evolution of network implementation · spatialnet accelerated understanding of ndd’s provided by...
TRANSCRIPT
-
This document sets out NBN Co’s proposals in respect of certain aspects of the National Broadband Network. The contents of this document represent NBN Co’s current position on the subject matter of this document. The contents of this document should not be relied upon by our stakeholders (or any other persons) as representing NBN Co’s final position on the subject matter of this document, except where stated otherwise. NBN Co’s position on the subject matter of this document may also be impacted by legislative and regulatory developments in respect of the National Broadband Network. All prices shown in this document are exclusive of GST.
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
Evolution of Network Implementation Finance Project Fox
Planning & Design September 2013 to June 2014
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
Plan to Evolve Network Implementation
The combination of the changes to the Network Architecture, with the Telstra involvement in Duct proving and remediation specified in Step Change, and the direct management of Tier 2 Contractors with the Render application; all supported with the new technology introduction of Small Form Factor Multi‐ports, smaller diameter cables and the next generation Fibre Distribution Hubs will allow the cost forecast in the NBN Co Corporate Plan to not only be met, but even lower cost levels achieved!
Architecture 2.1 + Step Change + Render
New Technologies
Corporate Plan ($ & time)
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
Architecture Type 2.1 Key Changes
• Fibre Demand Point allocation changed to: • 1.5 fibres per Single Dwelling Unit • 1.5 fibres per Commercial Premises • 1.25 fibres per Multi Premises Site
• Increase FDH utilisation to ~400 GNAF.
• Reduction of feeder fibre allocation per FDH in DFN to 24 Fibres, 2 Ribbons. • Provision of point to point fibre allocation per FDH in DFN of 12 Fibres, 1 Ribbon • Removal of dual direction feed of DFN to each FDH, removal of patching restoration, change to 432 fibre cable.
• Increase in number of FDHs to be served via a spur to 8 (although DFN ring configuration will remain the preferred configuration).
• Fibre Demand Point allocation changed to: • 1.5 fibres per Single Dwelling Unit • 1.5 fibres per Commercial Premises • 1.25 fibres per Multi Premises Site
• Increase FDH utilisation to ~400 GNAF.
• Reduction of feeder fibre allocation per FDH in DFN to 24 Fibres, 2 Ribbons. • Provision of point to point fibre allocation per FDH in DFN of 12 Fibres, 1 Ribbon • Removal of dual direction feed of DFN to each FDH, removal of patching restoration, change to 432 fibre cable.
• Increase in number of FDHs to be served via a spur to 8 (although DFN ring configuration will remain the preferred configuration).
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013 Page 4 14-Sep-14
Summary of Architecture 2.1 Modelling Results
Average savings of $315 achieved per Premises broken down by network component can be shown as:
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013 Page 5 14-Sep-14
Benefits: Reduce repetitive FIR walkouts by enforcing “Right First Time” approach Reduce duration from 80+ days to maximum of 17 days
Design Field Support Services will conduct T‐FIRs and audit E‐FIR and AVRs
3
Benefits: SDP improve capability in using SpatialNet Accelerated understanding of NDD’s provided by P&D
Regional Network Designer to support SDP’s in completing DDD’s
4
Benefits: Faster issuance of Certificate of Accuracy Better use of Arial Design Expertise Consistent workflow to Aerial Design House Removes requirement to constantly retrain SDP engaged ADH
National Arial Design within NBN Co control to provide consistency of Arial Design with direct Utility engagement
6 Eliminate Handover Points by streamlining the E2E NDD to DDD design process
Benefits: Reduction of time spent on review and understanding Reduction of multiple quality checks such as SpatialNet NCR Reduced chance of error at handover Improved Quality
2
Benefits: Reduction of rework on BoQ Accelerated throughput of DDD to construction
Providing Regional Design Manager with authority to conduct in field design variations
5
Benefits: NBN Co being accountable will drive the delivery of DDDs Better training of resources at NBN Co in network design More efficient utilisation of existing NBN Co design resources
Move Accountability for DDD from SDPs to NBN Co Regional Design Teams
1
Field Support Services
NBN Co DDD Support Capabilities
VIC/TAS WA/SA NT QLD
NSW/ACT
Network Design
Construction Support
Field Support Services
Service Stream
Transfield
Visio
nstream
Synthe
o
Silcar
Other
Gate 1 Gate2
Gate3
NDD DDD
More than 10 Handover Points
Eliminated Handover Points within NBN Co with SDP
88+ Days
43+ Days
Service Delivery Partners
E‐FIR
AVR
T‐FIR
Service Delivery Partners
E‐FIR
AVR
T‐FIR
Design Field Support Services Audit Execute
Service Delivery Partners
Service Delivery Partners
Regional Network Designers
NBN Co Regional Manager
NNR* NNR*
Multip
ort
Multip
ort
Ducts
Ducts
Pits
Pits
Remed
iatio
n Re
med
iatio
n
Execute IFDV
In‐Field Design Variation
Service Delivery Partners
Telstra
NBN Co Design Cost Optimisation
Aerial Design House
Engage
Design
Arial Design Expert
Arial Design Expert
ADH
NBN Co Arial Design Experts
Replace Arial with Underground
* NNR - Notification Not Required
6 key improvements proposed to optimise the E2E design process
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
Aerial Included Step Change Process
Network Design
Document
Field Inspection Report
Detailed Design
Document
Design & Civil Construction, Augment and New Build
(underground)
Remediation Works
Build, Splice & Test Fibre (aerial & underground)
Remediation Handover
Handover to Network Operations
10 days 17 days 5 days 3 months
• Assess fitness (rod and rope activities) • Identify alternatives to maximise use • Identify required remediation works • Perform targeted Address walkout
Design Optimisation
Serv
ice
Del
iver
y Pa
rtne
r
NB
N C
o
Tels
tra
(a
s C
ontr
acto
r)
Confirmed Order Response and comment
Provisional Order Response and comment
3 month Default Remediation Period
3 month Generic Completion Time
Tels
tra
(u
nder
DA)
Ae
rial A
SP
Field Survey & Prelim Design
Design Optimisation
Design Finalisation, Approval and Make Ready Works
3 month Generic Completion Time
3 months
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
10
13
6
7
3
1
20
20
16
20
29
21
18
20
20
40
20
10
15
10
11
8
4
5
12
9
23
14
1
1
10
11
5
42
17
14
9
14
20
11
16
13
3
24
4
3
3
18
13
15
29
10
0
0
0
0
0
2GOS‐08
4NDG‐05
2CBT‐01
4BDB‐04
4KLG‐08
4BDB‐03
4AAR‐01
3MLT‐10
Target(To‐Be)
As‐IsBaseline
Today: 25th Nov
Step Change: 7 out of 8 FSAMs have delivered net process time savings between 52-72 days (vs. 71 target)
Delay
FIR Phase
DDD Phase
CN/CICA Phase
Forecast
20
20
16
20
29
21
18
20
23
20
40
10
11
8
9
23
14
1
1
10
11
17
5
42
14
20
11
16
13
3
24
4
3
3
18
13
10
15
29
10
0
0
0
0
0
2GOS‐08
4NDG‐05
2CBT‐01
4BDB‐04
4KLG‐08
4BDB‐03
4AAR‐01
3MLT‐10
Proven cycletime
Target (To‐Be)
As‐Is Baseline
Target Duration
Total elapsed time Net process time
Ready for CICA
Ready for CICA
Ready for CICA
Ready for CICA*
Ready for CICA
Ready for CICA
Ready for CICA
Ready for CICA*
Ready for CICA
Ready for CICA* (Excl. Utility certified Aerial Design)
• Average CICA duration below 15days, as designs were reported “Ready for Issue” without LAANs
• Extended DDD duration due to resource availability and skill gaps.
