evaluation of csci experts by experience project
TRANSCRIPT
Evaluation of CSCI Experts by Experience
Project
Evaluation Methodology
• Accompanying inspectors• Visits to the area projects• Participant observation at regional meetings
and individual meetings• Telephone interviews • Questionnaires• Discussions with Service User Consultants• Development of interactive website
Service Users Reference Group
• Experts in older people, disability, sensory impairment, mental health and black and minority ethnic groups
• Met at beginning of project to consider the evaluation framework and regular meetings since
• Valuable discussion of website and complex issues such as inspecting home care
• One service user has taken over the evaluation of a project
• Will review final report
Projects in London and East Midlands
• Both of these different from the other seven:
• London: conference on elder abuse with commitment to further action
• East Midlands: a capacity building exercise for black and minority ethnic groups
• Much work to be done on both of these issues
South East RegionUse of Comment Cards in Residential Homes
• Feedback from care home managers
• Feedback from CSCI Inspectors
• Recruitment issues – training implications
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Comment Card returns - comparison
Return last year
Returns this year
South WestCreating a tool kit for people with severe
communication difficulties
• The effect of working closely with Bristol and South Gloucester People First (BSGP) has educated everyone
• Development of toolkit to improve communication between residents in homes and inspectors
• Has educated both sides
West MidlandsInvolving service users in inspections of
learning disability care homes
• Sandwell People First have developed a ‘job description’ for a ‘good inspector’
• A route for reporting from Sandwell People First was developed at the beginning
• Visited 41 homes with a support worker
Yorkshire and HumbersideInvolving service users in the Framework
for Social Services Departments
• Service users found participating very rewarding
• Significant number had never been involved in anything before
• Many felt that their involvement would create changes/potential problems of not being able to meet expectations
North West RegionInvolving service users and carers in the inspection of
domiciliary care
• Time constraints and involving service users
• Revision of domiciliary care questionnaire
• Agencies need to make clear that – complaints are taken seriously– services will not be withdrawn
The Final ReportEvaluation framework
• Methodology and tools
• Organisational and cultural issues
• Training implications
• Assessment of how well the programme met its aims
• Outcomes