evaluating your own teaching by dr[1]. shadia yousef banjar.pptx
TRANSCRIPT
LANE 462
By:By:By:By:
Dr. Dr. Dr. Dr. ShadiaShadiaShadiaShadia YousefYousefYousefYousef BanjarBanjarBanjarBanjar
http://SBANJAR.kau.edu.sa/
http://wwwdrshadiabanjar.blogspot.com
Evaluating Your Own Teaching
7/25/2010 1Dr. Shadia Yousef Banjar
•Doing good evaluation is like doing good research.
In both cases, you are trying to answer some
important questions about an important topic.
•The key to doing both activities well is:
(a) identifying the right questions to ask and
(b) figuring out how to answer them.
A Definition of "Evaluation"
7/25/2010 Dr. Shadia Yousef Banjar 2
(b) figuring out how to answer them.
Basically they are:
1. "How well am I teaching?
2. Which aspects of my teaching are good and
which need to be improved?“
WHAT ARE THE KEY QUESTIONS IN THE
EVALUATION OF TEACHING?
7/25/2010 Dr. Shadia Yousef Banjar 3
which need to be improved?“
The first question attempts to provide a global
assessment, while the second is analytical and
diagnostic in character.
•Teachers should evaluate their teaching for two
reasons:
•to document the quality of one’s teaching to
others in a portfolio.
•to perform a better job and to have a more
Why Evaluate?
7/25/2010 Dr. Shadia Yousef Banjar 4
•to perform a better job and to have a more
enjoyable experience.
THE EFFECT OF EVALUATION ON OUR TEACHING
7/25/2010 Dr. Shadia Yousef Banjar 5
How to Evaluate?
There are five basic sources of
information that teachers can use to
evaluate their teaching. All evaluation
efforts use one or more of these basic
sources. Each of these five sources has a
7/25/2010 Dr. Shadia Yousef Banjar 6
sources. Each of these five sources has a
unique value as well as an inherent
limitation.
These five sources of information are :1. self-monitoring ,2. audio -tape/video -tape ,3. information from students ,4. students’ test results , and 5. outside observers .
7/25/2010 Dr. Shadia Yousef Banjar 7
TechniquesUnique Value and
Recommended
Frequency
LimitationsAppropriate Response to
Limitations
1. Self-monitoring
2. Audio-tape/video-tape
3. Information from students
a. Questionnaires
(1) Beginning of year
Each of The Each of The Each of The Each of The
fivefivefivefive sources of sources of sources of sources of
information information information information
has its unique has its unique has its unique has its unique
value, value, value, value,
7/25/2010 Dr. Shadia Yousef Banjar 8
(1) Beginning of year
(2) Mid-year
(3) End-of-year
b. Interviews
4. Students' test results
5. Outside observers
a. Fellow faculty member
b. Admin./Senior Fac.
Member
c. OU Instruc. Devel. Prog.
value, value, value, value,
recommended recommended recommended recommended
frequency, frequency, frequency, frequency,
limitation, and limitation, and limitation, and limitation, and
appropriate appropriate appropriate appropriate
response to response to response to response to
that limitation. that limitation. that limitation. that limitation.
Self-monitoring
Self-monitoring is what people do semi-automatically
and semi-consciously whenever they teach. Most of
their mental activity is concerned with making the
presentation or leading the discussion. But one portion
of their mental attention is concerned with:
a. "How is it going?“
7/25/2010 Dr. Shadia Yousef Banjar 9
a. "How is it going?“
b. "Are they with me?"
c. "Am I losing them?“
d. "Are they interested or bored?"
• Unique Valuea. The first value is immediate and constant attention concerned
with “How is it going?”, “Are they with me”, “Are they interested or bored”, etc.
b. A second value is created by the teacher by looking at the situation and say “This is what is happening”
• FrequencyThis does and should happen all the time. We may only take a mental pause every few minutes to size up the situation. But by comparison with the other sources of information this takes
Self-monitoring
7/25/2010 Dr. Shadia Yousef Banjar 10
comparison with the other sources of information this takes place continuously.
• LimitationPersonal judgment may lack complete objectivity• Appropriate ResponseTo turn to an objective source of information without subjective bias.
•Special value
Putting a video or audio recorder gives the teacher a totally objective
information: what she said, how much time she spent in a topic, and
how often she moved around.
•Frequency. an audio recording is preferably twice in each semester course. This gives a chance to see if any speech problems are there,
the second recording is to check if they are under control. Video
Audio -tape/video -tape
7/25/2010 Dr. Shadia Yousef Banjar 11
the second recording is to check if they are under control. Video
recordings are probably useful once every year or two.
•Limitation
Despite that the audio/video tape shows the actual behavior, it does not
show the effect of that behavior on students
•Appropriate Response
To get a source of information that shows the effect of behavior (i.e. the
students themselves)
•Special value:The student is the best person to judge whether the teaching is exciting or dull. The teacher can get the student opinion through two ways: questionnaires & interviewsa. questionnaires include students characteristics (e.g. major, GPA, reasons for taking the course), students characteristics of the teaching (e.g. clear, organized, interesting), amount learned, overall assessment of the course and/or the teacher.Special value is in obtaining responses of the whole classThe limitation is that they can only ask a question once.b. interviews either by the teacher or an outside person Special value is in identifying unanticipated strengths & weaknesses, probing and
Information from students
7/25/2010 Dr. Shadia Yousef Banjar 12
Special value is in identifying unanticipated strengths & weaknesses, probing and following-up on topics that need clarification.The limitation is that they can be used only with a sub-set of the class, not the whole class.•General limitationsis that students may have negative feelings about women, for example, or people who are ethically different from themselves. Also, the students can address what is taught but not what might be taught•Appropriate ResponseTo seek for the information from someone with a professional understanding of the possibilities of good teaching.
•Special value
Tests results assess the quality of student learning and, accordingly, assess
the quality of teaching.
•Frequency. Weekly or even daily feedback is much more effective to know whether students are learning what they need to learn as the course goes
along considering that not all tests need to be graded and recorded!
•Limitation
The students may have low or good grade, but not because the teacher was
Students’ test results
7/25/2010 Dr. Shadia Yousef Banjar 13
The students may have low or good grade, but not because the teacher was
bad or good.
•Appropriate response
Students themselves have to answer the question of whether the teacher was
helpful.
•Special value
The outsider has no personal issue, so s/he is free to reach positive and
negative conclusions . Also, being professional, s/he can bring the
expertise that supplements both the teacher and the students.
•Limitation
The outside observer can only visit one or two class sessions, and not the
rest of the course.
Outside observers
7/25/2010 Dr. Shadia Yousef Banjar 14
rest of the course.
•Appropriate response
To use a different source either a different kind of outside observer or one
of the other sources.
Each source of information offers a special
kind of information that none of the others
do. Thus, it is recommended to refer to all
of the five sources.
Conclusion
7/25/2010 Dr. Shadia Yousef Banjar 15
of the five sources.
EVALUATING YOUR OWN TEACHING
By L. Dee Fink
Published in Improving College Teaching by Peter Seldin (ed.).
Reprinted here with permission of the University of Oklahoma Instructional
Development Program, July 20, 1999.
http://honolulu.hawaii.edu/intranet/committees/FacDevCom/guidebk/teachtip/evalu
ate.htm
7/25/2010 16Dr. Shadia Yousef Banjar