• Net FIR duration aligns with target duration of 20 days
Ready for CICA
Ready for CICA
-71 -71
-52 -52
-64 -64
-69 -69
-61 -61
-57 -57
-72 -72
Ready for CICA
Ready for CICA
-52 -52
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
3MLT-10 Deployment Trial Background
8
The Melton 10 (3MLT‐10) Deployment Trial was initiated by NBN Co to create an internal baseline/benchmark for programme, productivity and cost performance utilising:
1. The Render deployment management system;
2. Innovative specified equipment;
3. Innovative build methods and work practices;
4. Project governance initiatives; and
5. Build Drop installation during LN/DN build.
Telstra remediation works commenced in January 2014. NBN Co engaged Australian Broadband Company, Celemetrix, Comms Connect and Linktech directly to carry out the works with a uniform Schedule of rates. Specified equipment was free issued by NBN Co to the Contractors.
3MLT‐10 is a large residential FSAM with 2484 GNAF’s (2459 SDU, 25 MDU). It contains a mixture of old and new infrastructure and is a rocky area. There is also a relatively large number of 5 and 1 acre lots and standard residential blocks within the FSAM.
The 3MLT‐10 deployment was the first to utilise a Telstra FIR / NBN Co design. A separate Post Implementation analysis for Design is currently being completed by NBN Co’s Design group.
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
A
B
C
Completed FSAM's All FSAM's 3MLT-10
LN/DN Cost per GNAF Comparison - 3BRA
265 days
344 days
104 days
Completed FSAM's All FSAM's 3MLT-10
'Build Commenced to RFS' Comparison - 3BRA
3MLT-10 Programme and Cost per GNAF Results
3MLT‐10 was completed:
- 61% faster than FSAMs completed in 3BRA to date (161 business days faster)
- 70% faster that all FSAMs commenced in 3BRA to date (240 business days faster)
Programme
3MLT‐10 was completed:
- 50% cheaper than FSAMs completed in 3BRA to date
- 43% cheaper than all FSAMs commenced in 3BRA to date
Cost per GNAF
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
3MLT-10 Build Timeline compared to 3BRA FSAMs to date
This chart includes the ‘Build Commenced to RFS’ programme for all FSAMs commenced to date in Ballarat 2 CSA (3BRA). Dark green are RFS FSAMs and light green are Build Commenced FSAMs. 3MLT‐10 is RFS and is yellow. FSAMs are sorted by Build Commenced date.
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
Small Footprint Multiports (SFM)
• Underground use only • Directly replaces legacy larger
MPT device • Can be used in smaller pits • Minimises Remediation • Available in 4 port, 8 port or 12
port configurations • Still has 12F tether with HMFOC
connector.
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
Smaller Diameter Cables - Overview
05 Sept 13 | Rev 1.1 UNCLASSIFIED 12
Benefits
Assumptions • No change in equipment cost – reinforced by early discussions with vendors • No change in equipment technical standards for cable performance • Local cable production change‐over costs would be absorbed by suppliers • Existing stock of cable would be deployed (no long term supply holding impact)
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
Smaller Diameter Cables - Project Scope
• Smaller Diameter Cables project is part of Passive Network Release 4 (PNR4)
• Based on availability, the following selection of cables will be introduced as part of PNR4:
dd MMM yy | Rev 0.1 UNCLASSIFIED 13
SUPPLIER FIBRE COUNT
FILLER CURRENT OUTER DIAMTER (mm)
REDUCED DIAMETER (mm)
REDUCTION % USAGE PER FSAM BUILD *
AVAILABILITY FOR NBN Co VALIDATION
Corning 72 Gel free 12.7 12.0 5.5 % 18.6% August 2013
Corning 288 (V1)
Gel 23.7 21.7 8.4 % 5.5 % August 2013
Prysmian 144 (V1)
Gel 17.1 14.1 17.5% 48.4 % August 2013
Prysmian
288 Gel 23.7 21.7 8.4 % 5.5 % August 2013
Prysmian
576 Gel 26.7 23.9 10.5 % 27.5 % August 2013
* Percentages are shown per cable type rather than discriminating per supplier
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
Next Generation Fibre Distribution Hub
Version 8 19 June 2013 Page 14
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
Details of the Major Projects
•Architecture 2.1 • Step Change •Melton Project & Render •New Technology Introduction
• Small Form Factor Multiport • Smaller Diameter Cables • Next Generation FDH
•Architecture 2.1 • Step Change •Melton Project & Render •New Technology Introduction
• Small Form Factor Multiport • Smaller Diameter Cables • Next Generation FDH
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
Why have we chosen Type 2.1 Architecture?
Two main reasons: • To Reduce cost • To Reduce the time taken to build the network.
Savings are made in:
• Materials used • Civil works
• Pit Upgrades • Duct Augmentation • Duct Build.
Redesigns will: • Reduce the cost of the build • Get designs built faster, connecting more premises by target dates
Architecture 2.1
New
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
Architecture Type 2.1 Key Changes
• Allocated Fibres at each Demand Point reduced to: o 1.5 fibres per Single Dwelling Unit (SDU) - Type 2 was 3 fibres o 1.5 fibres per Commercial Premises - Type 2 was 2 fibres o 1.25 fibres per Multi Premises Site (MPS) - Type 2 was 1.5 fibres
• Connected Fibres at each Demand Point has not changed: o 1 fibre per Single Dwelling Unit (SDU) - Type 2 was 1 fibre o 1 fibre per Commercial Premises - Type 2 was 1 fibre o 1 fibre per Multi Premises Site (MPS) - Type 2 was 1 fibre
• Double the utilisation of each Fibre Distribution Hub (FDH) to approximately 400 addresses
• Reduce feeder fibre allocation per FDH to 24 fibres (2 ribbons)
• Reduce default Distribution feeder cable size from 576 fibre to 432 fibre
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
Architecture 2.1 Benefits
Approved for implementation: • Reduction in the fibres allocated per premises at the Multiport • Reduction of DSS fibres allocated per FDH • Relaxation of the DSS protect path rules • Slight reduction of the Mandrel size • Introduction of Small Footprint Multiports (SFM)
Reduction in fibres means: • Smaller cables, so they are more likely to fit into existing ducts • Fewer FDH cabinets, so better chances of finding good sites • Fewer splices, so they are more easily placed into existing pits or manholes • Still have plenty of capacity for growth (Typically four fibres spare in each Multiport tether cable)
Mandrel size reduction is closer aligned to the real world and reduces augmentation.
Small Footprint Multiports fit into most existing pits.
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
Fibre Structure—Underground Type 2 The configuration for underground local fibre is a ‘Star’ local access joint used to provide the multiport tethers from a central pit, feeding pits located at the property boundary containing multiport terminals utilised to provide the same ‘plug and play’ connections.
Local Fibre Allocation
19
One Dwelling Unit Group of 24 Lots One Dwelling Unit Group of
12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1
12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1
Splitters are only patched to
addresses when required. Pass-
through connections
provide point to point connectivity
2 fibres allocated per
address
1 ribbon (12 fibres) allocated to each multiport
2 2
2 2
4 fibres allocated per NAP for addresses,
8 spare
12
Distribution fibre to next
FDH
Distribution fibre to FAN
Underground Configuration, ducts down one side of the street, cross street bores for each dwelling pair.
P100 conduit used for Local Cables and Distribution Cable
P50 conduit used for cross street
drops
Star Joint splices 10 multiport
tethers to Local Fibre Cable ribbons
DJL LJL
FDH
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
Fibre Distribution Area Structure— Underground 2 Local Fibre Design – approximately 200 Premises
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
mmmm
19003901002390
Street lengthHorizontal at premisesVertical at premises
IntersectionsTotal
mmmPremise length = 39
Road Width 14m + 2x3m verge = 20Premise width = 19
Local Fibre
Drop Fibre
PitsStreet
39 m
190 m
1 42 53 6 87 9 10
190 m
19 m
FDH
20 m
Local Fibre ‐ undergroundDistribution Fibre ‐ underground
20
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
Fibre Structure—Underground Type 2.1 The configuration for underground local fibre is a ‘Star’ local access joint used to provide the multiport tethers from a central pit, feeding pits located at the property boundary containing multiport terminals utilised to provide the same ‘plug and play’ connections.
Local Fibre Allocation
21
One Dwelling Unit Group of 24 Lots One Dwelling Unit Group of
12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1
12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1
Splitters are only patched to
addresses when required. Pass-
through connections
provide point to point connectivity
1 fibre allocated per
address
1 ribbon (12 fibres) allocated to each multiport
1 1
1 1
8 fibres allocated per NAP for addresses,
4 spare
12
Distribution fibre to next
FDH
Distribution fibre to FAN
Underground Configuration, ducts down one side of the street, cross street bores for each dwelling pair.
