evaluation of learning and teaching

Upload: marlon-calma

Post on 05-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    1/47

    EVALUATION OF LEARNING AND

    TEACHING

    Marlon R. Calma, R.N.

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    2/47

    Learning Objectives:

    At the end of the discussion the

    listener will be able to:

    Define and give the purposes of

    evaluation in academic and in clinical

    setting.

    Enumerate the steps in evaluation and

    explain how it varies in teaching and inlearning.

    Discuss points on how to effectively

    evaluate the students and the teacher.

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    3/47

    Topics of discussion:

    Evaluation defined

    Purposes of Evaluation

    Steps in evaluationCriteria for selection of Evaluative

    Devices

    Evaluating Students PerformanceEvaluating the Teacher

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    4/47

    Introduction:

    Have you ever helped a child with a school

    assignment?

    Been asked by a co-worker for advice on a

    project?

    Offered suggestions in your institution.

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    5/47

    Evaluation:

    In education, it is the process of judging the effectiveness of

    educational experiences through careful appraisal.

    It involves measurement but is different from it.

    Measurement is appraisal in terms of fixed standard, whereasevaluation implies the use of relative and flexible standards.

    Involves a continuous process of collecting, recording,

    assembling and interpreting information.

    Made in relation to the objectives that has been previouslydetermined by the faculty, individual teachers and students.

    It is a process by which those concerned with goals, processes

    and programs collect data, make judgments and revise as

    necessary.

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    6/47

    The Centrality of Evaluation

    In Teaching and Learning

    For the teacher is continually concerned about the

    effect on her students of what they and she isdoing. And the teacher continually seeks to find

    ways in which both she and the individual student

    can determine the extent to which then student is

    really mastering the ability to use the ideas andskills developed not only in a particular course but

    in the curriculum as well.

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    7/47

    The Centrality of Evaluation

    In Nursing

    the very essence of nursing requires the nurse toevaluate constantly the patients nursing needs as

    well as her own activities in meeting these needs,guiding the patients in his own evaluation of his

    own health needs, determining how well he ismeeting them and planning with him to maintainan optimal level of health.

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    8/47

    The Complexity of Evaluation

    In Teaching and Learning

    Evaluation is a much broader concept than markingand giving grades at the end of a course. Thus,evaluation includes both measurement andappraisal

    1. Measurement is qualitative.2. Appraisal is concerned with the values derivedfrom the exercise of judgment, insight,understandings and the subjective elements of

    value judgment.

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    9/47

    The Complexity of Evaluation

    In Nursing

    Evaluation in nursing require more than theevaluation of the cognitive outcomes of knowledgeand understanding; it requires evaluation of thestudents personal traits, because nursing is a

    personal service, one in which interpersonalrelationships are important; and personality playsan important role in establishing effectiverelationship with patients.

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    10/47

    I. Purposes of Evaluation:

    1. To determine the level of knowledge and understandingof the student in her classes at various times during thesemester.

    2. To determine the level of the students clinicalperformance at various stages.

    3. To become aware of the specific difficulties of individualstudents, or of an entire class, as a basis for further

    teaching.4. To diagnose each students strengths and weaknessesand to suggest remedial measures which may be neededto help the student bring their full potential in learning.

    5. To encourage students learning by measuring their

    achievement and informing them of their success.

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    11/47

    I. Purposes of Evaluation:

    6. To help students to acquire the attitude of, and skills in,self evaluation.

    7. To help the students to be become increasingly selfdirecting in their study.

    8. To provide the additional motivation of examinations thatprovides opportunity to practice critical thinking, theapplication of principles, the making of judgments, etc.

    9. To estimate the effectiveness of teaching and learning

    techniques, of subject content and of instructional mediain reaching the goals of her course.

    10.To gather information needed for administrative purposes,such as selecting students for honors courses, placementof students for advanced standing, writingrecommendations, meeting graduation requirements, etc.

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    12/47

    II. Steps in Evaluation:

    If we consider teaching, like any intelligent activity,

    as having three aspects:

    1. What do we seek to achieve (objectives)?2. How do we propose to achieve these objectives

    (procedures)?3. What have we achieved (outcomes)?

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    13/47

    II. Steps in Evaluation:

    1. Stating objectives.2. Defining changes in behavior expected as

    educational outcomes.

    3. Listing and briefly describing situations that giveopportunity for the expression of the behaviordesired.

    4. Developing appropriate and systematic means of

    eliciting kinds of behavior implied in objectives tobe evaluated.

    5. Deciding on ways of recording and summarizing(scoring, rating or describing) behavior and thebasis of evidence collected.

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    14/47

    II. Steps in Evaluation:

    6. Checking validity, reliability and difficulty of the

    measures used.7. Establishing conditions that permit the student togive her best performance.

    8. Assigning scores on the basis of the above

    steps.9. Developing methods of interpretation.

