evaluation report 3 sendi...

Evaluation report SENDI project

T H I R D M E E T I N G - P R A G U E

This report contains the evaluation analysis of the filled out questionnaire about the Kick off meeting in Granada of the SENDI project. All questions will be covered with a small evaluation supported by a

diagram.

9 januari 2014 Wri tten by: Tessa Grefkens, Pro Work

T

1

This report contains the evaluation analysis of the filled out questionnaire of the third meeting in Prague of the SENDI project. All questions will be covered with a small evaluation supported by a diagram.

07/ 01/ 2015

Written by Tessa Grefkens – PRO WORK

2

1

Eval

uatio

n re

port

SEN

DI p

roje

ct |

9-1

-201

4

Evaluation report SENDI project Third meeting - Prague

In this evaluation report all questions will be evaluated through a concise analysis supported with several

diagrams. All 13 questions are answered by 5 participants of the meeting. In this report all questions will be

evaluated separately (so N=5 at the questions). At the end of this evaluation report a general analysis of

the findings concerning this Third meeting will be given at question 13.

2

Eval

uatio

n re

port

SEN

DI p

roje

ct |

9-1

-201

4

Question 1 – Efficiency and effectivity of Third meeting

Remarks/Explanations

Well organised and executed without undue time loss

Regarding to the diagram and the extra remarks, that were made by some participants it seems, that again

both the efficiency and effectivity of the third meeting were sufficient. The partners state the efficiency was

a little bit better than the effectivity. This indicates, that everyone was al little bit more satisfied with the

meeting-process and realization (efficiency), than with the outcome (effectivity). The remark made is also

positive.

Answered : 5 Skipped : 0

3

Eval

uatio

n re

port

SEN

DI p

roje

ct |

9-1

-201

4

Question 2 – Discussion project subjects & -activit ies


-

Concerning the project subjects and activities, the diagram makes clear, that everybody seem to be very

positive about all the project subjects, that are discussed in the meeting in Prague. Especially the “General

information about the development of the project” scored high. But also the “Welcome”, “E-learning

support review, adding new ideas”, “General discussion among partners” and the “Review of all partners’

tasks and deadlines” scored very sufficient to sufficient. The “Compilation of Handbook with all the criteria

of SENDI courses”, “Dissemination (Project brochure + 2nd newsletter + Other dissemination channels)”

and the “Certification of trainers (on the system)” scored the least well, but still sufficient and no element

on the agenda scored unsatisfied.


4

Eval

uatio

n re

port

SEN

DI p

roje

ct |

9-1

-201

4

Question 3 – Discussion al l necessary topics


All necessary topics were discussed and the face-to-face discussion was very useful for planning the further project activities. On schedule as far as I can tell

Obviously, all topics of the agenda were discussed during the third meeting of the SENDI project in Prague

as can be seen in the diagram and from the two remark made.


5

Eval

uatio

n re

port

SEN

DI p

roje

ct |

9-1

-201

4

Question 4 – Role tasks after third meeting


Most immediate needs completed.

According to all participants the role tasks were clear to them when they left the meeting in November. Also

the remark made confirms this.


6

Eval

uatio

n re

port

SEN

DI p

roje

ct |

9-1

-201

4

Question 5 – Active participation of al l partners


NTC wasn't present at the meeting, but is very present in the project! Everyone participated fully. Partner 4 couldn't participate in this meeting.

It seems, that all partners scored very positive according to the partners who filled out this questionnaire.

Especially Stichting Pro Work (NL), scored high with only “Very Sufficient”. Also Asociacion Agifodent (ES)

and ASDAN (UK) score high, followed by Euroface Consult (CZ) and Ian Lynch (the Ingots UK). National

Training Centre (BG) scored the least well, but this can be linked to the fact they weren’t present at the

meeting, but they are very present in the project as some partner states.


