excellence by design - ss. simon and jude school · 2020. 2. 11. · standard. excellence by design...
TRANSCRIPT
Middle States Association of Colleges and Schools
Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
EXCELLENCE BY DESIGN
A Self-Study for Accreditation
by the Middle States Association
SS. SIMON AND JUDE SCHOOL
WEST CHESTER, PA
DATES OF TEAM VISIT
November 11 -14, 2014
Sr. Jeannine Norton, I.H.M.
PRINCIPAL
Sara Van Alstyne (2013-2014)
Bernadette Langdon (2013-2015)
INTERNAL COORDINATORS 3624 Market Street 2 West Philadelphia, PA 19104
Telephone: (267) 284-5000 FAX: (215) 662-0957
www.msa-cess.org
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Introduction 1
Organization for Growth and Improvement
Introduction................................................................................................ 3
The Internal Coordinators.......................................................................... 4
The School's Planning Team...................................................................... 5
The Role of the School's Leadership and Governance................................. 8
The Plan for Institutionalizing a Planning Ethic....................................... 10
The Plan for Communication and Awareness............................................ 12
The Plan for Periodic Reviews of the Plan for Growth and Improvement.. 13
Profile of the School
Profile of the School.................................................................................... 14
Profile of Student Performance.................................................................. 29
The School's Mission, Beliefs, and Profile of Graduates
Mission........................................................................................................ 37
Beliefs........................................................................................................... 38
Profile of Graduates..................................................................................... 40
Profile of Organizational Capacity
Introduction.................................................................................................. 43
Philosophy/Mission Standard...................................................................... 45
Governance and Leadership Standard.......................................................... 51
School Improvement Planning Standard..................................................... 61
Finances Standard........................................................................................ 67
Facilities Standard........................................................................................ 75
School Climate and Organization Standard................................................ 86
Health and Safety Standard......................................................................... 97
Page
Educational Program Standard................................................................ 110
Assessment and Evidence of Student Learning Standard........................ 119
Student Services Standard........................................................................ 126
Student Life and Student Activities Standard......................................... 135
Information Resources and Technology Standard.................................... 148
Self Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators of Quality for
Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment
Introduction.......................................................................................... 155
Religion................................................................................................. 156
Mathematics.......................................................................................... 171
English Language Arts......................................................................... 187
The Plan for Growth and Improvement................................................... 207
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 1
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
INTRODUCTION
xcellence by Design is an accreditation protocol that uses strategic planning as a
vehicle for growth and improvement in student performance and in the school’s
capacity to effect that growth. The protocol, developed by the Middle States
Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools (MSA-CESS) of the Middle States
Association of Colleges and Schools, links various planning and school growth and
improvement efforts. Excellence by Design leads the school to establish objectives for
improving student performance and organizational capacity based on its vision of a
preferred future for its students. Therefore, Excellence by Design is a future-oriented and
visionary process. In addition, the protocol provides for a continuous review of
programs and services and of the results of student performance. It also allows diverse
constituent groups to participate in charting the future of the institution.
The purpose of Excellence by Design is to provide a framework and process to guide the
school’s efforts to achieve excellence in student performance and to achieve
accreditation by the Middle States Association of Colleges and Schools—The Gold
Standard.
Excellence by Design also provides the framework for formally aligning all the work of
the school to ensure that all of its efforts are coordinated and focused on achieving the
school’s mission. It is expected that this framework will accomplish the following
purposes:
Development of a sense of community and common purpose among the school’s
students and staff, and its community of stakeholders.
A Plan for Growth and Improvement in student performance and the school’s
capacity to produce the levels of student performance expected by the school and
its community of stakeholders.
Greater cooperation between all of the school’s stakeholders in identifying and
implementing practices that have been demonstrated to lead to excellence in
student performance and the organization’s capacity to produce the desired
levels of student performance.
Most important, this framework intends to develop in the school community of
stakeholders an understanding that the school is part of a larger community of learners
and that this community has agreed upon, supports, and accepts responsibility for
assisting the school in achieving its Mission, Profile of Graduates, and Plan for Growth
E
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 2
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
and Improvement in student performance and organizational capacity. This learning
community understands that, by working together to articulate and align its efforts, it
can achieve higher levels of excellence in student performance.
In order to develop a culture of continuous growth and improvement, educational
leaders must keep the attention of the entire school community focused on answering
the five questions below. In the Excellence by Design process, the Planning Team was
guided to develop answers to the following questions:
#1: By the time they have experienced our full educational program and services,
what should our students know, and how should they be able to use what
they know? What content, skills, and work habits should be the priorities for
learning? What attitudes, qualities or characteristics should our students
demonstrate?
#2: How well should students perform the desired outcomes and what does
excellent performance look like?
#3: How will we measure and evaluate our students’ performance in multiple
ways?
#4: How well do our students currently perform? What is the actual quality of
their work?
#5: What must we do to improve student performance?
In setting a course for continuous improvement in student and organizational
performance, schools and their communities must study not only what the existing data
tell them about their students’ present performance, but they must also set clear targets
for what they want student performance to be in the future. Maintaining a focus on
these five questions is essential to a successful continuous improvement process and is a
“habit of mind” that must be cultivated and nurtured by the school’s leaders and those
leading the growth and improvement efforts. Too often schools find themselves
working on curriculum and instructional materials and engaging in professional
development before they have clearly decided what their students should know, how
they should use their content knowledge, process skills, and work habits, and what the
quality of their performance should be.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 3
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
ORGANIZATION FOR GROWTH AND
IMPROVEMENT
n this section of the school's self-study, the school is asked to ensure that it has the
organizational elements and processes that are necessary for the school to be
successful in achieving its Plan for Growth and Improvement. The school has or has
developed the organizational elements and processes described below:
Leadership for Growth and Improvement
The primary role of the leadership and governing body of the school—those in
positions of authority and influence within the school— in the school improvement
process is to serve as the “champions” for developing a planning ethic and the Growth
and Improvement process. Strategic planning experts have long held that champions
are extremely important to the success of planning for growth and improvement in any
organization. Because the a major goal of the self-study and accreditation process is to
ensure that the school has a vision and a plan to achieve the vision that is accepted and
supported by all, leaders must communicate publicly, clearly, and often that
the planning process is important for the future of the school and its students,
and
they will provide the leadership, resources, and support needed to make the
process and the plan successful.
This critical role for leaders also applies to the heads and governing bodies of larger
organizations of which the school may be a part. It is very difficult for an individual
school within a larger system to plan strategically for improving student performance
without the clear support and assistance of its parent organization. They, too, must
“champion the cause.”
It is also important for the head of school and at least one representative of the
governing body to serve, when appropriate, on the Planning Team. However, in this
role, the leaders should serve as “equals among equals” by serving on the Team as
members with the same authority and influence as all other members of the Team. This
is often a difficult role to take, because educational organizations are typically
organized as hierarchies, and the leaders are often expected to make the decisions in a
“top down” manner. However, if the goal is to identify a mission and plan to achieve it
I
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 4
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
that is “owned” by all the stakeholders of the school, the mission and plan must be
developed through a grass roots level—bottom up, rather than top down.
A. Internal Coordinators
A required component of the protocol is the appointment of a team of Internal
Coordinators. The primary functions of the Internal Coordinators are to
coordinate the institution’s planning process and the development of a plan for
growth in student performance.
oversee planning and preparation for the Visiting Team visit.
prepare for the Mid-Term Report.
provide the energy, enthusiasm, and expertise to move the process forward.
The Internal Coordinators for the self-study and accreditation process are
Name Role in the Institution Sara Van Alstyne 4th grade teacher
Bernadette Langdon 6th grade teacher
A.1 How and why were the Internal Coordinators selected?
The principal invited the two teachers to assume the role because they possess a sincere interest
in the success of the school. They demonstrate a desire for continuous growth in their own
classroom practices, have a positive rapport with colleagues, and possess the leadership,
organizational and writing skills that would be beneficial.
A.2 How did the Internal Coordinators fulfill their role and responsibilities?
The Internal Coordinators were responsible for setting meeting times and agenda focus for the
Planning Team. They kept the Planning Team on track and set realistic goals and directives for
the subcommittees and their chairs. They were often the avenue for clarification with Angela
Rufo, our MSA representative. These Internal Coordinators conducted the portion of the regular
faculty meeting devoted to Middle States issues and directed any Middle States work days. They,
with the team, determined the information to be disseminated to the faculty and ensured that all
were kept informed.
A.3 What kinds of support and assistance were provided to the Internal
Coordinators to enable them to fulfill their responsibilities?
Both coordinators, with the principal, attended the initial orientation meeting on April 10, 2013.
Mrs. Angela Rufo also presented an overview of the process to the entire faculty on August 28,
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 5
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
2013. Mrs. Rufo remained an excellent and supportive source of assistance throughout the
process. Both coordinators were given an assistant during all of 13-14 for an hour a week to help
with clerical work for class needs and/or Middle States. Fellow faculty members assisted with
offers to take duties and cover a class when possible. As spring approached and the work
deadline became more imminent, substitutes were employed to give the coordinators the time to
tackle the work with sustained focus.
B. The Planning Team1
A major commitment the school makes when seeking accreditation is to include a
varied spectrum of the school's stakeholders in the process of continually defining a
preferred vision, in developing the means to get closer to that vision, and in
implementing the action plans developed by these stakeholders. In summary, it is
expected that the Planning Team will be given the authority, resources, and support to
develop the vision for the school by creating or reaffirming a statement of
mission.
develop a set of beliefs to serve as the ethical code for the institution.
develop a profile of the knowledge, skills, and qualities the institution expects of
its graduates.
identify the areas of student performance that are the priorities for growth and
improvement.
oversee development of the action plans to achieve the performance objectives.
monitor implementation of the action plans.
conduct a periodic review of the progress being made to achieving the objectives.
The protocol requires that the Planning Team includes a varied spectrum of the school's
community of stakeholders. Because Middle States’ member institutions are so varied in
type and situation, Middle States does not prescribe what groups constitute a school's
stakeholders. This is a local decision. However, the school's leadership and the Planning
Team will be expected to provide a rationale for the composition of the Planning Team.
1It is important to note that, although the Excellence by Design protocol calls this stakeholder group a
Planning Team, what the school calls this group is not important. Its purpose, composition, operation,
and results are what is key. What the protocol requires for accreditation is that this group meets the letter
and spirit of the requirements for a Planning Team without regard to what it is called. In many schools,
an improvement team already exists and includes the required stakeholders, so it makes sense for the
school to continue that organization with any adjustments necessary to meet the requirements of the
ExBD protocol. This same principle applies to all requirements of the protocol. It is less important what
elements and products of the process are called than it is that the school meets the intentions and results
of the requirements.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 6
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Because the school is committing itself to developing a planning ethic and a culture of
continuous improvement, the Planning Team should be institutionalized. The
institution must find ways to integrate the work of the Planning Team into the culture
of the school and the work of the school. In most cases, this will require a concerted
effort and the opening to examination of how the institution thinks about institutional
growth and improvement and who is responsible to lead it.
B.1 The members of the Planning Team are
Name Role in the Institution Sr. Jeannine Norton, I.H.M. principal
Sara Van Alstyne 4th grade teacher (not on 14-15 faculty)
Eileen Snow 3rd grade teacher
Bernadette Langdon 6th grade teacher
Susanne Rice Parent
John McGrath 8th grade teacher (not on 14-15 faculty)
B.2 What charge was given to the Planning Team? What authority was it given to
oversee, monitor, and make decisions regarding the school’s planning for
growth and improvement in student performance and organizational
capacity?
The Team was given authority to
plan the sequential steps of the process for all.
review the survey results and edit comments for general faculty and staff in order to omit
specific names/references.
decide their own tasks in the assessment of standards, in the adherence to quality
indicators of the academic areas, and in the selection and formation of the action plan
goals.
inform the faculty and other stakeholders of progress and decisions; guide the
understanding of the tasks to be completed and set realistic timelines for work
completion.
solicit formal and informal input from the faculty and staff.
analyze all sources of input in order to guide the formation of concrete goals for an action
plan to ensure future growth and improvement.
contact Mrs. Angela Rufo with any questions as the work progressed.
keep aware of the pulse of the community. Encourage effort and serious attention to
detail and task completion, while also being the cheerleaders of every step and the
encouragers of time-out when needed.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 7
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B.3 How does the membership of the Team reflect the diversity within the
school’s community of stakeholders?
The Team was comprised of four teachers, representing various grade levels in the school, (3rd,
4th, 6th, and 8th) one member from the school’s administration and one parent. The teachers
selected represent varying years of educational experience in total and/or in this school. Mr.
McGrath came to SSJ in the 2013-2014 school year in his 9th year of teaching. Mrs. Snow has
completed twenty of her thirty nine years in SSJ. Mrs. Langdon’s 16.5 years at SSJ are the
major part of her 19.5 total years in education and Mrs. Van Alstyne’s 9 years have all been with
SSJ. The level of accreditation experience is also diverse. The principal has served on other
accreditation committees and teams in other schools and other dioceses. Mrs. Langdon and Mrs.
Snow participated in a previous accreditation process here at SSJ and Mrs. Langdon served on a
team in May 2014. The other members enter this as a new experience. Mrs. Rice has two
children currently in the school and two graduates now in high school. She has served on the
Home and School Board as volunteer coordinator, is active in CYO and was the former school
secretary.
B.4 How were the members of the Planning Team selected?
In addition to soliciting the two chairpersons, Sr. Jeannine Norton, principal, invited all faculty
members to volunteer. Mr. McGrath and Mrs. Snow graciously offered their time and expertise.
Mrs. Rice was invited as a parent and former school secretary. It was suggested that an
appropriate number for our Planning Team would be between 6 and 8, and thus 6 was decided as
a workable number for this school.
B.5 How does the Planning Team function and make its decisions?
At the formation of the team, there was a clear decision that all have equal voice, whether
internal coordinator, school administrator, teacher, or parent; whether experienced with the
process or new to it. The team began meeting in August 2013 and meetings averaged weekly
from September onward. Initially, much of the work was brainstormed and accomplished in
whole group meetings. As each member became more comfortable with the vision and the
process, a collaborated writing using the "Google docs" platform was used. The meetings then
became an avenue to review completed work and come to consensus.
B.6 How often did the Planning Team meet? (Provide a list of the Team’s meetings
and minutes for the meetings in the Team’s workroom.) The Planning Team met almost weekly and toward the end of the process sometimes twice
weekly. At first they shared responsibilities on a rotating basis with a different member of the
team to set the agenda, lead the meeting, and record the minutes. As the months progressed the
agenda was set by consensus of need; the coordinators took the usual lead and the responsibility
of minutes was commonly done by one but shared at times.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 8
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B.7 What is the Planning Team’s relationship to any other groups in the school, if
any, responsible for planning for growth and improvement in student
performance?
Five of the six members of the Planning Team are faculty members and administration and so are
directly involved in planning for growth and improvement in student performance.
B.8 What is the Planning Team’s plan for rotating membership of the Team and
identifying new members? What is the plan for training and orienting new
members to the work of the Team?
There is no plan to alter the membership before the Accreditation Visit in the fall. Should a need
arise, a faculty member from a similar grade level would be invited to join the Planning Team.
Because the team has been so interactive and transparent at faculty meetings when working with
committees and in keeping everyone informed via emails, the orientation for a new member, if
needed, would be minimal.
B.9 How will the Planning Team function after the visit of the Visiting Team and
during the implementation of the Plan for Growth and Improvement?
It is the decision of the Planning Team that at least 2 to 3 members will remain and become
members of the Implementation Team which will be expanded as needed. Those faculty
members who chaired the curricular area assessments will be specifically invited to be part of the
Implementation Team, and other faculty and stakeholders will be invited as their interest and
expertise would enhance the vision and further the realization of the goals.
C. Role of the School’s Leadership and Governance
It is school's formal leaders—those in positions of authority and influence within the
school—who should serve as the primary “champions” for the planning process and
the Plan for Growth and Improvement. Strategic planning experts have long held that
champions are extremely important to the success of planning. Because a goal of the
self-study and accreditation process is to develop a vision and a plan to achieve it that is
accepted and supported by the entire community of the school, the school's leaders and
governing body must communicate clearly and often that this process is important for
the future of the school and its students, and that they will provide the leadership,
resources, and support needed to make the process and the plan successful.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 9
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
C.1. What role has the school’s leadership and governance played in the self-study
process and the planning for growth and improvement in student
performance?
The school’s leadership and governance have been actively involved in the entire reaccreditation
of Saints Simon and Jude School. They showed their support financially in providing funds for
Survey Monkey and in their plans to provide any additional items needed for the team visit. The
Finance Council participated in relevant sections of the survey along with the other stakeholder
groups.
The principal, Sister Jeannine Norton, has provided a constant positive attitude and constructive
energy to propel the staff through this multi-level process. Not only was she a member of the
planning team, but she kept the parents informed through Home and School Association meeting
presentations, the weekly church bulletin and school newsletter and worked collaboratively with
the teachers throughout the year. Sensitive to the additional demands the task required, she
provided flexible scheduling to the faculty whenever possible to enable committee members to
accomplish their tasks effectively.
C.2. How has the leadership provided support for the self-study and accreditation
processes? The school leadership provided financial support which allowed for online software for
distribution of surveys and analysis of results. In addition, the leadership allowed full access to
required materials so that an accurate self-assessment could be conducted. The leadership
encouraged the planning team to attend training sessions and paid for substitute teachers when
needed to allow for their attendance.
C.3. If the school is part of a larger system of schools, what role did the leadership
and governance of the system play in the planning process? What kind of
support did that leadership and governance provide for the school’s planning
efforts?
The Archdiocesan Office of Catholic Education is always available for questions. The original
orientation meeting for administrators and Internal Coordinators was jointly directed by
representatives of the Archdiocese and Middle States Association. The central office is not only
supportive of the school entering the process, but holds it as an expectation. During the annual
formal visitation, the progress of the study was discussed and an offer of help/advice was
extended.
D. The Plan for Institutionalizing a Planning Ethic
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 10
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A sound planning ethic is critical to achieving the school’s mission, its objectives for
growth and improvement in student performance and organizational capacity, and to
its capacity to effect the intended growth. An effective planning ethic addresses the
essential question: “Does the school and its community of stakeholders have the
capacity, the will, and the systematic structures and processes required to develop and
implement its plan and achieve its objectives?” A fine plan full of great activities is only
as strong as the ability and willingness of the school and its stakeholders to implement
it.
While successful planning is reflective of the school’s context and culture, it should be
visionary in describing what the school and its stakeholder community want for their
students and pragmatic in specifying the steps to reach that goal. Successful planning
for growth and improvement has been described as a delicate balance between brave
steps forward and reassuring steps to the side; between the recognition of the need for
growth and a celebration of what already exists that is good, steady, and/or certain;
between the bold, frequently scary, visions of future possibilities and the comfort with
past and present successes.
When a school seeks accreditation using the Excellence by Design protocol, it must
commit to working toward establishing and sustaining a planning ethic within the
school. A planning ethic means that planning for growth and improvement becomes
part of what the school and its community of stakeholders do as much as teaching, and
providing programs, resources, services, and activities. A planning ethic requires
continuous clarification of the community’s unique mission, beliefs, profile of
graduates, and student and organizational performance goals. It requires that all of its
processes are vision-driven, and it requires that the community is action-oriented by
developing and implementing long-term, strategic action plans that integrate programs,
services, facilities, and support to address the school’s growth objectives.
In the Excellence by Design protocol, the school also makes a commitment to continuous
growth and improvement. The school and its stakeholders should demonstrate that
they are never satisfied with the status quo in terms of how their students perform but
are striving constantly to improve the levels of performance. The setting of and striving
to achieve challenging growth objectives should become a dynamic process in which
the school develops the flexibility to revise and modify its plans to achieve its objectives
based on the results received from implementing those plans. As part of the
accreditation process, the school must review the results of its efforts periodically and
open its processes and results willingly to review by its peers in the Middle States
Association.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 11
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A planning ethic also requires the school to commit to involving its stakeholders in
meaningful ways in the setting of objectives, developing plans to achieve and measure
those objectives, and the implementation of those plans. In a planning culture, the
school strives to develop broad ownership of both the planning process and the Plan for
Growth and Improvement by the entire community by ensuring broad based
knowledge and understanding of and support for the objectives and the plans to
achieve them.
A planning ethic that provides significant roles for the stakeholders of the school also
has the effect of sharing among the stakeholders responsibility for the success of any
planning for growth and improvement. Excellence by Design builds such roles and
responsibilities into the self-study and planning processes. Therefore, if implemented
faithfully, Excellence by Design can provide the school with the vehicle it needs to build
sustainability into its planning for growth and improvement, because ownership of and
responsibility for the success of the planning process and the Plan for Growth and
Improvement no longer rest with one person (the head of the school) but with all of the
school’s stakeholders.
Over the course of the next 3 years, the Implementation Team will use the Objectives and Action
Plans developed during 2013-2014 as a guide for self-assessment. As sub-committees are formed
within the Student Performance Objective areas of Math and ELA (Writing), the team will
provide the support and guidance needed to maintain forward motion through the steps laid out
in the Action Plans. The Organizational Objective will also be monitored by the already
established security committee. The Implementation Team will
communicate regularly with sub-committee members and other stakeholder groups to
report progress 2-3 times per year at faculty meetings and Home and School Association
meetings.
work to obtain financial resources as needed to achieve objectives.
maintain a file of documentation for the work to facilitate the third year MSA re-
evaluation.
coordinate school schedules and calendars to assure that testing and analysis of results
occurs in a timely fashion and on schedule as defined by the Action Plans.
invite all members of stakeholder groups to give feedback on the process of
implementation.
motivate the faculty and staff throughout the process and recognize key players, and the
faculty and student body, as the interim milestones of the Action Plans are reached.
Recognition of successes will be reported in the school newsletter, on the website, at
faculty meetings, student assemblies, and other school events.
E. A Plan for Communication and Awareness
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 12
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
An important factor in increasing the likelihood that a school will achieve the goals it
has set in its Plan for Growth and Improvement is to ensure broad ownership of the
planning process and the Plan for Growth and Improvement across the entire school
and its stakeholder community. This is accomplished by ensuring broad based
knowledge about understanding, and support for the school’s performance objectives
and the plans to achieve them.
Therefore, an important element of the planning process communicating with the
school’s staff, students, governing board, and other stakeholders to ensure they are
aware of the requirements of the Excellence by Design protocol, the school’s planning
process, mission, objectives, action plans and, eventually, its accomplishments as it
implements its plan. The communication process should include means for obtaining
from the members of the school’s stakeholder community input and feedback regarding
the products of the planning process (i.e., mission, objectives, action plans).
Stakeholders cannot support and take ownership in what the school is doing unless
they first know about it and are invited to join in the process.
The primary purpose of communication is to develop a critical mass within the school’s
community of stakeholders with knowledge about, understanding of, and support for
the planning process and the Plan for Growth and Improvement in student learning
and the organization’s capacity to produce learning at the level expected.
At SS. Simon and Jude School:
All lines of communication will be used as an avenue for updates on the status of the Action
Plan. These include updates on progress, requests for assistance as needed, and plans to celebrate
achievements through the following methods:
Announcements at Morning Assembly
Articles in the online school newsletter and parish bulletin
Articles on the school and parish websites
Announcements at Home and School meetings, Faculty meetings, Back to School Night
for parents, and at Parish Council meetings.
F. A Plan for Periodic Reviews of the Plan for Growth and
Improvement
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 13
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
In order to institutionalize a planning ethic, continuous growth and improvement in
student and organizational performance must become a way of life within the school. It
must be an ongoing, dynamic, and “evergreen” process. It is expected and required that
the Plan for Growth and Improvement that is developed and presented for
accreditation will be implemented faithfully over the length of the accreditation term.
Consequently, it should be anticipated, and it should be expected that implementing the
activities of the action plans and gathering the results of the assessments used to
measure the student and organizational performance objectives will indicate there is a
need to revise the action plans regularly based on what is working and what is not.
Therefore, the Excellence by Design protocol includes the requirement for formal reviews
of the action plans and progress toward achieving the performance objectives are
conducted periodically but, as a minimum, at least once annually.
At SS. Simon and Jude School:
The members of the planning team will review the progress toward implementation of the action
plans each spring and fall. They will access and analyze the testing results in concert with the
faculty. Those results will be reported to all other stakeholders. Based on their review,
adjustments to the ongoing action plans will be made at the end of the faculty meeting.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 14
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
THE PROFILE OF THE SCHOOL
he Profile of the School includes the following information and data that 1)
describe the community(ies) the school serves and in which it exists, 2) help to
develop an understanding of the school’s Mission, and 3) describe the
opportunities for and challenges to the school as it seeks to achieve its Mission. The
Profile includes
a brief history of the community, its schools, and its traditions.
descriptions of the demographic and social and economic characteristics of the
community, its constituencies, and its schools.
the climate for teaching and learning in the school.
description of the number and qualifications of the professional and support
staffs.
description of the number and characteristics of the student population.
key trends or changes occurring in the school and its community(ies).