P100 conduit used for Local Cables and Distribution Cable
P50 conduit used for cross street
drops
Star Joint splices 10 multiport
tethers to Local Fibre Cable ribbons
DJL LJL
FDH
1 1
1 1
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
Fibre Distribution Area Structure— Underground 2.1 Local Fibre Design ‐ approximately 400 Premises
22
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
Fibre Structure—Aerial Type 2 Local Fibre Allocation
23
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23
DJL
Multiports Installed on the required Poles
Distribution fibre to next FDH
Distribution fibre to FAN LJL
FDH
Factory installed FlexNAP on cable
span
Larger Multiport terminals can be ‘plugged’ in as additional capacity is required.
2 fibres allocated per
address
1ribbon (12 fibres) allocated to each
multiport
2 2
2 2
4 fibres allocated per NAP for addresses,
8 spare
12
Fibre Distribution Hubs (FDH) are planned for 1 fibre per address, plus associated splitter and distribution fibre. Additional pass‐through is provided for point to point services.
Splitters are only patched to addresses when required. Pass‐through connections provide point to point connectivity
FlexNAP access port – prefabricated with 4, 8 or 12 fibres per port
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
mmmm
19003901002390
Street lengthHorizontal at premisesVertical at premises
IntersectionsTotal
m m m m 6
Premise length = 39 Pole mount height =
Road Width 14m + 2x3m verge = 20 Premise width = 19
Fibre Distribution Area Structure—Aerial Type 2 Local Fibre Design – approximately 200 Premises
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
24
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
Fibre Structure—Aerial Type 2.1 Local Fibre Allocation
25
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23
DJL
Multiports Installed on the required Poles
Distribution fibre to next FDH
Distribution fibre to FAN LJL
FDH
Factory installed FlexNAP on cable
span
Larger Multiport terminals can be ‘plugged’ in as additional capacity is required.
1 fibre allocated per
address
1ribbon (12 fibres) allocated across 2
multiports
1 1
1 1
4 fibres allocated per NAP for addresses, 4 spare every second
NAP
4
Fibre Distribution Hubs (FDH) are planned for 1 fibre per address, plus associated splitter and distribution fibre. Additional pass‐through is provided for point to point services.
Splitters are only patched to addresses when required. Pass‐through connections provide point to point connectivity
8
1 1
1 1
4 4 8 8
FlexNAP access port – prefabricated with 4, 8 or 12 fibres per port
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
Fibre Distribution Area Structure—Aerial Type 2.1 Local Fibre Design – approximately 400 Premises
26
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
Fibre Serving Area Module Cables
27
16 Splitter Tubes (Both Directions) 4 Transit Tubes 432 Fibre Cable
8 Splitter Tubes (Both Directions) 2 Transit Tubes 216 Fibre Cable
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
Summary of change impact
Cells highlighted in green are values that have changed
2x ODF DSS DJL HSD FDH HSL LJL LSS AJL MSS MPT SDS
Capacity 2x576f FSAM
1x576 fibres
6xCables
1x72 fibres
576 premises
1x 576 fibres
10x cables
144f or 72f
6 or 12 MSS
12fibres
12ports
Premises Capacity 36,864 18,432 576 576 576 72 / 144 12 12
Max initial Utilisation 16% 33% 67% 67% 33% 33% 50% 83% 83% 33% 33%
Physical Size 2Racks
560mm2
0.05m3
123mm2
0.24m3
603mm2
0.06m3
230mm2
0.03m3
28mm2
0.01m3
Max premises day 1 6,016 3,008 188 188 188 40 4 4
Capacity 3x432f FSAMs
432 fibres 6xCables
72 fibres 576 premises
1x 576 fibres
10x cables
144f or 72f
6 or 12 MSS
12 fibres 12 ports
Premises Capacity 82,944 27,648 576 576 576 144 or 72 12 12
Max initial Utilisation 22% 44% 67% 67% 65% 65% 50% 83% 83% 67% 67%
Physical Size 2Racks
377mm2
0.05m3
123mm2
0.24m3
603mm2
0.06m3
230mm2
0.03m3
28mm2
0.01m3
Max premises day 1 18,048 6,016 376 376 376 80 8 8
End User
Today
Future State
100% SDU scenario
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013 Page 29 14-Sep-14
To determine the impact of reducing the fibres allocated per premises. Specifically, the impact on Duct and Pit Augmentation required. To achieve this, four areas were selected to produce designs under different fibre allocation rules and compare the theoretical build requirements based on the BoQ. Areas were selected within the following constraints: -Two adjacent FSAMs (So they could be sensibly combined) -Combined less than 5000 premises (To be able to fit into 1x FSAM) -NDDs issued within the last 6 months (To improve the input data quality) -No aerial network (Subject of a different review) -Not outliers in terms of augmentation or new build quantities
Appendix – Scope of evaluation study
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013 Page 30 14-Sep-14
Test Areas
Area FSA Type Premises Comparison type
Scenarios
Maitland NSW 2MAI
Regional town low density
4959 4889
Minimal manual intervention
Base Case (3f /SDU, 2f /CDU, 1.5f /MPS) Reduced Fibre Count (1.5f /SDU, 1.5f /CDU, 1.25f /MPS)
Victoria Park WA 6VIC
Metro area Medium density 3657
Minimal manual intervention
Base Case (3f /SDU, 2f /CDU, 1.5f /MPS) Reduced Fibre Count (1.5f /SDU, 1.5f /CDU, 1.25f /MPS)
Toowoomba Qld 4TOB
Regional town low density 3500
Optimised Design
Base Case (3f /SDU, 2f /CDU, 1.5f /MPS) Reduced Fibre Count (1.5f /SDU, 1.5f /CDU, 1.25f /MPS)
Penrith NSW 2PTH
Metro area Medium density 3500
Optimised Design
Base Case (3f /SDU, 2f /CDU, 1.5f /MPS) Reduced Fibre Count (1.5f /SDU, 1.5f /CDU, 1.25f /MPS)
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013 Page 31 14-Sep-14
Summary of Results
Cable / Duct Connection points / Pits Duct Augmentation All reduced Pit Remediation All reduced
New Duct Mixed result New Pits All reduced
New + Augment duct All reduced New + Remediated pits All reduced
DSS All reduced DJL All reduced
LSS All reduced FDH All reduced
MSS All reduced LJL All reduced
SDS Mixed result AJL All reduced
Total Cable length All reduced MPT All reduced
Total Cable volume All reduced Total connection points All reduced
Average cost saving = $315 per premises
Below is a summary of the results for the four areas comparing base case with a fibre allocation of 1.5 fibres per SDU, 1.5 fibres per commercial premises, 1.25 per MPS.