7

Eval

uatio

n re

port

SEN

DI p

roje

ct |

9-1

-201

4

Question 6 – Opinion hosting organisation Euroface Consult ing


Everything ran smoothly.

As becomes clear by the diagram, the coordination of Euroface Consulting of this third meeting is reviewed

only mostly very sufficient. The remark indicates, the meeting “ran smoothly”!


8

Eval

uatio

n re

port

SEN

DI p

roje

ct |

9-1

-201

4

Question 7 – Keeping made promises as partners


-

The only answer on this question by 5 participants of the survey is, that all partners fulfil their tasks as

planned and agreed on in the project plan and during this third meeting. No explanations were given.


9

Eval

uatio

n re

port

SEN

DI p

roje

ct |

9-1

-201

4

Question 8 – Quality of partner teamwork and cooperation so far


Team works very well together.

Most of the participants filled out “Very satisfied” at this question regarding the quality of teamwork and

partner cooperation and one partner filled out “Satisfied”, what indicates everyone is very positive about

the quality and development of teamwork and partner cooperation so far and even more positive than after

the second meeting. Two remark made, confirm this answer “The teams works very well together”!


10

Eval

uatio

n re

port

SEN

DI p

roje

ct |

9-1

-201

4

Question 9 – Answering statements


-

As can be seen in the diagram, the partners are especially satisfied concerning “the frequency of the future

project meetings”. Secondly they are satisfied with “the minutes of meeting” and “The division of roles and

tasks between the project partners”, but also “the communication between the project partners” scores

sufficient. The least well is the score again for the “the guidance and support of the project coordinator”,

but why remains unclear.


11

Eval

uatio

n re

port

SEN

DI p

roje

ct |

9-1

-201

4

Question 10 – Opinion about project progress and process so far

What is your general opinion about the project progress and process so far (including the future meeting locations, project activities, -content, development, et cetera)? Please describe your opinion in the text box below:


Project has been progressing as it was planned; all the goals are continuously met. I think we are having a good project so far and we are looking forward to the future. In my opinion the project is very well organized towards the project goals achievement. Some good refinements of the process, technology and methods in the light of experience. Everything is on track and some good original work is being developed that will benefit the target groups. The project is being developed according to the application form and all partners are working hard to meet deadlines and fulfill the final project products.

According to the answers, all partners who contribute to this survey seem to be again all satisfied with the

project progress and process until now and are hopeful in terms of the project progress and process in the

future. This third meeting seem to be contributing to a better future perspective, better cooperation and

more motivation to bring this project to a positive end.

12

Eval

uatio

n re

port

SEN

DI p

roje

ct |

9-1

-201

4

Question 11 – Opinions about statements


Experience shows that the outcomes will be fit for purpose.

The partners are especially satisfied with the progress of our SENDI project so far. Secondly they are

confident with reaching the project goals within the project period, they are satisfied with the way all

partners are co-operating in this project and they are confident the quality of our project results will be

sufficient. The two elements that score the least well are the “confidence our project ´products´ will be

used after our project has ended” and the “confidence that our project ´products´ will have an important

added value for flexible and tailor made learning and teaching, but they score still sufficient. The remark

made is again positive.


13

Eval

uatio

n re

port

SEN

DI p

roje

ct |

9-1

-201

4

Question 12 – Suggestion to improving project coordination


Have no stress to early. Sometimes things need time and the quality is more important than the quantity!

In relation to the diagram and the remarks made, the overall view of the participants is, that no

improvements have to be made, but one remark is made “Have no stress to early. Sometimes things need

time and the quality is more important than the quantity!”.


14

Eval

uatio

n re

port

SEN

DI p

roje

ct |

9-1

-201

4

Question 13 – General remarks

If you feel anything has been forgotten or in case you have any questions or comments with respect to this questionnaire or the project progress/process/content, please add your remarks here!


No, we (as PRO WORK) are happy with the project so-far :) No I think everything has been covered.

