirectionalndash Fast phase always in same

direction

bull Improves with fixation

bull Worsens with removing fixation ndash Ophthalmoscope cover

fixating eye

Characteristics of central nystagmus

bull Horizontal or vertical or purely torsional

bull Uni or multi-directionalndash Fast phase may change with

direction of gaze

bull Does not improve with fixation

bull No change with removing fixation

What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic

bull Perform Hallpike Dix manuver to try to trigger nystagmus

bull Consider head thrust test correctional saccade is a sign of peripheral lesion

Vertigo exam gait

bull Peripheral vertigo patient leansveers toward side of lesion may fall this way on Romberg testingndash Instruct patient to falllean in the direction they feel

like fallingleaning (rather than compensating)ndash ldquounidirectional postural instability with preserved

walkingrdquo Hotson et al NEJM 1998

bull Central vertigondash often canrsquot walk without fallingndash May leanfall in more than one direction

Vertigo Exam other findings

bull Cranial nervesndash 2 funduscopic exam disc edema

pupils Hornerrsquosndash 3 Skew deviation (vertical misalignment) extraocular movements

cover-uncoverVertical smooth pursuit saccadic interruptions

ndash 5 impaired pain and temperature (ipsilateral)ndash 7 face weaknessndash 3 6 8 Head thrust test nystagmus ndash 9 10 hoarseness unilateral decreased palate elevation unilateral loss

of gagbull Motor unilateral weaknessbull Sensory impaired pain and temperature classically contralateral to

facebull Coordination impaired finger-nose-finger HKS inability to walk

Pract Neurol201010129-139 doi101136jnnp2010211607 ReviewChronic dizziness a practical approach Bronstein AM et al

+

Exam finding Central lesion Vestibularneuritis

Groupdifference

Vertical saccadicpursuit

88 20 p lt 01

Gaze evokednystagmus

56 17 p lt 01

Skew deviation

40 0 p lt 01

Positive head thrust sign

39 82 plt 01

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008 Apr79(4)458-60Bedside differentiation of vestibular neuritis from central vestibular pseudoneuritis

Cnyrim CD Newman-Toker D Karch C Brandt T Strupp M

Neuro-imaging

bull Head CT will rule out hemorrhagendash Negative head CT does not rule out acute ischemic

stroke

bull Brain MRI is the best study

So who needs an acute work-up

bull No bright line rulebull Factors in favor of acute work-up

ndash stroke risk factors (including age gt50) and acute onset vertigondash Headachendash Additional neurologic complaints (besides nv hearing loss

tinnitus)ndash focal finding on neuro exam

bull Factors in favor of foregoing MRIndash Unidirectional horizontal nystagmus that improves with fixationndash Unilateral hearing loss tinnitus without other neurologic signs ndash ABSENCE OF STROKE RISK FACTORS ndash Absence of focal findings on neuro exam

Approach 1 Forego MRI if

A patient has isolated acute vertigo peripheral vestibular nystagmus that is suppressed by visual fixation and is unstable but can still walk ok to defer MRI for 48 hours Substantial improvement in 48 hours is consistent with vestibular neuritis and brain imaging is not necessary Hotson et al NEJM 1998

Approach 2Obtain MRI if

1-acute or subacute onset of prolonged vertigo and postural imbalance and2-horizontal spontaneous nystagmus 3-AND one or more of the following

ndash Skew deviationndash Gaze evoked nystagmus (opposite to the direction of

spontaneous nystagmus)ndash Vertical saccadic pursuitndash Normal head thrust test ORndash Severe or multiple vascular risk factorsCnyrim et al J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2008

Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology

bull Cardio-embolic

bull Large vessel atherosclerosis

bull Vertebral artery dissection (especially in young patients)

bull Small vessel disease

bull Artery-artery embolismbull Hypercoaguable states vasculitis venous sinus thrombosis acute cocaine use

Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient

bull History

1-characterize the dizziness

2-onset of vertigo

3-duration of vertigo

4-accompanying symptoms

5-stroke risk factors

bull Exam

-Characterize nystagmus

-Gait

-Other neurologic findings

-add to your repertoire

-head thrust test

-vertical pursuit

-skew deviation

  • Evaluating the acutely dizzy patient
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Dizziness the problem
  • The dizzy patient history
  • Peripheral vs Central
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus
  • Vertigo exam nystagmus
  • What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic
  • Vertigo exam gait
  • Vertigo Exam other findings
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Neuro-imaging
  • So who needs an acute work-up
  • Approach 1 Forego MRI if
  • Approach 2Obtain MRI if
  • Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology
  • Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient
Page 17: Evaluating the acutely dizzy patientdepts.washington.edu/uwmedres/program/conferences/... · vestibular nystagmusthat is suppressed by visual fixation, and is unstable but can still

