evaluation of drilling rig selection

39
Evaluation of Drilling Rig Performance Characteristics Quinton T. Foulston, P.Eng. Precision Drilling CADE/CAODC 2009 Annual Drilling Conference 1

Upload: amithakim

Post on 24-Jul-2015

168 views

Category:

Documents


8 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

Evaluation of Drilling Rig Performance Characteristics

Quinton T. Foulston, P.Eng. Precision Drilling

CADE/CAODC 2009 Annual Drilling Conference

1

Page 2: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

2

1. Explore some of the ambiguities around the traditional RIG DEPTH RATING

2. Describe four (4) ALTERNATE drilling rig performance CHARACTERISTICS

3. Conclude with a brief summary

I will:

Page 3: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

3

Metrics commonly referred to when selecting a drilling rig in the US & International markets:

Drawworks horsepowerMast size & hookloadRig depth rating (often based on max depth of depth range assigned by drawworks OEM)

Page 4: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

4

Metrics commonly referred to when selecting a drilling rig in the US & International markets:

Drawworks horsepowerMast size & hookloadRig depth rating (often based on max depth of depth range assigned by drawworks OEM)

Rig depth ratingMast size & hookload

Metrics commonly referred to when selecting a drilling rig in the Canadian market:

Page 5: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

well profile

mud weight

drillstring design

casing design

condition of the hole

In order to assign a RIG DEPTH RATING, a Drilling Contractor must make AMBIGUOUS assumptions about the following:

5

Page 6: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

What can the rig PULL?

1. when stuck, or when running casing?

2. when POOH near TD?

How much pipe can the rig RACK?

3. based on the geometry of the selected pipe?

4. based on the weight of the selected pipe?

6

Four (4) ALTERNATE metrics:

Page 7: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

What can the rig PULL?

1. when stuck, or when running casing?

2. when POOH near TD?

How much pipe can the rig RACK?

3. based on geometry?

4. based on weight?

7

Four (4) ALTERNATE metrics:

Page 8: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

What the drilling rig*can PULL is determinedby comparing:

• Mast

• Drilling line

• Drawworks

8

Page 9: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

Considerationof the MAST when 

determining what the rig can PULL

9

Page 10: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

Typical MAST placard as per 3rd Edition of API 4F showing the maximum static hookload capacities

10

Page 11: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

Consideration of the WIRE ROPEwhen determining

what the rig can PULL 

11

Page 12: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

Rotary drilling line 3Rotary drilling line when setting casing 2Pulling on stuck pipe 2

Minimum WIRE ROPE design factors (select values taken from API RP9B 12th Edition):

Typical 6X19 IWRCdrill line construction

12

Page 13: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

Consideration of the DRAWWORKS when determining  what the rig can PULL 

13

Page 14: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

Example of DRAWWORKS placard maximum hookload capacities

14

Page 15: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

Consider the ACTUAL DRAWWORKS PRIME MOVER when determining 

what the rig can PULL

15

Page 16: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

16

Q1:What can the rig PULL when stuck, or running casing?

Page 17: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

Stuck pipe or casing running operations typically require the HIGHEST HOOKLOADS of the planned well

17

Page 18: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

Mast static hookload

HL using 2:1 SF on fastline breaking strength

drawworks OEM max HL or max SLP/HL calc from actual input torque

1. What the rig can PULL when stuck or running casing, is the lesser of:

18

Page 19: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

Q2: What can the rig PULL when tripping?At what speed?  With what overpull?

19

Page 20: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

Tripping operations typically require the HIGHEST HOISTING SPEEDS.

The HORSEPOWER of the drawworks prime mover defines the relationship between 

hookload and hoisting speed.20

Page 21: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

21

Wire Rope 33% (SF=2:1) 66% (SF=3:1)______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

When overpull requirements are specified:

Mast specified OP (100% less OP)

Drawworks specified OP (100% less OP)______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Overpull Reduced ‘Drilling’ Capacity

* Percentages (%) of maximum capacities in Q1:

Singles 15% 85%

Doubles 20% 80%

Triples 25% (up to 100kip) 75%

When overpull requirements are NOT specified, the Drilling  Contractor can make reductions to the mast & drawworks capacities based on the size of the drilling rig:

Page 22: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

22

Wire Rope 33% (SF=2:1) 66% (SF=3:1)______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

When overpull requirements are specified:

Mast specified OP (100% less OP)

Drawworks specified OP (100% less OP)______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Overpull Reduced ‘Drilling’ Capacity

