evaluation form sanitation
DESCRIPTION
a tool assessing the environmental sanitationTRANSCRIPT
RESEARCH PROPOSAL EVALUATION
(Evaluators Copy)Instruction: Evaluate the proposal by putting a check sign () in the box of your choice.
LEGEND: 1: Not at all; 2: To a certain extent; 3: To a full extent
Indicators 123
1. The proposed title is a good one, suggesting the research problem and the study population./
2. The problem is stated clearly and is easy to identify./
3. The problem statement makes clear the concepts and the population under study./
4. The problem has significance to the institution/NHERA-2./
5. There is a good match between the research problem and the paradigm and methods to be used. /
6. The literature review is thorough, up-to-date, and based mainly on primary sources./
7. The review summarizes knowledge on the variables and the relationship between them./
8. The literature review lays a solid basis for the new study. /
9. The key concepts are adequately defined. If not, the absence is justified./
10. Research questions and/or hypotheses are explicitly stated, appropriately worded, and consistent with the literature review and the conceptual framework. If not, their absence is justified./
11. The most rigorous design will be used, given the study purpose./
12. The design will minimize threats to the internal and external validity of the study./
13. The population is identified and described./
14. The sample is described in sufficient detail./
15. The best possible sampling design will be used to enhance the samples representativeness./
16. The power analysis will be used to estimate sample size needs./
17. The specific instruments are adequately described and are good choices. /
18. The instruments are valid and reliable./
19. The statistical treatment is relevant and adequately presented and explained./
20. The APA Sixth edition was accurately used in writing the proposal./
21. The paper is well-structured, organized with few grammatical and syntactical errors. /
TOTAL
Total Mean
Interpretation: 1-2: Needs major revision before approval2.1-3 : Needs minor revision for approval Instruction: Write your qualitative evaluation of the proposal by highlighting the strengths and your recommendations for the proposals improvement. Please use separate sheet if you need one.
Proposal/Paper StrengthSuggestions/Recommendations for Improvement
1.Title of Research
2.Introduction
3.Review of Literature and Studies
4.Theoretical/Conceptual Framework
5.Statement of the Problem
6. Method
7.Tool/Instrument
8.References
( ) Highly recommended for approval
( ) - Recommended for approval
( ) - Not recommended for approval unless revised Evaluators Name/ Signature:_____________________________________________________
Date:________________________________________RDO-RPEc