evaluation criteria reporting metricsidahotc.com/portals/0/webinar documents/school...**2009-2010 sy...
TRANSCRIPT
6/2/2011
1
EVALUATIONCRITERIA & REPORTINGMETRICS
School Improvement Grant Monitoring
LEA Review Process
THE SIG MONITORING/REVIEW PROCESS
Data MetricsPhone & In
Person
Instructional Focus Visit
Cash Balance Annual Goals
WISE Transformation
Plan
Interviews
Cash Balance Report
District Guiding
Questions
& Expectations
6/2/2011
2
MONITORING SIGSDE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Instructional Focus Visits
•Classroom Observations•Teacher Interviews•Admin Interviews
Implementation Process
Phone & In-person Interviews
•Quarterly•WISE updates
•Quarterly•Key District/School Leaders•District Guiding Questions
Cash Balance Reports •Quarterly
TIMELINE OF EVALUATION CRITERIA
Month Activity
Aug •Previous Year Final Report•District Guiding Q ti
Month Activity
Feb •CEE Survey
March •Phone InterviewQuestions
Sept •Initial On-site Interview•Revised Annual Goals & Expectations
Oct •Cash Balance Report•Phone Interview
Nov •WISE Updates
March Phone Interview
April •Cash Balance Report•WISE Updates
May •Conclusion On-Site Interview•Classroom Observation Data
June •Metric Data CollectionDec •Mid-year On-site
Interview•Classroom Observation Data
Jan •Cash Balance Report•WISE Updates
July •Cash Balance Report•WISE Updates•Metric Data Collection•SDE Review of SIG
6/2/2011
3
Evidence of Success or
IDAHO TRANSFORMATION MODELDISTRICT GUIDING QUESTIONS
WISE Transformation Toolkit
Implementation of Processes and Activities (Timeline)
Success or Implementation
Toolkit
Leaders & Teachers
Instructional & Support Strategies
Learning Time & Support
School Governance
DISTRICT GUIDING QUESTIONS
Teachers and Leaders
Instructional and Support and Leaders pp
Strategies
Learning Ti d GTime and Support
Governance
13 QUESTIONS TO ASSIST WITH MONITORING & TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
6/2/2011
4
CEE Survey Data
•Baseline Comparison•Relationship to
Intervention Model
Student Achievement Data•(1st, 5th and 9th months)•Spring ISAT•IRI (if applicable)
Classroom Observation Data•Walkthrough information•Process of
implementation( pp )•PMA (if applicable)•Formative (interim)
Assessment
•Schedule
PROCESS OF REVIEWING ANNUAL GOALS
REPORTING METRICS PURPOSE:
To inform and evaluate the effectiveness of the selected interventions
DATA SOURCES DATA SOURCES: EDFacts (www.ed.gov) State Fiscal Stabilization Funds (SFSF) District
INDICATORS: Achievement Leading Indicators Leading Indicators
DATA CATAGORIES: School Student Outcome/Academic Progress s Student Connection & School Climate Talent
6/2/2011
5
REPORTING METRICS SCHOOL DATA
• Intervention ModelAYP St t• AYP Status
• AYP Targets Met & Missed• School Improvement Status• # of minutes per school year
SDE Responsibility
•# of minutes per school year for reading instruction•# of minutes per school year for math instruction
LEA/School Responsibility
REPORTING METRICS STUDENT OUTCOMES/ACADEMIC PROGRESS
• % at or above proficiency on ISAT in RD/LU/MT
• % participation on ISAT in RD/LU/MT
• Average Scale Score• % ELL proficient on AMAO• Graduation Rate• Dropout Rate• Student Attendance Rate• # & % completing AP/IB
k
SDE Responsibility
coursework
LEA/School Responsibility
6/2/2011
6
REPORTING METRICS STUDENT CONNECTIONS & SCHOOLCLIMATE
• Discipline IncidentsT t• TruantsSDE
Collection
LEA/School Collection
REPORTING METRICS TALENT
• Distribution of teachers by performance level on LEA’s performance level on LEA s teacher evaluation
• Teacher attendance rateSDE
Responsibility
LEA/School Responsibility
6/2/2011
7
Annual Goals
Student Outcomes
DETERMINATION TO RENEW AN LEA’SSIG IF NOT MEETING ANNUAL GOALS
Individual SIG School State
Goals Outcomes
All Student Category and for each sub-group
Individual SIG School
Other SIG Schools
DETERMINATION TO RENEW AN LEA’SSIG IF NOT MEETING ANNUAL GOALS
ACTIONS EVIDENCE IMPLEMENTATIONACTIONS
• School’s ability to show improvement
• District’s ability to build capacity in school and district
EVIDENCE
• School’s fidelity to selected intervention model
• Progress of School’s leading indicators
IMPLEMENTATION
• Timeline of implementation
• Effectiveness of implementation
• Sustainability of implementation
SDE will provide district with written summary of its findings.
6/2/2011
8
DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIESBASELINE DATA (SY 2009-2010)DUE AUGUST 1ST, 2011
Distribution of teachers by performance level on LEA’s Teacher Evaluation
(District and School)
Teacher Attendance Rate
(District and School)
Reading Instructional Minutes (School)g ( )
**2009-2010 SY and 2010-2011 SY**
Math Instructional Minutes (School)
**2009-2010 SY and 2010-2011 SY**
REPORTING METRICSBASELINE DATADUE AUGUST 1ST, 2011
District Guiding QuestionsDistrict Guiding Questions
Revised Budget for 2011-2012
WISE Transformation Tool Updated
Baseline District and School Data
Send to Jodie Mills: [email protected]
6/2/2011
9
OTHER THINGS!
Letter of Support for REL (Steve)
GRA request for reimbursement (Steve)
Email 1st day of School (Lisa)
Go Fly Fishing (Jodie) Go Fly Fishing (Jodie)
QUESTIONS?
Steve Underwood - Director sunderwood@sde idaho gov [email protected] 208-332-6922
Jodie Mills - Coordinator [email protected] 308-332-6869
Lisa Paul – Administrative Assistant [email protected] 208-332-6942