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013 Page 32 14-Sep-14
Summary of Results
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013 Page 33 14-Sep-14
Summary of Results Average savings achieved per Premises broken down by network component
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
Results per Site
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013 Page 35 14-Sep-14
2MAI – Maitland Background info
Country town north of Sydney Growing town so mixture of old and new homes 4900 premises 2130 sqm per premises 16.5 m of street per premises
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013 Page 36 14-Sep-14
2MAI – Maitland Quantity results
Base Case (Max 200m SDS)
Compromise fibre allocation
Minimum fibre allocation (Max
250m SDS)
2x FSAMs, 3f/SDU, 2f/CDU, 1.5f/MPS
1x FSAM, 1.5f/SDU, 1.5f/CDU, 1.25f/MPS
1x FSAM, 1.25f/SDU, 1.25f/CDU, 1f/MPS
Area (sqkm) 10.6 10.4 10.7Streetlength (km) 81.9 80.0 83.1SDUs/CDUs sites 3779 3799 3794MPS sites 291 282 287Total Premises 4959 4889 5035
Distribution cable length within FSAM (km) 27.5 14.9 14.5Distribution cable length Outside FSAM (km) 3 0 0Distribution cable length total (km) 30.5 14.9 14.5FDHs 27 16 16PDHs 0 0 0Local + MSS cable length (km) 264 191 161.3Multiports 1158 709 648SDS cable length (km) 337.9 328.2 318.9
Duct Augmentation (km) 25.2 17.4 15.6New Duct (km) 6.1 5 6.3Pit Remediation (Qty) 686 496 486New Pits (Qty) 19 11 7
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013 Page 37 14-Sep-14
2MAI – Maitland Unit Cost results
Base Case (Max 200m SDS)
Compromise fibre allocation
Minimum fibre allocation (Max
250m SDS)
2x FSAMs, 3f/SDU, 2f/CDU, 1.5f/MPS
1x FSAM, 1.5f/SDU, 1.5f/CDU, 1.25f/MPS
1x FSAM, 1.25f/SDU, 1.25f/CDU, 1f/MPS
Distribution cable 197$ $ 98 $ 92 FDHs 125$ $ 75 $ 73
‐$ $ ‐ $ ‐ Local + MSS cable 426$ $ 313 $ 256 Multiports 68$ $ 42 $ 37 SDS cable 477$ $ 470 $ 443
‐$ $ ‐ $ ‐ Duct Augmentation 422$ $ 295 $ 257 New Duct 123$ $ 102 $ 125 Pit Remediation ‐$ $ ‐ $ ‐ New Pits 7$ $ 4 $ 3
‐$ $ ‐ $ ‐ Total 1,844$ 1,399$ 1,287$ Saving relative to base case 24% 30%
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013 Page 38 14-Sep-14
6VIC – Victoria Park Background info
Southern part of Perth Mixture of old and new homes Some industrial 3657 premises 1100 sqm per premises 13.1 m of street per premises
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013 Page 39 14-Sep-14
6VIC – Victoria Park Quantity results
Base Case (Max 200m SDS)
Compromise fibre allocation
Minimum fibre allocation (Max
250m SDS)
2x FSAMs, 3f/SDU, 2f/CDU, 1.5f/MPS
1x FSAM, 1.5f/SDU, 1.5f/CDU, 1.25f/MPS
1x FSAM, 1.25f/SDU, 1.25f/CDU, 1f/MPS
Area (sqkm) 4.0 4.0 4.0Streetlength (km) 47.9 47.9 47.9SDUs/CDUs sites 1678 1678 1678MPS sites 391 391 391Total Premises 3657 3657 3657
Distribution cable length within FSAM (km) 12.6 9.7 7.5Distribution cable length Outside FSAM (km) 12 7 7Distribution cable length total (km) 24.6 16.7 14.5FDHs 19 12 10PDHs 4 4 4Local + MSS cable length (km) 141.5 124.6 115.9Multiports 620 427 391SDS cable length (km) 130.7 153.3 155.1
Duct Augmentation (km) 6.5 7.1 5.2New Duct (km) 5.4 5.3 5.3Pit Remediation (Qty) 287 243 217New Pits (Qty) 0 0 0
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013 Page 40 14-Sep-14
6VIC – Victoria Park Unit Cost results
Base Case (Max 200m SDS)
Compromise fibre allocation
Minimum fibre allocation (Max
250m SDS)
2x FSAMs, 3f/SDU, 2f/CDU, 1.5f/MPS
1x FSAM, 1.5f/SDU, 1.5f/CDU, 1.25f/MPS
1x FSAM, 1.25f/SDU, 1.25f/CDU, 1f/MPS
Distribution cable 215$ $ 146 127$ FDHs 119$ $ 75 63$
‐$ $ ‐ ‐$ Local + MSS cable 310$ $ 273 254$ Multiports 49$ $ 34 31$ SDS cable 250$ $ 293 297$
‐$ $ ‐ ‐$ Duct Augmentation 148$ $ 161 118$ New Duct 148$ $ 145 145$ Pit Remediation ‐$ $ ‐ ‐$ New Pits ‐$ $ ‐ ‐$
‐$ ‐$ ‐$ Total 1,239$ 1,128$ 1,034$ Saving relative to base case 9% 17%
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013 Page 41 14-Sep-14
4TOB – Toowoomba Background info
Large Regional town West of Brisbane, Qld Mostly new homes 3625 premises 2519 sqm per premises 19.3 m of street per premises
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013 Page 42 14-Sep-14
4TOB – Toowoomba Quantity results
Base Case(Issued NDDs)
First RunRun 2 (Tighter MPT
packing)
2x FSAMs, 3f/SDU, 2f/CDU, 1.5f/MPS
1x FSAM, 1.5f/SDU, 1.5f/CDU, 1.25f/MPS
1x FSAM, 1.5f/SDU, 1.5f/CDU, 1.25f/MPS
Area (sqkm) 9.0 9.0 9.0Streetlength (km) 68.8 68.8 68.8SDUs/CDUs sites 2921 2877 2877MPS sites 112 121 121Total Premises 3560 3625 3625
Distribution cable length within FSAM (km) 25.42 19.6 15.3Distribution cable length Outside FSAM (km) 19 9.5 9.5Distribution cable length total (km) 44.42 29.1 24.8FDHs 24 15 13PDHs 0 1 1Local + MSS cable length (km) 196 163.3 147.2Multiports 869 534 418SDS cable length (km) 145.3 167 202.5
Duct Augmentation (km) 8.2 6.3 4.5New Duct (km) 7.5 7.4 7.6Pit Remediation (Qty) 124 119 87New Pits (Qty) 45 0 0
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013 Page 43 14-Sep-14
4TOB – Toowoomba Unit Cost results
Base Case(Issued NDDs)
First RunRun 2 (Tighter MPT
packing)
2x FSAMs, 3f/SDU, 2f/CDU, 1.5f/MPS
1x FSAM, 1.5f/SDU, 1.5f/CDU, 1.25f/MPS
1x FSAM, 1.5f/SDU, 1.5f/CDU, 1.25f/MPS
Distribution cable 399$ $ 257 $ 219 FDHs 155$ $ 95 $ 82
‐$ $ ‐ $ ‐ Local + MSS cable 440$ $ 360 $ 325 Multiports 71$ $ 43 $ 33 SDS cable 286$ $ 322 $ 391
‐$ $ ‐ $ ‐ Duct Augmentation 191$ $ 144 $ 103 New Duct 211$ $ 204 $ 210 Pit Remediation ‐$ $ ‐ $ ‐ New Pits 23$ $ ‐ $ ‐
‐$ $ ‐ $ ‐ Total 1,776$ 1,426$ 1,363$ Saving relative to base case 20% 23%
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013 Page 44 14-Sep-14
2PTH – Penrith Background info
Metro area in western Sydney Mostly new homes 4689 premises 1098 sqm per premises 13.6 m of street per premises
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013 Page 45 14-Sep-14
2PTH – Penrith Quantity results
Base Case(Issued NDDs)
First Run (Min. Manual work)
Second Run (FDH placement optimised)
2x FSAMs, 3f/SDU, 2f/CDU, 1.5f/MPS
1x FSAM, 1.5f/SDU, 1.5f/CDU, 1.25f/MPS
1x FSAM, 1.5f/SDU, 1.5f/CDU, 1.25f/MPS
Area (sqkm) 5.2 5.2 5.2Streetlength (km) 63.6 63.6 63.6SDUs/CDUs sites 4228 4228 4228MPS sites 120 120 120Total Premises 4689 4689 4689
Distribution cable length within FSAM (km) 15.9 18.4 10.5Distribution cable length Outside FSAM (km) 8 4 4Distribution cable length total (km) 23.9 22.4 14.5FDHs 29 15 15PDHs 0 1 1Local + MSS cable length (km) 237.7 171.1 167.5Multiports 1163 607 607SDS cable length (km) 202.3 276.5 276.5
Duct Augmentation (km) 8 5.6 4.9New Duct (km) 9.4 7.04 6.64Pit Remediation (Qty) 296 137 107New Pits (Qty) 138 136 135
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013 Page 46 14-Sep-14
2PTH – Penrith Unit Cost results
Base Case(Issued NDDs)
First Run (Min. Manual work)
Second Run (FDH placement optimised)
2x FSAMs, 3f/SDU, 2f/CDU, 1.5f/MPS
1x FSAM, 1.5f/SDU, 1.5f/CDU, 1.25f/MPS
1x FSAM, 1.5f/SDU, 1.5f/CDU, 1.25f/MPS
Distribution cable 163$ $ 153 $ 99 FDHs 142$ $ 74 $ 74
‐$ $ ‐ $ ‐ Local + MSS cable 406$ $ 292 $ 286 Multiports 72$ $ 38 $ 38 SDS cable 302$ $ 413 $ 413
‐$ $ ‐ $ ‐ Duct Augmentation 142$ $ 99 $ 87 New Duct 200$ $ 150 $ 142 Pit Remediation ‐$ $ ‐ $ ‐ New Pits 53$ $ 52 $ 52
‐$ $ ‐ $ ‐ Total 1,480$ 1,270$ 1,189$ Saving relative to base case 14% 20%
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
Fibre Design Changes: Update 1. Step Change Project 2. Backlog Progress
Planning & Design July, 2013
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013 Page 48 14-Sep-14
Executive Summary – Step Change Up till now...
