ex / 41 / 15 shehnaz vs. aftab ahmad sangam...

EX / 41 / 15 SHEHNAZ Vs. AFTAB AHMAD Sangam Vihar05.01.2016

Present: ٍSh. Mandeep Kumar, ld. LAC for DH with DH.

No report has been given by the Nazir as whether notice was issued in terms of

order dated 09.11.2015.

Nazir is directed to furnish written explanation within 3 days from today.

Fresh notice of execution petition be issued to the JD on filing of PF/RC / speed

post returnable on 22.02.2016.

(Pooja Aggarwal) MM02 (Mahila Court), South

Saket Courts/N.D./05.01.2016

FIR 667/14STATE Vs. CANCELLATION Safdarjung Enclave05.01.2016

Present: None for the State.Sh. Deepak Shahu Proxy counsel for complainant.

IO SI Jai Prakash is present and has filed a reply to the protest petition.

Be awaited.



At 01:20 PMPresent: Sh. Ritendra Singh, Ld. APP for the State.

Sh. Deepak Sahau, counsel for complainant.

IO/ SI Jai Parkash is present.

Copy of the reply of IO supplied to complainant.

Detailed reply to protest petition be also filed by the previous two IOs i.e. SI

Rajnish and SI Rajesh.

Accordingly, issue notice to the said IOs for next date of hearing i.e. 10.03.2016.

To come up on 10.03.2016.



FIR 1411/15STATE Vs. MUMTAZ ANSARI Malviya Nagar05.01.2016

Present: Sh. Ritendra Singh, Ld. APP for the State.

Accused produced from JC.

Counsel for accused is not present.

Matter is at the stage of charge.

Put up for arguments on charge on 12.01.2016.



FIR 197/12STATE Vs. MAHENDER SINGH Malviya Nagar05.01.2016

Present: None for the state.

Sh. Joginder Prashad, counsel for accused Ashok and Bhawna.

Accused are stated to be on their way.

Counsel submits that quashing petition has been filed by the accused and same is

under objection at the Delhi High Court.

In view of submission, no fruitful purpose would be served by hearing the

arguments on charge today.

Accordingly, the matter is adjourned for 04.03.2016 for receiving quashing order

if any / arguments on charge.


Saket Courts/N.D./05.01.2016At 10:27 AM

At this stage both accused Ashok and Bhawana have appeared.

(Pooja Aggarwal)

MM02 (Mahila Court), South Saket Courts/N.D./05.01.2016

FIR 17/14STATE Vs. SHASHI DHARAN K Safdarjung Enclave05.01.2016

Present: None for the State.Sh. Sidharth Yadav counsel for accused with all three accused.Be awaited.




Sh. Siddharth Yadav, counsel for accused with all three accused.

No time is left for arguments as the counsel states that he require at least one hour

for advancing arguments.

Written submissions be filed on next date.

To come for arguments on charge on 26.02.2016.



FIR 128/14STATE Vs. Y P DOGRA Safdarjung Enclave05.01.2016


Sh. Sanjeev Sahai, counsel for accused.

Accused is stated to be on his way.

Insp. Ram Singh is present and submits he is not in position to admit or deny the said

document as he is not the executant of the same.

Request received from the office of DCP seeking some time on the grounds that notice

was received only on 04.01.2016.

On request some time has given.


Fresh notice be issued to concerned DCP in terms of the order dated 23.12.2015 at 02:00

PM.



At 02:56 PMAt this stage accused has appeared.



FIR 340/11STATE Vs. MOHD. RAHEEL Safdarjung Enclave05.01.2016


Sh. Ankit Aggarwal, counsel for both accused with accused Sukanta.

An application for exemption of accused Raheel filed.

Heard. Allowed only for today.

Application perused and considered.

For the reasons stated therein, the application for exemption from personal

appearance of accused Raheel is allowed for today only. Application is accordingly disposed

off.

B/W issued against the witnesses not received back yet.

Issue fresh bailable warrants against the witness PW Kushani in the sum of Rs.

5000/ with one surety of like amount and summons be also issued against the IO.

To come up on 09.02.2016 for PE.