Vertigo exam nystagmusCharacteristics of peripheral nystagmus

bull Horizontal

bull Unidirectionalndash Fast phase always in same

direction

bull Improves with fixation

bull Worsens with removing fixation ndash Ophthalmoscope cover

fixating eye

Characteristics of central nystagmus

bull Horizontal or vertical or purely torsional

bull Uni or multi-directionalndash Fast phase may change with

direction of gaze

bull Does not improve with fixation

bull No change with removing fixation

What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic

bull Perform Hallpike Dix manuver to try to trigger nystagmus

bull Consider head thrust test correctional saccade is a sign of peripheral lesion

Vertigo exam gait

bull Peripheral vertigo patient leansveers toward side of lesion may fall this way on Romberg testingndash Instruct patient to falllean in the direction they feel

like fallingleaning (rather than compensating)ndash ldquounidirectional postural instability with preserved

walkingrdquo Hotson et al NEJM 1998

bull Central vertigondash often canrsquot walk without fallingndash May leanfall in more than one direction

Vertigo Exam other findings

bull Cranial nervesndash 2 funduscopic exam disc edema

pupils Hornerrsquosndash 3 Skew deviation (vertical misalignment) extraocular movements

cover-uncoverVertical smooth pursuit saccadic interruptions

ndash 5 impaired pain and temperature (ipsilateral)ndash 7 face weaknessndash 3 6 8 Head thrust test nystagmus ndash 9 10 hoarseness unilateral decreased palate elevation unilateral loss

of gagbull Motor unilateral weaknessbull Sensory impaired pain and temperature classically contralateral to

facebull Coordination impaired finger-nose-finger HKS inability to walk

Pract Neurol201010129-139 doi101136jnnp2010211607 ReviewChronic dizziness a practical approach Bronstein AM et al

+

Exam finding Central lesion Vestibularneuritis

Groupdifference

Vertical saccadicpursuit

88 20 p lt 01

Gaze evokednystagmus

56 17 p lt 01

Skew deviation

40 0 p lt 01

Positive head thrust sign

39 82 plt 01

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008 Apr79(4)458-60Bedside differentiation of vestibular neuritis from central vestibular pseudoneuritis

Cnyrim CD Newman-Toker D Karch C Brandt T Strupp M

Neuro-imaging

bull Head CT will rule out hemorrhagendash Negative head CT does not rule out acute ischemic

stroke

bull Brain MRI is the best study

So who needs an acute work-up

bull No bright line rulebull Factors in favor of acute work-up

ndash stroke risk factors (including age gt50) and acute onset vertigondash Headachendash Additional neurologic complaints (besides nv hearing loss

tinnitus)ndash focal finding on neuro exam

bull Factors in favor of foregoing MRIndash Unidirectional horizontal nystagmus that improves with fixationndash Unilateral hearing loss tinnitus without other neurologic signs ndash ABSENCE OF STROKE RISK FACTORS ndash Absence of focal findings on neuro exam

Approach 1 Forego MRI if

A patient has isolated acute vertigo peripheral vestibular nystagmus that is suppressed by visual fixation and is unstable but can still walk ok to defer MRI for 48 hours Substantial improvement in 48 hours is consistent with vestibular neuritis and brain imaging is not necessary Hotson et al NEJM 1998

Approach 2Obtain MRI if

1-acute or subacute onset of prolonged vertigo and postural imbalance and2-horizontal spontaneous nystagmus 3-AND one or more of the following

ndash Skew deviationndash Gaze evoked nystagmus (opposite to the direction of

spontaneous nystagmus)ndash Vertical saccadic pursuitndash Normal head thrust test ORndash Severe or multiple vascular risk factorsCnyrim et al J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2008

Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology

bull Cardio-embolic

bull Large vessel atherosclerosis

bull Vertebral artery dissection (especially in young patients)

bull Small vessel disease

bull Artery-artery embolismbull Hypercoaguable states vasculitis venous sinus thrombosis acute cocaine use

Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient

bull History

1-characterize the dizziness

2-onset of vertigo

3-duration of vertigo

4-accompanying symptoms

5-stroke risk factors

bull Exam

-Characterize nystagmus

-Gait

-Other neurologic findings

-add to your repertoire

-head thrust test

-vertical pursuit

-skew deviation

  • Evaluating the acutely dizzy patient
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Dizziness the problem
  • The dizzy patient history
  • Peripheral vs Central
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus
  • Vertigo exam nystagmus
  • What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic
  • Vertigo exam gait
  • Vertigo Exam other findings
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Neuro-imaging
  • So who needs an acute work-up
  • Approach 1 Forego MRI if
  • Approach 2Obtain MRI if
  • Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology
  • Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient
Page 18: Evaluating the acutely dizzy patientdepts.washington.edu/uwmedres/program/conferences/... · vestibular nystagmusthat is suppressed by visual fixation, and is unstable but can still

What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic

bull Perform Hallpike Dix manuver to try to trigger nystagmus

bull Consider head thrust test correctional saccade is a sign of peripheral lesion

