every child matters: change for children programme structure tom jeffery programme board delivery...
TRANSCRIPT
Every Child Matters: Change for Children Programme Structure
Tom Jeffery
ProgrammeBoard
Delive
ry P
rogr
amm
es
Sup
port
ing
Pro
gram
mes
SRO ProgrammeReview
ProgrammeOffice
Mark Davies
Children’s Health Group
Naomi Eisenstadt
Parents, Parenting &Relationship support
Cross CuttingProgrammes
Anne Jackson
Strategy
Anne Weinstock
Youth
Naomi Eisenstadt
Sure Start &Extended Schools
Althea Efunshile
Safeguarding
Sheila Scales
SupportingChange
Jeanette Pugh
Change inPractice
ECM/ Schools forum
Links to OGDs
Home Office
Health
ODPM
DWP
DCMS
Change in Practice Programme
Change In PracticeProgramme
Change in PracticeProgramme board
SRO: Jeanette Pugh
Every Child Matters: Changefor Children
Programme BoardSRO: Tom Jeffery
Change for Childrenprogramme office
SRO Programme Review
Change in Practice SROReview Group
Change in PracticeProgramme Office
ProgM: Richard Watts
IS Index ProjectSRO Jeanette Pugh
RO: Bill LimondPM: Michael Charles
Building CapacityProject
RO: Chris WellsPM: Ike Nwaku
Integrated WorkingProject
RO: Peter MucklowPM: Sharon Pitchford
Children’s trust -Governance andStrategy Project
RO: Andrew SargentPM: Diana Miles
DA(CP)SoS for Education and Skills
“To deliver a solution to facilitate communication between
practitioners from different services and agencies which
will enable them to share information appropriately and
securely for the benefit of children, young people and
families”
Index Project Mission Statement
The IS Index project going forward
OGC Gateway 1Sept 05
DA(CP) Auth. to Proceed next
stageOct 05
Procurement2006
Build & Pilot2007
Deployment2008
Business/Benefits Case
Requirements and Design (incl. UID)
Procurement and Implementation
Stakeholder & Communications
Policy
Phases
Work stream
Key links (existing or planned) with other national initiatives
IS Index
CAF
Connecting for Health
Lead Professiona
l
Multi-agency Working
Government Connects
CJIT
e-Gov
NRUC
Common Core
ICS
TB experience
Children Act 2004 & other legislation
ECM & other guidance / policies
Parliamentary Briefings, Q&A
Other experience
Trailblazers
Public
Project Team
MPs
Legal Advice
Responding to our many stakeholders
Steering Groups
RO’s & SRO’s
Select Committees
Policy Makers
Practitioners & Managers
Other ProjectTeams
Other Gov Depts
DELIVERING THE IS INDEX
Our Key Stakeholders
• Trailblazers
• LAs and other practitioner organisations:
• ISA Project Managers
• IT Manager
• Other Government Depts
• Information Commissioner
• Children’s Commissioner
• Data Suppliers
• Infrastructure Providers
• ISAG & Boards (Index - ECM)
TODAY
Where we have come from
During January and February 160+ stakeholders, across local statutory and voluntary sectors
Senior Managers
Service/Middle/Operational Managers
IT Managers
Front-Line Practitioners
Admin/Operational Staff
Validate case studies, explain work/business processes
Develop high level requirements for an Index
Our process for identifying IS Index requirements involves a series of workshops
Business Scenarios
1st Regional Workshops
Process Steps
Assumptions
Principles
Issues
Queries
Validated Processes
Validated Requirements
Trailblazer Workshops
2nd Regional Workshops
Common Business Processes
Requirements
Issues
What the Trailblazers tell us
Practitioners are enthusiastic about information sharing
An Information Sharing Index has to address the national dimension
Need an Index to share information efficiently and effectively
Stakeholder Engagement to October
TrailblazerEvent 225 July
L.A. (Leeds)Event 113 July
L.A. (Leeds)Event 2
3 August
L.A.(London)Event 115 July
L.A.(London)Event 2
5 August
Health Practitioner Manager Event
OGDs re Data Sources
VCSOs via ISAG
Sub-Group
LA Senior Managers via ADSS
etc.
Strategic Options for DA(CP) Consideration
No National INDEX Project“Do Nothing”
DevelopIntegratedINDEXES
DevelopLocal
INDEXES
Invest inFront-LineResources
Benefits enabled by an Index Practitioners can verify identity of a child
Identification of children missing
universal services
Reduction in wasted visits and searches
when children move away
Fewer children lost / gone missing
following move away
Better intervention and support decisions
Faster decision-making and earlier
intervention
Improved continuity of services for
children
Better understanding of children’s
circumstances, including carers and
practitioner involvement
Prioritisation of practitioner contact
Reduced duplication of effort in
assessment of families
Reduced duplication of information
provided by families
Better informed national and local service
planning