FIR 439/13STATE Vs. NAKUL BENIWAL Ambedkar Nagar05.01.2016


Sh. Varun Kumar, counsel for accused with accused.

PW01 Kirti and PW Ashok Kumar are present.

PW01 & PW02 examined and discharged. Crossexamination is deferred on

request of ld. counsel for accused.

To come up for crossexamination of PW01 & PW02 on 19.01.2016 at 02:00 PM.



FIR 344/12State Vs. Lokesh KumarSangam Vihar05.01.2016


Sh. Anoj Kumar Singh counsel for accused with all three accused.

PW Jagdish is not present in the court. Though it is stated that he is court

complex itself.

Be awaited.




Sh. Anoj Kumar Singh counsel for accused with all three accused.

PW Sajana is present.

She is discharged unexamined as six other witnesses are to be examined in other

cases and the undersigned is also working as the Link MM to the court of Ms. Priti Parewa, Ld.

MM.

She is bound down for next date of hearing.

To come up for PE on 22.03.2016.



FIR 400/14STATE Vs. NOOR MOHD. @ NOORU Sangam Vihar05.01.2016


None for the accused.

PW Nitu and Sachin are not present despite being bound down on 03.11.2015.

It is already 11:53 AM.

Since the accused has not appeared since morning nor any application for

exemption from personal appearance has been moved on his behalf, issue NBW against the

accused Noor Mohd and notice to his surety for the NDOH.

List for appearance of accused / further proceedings on 15.03.2016.



At 04:01 PMFile taken up on request of accused as well as witnesses.Present: None for the State.

Accused Noor Mohd as well as PW Nitu and Sachin are present.

Accused submits that he was present at morning but did not hear the

matter being called out and orally requests that NBW issued against him be canceled

and surety be restored.

PW Nitu and Sachin submit that they were also present in the morning.

2

Heard. Perused.

Having regards to the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of

the reasons stated, it appears that the non appearance of the accused in the morning

was not intentional and hence NBWs issued against the accused stand cancelled.

NBWs cancelled, surety restored. Accused is warned to be careful in future.

Both PWs Nitu and Sachin are bound down for next date i.e. 15.03.2016.



FIR 1333/14STATE Vs. RAJESH KUMAR YADAV Hauz Khas05.01.2016


Accused Rajesh Kumar Yadav is present.

PW Guddi Rawat, Mukesh Kumar and Ct. Dilpreet are present.

Be awaited.



At 01:25 PMPresent : Sh. Ritendra Singh, Ld. APP for the State.

Accused is present with counsel Sh. S. K. Sharma.

PW01 has been examined and discharged. Crossexamination is deferred as it is 01:28 PM.

PW Mukesh and Ct. Dilpreet are discharged unexamined as counsel for

accused submits that he is not available after lunch.

All three witnesses are bound down for next date of hearing.

To come up on 25.01.2016

Diet money be released to witnesses as per rule.



CC / 30/1 / 15 ARUNA GAHLOT Vs. RITU GAHLOT Sangam Vihar05.01.2016

Present: None.

It is already 11:58 AM.

Put up for appearance of parties / CE on 22.02.2016.



CC / 221/1 / 14 KAILASHWATI Vs. SONU MUMAR @SONLAL Malviya Nagar05.01.2016

Present: Sh. Anil Kumar, counsel for aggrieved with aggrieved.

Ms Pooja Aggarwal proxy for respondent with respondent.

It is already 12:00 noon and pass over is requested by respondent for cross

examination of aggrieved.

To come up at 12:30 PM.


Saket Courts/N.D./05.01.2016At 03:52 PMPresent: Aggrieved in person.

Sh. Varun Pratap, ld. LAC for respondent with respondent.

CW01 crossexamined and discharged. On request and in view of submission on

08.07.2015, CE is closed.

Evidence by way of affidavit of all defence witnesses alongwith list of witnesses

be filed on next date but with advance copy to the aggrieved at least two weeks prior to the next

date of hearing.

To come up on 23.02.2016 for entire DE.



CC / 169/1 / 14 NISHA Vs. SACHIN MASIH Hauz Khas05.01.2016

Present: Aggrieved in person with Sh. Hitesh stated to be intern.

Sh. Pawan Kumar proxy for respondent with respondent.