The data and information contained in the Profile of the School are not evaluated by the
Visiting Team. Instead, the Profile serves two purposes:
To ensure that the members of the Planning Team have a common knowledge
base about the history and current status of the school in those areas on which
the accreditation of the school will focus; and
To “introduce” members of the Visiting Team to the school, and as such, provide
one of the lenses through which Team members will view and evaluate the
school. Thus, the Profile section should provide sufficient information about the
school and student performance to build and enhance Team members’
awareness and understanding of the total milieu in which the school exists and
operates.
PROFILE OF THE SCHOOL’S COMMUNITY
A.1. Provide a description of the community. Describe its history and major
characteristics, including geographic location and socioeconomic and
demographic makeup.
SS. Simon & Jude School is located in West Chester, Pennsylvania. The town of West Chester is
in Chester County and has been the seat of local government since 1786. West Chester is
T
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 15
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
comprised of seven municipalities that include East Goshen, West Goshen, East Bradford,
Birmingham, Pocopson, Westtown, and The Borough of West Chester. The majority of SS.
Simon & Jude’s student population draws from East Goshen, West Goshen, and Westtown. The
population of West Chester as of the 2010 census was 18,857. Local attractions include West
Chester University, Brandywine Battlefield, Longwood Gardens, Valley Forge Park, and
Brandywine River Museum. The town is located 25 miles west of Philadelphia PA and 17 miles
north of Wilmington, DE which also adds a bounty of attractions.
The population of Chester County is 506,575. Demographically, the residents of Chester County
are 81.5% Caucasian, 6.8% Hispanic, 6.4% African American, 4.3% Asian and 1% other. 5.9%
of the residents are under 5 years of age, 24.1% are under 18 years of age and 13.7% are over 65
years of age; 92.7% of the population has earned a high school diploma (or equivalent) or better;
88.1% of the county speaks English as the first language at home. The median household
income is $86,184 and 6.5% of residents are below poverty level.
A.2. Describe any changes in the community occurring over the last five years that
have had an impact on the school. Indicate any changes that are expected to
occur during the next five years.
SS. Simon and Jude’s School student population has decreased from 421 in 2008 to 366 in 2014
(13%) while the population of the county increased from 491,489 to 506,575 (3%). As with
many cities and towns in the United States, West Chester has experienced the effects of the
recession over the past five years. In addition, some factors that may have led to the decline in
enrollment include the abuse scandal in the Catholic Church, the gradual move of families from
SSJ to Saints Peter and Paul School founded in 2001, and the ability of the West Chester Area
School District to better assist students with special learning needs.
There are no major changes in the local community expected in the next five years that would
have a strong impact on enrollment in the school. It is hoped that a potential papal visit to the
Philadelphia area will offer a surge in enrollment, along with continued aggressive marketing for
the school.
A.3. Describe the major challenges currently faced by the community—social,
economic, political.
As with all communities in the United States, West Chester is also challenged with the slump in
economic growth. Their five year plan reflects their commitment to growing and strengthening
businesses in the area. Focus will also be on the health of their citizens and protection of their
natural resources.
A.4. List the major educational and cultural programs and facilities in the
community that are available for use by the schools and their students.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 16
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Program/Facility Field Trips (local museums, theaters and historical sites)
After School Programs (Science Explorers, After School Art Classes, Robotics, Tutoring,
Chorus, Reading Olympics, Kitchen Wizards, Homework Help Club, Study Skills Clinic,
Creative Engineering)
C.A.R.E.S. Program
CYO Sports
Girl Scouts and Boy Scouts
Model United Nations
Youth Ministry
DARE Program
Guest Speakers and School Assemblies
Teacher and Administrative Professional Development provided by Chester County Intermediate
Unit, Immaculata and West Chester Universities)
Intermediate Unit of Chester County Support Staff (Guidance Councilor, Reading Specialist,
Math Specialist, Speech & Language Specialist)
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 17
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B.1. History of the School:
Provide a brief history of the school. Include key milestones and developments in the
life of the school.
SS. Simon and Jude is a Roman Catholic School located in Westtown Township, West Chester,
Pennsylvania. SS. Simon and Jude’s official beginning was May 25, 1961, when Reverend
Joseph A. Cavanaugh founded the parish for the Catholic families in the area.
On September 4, 1962, SS. Simon and Jude School opened its doors to the children of the parish
with an enrollment of three hundred twenty-seven students. The Sisters, Servants of the
Immaculate Heart of Mary staffed the school. The Congregation is committed to the apostolate
of teaching from preschool to college / university levels. The Motherhouse is located on the
grounds of Immaculata University, in Malvern, Pennsylvania. Initially, four sisters and two lay
teachers comprised the first faculty. Grades one through four were one classroom each; grades
five through eight were double classes. There were eight classrooms at its opening.
In the summer of 1970, eight new classrooms were completed and construction of the
gymnasium began. By November 1970, the two-story building had sixteen classrooms, two for
each grade from one through eight. There were five religious teachers, an IHM sister working as
principal, and eleven lay faculty members.
In September of 1990, ground was broken for a new wing to be used for school and parish uses.
In that wing four classrooms, library, music room, faculty room, computer room, a large parish
social room, kitchenette, bathrooms, and smaller rooms to be used for tutoring were constructed.
This new wing provided space in the older part of the building for a kindergarten class. In
September 1991, the first kindergarten class began. A morning and afternoon session was
offered. In September 1992, a second kindergarten class was formed to expand the school to two
sections of each grade, kindergarten through eight.
In 2002, the parish celebrated its fortieth anniversary. In the spring of 2004, ground was broken
to begin the construction of a new church. The renovation allowed increased space and
utilization of the original building for both parish and school needs. This included a designated
lunch-room and relocation of kitchen and restroom facilities. In 2008, the Intermediate Unit was
moved from outside trailers into the school building. Spanish was added for K-8, as well as a
formal art room. In 2009, a dedicated Science Lab was established.
In 2012, SS. Simon and Jude School celebrated its 50th anniversary. This current 2013-14
school year, faculty and services have grown to include a principal, twenty-four full time faculty
members, and four part-time teachers. Student body is currently at 366. All students are
scheduled for classroom music, art enrichment, technology, physical education, library
instruction and Spanish. Students may choose to participate in choral groups and instrumental
music. The building was renovated during the summer of 2013, adding a new HVAC system
throughout the school. All rooms were freshly painted, new window shades were added, and
ceilings were lowered to accommodate new wiring and lighting fixtures. In addition, the
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 18
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
computer lab was upgraded with 30 new iPads to keep technology resources up to date with
current educational trends. Students in grades 5-8 have been issued their own individual
netbooks or tablets for classroom instruction.
B.2. Description of the School:
Official Name of the
School
SS. Simon & Jude School
Address of the Main
Campus (street address,
city, state, zip code)
6 Cavanaugh Court
West Chester PA 19382
Telephone Number of
Main Campus
610-696-5249
Fax Number of Main
Campus
610-696-4682
Name and Title of Head
of School
Sister Jeannine Norton IHM, Principal
E-mail Address of Head
of the School
Website Address for the
School
www.simonandjude.org
Type of Organization
(check all that apply)
Public
Independent
X Not for Profit
Proprietary
X Religious
X Academic
Career and Technical
Secondary Students
Postsecondary Students
Year School Began
Operating 1962
Date Charter/License to
Operate Granted
Year of First Graduating
Class 1963
State/Agency/Country
Granting License to
Operate
PA
Diplomas/Certificates 8th
Grade Graduation Diploma
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 19
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
School is Licensed to
Grant
Calendar System
(quarter, semester,
trimester, 12-month,
other)
Trimester
Currently Accredited by
Name of Agency Accredited Until
Middle States Association of
Colleges and Schools
2015
B.3. SCHOOL INFORMATION: INDEPENDENT, RELIGIOUS, AND
PROPRIETARY SCHOOLS
This section is not applicable to our school.
Is the school incorporated? Yes
X No
If yes, Name of Corporation:
Is the school licensed to operate as an
educational school?
X Yes
No
If yes,
In what state(s) is the school licensed to
operate?
PA
In what country(ies) is the school
licensed to operate?
USA
If no, explain the school’s authority to
operate:
Is the school licensed to grant diplomas
or certificates?
X Yes
No
If yes,
In what state(s) is the school licensed to
grant diplomas or certificates?
PA
Type(s) of diplomas or certificates
offered
8th
grade diploma
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 20
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
If no, explain the school’s authority to
grant diplomas or certificates:
Religious Affiliation: Roman Catholic
B.4. SCHOOL INFORMATION: PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Is the school part of a larger school
district, system, or corporation?
Yes
X No
If yes, Name of
District/System/Corporation:
B.5. SCHOOL INFORMATION: ALL SCHOOLS
B.5.a. Enrollment Trends
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013 -- 2014
Grades
Included in
This School
PAST PRESENT PROJECTED
BOYS/GIRLS
Two Years
Ago
BOYS/GIRLS
One Year
Ago
BOYS/GIRLS
This Year
BOYS/GIRLS
Next Year
Kindergarten 22 21 17 24 21 26 26 22
Grade 1 31 25 23 20 17 19 21 25
Grade 2 18 25 27 26 23 20 17 16
Grade 3 30 21 17 25 25 26 21 19
Grade 4 21 22 29 19 18 26 23 26
Grade 5 20 21 29 19 28 19 17 25
Grade 6 21 13 20 18 17 16 27 16
Grade 7 22 19 19 13 17 17 17 13
Grade 8 19 21 22 19 19 12 16 16
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 21
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Grades
Included in
This School
PAST PRESENT PROJECTED
BOYS/GIRLS
Two Years
Ago
BOYS/GIRLS
One Year
Ago
BOYS/GIRLS
This Year
BOYS/GIRLS
Next Year
TOTALS 204 188 194 183 185 181 185 178
B.5..a.1. Explain any significant or unusual enrollment trends for this school.
Since 2008 there has been a 13% decline in enrollment. In addition to recent economic
recession, internal church turmoil and scandal, and the need for more educational supports
available in the school district for some children, other specific factors for decline appear to be:
Some parents choose the school for the full day kindergarten not offered by the public
schools and do not intend to continue their child’s education at this school. Thus they
depart after kindergarten.
Saints Peter and Paul School was established in 2001 and some families who were
previously “districted” for Saints Simon and Jude were now in that parish boundary.
There was a grace period where families could remain in this school and parish. However
as the years have progressed and Saints Peter and Paul is a stable school environment,
there is no longer a need/desire to remain in these parish/school boundaries. Thus
families whose older children attended SSJ have younger ones at Saints Peter and Paul.
Some families choose to move to public/private schools in the middle grades. There is an
expressed perception by parents that the middle school is not as academically strong as
desired. Efforts to assess and address the substantiated concerns are being taken, but the
change in perception is expected to be slow and gradual.
B.5.b. Student Demographic Trends:
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013 -- 2014
Student Characteristic:
Percent of Student Body
Now
Percent of Student Body
Two Years Ago
Caucasian/White 93.8% 97.8%
Hispanic 4% .2%
Asian 2% 2%
Haitian .2% 0%
African American 0% 0%
TOTAL 100% 100%
B.5.b.1. Explain any significant or unusual demographic trends for this school.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 22
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
While the school welcomes all children, there have been no significant demographic changes.
Since its foundation, it has reflected the neighboring community with the student population
being predominately Caucasian.
B.5.c. Size of the Professional and Support Staffs
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013 - 2014
Full-Time Part-time
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF:
Administrators 1
INSTRUCTIONAL STAFF:
Classroom teachers-elementary/lower
school 12
0
Classroom teachers- middle school 6
Other Curricular Area teachers (Art, Music,
Gym, Technology, Spanish, Library, Math
Honors, Religious Enrichment)
2 6
STUDENT SERVICES STAFF:
Guidance/college/career counselors 1
Specialists and consultants (IU) 3
Technology services personnel 1
Health services personnel 2
SUPPORT STAFF:
Paraprofessionals and aides 1 3
Secretaries and clerks 1
Custodial personnel 2
Maintenance personnel 1
Food services personnel 2
Security personnel
Other: Instrumental Music Instructor 1
Other: Director of Religious Education 1
B.5.c.1. Describe significant trends in size of the staff that have had or may have an
impact on the education program, provision of student services, personnel,
facilities or finances.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 23
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
The only recent addition of staff (within five years) was the employment of a part-time Spanish
teacher. Since 1992 there have been full time classroom teachers for two divisions of K to 8, as
well as part time instructors for Honors Math, Art, Music, PE, Library skills, and Technology.
As needs dictate in the primary unit, the placement and hours for instructional aides have varied.
B.5.d. Experience of the Staff
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013 - 2014
Years 0-1 2-5 6-10 11-20 over 20
Administrative
Staff
Women 1
Men
Instructional Staff
Women 2 8 7 8
Men 1 1
Student Services
Staff (IU)
Women 2 1 3
Men
Support Staff
Women 1 2 4 1
Men 1 1 2
B.5.d.1. Describe significant trends in experience of the staff that have had or may
have an impact on the education program, provision of student services,
personnel, facilities or finances.
There have been no significant changes in the years of experience of the staff. The newly hired
have intentionally been chosen to maintain a balance of new and experienced teachers. In recent
years, no new hire has met or exceeded the years of service for the previous employee so
finances are positively affected, but not to a major degree. The financial aspect is not the
deciding factor in hiring personnel.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 24
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B.5.e. Academic Preparation of the Professional Staff
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013 - 2014
Associate’s or
No Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Administrative
Staff
Women 1
Men
Instructional
Staff
Women 17 9
Men 2 1
Student Services
Staff
Women 4 4
Men
B.5.e.1. Describe significant trends in the academic preparation of the staff that have
had or may have an impact on the education program, provision of student
services, personnel, facilities or finances.
A higher percentage of the professional staff have advanced to graduate degrees, which not only
impacts the marketing statistics, but more important allows the teachers to continue their own
journey as life-long learners, become more familiar with the latest best practices and then share
in professional dialogue with colleagues.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 25
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B.5.f. Professional Certifications of the Professional Staff
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013 - 2014
No
Certificate
Early
Child.
PK-K
Certificate
Elementary
Level (K-6)
Certificate
Elementary
and Middle
Level
Certificate
Curricular
Areas
Administrative
Certificate
Administrative
Staff
Women 1
Men
Instructional
Staff
Women 1
(2 pending) 1 14 2 4
Men 2
Student
Services Staff
Women 4 1 1
Men
B.5.f.1. Describe significant trends in the professional certification of the staff that
have had or may have an impact on the education program, provision of
student services, personnel, facilities or finances.
There are no significant changes in the status of professional certification. All professional staff
meet the diocesan requirements for certification and/or degree and all maintain updates through
Pennsylvania Act 48 and/or workshop and in-services each year.
B.5.g. Staff Demographic Trends
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2012 - 2013
Race/Ethnicity Percent of Staff in
Current Year
Percent of Staff Two
Years Ago
African-American 1% 1%
Asian 0% 0%
Caucasian/White 99% 99%
Hispanic 0% 0%
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 26
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Native American Indian 0% 0%
Other: 0% 0%
Other: 0% 0%
TOTAL 100% 100%
B.5.g.1. Describe significant trends in the demographics of the staff that have had or
may have an impact on the education program, provision of student services,
personnel, facilities or finances.
There have been no significant changes in staff demographics.
B.5.h. Staff Turnover
B.5.a. Indicate the percentage of each category below that were new hires (or
assumed a new position within the school) in the year indicated.
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013 - 2014
Percent New Hires
Three Years Ago
Percent New Hires
Two Years Ago
Percent New Hires
One Year Ago
Administrative
Staff 100% 0% 0%
Instructional Staff 9.1% 4.5% 29.2%
Student Services
Staff 11.1% 22.2% 30%
Support Staff 7.1% 21.4% 17.6%
TOTAL 100% 100% 100%
B.5.h.2 Indicate the percentage of each category below that left the staff or moved
to a new position) in the year indicated.
Percent
Changeover Three
Years Ago
Percent
Changeover Two
Years Ago
Percent
Changeover One
Year Ago
Administrative
Staff 0% 0% 0%
Instructional Staff 4.5% 13.6% 16%
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 27
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Percent
Changeover Three
Years Ago
Percent
Changeover Two
Years Ago
Percent
Changeover One
Year Ago
Student Services
Staff 4.5% 22.2% 43%
Support Staff 7.1% 7.1% 0%
TOTAL 100% 100 100%
B.5.h.3. Describe significant trends in staff turnover that have had or may have an
impact on the education program, provision of student services, personnel,
facilities or finances.
Generally, there has been no significant turnover in the staff. With the new administration, a
few staff members retired, but most of the recent changes have only affected Grades 5 and 6.
There have been new hires and new assignments with the goal being to place those best able to
meet the needs and rigorous academic demands of this age group.
B.5.i. Participation In and Support for the School
Parents
X
X Exceeds Expectations
Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Community members and organizations
X
Exceeds Expectations
X Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
The business community
X
X Exceeds Expectations
Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 28
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Unsatisfactory
B.5.j. Relationships with Authorities and Agencies
Evaluate the quality of the school’s relationships with local authorities and government agencies.
X
X Exceeds Expectations
Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 29
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
PROFILE OF STUDENT PERFORMANCE
he Profile of Student Performance includes the following information and data
that describe the levels of student performance on assessments that are most
respected by the members of the school’s community of stakeholders, valued by
the school’s professional staff, and/or required by the state or federal governments. The
Profile includes:
Data for standardized academic assessments.
Data for school-based academic assessments.
Data for achievement indicators such as graduation rate, college rigorous
courses, college acceptance, etc.
Data for citizenship measures such as attendance, promptness, discipline, etc.
Data for state academic assessments, if applicable.
Collecting and tracking data that describe how well the school’s students are
performing in the areas that are normally used by the school’s community of
stakeholders to determine if the school is accomplishing its mission is important for the
following reasons:
The school needs these data to determine if it is making progress toward
achieving its mission;
The school needs these data to determine if its graduates are meeting the
expectations expressed in the school’s Profile of Graduates;
The school needs these data to help it determine in which areas of student
performance there are the largest gaps between what is expected and how
students are performing and, therefore, what the focus of the school’s Plan for
Growth and Improvement should be.
A. ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE DATA—PUBLIC
SCHOOLS
X We are not subject to the provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act.
T
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 30
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B. ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE DATA—ALL SCHOOLS
B.1. Results of Standardized Academic Assessments
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2012 -- 2013
Name of
Assessment
Sub-Group of
Students
Grade
Level(s)
Percentage of Student
Performance[2]
Terra Nova All 2 Reading - 72
Math - 59
Above
Standard
2 Reading - 27
Math - 38
At
Standard
2 Reading - 1
Math - 3
Below
Standard
3 Reading - 65
Language - 72
Math - 76
Science - 76.4
Social Studies - 82.25
Above
Standard
3 Reading - 35
Language - 28
Math - 23
Science - 23.6
Social Studies - 17.75
At
Standard
3 Reading - 0.2
Language - 0.8
Math - 0.8
Science - 0
Social Studies - 0
Below
Standard
4
Reading - 71
Language -51
Math - 69
Above
Standard
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 31
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Science - 63.8
Social Studies - 66
4 Reading - 27
Language - 47
Math - 29
Science - 36.4
Social Studies - 34
At
Standard
4 Reading - 1
Language - 1
Math - 2
Science - 0
Social Studies - 0
Below
Standard
5 Reading - 73
Language - 65
Math - 64
Science - 73
Social Studies - 52
Above
Standard
5 Reading - 26
Language - 33
Math - 36
Science - 27
Social Studies - 47.2
At
Standard
5 Reading - 0.3
Language - 2
Math - 0.2
Science - 0
Social Studies - 0.75
Below
Standard
6
Reading - 77
Language - 64
Math - 56
Science - 50.2
Social Studies - 62
Above
Standard
6 Reading - 23
Language - 36
At
Standard
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 32
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Math - 40
Science - 47
Social Studies - 38
6 Reading - 0
Language - 0
Math - 5
Science - 3.4
Social Studies - 0
Below
Standard
7
Reading - 71
Language - 65
Math - 70
Science - 52.5
Social Studies - 60.25
Above
Standard
7 Reading - 29
Language - 35
Math - 30
Science - 47.5
Social Studies- 40.25
At
Standard
7 Reading - 0
Language - 0
Math - 0
Science - 0
Social Studies - 0
Below
Standard
B.1.a. Provide a description of proposed improvements and/or corrective actions
that need to be taken for students performing below standard. Include a
description of actions that have been initiated or are formally planned.
When indicators show that students are below standard in reading or math, one or more of the
following occur:
1. Teacher applies classroom accommodations to meet the student’s needs.
2. A conference with the parents is requested.
3. IU services or private tutoring is recommended.
4. The student is referred for Child Study.
5. A school psychologist is consulted.
6. A follow up meeting is held to formulate an education plan.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 33
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B.2. Retention in Grade
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2012 -- 2013
Grade Level Percentage Retained in
Grade
All 0.2%
K 0.2%
B.3. Honor Roll Students in grades 7 and 8 may earn honors each trimester according to the following criteria:
First Honors: 95 or above in every subject area; 3 or 4 in Personal & Social Growth, Effort &
Study Skills, Special Subjects
Second Honors: 90 or above in every subject area
3 or 4 in Personal & Social Growth, Effort & Study Skills, Special Subjects
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2012 -- 2013
Grade 8 First Honors Second Honors
First Trimester 19% 14%
Second Trimester 9% 26%
Third Trimester 12% 19%
Grade 7 First Honors Second Honors
First Trimester 25% 18%
Second Trimester 15% 21%
Third Trimester 15% 25%
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 34
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B.4. GRADE POINT AVERAGE
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2012 -- 2013
Grade Level General Average
4-8 90.3
4 90.0
5 89.8
6 92.3
7 90.8
8 89.1
Scholarships Earned
From the class of 2013, 37% chose to attend diocesan high schools and 49% chose to attend private
Catholic high schools. Of those attending the private schools, 5 students received scholarship offers
amounting to $40,000 per year. Another student earned the Neumann Scholarship providing a yearly
renewable scholarship of $6,150 to the local diocesan high school. In addition to the solely academic
scholarships, three students were awarded scholarships based on leadership and character with attention
to financial need amounting to another $4,000 for the 13-14 school year.
D. CITIZENSHIP PERFORMANCE DATA—ALL SCHOOLS D.1. Attendance
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2012 -- 2013
Grade Level Percentage Absent 10 or More Days[3]
All 23%
K 36%
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 35
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
1 11%
2 18%
3 30%
4 18%
5 33%
6 10%
7 15%
8 34%
D.2. Tardiness FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2012 -- 2013
Grade Level Percentage Late to School 10 or More Days
All 23%
K 19%
1 20%
2 22%
3 19%
4 29%
5 33%
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 36
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
6 18%
7 21%
8 29%
As of September 2013, the school has instituted two morning drop off points in an attempt to
decrease the percentage of tardiness.
A school policy addressing excessive absence and/or tardiness will be established and clearly
communicated through student and parent handbook.
D.3. Suspensions from School
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2012 -- 2013
Grade Level Percentage Suspended
One or More Times
All 0.2%
Grade 6 2.6%
D.4. Expulsions
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2012 -- 2013
Grade Level Percentage Expelled
All 0%
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 37
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
THE SCHOOL’S MISSION,
BELIEFS, AND PROFILE OF GRADUATES
he foundation for an effective plan for improving student performance and the
organization's capacity to achieve the levels of performance desired and expected
is established by the school's Mission, Beliefs, and Profile of Graduates. These
foundational documents answer the following questions:
What is our vision for a better future for the children of our school?
What beliefs or core values will guide our journey?
What will our students have to know, be able to do, and to demonstrate for us to achieve
our mission?
A. MISSION
A school’s Mission should reflect the deepest desires of the school’s community of
stakeholders for what they want the school to become—its future in terms of what it
will do for its students. The mission expresses what the adults in the school community
commit themselves to doing for the benefit of the students.
A mission statement should describe in broad and visionary terms what the school is
striving to become. A mission should be outcome-based, providing clarity regarding the
school’s audience (whom it serves), its action (what it commits to doing for its
audience), its aim (the purposes for which it exists) and its means (how, in broad terms,
it will its purposes).
While it is not appropriate for a Visiting Team to determine whether the school’s
Mission is the right or wrong Mission for the school or a good or bad Mission, nor is it
appropriate for the Team to require changes to the Mission.
A Visiting Team will, however, offer an objective perspective regarding whether any
elements of the Mission are unclear or seem inconsistent or incomplete or whether the
school and its community of stakeholders support and are “walking the talk” of the
Mission. However, it is up to the school to decide if the Team’s comments are legitimate
and relevant. It is in this spirit that the following observations are offered concerning
the school’s mission.
T
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 38
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
What is the school’s Mission?
"Through the Immaculate Heart of Mary, we at SS. Simon and Jude School commit ourselves to
learning, proclaiming and living the Good News of Jesus Christ. We strive to educate and
develop all for Catholic leadership in the church and community, enabling one another to serve
with compassion, courage and competence."