The Issues...
What are we proposing... So that in the future...
Planning and Design completes NDDs, releases these to Construction Detailed Design, and then these are released to Service Delivery Partners to complete walkout activities and then develop Detailed Designs, co‐ordinated by Construction Regional Project Directors.
• Bottlenecks will reduce, throughput will increase and the SDP’s can focus on building the Network.
• From issuing a CI to current Gate 1, the expected cycle times will go from the current average of 86 days to
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013 Page 49 14-Sep-14
Telstra FIR & DD (as per Step Change) only goes part way to address the 2014 850k GNAF target
Page 49
June July August September October November December
• Step change improvements deliver only part of 2014 850k GNAFs target • In addition to implementing step change recommendations, improvement / process changes must also address current
inefficiencies in “NDD to DDD delivery model”. • A number of different delivery models for detailed design during transition, each with different accountabilities across the
“NDD to DDD process”. Much greater coordination across functional areas needed to achieve the corporate targets. • Staged rollout of these models will add additional complexity that could be more effectively managed with Single NBN Co
functional Accountability for all Design work.
Contrib
ution to 1M GNAF
Target
80 FSAMS
Brownfields BAU 445 CI’s Issued
Step Change ∆
NT Model
Silcar ∆
Greenfields BAU
Vision Stream ∆
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013 Page 50 14-Sep-14
Benefits: Reduce repetitive FIR walkouts by enforcing “Right First Time” approach Reduce duration from 80+ days to maximum of 17 days
Design Field Support Services will conduct T‐FIRs and audit E‐FIR and AVRs
3
Benefits: SDP improve capability in using SpatialNet Accelerated understanding of NDD’s provided by P&D
Regional Network Designer to support SDP’s in completing DDD’s
4
Benefits: Faster issuance of Certificate of Accuracy Better use of Arial Design Expertise Consistent workflow to Aerial Design House Removes requirement to constantly retrain SDP engaged ADH
National Arial Design within NBN Co control to provide consistency of Arial Design with direct Utility engagement
6 Eliminate Handover Points by streamlining the E2E NDD to DDD design process
Benefits: Reduction of time spent on review and understanding Reduction of multiple quality checks such as SpatialNet NCR Reduced chance of error at handover Improved Quality
2
Benefits: Reduction of rework on BoQ Accelerated throughput of DDD to construction
Providing Regional Design Manager with authority to conduct in field design variations
5
Benefits: NBN Co being accountable will drive the delivery of DDDs Better training of resources at NBN Co in network design More efficient utilisation of existing NBN Co design resources
Move Accountability for DDD from SDPs to NBN Co Regional Design Teams
1
Field Support Services
NBN Co DDD Support Capabilities
VIC/TAS WA/SA NT QLD
NSW/ACT
Network Design
Construction Support
Field Support Services
Service Stream
Transfield
Visio
nstream
Synthe
o
Silcar
Other
Gate 1 Gate2
Gate3
NDD DDD
More than 10 Handover Points
Eliminated Handover Points within NBN Co with SDP
88+ Days
43+ Days
Service Delivery Partners
E‐FIR
AVR
T‐FIR
Service Delivery Partners
E‐FIR
AVR
T‐FIR
Design Field Support Services Audit Execute
Service Delivery Partners
Service Delivery Partners
Regional Network Designers
NBN Co Regional Manager
NNR* NNR*
Multip
ort
Multip
ort
Ducts
Ducts
Pits
Pits
Remed
iatio
n Re
med
iatio
n
Execute IFDV
In‐Field Design Variation
Service Delivery Partners
Telstra
NBN Co Design Cost Optimisation
Aerial Design House
Engage
Design
Arial Design Expert
Arial Design Expert
ADH
NBN Co Arial Design Experts
Replace Arial with Underground
* NNR - Notification Not Required
6 key improvements proposed to optimise the E2E design process
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
Reminder: Guiding principles will help limit number of variations, ensure constructability and efficiency
Page 51
• 1 master E2E process will be defined • Various contract models will have separate processes (if required), but they will be
based on the master process
• New process will have to ensure (via accountabilities, KPIs, feedback loops, etc.) - Schedule of FSAM designs to be aligned to POW, including prioritised
programme of FSAMs over next 12 months (planned to be 18 months) - Deliverables meet all reasonable and agreed technical expectations of
Construction. The new process will not aspire to over-deliver / over-engineer any outputs
- Clear handover accountability from Design to Construction - Efficient design correction mechanisms and feedback loops in case of design
errors (from the constructability point of view)
• Clear end-to-end FSAM ownership along the entire design process • Process cycle time targets will be based on the 80-20% rule
- Target durations will be realistic to meet in case of “business as usual” situations and exceptions
• (When we set target durations) we assume that the all required contracts/relationships will be in place to facilitate To-Be
- E.g. we won’t lose significant time in Electrical Design phase due to lack of proper cooperation with Utilities
Limit # of Process
Variations
Ensure Constructability
Ensure Efficiency
New
New
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
Fast Track CI Process results in significant Delivery Partner delays and design rework
Flowthrough process supports multiple contract models, improves design quality and reduces rework Aerial MRW CI for Construction Activities
Remediation Commencement Notice DDD FIR NDD Prerequisite
Aerial MRW CI for Construction Activities
Remediation Commencement Notice DDD FIR NDD Prerequisite
Appr. 20 Bus. Days 10 Bus. Days 20 Bus. Days 5 Bus. Days 15 Bus. Days 60 Bus. Days
5 Bus. Days 12 Bus. Days 40 Bus. Days 42 Bus. Days 29 Bus. Days 60 Bus. Days
Review DDD Telstra Response - Part A - Part B
Review
Targeted Address Walkout (by exception)
Pole Survey
NDD
FIR Draft (submit FDA by FDA)
Remediation Handover
Telstra LAANs
CI for Field Walkout
Commencement Notice
Define FSAM Boundaries
Address Walkout (MPS)
Create Network Design
Planning Assessment (incl. FDH location)
FIR
BoQ
NBN LAAN
Construction Documentation
Electrical Design
Gate 1Review DDD Telstra Response - Part A - Part B
Gate 3 Review
FIR
NDD
Address Walkout
Remediation Handover
Telstra LAANs
CI for Field Walkout
Commencement Notice
Define FSAM Boundaries
Create Network Design FIR
BoQ
NBN LAAN
Construction Documentation
Electrical Design
Planning Assessment
Gate 2 Review
DDD
Rework
NBN DP Telstra
ASP Tier 2/3
Key Process Change
Pain Point
Pole Survey
CICA
CICA
To-Be design process expected to deliver (CICA) FSAMs in 98 days. Current pain points have been addressed
Electrical Design Documentation
Aerial MRW
Target duration 98 calendar daysTarget duration 98 calendar days
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
Seven strategic focus areas to elaborate the most critical elements of the new process
Version 8 Page 53
Strategic focus areas Required details / key questions Proposed
representatives
Define P&D-C handover
Re-define support requirements
Define handling of in-field variations /
issues
Re-define KPIs
Re-define accountabilities
• P&D and C have to define a mechanism ensuring that designs meet required quality levels and include details required for constructability.