As made clear by all answers, the diagrams and the remarks/explanations, and also at this question all

partners seem to be again positive about the progression of the project.

Third meeting

The partners state the efficiency of this third meeting was a little bit better than the effectivity. This

indicates, that everyone was al little bit more satisfied with the meeting-process and realization (efficiency),

than with the outcome (effectivity). The remark made is also positive (Q1). Concerning the project subjects

and activities, it seems that everybody seem to be very positive about all the project subjects, that are

discussed in the meeting in Prague. Especially the “General information about the development of the

project” scored high. But also the “Welcome”, “E-learning support review, adding new ideas”, “General

discussion among partners” and the “Review of all partners’ tasks and deadlines” scored very sufficient to

sufficient. The “Compilation of Handbook with all the criteria of SENDI courses”, “Dissemination (Project

brochure + 2nd newsletter + Other dissemination channels)” and the “Certification of trainers (on the

system)” scored the least well, but still sufficient and no element on the agenda scored unsatisfied (Q2). All

topics of the agenda were discussed during the third meeting of the SENDI project in Prague as can be

seen in the diagram and from the two remark made (Q3). And according to all participants the role tasks

were clear to them when they left the meeting in November. Also the remark made confirms this (Q4).

Regarding the participation in the project especially Stichting Pro Work (NL), scored high with only “Very

Sufficient”. Also Asociacion Agifodent (ES) and ASDAN (UK) score high, followed by Euroface Consult (CZ)

and Ian Lynch (the Ingots UK). National Training Centre (BG) scored the least well, but this can be linked to

the fact they weren’t present at the meeting, but they are very present in the project as some partner states

(Q5). As becomes clear, the coordination of Euroface Consulting of this third meeting is reviewed only

mostly very sufficient. The remark indicates, the meeting “ran smoothly” (Q6).

General SENDI remarks

All partners fulfil their tasks as planned and agreed on in the project plan and during this third meeting,

according to the filled out questionnaires (Q7). And most of the participants filled out “Very satisfied” at the

question regarding the quality of teamwork and partner cooperation and one partner filled out “Satisfied”,

what indicates everyone is very positive about the quality and development of teamwork and partner

cooperation so far and even more positive than after the second meeting. Two remarks made, confirm this

answer “The teams works very well together” (Q8). The partners are especially satisfied concerning “the

frequency of the future project meetings”. Secondly they are satisfied with “the minutes of meeting” and

“The division of roles and tasks between the project partners”. The least well is the score again for the “the

guidance and support of the project coordinator”, but why remains unclear (Q9).

15

Eval

uatio

n re

port

SEN

DI p

roje

ct |

9-1

-201

4

According to the other answers, all partners who contribute to this survey seem to be again all satisfied with

the project progress and process until now and are hopeful in terms of the project progress and process in

the future. This third meeting seem to be contributing to a better future perspective, better cooperation and

more motivation to bring this project to a positive end (Q10). When answering statements, the partners are

especially satisfied with the progress of our SENDI project so far. Secondly they are confident with reaching

the project goals within the project period, they are satisfied with the way all partners are co-operating in

this project and they are confident the quality of our project results will be sufficient. The two elements that

score the least well are the “confidence our project ´products´ will be used after our project has ended”

and the “confidence that our project ´products´ will have an important added value for flexible and tailor

made learning and teaching, but they score still sufficient. The remark made is again positive (Q11).

In relation to the last question, the overall view of the participants is, that no improvements have to be

made, but one (positive) remark is made “Have no stress to early. Sometimes things need time and the

quality is more important than the quantity!” (Q12).

Communication & Collaboration between partners

As stated before, the communication between project partners scored sufficient and every partner who

filled in this questionnaire seem to be very positive about the partner communication and collaboration in

the future (Q9).

TO-DO l ist

- Be more positive about the future of the SENDI project!

- Continuation of this way of teamwork between partners in the SENDI project future!

evaluation report 3 sendi...

Documents