Who among the school's community of stakeholders was involved in the
development/revision/reaffirmation of the school's Mission?
The SS. Simon and Jude School planning team, which included Sister Jeannine Norton IHM,
Bernadette Langdon, John McGrath, Sue Rice, Eileen Snow, and Sara Van Alstyne, revised the
2011-2012 mission statement in the fall of 2013.
Provide a brief description of process used to develop/revise/reaffirm the school's
Mission.
The planning team members met several times to modify the school mission statement which had
been previously revised in the spring of 2012. The committee wanted the current mission
statement to emphasize commitment to Catholic education as well as incorporate the charism of
the Sisters, Servants of the Immaculate Heart of Mary who have served here since the foundation
in 1962.
The entire faculty and the students in grades five to eight were involved in the revision process.
Surveys were administered to the older students to assess their understanding and opinion of the
mission statement. The feedback and suggestions by the faculty and students were considered
and incorporated into the school mission statement by the planning team.
The school's mission is reaffirmed in numerous ways each school year. The faculty reviews the
statement at the orientation meeting in August, and the classroom teachers review it with their
students in September and October aligning it with the monthly peacemaker practice. The
mission statement is recited by the principal, teachers, and students in the morning assembly
every day. It is also displayed in the classrooms, on the school's website, in the faculty
handbook, in the parent/student handbook, in the weekly newsletters, at the open house
presentations, and at the bottom of the school letterhead.
B. BELIEFS
tatements of belief serve as the foundation of a strong strategic plan. They are the
formal expression of a school’s fundamental values and serve as its ethical code.
Beliefs describe the moral character of a school. In a planning process involving S
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 39
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
diverse stakeholder groups, they represent the composite of the personal values held by
individual planning team members.
Because beliefs are a matter of faith, not a matter of fact, they express the school’s
overriding convictions, its inviolate commitments. They outline what members of the
school’s community of stakeholders are willing to “go to the mat” defending. Because
beliefs identify the “line in the sand,” they can be used as a lens through which to
examine the worthiness of the school’s potential decisions or future actions.
Only members of the school community can identify their deeply held beliefs. A
Visiting Team can, however, offer an objective perspective on what is unclear or seems
inconsistent or incomplete in the school’s Beliefs. Ultimately, however, it is the school
that has to decide if the Team’s comments are legitimate and relevant. It is in this spirit
that the following observations on the school’s Beliefs are made.
What are the school’s Beliefs?
1. We believe we are called to serve and witness the Gospel message of Jesus Christ and
His church.
2. We believe in fostering a welcoming community in an environment rooted in the Good
News of Jesus Christ.
3. We believe that the I.H.M. charism of love, creative hope and fidelity is a gift to all those
who are joined in this apostolic mission.
4. We believe in developing Catholic leaders who are growing in their relationship with
God the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.
5. We believe in academic excellence guided by core curriculum standards and enhanced
with updated technology.
6. We believe in a rigorous and relevant curriculum to equip all students with the spiritual,
intellectual and personal skills needed for 21st century challenges.
Who among the school's community of stakeholders was involved in the
development/revision/reaffirmation of the school's Beliefs?
The belief statements were revised by the planning team members in the fall of 2013, the year
the Middle States Re-accreditation Study began.
Provide a brief description of the process used to develop/revise/reaffirm the school's
Beliefs.
The planning team met twice to consider and revise the version of the school beliefs that had
been adopted in 2012. The first task was rearranging the order in which the beliefs were listed.
It was obvious to the steering committee that our belief in being called to serve and witness the
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 40
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Gospel message of Jesus should be the first one listed. It was also essential to include a statement
about fostering a welcoming community since there is a proactive stance in nurturing a positive
relationship among students, faculty and parents at the school. In addition, the team felt it was
important to include beliefs which focused on academic excellence with a rigorous and relevant
curriculum that prepares students for the diverse challenges of this century.
The committee presented a draft of these Beliefs to the faculty in January 2014 at which time
they were affirmed and adopted.
As part of a continuous process, the Beliefs will be presented to all stakeholders for affirmation
through the Parent/Student Handbook. They will be reaffirmed at the opening of school liturgy
and through the monthly peacemaker practice.
C. PROFILE OF GRADUATES
he Profile of Graduates provides the answer to the following question: When our
students have completed our entire educational program and have had the
benefit of the services and activities provided by the institution and its
community:
What do we expect them to know?
What do we expect them to be able to do with what they know?
What qualities or characteristics do we want them to demonstrate?
A Profile of Graduates
describes the students at the point of exit from the institution.
states the values, achievement, and readiness that each student will manifest
upon graduation.
should be considered both as a Bill of Rights and set of corresponding
responsibilities for students, faculty, staff, administration, and the institution’s
community.
defines the outcomes each and every student will attain if the mission is
operative and appropriately translated into programs and services.
A Profile of Graduates serves to
translate the identity, vision, and values expressed in the beliefs and mission into
statements that describe student outcomes.
translate and transform concepts from the ideal and global to specific expression
in the development of a student in the institution.
T
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 41
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
give expression to what the mission means in the operational life of the
institution.
define an outline or shape each student is expected to grow into regardless of
specific courses taken or post-graduation plans.
a concrete reference point for faculty, staff, and the institution’s community
when designing curriculum, instructional experiences, service programs,
auxiliary resources, and student and family services.
What is the school’s Profile of Graduates?
The graduates of SS. Simon and Jude School, supported by their parents, teachers, and friends
are defined as people of Courage, Compassion, and Competence.
SS. Simon and Jude Graduates demonstrate Courage when they
participate actively in the faith and worship life of the church.
assume a stance of prayer that bespeaks reverence.
are peacemakers, modeling the Gospel values.
speak up for the rights of others.
take ownership of weaknesses and mistakes and seek reconciliation and renewal.
express opinions with honesty and respect.
strive for self-discipline, a positive self-image and responsibility for personal choices.
SS. Simon and Jude Graduates demonstrate Compassion when they
demonstrate a Christ-like manner in all social interactions.
include all with a welcoming and affirming spirit.
respond to the feelings and needs of others with genuine concern.
model stewardship by giving their time, talent and treasure for the good of others.
assist the poor, the elderly, the sick, and the vulnerable with generosity and empathy.
care diligently for all creation.
SS. Simon and Jude Graduates demonstrate Competence when they
understand the facts and moral values of our Catholic Faith and apply them in life choices
recognize and appreciate God-given talents and use them for the benefit of the Church
and community.
allow all learning to lead to a greater understanding of God's world and His people.
possess the academic skills to succeed in high school and beyond.
think critically, communicate effectively and work collaboratively.
use technological tools with ease and moral integrity.
pursue their highest potential by valuing educational experiences as a lifelong learner.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 42
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Who among the school's community of stakeholders was involved in the
development/revision/reaffirmation of the school's Profile of Graduates?
The SS. Simon and Jude School's planning team, which included Sister Jeannine Norton IHM,
Bernadette Langdon, John McGrath, Sue Rice, Eileen Snow, and Sara Van Alstyne, developed
the current Profile of Graduates in January of 2014. The faculty further reviewed and revised it
on January 20, 2014. The current eighth grade will be afforded the opportunity to reflect on this
profile during their closing retreat day.
Provide a brief description of the process used to develop/revise/reaffirm the school's
Profile of Graduates.
The Planning Team researched and evaluated Profiles of Graduates from other schools. In
committee meetings, it was agreed that it would be more unified if the Profile incorporated the
three prongs of the Mission Statement (Courage, Compassion, and Competence). Over the
course of several sessions, the steering committee created a version of the Profile which was
presented to the faculty on January 20, 2014 when it was further refined.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 43
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
THE PROFILE OF ORGANIZATIONAL CAPACITY
he Profile of Organizational Capacity provides information and data that portray
the school’s capacity to produce the levels of student performance the school and
its community of stakeholders desire and expect. The Profile consists of the
results of a self-assessment of the school’s adherence to the Middle States Standards for
Accreditation.
The twelve Standards for Accreditation reflect research-based best practices for quality
in schools. The Standards also represent the organizational “building blocks” that need
to be in place to produce high levels of student performance. The self-assessment leads
to identifying the school’s strengths and areas in need of improvement.
The Profile also provides those responsible for developing the school’s Plan for Growth
and Improvement with a good understanding of the current status of the school.
Standards for Accreditation for Schools: Elementary, Middle, High, and
PreK-12 Institutions
Foundational Standards: Standards addressing best practices in the components of a
school that provide the foundations for quality in the education program, services,
and results in terms of student learning.
Standard 1: Philosophy/Mission
Standard 2: Governance and Leadership
Standard 3: School Improvement Planning
Standard 4: Finances
Standard 5: Facilities
Standard 6: School Climate and Organization
Operational Standards: Standards addressing best practices in delivering the
education program, services, and activities to the students.
Standard 7: Health and Safety
Standard 8: Educational Program
Standard 9: Assessment and Evidence of Student Learning
Standard 10: Student Services
Standard 11: Student Life and Student Activities
T
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 44
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Standard 12: Information Resources and Technology
Method(s) Used to Conduct the Self-Assessment of Adherence to the
Standards for Accreditation
A. By Standards Surveys
X YES NO The self-assessment was conducted using the surveys
provided by the Middle States Association.
Total Number of Surveys
Returned 298
The results represent surveys
completed by
Students X
Parents X
Faculty and Staff X
Administrators X
Board Members X
Business/Community
Representative
B. By a Committee
YES X NO The self-assessment was conducted by a committee
for all the Standards.
**NOTE: Committee size and composition may vary depending upon the school’s size, the
topic to be addressed, etc. If needed, add lines to the above chart.
If the school used a single committee to conduct the self-assessment, explain below
how all of the school’s community of stakeholders were given opportunities to
provide input into the self-assessment.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 45
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
PHILOSOPHY/MISSION STANDARD FOR
ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related To This Standard
The following requirements ask the school to provide a self-assessment of expectations
for quality included in this Standard for Accreditation. The information and data
requested in this section are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and
data assist the school in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and
its Indicators of Quality.
A.1. List the people who participated in the most recent development/review of the
philosophy/mission and the stakeholder group each participant represents.
Name Stakeholder Group Sr. Jeannine Norton I.H.M. Administrators
John McGrath Faculty and Staff
Eileen Snow Faculty and Staff
Sara Van Alstyne Faculty and Staff
Bernadette Langdon Faculty and Staff
Sue Rice Parent
A.2. List the date(s) of the most recent revision/adoption of the school's
philosophy/mission.
Fall, 2013
A.3. By what body was the most recent revision/adoption of the school's
philosophy/mission approved>
Students in grades five to eight and the faculty were involved in the revision process and the
most recent revision of the school’s mission was approved by the administration and faculty.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 46
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A43. Indicate where the philosophy/mission is formally published.
The faculty reviews the mission statement at the orientation meeting in August, and the
classroom teachers review it with their students in September and October, aligning it with the
monthly peacemaker practice. The principal, teachers, and students recite the mission statement
in the morning assembly every day. It is also displayed in the classrooms, on the school's
website, in the faculty handbook, parent/student handbook, weekly newsletters, the open-house
presentations, and at the bottom of the school letterhead.
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school does not meet the
expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school partially meets the
expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school meets the expectations
of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school exceeds the expectations
of this Indicator
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard 1:
Philosophy/Mission
The Standard: The school has a clearly written and actively implemented statement
of philosophy/mission that conveys the general and specific purposes of its educational
program, expresses expectations for quality, and serves as the basis for daily
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 47
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
operational and instructional decision making as well as long-range planning.
Stakeholders give input into the development of the school’s philosophy/mission and
understand and accept it. This document is aligned with the community served and is
reviewed periodically by stakeholder representatives.
1.1. – 1.5: Indicators for all schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
1.1 The school takes steps to ensure that students and
their families understand and support the school’s
philosophy/mission.
X
1.2 The philosophy/mission is free of contradiction,
ambiguity, and excessive abstraction. X
1.3 The philosophy/mission is consistent with ethical
norms and demonstrates respect for persons of all
races, creeds, and cultures.
X
1.4 The school implements a system to assess its
effectiveness in fulfilling its philosophy/mission. X
1.5 The school’s philosophy/mission is clearly
communicated in its brochures, promotional
materials, policy and procedural handbooks, web
site, and similar resources.
X
Other:
1.6 – 1.8: Indicators for faith-based schools2
These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
2 The use of the Faith-Based Indicators for this and the other Standards for Accreditation by faith-based
schools is voluntary and not required, unless their use is directed by the head of a parent school system
such as a Diocesan/Archdiocesan or a similar system of schools. The Faith-Based Indicators allow faith-
based schools, if they desire, to include in their self-study and accreditation process Indicators of Quality
that address unique characteristics of and expectations for schools whose mission and educational
program are defined wholly or in part by their particular faith.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 48
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
1.6 The school’s religious identity is articulated
clearly in the school’s mission, beliefs and
publications.
X
1.7 The school’s religious identity is integrated into its
philosophy/mission and its school-wide goals and
objectives.
X
1.8 Symbols and artifacts of the school community’s
faith are visible in the school. X
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings: Below are listed positive comments that were echoed by the three main stakeholder groups.
The School’s mission is written clearly and there are symbols of the Catholic faith
throughout the school.
The presence of faith-filled teachers and administrators is evident in their ordinary,
everyday work.
The students are becoming more aware of the mission by stating it each day in morning
assembly.
Analyses of the student surveys as well as classroom discussion of the mission statement indicate
a need for further clarification. Some Faculty comments suggest a need for a more systematic
mean to assess ongoing compliance with the Mission.
B.2. Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
N/A...a rating of 1 was not received in any of the indicators of quality
C. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 49
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
D. Root Cause Analysis
Foundational Issue: Philosophy/Mission
Are there philosophy/mission
standard indicators not met or in
need of improvement that inhibit
the attainment of the
organizational capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion:
100% of stakeholders agree that the standard has
been met
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Based on survey results and evidence obtained by
committee
E. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the Philosophy/Mission
Standard.
The students and faculty recite the mission statement daily.
The mission statement is communicated in multiple venues, making it more visible to all.
The focus on compassion, courage and competence makes the mission statement more
concrete and attainable.
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
Philosophy/Mission Standard.
Continue to teach and reinforce the mission statement and its connection to the school’s
faith community.
Clarify and refine the systems for assessing our implementation of the mission statement
in daily activities.
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to Philosophy/Mission that
should be included in the action plan in the Plan for Growth and
Improvement.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 50
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Align Peacemaker of the Month virtues with the mission statement and beliefs.
Reinforce the application of the monthly practice during morning assembly scripture
reflection
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard
Evidence School The school’s philosophy/mission X
Samples of publications that communicate the mission/philosophy to
the school’s community of stakeholders X
Marketing, recruitment, and admissions materials X
Address of the school’s website www.simonandjude.org
Policies related to the philosophy/mission X
Practice of the Month Plan for 14-15 based on the Mission and
Beliefs X
Survey Results X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 51
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
GOVERNANCE AND LEADERSHIP STANDARD FOR
ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related To This Standard
The following requirements ask the school to provide a self-assessment of expectations
for quality included in this Standard for Accreditation.
TO BE COMPLETED BY INDEPENDENT, RELIGIOUS, AND
PROPRIETARY SCHOOLS
1. Is the school incorporated? Yes
X No
If yes, Name of Corporation:
2. Is the school licensed to operate as an
educational school?
X Yes
No
If yes,
In what state(s) is the school licensed to
operate?
Pennsylvania
In what country(ies) is the school
licensed to operate?
United States
If no, explain the school’s authority to
operate:
3. Is the school licensed to grant
diplomas or certificates?
X Yes
No
If yes,
In what state(s) is the school licensed to
grant diplomas or certificates?
Pennsylvania
Type(s) of diplomas or certificates
offered
Elementary Diploma
If no, explain the school’s authority to
grant diplomas or certificates:
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 52
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
For religious schools:
Religious Affiliation: Roman Catholic
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school does not meet the
expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school partially meets the
expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school meets the expectations
of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school exceeds the expectations
of this Indicator
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 53
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard 2:
Governance and Leadership
The Standard: The school is chartered, licensed, or authorized by a state, nation, or
authority that operates in the public interest. The governance and leadership ensure the
integrity, effectiveness, and reputation of the school through the establishment of
policy, provision of resources, and assurance of a quality educational program. The
governance and leadership act ethically and consistently to assure an atmosphere of
mutual respect and purposeful effort on behalf of students and their learning. School
leaders foster a productive environment for teaching and learning, timely and open
communication with stakeholders, and the vision necessary for day-to-day operations
and long-term planning.
2.1 – 2.17: Indicators for schools that are not part of a public school
district, archdiocesan/diocesan system, corporation, or other
school organization with a central office staff
X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
2.18 – 2.38: Indicators for schools that are part of a public school district,
archdiocesan/diocesan system, corporation, or other school
organization with a central office staff
These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
Governance
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
2.18 The school is in compliance with all applicable
statutes, ordinances, and regulations of all civil
authorities of the jurisdiction in which the school
is located.
X
2.19 No legal or proprietary ambiguities in ownership,
control, or responsibility exist. Partnerships and
any corporate linkages in ownership/governance
are expressed as enforceable agreements.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 54
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
2.20 The governance works cooperatively to establish
and maintain clearly formulated written policies
and procedures that are consistent with the
school’s philosophy/mission. The policies and
procedures are implemented and reviewed
regularly.
X
2.21 The governance provides appropriate
opportunities for education of the trustees/board,
including orientation and training sessions so that
all members understand their responsibilities and
roles.
N/A N/A N/A N/A
2.22 The governance appropriately recognizes the
accomplishments of the staff and students. X
2.23 The governance provides the school with effective
leadership, support, and continuity, including
succession planning to ensure stability of the
school leadership.
X
2.24 The governance thinks and acts strategically,
reflecting on its decisions and the consequences of
its actions.
X
2.25 The governance implements a system for
evaluating its own effectiveness in performing its
duties.
X
2.26 The governance focuses its activities on selecting,
evaluating, and supporting the head of the school
system, policy development, planning, assessing
the organization’s performance, and ensuring
adequate resources to accomplish the
organization’s philosophy/mission.
X
2.27 Governance refrains from undermining the
authority of the leadership to conduct the daily
operation of the school system.
X
2.28 The governance utilizes a clearly defined
performance appraisal system for the head of the
school system. The appraisal is conducted with
the knowledge and participation of the head of
the organization.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 55
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
Other:
Central Office Leadership
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
2.29 The head of the school system is accountable to
the governance and is responsible for ensuring
expected levels of student performance.
X
2.30 The central office leadership ensures that all
school system programs and activities are
adequately and appropriately planned,
supervised, resourced, and staffed with qualified
personnel.
X
2.31 The central office leadership stays well informed
of educational developments. X
2.32 The central office leadership adheres to
appropriate guidelines concerning confidentiality
in communications.
X
Other:
School Leadership
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
2.33 The school leadership maintains appropriate and
constructive relations with families, students,
staff, the community, and with each other in the
interest of serving the needs of the students.
X
2.34 The school leadership undertakes operational,
long range, and strategic planning aimed at
accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
X
2.35 The head of the school is accountable to the
governance and is responsible for ensuring
expected levels of student performance.
X
2.36 The school leadership ensures that all school X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 56
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
programs and activities are adequately and
appropriately planned, supervised, resourced,
and staffed with qualified personnel.
2.37 The school leadership ensures that members of the
professional and support staffs stay well informed
of educational developments.
X
2.38 The school leadership adheres to appropriate
guidelines concerning confidentiality in
communications.
X
Other:
2.39: Indicator for schools that provide distance education
X This Indicator is not applicable to our school.
2.40– 2.47: Indicators for faith-based schools3
These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
2.40 The governance and leadership articulate and
model the religious tenets of the school. X
2.41 Maintaining the religious identity of the school is a
priority of the administration. X
2.42 Policies, procedures and decisions of the
governing body and leadership are based in and
informed by the religious values and identity of
the school.
X
2.43 Leadership accepts the authority of the sponsoring X
3 The use of the Faith-Based Indicators for this and the other Standards for Accreditation by faith-based
schools is voluntary and not required, unless their use is directed by the head of a parent school system
such as a Diocesan/Archdiocesan or a similar system of schools. The Faith-Based Indicators allow faith-
based schools, if they desire, to include in their self-study and accreditation process Indicators of Quality
that address unique characteristics of and expectations for schools whose mission and educational
program are defined wholly or in part by their particular faith.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 57
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
religious institution.
2.44 Planning and decision-making by the governance
and leadership engages the school community in
setting direction and ensuring the future of the
school as a faith-based institution.
X
2.45 Criteria for hiring the school’s leadership include
an assessment of the candidates’ understanding
and commitment to the religious beliefs and
mission of the school.
N/A N/A
*
N/A
at
this
time
N/A
2.46 Governance and leadership promote respect and
collaboration among all members of the school's
"faith" community.
X
2.47 Attention is given to building a respectful and
collaborative "faith" community among the faculty
and staff.
X
Other:
* The principal is assigned to the school by the Sisters, Servants of the Immaculate Heart of
Mary
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings Although 39% of the staff rated the average of the indicators a “4” and 58% rated it “3”, the fact
that several student comments and one faculty member indicated that the governance/leadership
does not give sufficient recognition to student and staff accomplishments is a matter to be
considered and addressed.
Although 68% rated the average of the indicators a “4,” 6% rated it with a “1” or “2.” While it is
acknowledged that families have varying experiences, comments such as: “The pastor and
principal have not been effective in addressing issues presented to them” are notable and need to
be addressed.
B.2. Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 58
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
C. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
D. Root Cause Analysis
Foundational Issue: Governance and Leadership
Are there governance and
leadership standard indicators not
met or in need of improvement that
inhibit the attainment of the
organizational capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
E. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the Governance and
Leadership Standard.
The pastor and principal, supported by the Finance and Pastoral Councils, work
cooperatively to lead the school in adherence to the Mission Statement.
The principal and pastor sit on the Finance and Pastoral Councils receiving advice from
them and keeping them informed of the school’s activities and progress.
The pastor responds to all requests for his input and presence.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 59
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
The principal is a member of a religious community and sees her role as a ministry. She
sincerely seeks to lead with generosity and dedication to high standards in all areas.
The leadership style of the principal is collaborative which helps to instill a strong sense
of ownership among all.
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
Governance and Leadership Standard.
According to survey data, there do not appear to be areas of overwhelming concern for
improvements in school governance and leadership. However, while the individuals who
fulfill these positions are well-credentialed and dedicated to continuing educational
opportunities, stakeholder comments suggest a need for more prompt and definitive
handling of issues.
The governance and leadership will continue to improve communication. They will focus
on student accomplishments and recognizing them with greater consistency.
The governance and leadership will aim to improve the scope and breadth of information
across all parish entities. They will use 21st century technology, meetings and current
avenues of communication. In so doing, stakeholders will be more aware of the
processes and protocols that are followed in the governance of the school.
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to Governance and
Leadership that should be included in the action plan in the Plan for Growth
and Improvement.
The governance and leadership will continue to assure a quality educational program by
implementing the recommended archdiocesan curriculum, by supporting sound financial
decisions, and by striving to ensure enrollment stability.
The governance and leadership will continue to facilitate communication among all
stakeholders.
The governance and leadership will work more closely with The Chester County
Advisory Council for Elementary Schools.
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard
Evidence School Job descriptions for the head of the institution and other key administrative
personnel X
Appraisal tool and/or description of the process used to appraise the performance of
the head of the institution X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 60
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Evidence School Chart of lines of authority/responsibilities X
Policies related to governance and leadership X
For independent, non-public, and proprietary institutions only
Financial Focus Parts I, II and III distributed to the parish and school families. X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 61
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING STANDARD FOR
ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related To This Standard
The following requirements ask the school to provide a self-assessment of expectations
for quality included in this Standard for Accreditation. The information and data
requested in this section are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and
data assist the school in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and
its Indicators of Quality.
A.1. SCHOOL PLANS
Type of Plan Yes/No
Year Last
Reviewed/
Updated
Quality/Effectiveness
of Plan
Strategic Plan/Long-
Range Plan X
Middle States
Action Plan last
reviewed in
2010.
The diocese
encourages an
annual strategic
plan
X Satisfactory
Needs
Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Financial Plan X Annually in
September at
Finance Council
X Satisfactory
Needs
Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Facilities Plan X Twice per year,
September and
January
X Satisfactory
Needs
Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Technology Plan X Will be formally
constructed
Satisfactory
X Needs
Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Professional
Development Plan X
Annually in
conjunction with
CCIU and OCE
Satisfactory
X Needs
Improvement
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 62
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Type of Plan Yes/No
Year Last
Reviewed/
Updated
Quality/Effectiveness
of Plan
Unsatisfactory
Staffing Policy
X
Annually with
teacher
evaluation and
hiring according
to OCE
recommendations
X Satisfactory
Needs
Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Marketing Plan X
Annually at first
Marketing
Committee
Meeting
X Satisfactory
Needs
Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Curriculum
Review/Revision Plan X
Annually in
conjunction with
OCE
X Satisfactory
Needs
Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Student Enrollment
Policy X
Annually with
the Marketing
Committee and
Finance Council
X Satisfactory
Needs
Improvement
Unsatisfactory
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 63
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard 3:
School Improvement Planning
The Standard: The school uses a collaborative process to develop and implement a
written strategic or long-range plan to improve its educational program and services.