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    15/47

    III. Criteria for Selection of

    Evaluative Devices

    The major criteria used in selecting and/ordeveloping tests relate to:

    1. Sampling of the objectives2. Sampling of the content

    3. Validity4. Reliability5. Practicality6. Usefulness

    C l d E l ti

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    16/47

    Commonly used Evaluative

    Devices:

    1. Essay Examinations- highly regarded by

    college instructors because it is believe to be

    capable of measuring the higher mental

    processes involved in selecting and organizingideas, formulating and supportive hypotheses,

    logically developing an argument and writing

    creatively.

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    17/47

    Improving the quality of essay questions:

    Should be structured and limited inscope.

    Questions which ask the students to tellwhy, criticize, explain, compare,

    etc.

    The use of open book examination helpsto evaluate the ability of the student to

    find, assess and use information rather

    than to simply recall or restate it.

    Commonly used Evaluative

    Devices:

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    18/47

    Improving the reliability of essay tests: Read the same questions and answer in all

    papers rather than one complete paper at a

    time. Code papers, instead of using names while

    reading papers.

    After reading each answer, sort the papers in to

    several piles. Make the judgment that this paperiis the best, better, average, poor or failing.

    It is better not to give students an option onquestions (such as answering 4 questions out of

    8).

    Commonly used Evaluative

    Devices:

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    19/47

    2. Objective Examinations- use to seek more

    objective measurements of learning and

    teaching results. Consist of a large number of

    questions and statements. The mostcommonly used objective tests are:

    Commonly used Evaluative

    Devices:

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    20/47

    Examples:

    True or False

    Multiple ChoiceCompletion (sentence)

    Single answer or multiple

    recall(enumeration)Matching

    Identification

    Commonly used Evaluative

    Devices:

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    21/47

    Advantages:

    More reliable than essay or other types.

    Effective means of teaching and testingbecause they save time and yield more

    reliable, valid, fair and impartial results.

    Eliminate most of the objectionablefeatures of the essay type.

    Can be scored in less time.

    Commonly used Evaluative

    Devices:

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    22/47

    Disadvantages:

    It provides little or no opportunity for themeasurement of the students ability to

    organize and to express her thoughts orto handle situations.

    More time is required to prepare goodobjective than essay questions.

    In construction of objective-test items,there is always a tendency to make them

    more or less factual.

    Commonly used Evaluative

    Devices:

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    23/47

    Preparation of Objective Examinations:

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    24/47

    3. Objective problem Situation Test-test critical

    thinking and ability to apply scientific

    principles. The one that describes a situation,

    not previously presented to the students, withsufficient detail to point up the problem

    involved. Following a description of the

    situation, possible solutions or conclusionsand a series of plausible reasons supporting

    these solutions are given.

    Commonly used Evaluative

    Devices:

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    25/47

    Advantages: They can be used to represent those patterns of

    behavior that constitute nursing competence,

    and they can specify accurately acceptable levelof competence.

    Less time consuming.

    Useful to determine ability to apply principles to

    new or related situations. The type of errors made by the students in the

    use of basic principles and concepts can be

    analyzed more easily.

    Commonly used Evaluative

    Devices:

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    26/47

    Disadvantages:

    Less time consuming to prepare

    Require great skills to prepare valid,reliable problem situations.

    Commonly used Evaluative

    Devices:

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    27/47

    4. Standardized Test-this are Tests and Scales

    that have met the criteria of testing.

    Three types:

    Intelligence tests- usually attempt to indicate the

    capacity, the brightness or the native intelligence of the

    individual as compared with the norm for her age.

    Prognostic tests-intended to discover the possibilities

    of a students success in some specified area.

    Achievement tests- designed to indicate the

    accomplishment of the student in particular subjects or

    areas of the curriculum.

    Commonly used Evaluative

    Devices:

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    28/47

    5. Rating scales-methods of recording

    interpretations of behavior.

    6. Modified rating scales and observational

    techniques for evaluating nursing

    performance.

    Commonly used Evaluative

    Devices:

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    29/47

    IV. Evaluating Students Performance

    Themes, reports, notebooks and similar

    material are used widely as evaluation

    devices. They are important both as an

    educational tool and as evaluation device.

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    30/47

    V. Evaluating the Teacher

    The teacher who wishes to learn more about

    her over-all effectiveness as a teacher has

    access to several sources of information:

    Tape and video recordings

    Observation by a colleague

    Student opinion

    Teacher self evaluation

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    31/47

    1. Tape and Video Recordings- may be made of

    one or more class sessions and used as a

    means of evaluating the behavior of both

    teachers and students. This tape may reveal:

    The extent of student participation

    The quality of student comments and

    questionsStudent behavior

    Teacher contribution to class period

    V. Evaluating the Teacher

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    32/47

    2. Observation by a Colleague- having one

    colleague sits in on several classes and later

    gives frank appraisal of strengths and

    weaknesses.

    V. Evaluating the Teacher

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    33/47

    3. Student Opinion- Guthrie, whose work

    reflected the most extensive research in

    faculty ratings by students, argues that

    student evaluations, when carefully andproperly handled, provided the best criterion

    of quality instructions.