Vertigo exam gait

bull Peripheral vertigo patient leansveers toward side of lesion may fall this way on Romberg testingndash Instruct patient to falllean in the direction they feel

like fallingleaning (rather than compensating)ndash ldquounidirectional postural instability with preserved

walkingrdquo Hotson et al NEJM 1998

bull Central vertigondash often canrsquot walk without fallingndash May leanfall in more than one direction

Vertigo Exam other findings

bull Cranial nervesndash 2 funduscopic exam disc edema

pupils Hornerrsquosndash 3 Skew deviation (vertical misalignment) extraocular movements

cover-uncoverVertical smooth pursuit saccadic interruptions

ndash 5 impaired pain and temperature (ipsilateral)ndash 7 face weaknessndash 3 6 8 Head thrust test nystagmus ndash 9 10 hoarseness unilateral decreased palate elevation unilateral loss

of gagbull Motor unilateral weaknessbull Sensory impaired pain and temperature classically contralateral to

facebull Coordination impaired finger-nose-finger HKS inability to walk

Pract Neurol201010129-139 doi101136jnnp2010211607 ReviewChronic dizziness a practical approach Bronstein AM et al

+

Exam finding Central lesion Vestibularneuritis

Groupdifference

Vertical saccadicpursuit

88 20 p lt 01

Gaze evokednystagmus

56 17 p lt 01

Skew deviation

40 0 p lt 01

Positive head thrust sign

39 82 plt 01

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008 Apr79(4)458-60Bedside differentiation of vestibular neuritis from central vestibular pseudoneuritis

Cnyrim CD Newman-Toker D Karch C Brandt T Strupp M

Neuro-imaging

bull Head CT will rule out hemorrhagendash Negative head CT does not rule out acute ischemic

stroke

bull Brain MRI is the best study

So who needs an acute work-up

bull No bright line rulebull Factors in favor of acute work-up

ndash stroke risk factors (including age gt50) and acute onset vertigondash Headachendash Additional neurologic complaints (besides nv hearing loss

tinnitus)ndash focal finding on neuro exam

bull Factors in favor of foregoing MRIndash Unidirectional horizontal nystagmus that improves with fixationndash Unilateral hearing loss tinnitus without other neurologic signs ndash ABSENCE OF STROKE RISK FACTORS ndash Absence of focal findings on neuro exam

Approach 1 Forego MRI if

A patient has isolated acute vertigo peripheral vestibular nystagmus that is suppressed by visual fixation and is unstable but can still walk ok to defer MRI for 48 hours Substantial improvement in 48 hours is consistent with vestibular neuritis and brain imaging is not necessary Hotson et al NEJM 1998

Approach 2Obtain MRI if

1-acute or subacute onset of prolonged vertigo and postural imbalance and2-horizontal spontaneous nystagmus 3-AND one or more of the following

ndash Skew deviationndash Gaze evoked nystagmus (opposite to the direction of

spontaneous nystagmus)ndash Vertical saccadic pursuitndash Normal head thrust test ORndash Severe or multiple vascular risk factorsCnyrim et al J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2008

Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology

bull Cardio-embolic

bull Large vessel atherosclerosis

bull Vertebral artery dissection (especially in young patients)

bull Small vessel disease

bull Artery-artery embolismbull Hypercoaguable states vasculitis venous sinus thrombosis acute cocaine use

Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient

bull History

1-characterize the dizziness

2-onset of vertigo

3-duration of vertigo

4-accompanying symptoms

5-stroke risk factors

bull Exam

-Characterize nystagmus

-Gait

-Other neurologic findings

-add to your repertoire

-head thrust test

-vertical pursuit

-skew deviation

  • Evaluating the acutely dizzy patient
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Dizziness the problem
  • The dizzy patient history
  • Peripheral vs Central
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus
  • Vertigo exam nystagmus
  • What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic
  • Vertigo exam gait
  • Vertigo Exam other findings
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Neuro-imaging
  • So who needs an acute work-up
  • Approach 1 Forego MRI if
  • Approach 2Obtain MRI if
  • Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology
  • Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient
Page 19: Evaluating the acutely dizzy patientdepts.washington.edu/uwmedres/program/conferences/... · vestibular nystagmusthat is suppressed by visual fixation, and is unstable but can still

Vertigo exam gait

bull Peripheral vertigo patient leansveers toward side of lesion may fall this way on Romberg testingndash Instruct patient to falllean in the direction they feel

like fallingleaning (rather than compensating)ndash ldquounidirectional postural instability with preserved

walkingrdquo Hotson et al NEJM 1998

bull Central vertigondash often canrsquot walk without fallingndash May leanfall in more than one direction