Plans are aligned with the school’s philosophy/mission and its operational plans, and
are focused on continuous improvement of student performance, staff professional and
organizational growth.
3.1– 3.8: Indicators for all schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
3.1 The school’s improvement plans are developed
with broad-based school community participation
and input.
X
3.2 Information about the school’s planning
processes, its improvement plans and goals, and
the results of implementing the improvement
plans are communicated to stakeholders and the
public.
X
3.3 Improvement plans are supported by the school
community and approved by the governance
where appropriate.
X
3.4 Periodic external reviews validate the school’s
processes for strategic or long-range planning and
school improvement.
X
3.5 The school can document its long-range planning
for finances, facilities, and technology
enhancement.
X
3.6 Improvement plans are based on an analysis of X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 64
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
historical data, baseline performance information,
trend data, and projections.
3.7 The school’s improvement plans are reviewed
periodically to determine the extent to which
outcomes meet expectations so that corrective
actions can be taken as needed.
X
3.8 Planners consider the capacities of its facilities,
equipment, and staff before adopting new
programs.
X
Other:
3.9: Indicator for faith-based schools4 This Indicator is not applicable to our school.
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
3.9 The spiritual life of the community is a priority in
all planning activities. X
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
All stakeholder groups clearly rated SSJ as meeting this Standard although our Parents rated 3.1
and 3.2 with a “4” for exceeds expectations. The following parent comment exemplifies this.
There is always time for parents' questions at HSA meetings. One feels as though
questions (even difficult or challenging ones) are welcome.
B.2. Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
See MSA Survey Results/Comments
4 The use of the Faith-Based Indicators for this and the other Standards for Accreditation by faith-based
schools is voluntary and not required, unless their use is directed by the head of a parent school system
such as a Diocesan/Archdiocesan or a similar system of schools. The Faith-Based Indicators allow faith-
based schools, if they desire, to include in their self-study and accreditation process Indicators of Quality
that address unique characteristics of and expectations for schools whose mission and educational
program are defined wholly or in part by their particular faith.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 65
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
C. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
D. Root Cause Analysis
Foundational Issue: School Improvement Planning
Are there school improvement
planning standard indicators not
met or in need of improvement that
inhibit the attainment of the
organizational capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
E. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the School Improvement
Planning Standard.
Long range planning for improvements to the school remains on-going. The Faculty works as a
team to identify and address improvement needs in curriculum areas while the Parish Manager
and Principal are continuously assessing and addressing needs related to the physical plant and
resources. Sr. Jeannine, school principal, communicates with the Parents through weekly
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 66
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
newsletters, website postings, and thrice annual oral reports presented at each Home and School
meeting. Students are informed of daily, weekly, and long-range events at morning assembly.
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
School Improvement Planning Standard. While SS. Simon and Jude School tends to be up-to-date with the latest technology in many
ways, it would be beneficial to have a technology plan in place, including the financial aspect of
that plan, to ensure that technology for all staff and students continues to be updated and kept
current.
At times, the school's plan for improvements has needed to be adjusted based on finances.
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to School Improvement
Planning that should be included in the action plan in the Plan for Growth
and Improvement.
A technology plan, including long-range financial planning, will be developed and implemented
for both staff and students.
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard
Evidence School Strategic and/or long-range plan Development/institutional advancement plan Enrollment plan Policies related to school improvement planning
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 67
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
FINANCES STANDARD FOR ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related to this Standard
A.1. For Publicly-Funded Schools
X This section is not applicable to our school.
A.2. For Non-Public, Independent And Proprietary Schools
This section is not applicable to our school.
A.2.a. FINANCIAL RESOURCES:
INCOME SOURCE
Current Year
Last Year
% from tuition 91% 88.4%
% from fees 5.2% 6.5%
% from fund-raising and other special
Activities 2% 2.3%
% from annual giving
% from grants
% from interest/investments/rental income 0.04% 0.4%
% other After School 1.8% 2.3%
TOTAL 99.9% 99.5%
A.2.b. ANNUAL PER PUPIL COSTS:
PER PUPIL
COSTS
Current
Academic
Year
Last
Academic
Year
Kindergarten $5,400 $5,300
Elementary
School Grades 1
to 8
$5,400 $5,300
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 68
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A.2.c. INSURANCE FOR THE SCHOOL:
Adequacy of Coverage
TYPE OF
INSURANCE Satisfactory
Needs
Improvement Unsatisfactory
Property liability X
Employee liability X
Administration
liability
X
Governing body
liability
X
Theft, fraud, deceit X
Tuition increase X
Travel and field trips X
Institution-owned
vehicles
X
Other (describe): We are self-insured under the
Archdiocese.
Certificate of Insurance is
available.
A.3. Provide a description of proposed improvements and/or corrective actions that
need to be taken if a rating of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” is
assigned. Include a description of actions that have been initiated or are
formally planned.
A.4. Indicate any anticipated major capital expenditures within the next three
years. The main office will be moved near the front entrance. An additional wall will be installed to create a larger reception area, but one that is closed
off from the rest of the school to hinder immediate access. The phone, PA system, door buzzers and monitors will be upgraded when the offices are
moved.
The current office will be reconfigured to create a conference room. The school is not ADA compliant but addressing this is in a long range plan which could
be 3 years but could be longer. Projects will be accomplished as funds are available.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 69
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard 4:
Finances
The Standard: Financial resources are sufficient to provide the educational
opportunities defined in the school’s philosophy/mission. The business practices of the
school are ethical. These practices promote confidence in the school’s ability to manage
fiscal and material resources in a responsible manner and follow prescribed budgeting
and accounting principles. The majority of resources raised for school purposes is
dedicated to the school’s operations.
4.1 – 4.12: Indicators for all schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
4.1 The school implements written financial policies
and procedures that are in accordance with
accepted business practices.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 70
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
4.2 The governance and leadership exercise prudent
control over all financial operations. X
4.3 Levels of income and expenditures are in
appropriate balance. Current assets are sufficient
to meet current liabilities.
X
4.4 Finances are currently stable and projections
indicate continuing stability. X
4.5 The school develops short- and long-range
financial plans to ensure resources are available to
deliver its educational program and services.
X
4.6 Stakeholders have opportunities to provide input
into financial plans. The staff is involved in
determining priorities for curriculum and
instructional needs.
X
4.7 Families enrolling students in the school are
informed in advance of all financial obligations for
attending the school.
X
4.8 Those entrusted with overseeing and conducting
the financial and business operations of the school
possess appropriate qualifications.
X
4.9 Periodic audits or financial reviews are conducted
by qualified external agencies and the school
responds appropriately.
X
4.10 The school has written, reasonable, and equitable
tuition, collection, and refund policies. X
4.11 The school carries adequate insurance coverage
including business interruption, casualty,
property, and liability insurance for employees
and the governance/owner, as appropriate.
X
4.12 The school makes prudent use of resources
available through development activities, grants,
foundations, and other partnerships.
X
Other:
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 71
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
4.13 – 4.15: Indicators for faith-based schools5
These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
4.13 The governance provides financial resources
necessary to support and enhance the religious
nature of the school.
X
4.14 The governance makes judicious use of financial
resources based on the religious values of the
school.
X
4.15 Institutional advancement efforts are supported
by the governance, leadership, staff, parents, and
alumni.
X
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
Most stakeholders indicated on their survey that financial resources are sufficient to
provide the educational opportunities defined in the school’s philosophy/mission. The
business practices of the school are ethical. These practices promote confidence in the
school’s ability to manage fiscal and material resources in a responsible manner and
follow prescribed budgeting and accounting principles.
Stakeholders indicated concern for impact of declining enrollment on the ability of the
school to provide sufficient capital to fund the educational programs.
Stakeholders indicated a desire for the school to continue to improve its communication
of student scholarships and other opportunities for financial assistance.
B.2. Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
5 The use of the Faith-Based Indicators for this and the other Standards for Accreditation by faith-based
schools is voluntary and not required, unless their use is directed by the head of a parent school system
such as a Diocesan/Archdiocesan or a similar system of schools. The Faith-Based Indicators allow faith-
based schools, if they desire, to include in their self-study and accreditation process Indicators of Quality
that address unique characteristics of and expectations for schools whose mission and educational
program are defined wholly or in part by their particular faith.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 72
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
C. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
D. Root Cause Analysis
Foundational Issue: Finances
Are there finances standard
indicators not met or in need of
improvement that inhibit the
attainment of the organizational
capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
E. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the Finances Standard.
The school is a recipient of financial support from the stewardship of the parish. SS.
Simon and Jude Parish demonstrates a commitment to stewardship through the leadership
of its pastor, finance council and other parish leaders. The parish warmly welcomes
individual participation in parish life, which is evidenced by an abundance of committed
volunteers. The parish exhibits vibrant spiritual, social, and outreach activities.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 73
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Although there is no separate School Advisory Board, the Parish Finance Council takes
seriously a commitment to review trends and plan for financial stability for the school.
Their goal is to be proactive in envisioning the structure of the school in the next five to
ten years. They are anxious to work with the Chester County Advisory Board to see the
broader picture and help ensure sustainable venues for Catholic education in the county.
In addition to being a recipient of the Archdiocesan EITC scholarship partner, BLOCS
(Business Leaders Organized for Catholic Schools), SS. Simon and Jude also receives
EITC scholarship assistance through the Advisory Council of Chester County, the
Henkels Foundation and Bridge Foundation.
In order to address the financial needs of those who may not meet foundation criteria or
who apply after those funds have been exhausted, SS. Simon and Jude established their
own Catholic Education Fund which is also a source of tuition assistance for families.
This endeavor is made possible by parishioner and other benefactor contributions.
SS. Simon and Jude Home and School Association raises funds each year. They cover the
cost of annual needs as well as any additional needs requested during the year. At the
end of the year, after having met all expenses for that year, a donation is made toward the
SSJ scholarship fund.
In the school year 2011-2012, an estate donation was earmarked for technology and a
separate technology fund was created.
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
Finances Standard.
A more concrete, strategic plan to maintain and even increase enrollment in the middle
school is needed.
A formalized development program and director could engage alumni and other
community members to support an annual fund to ensure a consistent source of funding
apart from tuition. This program director would also assist in recruiting and retention.
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to Finances that should be
included in the action plan in the Plan for Growth and Improvement.
The Parish Finance Council will continue to manage fiscal and material resources in a
responsible manner with a goal to reduce the parish subsidy to the school while still
keeping tuition at a reasonable rate.
The school will distribute information via the Sunday bulletin or will inform parishioners
through other means to ensure all school families receive the information. The goal is to
better communicate the role of the Finance Council and its relationship in supporting the
school.
The chair of the Finance Council or designee will be invited to address a general Home &
School meeting to further clarify its role and answer questions.
The school will continue to focus on marketing avenues, such as a vibrant and updated
website and more visibility of the Mission Statement on all publications. The school will
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 74
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
expand the use of “Exit Interviews” for students who are leaving the school prior to
graduation. These results will be analyzed to determine how to improve retention,
increase enrollment and thus strengthen the fiscal health of the school. Marketing
activities to improve enrollment at SSJ include
o formal visit days.
o Open Gym Day for those with younger children to use the gym weekly.
o contact with families of newly baptized children to establish ties with the school.
o greater attention to the needs and concerns of families new to the school.
The PREP Program will continue to be a supportive avenue for the dissemination of
information about the school and its mission.
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard
Evidence School Current operating budget (for main campus and each branch campus) X Certified external audit letter conducted within the last two years (for main campus
and each branch)
Student tuition and fee schedule (if applicable) X Long-range financial plan X Schedule of student tuition and fees (for non-public and proprietary institutions) X
Evidence that the institution has no contingent liabilities or on-going litigations that
potentially could affect the institution’s ability to continue operation X
List of grants and other funding sources obtained in the last calendar year X Publications provided to students outlining the families’ financial obligations X
Summary of the institution’s insurance coverage (for main campus and each
branch) X
Policies related to finances, financial aid, and refunds X
Agenda and Minutes of 13-14 Finance Council X Spreadsheet of Families (No Names) who received tuition assistance 13-14 X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 75
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
FACILITIES STANDARD FOR ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related To This Standard
The following requirements ask the school to provide a self-assessment of expectations
for quality included in this Standard for Accreditation. The information and data
requested in this section are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and
data assist the school in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and
its Indicators of Quality.
A.1. PHYSICAL FACILITIES.
Facility Location Year
Constructed
Most Recent
Renovation Ownership
Original School
Building
West Chester 1962 Summer, 2013
X Owned
Leased New School Wing
1991 Summer, 2013 X Owned
Leased Cavanaugh Hall
(Gym)
1970 Summer, 2010
X Owned
Leased Monihan Hall
(School/Parish)
1962 2013
X Owned
Leased
A.2. ADEQUACY OF FACILITIES.
BUILDINGS
Satisfactory Needs
Improvement Unsatisfactory
Not
Applicable
Main and New Wing X Gym X
Monihan Hall X
RESIDENTIAL
FACILITIES Satisfactory
Needs
Improvement Unsatisfactory
Not
Applicable Dormitories X
Sleeping rooms X
Common areas X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 76
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
RESIDENTIAL
FACILITIES Satisfactory
Needs
Improvement Unsatisfactory
Not
Applicable Dining areas X
Bathrooms X
Recreational areas X
Heating X
Lighting X
Ventilation X
Provisions for the
disabled (ADA) X
Cleanliness X
A.2.a.. Provide a description of proposed improvements and/or corrective actions that
need to be taken if a rating of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” is
assigned. Include a description of actions that have been initiated or are
formally planned.
A.3. MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING STAFF:
Type of Facilities Personnel Number Adequacy of Type and Number
Maintenance 3
X Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Clothing
X Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Grounds
X Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Other:
Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Other:
Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 77
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A.3.a. Provide a description of proposed improvements and/or corrective actions that
need to be taken if a rating of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” is
assigned. Include a description of actions that have been initiated or are
formally planned.
A.4. CONDITION OF FACILITIES.
Facility Satisfactory Needs
Improvement Unsatisfactory
Not
Applicable
School Building(s) X
Furnishings X
Provisions for the
Disabled X
Variety of Instructional
Spaces X
Laboratories X
Counseling/Guidance
Space(s) X
Health Services Space(s) X
Library/Learning Media
Center X
Administrative and
Support Spaces X
Offices and Planning
Spaces for the Faculty X
Heating, Ventilation, Air
Conditioning X
Electrical, Water, and
Sanitation Systems X
Energy Conservation
System X
Security System X
Storage Spaces X
Parking Spaces X
Athletic Fields X
Indoor Athletic Space(s) X
Cafeteria/Dining Space(s) X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 78
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Facility Satisfactory Needs
Improvement Unsatisfactory
Not
Applicable
Auditorium/Theater X
Dormitories X
Chapel X
A.4.a. Provide a description of proposed improvements and/or corrective actions that
need to be taken if a rating of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” is
assigned. Include a description of actions that have been initiated or are
formally planned.
ADA Compliance
The school and parish administration is mindful of the need for ADA modifications and the
relocation of the school’s administrative offices. These changes along with the HVAC upgrade
and electrical upgrade were bid in the summer of 2011. The entire scope of the project in 2011
dollars was $3,467,248.00. Breaking out the cost of ADA alterations including an elevator is
estimated at $423,000.00. The cost to relocate the administrative offices is $162,000. In the
summer of 2013 the school HVAC upgrade was completed at a cost of $1.7 million dollars. The
funds for the stated projects are from the Building for the Body of Christ Phase II Capital
Campaign. This campaign was started in 2009 and pledges are received over a five year period.
The rate of return over this five year period will determine the viability of the above stated
projects.
Security
Provisions for security are an ongoing effort. The school is committed to the constant evaluation
and improvement of the safety and security measures that are in place. A Security Committee
including Administration, Teachers, Parents, Local Police and members of the construction
trades is active in evaluating all procedures.
The following accomplishments in the 2013-2014 school year have taken place:
1. Maroon lanyards with identification cards worn by teachers
2. Yellow lanyards worn by visitors
3. Updated directions given for the reception desk volunteers
4. Walkie - talkies used for recess and outdoor P.E. classes
5. Updated floor plan for the school distributed to the main office, rectory, police and fire
departments.
6. Gathering points for evacuation designated, including the car dealership, church and
lower 352 access road.
7. Risk and vulnerability assessment conducted by the county and state.
8. Cafeteria doors secured with a slide bar for enhanced barricade
9. Lower lobby locked and monitored from 7:30 to 8:25 AM
10. All doors keyed to a master key.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 79
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
11. Distributed classroom kits with air horns, hammers, fire extinguishers, green and red
communication posters.
Security Action Items under Consideration 1. Update Crisis Management Plan
2. Install keyed deadbolts on classroom doors if approved by the fire department
3. Install communication upgrade allowing any teacher to alert the entire school.
4. Install security cameras both internal and external.
5. Redesign and improve the front entry foyer with security in mind.
6. Replace the current phone tree with an off-site emergency contact system.
A.5. ADEQUACY AND QUALITY OF MAINTENANCE/CLEANING.
Facility Satisfactory Needs
Improvement Unsatisfactory
Not
Applicable
School Building(s) X
Furnishings X
Provisions for the
Disabled X
Instructional Spaces X
Laboratories X
Counseling/Guidance
Space(s) X
Health Services Space(s) X
Library/Learning Media
Center X
Administrative and
Support Spaces X
Offices and Planning
Spaces for the Faculty X
Heating, Ventilation, Air
Conditioning X
Electrical, Water, and
Sanitation Systems X
Energy Conservation
System X
Security System X
Storage Spaces X
Parking Spaces X
Athletic Fields X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 80
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Facility Satisfactory Needs
Improvement Unsatisfactory
Not
Applicable
Indoor Athletic Space(s) X
Cafeteria/Dining Space(s) X
Auditorium/Theater X
Dormitories X
Chapel X
A.5.a. Provide a description of proposed improvements and/or corrective actions that
need to be taken if a rating of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” is
assigned. Include a description of actions that have been initiated or are
formally planned.
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 81
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard 5:
Facilities
The Standard: School facilities are safe, clean, and well maintained. The physical
environment supports delivery of the educational program/services as well as optimal
student development and achievement. Facilities are appropriate and adequate to
implement the philosophy/mission of the school. They are regularly inspected for
effective operation and meet all applicable laws including health and safety code
requirements.
5.1 – 5.6: Indicators for all schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
5.1 The school’s facilities and equipment are
appropriate for achieving its philosophy/mission
and are healthy, safe, and well maintained.
X
5.2 The school plans for, funds, and schedules regular
preventative measures, repairs, and maintenance
of its facilities and equipment.
X
5.3.a The facilities offer a variety of spaces for
providing quality programs and services for all
segments of the school’s population and include
appropriate accommodation for instruction;
X
5.3.b The facilities offer a variety of spaces for
providing quality programs and services for all
segments of the school’s population and include
appropriate accommodation for instruction;
X
5.3.c The facilities offer a variety of spaces for
providing quality programs and services for all
segments of the school’s population and include
appropriate accommodation for administration;
X
5.3.d The facilities offer a variety of spaces for
providing quality programs and services for all
segments of the school’s population and include
appropriate accommodation for: conferences;
X
5.3.e The facilities offer a variety of spaces for
providing quality programs and services for all X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 82
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
segments of the school’s population and include
appropriate accommodation for student activities;
5.3.f The facilities offer a variety of spaces for
providing quality programs and services for all
segments of the school’s population and include
appropriate accommodation for storage of school
property; and
X
5.3.g The facilities offer a variety of spaces for
providing quality programs and services for all
segments of the school’s population and include
appropriate accommodation for storage for
student belongings.
X
5.4 Sufficient systems are in place to monitor and
adjust air quality to appropriate levels. X
5.5 Lighting is adequate and appropriate in student
and staff areas. X
5.6 Sufficient space is available for ingress, egress,
and traffic flow within the facilities. X
Other:
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
Facilities The stakeholders generally support the concept that Saints Simon and Jude School has adequate
facilities for all programs and that the facilities are maintained to the highest standard. The
maintenance staff, business manager and parish finance council work hard to upgrade and
maintain the existing facilities.
The following comments from surveys support the notion that the school is committed to
providing an outstanding learning environment for all.
Building is fairly old but is somewhat well run.
The school is maintained beautifully. It would be nice if the bathrooms were a little
“fresher”.
Adequate space and equipment: Safe entry and flow.
Security Most survey responses expressed concern with the location of the main office and effect of that
on the security of the entire building.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 83
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
The entry is secured, however it would much more sensible to have administrative staff at
the entrance to the school! The entrance is rarely manned by a parent volunteer.
Changing the office location will provide better opportunities for a safer entrance.
B.2. Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
C. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
D. Root Cause Analysis
Foundational Issue: Facilities
Are there facilities standard
indicators not met or in need of
improvement that inhibit the
attainment of the organizational
capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 84
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
E. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the Facilities Standard.
The school has done extensive renovations and repairs to the building. In the last ten years, the
following additions and renovations have been undertaken:
New cafeteria and office space converted from the original church
New roof, floor, equipment, and HVAC installed in the gym
New HVAC installed in all the classrooms
New dedicated science lab installed
Computer lab updated
Electrical system upgraded to support school renovations
Lighting system upgraded to bring school up to code
Classrooms painted and recarpeted
Gym repainted
Lower level entrance renovated
Fire Alarm system and P.A. system upgraded
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
Facilities Standard.
The greatest need is to move the administrative offices closer to the main entrance of the school.
Many survey comments referenced this need as it is a major safety concern for all stakeholder
groups. Moving the administrative office to the main entrance would allow visitors to be
screened more accurately. Presently, volunteers screen visitors, but this system is dependent on
the volunteer being present at the designated times. Visitors now have complete access to the
entire school once they are buzzed into the building, and no direction is given as to areas where
they may or may not enter. The present system makes all vulnerable.
Secondly, the building it not ADA compliant. As noted earlier in the report, this compliance is a
long range plan.
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to Facilities that should be
included in the action plan in the Plan for Growth and Improvement.
Facilities renovation and compliance will be dictated by available funds in the budget. Any
monies from the Building for the Body of Christ Capital campaign will be used to make
upgrades. Clearly, the relocation of the main office is a priority since it appears on each
stakeholder group’s list of desired improvements. It will be started in the summer of 2014 and
expected to be completed before the opening of school.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 85
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard
Evidence School Floor plan of facilities X Long-range facilities plan X Maintenance/repair schedules X Plans for any facilities improvements X Policies related to facilities
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 86
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
SCHOOL CLIMATE AND ORGANIZATION STANDARD
FOR ACCREDITATION
A. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard 6:
School Climate and Organization
The Standard: The school’s organizational structure and climate facilitate
achievement of its core values as expressed in the philosophy/mission. The school
culture supports successful implementation of age- and developmentally appropriate
educational programs and services. Roles, responsibilities, expectations, and reporting
relationships are clearly defined. Administrative, instructional, and support staff are
qualified, competent, and sufficient in number to effectively provide quality
educational experiences. The school regularly conducts staff performance appraisals
and offers professional development opportunities informed by its philosophy/mission.
Relationships among the staff and leadership are collegial and collaborative.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 87
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
6.1 – 6.19: Indicators for all schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
6.1 The school’s design, organization, climate, and
leadership support attainment of the school’s
philosophy/mission.
X
6.2 Designated, qualified leadership provides
coordination, supervision, and direction for the
educational program, student services, and
student activities.
X
6.3 A logical and clear table of organization for the
school includes written job descriptions that
specify levels of responsibility and reporting
relationships.
X
6.4 Administrative, instructional, and support staffs
are qualified, competent, and sufficient in number
to meet the needs of the total educational
program, student services, and student activities.
X
6.5 Staff members, including administrators, are
assigned to work based on their education,
preparation, experience, expertise, and
commitment to the school’s success.
X
6.6 The school implements written personnel policies
and procedures for the operation of the school and
makes them available to all employees.
X
6.7 The school implements written policies and
procedures for determining adequate
compensation, arriving at reasonable workloads
and acceptable working conditions, and defining
just and fair treatment for all staff.
X
6.8 The school implements written policies and
procedures for evaluating staff performance.
Performance appraisals are conducted with the
knowledge of the staff member and reported in
writing as well as verbally. Results are used to
make professional development
recommendations. Staff members have an
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 88
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
opportunity to discuss and appeal their
appraisals.
6.9 Staff members are provided opportunities to offer
input into the content of their professional
development programs.
X
6.10 The school implements written policies and
procedures for handling complaints/grievances by
members of the staff.