Evidence by way of affidavit filed by aggrieved without any list of witnesses.

Copy supplied.

Since the copy of affidavit has been supplied today itself despite specific

direction to supply advance copy, renotify for entire CE on 04.02.2016.



CC / 163/1 / 15 REENA & ORS. Vs. SUNIL & ORS. Sangam Vihar05.01.2016

Present: Aggrieved in person.

Respondent no.1 in person.

Sh. Inderjeet Baisla for respondent no. 2 & 3 with respondent no. 2 & 3.

Pass over requested by aggrieved. However, even on a court query no explanation

has been furnished as to why the evidence by way of affidavit of aggrieved has not been filed

nor advance copy was supplied to the respondent.

It is already 12:09 PM and no fruitful purpose would be served by passing over

the matter.

Last and final opportunity is given to the aggrieved to lead her entire CE and file

her evidence by way of affidavit within one week with advance copy to the respondent at least 2

weeks prior to the next date.

To come up for entire CE on 02.03.2016.



CC / 156/1 / 14 REKHA RAJORA Vs. MAHABIR PRASAD DASH & ORS.Malviya Nagar05.01.2016

Present: Sh. Rajesh Pandey, proxy for aggrieved with aggrieved.

Sh. Puneet Bhati, Counsel for all respondent with respondent no. 1.

Pass over requested by aggrieved for filing her evidence by way of affidavit.

The same be filed during the course of the day with copy to respondent.

An application U/s 91 Cr.PC filed by the respondent alongwith the reply to the

application of aggrieved.

Copies supplied.

List of witnesses be also filed during the course of the day if not on record along

with the evidence by way of affidavit.

To come up for CE / arguments on 08.03.2016.



CC / 220/1 / 14 SUSHILA Vs. PRADEEP KUMAR & ORS. Malviya Nagar05.01.2016

Present: Sh. Anil Kumar, counsel for aggrieved with aggrieved.

Ms Pooja Aggarwal proxy for respondent with respondent.

It is already 12:16 PM and pass over is requested by respondent for cross

examination of aggrieved.

To come up at 12:30 PM.


Saket Courts/N.D./05.01.2016At 03:55 PMPresent: Aggrieved in person.

Sh. Varun Pratap Singh, ld. LAC for respondent with respondent.

No time is left for crossexamination of CW01.

Renotify for crossexamination on 25.01.2016.



FIR 11/13STATE Vs. BHAGAT RAM AND OTHERSSaket05.01.2016


Sh. Anjani Kumar, counsel for accused with both accused.

DW01 HC Mumtyaj Ali has been examined, crossexamined and discharged.

An application was filed by accused on 04.01.2016 for summoning of a witness.

Counsel submits he wishes to withdraw the application and he will file

appropriate application within two days.

In view of submissions, application disposed off.

No summons have been issued in terms of order dated 01.09.2015 to the office of

the Commandant ITBP Police Force.

Ahlmad is directed to file a written explanation for the same within 3 days.

Fresh summons be issued to office of the Commandant ITBP Police Force in

terms of order dated 01.09.2015 for 29.01.2016.



FIR 80/13STATE Vs. SIRAZUDDIN Sangam Vihar05.01.2016


Sh. Sanjay Chaurasia, proxy counsel for accused with accused.

DW SI Jawahar Singh from PS Sangam Vihar is present.

HC Avdesh Kumar from PS Sangam Vihar is present and submits inadvertently

he has received the present summon and that he was not the duty officer in FIR No. 252/14.

Duty Officer who registered FIR No. 215/13 is not present despite service.

DW02 SI Jawahar Singh has been examined, crossexamined and discharged.

Fresh summons be issued to the witnesses at Sr. No. 3 & 4 of the application of

the accused for 12.01.2016.

To come up on 12.01.2016 for DE.



CC / 150/1 / 14PADMINI KESHWANI(200) Vs. CHANDER SHEKAHR BHATIA @ MICKY BHATIAMalviya Nagar05.01.2016

Present: Sh. Apoorv Khanna, proxy counsel for complainant.

Adjournment requested for advancing oral arguments on the ground that main

counsel Sh. K. K. Mannan is hospitalized.