• Checks to focus on comprehensiveness /quality of high impact parts
• New design process and org setup will require different level of support from the corporate functions (HR, OHS&E, stakeholder management). Required forms and volume of support to be defined
• P&D and C to define how variations will be handled efficiently • Issues will require systematic tracking to get fixed within reasonable
time and initiate continuous improvement measures within P&D
• KPIs will track quality (constructability),cycle times and costs • KPIs will have to reflect the new org and accountability structure • KPIs will have to be aligned with the overall E2E reporting concept
g p
• Design and P&D-C handover RACI has to be aligned with new org setup and new design process(es)
• Level of accountability has to be defined concretely • Change control processes and accountabilities to be defined
pp
• P&D: Peter Zordan • C: Adam Hatch • PIP, P&D/C, Quality to
support
• P&D: Peter Zordan • PIP MvB team
• P&D: Peter Zordan • PIP P&D, C and E2E
reporting teams
y
• P&D: Peter Zordan • C: Adam Hatch,
Caroline Heinze • PIP, P&D/C, Quality
pp
• P&D: Peter Zordan • C: Adam Hatch • PIP, P&D/C, Quality to
support
Define contract model selection mechanism
• P&D and C have to define a mechanism how they will agree on the construction model to be applied for the different FSAMs based on contractor capabilities, workload, etc. pp
• P&D: Peter Zordan • C: Adam Hatch • PIP, P&D/C, Quality to
support
Resourcing • Updated resourcing requirements for new processes and approach to
be defined
• P&D: Peter Zordan • PIP, P&D/C, Quality to
support
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
Current “NDD to CICA” process suffers from several Pain Points
Version # Page 54
Delivery Partner
Construction
Business Operations
Planning & Design – Fibre Access Designer
DA Document Administrator PN Designer Passive Network (Regional) EU Design Electrical Utility
COA Cost Optimisation Analyst
PRM Production Regional Manager
CA Contract Administrator CM Contract Manager
PM Project Manager
RS Project Regional Scheduler LASA LASA
Land Access & Stat. Approvals Officer
Plan Design Accept Design Contract Instruction PDS Program Field
Inspections Design
Review G1 Detailed Design V1 DD V1 Review
TLS Duct Reservation/Optimisation
Detailed Design V2 DD V2 Review
TLS Duct Reservation/Optimisation
Commence‐ment Notice CICA
DA Register NDD
EU
Calculate Contract Sum‐FSAM
Submit CSPO Estimates – Issue CI Pack to
Contract Commercial
Review & Approve CSPO
Create CI Pack
Release CI Pack to SDP
Receive CI Pack
Review CI Pack
Provide Feedback to NBN Co
Create PDS Program
PDS Review by PM
Upload and Update PDS
Submission (P6)
Initiate Field Inspection
Inspect GNAF (Output: AVR)
Inspect Electrical
Inspect Pit&Pipe, Poles & Ducts
(Output: Telstra FIR)
Submit to Construction (Sharepoint)
Prepare PAAR
Update FACT Schedule
Issue Design Review Documentation (PAAR,
FIR, E‐FIR, AVR)
Review PAR, AVR, Telstra FIR
Review E‐FIR
Review & Approve Service
Program
Gate1 PAAR Review Complete
Review Contract Sum
Issue Transmittal Summary to SDP
Receive Design Docs from SDP (DDD Package, Approvals, BoQ, BoM, Construction Program)
Review Handover Date and Augmentation
Requirement
Review Electrical Design
Review DDD
Review LAAN’s LIF, Statutory Applications
Issue Feedback Electrical Design
Issue Feedback DDD, LAAN, LIF, Statutory
Apps
Issue Review Documentation
Review Contract Sum
Issue Feedback on Contract Sum
Issue Feedback on Contract Sum
High Level Review of DDD Submit to DDD to Telstra
Telstra confirm duct reservations
(Part A)
Telstra Review DDD for optimisation
(Part B)
Update Telstra LAAN Commencement
Notice
Assess Telstra Remediation
Commencement
Receive updated DDD from SDP
Review/Issue Construction Program
File
Review of DDD V2 Submit to DDD to Telstra
Telstra confirm duct reservations
(Part A)
Submit Access Agreement Schedule
Review LAAN’s LIF, Statutory Applications
Review Issue Feedback
Electrical Design
Review/Issue Feedback DDD, LAAN, LIF, Statutory Apps
Issue Review Documentation
Review Contract Sum
Issue Feedback on Contract Sum
Notify Design Gate Completion
Update FACT Schedule
Notify Electrical Design Gate Completion
PN
Review ND‐Passive Network
Review ND‐Electrical
PRM
Accept ND‐ Regional
COA
PN
COA
CA
PMO
Review & Refine Fibre Serving Area
Define FSAM Boundary
Request & Update Telstra Duct Information
Perform Address Processing
Update FSA / FSAM Boundary
Create and Optimise Network Design
Perform Post FOND Design Remediation
Perform Network Design Quality
Review
Import Network Design & Extract Duct Reservation
Rework Network Design
Create NDD
Release NDD to Telstra
Process Telstra Response Feedback
Release NDD to Construction
Modify Detailed Design
Validate Address & Cable Paths
Reconnect Fibre Cables
Perform DSS / TSS Review
Perform Design Validation
Prepare DDD for Submission
Validate Element Assoc. &
Optimisation
Assess & Resolve Design Non‐Conformities
Modify Detailed Design
Validate Address & Cable Paths
Reconnect Fibre Cables
Perform DSS / TSS Review
Perform Design Validation
Prepare DDD for Submission
Validate Element Assoc. &
Optimisation
Assess & Resolve Design Non‐Conformities
Prepare Contract Instruction Support
Pack
CM
CA
DA
PN
EU
PRM
PN
COA
PN
PN
RS DA
PM PM
PM
EU
PN
LASA LASA
EU
PN
DA
COA
PN
DA
PN
PM
PN
PN
DA
PN
PM
PN
RS
PN
PN
PN
PN
LASA LASA
EU
DA
COA
EU
PN
DA
Telstra Review DDD for optimisation
(Part B)
COA
Create Commencement Notice
PN
PM
Issue Commencement
Notice
Create CICA Pack
PN
PM
Issue CICA Pack to Contracts
Receive COA from SDP
Check COA against
Objections
Issue COA Feedback to SDP
PN
CA
PN PN
Prepare & Package up PO to SDP
1
Pain Points
1. Poor data quality leads to NDD inaccuracies and downstream rework 6. Design guidelines and rules are constantly changing so DPs struggle to benefit from experience based efficiency
2. Utility providers are not engaging with DPs for aerial designs, resulting in delays and changes to underground 7. Construction drawings frequently don't match BOQ/BOM
3. FIR is not completed on time or to required quality 8. NBN designers spent most of their time solving ad‐hoc problems, not completing design reviews
4. Relaxed gate standards encourage DPs to continue with bad practices 9. Design optimisation is delivering results, however it causes significant re‐work
5. Constructability not sufficiently considered during DDD phase 10.
Fast tracking FSAMs and accountability gaps contribute to delays in obtaining CoA acceptance
4
2
4 4
6
3
8
10
9
7
5
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
Therefore, without changing the design process, P&D would soon become a bottleneck
Page 55
...as current process duration significantly deviates from model duration
Source: P6 milestones at 27 May 2013
0
500
1,000
1,500
01‐Jul‐12 01‐Aug‐12 01‐Sep‐12 01‐Oct‐12 01‐Nov‐12 01‐Dec‐12 01‐Jan‐13 01‐Feb‐13 01‐Mar‐13 01‐Apr‐13 01‐May‐13 01‐Jun‐13 01‐Jul‐13 01‐Aug‐13 01‐Sep‐13 01‐Oct‐13 01‐Nov‐13 01‐Dec‐13
Forecast bsaed on current GNAF Design Rate
PO for build issued FSAMS
Baseline GNAF construction commenced
At current design rate, P&D will not be able to feed Construction...