Vertigo Exam other findings

bull Cranial nervesndash 2 funduscopic exam disc edema

pupils Hornerrsquosndash 3 Skew deviation (vertical misalignment) extraocular movements

cover-uncoverVertical smooth pursuit saccadic interruptions

ndash 5 impaired pain and temperature (ipsilateral)ndash 7 face weaknessndash 3 6 8 Head thrust test nystagmus ndash 9 10 hoarseness unilateral decreased palate elevation unilateral loss

of gagbull Motor unilateral weaknessbull Sensory impaired pain and temperature classically contralateral to

facebull Coordination impaired finger-nose-finger HKS inability to walk

Pract Neurol201010129-139 doi101136jnnp2010211607 ReviewChronic dizziness a practical approach Bronstein AM et al

+

Exam finding Central lesion Vestibularneuritis

Groupdifference

Vertical saccadicpursuit

88 20 p lt 01

Gaze evokednystagmus

56 17 p lt 01

Skew deviation

40 0 p lt 01

Positive head thrust sign

39 82 plt 01

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008 Apr79(4)458-60Bedside differentiation of vestibular neuritis from central vestibular pseudoneuritis

Cnyrim CD Newman-Toker D Karch C Brandt T Strupp M

Neuro-imaging

bull Head CT will rule out hemorrhagendash Negative head CT does not rule out acute ischemic

stroke

bull Brain MRI is the best study

So who needs an acute work-up

bull No bright line rulebull Factors in favor of acute work-up

ndash stroke risk factors (including age gt50) and acute onset vertigondash Headachendash Additional neurologic complaints (besides nv hearing loss

tinnitus)ndash focal finding on neuro exam

bull Factors in favor of foregoing MRIndash Unidirectional horizontal nystagmus that improves with fixationndash Unilateral hearing loss tinnitus without other neurologic signs ndash ABSENCE OF STROKE RISK FACTORS ndash Absence of focal findings on neuro exam

Approach 1 Forego MRI if

A patient has isolated acute vertigo peripheral vestibular nystagmus that is suppressed by visual fixation and is unstable but can still walk ok to defer MRI for 48 hours Substantial improvement in 48 hours is consistent with vestibular neuritis and brain imaging is not necessary Hotson et al NEJM 1998

Approach 2Obtain MRI if

1-acute or subacute onset of prolonged vertigo and postural imbalance and2-horizontal spontaneous nystagmus 3-AND one or more of the following

ndash Skew deviationndash Gaze evoked nystagmus (opposite to the direction of

spontaneous nystagmus)ndash Vertical saccadic pursuitndash Normal head thrust test ORndash Severe or multiple vascular risk factorsCnyrim et al J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2008

Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology

bull Cardio-embolic

bull Large vessel atherosclerosis

bull Vertebral artery dissection (especially in young patients)

bull Small vessel disease

bull Artery-artery embolismbull Hypercoaguable states vasculitis venous sinus thrombosis acute cocaine use

Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient

bull History

1-characterize the dizziness

2-onset of vertigo

3-duration of vertigo

4-accompanying symptoms

5-stroke risk factors

bull Exam

-Characterize nystagmus

-Gait

-Other neurologic findings

-add to your repertoire

-head thrust test

-vertical pursuit

-skew deviation

  • Evaluating the acutely dizzy patient
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Dizziness the problem
  • The dizzy patient history
  • Peripheral vs Central
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus
  • Vertigo exam nystagmus
  • What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic
  • Vertigo exam gait
  • Vertigo Exam other findings
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Neuro-imaging
  • So who needs an acute work-up
  • Approach 1 Forego MRI if
  • Approach 2Obtain MRI if
  • Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology
  • Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient
Page 20: Evaluating the acutely dizzy patientdepts.washington.edu/uwmedres/program/conferences/... · vestibular nystagmusthat is suppressed by visual fixation, and is unstable but can still

Vertigo Exam other findings

bull Cranial nervesndash 2 funduscopic exam disc edema

pupils Hornerrsquosndash 3 Skew deviation (vertical misalignment) extraocular movements

cover-uncoverVertical smooth pursuit saccadic interruptions

ndash 5 impaired pain and temperature (ipsilateral)ndash 7 face weaknessndash 3 6 8 Head thrust test nystagmus ndash 9 10 hoarseness unilateral decreased palate elevation unilateral loss

of gagbull Motor unilateral weaknessbull Sensory impaired pain and temperature classically contralateral to

facebull Coordination impaired finger-nose-finger HKS inability to walk

Pract Neurol201010129-139 doi101136jnnp2010211607 ReviewChronic dizziness a practical approach Bronstein AM et al

+

Exam finding Central lesion Vestibularneuritis

Groupdifference

Vertical saccadicpursuit

88 20 p lt 01

Gaze evokednystagmus

56 17 p lt 01

Skew deviation

40 0 p lt 01

Positive head thrust sign

39 82 plt 01

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008 Apr79(4)458-60Bedside differentiation of vestibular neuritis from central vestibular pseudoneuritis