Last and final opportunity is given to complainant to take steps, if any be taken as

per law.

To come up for arguments on 17.03.2016.



CC / 468/1 / 14 PARWATI Vs. JAI SINGH & ORS Sangam Vihar05.01.2016

Present: Sh. Arun Kumar proxy counsel for aggrieved with aggrieved.

Sh. R. B. Bhargav, Counsel for respondents with respondent no. 1.

Fresh V/n filed on behalf of the respondent no. 2 to 4. Same is taken on record.

Income affidavit filed by aggrieved as well as respondent no. 1.

Copy supplied today.

On a cursory glance it appears the respondent no. 1 has not disclosed his correct

income or the details of the loan or even the bank account. He is given one opportunity to place

on record the correct facts failing which consequences as per law shall follow.

Steps, if any be taken as per law within one week from today with advance copy

to the aggrieved.

To come up on 19.02.2016 for arguments on the interim application.



FIR No.776/15State Vs. Jagjit MalikPS Ambedkar Nagar05.01.2016


Sh. Vikram Gola, counsel for applicant / complainant.

Status report has been received from SI Ram Singh duly forwarded by SHO.

Report perused as per which investigation has been completed and the chargesheet is under

scrutiny with the prosecution branch.

In view of the report, the present application stands disposed off.

Copy of this order be given dasti, as prayed, as per rules.



CC No. 5/1Rekha Vs. Rohtash

05.01.2016Fresh application u/s. 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act received by way of assignment from the Court of Ld. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (South), Saket Courts, New Delhi. It be checked and registered as per rules.Present: Sh. Israr Khan, Counsel for aggrieved with aggrieved.

Income affidavit is on record.

Heard. Perused.

Allegations of domestic violence have been made against respondent no. 1. Prima

facie there is sufficient material to indicate existence of domestic relationship and shared

household of the aggrieved with the respondent no 1.

However, only vague allegations have been made against respondent no. and hence the summoning of respondent no. 2 to 4 is deferred till filing of DIR.

Accordingly, issue notice of the applications to the respondent no. 1 on filing of PF /RC/speed post returnable on 21.01 .2016.

Notice be issued to the Protection Officer on filing of PF for filing of DIR within

three days from the date of receipt of the application of the aggrieved. Extra copy of the

applications be placed on record to be given to the Protection Officer.



FIR 207/14PS S.J. EnclaveState V Sanjeev05.01.2016

Fresh chargesheet filed.

It be checked and registered as per rules.Present: Sh. Ritendra Singh Ld. APP for State.

IO SI Satish is present.Heard perused.Renotified for consideration.To come up on 12.01.2016 for appearance of IO.



FIR No 621/14PS Saket State V Atik05.01.2016

File taken up today on an application for cancellation of BWs moved on behalf of the accused.

Present: Sh. Ritendra Singh Ld. APP for State. Accused Atik in person with Counsel Sh. Harsh Sharma. An application for cancellation of NBW was filed by the accused on 02.01.2016.

Counsel submits that the same be treated as application for cancellation of BWs.Heard. Application perused.Having regards to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the non

appearance of the accused on the last date of hearing was not intentional. Accordingly, the application of accused seeking cancellation of BWs is allowed. BWs issued against the accused Atik stand cancelled. BWs cancelled, surety restored. Accused is warned to be careful in future.

Application disposed off accordingly.List on the date fixed i.e. 23.02.2016.



CC / 308/1 / 15 AKANKSHA Vs. VARUN GOEL & ORS. Saket05.01.2016

Present: Sh. L K Verma counsel for the aggrieved with aggrieved.

Summons to the respondent No. 1 & 2 received back unserved.

Protection officer is not present despite nor DIR has been filed.

Be awaited.



at02.22 pmPresent: Sh. Dinkar Verma counsel for the aggrieved with aggrieved.

Ms. Preeti Mudgal, Protection Officer had appeared at 01.33 PM and filed the DIR.

Issue fresh notice of the applications under D.V. Act to the respondents no.1 & 2

on filing of of PF /RC/speed post returnable on 02.02.2016.



CC / 148/1 / 15 ANJU & ANR Vs. SANJAY & ORS Ambedkar Nagar05.01.2016Present: Sh. M L Chaudhari counsel for the aggrieved with aggrieved.