X
6.11 The school implements written policies and
procedures for orienting and mentoring new staff
members.
X
6.12 The school implements written policies and
procedures to ensure that service providers not
employed by the school are appropriately
oriented, supervised, and supported.
X
6.13 The working environment for the staff promotes
collegiality, high expectations, trust, support, and
recognition for accomplishments and
contributions.
X
6.14 Professional satisfaction and good general morale
characterize the school’s staff. X
6.15 Staff members are committed to the school,
dedicated to their work, and take pride in the
outcome of their efforts.
X
6.16 The leadership encourages staff members’
affiliation with professional organizations. X
6.17 The school’s families and community demonstrate
commitment to, pride in, and support for the
school through participation, promotion of its
mission, and financial support.
X
6.18 Members of the staff, students, and their families
feel safe in the school. X
6.19 A clearly defined, written code of student conduct
supports an environment that is conducive to
learning and is understood by students, staff, and
families. The code is enforced fairly and
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 89
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
uniformly.
Other:
6.20 - 6.28: Indicators for schools that are part of a public school district,
archdiocesan/diocesan system, corporation, or other school
organization with a central office staff
These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
6.20 A logical and clearly understood table of
organization exists for the system of schools with
written job descriptions that specify levels of
responsibility and reporting relationships.
X
6.21 The design, organization, and climate of the
system of schools support attainment of the
school’s philosophy/mission.
X
6.22 Administrative, instructional, and support staffs
of the central office are qualified, competent, and
sufficient in number to meet the needs of the total
educational program, student services, and
student activities.
X
6.23 Central office staff members possess the
qualifications of education, preparation,
experience, and commitment that contribute to the
school’s success. Staff members are assigned to
work by reason of their training and expertise.
X
6.24 The central office’s leadership and staff work
cooperatively to create a climate for teaching and
learning that fosters the attainment of the school’s
philosophy/mission.
X
6.25 The organization implements written personnel
policies and procedures for the operation of the X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 90
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
system of schools and makes them available to all
employees.
6.26 The organization implements written policies and
procedures for determining adequate
compensation, arriving at reasonable workloads
and acceptable working conditions, and defining
just and fair treatment.
X
6.27 Central office leadership supports a
comprehensive program of professional
development for all members of the staff that
addresses system-wide learning expectations and
specific student needs by allocating appropriate
time and resources.
X
6.28 Central office leadership encourages the school
staff members’ affiliation with professional
organizations.
X
Other:
6.29 – 6.31: Indicators for schools with early age programs
X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
6.32: Indicator for schools that provide distance education
X This Indicator is not applicable to our school.
6.33 – 6.43: Indicators faith-based schools6
These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
6 The use of the Faith-Based Indicators for this and the other Standards for Accreditation by faith-based
schools is voluntary and not required, unless their use is directed by the head of a parent school system
such as a Diocesan/Archdiocesan or a similar system of schools. The Faith-Based Indicators allow faith-
based schools, if they desire, to include in their self-study and accreditation process Indicators of Quality
that address unique characteristics of and expectations for schools whose mission and educational
program are defined wholly or in part by their particular faith.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 91
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
6.33 The school’s environment portrays an identifiable
integration of faith, life, and culture. X
6.34 Programs of study, activities, athletics, codes of
conduct, and discipline actions reflect the
religious values expressed in the school’s
foundational documents.
X
6.35 Appropriate attention is given in all school
programs and activities to values and traditions
that demonstrate and reinforce the school’s
religious nature.
X
6.36 The faculty is provided with opportunities to
advance its understanding of the religious beliefs
and foundational documents of the school.
X
6.37 The school provides formal and informal
opportunities for the spiritual development of the
faculty and staff members.
X
6.38 Professional development opportunities regularly
provide for the spiritual development of the
faculty and staff as spiritual leaders in the school
community.
X
6.39 The religious studies program for students is well
defined and consistent with the mission of the
school and the sponsoring institution.
X
6.40 Prayer and/or expressions of faith are integral
components of the school’s curriculum and daily
activities.
X
6.41 Students play an appropriate role in planning,
organizing and conducting the school’s faith-
based experiences.
X
6.42 Criteria for hiring school personnel include an
assessment of the candidates’ understanding and
commitment to the foundational beliefs and
mission of the school.
X
6.43 The criteria for performance evaluations of the
faculty and staff members include understanding
and commitment to the mission and beliefs of the
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 92
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
school.
6.44 – 6.46: Indicators for all Pennsylvania public, independent, and faith-
based schools
These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
6.44 The school has and implements a written policy
that requires all applicants for employment with
the school, including employees of independent
contractors but excluding employees who do not
have direct contact with students, to undergo the
following background checks prior to being hired
or contracted:
a. Pennsylvania State Police Request for Criminal
Records Check;
b. PA Department of Public Welfare Child Abuse
History Clearance; and
c. Federal Criminal History Record Information
(CHRI) from a FBI fingerprint-based background
check.7
X
6.45 The school has and implements a written policy
that requires the school to review applicants’
required background check reports prior to their
being hired or contracted to determine the fitness
of the individual to work in a position in which
s/he will have contact with children.
X
7 Act 114 of 2006 (state law) specifies that all applicants for employment with public and private schools
including employees of independent contractors, but excluding employees who do not have direct
contact with students undergo background checks noted in Indicator 6.11. In addition, Act 114 extended
the background check requirements to include student teacher candidates prior to their field experience.
Student teacher background check reports are to be submitted to their higher education administrator.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 93
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
6.46 The school has and implements a policy that
requires the school to keep on file copies of the
required background check reports for all staff
hired or contracted on or after April 1, 2007.8
X
A.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
Although most stakeholders indicate that there is a safe climate in the school, it has been
indicated that the entry process into the building needs to be updated.
Overall, children are pleased with the rapport they have with their teachers.
Stakeholders are pleased with the religious experiences throughout the school day, stating
that both religion teachers and Masses inspire the children to follow God and grow
stronger in their faith.
Parents and students perceive the code of student conduct policy as being enforced
inconsistently.
Most parents agree that the teachers are competent, dedicated and professional, and they
display good morale. A small number of parents indicated that improvement is needed in
teacher morale and performance. Parents feel that children learn best when all teachers
demonstrate their love of teaching.
A.2. Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
N/A...a rating of 1 was not received in any of the indicators of quality
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
8 Act 114 of 2006 and the PA Public School Code, Section 1-111 requires public and private schools to keep
a copy of each background check report for each staff person hired on or after April 1, 2007 for the
duration of time the individual is employed by that school. This also applies to school contractors.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 94
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
C. Root Cause Analysis
Foundational Issue: School Climate and Organization
Are there school climate and
organization standard indicators
not met or in need of improvement
that inhibit the attainment of the
organizational capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion:
100% of stakeholders agree that the standard has
been met
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Based on survey results and evidence obtained by
committee
D. Implications for Planning
D.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the School Climate and
Organization Standard. SS Simon and Jude School’s organizational structure and climate are rooted in the school’s total
belief and commitment to its core values expressed in the mission statement and beliefs.
The significant strengths of SS. Simon and Jude School’s organizational structure and climate
include:
Organizational Strengths
o The school organization has a strong, supportive leadership, effective and timely
communication with the school community, and willingness to adapt to the ever-
changing educational demands. This is evident by
developmentally appropriate educational programs based on the Common
Core Standards, utilizing UbD unit lesson planning, clearly defined roles,
responsibilities, and expectations of all staff members as is described in
the faculty handbook.
regular and rigorous staff performance evaluations through classroom
observations and a formal written review by the school principal.
varied professional development opportunities, keeping up to date with
Act 48 requirements, along with Archdiocesan Catechetical Certification
requirements.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 95
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
o Qualified, committed, and competent staff that provide quality education. This is
evident by
A wide variety of learning experiences in all subjects. For example, the
LabLearner Science Program is centered on hands-on, experience-based
learning. Teachers use an array of teaching styles such as whole-group
instruction, cooperative groups, and differentiated instruction.
Accommodations are provided for students with individual learning
needs.
certified teachers, many with advanced degrees.
Personnel required state and archdiocesan documents prior to
employment. These documents are updated as needed and kept on file
through the duration of employment.
School Climate
o SS. Simon and Jude's faculty and staff believe that a positive school climate is
vital to school success. This is evident by
faculty and staff support of one another to maintain a positive climate at
all times by displaying strong moral values and adhering to expectations
and guidelines as detailed in the faculty handbook.
clearly defined code of student conduct which supports an environment
conducive to learning as is written in the student handbook and on the
conduct calendar.
faculty members who create a safe and inviting classroom environment by
promoting mutual respect, supporting risk taking and enabling students to
feel comfortable, share opinions, and think critically.
the opportunity for peer mediation when difficulties arise. Teachers also
foster student collaboration through Monday Morning meetings.
a deep faith-based catholic identity throughout the school community
displayed in
daily morning prayer and scripture reflection for faculty and for
students.
an emphasis on maintaining reverent physical posture during
prayer.
opportunities for spiritual development for faculty and staff that
enrich their personal lives, influence daily lessons and interactions
with the children and adhere to diocesan requirements.
the presence of IHM sisters throughout the school who serve as
role models of Christian faith and service.
D.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
School Climate and Organization Standard.
An area in need of improvement in meeting the School Climate and Organizational Standard is
consistent implementation of rules and expectations for students as defined in the student
handbook and on the conduct calendar.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 96
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
D.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to School Climate and
Organization that should be included in the action plan in the Plan for Growth
and Improvement.
Based on the strengths and needs for improvement the strategic priorities are as follows:
All faculty members will strive for consistency in enforcing the student code of conduct.
To provide consistency, all teachers will review both the student handbook and the
conduct calendar infractions with both parents and students at the beginning of the year,
as is age appropriate.
All teachers will set clear classroom expectations at the beginning of the year and post
these expectations in the classroom.
Faculty will be reminded at monthly faculty meetings to consistently reinforce all school
codes of conduct. The school will also consider initiating periodic meetings among
primary, elementary and middle school teachers to ensure consistency.
All faculty members will continue to attend a variety of professional development
workshops. Information learned at these workshops will be shared with the entire staff at
monthly faculty meetings.
All faculty members will continue to attend Catechetical formation classes to work
toward religion certification or to update certification.
E. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard
Evidence School Organizational chart for the school and school system X Floor plan of facilities X Salary schedules and descriptions of benefits packages for teachers, specialists, and
support staff X
Contracts (e.g. union, collective bargaining agreements) N/A Results of any climate survey X Instruments used for evaluating the performance of the staff X Professional development plan X Policies related to school climate and organization X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 97
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
HEALTH AND SAFETY STANDARD FOR ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related To This Standard
The following requirements ask the school to provide a self-assessment of expectations
for quality included in this Standard for Accreditation. The information and data
requested in this section are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and
data assist the school in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and
its Indicators of Quality.
A.1. EMERGENCY AND CRISIS PLANS:
Type of Emergency/Crisis Plan Effectiveness of
Plans
S NI U
External Lockdown X
Internal Lockdown X
Active Threat X
Parent/Child Reunification Plan X
Bomb Threat X
Suspicious Package X
Tornadoes X
Hurricanes X
Fire Emergencies X
Utility Emergencies X
Other:
A.1.a. Provide a description of proposed improvements and/or corrective actions that
need to be taken if a rating of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” is
assigned. Include a description of actions that have been initiated or are
formally planned.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 98
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A.2. EMERGENCY DRILLS:
Type of Emergency Drill Frequency of
Drills Quality of Drills
S NI U
Fire
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
4 Annually X
Natural Disaster (Severe Weather,
Flooding, etc.)
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
0 Annually X
Bomb Threat
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
0 Annually X
External Threat
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
1 Annually X
Internal Threat
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
1 Annually X
Bus Evacuation
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
2 Annually X
Other:
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
Annually
Other:
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
Annually
A.2.a. Provide a description of proposed improvements and/or corrective actions that
need to be taken if a rating of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” is
assigned. Include a description of actions that have been initiated or are
formally planned.
The school has an emergency protocol for the above items marked as “Needs Improvement.”
Although we have not practiced for a bomb threat, an updated crisis plan will be implemented in
the near future. Staff have been instructed how to react in the event of a phoned in bomb threat
although it is not practiced as a school-wide drill.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 99
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A natural disaster drill in the form of hurricane safety will be implemented. This will include
evacuation of the gym and classrooms, closing all doors, and having students seek shelter in the
ground floor of the school building in the hallways.
Bus evacuation drills are the responsibility of the bus companies and surrounding school districts
that provide the private schools with transportation.
A.3. HEALTH AND SAFETY INSPECTION SCHEDULE:
Type of Inspection Frequency
Results of
Inspections
S NI U
Fire Alarm System
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
2 Annually X
Food Services
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
2 Annually X
Elevator(s)
N/A Semi-Monthly N/A
Monthly
Annually
Internal Communications System
X Semi-Monthly X
Monthly
Annually
Technology Arts/Industrial Arts
Equipment
Semi-Monthly
X Monthly X
Annually
Athletic Equipment
Semi-Monthly
X Monthly X
Annually
Playground Equipment
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
X Annually X
Water Supply
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
X Annually X
Swimming Pool Water N/A Semi-Monthly N/A
Monthly
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 100
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Type of Inspection Frequency
Results of
Inspections
S NI U
Annually
Other: Pest Prevention by
Exterminator
Semi-Monthly
X Monthly X
Annually
Other: Science Lab
Semi-Monthly
X Monthly X
Annually
Other: Asbestos X Every Other
Year X
A.3.a. Provide a description of proposed improvements and/or corrective actions that
need to be taken if a rating of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” is
assigned. Include a description of actions that have been initiated or are
formally planned.
A.4. SUMMARY OF HEALTH SCREENINGS:
Screening For Conducted By
Frequency
Vision
(Every Student) School Nurse
Semi-
Monthly
Monthly
X - as
mandated
by state
Annually
Hearing
(Grades K, 1, 2, 3 and 7) School Nurse
Semi-
Monthly
Monthly
X - as
mandated
by state
Annually
Dental Private Provider Semi-
Monthly
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 101
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Screening For Conducted By
Frequency
(Grades K, 1 and 7) Monthly
X - as
mandated
by state
Annually
Physical
(Grades K, 1 and 6) Private Physician
Semi-
Monthly
Monthly
X - as
mandated
by state
Annually
Tuberculosis
Private Physician (if low risk
only repeated at physician's
request, if high risk - done
yearly)
Semi-
Monthly
Monthly
X - To
enter
school
Annually
A.5. SUMMARY OF INNOCULATIONS:
Inoculation For In Grade Level
DPT - 4 doses Mandated by the state must have to enter school All grades to
enter Hepatitis B- 3 doses Mandated by the state must have to enter school All grades to
enter MMR 2 doses -Mandated by the state must have to enter school
All grades to
enter Varicella 2 doses Mandated by the state must have to enter school
All grades to
enter TDAP - State Mandated Enter 7th Grade MCV State Mandated Enter 7th Grade
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 102
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A.6. PROVISIONS FOR HEALTH AND SAFETY:
Health and Safety Issue Quality and Adequacy
S NI U
Adequate health care services at all times. X
Health care at school functions that take place away
from the school’s premises. X
Means to communicate internally in event of power
failure of evacuation of building. X
Means to communicate externally in event of power
failure of evacuation of building. X
Place(s) to assemble during an evacuation X
Proper and safe storage of dangerous substances. X
Fire blankets and/or eye wash stations in required areas. X
Automatic external defibrillators available and staff
personnel trained to use them. X
Panic buttons for dangerous equipment. NA
Provisions for preventing the spread of infectious
substances and diseases. X
Safety lines in required areas. X
Students and the staff wearing eye and ear protection in
dangerous areas. X
Fire extinguishers available in all areas. X
Fire alarm pull stations in all areas. X
Evacuation notice and directions posted in all rooms
and spaces. X
A.6.a. Provide a description of proposed improvements and/or corrective actions that
need to be taken if a rating of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” is
assigned. Include a description of actions that have been initiated or are
formally planned.
Internal and External Communication In the event of a power failure there are no means to communicate to the staff. A plan for some
form of communication between staff is presently being discussed with the company that is
tasked with upgrading/moving the PA system as the administrative offices are relocated.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 103
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Cell phones could be used effectively in the event of a power failure, or if the building needs to
be evacuated. Instant messaging via a cell phone could be set up and stored in staff and
administration cell phones.
AED Usage AED’s are located both in the school and the church. A simple run through of the procedures for
their use could be accomplished during a faculty meeting or professional development day.
A.7. HEALTH AND SAFETY STAFF:
Type of Health and Safety Personnel Number Quality and Adequacy
S NI U
Certified Nurse 1 X
Nurse’s Assistant 0
School Security Officer 0
Local Police Security Officer 1 X
Athletic Trainer 1 X
Other:
Other:
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 104
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard 7:
Health and Safety
The Standard: A safe, orderly, and healthy environment for teaching and learning is
provided. The school adheres to local, state, and federal government health and safety
requirements. Health, safety, preventive/emergency procedures, and crisis management
policies are clearly written, well documented, implemented, and updated regularly.
7.1 – 7.15: Indicators for all schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
7.1 The school has satisfactory written procedures and
functional equipment with which to communicate
during fire and other emergencies, to summon
assistance, and to evacuate the school’s facilities.
X
7.2 The school provides adequate health care at
school functions that take place away from the
school’s premises.
X
7.3 Appropriate training is provided for all staff
members on how to implement emergency and
crisis plans, handle accidents and illnesses, and
prevent the spread of infectious diseases.
X
7.4 The school appropriately manages the storage and
administration of student medications. X
7.5 The school safely stores equipment and supplies. X
7.6 A system exists to account for the whereabouts of
students at all times. X
7.7 The school maintains comprehensive, current
health records for all students and staff. X
7.8 The school conducts and maintains written
records of regular emergency drills. X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 105
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
7.9 Designated members of the staff inform faculty
and families (as appropriate to maintain
confidentiality) about students’ health or physical
needs.
X
7.10 The school ensures that the staff is kept up–to-
date on relevant health, wellness, and safety
information and practices, including procedures
to deal with individual student needs.
X
7.11 Working relationships with local authorities and
health service providers are positive and ongoing. X
7.12 The educational program includes opportunities
for students to develop knowledge, attitudes, and
practices necessary for personal wellness and a
healthy lifestyle.
X
7.13 The school has an effective system to control access
to the school by visitors and other non-school
personnel.
X
7.14 Staff members model positive health and safety
practices. X
7.15 Safe drinking water is available throughout the
day for the staff and students. X
Other:
7.16: Indicator for schools with early age programs
X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
Health
Some students and parents feel that “Healthy Lifestyles” are not reinforced within the existing
curriculum. Comments include the following:
We don't learn about healthy living.
We never talk about our health.
Food served at celebrations in the school should be limited to healthier options (not
cupcakes and brownies). I believe there is a wellness policy, but it is not practiced nor
enforced.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 106
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
I find that the school can use more reinforcement of personal fitness and well-being.
Teachers would like to have more knowledge of First Aid and Safety as evidenced by the
following comments:
First Aid and/or CPR certification would be useful for staff.
Training is needed to provide all staff members on how to handle accidents and illnesses
and prevent the spread of infectious diseases.
Would love to have First Aid training offered to staff every few years. Community health
services are available to different grades on Health Topic but we do not seem to use them
very often.
Security Many comments were received that indicate a desire for the administrative offices to be relocated
to the main entrance.
Although SSJ does monitor access to the school by outsiders, there are definitely some
opportunities for improvement here that is why I rated this item a 2. There is a
committee actively working on security issues, which I commend. Along with many
other parents, I am especially wary of the front entrance to the school being breached -
there never seems to be anyone there and I have always been buzzed in remotely, based
on video recognition I assume.
Again, see my previous comments on safety and visitor access. Not sure if there is one,
but shouldn't there be an emergency button that can be pushed to alert entire school if a
bad person gains entry? Maybe there is, but I don't know.
B.2. Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
C. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 107
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
D. Root Cause Analysis
Foundational Issue: Health and Safety
Are there health and safety
standard indicators not met or in
need of improvement that inhibit
the attainment of the
organizational capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
E. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the Health and Safety
Standard.
Health
The school employs a nurse on the days that one is not provided by the local school
district. This demonstrates the school’s commitment to ensuring a healthy environment
for students and staff.
The school has a written wellness policy in accordance with the Archdiocese of
Philadelphia. Scheduled classroom parties include a healthy snack.
The school cafeteria serves food that meets the federal and state guidelines for childhood
nutrition.
All Commonwealth of Pennsylvania regulations are met in the storage and dispensing of
prescription and non-prescription medications.
AEDS are available in two locations in the school and checked by the nurse regularly.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 108
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Safety Doors are always locked. Monitoring of school entrance at arrival has been increased.
Written crisis plan is in all classrooms.
Emergency drills are practiced and documented.
Equipment is inspected routinely.
Security Security is an ongoing process, with all committed to providing the most secure environment for
students and staff. The following has been implemented throughout the school:
Maroon lanyards with identification cards worn by teachers
Yellow lanyards worn by visitors
Updated directions given for the reception desk volunteers
Walkie- talkies used for recess and outdoor P.E. classes
Updated floor plan for the school distributed to the main office, rectory, police and fire
departments.
Gathering points for evacuation designated, including the car dealership, church and
lower 352 access road.
Risk and Vulnerability Assessment conducted by the county and state.
Cafeteria doors secured with a slide bar for enhanced barricade
Lower lobby locked and monitored from 7:30 to 8:25 AM
All doors keyed to a master key.
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
Health and Safety Standard.
Healthy Lifestyles The school presently does have a wellness policy that is in accordance with the Archdiocese of
Philadelphia Wellness Policy. This policy is posted on the school’s website. The policy for
birthday treats is currently under revision.
Safety Staff should be trained on the use of AEDS.
Key staff should have basic first -aid training.
Administration should organize a cell phone communication tree among staff in the event
of a power failure.
Ask the township why Route 3 is not a school zone with flashing lights and reduced
speed during arrival and dismissal.
Classroom kits with whistles, hammers, fire extinguishers, green and red communication
posters.
Security Action Items under Consideration: Crisis Management Plan
Keyed deadbolts on classroom doors if approved by the fire department
Communication upgrade allowing any teacher to alert the entire school.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 109
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Security cameras both internal and external.
Front entry foyer renovation with security in mind.
New off-site phone tree contact system.
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to Health and Safety that
should be included in the action plan in the Plan for Growth and
Improvement.
1. Train all personnel in the use of an AED.
2. Finalize the relocation of the main office.
3. Investigate a way to communicate in the event of a power failure.
4. Go over crisis plan and wellness policy at the beginning of each year.
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard
Evidence School
Emergency and crisis plans X
Records of most recent health and safety inspections X
Record of emergency drills X
Emergency Procedures section of Faculty Handbook X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 110
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM STANDARD FOR
ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related To This Standard
The following requirements ask the school to provide a self-assessment of expectations
for quality included in this Standard for Accreditation. The information and data
requested in this section are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and
data assist the school in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and
its Indicators of Quality.
A.1. SUMMARY OF THE EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM:
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
TOTAL NUMBER OF INSTRUCTIONAL MINUTES PER WEEK
(RECOMMENDED BY OFFICE OF CATHOLIC EDUCATION)
Grade
Level
English/
Language
Arts
Math
Science
Social
Studies
The Arts
Other
Languages
Health/
P.E.
Technology
Religion
K
1 855 225 45 45 90 45 45 30 150
2 855 225 45 45 90 45 45 30 150
3 710 225 150 130 90 60 45 45 175
4 710 225 150 130 90 60 45 45 175
5 420 275 220 190 110 110 50 55 220
6 420 275 220 190 110 110 50 55 220
7 420 275 220 190 110 110 55 55 220
8 420 275 220 190 110 110 55 55 220
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 111
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard:
Educational Program
The Standard: An effective educational program for a school consists of both
carefully planned and well executed curriculum programs and solid instructional
pedagogy. Also fundamental to a successful educational program are the means to
assess student performance and growth as well as programmatic evaluation. Thus,
curriculum, instruction, and assessment are often considered to be the “heart” of any
school since these three components have such an impact on the total school experience
of students. The curriculum outlines what students should know and be able to do.
Instruction identifies effective ways for teachers to ensure student learning takes place.
Assessment indicates at what level students are able to demonstrate knowledge, skills,
and attitudes.
8.1 – 8.16: Indicators for all schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
8.1 Written curriculum guides identify program
objectives and define the scope and sequence of
the educational program. The guides are
functional.
X
8.2 The educational program provides instruction in
the basic subject areas of language arts and
literature (including early language development
and literacy skills, speaking, writing, and listening
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 112
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
communication skills), mathematics, the sciences,
and social sciences.
8.3 The educational program includes experiences in
visual and performing arts, health, world
languages, and physical education.
X
8.4 The educational program provides experiences
that promote students’ critical thinking,
reasoning, problem-solving skills, and study
skills.
X
8.5 The educational program includes instruction in
effective uses of information technology and
provides opportunities for application.