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013 Page 56 14-Sep-14
Network Design
Document
Field Inspection Reports
Detailed Design
Document
Design & Civil Construction, Augment and New Build
(underground)
Remediation Works
Build, Splice & Test Fibre (aerial & underground)
Remediation Handover
Handover to Network Operations
10 days 17 days 5 days 3 months
Design Optimisation
Con
stru
ctio
n D
eliv
ery
Part
ner
NB
N
Tels
tra
(a
s C
ontr
acto
r)
or o
ther
Des
ign
Del
iver
y Pa
rtne
r
Confirmed Order Response and comment
Provisional Order Response and comment
3 month Default Remediation Period
3 month Generic Completion Time
Tels
tra
(u
nder
DA)
Ae
rial A
SP Field Survey Field Survey
& Prelim Design
Design Optimisation
Design Finalisation, Approval and Make Ready Works
3 month Generic Completion Time
3 months
• Assess fitness (rod and rope activities) • Identify alternatives to maximise use • Identify required remediation works • Perform targeted Address walkout • Remediation Authorisations
Contract Instructions
Commencement Notice
Proposed step change process
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
Aerial Included NBN Co Design Managed Process (Half Step)
Network Design
Document
Field Inspection Report
Detailed Design
Document
Design & Civil Construction, Augment and New Build
(underground)
Remediation Works
Build, Splice & Test Fibre (aerial & underground)
Remediation Handover
Handover to Network Operations
10 days 17 days 5 days 3 months
• Assess fitness (rod and rope activities) • Identify alternatives to maximise use • Identify required remediation works • Perform targeted Address walkout
Design Optimisation
Serv
ice
Del
iver
y Pa
rtne
r
NB
N C
o
Tier
2/3
C
ontr
acto
r
Confirmed Order Response and comment
Provisional Order Response and comment
3 month Default Remediation Period
3 month Generic Completion Time
Tels
tra
(u
nder
DA)
Aeria
l ASP
Field Survey & Prelim Design
Design Optimisation
Design Finalisation, Approval and Make Ready Works
3 month Generic Completion Time
3 months
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013 Page 58 14-Sep-14
Backlog & Flow Through
FSAM Activity Pre July 2013 2013 Q3
013 Q4
2014 Q1
2014 Q2
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
2015 Q1
2015 Q2
BACKLOG
FSAMs Completed 36
FSAMs In‐Flight – Builds to complete 207
FSAMs for 850K – CICAs to be issued 116
FSAMs for 850K – Builds yet to start 116
FLOW THROUGH
New NDD Release Throughput 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135
New CICA Release Throughput 90 135 135 135 135 135 135 135
Telstra Remediation Throughput 0 90 135 135 135 135 135 135
New Build Throughput 0 0 90 135 135 135 135
New Build In‐Flight 0 90 225 270 270 270
850k GNAFS
359 FSAMs
2.2M GNAFS
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
0
2 2
8
3
5
19
3
0
2
1
4
0
5
0
1
0
1 1
0
1
0 0
3
0 0
2
1
3
2
0 0
NDD inHand
PDS CI Gate 1(FIR)
Gate 2(DDD)
TelstraCommNoticeIssued
Gate 3 CICA CoA
4 weeks ago 3 weeks ago 2 weeks ago 1 week ago
375 365
293 244 229
191 238
109
10
72
49 15
38
129
8 8 18
90 139 154 145 145
383
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
NDD inHand
PDS CI Gate 1(FIR)
Gate 2(DDD)
TelstraCommNoticeIssued
Gate 3 CICA CoA
Complete WIP Remainder
Target 850k GNAF shows 145 designs requiring CICA; No FSAMs passed CICA in the last three weeks
13 FSAMs are ready to issue CICA, however there is no DP to issue to 24 FSAMs have achieved CICA, however were not requested by construction 3Target provided on 22 July 2013
Source: P6, extract taken 25-7-2013
Data extracted: 25 July 2013
There are 1452 CICAs to be issued prior to 31 Oct 2013
No new CICAs have been issued in the last 3 weeks
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013 Page 60 14-Sep-14
Backlog of CNs to be Issued
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Monthly FSAM NDDs & CNs Issued
NIP 3.1.1 NDD(mth) Actual NDD(mth) CN Issued to Telstra
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013
Notional FOND NDD Design – per FSAM
Version # DD MMM YYYY Page 61
Dwelling
A J L
MPT
MPT
Dwelling
Dwelling
Dwelling
Dwelling
Dwelling
Dwelling
Dwelling
L J L FDH D J L
A J L
D J L
D J L
D J L
A J L
FDH
D J L
D J L
D J L
D J L
FDH
MPT
Dwelling
Dwelling
Pits Duct
17 Cables
100 Cables 650 Cables 3000 Cables
B D C E Fond Solve Order: # Zone B, D, C, E
A
Zone A: # Field optimisation for SDS
paths, LICs, and Addresses.
Zone B: # MPT location determined by
pit size and SDS cable length.
Zone C: # LJL located with FDH. # AJL location determined by
pit size and an even distribution along MSS route.
Zone D: # FDH location determined by
MPT distribution.
Zone E: # DJL location determined by
FDH placement, available P100 duct, and185m limit on DJL to FDH.
16 FDAs
FAN
-
UNCLASSIFIED | © NBN Co 2013 Page 62 14-Sep-14
NDD - DDD Design Optimisation NBN
Telstra
(Con
tractor)
5d
Prepare Notional NDD
FOND
Telstra FIR
Targeted Address Validation
15d to 20d
3d
DDD v1 Released
Telstra LAAN
CN Review and approve Underground Design Changes
Planning Assessment
TLS10.1.3
Rod & Rope
10d
Contract Instruction Issued
10d
Commencement Notice
2d
35d to 40d
TLS10.1.2 TLS10.1.1
Telstra
(DA) Part A Response
Part B Response
SpatialNet (NDD)
Address Processing
Recommended design changes Permitted design changes
Part A Response Part B Response
SpatialNet Updates
FDA 1 FDA 16
MapInfo GML Cable / Conduit CSV GNAF File with Targets
Bulk IFDV spreadsheet FIR Response spreadsheet Design change recommendations GNAF Assessment & Updates
FIR Completed
SpatialNet (DDD v1)
PDS
TLS10.1.3
Remediation
Design Complete Notification
Critical Design Issue?
3d ?? 12d to 17d
NBN P&D change review
NBN Field Services change review Telstra Design Evaluation review
Address
-
This document sets out NBN Co’s proposals in respect of certain aspects of the National Broadband Network. The contents of this document represent NBN Co’s current position on the subject matter of this document. The contents of this document should not be relied upon by our stakeholders (or any other persons) as representing NBN Co’s final position on the subject matter of this document, except where stated otherwise. NBN Co’s position on the subject matter of this document may also be impacted by legislative and regulatory developments in respect of the National Broadband Network. All prices shown in this document are exclusive of GST.
FOUO: Commercial | © NBN Co 2013
This document sets out NBN Co’s proposals in respect of certain aspects of the National Broadband Network. The contents of this document represent NBN Co’s current position on the subject matter of this document. The contents of this document should not be relied upon by our stakeholders (or any other persons) as representing NBN Co’s final position on the subject matter of this document, except where stated otherwise. NBN Co’s position on the subject matter of this document may also be impacted by legislative and regulatory developments in respect of the National Broadband Network. All prices shown in this document are exclusive of GST.
FOUO: Commercial | © NBN Co 2013
3MLT-10 Deployment Trial Post Implementation Results and Recommendations - Industry Pack
NBN Co Construction Services Group August 2014
-
FOUO: Commercial | © NBN Co 2013 FOUO: Commercial | © NBN Co 2013 64
3MLT-10 Deployment Trial Background
64
The Melton 10 (3MLT-10) Deployment Trial was initiated by NBN Co to create an internal baseline/benchmark for programme, productivity and cost performance utilising:
1. The Render deployment management system;
2. Innovative specified equipment;
3. Innovative build methods and work practices;
4. Project governance initiatives; and
5. Build Drop installation during LN/DN build.
Telstra remediation works commenced in January 2014. NBN Co engaged Australian Broadband Company, Celemetrix, Comms Connect and Linktech directly to carry out the works with a uniform Schedule of rates. Specified equipment was free issued by NBN Co to the Contractors.
3MLT-10 is a large residential FSAM with 2484 GNAF’s (2459 SDU, 25 MDU). It contains a mixture of old and new infrastructure and is a rocky area. There is also a relatively large number of 5 and 1 acre lots and standard residential blocks within the FSAM.