Sh. S Satya Narain counsel for all respondent along with respondent no.1 & 2.

V/n on behalf of respondent be filed if not already on record.

Written statement on behalf of respondent No. 1 & 2 alongwith reply to

application U/s 23 DV Act. It is submitted that other respondents also adopt the same and will

take appropriate steps on or before the NDOH.

Income affidavit of the respondent be filed during the course of day alongwith list

of document.

Be awaited.



at03.23 pmPresent: Ms. Leena Chaudhari proxy counsel for the aggrieved with aggrieved.

Sh. S Satya Narain counsel for all respondent along with respondent no.1 & 2.

The parties had talked to each other outside the court and the aggrieved submits

that she is ready to live with respondent No.1 but not in the village.

Respondent No.1 seeks some time to propose alternate accommodation.

On request time is given.

To come up for settlement if any/arguments on 08.03.2016.



CC / 280/1 / 15 CHANDERWATI Vs. RAKESH KUMAR & ORS. Malviya Nagar05.01.2016Present: Sh. B S Randhava counsel for the aggrieved with aggrieved.

Passover requested for filing of income affidavit. Be awaited.


Saket Courts/N.D./05.01.2016at02.26 pmPresent: None.

Despite seeking a passover in the morning neither the aggrieved have filed the

income affidavit nor is present.

In the interest of justice, last and final opportunity is given to the aggrieved to file her

income affidavit and comply with order 08.12.2015 within one week from today.


Notice be issued to the protection officer for filing of DIR on filing of PF.



at03.58 pmFile taken up on request of aggrievedPresent: Sh. B S Randhava counsel for the aggrieved with aggrieved.

Income affidavit of aggrieved filed as per which the aggrieved is residing separately since 1991.

To come up for consideration on the date already fixed i.e. 23.02.2016.



CC / 298/1 / 15 NAMITA JAIN Vs. SAURABH JAIN & ORS. Malviya Nagar05.01.2016

Present: Sh. Amit Aggrawal counsel for the aggrieved with aggrieved.Be awaited.



at 03.39 pmPresent: Sh. Amit Aggrawal counsel for the aggrieved with aggrieved.

Ms. Gaiytri counsel for respondents along with respondent no.1.No time left for argument as the undersigned is also working as Link, MM to the

court of Ms. Preeti Parewa Ld. MM. To come up for arguments on 06.01.2016 on interim application. Reply filed on behalf of respondent no.3 to the application u/s 23 DV Act. Copy

supplied.



EX / 46 / 14 POOJA KUMARI Vs. RAJESH BABU Sangam Vihar05.01.2016

Present: Sh. Mukesh Birla counsel for DH with DH.

No report has been given by the Nazir as to whether warrants were issued in

pursuance of order dt. 28.11.2015.

Nazir is directed to furnish written explanation within three days from today.

Issue fresh warrants of attachment of the movable property of the JD as per the

list on filing of PF returnable on 25.02.2016.



CC / 601/1 / 14 SEEMA Vs. CHAMAN PARKASH @ RAJU & ORSSangam Vihar05.01.2016

Present: None.Be awaited for appearance of aggrieved till 03.00 PM.


Saket Courts/N.D./05.01.2016at04.05 pmPresent: Ms. Ranjan Kumari counsel for the aggrieved with aggrieved.

Fresh V/n filed on behalf of the aggrieved. Same is taken on record.

Counsel for aggrieved seeks time to take steps in terms of order dt. 04.08.2015 on

the ground that she has been engaged only today.

On request time is given.

To come up on 05.02.2016 for consideration/further proceedings.



CC / 232/1 / 15 SHEETAL KAUL Vs. NITIN SAFAYA & ORS Hauz Khas05.01.2016

Present: Sh. Rizwan Ali counsel for the aggrieved.

Notice to the respondent no.1 3 received back unserved with the report of left

premises.

Aggrieved is directed to place on record fresh address of the respondents.

To come up on 22.02.2016 for further proceedings.



FIR 1244/14STATE Vs. PRATIK SAGAR Hauz Khas05.01.2016

Present: None for the state.

Accused Pratik is present.