X
8.6 A variety of group learning settings (e.g.,
individual, small group, large group) is provided
for students daily.
X
8.7 The educational program offers opportunities for
development of social skills—such as increasing
self-control and a sense of individual and group
responsibility—in interaction with adults and
peers.
X
8.8 Written curriculum and instruction policies and
procedures provide direction to the staff,
leadership, and other stakeholders in the
development, implementation, and improvement
of the educational program.
X
8.9 Provision is made for both horizontal and vertical
articulation and coordination of the educational
program among all levels of the school.
X
8.10 An overview of the educational program, school
policies and procedures, and other pertinent
information is available in written form to
students and their parents.
X
8.11 The educational program defines desired student
outcomes as expressed in terms of student
understanding, knowledge, attitudes, skills, and
habits.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 113
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
8.12 Course or program objectives are simply stated
and understandable to students. X
8.13 The educational program considers the ages,
cultures, and varying levels of ability of students. X
8.14 The instructional program is designed to meet
students’ needs in accordance with the school’s
philosophy/mission.
X
8.15 The educational program and its expectations for
learning are understood and supported by the
school’s stakeholders.
X
8.16 Curriculum development is a dynamic, emergent
process influenced by the attributes and interests
of the children, their families, and teachers.
X
8.17 – 8.23: Indicators for schools with early age programs
X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
8.24 – 8.25: Indicators for schools with elementary school programs
These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
8.24 The educational program places emphasis on the
development of cognitive, psychomotor, and
affective skills, plus the knowledge and
competencies that establish the basis for greater
understanding.
X
8.25 The educational program provides experiences
that prepare students for successful transition to
middle and secondary school settings.
X
Other:
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 114
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
8.26 – 8.27: Indicators for schools with middle school programs
These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
8.26 The educational program provides activities and
experiences that assist early adolescents in
identifying their aptitudes and interests, self-
directed decision-making, and building self-
worth.
X
8.27 The educational program provides experiences
that prepare students for successful, smooth
transitions from elementary school to middle
school and from the middle school to secondary
school.
X
Other:
8.28 – 8.31: Indicators for schools with secondary school programs
X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
8.32 – 8.36: Indicators for schools that provide distance education
X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
8.37 – 8.48: Indicators for faith-based schools9
These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
9 The use of the Faith-Based Indicators for this and the other Standards for Accreditation by faith-based
schools is voluntary and not required, unless their use is directed by the head of a parent school system
such as a Diocesan/Archdiocesan or a similar system of schools. The Faith-Based Indicators allow faith-
based schools, if they desire, to include in their self-study and accreditation process Indicators of Quality
that address unique characteristics of and expectations for schools whose mission and educational
program are defined wholly or in part by their particular faith.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 115
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
8.37 The religious nature of the school is appropriately
reflected throughout the curriculum. X
8.38 The school teaches the faith of the sponsoring
institution in accordance with its official
teachings and traditions.
X
8.39 Religious education of the students is a priority in
scheduling, budgeting, and planning. X
8.40 The religious education of the students is a
concern of all faculty members. X
8.41 The religious dimension of all areas of the
curriculum is acknowledged. X
8.42 The school provides religious formation programs
for its faith-community members that are based
on the faith-community’s beliefs, values, and
traditions.
X
8.43 The religious education program is
developmentally appropriate in nature. X
8.44 Religious social teachings are integrated
throughout the school’s educational program. X
8.45 The curriculum for the health education
program(s) is consistent with the teachings and
values of the religious beliefs on which the school
is founded.
X
8.46 Faith development and community service
programs for students have clearly defined
objectives reflecting the mission of the school.
X
8.47 Faith development and community service
programs are seen as integral components of the
school’s educational programs.
X
8.48 Faith-based experiences that foster the religious
formation of the students are provided regularly. X
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
The following parent comments support the effectiveness of the educational program.
Thus far we have been very happy with the education our child is receiving.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 116
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
I continue to be impressed by how much my children are learning and how eager they are
to learn. It is truly a reflection of the school and teachers.
From a faith perspective this school is excellent and my daughters have benefited greatly
and have a strong faith.
B.2. Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
NA
C. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
D. Root Cause Analysis
Foundational Issue: Educational Program
Are there educational program
standard indicators not met or in
need of improvement that inhibit
the attainment of the
organizational capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 117
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
E. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the Educational Program
Standard.
The faculty and staff have been working diligently to implement the Common Core Curriculum.
Grades K-5 have recently adapted Common Core aligned reading (Scott Foresman Reading
Street) and math (Houghton Mifflin Go Math) series in grades K-6. Both incorporate a strong
technology component. In addition, the technology program has been enhanced with the
computer lab being converted to an iPad lab with Apple TV. Students in grades 7 and 8 use
iPads in the classroom, while students in grades 5 and 6 utilize netbooks.
Stakeholders noted religious identity and formation as key strengths. Participation in monthly
school Masses and prayer services enrich students’ faith. Students reflect on the Gospel and pray
together as a school community daily during morning assembly. Faith principles are not solely
confined to religion class, but reflected and encouraged throughout the school day.
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
Educational Program Standard.
Several survey comments indicate a dissatisfaction with the level of support for students with
special needs. Some stakeholders expressed a desire for more accommodations for students who
excel and those who struggle in school.
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to Educational Program that
should be included in the action plan in the Plan for Growth and
Improvement.
The faculty will continue to effectively implement the math and ELA Common Core Standards.
As social studies and science standards are released, the faculty plans to re-evaluate these
subjects as well.
While the school does have the Chester County Intermediate Unit services to address special
needs, there is no control over the hours allotted to the school. Therefore, the faculty must
provide differentiated instruction and classroom accommodations. The school will add fourth
grade to the honors math program for the 2014-2015 school year. The faculty recently
implemented a data system to track and document the progress of students with special needs, as
well as accommodations made for them in the classroom. Every effort is being made to see that
these folders are kept up to date.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 118
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of this Standard
Evidence School
Program of studies or other overview of the components of the educational
program Online
Scope and sequence charts Online
Written curriculum guides for each component of the educational program Online
Master schedule X
Policies related to educational program X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 119
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
ASSESSMENT AND EVIDENCE OF STUDENT LEARNING
STANDARD FOR ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related To This Standard
The following requirements ask the school to provide a self-assessment of expectations
for quality included in this Standard for Accreditation. The information and data
requested in this section are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and
data assist the school in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and
its Indicators of Quality.
A.1. EVIDENCE OF STUDENT LEARNING:
Name of Assessment
Grade Level(s)
Administered
Curricular Area(s) Assessed
Evaluation of Most Recent
Results
S NI U
TN (Terra Nova)
3 Multiple
Assessment
2 Reading, Math
Science, Social
Studies
X
TN (Terra Nova)
3 Common Core
3 - 7 Reading, Language
Math, Science
Social Studies
X
TN (Terra Nova)
3 In View
3 - 7 Cognitive Skills X
Reading Street
Benchmark Tests
K-5 Common Core ELA
Standards (Reading,
Writing, Language)
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 120
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B. Self-Assessment to Adherence to the Indicators Of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard 9:
Assessment and Evidence of Student Learning
The Standard: The school systematically collects and rigorously analyzes
quantifiable and observable evidence of individual learning and growth from multiple
valid and reliable sources. Evidence of student learning is used to evaluate and improve
curriculum effectiveness, instructional practices, professional development, and
support services. Progress in student learning and performance is expected and is
accurately, clearly, and systematically reported to the school community.
9.1 – 9.15: Indicators for all schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
9.1 The leadership and staff commit to, participate in,
and share in accountability for student learning. X
9.2 Assessment of student learning and performance
is aligned with curriculum and instruction in a X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 121
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
coherent system consistent with the school’s
philosophy/mission.
9.3.a Assessment results are analyzed with appropriate
frequency and rigor for individual students as
they move through the school
X
9.3.b Assessment results are analyzed with appropriate
frequency and rigor for cohorts of students as they
move through the school
X
9.3.c Assessment results are analyzed with appropriate
frequency and rigor for comparable (local, state,
and national) groups outside of the school
X
9.4 Assessment results are used to make decisions
regarding allocation of resources. X
9.5 The assessment of student learning and
performance enables students to monitor their
own learning progress and teachers to adapt their
instruction to students’ specific learning needs.
X
9.6 Assessment methods and content address suitable
social, emotional, physical, and
cognitive/language goals for students.
X
9.7 Assessments take into account recent, reliable
research findings on child development and
growth.
X
9.8 Assessments reflect understanding of the unique
needs and backgrounds of each student. X
9.9 Records of students’ learning and performance are
maintained. General standards for transcript
control and use, including those related to
confidentiality, are known and observed.
X
9.10 Assessment results are the basis for making
recommendations to families whose children may
benefit from further evaluation. Referrals to
specialists are made for early identification of
possible disabilities and/or health conditions.
X
9.11 Members of the staff work collaboratively with
colleagues and families to review data about X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 122
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
learners’ progress and to develop appropriate
strategies for continued progress.
9.12 Families are viewed as an important source of
information and insights about students. X
9.13 The school communicates its assessment policies
and practices to the total school community (e.g.,
via parent handbooks, web sites, teacher
handbooks, policy manuals).
X
9.14 Communication with families regarding students’
progress in learning and performance is regular,
productive, and meaningful.
X
9.15 Students learn and perform at levels expected, or
progress is being made to raise results
accordingly.
X
Other:
9.16: Indicator for schools with early age programs
X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
9.17 - 9.20: Indicators for schools that provide distance education
X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
9.21: Indicator for faith-based schools10
These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
10
The use of the Faith-Based Indicators for this and the other Standards for Accreditation by faith-based
schools is voluntary and not required, unless their use is directed by the head of a parent school system
such as a Diocesan/Archdiocesan or a similar system of schools. The Faith-Based Indicators allow faith-
based schools, if they desire, to include in their self-study and accreditation process Indicators of Quality
that address unique characteristics of and expectations for schools whose mission and educational
program are defined wholly or in part by their particular faith.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 123
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
9.21 Evaluation of the students’ knowledge of the
religious beliefs and values of the school is
included in the school’s assessment program.
X
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
SS. Simon and Jude School received an average rating of 3 in the surveys submitted on all the
indicators of quality in the Assessment and Evidence of Student Learning Standard. Positive
strengths in the existing communication structure include: mid-trimester progress reports,
trimester report cards, ongoing assessment folders, weekly responsibility calendars, the formal
annual parent-teacher conferences, and ongoing phone calls, email and conferences.
However, a few parents indicated that increased and more consistent communication is needed
throughout the year between parents and teachers. Parents want information regarding their
child’s social, emotional and academic progress over and above what is currently provided.
Parents are interested in receiving further practical suggestions and methods to assist their child
when academic concerns arise.
B.2. Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
N/A
C. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 124
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
D. Root Cause Analysis
Foundational Issue: Assessment and Evidence of Student Learning
Are there school climate and
organization standard indicators
not met or in need of improvement
that inhibit the attainment of the
organizational capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
E. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the Assessment and Evidence
of Student Learning Standard.
Teachers use a wide variety of formative and summative assessments to tap different
student strengths.
Parents have access to online grades that are updated frequently, in addition to
assessment folders that are sent home regularly.
Students use online programs such as Go Math, Achieve 3000, and SRA Reading Lab
which contain objective assessment elements.
The reading and math programs provide assessments which are aligned with the Common
Core Standards.
The Science Lab Learner program assesses students in their application of factual
learning in a laboratory environment.
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
Assessment and Evidence of Student Learning Standard.
Parents would appreciate more frequent, personal and specific communication in addition
to the annual Parent Conference Day.
Teachers feel the need to improve consistency in the types of rubrics that are used
throughout the school.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 125
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to Assessment and Evidence
of Student Learning that should be included in the action plan in the Plan for
Growth and Improvement.
The principal will schedule professional development opportunities for teachers to
develop strong, consistent rubrics.
The faculty will explore additional avenues to increase communication with parents, for
example, at the mid-point of the second trimester.
The faculty will continue to analyze Terra Nova data to drive instruction and address
areas of weakness.
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard
Evidence School Example of student transcript: (permanent record card, Math and Language Arts
Folders) X
Example student report card, and progress report from Option C X Reports of the results of assessments administered to students: (Terra Nova, Mid-
trimester Progress Reports) X
Policies related to assessment of student learning: (The OCE sets the number of
required assessments in a grading period)
Examples of classroom assessments at various levels
Terra Nova Reports from CTB Online
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 126
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STUDENT SERVICES STANDARD FOR ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related To This Standard
The following requirements ask the school to provide a self-assessment of expectations
for quality included in this Standard for Accreditation. The information and data
requested in this section are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and
data assist the school in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and
its Indicators of Quality.
A.1. STUDENT SERVICES STAFF
Type of Student
Services Personnel Number Source
Adequacy of
Type and Number
S NI U
Guidance Counselor 0.6 Staff
X Outsourced X
Psychologist As
Needed
Staff
X
X Outsourced
Psychiatrist Staff
Outsourced
Substance Abuse
Counselor
Staff
Outsourced
Certified Special
Education Teacher
Staff
Outsourced
Special Education
Paraprofessional
Staff
Outsourced
Food Services 2 X Staff X
Outsourced
Transportation Staff
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 127
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Type of Student
Services Personnel Number Source
Adequacy of
Type and Number
S NI U
Services X Outsourced X
Admissions
Counselor
Staff
Outsourced
Other: Nurse 2 X Staff
X X Outsourced
Other: IU Staff 3 Staff
X X Outsourced
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators Of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 128
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard:
Student Services
The Standard: The school implements written policies and procedures, in
partnership with families and the community, that provide all students with, or refer
them to, services that are age- and developmentally appropriate to optimize
opportunities for life-long success. Student services are systematic and integral to the
educational program. They are provided by qualified personnel, sufficiently financed,
periodically evaluated, and philosophy/mission appropriate.
10.1 – 10.26: Indicators for all schools
Student Support Services
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
10.1 Student support services address academic skills
development, social skills development, personal
growth, and career planning.
X
10.2 Counselors, administrators, teachers, and/or other
staff members share responsibility for providing
guidance and support to students.
X
10.3 The school is sensitive to the critical importance of
non-academic needs of students. A process is in
place to address students’ emotional and social
needs.
X
10.4 Assessment data are used to adapt curriculum
and teaching methods, provide personalized
counseling, and identify appropriate program
placement for students.
X
10.5 Career awareness activities are provided as
appropriate. X
10.6 Student support services extend into and
incorporate community services as needed. X
10.7 Student data are current, comprehensive, and
readily available for the staff’s use. X
10.8 Follow-up studies of graduates and other former
students are carried out and data are shared with X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 129
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
staff to help determine the effectiveness of the
school’s educational program and services.
10.9 The school offers an orientation program for new
students and their families to share the school’s
philosophy/mission, policies, procedures, and
expectations.
X
10.10 Families are provided with information about
child development, education, and related topics
through personal communications, pamphlets,
meetings, and referrals to web sites and other
resources.
X
Other:
Transportation Services
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
10.11 Written policies and procedures are implemented
to ensure the safety of students when being
picked up, transported, and dropped off by
transportation provided by the school.
X
10.12 Appropriate training is provided to transportation
providers. X
10.13 Transportation services provided or contracted by
the school meet the safety requirements of all
appropriate legal authorities.
X
Other:
Food Services
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
10.14 Student dining areas are functional and hygienic. X
10.15 Meals provided by the school meet generally X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 130
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
accepted nutritional standards. Information about
nutritional values of the foods is available.
10.16 Appropriate training is provided to food services
providers. X
10.17 Food services personnel meet the health
requirements of all appropriate authorities. X
10.18 Food service facilities are inspected regularly and
meet the health and safety requirements of all
appropriate authorities.
X
Other:
Services for Student with Special Needs
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
10.19 The school implements written policies and
procedures to identify and address the needs of
students with special needs.
X
10.20 The school provides or refers families to
appropriate related services and/or
accommodations to meet student needs.
X
10.21 As applicable, the school is in compliance with all
local, state, and federal requirements related to
students with special needs.
X
Other:
Admissions and Placement
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
10.22 The school implements written admissions policies
and procedures. X
10.23 The school implements written policies and
procedures for placement of students in
appropriate programs and levels.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 131
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
10.24 Applicants for enrollment and their families are
clearly informed of the philosophy/mission of the
school, the nature and extent of the educational
program and services available, tuition and fees (if
applicable), school policies, and expectations for
satisfactory student performance.
X
10.25 The school accepts students for whom there is a
reasonable expectation of success in the
educational program as appropriate and
interpreted by law.
X
10.26 All statements and representations relating to the
school’s educational programs, services, and
resources are clear, accurate, and current.
X
Other:
10.27 – 10.31: Indicators for schools that provide distance education
X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
10.32 – 10.35: Indicators for faith-based schools11
These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
10.32 The guidance/counseling services reflect the
school’s religious identity and mission. X
10.33 Counseling and campus ministry personnel
cooperate on programs addressing emerging X
11
The use of the Faith-Based Indicators for this and the other Standards for Accreditation by faith-based
schools is voluntary and not required, unless their use is directed by the head of a parent school system
such as a Diocesan/Archdiocesan or a similar system of schools. The Faith-Based Indicators allow faith-
based schools, if they desire, to include in their self-study and accreditation process Indicators of Quality
that address unique characteristics of and expectations for schools whose mission and educational
program are defined wholly or in part by their particular faith.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 132
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
student needs.
10.34 Guidance services support the development of the
faith-based community of the school. X
10.35 Admissions policies are consistent with the
school’s religious values and traditions. X
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings: Parent comment:
“The communications from the school are clear, accurate, and up to date.”
Student comment:
“They do not teach me about careers I can go into. We don’t talk about career options.
We had one class on careers last year.”
Staff comments:
“I have never been informed about our graduates successes and failures.”
“I know of no follow-up data on our graduates.”
Many students are dissatisfied with the quality and quantity of the hot lunches.
B.2. Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
N/A… a rating of 1 was not received in any of the indicators of quality
C. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard For Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 133
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
D. Root Cause Analysis
Foundational Issue: Student Services
Are there student services standard
indicators not met or in need of
improvement that inhibit the
attainment of the organizational
capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion:
100% of stakeholders agree that the standard has
been met
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Based on survey results and evidence obtained by
committee
E. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the Student Services
Standard. SS. Simon and Jude School’s student services are a vital part of the school’s ongoing
commitment to the education, safety, and enrichment of the students. The significant strengths
of SS. Simon and Jude School’s student services include
Child Study Teams available when needed.
ample space and dedicated room assignments for the IU staff.
WCASD gifted program for qualified students.
free transportation through the school district.
counselor-supported faculty help to identify and address needs of students.
counselor-taught social skills reinforced by teachers.
faculty supported by peer mediation for student conflict resolution
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
Student Services Standard.
Based on the survey comments, the areas in need of improvement are the food service, career
exploration, and graduate follow-up plans.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 134
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to Student Services that
should be included in the action plan in the Plan for Growth and
Improvement.
The principal and the food-services coordinator will research and collaborate to explore
other food-service options that may be more appetizing, filling and nutritious for the
students.
The school counselor will work with SSJ community stakeholders to assess current career
awareness and develop more career-awareness programs.
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard
Evidence School Admissions criteria (if applicable Description of guidance and counseling services available X Results of follow-up studies of graduates Policies related to student services X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 135
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STUDENT LIFE AND STUDENT ACTIVITIES STANDARD
FOR ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related To This Standard
The following requirements ask the school to provide a self-assessment of expectations
for quality included in this Standard for Accreditation. The information and data
requested in this section are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and
data assist the school in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and
its Indicators of Quality.
A.1. SUMMARY OF NON-ATHLETIC STUDENT ACTIVITIES.
Number of
Students
Participating
Adequacy and
Quality of the
Activity
ACADEMIC
Honors Math 36 S
Teen Biz 108 S
Science Explorers Approximately 20
per session
S
Reading Olympics 40 S
Study Skills 10 S
Mathematics for Missions 39 S
IU Math Support 23 S
IU Reading Support 38 S
IU Speech and Language Therapy 33 S
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 136
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Blue Rocks Challenge School Wide S
Career Guidance Program 73 S
Book Fair School Wide S
Lab Learner School Wide S
Spanish School Wide S
Technology/Computer Lab School Wide S
First in Math Grades 1-8 S
SRA Reading Grades 3-5 S
Robotics Approximately 8-
10 per session
S
Model UN 22 S
SOCIAL
Formal 8th
Grade Dances 31 S
STAR Program guidance lessons 88 S
Buddies (K, 1, 2, 6, 7, 8) 247 S
Focus Groups 157 S
Counselor lunch bunch 74 S
7th
and 8th
grade cluster dances 73 S
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 137
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Weekly class meetings School Wide S
Peer Mediation 34 S
Individual counseling 100 S
Kitchen Wizards Approximately 15
per session
S
DARE 47 S
SPIRITUAL
Altar Servers 25 S
Church Cleaning Service Project 31 S
Delaware Valley Children’s Charity School Wide S
Christmas Pageant 31 S
Stations of the Cross School Wide S
Peacemakers School Wide S
School prayer School Wide S
Class Masses School Wide S
Confirmation Service Projects 38 S
First Friday School Mass School Wide S
8th
Grade Retreat 31 S
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 138
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
PARISH PROGRAMS
Scouts (Daisy, Brownie, Girls, Boys) 100 S
Vacation Bible School 88 S
First Eucharist 49 S
Confirmation 35 S
First Reconciliation 42 S
Children’s Choir varies S
Youth Group Grades 7 & 8 - varies S
May Procession School Wide S
Confirmation Retreat 35 S
First Eucharist Retreat 42 S
LITERARY
Memory Book 30 S
ARTS
Art Club 24 S
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 139
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Concert Choir 11 S
Chorus 45 S
Music Lessons/Band 45 S
Talent Show 4th through 8th
grades
S
LEADERSHIP
Student Council 16 S
Peer mediators 24 S
Daily announcers 41 S
Daily prayer leaders 2 S
Student ambassadors 10 S
SERVICE
Clothes/money to St. Veronicas School Wide S
Church Cleaners Grade 8 S
PB & J Collection School Wide S
Mission Money School Wide S
Delaware Valley Children’s Charity School Wide S
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 140
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Thanksgiving Food Drive School Wide S
The Giving Tree School Wide S
Emergency Baby Formula Drive School Wide S
Operation Rice Bowl School Wide S
Teddy Bear Collection School Wide S
St. Agnes Day Room Collection Grade 7 S
Camilla Hall Collection School Wide S
Lunch Room Aides Grade 6 S
ASSEMBLIES
Science Explorers School Wide S
Instrumental Music School Wide S
Windy City School School Wide S
Walnut Street Theatre Bully presentation 266 S
Paul Defrancesco Cyber bully presentation 112 S
Paoli Hospital Career Presentation/
Technical College High School
Presentation
73 S
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 141
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
FIELD TRIPS
Every grade K-8 is provided the
opportunity to participate in two
curriculum-based field trips per school
year.
SPECIAL EVENTS
Walk-a-thon School Wide S
Catholic School Week School Wide S
Movie night School Wide S
Game night 31 S
Monster Mash School Wide S
Beach Day School Wide S
Back to School Picnic School Wide S
Santa Secret Shop School Wide S
Talent Show School Wide S
Spirit Day School Wide S
Breakfast with Santa School Wide S
Bingo night School Wide S
Christmas Pageant School Wide S
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 142
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MISCELLANEOUS
Cares School Wide S
A.2. SUMMARY OF ATHLETIC STUDENT ACTIVITIES.
Type of Student
Activity
Available
for
Number of
Students
Participating
Adequacy and
Quality of the
Activity
Males Females S NI U
Parish CYO
Basketball
Grades 5-8 68 62 130 S
Parish CYO
Soccer
Grades 5-8 17 22 39 S
Parish CYO
Football
Grades 5-8 79 79 S
Parish CYO
Cheerleading
Grades 4-8 9 9 S
Parish CYO
Baseball
Grades 5-8 25 S
Parish CYO
Track
Grades 1-8 32 32 64 S
Parish CYO
Lacrosse
Grades 5-8 38 20 S
Parish CYO
Volleyball
Grades 5-8 38 38 S
Biddy Hoops Grades 1-4 40
36 76 S
*numbers include non-parochial students
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 143
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard 11:
Student Life and Student Activities
The Standard: A healthy atmosphere exists for all students. At all levels, non-
discriminatory, appropriate student activities that supplement classroom experiences or
community life are provided. An appropriate student activities program fosters a
positive intellectual, cultural, and social climate, promotes growth in student leadership
and social interaction skills, and encourages students’ special interests.
11.1. – 11.6: Indicators for all schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
11.1 Students are offered opportunities to build their
skills in handling responsibility, taking initiative, X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 144
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
leadership competencies, cooperation, and self-
direction.
11.2 Students, staff, families, and the community are
encouraged to offer input about and participate in
student activities.
X
11.3 Staff members, parents, and other volunteers who
lead or participate in student activities are
approved by the school’s leadership, suitably
qualified, and provide appropriate supervision to
students.
