evidence-based reentry practices in a jail setting gary christensen corrections administrator...

20
Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting Gary Christensen Corrections Administrator Dutchess County Sheriff’s Office

Upload: ralf-hill

Post on 01-Jan-2016

237 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting Gary Christensen Corrections Administrator Dutchess County Sheriff’s Office

Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting

Gary ChristensenCorrections Administrator

Dutchess County Sheriff’s Office

Page 2: Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting Gary Christensen Corrections Administrator Dutchess County Sheriff’s Office

Realities • Mid-Year 2004 - 2.2 million incarcerated (Beck & Harrison,

2005 - U.S. Dept. of Justice)

• Highest rate per capita in History – 726 persons per 100,000 citizens – World leader – Russia 2nd @ 564/100,000

• Sanctions Overall (Probation, Parole, Jail, Prison) • 1.8 + million (1980)• 7 + million (current) • 388% increase vs. approx. 25% US population increase • WHY?

• Today, nationwide, as well as locally, 80% of incarceration relates to substance or alcohol abuse (Belanko, et al.; US Dept. of Justice; National Institute of Corrections)

crime directly related to abuse (DWI to Criminal Sale), getting money for, under the influence of, severe drug/alcohol history, selling, etc.

Page 3: Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting Gary Christensen Corrections Administrator Dutchess County Sheriff’s Office

U.S. Sanctioning Realities - RaceChart #1

Sanctions - Race

32%

40%

44%

56%

45%

41%39%

30%

20%18%

15%

12%

3%1% 2% 2%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Prison-State/Fed Parole Jail Probation

Sanction Type

% o

f R

ace

White

Black

Hispanic

Other

Page 4: Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting Gary Christensen Corrections Administrator Dutchess County Sheriff’s Office

U.S. Sanctioning Realities – Race(Beck & Harrison, 2005 - U.S. Dept. of Justice)

Page 5: Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting Gary Christensen Corrections Administrator Dutchess County Sheriff’s Office

Prisoner Recidivism Langan & Levin (2002)

• Sample size – n=272,111– within 3 years of release

• 67.5% were rearrested • 46.9% were reconvicted

• 51.8% returned to prison – Offenses and Violations

Page 6: Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting Gary Christensen Corrections Administrator Dutchess County Sheriff’s Office

Realities

• Average # of felonies committed by ONE active drug user = 140 per year (Belanko, et al.; US Dept. of Justice)

• Over 90% of our local jail populations will transition directly to our streets

• 80% of those who recidivate will do so within 6 months post-release

Page 7: Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting Gary Christensen Corrections Administrator Dutchess County Sheriff’s Office

Is there need to change our practice?

Do we practice in the best interests of the public?

Page 8: Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting Gary Christensen Corrections Administrator Dutchess County Sheriff’s Office

Can work within a jail facility contribute to “beyond the walls”

long-term public safety?

Page 9: Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting Gary Christensen Corrections Administrator Dutchess County Sheriff’s Office

How do or can jails work with or as part of our system of corrections?

What do jails do to enhance long-term public safety?

Page 10: Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting Gary Christensen Corrections Administrator Dutchess County Sheriff’s Office

How is EBP different in jails?

…inter-jurisdiction

….in community corrections?

….in prisons?

How is it the same?

Page 11: Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting Gary Christensen Corrections Administrator Dutchess County Sheriff’s Office

What part do our actions/attitudes have in the

current state of our system of corrections?

Page 12: Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting Gary Christensen Corrections Administrator Dutchess County Sheriff’s Office

What initiatives/perspectives relative to offender sanctions are

important within your jurisdiction?

Rehabilitation, punishment, restoration, incapacitation, etc.

Page 13: Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting Gary Christensen Corrections Administrator Dutchess County Sheriff’s Office

Perspective within a system designed to

enhance long-term public safety

Treatment, strategy, or training?Rehabilitation VS. Habilitation?

Is there such a thing as a perfect treatment strategy?

Is failure a reality?

Page 14: Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting Gary Christensen Corrections Administrator Dutchess County Sheriff’s Office

Is there a treatment or strategy that can/will lessen the risk that

transitioning offenders will recidivate?

*Punishment and EBP*

Page 15: Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting Gary Christensen Corrections Administrator Dutchess County Sheriff’s Office

Risk Management/Reduction Strategies: must it be either or?

Incapacitation/ Incarceration Direct Contacts Supervision of Conditions Electronic Monitoring Drug Testing/ Screening Restraints Setting Limits

Treatment & Programming Cooperation & Collaboration Challenging Choice Ownership & Responsibility Teaching & Supporting Self (Risk Management) Communicating/ Upholding Limits

Clearly

RISK CONTROL RISK REDUCTION

SHORT-TERM CONTROL

LONG-TERM CHANGE

Sanction Intervention

Page 16: Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting Gary Christensen Corrections Administrator Dutchess County Sheriff’s Office

What can a jail staff do to contribute to

long-term public safety?