* Percentages (%) of maximum capacities in Q1:

Singles 15% 85%

Doubles 20% 80%

Triples 25% (up to 100kip) 75%

When overpull requirements are NOT specified, the Drilling  Contractor can make reductions to the mast & drawworks capacities based on the size of the drilling rig:

Page 23: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

23

Wire Rope 33% (SF=2:1) 66% (SF=3:1)______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

When overpull requirements are specified:

Mast specified OP (100% less OP)

Drawworks specified OP (100% less OP)______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Overpull Reduced ‘Drilling’ Capacity

* Percentages (%) of maximum capacities in Q1:

Singles 15% 85%

Doubles 20% 80%

Triples 25% (up to 100kip) 75%

When overpull requirements are NOT specified, the Drilling  Contractor could make reductions to the mast & drawworks capacities, for drilling, based on the size of the rig:

Page 24: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

Mast static hookload

HL using 2:1 SF on fastline breaking strength

drawworks OEM max HL or max SLP/HL calc from actual input torque

1. What the rig can PULL when stuck or running casing, is the lesser of:

24

Mast static hookload less an overpull

HL using 3:1 SF on fastline breaking strength

calc HL from actual drwks HP & desired block speed, or drawworks max HL less an overpull

2. What the rig can POOH near TD at a desired block speed w/an overpull contingency, is the lesser of:

Page 25: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

How much pipecan the rig RACK?

25

Page 26: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

‘RACKING CAPACITY – number of stands that can be stood on the floor based on the geometryof the monkeyboard and racking floor

‘SETBACK CAPACITY – maximum uniform weightof tubulars that can be supported by the racking floor

Clarification of term definitions – as they relate to this presentation:

26

Page 27: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

What can the rig PULL?

1. when stuck, or when running casing?

2. when POOH near TD?

How much pipe can the rig RACK?

3. based on geometry?

4. based on weight?

27

Four (4) ALTERNATE metrics:

Page 28: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

How much pipe the rig can RACK geometrically is generally based on:

Size of the selected tubularsGeometry of the MBFootprint of the racking floor

28

Page 29: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

4” 15.7# DP     w/ new NC40 5.25” OD TJ

4 ½” 16.6# DP w/ new NC46 6.50” OD TJ

5” 19.5# DP     w/ new NC50 6.625” OD TJ

Common drillpipe dimensions: 

29

Page 30: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

RACKING CAPACITIES based on MB geometry:126 triple stands w/4” DP/HWDP (3570m)108 triple stands w/4 ½” or 5” DP/HWDP (3060m)10 triple stands of 6 ½” collars (280m)

30

Page 31: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

A space between the DS & ODS pipe is retained to:Lay‐down directional tools when trippingCreate clear path for wireline when logging at TDRun long string of casing when on a multi‐well pad

m31

Page 32: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

Gatorbacks, commonly used in the Canadian drilling industry to prevent iceplugs, can limit the number of stands that can be RACKED ‐regardless of pipe size

32

Page 33: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

Distinct metrics that would more clearly define the geometrical RACKING capability of a drilling rig:

RACKING CAPACITY (m) of 4” DP/HWDP

RACKING CAPACITY (m) of 4 ½” or 5”DP/HWDP

RACKING CAPACITY (m) of COLLARS

33

Page 34: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

Four (4) ALTERNATE metrics:

What can the rig PULL?

1. when stuck, or when running casing?

2. when POOH near TD?

How much pipe can the rig RACK?

3. based on geometry?

4. based on weight?

34

Page 35: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

The SETBACK CAPACITY typically reflects a uniform loading assumption that may not consider the localized loading of HWDP.

35

Q4: How much pipe can the rig RACK – based on weight?

Page 36: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

No monkeyboard.  No racking floor.

36

Page 37: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

No RACKING or SETBACK limitations.

37

Page 38: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

This presentation encourages the Operator and Drilling Contractor to collaboratively determine the loads that are specific to the planned well(s); and compare these estimated loads to a more transparent summary of DRILLING RIG CAPABILITIES – rather than rely on an ambiguous rig depth rating to evaluate the suitability of a particular rig for a particular well program.

Doing so will refine the rig selection process; and may ultimately reduce the COST to drill the planned well(s).

38

Page 39: Evaluation of Drilling Rig Selection

Thank‐you for your interest in this presentation.  

Are there any questions?

Evaluation of Drilling Rig Performance Characteristics

Quinton T. Foulston, P.Eng. Ph. 403‐716‐4642

39