The 3MLT-10 deployment was the first to utilise a Telstra FIR / NBN Co design. A separate Post Implementation analysis for Design is currently being completed by NBN Co’s Design group.
-
FOUO: Commercial | © NBN Co 2013 FOUO: Commercial | © NBN Co 2013 65
3MLT-10 Scorecard for Comparison
65
Deployment data for all FSAMs ‘Ready for Service’ or ‘Build Commenced’ in the Ballarat 2 CSA (3BRA) has been used as the basis for comparison. This results in a group of 20 FSAMs for comparison.
The scorecard items below was prepared and agreed by all of the NBN Co Stakeholders prior to commencement of the trial, and was to be the basis for comparison at the end of the trial period.
-
FOUO: Commercial | © NBN Co 2013 FOUO: Commercial | © NBN Co 2013 66
A
B
C
Completed FSAM's All FSAM's 3MLT-10
LN/DN Cost per GNAF Comparison - 3BRA
265 days
344 days
104 days
Completed FSAM's All FSAM's 3MLT-10
'Build Commenced to RFS' Comparison - 3BRA
3MLT-10 Programme and Cost per GNAF Results
3MLT-10 was completed:
- 61% faster than FSAMs completed in 3BRA to date (161 business days faster)
- 70% faster that all FSAMs commenced in 3BRA to date (240 business days faster)
Programme
3MLT-10 was completed:
- 50% cheaper than FSAMs completed in 3BRA to date
- 43% cheaper than all FSAMs commenced in 3BRA to date
Cost per GNAF
-
FOUO: Commercial | © NBN Co 2013 FOUO: Commercial | © NBN Co 2013 67
3MLT-10 Build Timeline
Build drops:
Distribution Network (FDA-00) – 7 clear weeks
Telstra Remediation – 9 weeks
NBN Co Deployment – 16 weeks
Local Network – 11 clear weeks
90% SC2 threshold is forecast to be achieved 29 August (131 business days)
LN/DN:
-
FOUO: Commercial | © NBN Co 2013 FOUO: Commercial | © NBN Co 2013 68
3MLT-10 Build Timeline compared to 3BRA FSAMs to date
This chart includes the ‘Build Commenced to RFS’ programme for all FSAMs commenced to date in Ballarat 2 CSA (3BRA). Dark green are RFS FSAMs and light green are Build Commenced FSAMs. 3MLT-10 is RFS and is yellow. FSAMs are sorted by Build Commenced date.
-
FOUO: Commercial | © NBN Co 2013 FOUO: Commercial | © NBN Co 2013 69
Source: P6
3MLT-10 Productivity Results compared to Vic Averages
-
FOUO: Commercial | © NBN Co 2013 FOUO: Commercial | © NBN Co 2013 70
3MLT-10 Customer Complaints Results
Jan 14 – May 14 average complaints per premises passed
% complaints/GNAFS
0.00%
0.50%
1.00%
1.50%
2.00%
2.50%
WA TAS SA NSW VIC QLD NT ACT 3MLT10
Despite having a lower level of overheads and carrying out Build Drops in parallel with the LN/DN deployment, the 3MLT-10 team received a very low level of complaints from the Public.
-
FOUO: Commercial | © NBN Co 2013 FOUO: Commercial | © NBN Co 2013 71
3MLT-10 Scorecard at Completion
71
This 3MLT-10 Deployment Trial scorecard is included below.
Note: HSE, Cost, Quality, Stakeholder Management data is updated to 30 June, excluding average cost per drop which is February data. Build data is updated to 30 July.
-
FOUO: Commercial | © NBN Co 2013 FOUO: Commercial | © NBN Co 2013 72
3MLT-10 Render Deployment Management Results
Following a technical Proof of Concept, the Render deployment management methodology was trialled in 3MLT-10. Render was used to:
1. Automatically create the work scope, material BOQ directly from the DDD, including the asset data and construction sequence.
2. Allocate work to Contractors in advance using the work scope information created.
3. Automatically create the work schedule based on committed allocated resources.
4. Release 4 days worth of work to crews each day(top up) to ensure continuity & visibility of work.
5. Only release jobs that were ready to be done, i.e. all preceding tasks had been completed.
6. Status completed work daily then optimally reschedule the remaining work.
7. Capture as-built information at the task level on the day it was completed wherever possible, taking advantage of the detail extracted from the DDD in the task data.
8. Automatically update progress status and view scope/resource/asset/location/cost/programme data centrally, visible on Google maps.
9. Build the network as it was designed, eliminating “air gaps” and red-line mark ups.
10. Sequence and manage build drops concurrently with the LN/DN build.
The task based approach created by the Render tools took some time to become familiar to the teams after which time it was used to deploy and manage the work. There is still some work to be done on the functionality of the system however it performed well.
-
FOUO: Commercial | © NBN Co 2013 FOUO: Commercial | © NBN Co 2013 73
3MLT-10 Deployment Management Results
Reduced administration and simplify the following for NBN Co and Contractors:
Work Scope – defining scope at the task/asset/address level
Work Visibility - viewing all elements of the deployment on Google maps, from high level to task level to address level
Variation Management – measure design and in-field variations at the task/asset/resource level
Work Allocation – commit work volumes at the task level to Contractors
Progress reporting – automated, accurate and updated on a daily basis (Report 004)
Jeopardy management – manage issues at the task/asset/address/resource level
HSE & Quality management – integrated at the task/resource/asset level
Improve productivity, resource utilisation and forecast accuracy:
Schedule optimisation – automated daily schedule optimisation, accurate forecasts
Contractor productivity – ability to monitor productivity at the task/crew level
Crew utilisation – maximised productivity of resources each day
As-built management – updated as-built data accurately at the task/asset level daily
-
FOUO: Commercial | © NBN Co 2013 FOUO: Commercial | © NBN Co 2013 74
3MLT-10 Innovative Specified Equipment Results
SMALL DIAMETER CABLE
Overall indications are that SDC is 10-20% faster to deploy
Lighter and more flexible making the cable easier to handle and transport
Easy to coil (smaller layout area required) for cable directional changes during haul, greater utilisation of Telstra infrastructure
Less physical strain on crew – HSE benefit + reduction in crew number required for hauling
Significantly increased installation efficiency – 5 mins install vs. 15 minute install for traditional multiport No requirement to mount the multiport Can be used in smaller pits, reducing the need for Telstra pit
remediation which significantly reduces HSE risk associated with Asbestos Containing Material (ACM)
Quality issue with connection waterproofing is under investigation by the CTO group.
SMALL FOOTPRINT MULTIPORT
-
FOUO: Commercial | © NBN Co 2013 FOUO: Commercial | © NBN Co 2013 75
3MLT-10 Innovative Build Methods and Work Practices Results
Intelligent Optical Loss Measurement (IOLM) Testing Provided a 66% reduction in testing time Automated test result capture and upload Enabled real time defect rectification and
smoother handover when FSAM complete/less defects
Removed subjectivity regarding test results
HSE initiatives:
Safety barricading in lieu of bunting
Waste water harvesting and re-use
Distribution pipe straightener removed memory of the 100mm pipes minimising HS&E incidents
In Line Jointing:
Significantly reduces the number of splices required.
100% Asset Locating
Investment in asset locating resulted in zero asset strikes.
Non destructive potholing/Hydro Vacuum:
Ground Penetrating Radar was trialled and had mixed results impacted by the soil conditions
Use of the Sub Surface Instruments All Material Locator (AML) was an effective method of identifying buried assets
Design walkout/Constructability Review:
Joint NBN Co/Contractor constructability walkout prior to completion of the design would have eliminated many of the design variations encountered.
Purpose stocked Trailer for drops:
Engaged Kennards to trial.
Proven initial success.
-
FOUO: Commercial | © NBN Co 2013 FOUO: Commercial | © NBN Co 2013 76
3MLT-10 Project Governance Initiatives Results
Project Governance Meetings (twice a week)
Provided a forum to jointly address schedule, resourcing and jeopardy issues
Progress and earned value analysis by Contractor, CPA Report 004.
Focus on Culture and Work Environment
Established site office and warehouse and ran daily site (toolbox) meetings
Less administration and simpler processes
Focus on