evaluation practice

32
Evaluation Practice Stephen Gilson, PhD. [email protected] Elizabeth DePoy, Ph.D. [email protected]

Upload: ronna

Post on 20-Jan-2016

25 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Evaluation Practice. Stephen Gilson, PhD. [email protected] Elizabeth DePoy, Ph.D. [email protected]. What is Evaluation Practice?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evaluation Practice

Evaluation Practice

Stephen Gilson, [email protected]

Elizabeth DePoy, Ph.D. [email protected]

Page 2: Evaluation Practice

What is Evaluation Practice?

• Evaluation Practice is the purposive application of diverse sets of evidence to the definition and clarification of social problems, to the identification of what is needed to resolve them, and of the way in which and extent to which problems have been resolved.

Page 3: Evaluation Practice

STEPS

• Clarification– Problem– Need Goals and Objectives

• Reflexive Intervention• Outcome Assessment• Dissemination

Page 4: Evaluation Practice

Clarification Stage

• Problem• Need• Goals and Objectives for Practice

Page 5: Evaluation Practice

• There is a significant distinction between problem and need.

Page 6: Evaluation Practice

Definition of Problem

• A problem is defined as a conceptual value assertion.

Page 7: Evaluation Practice

Definition of Need

• A need is a systematic, evidence-based claim linked to all or part of a problem, which specifies conditions and actions necessary to resolve the part of the problem to be addressed.

Page 8: Evaluation Practice

Nature of Evidence

• Unlike many empirically-based practice models, the nature of evidence is not rigid and prescriptive.

Page 9: Evaluation Practice

Final Step of Clarification

• The final phase of clarification involves setting goals and objectives that proceed from a clear statement of need.

• Goals and objectives provide the structure for interventions and posit desired intervention outcomes at one or more time intervals.

Page 10: Evaluation Practice

Goals

• Broad statements about the ideal or "hoped for."

• They look forward in time to specific "desirables."

• They also look back to the value context because they emerge directly from the statement of what is needed to remediate a problem.

Page 11: Evaluation Practice

Objectives

• Operationalized goals.

• Applying the concept of operationalization, objectives identify how abstract goals will be met.

Page 12: Evaluation Practice

Reflexive Intervention

• The thinking and action strategies during prevention and intervention

• The provider engages in systematic monitoring of practice, of resources, and of use of self as well as scanning other internal and external influences that impact the practice process and outcome.

Page 13: Evaluation Practice

• The scholar/professional who applies the principles of reflexive intervention carefully scrutinizes the implementation of goals and objectives through systematically monitoring intervention.

Page 14: Evaluation Practice

• In Evaluation Practice, the scholar/professional is aware of the evidence that supports his/her decision making, carefully looks at all practice to obtain clarity about what was done, and considers feedback from engaging in practice action processes.

Page 15: Evaluation Practice

Outcome Assessment

• Outcome assessment is a set of thinking and action processes conducted to ascertain and document what occurs as a result of being voluntarily or involuntarily exposed to a purposive prevention or intervention process, and to assess the worth of an action.

Page 16: Evaluation Practice

• Evaluation practice highlights the importance of assessing both planned and unintended occurrences.

Page 17: Evaluation Practice

Dissemination

• Evaluation Practice does not end with summative strategies. Rather dissemination, an essential step, advances prevention and intervention knowledge through sharing the entire Evaluation Practice process from problem definition through outcome assessment.

Page 18: Evaluation Practice

• Dissemination is purposive and thus should be shaped by an understanding of what the audience will value as believable and important, and by assuring that the information that is shared is accessible and anchored on evidence that is relevant to the receiver of information.

Page 19: Evaluation Practice

Implementing Evaluation Practice

Page 20: Evaluation Practice

Problem Mapping

A thinking technique used to expand and contextualize an initial problem statement.

Page 21: Evaluation Practice

Problem Mapping

• The problem map is constructed by stating the initial problem presented by the individual, group, community, system as conceptualized by that entity, and then asking two questions two analytic questions: “what causes the problem?” and “what are the consequences of the problem?”

Page 22: Evaluation Practice

• The same two questions are repeatedly posed for the causes and consequences that are articulated.

Page 23: Evaluation Practice

Illustration of Evaluation Practice

Page 24: Evaluation Practice

Alcohol abuse

Access to alcohol Poor social skills Genetic predisposition

Social context

Marketing of alcohol Cultural sanction

Dysfunction DependenceUnderemployment

PovertyPoor health

Page 25: Evaluation Practice

Need

• Prevention• Social marketing• Access policy change

Page 26: Evaluation Practice

Goal

• Implement relevant and responsive community programs to change sanction access and marketing messages

Page 27: Evaluation Practice

Objectives

• Change social context• Decrease access to alcohol• Change marketing messages

Page 28: Evaluation Practice

Reflexive Intervention

• Coordinated community prevention and social marketing

• Cost-benefit analysis

Page 29: Evaluation Practice

Outcome Assessment

• Community and social support for prevention• Prevention-positive marketing messages and

outcomes• Policy change• Access changes

Page 30: Evaluation Practice

Dissemination

• Presentation of formative and summative assessment at local, regional and national venues

Page 31: Evaluation Practice

References

DePoy, E. & Gilson, S.F. ( 2008) Evaluation Practice. Boston MA: Taylor & Francis.

Extensive Bibliography listed in text.

Page 32: Evaluation Practice

Websites• http://www.ahcpr.gov/clinic/epc/• http://www.mco.edu/lib/ebm.html#Cochrane• http://healthlinks.washington.edu/ebp• http://www.cche.net/usersguides/main.asp• http://www.shef.ac.uk/uni/academic/R-Z/scharr/

triage/docs/systematic/1.htm