evaluation of drug-drug interactions at the level of hepatic excretion

14
Evaluation of drug-drug interactions at the level of hepatic excretion Stanislav Mičuda Department of Pharmacology, Charles University in Prague Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové 55. Česko-Slovenské Farmakologické dny 30.8.-1.9.2005, Hradec Králové

Upload: deva

Post on 11-Jan-2016

43 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

55. Česko-Slovenské Farmakologické dny 30.8.-1.9.2005, Hradec Králové. Evaluation of drug-drug interactions at the level of hepatic excretion. Stanislav Mičuda. Department of Pharmacology, Charles University in Prague Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové. 55. Farmakologické dny. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evaluation of drug-drug interactions  at the level of hepatic excretion

Evaluation of drug-drug interactions at the level of hepatic excretion

Stanislav Mičuda

Department of Pharmacology, Charles University in PragueFaculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové

55. Česko-Slovenské Farmakologické dny30.8.-1.9.2005, Hradec Králové

Page 2: Evaluation of drug-drug interactions  at the level of hepatic excretion

55. Farmakologické dnyHepatic

drug processing

MDR1

MDR3

NTCP

MRP2 MRP2

NTCP

BCRP

OCT1

MRP3

Phase IPhase II

BILE SALTS BULKY ORGANIC

COMPOUNDSORGANICANIONS

SMALL ORGANICCATIONS

OATs

BSEP

OATP2

Page 3: Evaluation of drug-drug interactions  at the level of hepatic excretion

Inhibition – MDR1

Shon JH; Clin Pharmacol Ther 2005;78(2):191-201 Kovarik JM; Clin Pharmacol Ther 1999;66(4):391-400

Itraconazole

Digoxin 0.125 mg +valspodar 400 mg 7-11 day

Page 4: Evaluation of drug-drug interactions  at the level of hepatic excretion

Greiner B; J Clin Invest 1999;104(2):147-53.

Induction – MDR1

Page 5: Evaluation of drug-drug interactions  at the level of hepatic excretion

In vivo

Single and Repeat Dose PharmacokineticsDrug Interaction StudiesMass Balance Excretion Studies Imaging StudiesIn Situ Tissue Perfusions

Preclinical -Clinical Studies

Mai I; Clin Pharmacol Ther 2004;76(4):330-40.Sasongko L; Clin Pharmacol Ther 2005;77(6):503-14.

99mTc-Sestamibi Scan following XR-9576

Page 6: Evaluation of drug-drug interactions  at the level of hepatic excretion

– a synthetic corticosteroid, (t1/2 = 36-54 h), eliminated mainly in the unchanged form in urine – induction of mrp2 protein expression?

SPC: 86698 DEXAMETHAZON LÉČIVA TBL 20X0.5MG-BLISTR LEX CZ

Dexamethasone

The aim of study

55. Farmakologické dny

influence of dexamethasone on expression and activity of mrp2

Methotrexate (MTX) as a selective substrate for mrp2

Probenecid as an inhibitor of mrp2

Page 7: Evaluation of drug-drug interactions  at the level of hepatic excretion

In vivo pharmacokinetics

Wistar male rats (Konárovice) - 3 groups (N = 6) Dex (25 mg/kg daily 4 days, p.o.),Control (Oliv. oil 4 days, p.o.), Probenecid 70 mol/kg 3.33 mol/min.kg-1

simultaneously with MTX

Clearance study left jugular v. (MTX 22 mol/kg 164 nmol/kg.h-1 4 ml/min) right a. carotis (blood sampling - since 55‘ - 10 min) bladder (urine 0-90 min 10 min) bile duct (bile 0-90 min 10 min)

55. Farmakologické dny

Page 8: Evaluation of drug-drug interactions  at the level of hepatic excretion

MTX concentrations HPLC method with fluorescent detection *

Farmacokinetic analysis

55. Farmakologické dny

In vivo pharmacokinetics

CLtotal = Rinf / Css

CLbil = Cbil . Vbil / Css

CLren = CU.VU / Css

BE = Cbil . Vbil

UE = CU.VU

CLRratio = CLren / GFR

CLRratioU = CLren / (fU .GFR)

CLRS = (CLren / fU) - GFR

* Chladek J; J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 2000;744(2):307-13.