    V. Evaluating the Teacher

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    34/47

    4. Teacher Self Evaluation- introspective

    analyses of ones teaching practices are useful

    whether or not the evaluative activities are

    undertaken.

    V. Evaluating the Teacher

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    35/47

    Evaluating a Supervisor:

    EVALUATING STAFF NURSE

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    36/47

    EVALUATING STAFF NURSEPERFORMANCE

    Advantages of Performance Evaluation

    1. Provides the opportunity to define the job so that both the supervisor and the

    employee have the same understanding of what is to be done. This includes

    establishing the expectations of how it is to be done, as well as developing the

    standards which will be used in the formal evaluation process to apply the

    pertinent ratings.

    2. Provides the opportunity to review the period of evaluation and to discuss

    both negative and positive aspects of employee performance and to

    acknowledge meritorious performance.

    3. Provides the opportunity to redefine the requirements for the next evaluation

    period, as necessary.

    4. Permits the supervisor and the employee to discuss upward mobility and/or

    identify training needs.

    EVALUATING STAFF NURSE

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    37/47

    Method of Evaluation

    1. Employee performance is rated for each performance

    factor on the approved form on the basis of performance

    expectations determined by the supervisor.

    2. Upon appointment, the employees supervisor will provide

    the employee with a copy of the job description describing

    the qualifications, essential functions, duties and

    responsibilities of the position.

    3. Performance expectations for each of the performancefactors should be provided to the employee to allow the

    employee to meet the work expectations after appointment

    or assignment to a newly created or significantly modified

    position.

    EVALUATING STAFF NURSEPERFORMANCE

    EVALUATING STAFF NURSE

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    38/47

    Who Will Do the Evaluating?

    The immediate supervisor rates the performance of his/her

    subordinates. Input from peers and subordinates may be used

    and evaluation methods may vary, but it should be

    understood that the supervisors rating is the rating which willbe used.

    On some factors, when it is not possible to actually evaluate

    the performance, supervisors are encouraged to state that

    they have not had the opportunity to observe this factorrather than rate without information.

    EVALUATING STAFF NURSEPERFORMANCE

    EVALUATING STAFF NURSE

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    39/47

    Frequency of Formal Evaluations

    Informal performance evaluations occur on an almost daily basis for most

    employees. Every time a supervisor communicates with an employee

    regarding his/her work, an informal evaluation has occurred. Its important

    for supervisors to document informal evaluations to assist them in

    producing the formal evaluation.

    Formal evaluations refer to those times when a written performance

    evaluation is produced and reviewed with the employee. Formal reviewsshould occur at least annually.

    EVALUATING STAFF NURSEPERFORMANCE

    EVALUATING STAFF NURSE

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    40/47

    Developing Evaluation Standards

    Rating values (Unsatisfactory through Outstanding) are

    defined at the bottom of the evaluation form. The following

    performance factors are listed:

    1. Quality of Work

    2. Quantity of Work

    3. Job Knowledge4. Working Relationships

    5. Supervisory Skills

    EVALUATING STAFF NURSEPERFORMANCE

    EVALUATING STAFF NURSE

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    41/47

    A. Halo/Horns Effect

    The Halo effect is the tendency to generalize from one specific positive

    employee trait to other aspects of the individuals performance.

    The Horns effect, on the other hand, occurs when a particular negative

    trait or behavior blinds the supervisor to strengths of the individual being

    evaluated.

    EVALUATING STAFF NURSEPERFORMANCE

    EVALUATING STAFF NURSE

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    42/47

    B. Similar to Me and Contrast Errors

    Similar to Me errors are most likely to occur in a situation where obvious

    similarities exist between supervisor and the employee. If you find your

    rating in terms of any kind of stereotype such as college educated people

    are brighter than those without degrees or people who enjoy theoutdoors are better adjusted then you are probably making this kind of

    error.

    Contrast errors take several different forms. In this type of situation, the

    supervisor rates employees who differ from himself/herself lower than

    they should be rated simply because they are different in terms of

    attitude, sex, ethnic background, education, etc.

    EVALUATING STAFF NURSEPERFORMANCE

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    43/47

    Evaluating patients learning:

    Evaluation of teaching-learning is a twofold

    process:Determining what the learner has

    learned.

    Assessing the nurses teachingeffectiveness.

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    44/47

    Benefits of Client Teaching:

    Improved quality of care.

    Shorter length of hospital stays.

    Decreased chance of hospitalreadmission.

    Greater compliance with prescribedtreatment regimens.

    Evaluating patients learning:

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    45/47

    The following strategies can be used to

    evaluate client learning:

    Oral questioning.

    Observation.

    Return demonstration.

    Written follow-up (e.g.questionnaires).

    Evaluating patients learning:

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    46/47

    Several activities can be used in evaluating

    teaching effectiveness:

    Feedback from the learner.

    Feedback from colleagues.

    Situational feedback.

    Self-evaluation.

    Evaluating patients learning:

  • 8/2/2019 Evaluation of Learning and Teaching

    47/47

    Thank You!!!