Notice to the IO received back with exemption report which has not been duly

forwarded by the SHO and hence cannot be considered.

Record perused.

The notice had been sent to the IO for supply of deficient documents on the

application of the accused. No explanation has been put forth by the IO for non compliance of

the directions to supply the documents rather she has mindlessly sent an exemption request

resulting in the matter being adjourned due to her casual approach.

In these circumstance notice be issued to the concerned DCP to ensure

compliance of the directions dt. 03.11.2015 by 08.01.2016.

To come up on 23.02.2016 for arguments on charge.



FIR 414/15STATE Vs. JEEWAN THAPA Safdarjung Enclave05.01.2016

Present: Sh. Ritendra Singh Ld. APP for State. Accused in person.Passover request by the accused.Be awaited.



at03.06 pmPresent: Sh. Ritendra Singh Ld. APP for State.

Accused in person with counsel Sh. S.K. Srivastav

Certain clarifications are required by the IO regarding role of the brother’sinlaw

of the accused.

Notice be issued to the IO for clarification for 11.02.2016.



FIR 252/13STATE Vs. BISWAJIT SAHA & ORS. Ambedkar Nagar05.01.2016at 03.47 pmPresent: Sh. Ritendra Singh Ld. APP for State.

Accused produced from JC.

This is the third call since morning and the matter has been repeatedly passed

over as no Legal Aid Counsel has appeared on behalf of the accused.

The reader of the court is directed to inquire from the DLSA office regarding the

same.

At this stage Sh. T M Subhani Ld. LAC from DLSA has appeared.

Sh. T M Subhani submits that he has been sent from the DLSA office in

pursuance of the telephonic query received from this court and that he is not aware whether any

Legal Aid Counsel has been appointed for the accused.

As the accused is in JC despite being released on bail on 05.12.2015, a letter of

request be sent to DLSA to expedite the request of the accused for providing Legal Aid.

At this stage an application U/s 440 Cr. PC filed by the accused for reduction of

surety amount.

To come up on 07.01.2016 for consideration of applications/arguments on charge.



CC / 544/1 / 14 PARO DEVI Vs. SHOBHA THAKUR Safdarjung Enclave05.01.2016

Present: Aggrieved in person.

Sh. N K Jain Counsel for respondent with respondent.

No steps have been taken by aggrieved in terms of directions dt. 21.12.2015.

Aggrieved submits that she be provided with Legal Aid as despite taking fees her

advocate is not appearing in this case. She is referred to DLSA office in room no. 309 for

assistance, as per rules.

To come up for remaining arguments on 06.02.2016.

Order dt. 21.12.2015 be complied afresh.



CC / 58/1 / 15 SHIVANI Vs. PARVEEN & ORS Malviya Nagar05.01.2016

Present: Sh. Tabrej Ahmad counsel for the aggrieved with aggrieved.Respondent No.1 in person.Put up for arguments at 02.00 PM.



at03.44 pmPresent: Sh. Tabrej Ahmed counsel for the aggrieved with aggrieved.

Sh. Sanjeev Kumar Sharma counsel for respondent alongwith respondent no.1.

No time left for arguments as the undersigned is also working as Link, MM to the

court of Ms. Preeti Parewa Ld. MM.

To come up for arguments on 11.01.2016 on interim application.



CC / 18/1 / 15 CHAND BIBI Vs. MOHD. MUSHTAQ Ambedkar Nagar05.01.2016

Present: Aggrieved in person. Sh. Naresh Kumar counsel for respondent along with respondent. It is already 04.11 PM.



at05.00 pmPresent: None.

Part order dictated. No time left for further dictation.To come up for orders on 11.01.2016.



CC No 4/1PS Ambedkar NagarKiran v Ravinder & Ors05.01.2016

Fresh application u/s. 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act received by way of assignment from the Court of Ld. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (South), Saket Courts, New Delhi. It be checked and registered as per rules.

Present: Sh. Vinod Yadav counsel for the aggrieved.

Aggrieved is not present and it is stated by the counsel that he could not contact the aggrieved today.

Renotify for appearance of aggrieved/consideration on 13.01.2016.



ex / 41 / 15 shehnaz vs. aftab ahmad sangam...

Documents