Page 9: Evaluation of drug-drug interactions  at the level of hepatic excretion

Pharmacokinetics of MTX in steady-state

55. Farmakologické dny

60 70 80 90 100

0

10

20

30

40Probenecid

Control

Dexamethasone

Time (min)

Me

tho

tre

xa

te (

uM

)

Page 10: Evaluation of drug-drug interactions  at the level of hepatic excretion

Pharmacokinetics of MTX in steady-state

55. Farmakologické dny

Control DEX 25 mg po Probenecid DIF

(fold) values DIF

(fold) Urine flow rate (l/min) 28.9 4.7 71.4 8.2 C 2.5 27.7 8.5 1.0

UE rate (nmol/ml.kg-1) 92.7 10.6

85.9 5.8 0.9 57.0 13.5 A 0.6

Bile flow rate (l/min) 25.2 1.6 28.0 2.7 1.1 32.7 2.8 A 1.3

BE rate (nmol/ml.kg-1) 98.5 8.2 124.0 9.9 A 1.3 62.0 5.2 B 0.6

Plasma (M) 18.4 1.3 20.2 2.2 1.1 35.4 1.2 C 1.9

CLR (ml/min.kg-1) 5.0 0.4 4.6 0.7 0.9 1.6 0.4 C 0.3

CLBile (ml/min.kg-1) 5.6 0.7 6.4 0.6 1.1 1.8 0.2 C 0.3

CLTOT (ml/min.kg-1) 9.2 0.6 8.7 1.0 0.9 4.7 0.2 C 0.5

CLCR (ml/min.kg-1) 4.8 0.6 4.9 0.4 0.9 3.6 0.4 0.7

fU 0.5 0.02 0.7 0.1 + 1.3 0.6 0.03 B 1.3

CLR/fu 10.0 0.2 6.7 0.2 B 0.7 2.4 0.2 C 0.2

CLR/GFR 1.1 0.9 1.1 0.4 0.9 0.5 0.5 B 0.4

CLRS 5.3 1.0 2.2 0.6 A 0.4 -1.2 0.8 C -0.2

CLR/(fU x GFR) 2.2 0.3 1.6 0.2 + 0.7 0.7 0.2 B 0.4

Values are means SEM A P < 0.05; B P < 0.01; C P < 0.001

Page 11: Evaluation of drug-drug interactions  at the level of hepatic excretion

55. Farmakologické dny

Dexametazon 25 mg/kgOlive oilRat liver - mrp2 – Dex per os

Control Dexamethasone Parameter for image analysis

Centr Port Centr Port

Proportion of visual field area occupied by mrp2 staining

0.13 ± 0.05 2.11 ± 0.772 2.92 ± 0.88 C 3.91 ± 1.14 A

Integral optical densities of mrp2 in visual field

28 ± 11 467 ± 1742 664 ± 202 C 903 ± 266 A

Values are means ± SEM of 6 rats. Centr - pericentral areas; Port - periportal areas; 1P<0.05, 2P<0.001 periportal vs pericentral areas; AP<0.05, CP<0.001 comparison of data from respective locations between control and dexamethasone (25 mg/kg daily, p.o. for 4 days) pretreated animals.

BE 1.3-foldCLbile 1.1-foldHistol 3.1-foldWestern 2.4-fold

Page 12: Evaluation of drug-drug interactions  at the level of hepatic excretion

Pharmacokinetics of Rho-123

55. Farmakologické dny

Influence of DEXon P-gp activity

Control DEX 25 mg po

DIF (fold)

Urine flow rate (l/min) 26.0 4.0 96.0 12.0 C 3.6

UE rate (nmol/ml.kg-1) 0.10 0.04 0.28 0.06 B 2.7

Bile flow rate (l/min) 27.0 2.0 28.0 4.0 1.0

BE rate (nmol/ml.kg-1) 0.26 0.04 0.57 0.14 A 2.2

Plasma (M) 0.12 0.02 0.08 0.003 B 0.6

CLR (ml/min.kg-1) 0.71 0.24 3.70 0.68 B 5.2

CLBile (ml/min.kg-1) 2.22 0.34 7.88 2.29 A 3.5

CLTOT (ml/min.kg-1) 21.68 1.00 29.26 1.18 B 1.4

CLCR (ml/min.kg-1) 1.19 1.01 1.34 1.20 1.1

CLR/GFR 0.59 0.08 2.90 0.10 B 4.9

Values are means SEM A P < 0.05; B P < 0.01; C P < 0.001 Ctrl DEX

BE 2.2-foldCLbile 3.5-foldHistol 2.3-foldWestern 2.8-foldReal RT-PCR 3.1-fold

Page 13: Evaluation of drug-drug interactions  at the level of hepatic excretion

Conclusion

Drug-drug interactions may be of great clinical importance - A significant number is transport protein-mediated- in vivo studies – a complex view of pharmacokinetics

and mechanisms using model substrates

- in vivo studies – verification of outcome from in vitro models

allowing predictions- interspecies extrapolation

Glucocorticoids and MRP2 vs. MTX- induction of proteins without changes in pharmacokinetics of MTX

55. Farmakologické dny

Page 14: Evaluation of drug-drug interactions  at the level of hepatic excretion

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

55. Farmakologické dny

Grants GAUK 89/2002/CMŠMT EC-B25.001

Co-workersLeoš FuksaJolana CermanováEva Brčáková Jitka Hájková František ŠtaudPetr Pávek Lucie MundlováJan OsterreicherJaroslav MokrýJaroslav ChládekJiřina Martínková

...enjoy adventure of every experiment...