Cnyrim CD Newman-Toker D Karch C Brandt T Strupp M

Neuro-imaging

bull Head CT will rule out hemorrhagendash Negative head CT does not rule out acute ischemic

stroke

bull Brain MRI is the best study

So who needs an acute work-up

bull No bright line rulebull Factors in favor of acute work-up

ndash stroke risk factors (including age gt50) and acute onset vertigondash Headachendash Additional neurologic complaints (besides nv hearing loss

tinnitus)ndash focal finding on neuro exam

bull Factors in favor of foregoing MRIndash Unidirectional horizontal nystagmus that improves with fixationndash Unilateral hearing loss tinnitus without other neurologic signs ndash ABSENCE OF STROKE RISK FACTORS ndash Absence of focal findings on neuro exam

Approach 1 Forego MRI if

A patient has isolated acute vertigo peripheral vestibular nystagmus that is suppressed by visual fixation and is unstable but can still walk ok to defer MRI for 48 hours Substantial improvement in 48 hours is consistent with vestibular neuritis and brain imaging is not necessary Hotson et al NEJM 1998

Approach 2Obtain MRI if

1-acute or subacute onset of prolonged vertigo and postural imbalance and2-horizontal spontaneous nystagmus 3-AND one or more of the following

ndash Skew deviationndash Gaze evoked nystagmus (opposite to the direction of

spontaneous nystagmus)ndash Vertical saccadic pursuitndash Normal head thrust test ORndash Severe or multiple vascular risk factorsCnyrim et al J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2008

Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology

bull Cardio-embolic

bull Large vessel atherosclerosis

bull Vertebral artery dissection (especially in young patients)

bull Small vessel disease

bull Artery-artery embolismbull Hypercoaguable states vasculitis venous sinus thrombosis acute cocaine use

Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient

bull History

1-characterize the dizziness

2-onset of vertigo

3-duration of vertigo

4-accompanying symptoms

5-stroke risk factors

bull Exam

-Characterize nystagmus

-Gait

-Other neurologic findings

-add to your repertoire

-head thrust test

-vertical pursuit

-skew deviation

  • Evaluating the acutely dizzy patient
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Dizziness the problem
  • The dizzy patient history
  • Peripheral vs Central
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus
  • Vertigo exam nystagmus
  • What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic
  • Vertigo exam gait
  • Vertigo Exam other findings
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Neuro-imaging
  • So who needs an acute work-up
  • Approach 1 Forego MRI if
  • Approach 2Obtain MRI if
  • Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology
  • Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient
Page 21: Evaluating the acutely dizzy patientdepts.washington.edu/uwmedres/program/conferences/... · vestibular nystagmusthat is suppressed by visual fixation, and is unstable but can still

Pract Neurol201010129-139 doi101136jnnp2010211607 ReviewChronic dizziness a practical approach Bronstein AM et al

+

Exam finding Central lesion Vestibularneuritis

Groupdifference

Vertical saccadicpursuit

88 20 p lt 01

Gaze evokednystagmus

56 17 p lt 01

Skew deviation

40 0 p lt 01

Positive head thrust sign

39 82 plt 01

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008 Apr79(4)458-60Bedside differentiation of vestibular neuritis from central vestibular pseudoneuritis

Cnyrim CD Newman-Toker D Karch C Brandt T Strupp M

Neuro-imaging

bull Head CT will rule out hemorrhagendash Negative head CT does not rule out acute ischemic

stroke

bull Brain MRI is the best study

So who needs an acute work-up

bull No bright line rulebull Factors in favor of acute work-up

ndash stroke risk factors (including age gt50) and acute onset vertigondash Headachendash Additional neurologic complaints (besides nv hearing loss

tinnitus)ndash focal finding on neuro exam

bull Factors in favor of foregoing MRIndash Unidirectional horizontal nystagmus that improves with fixationndash Unilateral hearing loss tinnitus without other neurologic signs ndash ABSENCE OF STROKE RISK FACTORS ndash Absence of focal findings on neuro exam

Approach 1 Forego MRI if

A patient has isolated acute vertigo peripheral vestibular nystagmus that is suppressed by visual fixation and is unstable but can still walk ok to defer MRI for 48 hours Substantial improvement in 48 hours is consistent with vestibular neuritis and brain imaging is not necessary Hotson et al NEJM 1998

Approach 2Obtain MRI if

1-acute or subacute onset of prolonged vertigo and postural imbalance and2-horizontal spontaneous nystagmus 3-AND one or more of the following

ndash Skew deviationndash Gaze evoked nystagmus (opposite to the direction of

spontaneous nystagmus)ndash Vertical saccadic pursuitndash Normal head thrust test ORndash Severe or multiple vascular risk factorsCnyrim et al J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2008

Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology

bull Cardio-embolic

bull Large vessel atherosclerosis

bull Vertebral artery dissection (especially in young patients)

bull Small vessel disease

bull Artery-artery embolismbull Hypercoaguable states vasculitis venous sinus thrombosis acute cocaine use

Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient

bull History

1-characterize the dizziness

2-onset of vertigo

3-duration of vertigo

4-accompanying symptoms

5-stroke risk factors

bull Exam

-Characterize nystagmus

-Gait

-Other neurologic findings

-add to your repertoire

-head thrust test

-vertical pursuit

-skew deviation

  • Evaluating the acutely dizzy patient
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Dizziness the problem
  • The dizzy patient history
  • Peripheral vs Central
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus
  • Vertigo exam nystagmus
  • What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic
  • Vertigo exam gait
  • Vertigo Exam other findings
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Neuro-imaging
  • So who needs an acute work-up
  • Approach 1 Forego MRI if
  • Approach 2Obtain MRI if
  • Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology
  • Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient
Page 22: Evaluating the acutely dizzy patientdepts.washington.edu/uwmedres/program/conferences/... · vestibular nystagmusthat is suppressed by visual fixation, and is unstable but can still

Exam finding Central lesion Vestibularneuritis

Groupdifference

Vertical saccadicpursuit

88 20 p lt 01

Gaze evokednystagmus

56 17 p lt 01

Skew deviation

40 0 p lt 01

Positive head thrust sign

39 82 plt 01

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008 Apr79(4)458-60Bedside differentiation of vestibular neuritis from central vestibular pseudoneuritis

Cnyrim CD Newman-Toker D Karch C Brandt T Strupp M

Neuro-imaging

bull Head CT will rule out hemorrhagendash Negative head CT does not rule out acute ischemic

stroke

bull Brain MRI is the best study

So who needs an acute work-up

bull No bright line rulebull Factors in favor of acute work-up

ndash stroke risk factors (including age gt50) and acute onset vertigondash Headachendash Additional neurologic complaints (besides nv hearing loss

tinnitus)ndash focal finding on neuro exam

bull Factors in favor of foregoing MRIndash Unidirectional horizontal nystagmus that improves with fixationndash Unilateral hearing loss tinnitus without other neurologic signs ndash ABSENCE OF STROKE RISK FACTORS ndash Absence of focal findings on neuro exam

Approach 1 Forego MRI if

A patient has isolated acute vertigo peripheral vestibular nystagmus that is suppressed by visual fixation and is unstable but can still walk ok to defer MRI for 48 hours Substantial improvement in 48 hours is consistent with vestibular neuritis and brain imaging is not necessary Hotson et al NEJM 1998

Approach 2Obtain MRI if

1-acute or subacute onset of prolonged vertigo and postural imbalance and2-horizontal spontaneous nystagmus 3-AND one or more of the following

ndash Skew deviationndash Gaze evoked nystagmus (opposite to the direction of

spontaneous nystagmus)ndash Vertical saccadic pursuitndash Normal head thrust test ORndash Severe or multiple vascular risk factorsCnyrim et al J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2008

Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology

bull Cardio-embolic

bull Large vessel atherosclerosis

bull Vertebral artery dissection (especially in young patients)

bull Small vessel disease

bull Artery-artery embolismbull Hypercoaguable states vasculitis venous sinus thrombosis acute cocaine use

Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient

bull History

1-characterize the dizziness

2-onset of vertigo

3-duration of vertigo

4-accompanying symptoms

5-stroke risk factors

bull Exam

-Characterize nystagmus

-Gait

-Other neurologic findings

-add to your repertoire

-head thrust test

-vertical pursuit

-skew deviation

  • Evaluating the acutely dizzy patient
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Dizziness the problem
  • The dizzy patient history
  • Peripheral vs Central
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus
  • Vertigo exam nystagmus
  • What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic
  • Vertigo exam gait
  • Vertigo Exam other findings
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Neuro-imaging
  • So who needs an acute work-up
  • Approach 1 Forego MRI if
  • Approach 2Obtain MRI if
  • Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology
  • Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient
Page 23: Evaluating the acutely dizzy patientdepts.washington.edu/uwmedres/program/conferences/... · vestibular nystagmusthat is suppressed by visual fixation, and is unstable but can still

Neuro-imaging

bull Head CT will rule out hemorrhagendash Negative head CT does not rule out acute ischemic

stroke

bull Brain MRI is the best study

So who needs an acute work-up

bull No bright line rulebull Factors in favor of acute work-up

ndash stroke risk factors (including age gt50) and acute onset vertigondash Headachendash Additional neurologic complaints (besides nv hearing loss

tinnitus)ndash focal finding on neuro exam

bull Factors in favor of foregoing MRIndash Unidirectional horizontal nystagmus that improves with fixationndash Unilateral hearing loss tinnitus without other neurologic signs ndash ABSENCE OF STROKE RISK FACTORS ndash Absence of focal findings on neuro exam

Approach 1 Forego MRI if

A patient has isolated acute vertigo peripheral vestibular nystagmus that is suppressed by visual fixation and is unstable but can still walk ok to defer MRI for 48 hours Substantial improvement in 48 hours is consistent with vestibular neuritis and brain imaging is not necessary Hotson et al NEJM 1998