X
11.4 The school recognizes student accomplishments,
contributions, and responsibilities in meaningful
ways.
X
11.5 Relationships among staff, volunteers, and
students demonstrate respect, fairness, and
understanding.
X
11.6 The school holds events that include staff,
families, and children. X
Other:
11.7 – 11.9: Indicators for boarding schools
X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
11.10: Indicator for faith-based schools12
These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
12
The use of the Faith-Based Indicators for this and the other Standards for Accreditation by faith-based
schools is voluntary and not required, unless their use is directed by the head of a parent school system
such as a Diocesan/Archdiocesan or a similar system of schools. The Faith-Based Indicators allow faith-
based schools, if they desire, to include in their self-study and accreditation process Indicators of Quality
that address unique characteristics of and expectations for schools whose mission and educational
program are defined wholly or in part by their particular faith.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 145
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
11.10 All student activities and athletics include
opportunities for the faith formation of the
students.
X
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings: Saints Simon and Jude parents’ comments include:
The school provides a variety of sports and activities that are well supervised for students
of all ages.
Faith is an important part of all activities.
Students’ accomplishments are recognized.
The students at Saints Simon and Jude’s comments include:
CYO Sports are well run.
CYO is a big aspect of children’s lives at SSJ.
I love my school, it’s a wonderful faith filled environment.
B.2. Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
N/A
C. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 146
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
D. Root Cause Analysis
Foundational Issue: Student Life and Student Activities
Are there student life and student
activities standard indicators not
met or in need of improvement that
inhibit the attainment of the
organizational capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion:
100% of stakeholders agree that the standard has
been met
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Based on survey results and evidence obtained by
committee.
E. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the Student Life and Student
Activities Standard.
SS. Simon and Jude student life and student service activities focus on promoting the core values
of the school during both classroom time and extracurricular activities. All activities are
supervised by adults who have up-to-date clearances required for all employees and volunteers.
The significant strengths of SS Simon and Jude School’s Student Life and Student Activities
Standard:
Student Life Strengths:
The school provides a wide variety of activities for grades K-8. These activities are
supervised by adults who have the up-to-date clearances required for all employees and
volunteers.
Student and/or team success is celebrated in the Peek of the Week, the Newsletter, the
Media Bulletin Board, Parish Bulletin, School and Parish Websites and Morning
Assembly.
School Community events include teachers, families, and students.
Many activities are based on the Christian belief in the importance of helping others.
A wide variety of sports are sponsored by the parish CYO.
Activities and sports begin with prayer.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 147
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
Student Life and Student Activities Standard.
An area which needs to be reassessed is the Peacemaker Program and better communication of
the selection process to the parents.
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to Student Life and Student
Activities that should be included in the action plan in the Plan for Growth
and Improvement.
The faculty will review the Peacemaker selection process and will clearly communicate the
process to the parents.
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard
Evidence School Samples of student publications—e.g., yearbook, student newspaper, literary
magazine X
Budget for all athletic activities X Budget for all non-athletic activities X Peacemaker Award bulletin board displays X Peacemakers recognized during parish community First Friday Mass X School/Parish websites X School newsletter X Positive stakeholder comments from survey X Trophy cases and championship banners in the gym X Prayer posted in gym and recited before sports events X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 148
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
INFORMATION RESOURCES AND TECHNOLOGY
STANDARD FOR ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related To This Standard
The following requirements ask the school to provide a self-assessment of expectations
for quality included in this Standard for Accreditation. The information and data
requested in this section are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and
data assist the school in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and
its Indicators of Quality.
A.1. INFORMATION RESOURCES AND TECHNOLOGY:
Type of Information/Technology Resource Quantity of
Resource
Quality and Adequacy
of Resource
S NI U
Curriculum Focused Printed Books 3,221 X
Reference Printed Books 34 X
Leisure Reading Printed Books 3,581 X
Magazine/Journal Subscriptions 5 X
Curriculum Specific Application Software
Programs 4 X
Administrative Application Software
Programs 5* X
Application Software Programs Available on
School Network 160** X
Networked Desktop Computers for Students 14 X#
Networked Laptop Computers for Students 41 X#
Networked Netbook Computers for Students 85 X Networked Desktop and/or Laptop Computers
for the Staff in Classrooms/ Offices 30 X
Classrooms with Hard-Wired Internet Access 22 X
Classrooms with Wireless Internet Access 24 X
LCD Projectors 23 X
Classrooms with Smartboards 21 X
Overhead Projectors 5 X
Devices with Video Recording Capabilities 235 X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 149
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Type of Information/Technology Resource Quantity of
Resource
Quality and Adequacy
of Resource
S NI U
iPad2s 150 X
PowerSync Carts for iPad 1 X
Apple TVs 6 X##
Aerohives (wireless routers) 8 X##
A.2. FACILTIES FOR INFORMATION RESOURCES AND TECHNOLOGY:
Type of Information/Technology Facility Quality and
Adequacy of Facility
S NI I
Information Resources Center (library, media center) X
Technology Resource Center X
Storage for Information Resources X
Storage for Technology X
Office for Information Resources Staff X
Office for Technology Staff X
A.3. INFORMATION RESOURCES AND TECHNOLOGY STAFF:
Type of Information Resources and
Technology Personnel Number
Adequacy of Type and
Number
S NI U
Credentialed Information Resources Center
(library, media center) personnel 2 X
Information Resources Center (library,
media center) support personnel 0 X
Technology Support 4* X
*2 of which are contracted (R&S Design and Triangle Support Services)
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 150
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators Of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard
Information Resources and Technology
The Standard: Information resources, materials, and technology are accessible and of
adequate scope, quantity, and quality to facilitate the school’s pursuit of its total
educational program. These resources encourage all students and staff to broaden and
extend their knowledge and skills. Access to appropriate information resources and
technology is provided for students and staff. Appropriate instruction is offered to
develop student and staff inquiry, research, and information literacy skills. Information
technology equipment is functional and well maintained.
12.1 – 12.11: Indicators for all schools
Information Resources
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
12.1 Information resources are properly catalogued,
housed, and periodically reviewed for relevancy X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 151
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
and currency.
12.2 Media center staff is sufficient and appropriately
qualified to provide effective services to students
and staff.
X
12.3 Adequate orientation about the use of media
services, learning resources, and equipment is
provided to the staff and students.
X
12.4 Information resources are appropriately supported
annually with funding from the school’s budget. X
12.5 Information resources are age- and
developmentally appropriate, current, and reflect
social and cultural diversity.
X
12.6 Staff and students are provided opportunities to
offer input into the types, quality, and format of
the information resources provided.
X
Technology
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
12.7 The technology resources staff is sufficient and
appropriately qualified to provide effective
service to students and staff.
X
12.8 Technology resources are appropriately
maintained and supported annually with funding
from the school’s budget.
X
12.9 Adequate skills training on the use of technology
resources and equipment is provided to the staff
and students.
X
12.10 The school implements written policies and
procedures for acceptable use of technology. X
12.11 Long-range planning activities are in place to
ensure that the school keeps pace with
technological changes.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 152
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
12.12 – 12.13: Indicators for schools with early age programs
X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
12.14 – 12.15: Indicators for schools that provide distance education
X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
The computer lab update was impressive.
Our technology department is growing… it is amazing!
The school is in the stage of increasing bandwidth to improve volume of users in
technology
We have a ton of technology such as iPads, netbooks, and Smart boards
B.2. Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
NA
C. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS with this Standard for
Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
92% of all respondents agree that we meet the school standard for Information Resources and
Technology
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 153
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
D. Root Cause Analysis
Foundational Issue: Information Resources and Technology
Are there information resources
and technology standard indicators
not met or in need of improvement
that inhibit the attainment of the
organizational capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
E. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the Information Resources
and Technology Standard.
SS. Simon and Jude School provides students with adequate technology as evidenced by
one on one iPads for 7th and 8th grade, one on one netbooks for 5th and 6th grade, and
numerous other technologies available in each classroom i.e. Apple TVs, projectors, and
Smart boards.
Additional iPads are available for classroom projects.
Teachers are trained regularly on the best methods for integrating technology into their
daily lessons.
The online grading program (Option C) and course management software (Moodle)
provide parents the opportunity to monitor student grades frequently and stay abreast of
classroom assignments and information.
SS. Simon and Jude School informs parents and students of the procedures regarding
acceptable use of technology as evidenced by the policy of requiring parental and student
signatures on technology contracts.
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
Information Resources and Technology Standard.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 154
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Future needs may dictate the implementation of more technology, specifically networked
devices, into the school library. In addition, the consolidation of technology and information
resources into one media center would be effective.
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to Information Resources
and Technology that should be included in the action plan in the Plan for
Growth and Improvement.
As funds and time permit the plan is to
increase the one-to-one ratio of technological devices for students.
continue to add more aerohives and better wireless access for lower floors and library.
install more Apple TVs in classrooms.
increase coordination between technology lab and library to better serve student
population.
create a long range financial plan to continually update networked desktops and laptops.
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard
Evidence School The information resources and technology plan(s)
(long-term school renovation plan attached) X
Budget for information resources and technology Information skills curriculum
(weblink:http://www.catholicschools-phl.org/curriculum/elementary-school-
curriculum/) X
Policies related to information resources and technology
(technology agreement) X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 155
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
SELF-ASSESSMENT OF THE
INDICATORS OF QUALITY FOR
CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION, AND ASSESSMENT
s an educational institution, a school needs to give considerable attention to the
quality and comprehensiveness of its curriculum as well as the effectiveness of
the instructional pedagogy and assessment practices used to ensure student
success.
As part of its planning for growth and improvement, the school conducted an in-depth
self-examination of the curriculum, instructional program, and assessment practices for
those components of its educational program that are deemed essential to the areas of
student performance that have been identified as the priorities for growth and
improvement. Using the Middle States Indicators of Quality for Curriculum,
Instruction, and Assessment, this self-assessment required the school to look carefully
at its written curriculum, how the curriculum is delivered to the students, and the
practices used to assess the degree to which the students are achieving the learning
goals of the curriculum.
The overall purpose of this self-assessment is to identify any aspects of the school’s
curriculum, instructional pedagogy, and assessment practices that need to be developed
or improved to increase the likelihood that the school will be able to achieve the goals it
set for growing and improving student performance. Areas identified for development
and/or improvement should be included in the action plans for the measurable student
performance and organizational capacity goals that are the heart of the Plan for Growth
and Improvement.
While the Visiting Team does not evaluate the quality of the curricular components
selected for self-assessment, the Team will note those areas the school identified for
development and/or improvement and expects to see those areas addressed in the
action plans.
A
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 156
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
SELF-ASSESSMENT OF THE INDICATORS OF
QUALITY FOR CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION, AND
ASSESSMENT IN THE
Religion
COMPONENT OF THE EDUCATION PROGRAM
The self-assessment of the degree to which this component of the school's education
program meets the Indicators of Quality for Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment
was conducted by the following process:
X A subcommittee comprised of the following individuals:
Committee Member’s Name Role in the School’s Community (e.g. teacher,
parent, student, etc.) Trish Canterino First Grade Teacher
Valerie Ludovico Second Grade Teacher
Sister Betty Bailey Religion Enrichment Teacher
Jackie Dryfoos Eighth Grade Teacher
Sue Genuario Physical Education Teacher
Melaine Blair Art Teacher
Sr. Barbara Jude Gentry Parish Director of Religious Education
X Survey of the school’s stakeholders using the Middle States Survey:
Total Number of Surveys Returned 298
The results represent surveys completed by:
Students 99
Parents 158
Faculty and Staff 30
Administrators 1
Board Members 10
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 157
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A. ISSUES RELATED TO THE INDICATORS OF QUALITY
The following requirements ask the school system to provide a self-assessment of
expectations for quality for curriculum, instruction, and assessment in this component
of the school's educational program. The information and data requested in this section
are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and data will assist the system
in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and its Indicators of
Quality.
1. CURRICULAR COMPONENT SUMMARY: On the chart below, summarize the
course/program offerings for this component of the education program by completing each column as
described.
Grade Level: Enter the grade level(s) at which each course/program in this curricular
component is taught.
Course Title: List the course/program titles or topics taught (e.g. Language Arts,
English IV, writing, journalism).
Hours per Semester/Year: Indicate the number of hours of instructional time devoted to each
program/ course per semester/year.
Grade Level(s)
Religious Curriculum Minutes per
Week
Kindergarten Religious Foundations: Creation, Trinity, Membership in
Christian Community, Sacraments, Celebration of Jesus
120
1st Love of God: Creation, Gifts of Jesus and the Holy Spirit,
Membership in God’s Family through Baptism
150
2nd God Makes Himself Known: Trinity, Mass, Sacraments
(Baptism, Reconciliation, Eucharist)
150
3rd God’s Love: Trinity, Sacraments (Baptism, Reconciliation,
Eucharist), God’s Law (Ten Commandments, Greatest
Commandment), Membership in Christian Community
175
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 158
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
4th God’s Plan for Moral Living: Ten Commandments, Jesus’ New
Commandment, Beatitudes, Works of Mercy, Sin, Reconciliation
175
5th Mystery of Christ in the Church: Sacraments of Initiation,
Healing, Vocation, Sacramentals
220
6th Sacred Scripture: Bible, Old Testament, Christ’s fulfillment of
the old Testament, Saints and Holy People
220
7th Life of Christ: Christ the Way (scripture, early life, Apostles and
Mary), Christ the Truth (parables, miracles, Beatitudes), and
Christ the Life (Sacraments, Holy Spirit)
220
8th Mystery of the Church: Marks of the Church, History of the
Church
Morality/Social Justice: Ten Commandments, Beatitudes, Works
of Mercy, Moral Decisions
220
2. Describe any gaps or omissions in the sequences of courses taught in this
component of the educational program. Provide a description of proposed
improvements and/or corrective actions that need to be taken. Include a description
of actions that have been initiated or are formally planned.
Religion is taught in grades K through 8, based on the Archdiocese of Philadelphia Religion Curriculum
guidelines. No gaps or omissions were detected in this component of the educational program.
3. Describe any unnecessary repetitions in the sequences of courses taught in this
component of the educational program. Provide a description of proposed
improvements and/or corrective actions that need to be taken. Include a description
of actions that have been initiated or are formally planned.
Although there is a spiraling content curriculum through the grade levels, the focus, scope, and
sequence differ according to the appropriate grade level until mastery is achieved. The
Archdiocesan Religion Curriculum sub-committee reviews the course sequence periodically and
makes changes to eliminate any unnecessary repetitions.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 159
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
4. ASSESSMENT RESULTS:
Name of Assessment/ Test
Area(s) Assessed Level of Student Performance
S NI U
Year-End Archdiocesan Final
Exam
Grade level religion
content
X
Year-End Archdiocesan Final
Performance Assessment
Application of grade-
level Religion
Curriculum
X
Various projects, chapter and
unit assessments, and oral
communication
Grade-level specific
religion content
X
4.a. Provide a description of proposed improvements and/or corrective actions that need
to be taken if a rating of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” is assigned.
Include a description of actions that have been initiated or are formally planned.
N/A
B. SELF-ASSESSMENT OF THE INDICATORS OF
QUALITY
The Indicators of Quality for Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
expectations for quality in its educational program.
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 160
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
INDICATORS OF QUALITY FOR CURRICULUM
Indicators for All Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
CI.1. The development of the curriculum is based on a
thorough assessment of the basic concepts, skills,
and knowledge required of all students to fulfill the
stated goals of the program.
X
CI.2.The curriculum has established priorities, objectives,
and goals for all courses and units within the
program that are based on clearly defined
expectations for all students.
X
CI.3. The curriculum is designed to ensure the alignment
of teaching strategies, learning activities,
instructional support, instructional resources, and
assessment.
X
CI.4. The curriculum defines desired student outcomes
as expressed in terms of student understanding,
knowledge, attitudes, skills, and habits.
X
CI.5. The curriculum provides experiences that promote
students’ critical thinking, reasoning, problem-
solving skills, and study skills.
X
CI.6. The learning expectations of the curriculum address
the diverse learning needs of the students without
compromising the essential knowledge and skills
students are expected to learn.
X
CI.7. Course objectives in the curriculum are simply
stated and understandable to students. X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 161
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
CI.8. The skills and knowledge of the curriculum are
well-articulated and coordinated between all
teachers at each grade level and by teachers across
grade levels.
X
CI.9. Elementary, middle level, and secondary level staff
members work cooperatively to provide a
meaningful, and logical progression of learning
activities in the curriculum.
X
CI.10. The curriculum is designed to foster active
involvement of students in the learning process. X
CI.11. Instructional activities in the curriculum provide
opportunities for both exploration and
specialization in the content.
X
CI.12. The curriculum’s objectives and expectations for
learning are understood and supported by the
school community’s stakeholders.
X
CI.13. Parents and students are provided appropriate
opportunities to provide input into the
development of curriculum.
N/A N/A N/A N/A
CI.14. Written curriculum guides identify objectives and
define the scope and sequence of the curriculum.
The guides are functional and in use.
X
CI.15. Learning materials used in the curriculum are
current and are selected to fulfill the goals and
objectives of the curriculum.
X
CI.16. Current best practices in, including the use of
technology and other media, are considered in the
selection of learning materials and media.
X
CI.17. Decisions made regarding the curriculum are
based on data about student performance,
knowledge about organizational development, and
research about best practices in curriculum,
instruction, and assessment.
X
CI.18. The content and instructional activities in the
curriculum are consistent with the school’s
philosophy/mission.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 162
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
CI.19. Administrative leadership and support are
provided in the coordination and articulation of the
curriculum.
X
CI.20. The curriculum is reviewed and evaluated
regularly and systematically. The curriculum
review/evaluation process includes safeguards to
ensure that the written curriculum is actually
taught. The review process focuses on what is to be
deleted from the curriculum as well as what is to be
added.
X
Other:
Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
N/A: There were no comments about Religion curriculum from any of the stakeholders
Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
N/A
INDICATORS OF QUALITY FOR INSTRUCTION
Indicators for All Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
II.1. A variety of teaching strategies and techniques is
used to meet the needs of individual students in the
curriculum.
X
II.2. The scope and pacing of lessons in the curriculum X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 163
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
are appropriate for the students.
II.3. Provision is made for appropriate amounts of
learning time for all aspects of the curriculum. X
II.4. Students are provided with additional assistance to
address specific learning challenges in the
curriculum when needed.
X
II.5. Students and teachers demonstrate mutual respect
toward each other in classes. X
II.6. Students demonstrate an understanding of cultural
differences by maintaining respect for each other in
classes.
X
II.7. Class sizes promote and allow for varied
instructional strategies to be used. X
II.8. Meaningful and frequent communications with
parents are used to promote student learning in the
curriculum.
X
II.9. Members of the faculty are qualified, competent, and
dedicated to the objectives of the curriculum. X
II.10. Members of the faculty maintain safe, positive, and
supportive classroom environments. X
II.11.The faculty is provided with continuing
professional growth activities that support the
effective fulfillment of curriculum objectives.
Support for effective use of research-based
instructional practices is provided to teachers.
X
Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
A few parent stakeholders perceived that more emphasis should be placed on values and
religious beliefs in all aspects of instruction throughout the day.
Many parent and student stakeholders commented that our school provides a quality
education coupled with a strong religious foundation which teaches the children to be
thoughtful and considerate at all times as expressed below:
o I feel my children enjoy their Catholic faith
o SSJ is a great school that provides children with a quality faith-based education
o I can see that my children's faith has grown since attending SSJ
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 164
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
o The religion teachers are angels doing God’s work in our school. We are
fortunate to have such faith filled and gifted religious teachers. They inspire our
children to follow God and act as Jesus would.
A few parent and teacher stakeholders commented that community service programs
need to be incorporated more into this faith-based school.
Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
N/A
INDICATORS OF QUALITY FOR ASSESSMENT
Indicators for All Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
AI.1. Assessment of student learning and performance is
aligned with curriculum and instruction in the
curriculum
X
AI.2. A variety of methods for assessing student learning
is used in the curriculum. X
AI.3. Assessment results in the curriculum are analyzed
with appropriate frequency and rigor for
individual students as they move through courses
in the curriculum.
X
a. Assessment results in the curriculum are analyzed
with appropriate frequency and rigor for cohorts
of students as they move through courses in the
curriculum.
X
b Assessment results in the curriculum are analyzed
with appropriate frequency and rigor for
comparable (local, state, and national) groups
outside of the school.
N/A N/A N/A N/A
AI.4. The assessment of student learning and
performance in the curriculum enables students to X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 165
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
monitor their own learning progress and teachers
to adapt their instruction to students’ specific
learning needs.
AI.5. Records of students’ learning and performance are
maintained in the curriculum. X
AI.6. Timely and useful evaluative information and
feedback regarding learning in the curriculum is
provided to students and parents (as appropriate).
X
AI.7. Assessment data on student learning are used to
measure the presence or absence of achievement in
the curriculum.
X
AI.8. Assessment data on student learning are used to
identify students needing additional support in the
curriculum.
X
AI.9. Placement/enrollment in courses in the curriculum
is based on a thorough analysis of students’
interests and potential as well as on students' past
performance.
N/A N/A N/A N/A
AI.10. Students in the curriculum are learning and
performing at levels expected, or progress is being
made to raise results accordingly.
X
Other:
Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
N/A: There were not any stakeholder comments regarding religion assessments
Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
N/A
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 166
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
C. ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS
Curriculum Design Issues
Content
Are the skills required for
improvement in student
performance included in the
current curriculum?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Sequence
Are the skills required for
improvement in student
performance scheduled to be
taught before the administration
of the assessment?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Pacing
Are the skills required for
improvement in student
performance given sufficient time
in the current pacing of the
curriculum?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Format
Are the skills required for
improvement in student
performance taught in a format
consistent with the format in
which they will be tested?
X YES NO
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 167
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Curriculum Delivery Issues
Teacher Awareness of Content
Are teachers aware that the skills
required for improvement in
student performance are included
in the current curriculum?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Teacher Awareness of Sequencing
Are teachers aware that the skills
required for improvement in
student performance are
scheduled to be taught prior to
the administration of the
assessment?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Teacher Awareness of Pacing
Are teachers spending the
specified time on the skills
required for improvement in
student performance?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 168
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Teacher Awareness of Format
Are teachers aware of the
assessment objectives and the
format in which the skills required
for improvement in student
performance will be tested?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Teacher Resources
Do teachers have the resources
they will need to provide initial
instruction and supplementary or
remedial instruction and
formative assessment of the skills
required for improvement in
student performance?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Teacher Skills
Do teachers have the professional
knowledge and skills to teach
students the skills required for
improvement in student
performance?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 169
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
C.1 Describe any improvements related to this component of the educational program
made within the past five years.
Religious Enrichment classes added in grades K-4
Mission statement updated and belief statements added, all of which reflect Catholic
Identity
New edition of religion and Confirmation books selected
Peacemaker awards correlated with a particular virtue and a saint that models that virtue
presented monthly
Middle School service projects added at some levels
Peace Committee established to promote respect for all
C.2 List the significant strengths of the school in this component of the educational
program.
IHM sisters are actively present in the school community.
A spiraling curriculum from K-8 is in place.
Catechetical certification is being obtained or maintained by all teachers as indicated by
diocesan mandate.
Opportunities are provided for teachers to pursue personal spiritual enrichment through
the parish and community.
Evidence of Catholic Identity is represented throughout the classroom and hallway
displays.
Catholic Identity is reinforced in daily school activities.
o First Friday school Masses, along with homeroom weekly Masses
o Scripture reflections and prayer at morning assembly
o Prayer throughout the day: before lunch, after lunch, at the end of the day, at the
beginning and end of each class
o Prayer services during the liturgical year
o Stations of the Cross
o Marian Devotions
o Activities focusing on liturgical seasons, such as Advent, Christmas, Lent, Easter
o Weekly mission collections
o Sacrament preparation including regular religion class lessons and activities,
parent meetings, and retreat days for each sacramental group
o Reception of the Sacraments of the Eucharist, Reconciliation, and Confirmation
as a parish celebration honored within the school community
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 170
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
C.3 List the significant areas for improvement of the school in this component of the
educational program.
Although this self-study indicates that our school provides a quality, faith-based education, we
can continue to enrich the religion curriculum in the following ways:
Incorporate Catholic Identity and faith-based values more intentionally in all subject
areas
Upgrade religious audio-visual resources
Actively encourage full and appropriate Mass participation, especially singing
Investigate and consider using the ACRE test
Incorporate more opportunities for community service at all grade levels
C.4 Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any important next
steps or strategic priorities related to this component of the educational program that
should be included in the action plans in the Plan for Growth and Improvement.
Although this self-study indicates that the school provides a quality, faith-based education, plans
will continue to enrich the religion curriculum in the following ways:
Mission statement will be printed and posted in each classroom.
Doctrine, Scripture, Gospel values, and service will be areas of focus when choosing the
new religion series.
Full and appropriate Mass participation will be encouraged with special attention given to
liturgical music.