Collaborate, collaborate, collaborate…

Serve as a resource – educate others

Encourage system professionals to meet clients prior to their release – enhance responsivity

Assess with actuarial assessment

Measure outcomes – daily, weekly, long-term

Require a social learning environment - model

Plan for Transition – follow people and outcomes

Offer continuing service

Page 17: Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting Gary Christensen Corrections Administrator Dutchess County Sheriff’s Office

The Dutchess County Jail Transition Program is designed to:

Enhance public safety through the management of criminogenic risk factors, while considering the necessity for other types of interventions such as substance and/or alcohol treatment.

Facilitate the successful transition of offenders to our community.

Reduce recidivism.

Page 18: Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting Gary Christensen Corrections Administrator Dutchess County Sheriff’s Office

?Outcomes? • 3-year period November, 1998-November of 2001

(Christensen, 2002)

• over a 33% in reduction of recidivism

Comparison of Recdivism - Program (21.1%) VS. Control (54.2%)

107

4595

401

3882

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Program(21.1%)

Control(54.2%)

Program N=508; Control N=8477

Non-RecidivistIncarcerations

RecidivistIncarcerations

Page 19: Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting Gary Christensen Corrections Administrator Dutchess County Sheriff’s Office

?Outcomes? • 1998-current – Recidivism Rates remain at

approximately 25%

• Current study of all inmates who entered the transition program

– Combined recidivism rates of program inmates prior to their entry to the program = 65+%

– Aggregate Risk Score (LSI-R) = 28

– Rate of Recidivism post program release = 20%

Page 20: Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting Gary Christensen Corrections Administrator Dutchess County Sheriff’s Office

Outcomes-Daily measurement 2345

6789

1011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q RMy How

Week Transition Will I Work

Age Start Wk LSI Appli- Needs Change Group Individual Assign- Formal Letter to Group Release Trans. Extra

INMATE NAME ID# ID Date # cation Form Form Leader Counselor ment Contract Myself Present. Date Plan Group

Presentation Due Need TP Need LSI

CANNON, Isaiah 18801 A 6/26/06 1 x x 10/20/06

FULLER, Jedediah 19054 A 6/26/06 1 x x

STOKES, David JR. 24763 A 6/26/06 1 x x

HUNTER, Kelvin 24741 A 6/26/06 2 x x Moe Moe x B

ABBOTT, Anthony 19627 A 6/12/06 4 x x x x Moe Moe laundry x x 8/17/06 B

ABED EL HADI, Mahmoud 25687 M 6/19/06 4 x x x x Onaje Onaje School x x x 8/18/06 x B

ALLAH, Mondu 14676 A 5/22/06 4 x x x x Moe KM garbage x x x 9/12/06 x BD

ANTENUUCI, Joseph 1735 A 6/19/06 4 x x x x Moe Moe laundry x x x 9/19/06 x B

AURORA, Nazareth 15817 A 6/19/06 4 x x x x Onaje Pam laundry x x x 8/24/06 x B

CANNING, Robert 1326 A 5/22/06 4 x x x x Onaje Olmo x x 11/26/06 x B

CATTS, Clifton 10346 A 4/17/06 4 x x x x Onaje Olmo x x x PV x B

DALTON, Christopher 25791 A 7/3/06 4 X x x x Onaje Onaje x x B

DELGADO, George 24580 M 6/12/06 4 x x x x Onaje Onaje school x x x x B

DRAYTON, Shamik 17229 A 6/5/06 4 x x x x Onaje Anna school x x x B

EARLY, John 1051 A 4/3/06 4 x x x x Onaje Sylvia Outside x x 8/1/06 x B

FASCE, Corey 20521 A 6/19/06 4 x x x x Onaje Onaje x x x x B

FLORYAN, Ryan 25810 M 7/3/06 4 X x x x Onaje Onaje School x x B

GINESE, Anthony 17229 A 5/22/06 4 x x x x Onaje Anna x x x B

GORTON, Tyrell 24399 A 6/26/06 4 x x x x Onaje Anna x x 7/27/06 x B

HARRISON, Ronald 22216 A 6/26/06 4 x x x x Onaje Onaje school x x BD

HINES, Raheem 15198 A 6/26/06 4 x x x x Onaje Sylvia school x x B

JOHNSON, Darrell 8740 A 4/24/06 4 x x x x Onaje Runion x x x 8/11/06 x B

KIERNAN, William 25698 A 6/19/06 4 x x x x Moe Anna School x x x x B