Approach 2Obtain MRI if

1-acute or subacute onset of prolonged vertigo and postural imbalance and2-horizontal spontaneous nystagmus 3-AND one or more of the following

ndash Skew deviationndash Gaze evoked nystagmus (opposite to the direction of

spontaneous nystagmus)ndash Vertical saccadic pursuitndash Normal head thrust test ORndash Severe or multiple vascular risk factorsCnyrim et al J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2008

Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology

bull Cardio-embolic

bull Large vessel atherosclerosis

bull Vertebral artery dissection (especially in young patients)

bull Small vessel disease

bull Artery-artery embolismbull Hypercoaguable states vasculitis venous sinus thrombosis acute cocaine use

Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient

bull History

1-characterize the dizziness

2-onset of vertigo

3-duration of vertigo

4-accompanying symptoms

5-stroke risk factors

bull Exam

-Characterize nystagmus

-Gait

-Other neurologic findings

-add to your repertoire

-head thrust test

-vertical pursuit

-skew deviation

  • Evaluating the acutely dizzy patient
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Dizziness the problem
  • The dizzy patient history
  • Peripheral vs Central
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus
  • Vertigo exam nystagmus
  • What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic
  • Vertigo exam gait
  • Vertigo Exam other findings
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Neuro-imaging
  • So who needs an acute work-up
  • Approach 1 Forego MRI if
  • Approach 2Obtain MRI if
  • Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology
  • Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient
Page 24: Evaluating the acutely dizzy patientdepts.washington.edu/uwmedres/program/conferences/... · vestibular nystagmusthat is suppressed by visual fixation, and is unstable but can still

So who needs an acute work-up

bull No bright line rulebull Factors in favor of acute work-up

ndash stroke risk factors (including age gt50) and acute onset vertigondash Headachendash Additional neurologic complaints (besides nv hearing loss

tinnitus)ndash focal finding on neuro exam

bull Factors in favor of foregoing MRIndash Unidirectional horizontal nystagmus that improves with fixationndash Unilateral hearing loss tinnitus without other neurologic signs ndash ABSENCE OF STROKE RISK FACTORS ndash Absence of focal findings on neuro exam

Approach 1 Forego MRI if

A patient has isolated acute vertigo peripheral vestibular nystagmus that is suppressed by visual fixation and is unstable but can still walk ok to defer MRI for 48 hours Substantial improvement in 48 hours is consistent with vestibular neuritis and brain imaging is not necessary Hotson et al NEJM 1998

Approach 2Obtain MRI if

1-acute or subacute onset of prolonged vertigo and postural imbalance and2-horizontal spontaneous nystagmus 3-AND one or more of the following

ndash Skew deviationndash Gaze evoked nystagmus (opposite to the direction of

spontaneous nystagmus)ndash Vertical saccadic pursuitndash Normal head thrust test ORndash Severe or multiple vascular risk factorsCnyrim et al J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2008

Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology

bull Cardio-embolic

bull Large vessel atherosclerosis

bull Vertebral artery dissection (especially in young patients)

bull Small vessel disease

bull Artery-artery embolismbull Hypercoaguable states vasculitis venous sinus thrombosis acute cocaine use

Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient

bull History

1-characterize the dizziness

2-onset of vertigo

3-duration of vertigo

4-accompanying symptoms

5-stroke risk factors

bull Exam

-Characterize nystagmus

-Gait

-Other neurologic findings

-add to your repertoire

-head thrust test

-vertical pursuit

-skew deviation

  • Evaluating the acutely dizzy patient
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Dizziness the problem
  • The dizzy patient history
  • Peripheral vs Central
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus
  • Vertigo exam nystagmus
  • What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic
  • Vertigo exam gait
  • Vertigo Exam other findings
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Neuro-imaging
  • So who needs an acute work-up
  • Approach 1 Forego MRI if
  • Approach 2Obtain MRI if
  • Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology
  • Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient
Page 25: Evaluating the acutely dizzy patientdepts.washington.edu/uwmedres/program/conferences/... · vestibular nystagmusthat is suppressed by visual fixation, and is unstable but can still

Approach 1 Forego MRI if

A patient has isolated acute vertigo peripheral vestibular nystagmus that is suppressed by visual fixation and is unstable but can still walk ok to defer MRI for 48 hours Substantial improvement in 48 hours is consistent with vestibular neuritis and brain imaging is not necessary Hotson et al NEJM 1998

Approach 2Obtain MRI if

1-acute or subacute onset of prolonged vertigo and postural imbalance and2-horizontal spontaneous nystagmus 3-AND one or more of the following

ndash Skew deviationndash Gaze evoked nystagmus (opposite to the direction of

spontaneous nystagmus)ndash Vertical saccadic pursuitndash Normal head thrust test ORndash Severe or multiple vascular risk factorsCnyrim et al J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2008

Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology

bull Cardio-embolic

bull Large vessel atherosclerosis

bull Vertebral artery dissection (especially in young patients)

bull Small vessel disease

bull Artery-artery embolismbull Hypercoaguable states vasculitis venous sinus thrombosis acute cocaine use

Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient

bull History

1-characterize the dizziness

2-onset of vertigo

3-duration of vertigo

4-accompanying symptoms

5-stroke risk factors

bull Exam

-Characterize nystagmus

-Gait

-Other neurologic findings

-add to your repertoire

-head thrust test

-vertical pursuit

-skew deviation

  • Evaluating the acutely dizzy patient
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Dizziness the problem
  • The dizzy patient history
  • Peripheral vs Central
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus
  • Vertigo exam nystagmus
  • What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic
  • Vertigo exam gait
  • Vertigo Exam other findings
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Neuro-imaging
  • So who needs an acute work-up
  • Approach 1 Forego MRI if
  • Approach 2Obtain MRI if
  • Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology
  • Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient
Page 26: Evaluating the acutely dizzy patientdepts.washington.edu/uwmedres/program/conferences/... · vestibular nystagmusthat is suppressed by visual fixation, and is unstable but can still

Approach 2Obtain MRI if

1-acute or subacute onset of prolonged vertigo and postural imbalance and2-horizontal spontaneous nystagmus 3-AND one or more of the following

ndash Skew deviationndash Gaze evoked nystagmus (opposite to the direction of

spontaneous nystagmus)ndash Vertical saccadic pursuitndash Normal head thrust test ORndash Severe or multiple vascular risk factorsCnyrim et al J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2008

Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology

bull Cardio-embolic

bull Large vessel atherosclerosis

bull Vertebral artery dissection (especially in young patients)

bull Small vessel disease

bull Artery-artery embolismbull Hypercoaguable states vasculitis venous sinus thrombosis acute cocaine use

Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient

bull History

1-characterize the dizziness

2-onset of vertigo

3-duration of vertigo

4-accompanying symptoms

5-stroke risk factors

bull Exam

-Characterize nystagmus

-Gait

-Other neurologic findings

-add to your repertoire

-head thrust test

-vertical pursuit

-skew deviation

  • Evaluating the acutely dizzy patient
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Dizziness the problem
  • The dizzy patient history
  • Peripheral vs Central
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus
  • Vertigo exam nystagmus
  • What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic
  • Vertigo exam gait
  • Vertigo Exam other findings
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Neuro-imaging
  • So who needs an acute work-up
  • Approach 1 Forego MRI if
  • Approach 2Obtain MRI if
  • Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology
  • Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient
Page 27: Evaluating the acutely dizzy patientdepts.washington.edu/uwmedres/program/conferences/... · vestibular nystagmusthat is suppressed by visual fixation, and is unstable but can still

Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology

bull Cardio-embolic

bull Large vessel atherosclerosis

bull Vertebral artery dissection (especially in young patients)

bull Small vessel disease

bull Artery-artery embolismbull Hypercoaguable states vasculitis venous sinus thrombosis acute cocaine use

Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient

bull History

1-characterize the dizziness

2-onset of vertigo

3-duration of vertigo

4-accompanying symptoms

5-stroke risk factors

bull Exam

-Characterize nystagmus

-Gait

-Other neurologic findings

-add to your repertoire

-head thrust test

-vertical pursuit

-skew deviation

  • Evaluating the acutely dizzy patient
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Dizziness the problem
  • The dizzy patient history
  • Peripheral vs Central
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus
  • Vertigo exam nystagmus
  • What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic
  • Vertigo exam gait
  • Vertigo Exam other findings
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Neuro-imaging
  • So who needs an acute work-up
  • Approach 1 Forego MRI if
  • Approach 2Obtain MRI if
  • Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology
  • Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient
Page 28: Evaluating the acutely dizzy patientdepts.washington.edu/uwmedres/program/conferences/... · vestibular nystagmusthat is suppressed by visual fixation, and is unstable but can still

Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient

bull History

1-characterize the dizziness

2-onset of vertigo

3-duration of vertigo

4-accompanying symptoms

5-stroke risk factors

bull Exam

-Characterize nystagmus

-Gait

-Other neurologic findings

-add to your repertoire

-head thrust test

-vertical pursuit

-skew deviation

  • Evaluating the acutely dizzy patient
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Dizziness the problem
  • The dizzy patient history
  • Peripheral vs Central
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • History patient with vertigo
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Vertigo exam characterize the nystagmus
  • Vertigo exam nystagmus
  • What if the patient doesnrsquot have nystagmus in clinic
  • Vertigo exam gait
  • Vertigo Exam other findings
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Neuro-imaging
  • So who needs an acute work-up
  • Approach 1 Forego MRI if
  • Approach 2Obtain MRI if
  • Additional work-up to discern stroke etiology
  • Summary Evaluating a dizzy patient