Faculty will collaborate on ways to incorporate Catholic Identity and faith values in all
subject areas.
Religious DVD/CDs will be purchased as funds permit.
Faculty will increase student participation in community service projects.
The school and parish community will continue to celebrate the Peacemaker of the
Month.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 171
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
SELF-ASSESSMENT OF THE INDICATORS OF
QUALITY FOR CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION, AND
ASSESSMENT IN THE
Math
COMPONENT OF THE EDUCATION PROGRAM
The self-assessment of the degree to which this component of the school's education
program meets the Indicators of Quality for Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment
was conducted by the following process:
X A subcommittee comprised of the following individuals:
Committee Member’s
Name Role in the School’s Community (e.g. teacher, parent, student,
etc.)
Ashley Davis Honors Math and Grade 8 Math
Michelle Kelly 5th and 6th grade Math
Adrienne Ruppert 7th grade Math and Religion; 8th grade math
Diane Glatts Kindergarten
Rob McNamara Technology
Susan Mobile 4th grade
X Survey of the school’s stakeholders using
the Middle States Survey:
Total Number of Surveys Returned 298
The results represent surveys completed by:
Students 99
Parents 158
Faculty and Staff 30
Administrators 1
Board Members (financial section only) 10
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 172
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
D. ISSUES RELATED TO THE INDICATORS OF QUALITY
The following requirements ask the school system to provide a self-assessment of
expectations for quality for curriculum, instruction, and assessment in this component
of the school's educational program. The information and data requested in this section
are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and data will assist the system
in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and its Indicators of
Quality.
5. CURRICULAR COMPONENT SUMMARY: On the chart below, summarize the
course/program offerings for this component of the education program by completing each column as
described.
Grade Level: Enter the grade level(s) at which each course/program in this curricular
component is taught.
Course Title: List the course/program titles or topics taught (e.g. Language Arts,
English IV, writing, journalism).
Hours per Semester/Year: Indicate the number of hours of instructional time devoted to each
program/ course per semester/year.
Grade
Level(s)
Math Curriculum Minutes
per Week
K Counting and Cardinality; Operations and Algebraic Thinking;
Number and Operations in Base Ten; Measurement and Data;
Geometry
150
1 Operations and Algebraic Thinking; Number and Operations in Base
Ten; Measurement and Data; Geometry
225
2 Operations and Algebraic Thinking; Number and Operations in Base
Ten; Measurement and Data; Geometry
225
3 Operations and Algebraic Thinking; Number and Operations in Base
Ten; Number and Operations- Fractions; Measurement and Data;
Geometry
225
4 Operations and Algebraic Thinking; Number and Operations in Base
Ten; Number and Operations- Fractions; Measurement and Data;
Geometry
225
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 173
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
5 Operations and Algebraic Thinking; Number and Operations in Base
Ten; Number and Operations- Fractions; Measurement and Data;
Geometry
275
6 Ratios and Proportional Relationships; The Number System;
Expressions and Equations; Geometry; Statistics and Probability
275
7 Ratios and Proportional Relationships; The Number System;
Expressions and Equations; Geometry; Statistics and Probability
275
8 The Number System; Expressions and Equations; Functions;
Geometry; Statistics and Probability
275
5 Honors Math; Operations and Algebraic Thinking; Number and
Operations in Base Ten; Number and Operations- Fractions;
Measurement and Data; Geometry
275
6 Honors Math; Ratios and Proportional Relationships; The Number
System; Expressions and Equations; Geometry; Statistics and
Probability
275
7 Honors Math; Ratios and Proportional Relationships; The Number
System; Expressions and Equations; Geometry; Statistics and
Probability
275
8 Honors Math; The Number System; Expressions and Equations;
Functions; Geometry; Statistics and Probability
275
6. Describe any gaps or omissions in the sequences of courses taught in this
component of the educational program. Provide a description of proposed
improvements and/or corrective actions that need to be taken. Include a description
of actions that have been initiated or are formally planned.
In 2012-2013, K to 6 began using a new series, Go Math, which follows CCSS. 7th Grade used
Sadlier Fundamentals of Algebra. 8th Grade used a pre-algebra textbook, Prentice Hall Pre-
Algebra. For Honors Math, 7th Grade used Prentice Hall Pre-Algebra and 8th Grade used
Prentice Hall Algebra. The gaps have occurred due to the gradual implementation of the CCSS
aligned texts.
In 2013-2014, grade 8 Honors math class began using Prentice Hall Common Core Algebra 1
textbook.
For the 2014-2015 school year, the plans are to utilize the Common Core Algebra 1 textbook in
all of 8th grade.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 174
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
The future plan is to purchase a Common Core 7th Grade Pre-Algebra textbook.
7. Describe any unnecessary repetitions in the sequences of courses taught in this
component of the educational program. Provide a description of proposed
improvements and/or corrective actions that need to be taken. Include a description
of actions that have been initiated or are formally planned. Not applicable, no repetitions.
8. ASSESSMENT RESULTS:
Name of
Assessment Sub-Group of
Students Grade
Level Percentage of Student
Performance Standard is
defined as 50%
Terra Nova All 2 Math- 59 Above Standard
2 Math - 28 At Standard
2 Math - 3 Below Standard
3 Math- 76 Above Standard
3 Math- 23 At Standard
3 Math- 0.8 Below Standard
4 Math- 69 Above Standard
4 Math- 29 At Standard
4 Math- 2 Below Standard
5 Math- 64 Above Standard
5 Math- 36 At Standard
5 Math- 0.2 Below Standard
6 Math- 56 Above Standard
6 Math- 40 At Standard
6 Math- 5 Below Standard
7 Math- 70 Above Standard
7 Math- 30 At Standard
7 Math- 0 Below Standard
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 175
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
School Level End of Year Assessment Test
GRADE
IN 2012-
13
Total Number
of Students in
Grade
Number of
Students
Passing (70 or
higher)
Percentage of
Students
Passing (70 or
higher)
Number of
Students meeting
85% or higher
requirement for
proficiency
Percentage of
students meeting
85% or higher
requirement for
proficiency
Grade 1 41 41 100% 39 95%
Grade 2 50 49 98% 45 90%
Grade 3 41 41 100% 34 82%
Grade 4 46 46 100% 32 69%
Grade 5 33 27 81% 18 54%
Grade 6 34 21 61% 6 17%
Grade 7 31 25 80% 17 54%
The 2012-2013 school year was the first year a new math series in grades K – 6 was implemented. It
was the second year of the adoption of the Common Core State Standards.
School End of Year Final Grades
GRADE
IN 2012-
13
Total Number
of Students in
Grade
Number of
Students
Passing (70 or
higher)
Percentage of
Students
Passing (70 or
higher)
Number of
Students meeting
85% or higher
requirement for
proficiency
Percentage of
students meeting
85% or higher
requirement for
proficiency
Grade 1 41 41 100% 38 92%
Grade 2 50 50 100% 46 92%
Grade 3 41 41 100% 35 85%
Grade 4 46 46 100% 34 73%
Grade 5 33 33 100% 26 78%
Grade 6 34 34 100% 31 91%
Grade 7 31 31 100% 22 70%
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 176
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
4.a. Provide a description of proposed improvements and/or corrective actions that need
to be taken if a rating of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” is assigned.
Include a description of actions that have been initiated or are formally planned.
When indicators show that a student is below standard in Math one or more of several things
happen:
1. Teachers apply necessary accommodations within the regular classroom setting.
2. A conference with the parents is requested.
3. IU services or private tutoring is recommended.
4. The child is referred for a child study.
5. A school psychologist may be consulted.
6. A follow-up meeting is held to formulate an educational plan.
E. SELF-ASSESSMENT OF THE INDICATORS OF
QUALITY
The Indicators of Quality for Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
expectations for quality in its educational program.
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
INDICATORS OF QUALITY FOR CURRICULUM
Indicators for All Schools
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 177
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
CI.1. The development of the curriculum is based on a
thorough assessment of the basic concepts, skills,
and knowledge required of all students to fulfill
the stated goals of the program.
X
CI.2.The curriculum has established priorities,
objectives, and goals for all courses and units
within the program that are based on clearly
defined expectations for all students.
X
CI.3. The curriculum is designed to ensure the
alignment of teaching strategies, learning
activities, instructional support, instructional
resources, and assessment.
X
CI.4. The curriculum defines desired student outcomes
as expressed in terms of student understanding,
knowledge, attitudes, skills, and habits.
X
CI.5. The curriculum provides experiences that
promote students’ critical thinking, reasoning,
problem-solving skills, and study skills.
X
CI.6. The learning expectations of the curriculum
address the diverse learning needs of the students
without compromising the essential knowledge
and skills students are expected to learn.
X
CI.7. Course objectives in the curriculum are simply
stated and understandable to students. X
CI.8. The skills and knowledge of the curriculum are
well-articulated and coordinated between all
teachers at each grade level and by teachers
across grade levels.
X
CI.9. Elementary, middle level, and secondary level
staff members work cooperatively to provide a
meaningful, and logical progression of learning
activities in the curriculum.
X
CI.10. The curriculum is designed to foster active
involvement of students in the learning process. X
CI.11. Instructional activities in the curriculum provide X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 178
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
opportunities for both exploration and
specialization in the content.
CI.12. The curriculum’s objectives and expectations for
learning are understood and supported by the
school community’s stakeholders.
X
CI.13. Parents and students are provided appropriate
opportunities to provide input into the
development of curriculum.
N/A N/A N/A N/A
CI.14. Written curriculum guides identify objectives
and define the scope and sequence of the
curriculum. The guides are functional and in use.
X
CI.15. Learning materials used in the curriculum are
current and are selected to fulfill the goals and
objectives of the curriculum.
X
CI.16. Current best practices, including the use of
technology and other media, are considered in the
selection of learning materials and media.
X
CI.17. Decisions made regarding the curriculum are
based on data about student performance,
knowledge about organizational development,
and research about best practices in curriculum,
instruction, and assessment.
X
CI.18. The content and instructional activities in the
curriculum are consistent with the school’s
philosophy/mission.
X
CI.19. Administrative leadership and support are
provided in the coordination and articulation of
the curriculum.
X
CI.20. The curriculum is reviewed and evaluated
regularly and systematically. The curriculum
review/evaluation process includes safeguards to
ensure that the written curriculum is actually
taught. The review process focuses on what is to
be deleted from the curriculum as well as what is
to be added.
N/A
This is
done at
diocesan
level.
Other:
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 179
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
There were no comments given in the stakeholder survey that fit Quality for Curriculum.
Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
CI8 Faculty does not meet on a regular basis to articulate and coordinate curriculum
between grade levels.
INDICATORS OF QUALITY FOR INSTRUCTION
Indicators for All Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
II.1. A variety of teaching strategies and techniques is
used to meet the needs of individual students in the
curriculum.
X
II.2. The scope and pacing of lessons in the curriculum
are appropriate for the students. X
II.3. Provision is made for appropriate amounts of
learning time for all aspects of the curriculum. X
II.4. Students are provided with additional assistance to
address specific learning challenges in the
curriculum when needed.
X
II.5. Students and teachers demonstrate mutual respect
toward each other in classes. X
II.6. Students demonstrate an understanding of cultural
differences by maintaining respect for each other in
classes.
X
II.7. Class sizes promote and allow for varied
instructional strategies to be used. X
II.8. Meaningful and frequent communications with X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 180
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
parents are used to promote student learning in the
curriculum.
II.9. Members of the faculty are qualified, competent, and
dedicated to the objectives of the curriculum. X
II.10. Members of the faculty maintain safe, positive, and
supportive classroom environments. X
II.11.The faculty is provided with continuing
professional growth activities that support the
effective fulfillment of curriculum objectives.
Support for effective use of research-based
instructional practices is provided to teachers.
X
Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
There were no comments given in the stakeholder survey that fit Quality for Instruction.
Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
N/A
INDICATORS OF QUALITY FOR ASSESSMENT
Indicators for All Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 181
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
1 2 3 4
AI.1. Assessment of student learning and performance is
aligned with curriculum and instruction in the
curriculum
X
AI.2. A variety of methods for assessing student learning
is used in the curriculum. X
AI.3. Assessment results in the curriculum are analyzed
with appropriate frequency and rigor for
individual students as they move through courses
in the curriculum.
X
o Assessment results in the curriculum are
analyzed with appropriate frequency and
rigor for cohorts of students as they move
through courses in the curriculum.
X
o Assessment results in the curriculum are
analyzed with appropriate frequency and
rigor for comparable (local, state, and
national) groups outside of the school.
X
AI.4. The assessment of student learning and
performance in the curriculum enables students to
monitor their own learning progress and teachers
to adapt their instruction to students’ specific
learning needs.
X
AI.5. Records of students’ learning and performance are
maintained in the curriculum. X
AI.6. Timely and useful evaluative information and
feedback regarding learning in the curriculum is
provided to students and parents (as appropriate).
X
AI.7. Assessment data on student learning are used to
measure the presence or absence of achievement in
the curriculum.
X
AI.8. Assessment data on student learning are used to
identify students needing additional support in the
curriculum.
X
AI.9. Placement/enrollment in courses in the curriculum
is based on a thorough analysis of students’
interests and potential as well as on students' past
performance.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 182
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
AI.10. Students in the curriculum are learning and
performing at levels expected, or progress is being
made to raise results accordingly.
X
Other:
Stakeholders’ comments below support the ratings.
"As we begin to pursue HS [high school] options, I have been told by potential HS
options that our students are not prepared in math. Unless your child is in Honors math
5th grade on, your math preparedness may be challenged."
"Disappointed in why Honors Math is only based on Terra Nova scores when grades
have been in the A average range. I also don’t agree that tracking doesn’t begin until 6th
grade. My child is bored being in a class where many of the students are behind and she
is doing work that is not even challenging. If children are pulled out for the class for
extra help then there is no reason why some children can’t be pulled out for a higher level
math class."
Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
AI 3b Comparing results at the local and national level is possible with Terra Nova, but
not at the state level due to different standardized tests.
AI 9
While it is true in most instances that the Archdiocesan guidelines for admittance to
the Honors Math program are followed, exceptions have been made due to parent
requests after consultation with the Honors Math teacher and Sister Jeannine.
Additionally, grouping was not based upon interest or potential in the past with the
exception of Honors Math. However, beginning in September 2014 grouping will be
based on potential.
F. ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS
Curriculum Design Issues
Content
Are the skills required for X YES NO
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 183
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
improvement in student
performance included in the
current curriculum?
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Sequence
Are the skills required for
improvement in student
performance scheduled to be
taught before the administration
of the assessment?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Pacing
Are the skills required for
improvement in student
performance given sufficient time
in the current pacing of the
curriculum?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Format
Are the skills required for
improvement in student
performance taught in a format
consistent with the format in
which they will be tested?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Curriculum Delivery Issues
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 184
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Teacher Awareness of Content
Are teachers aware that the skills
required for improvement in
student performance are included
in the current curriculum?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Teacher Awareness of Sequencing
Are teachers aware that the skills
required for improvement in
student performance are
scheduled to be taught prior to the
administration of the assessment?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Teacher Awareness of Pacing
Are teachers spending the
specified time on the skills
required for improvement in
student performance?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Teacher Awareness of Format
Are teachers aware of the
assessment objectives and the
format in which the skills required
for improvement in student
performance will be tested?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 185
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Teacher Resources
Do teachers have the resources
they will need to provide initial
instruction and supplementary or
remedial instruction and
formative assessment of the skills
required for improvement in
student performance?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Teacher Skills
Do teachers have the professional
knowledge and skills to teach
students the skills required for
improvement in student
performance?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
C.1 Describe any improvements related to this component of the educational program
made within the past five years.
First in Math was introduced in grades 1-8 in September 2011. In 2014-2015, plans are
to continue its use in grade K-4. Grades 5-8 will use Simple Solutions.
Go Math Series was introduced in grades K-6 in September 2012.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 186
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Faculty has been trained in Common Core Standards by attending workshops provided by
the Chester County Intermediate Unit and various textbook publishers.
C.2 List the significant strengths of the school in this component of the educational
program.
Teachers are implementing the Go Math Series daily in grades K-6.
Go Math Series is perfectly aligned with Common Core Standards.
The students are supported by an Honors Math program and remedial math services from
the Intermediate Unit.
C.3 List the significant areas for improvement of the school in this component of the
educational program.
SS. Simon and Jude school is striving for stronger continuity in the middle school grade
textbooks, i.e. same publisher.
The school is emphasizing math modeling in all grades, i.e. graphing, drawing examples,
using manipulatives, and justifying equation solutions.
The school is emphasizing communication in all grades, i.e. math journal, written explanations
of math strategies, as well as verbal explanation of problem solutions.
C.4 Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any important next
steps or strategic priorities related to this component of the educational program that
should be included in the action plans in the Plan for Growth and Improvement.
New Common Core aligned textbooks for 8th grade will be introduced in 2014-2015 with
similar plans for 7th grade in 2015-2016.
Meetings of math teachers to review continuity of program and forms of assessment will
be held one or more times per trimester.
Criteria will be developed and implemented for leveling students in grades 4-8
Workshops that emphasize communication and modeling in math will be made available.
Honors math will be offered to 4th grade students beginning with the 2014-2015
academic year.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 187
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
SELF-ASSESSMENT OF THE INDICATORS OF
QUALITY FOR CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION, AND
ASSESSMENT IN THE
English Language Arts
COMPONENT OF THE EDUCATION PROGRAM The self-assessment of the degree to which this component of the school's education program meets
the Indicators of Quality for Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment was conducted by the following
process:
X A subcommittee comprised of the following individuals:
Committee Member’s
Name Role in the School’s Community (e.g. teacher, parent, student,
etc.)
Jan Battista librarian
Cindy Connell 6th grade teacher
Danielle Land kindergarten teacher
Lauren Lehane 2nd grade teacher
Melissa Murphy 7th grade teacher
Christina Rosci 5th grade teacher
X Survey of the school’s stakeholders using
the Middle States Survey:
Total Number of Surveys Returned 298
The results represent surveys completed by:
Students 99
Parents 158
Faculty and Staff 30
Administrators 1
Board Members (financial section only) 10
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 188
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
G. ISSUES RELATED TO THE INDICATORS OF QUALITY
The following requirements ask the school system to provide a self-assessment of
expectations for quality for curriculum, instruction, and assessment in this component
of the school's educational program. The information and data requested in this section
are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and data will assist the system
in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and its Indicators of
Quality.
9. CURRICULAR COMPONENT SUMMARY: On the chart below, summarize the
course/program offerings for this component of the education program by completing each column as
described.
Grade Level: Enter the grade level(s) at which each course/program in this curricular
component is taught.
Course Title: List the course/program titles or topics taught (e.g. Language Arts,
English IV, writing, journalism).
Hours per Semester/Year: Indicate the number of hours of instructional time devoted to each
program/ course per semester/year.
Grade
Level(s)
English Language Arts Curriculum Minutes
per week
Kindergarten
Reading phonemic awareness, phonics (print awareness, alphabetic
knowledge, alphabetic principle, decoding, high-frequency word
knowledge), oral reading fluency, vocabulary, reading
comprehension (literal, inferential and critical-analysis)
Writing focus on the topic, demonstrating understanding of purpose,
penmanship, writing coherent sentences and interesting word choice
and sentence variety
Language vocabulary, sentence structure, grammar, punctuation, capitalization
and spelling
Speaking and Listening listening comprehension, organization and delivery of oral
360
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 189
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
communication, retellings, relating personal experiences and
providing descriptions
1st grade Reading phonemic awareness, phonics (print awareness, alphabetic
knowledge, alphabetic principle, decoding, high-frequency word
knowledge), oral reading fluency, vocabulary, reading
comprehension (literal, inferential and critical-analysis)
Writing focus on the topic, demonstrating understanding of purpose,
penmanship, writing coherent sentences and interesting word choice
and sentence variety
Language vocabulary, sentence structure, grammar, punctuation, capitalization
and spelling
Speaking and Listening listening comprehension, organization and delivery of oral
communication, retellings, relating personal experiences and
providing descriptions
855
2nd grade Reading phonemic awareness (isolating, blending, segmenting, adding,
deleting and substituting phonemes), phonics (print awareness,
alphabetic knowledge, alphabetic principle, decoding and knowledge
of high-frequency words), oral reading fluency (proper decoding and
expression), vocabulary (context clues, word structure, use of
dictionaries), reading comprehension using literal, inferential and
critical-analysis questions
Writing focus on the topic, write coherent sentences and paragraphs with
topic sentence, organizational structure, understanding of purpose,
use of facts, details and examples, interesting word choice and
sentence variety, friendly and formal letters, narrative, descriptive
and expository compositions, understanding of reference materials,
evaluation and revision of writing and penmanship
Language sentence structure, grammar (singular/plural constructions,
contractions, subject-verb agreement, parts of speech), punctuation,
capitalization and spelling
Speaking and Listening listening comprehension, organization and delivery of oral
communication, analysis and evaluation of oral and media
communication, recitation, retellings, relating personal experiences,
and providing descriptions
855
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 190
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
3rd grade Reading phonemic awareness (isolating, blending, segmenting, adding,
deleting and substituting phonemes), phonics (print awareness,
alphabetic knowledge, alphabetic principle, decoding and knowledge
of high-frequency words), oral reading fluency (proper decoding and
expression), vocabulary (context clues, word structure, use of
dictionaries), reading comprehension using literal, inferential and
critical-analysis questions
Writing focus on the topic, write coherent sentences and paragraphs with
topic sentence, organizational structure, understanding of purpose,
use of facts, details and examples, interesting word choice and
sentence variety, friendly and formal letters, narrative, descriptive
and expository compositions, understanding of reference materials,
evaluation and revision of writing and penmanship
Language sentence structure, grammar (singular/plural constructions,
contractions, subject-verb agreement, parts of speech), punctuation,
capitalization, conventions, and spelling
Speaking and Listening listening comprehension, organization and delivery of oral
communication, analysis and evaluation of oral and media
communication, recitation, retellings, relating personal experiences,
and providing descriptions
710
4th grade Reading Correct use of reading strategies as covered in the common core
curriculum (main idea vs. details, facts vs. opinions, summarization,
prediction and purpose setting, compare and contrast, cause and
effect, drawing conclusions, self questioning, theme recognition,
analyzing graphic sources, recognizing author’s purpose, making
inferences, generalizations in reading, ); use of literary elements
(character development and basic plot elements in story)
Writing Explanatory writing, persuasive writing, and description of a specific
character to supplement study of story grammar. New skills to be
assessed include stating a clear position or topic, developing facts
and opinions with details and solid reasoning, using strong language
and description in writing, and logical organization of information.
Language Vocabulary skills: using prefixes, suffixes, and word roots to
determine meaning, unfamiliar word strategies, contextual clues,
Latin and Greek roots and affixes, synonyms, antonyms, correct use
of dictionary and correct use of a thesaurus.
New Grammar Skills: relative pronouns, progressive verb tenses,
710
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 191
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
auxiliary verb use, conventional patterns, introduction to
prepositional phrases, classifying fragments and run-ons
spelling
Speaking and Listening Flexible communication and collaboration with classmates, oral
presentations, paraphrase ideas when speaking about a reading or
text, integrating information from oral, visual, quantitative and
media sources, Reader’s Theatre
5th grade Reading Correct use of reading strategies as covered in the common core
curriculum (main idea vs. details, facts vs. opinions, summarization,
prediction and purpose setting, compare and contrast, cause and
effect, drawing conclusions, self questioning, theme recognition,
analyzing graphic sources, recognizing author’s purpose, making
inferences, generalizations in reading, ); use of literary elements
(character development, setting of story, theme of story, rising
actions, problem, climax, and resolution)
Writing Narrative writing, expository writing, persuasive writing, and
writing for tests. New skills to be assessed include the use of
descriptive language, use of persuasive techniques in writing, use of
graphic sources and informational captions to enhance the
explanation, correct use of the writing process with a focus on
revising and editing, correct use of conventions, spelling,
punctuation, capitalization
Language Vocabulary skills: using prefixes, suffixes, and word roots to
determine meaning, unfamiliar word strategies, contextual clues,
Latin and Greek roots and affixes, synonyms, antonyms, correct use
of a dictionary and correct use of a thesaurus.
New Grammar Skills: prepositions, prepositional phrases, correcting
run-ons and fragments, coordinate & subordinate conjunctions, and
interjections
Spelling
Speaking and Listening Flexible communication and collaboration with classmates, oral
presentations, informal oral presentations, listening
comprehension/assessments, integrating information from oral,
visual, quantitative and media sources, Reader’s Theatre
420
6th grade Reading fiction/nonfiction comprehension and reading response
Writing performance assessments, journals and reading response
420
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 192
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Language vocabulary, grammar and spelling
Listening and Speaking listening comprehension, oral presentations, read aloud and class
participation
7th grade Reading fiction/nonfiction comprehension and reading response
Writing performance assessments, journals and reading response
Language vocabulary, grammar and spelling
Listening and Speaking listening comprehension, oral presentations and class participation
420
8th grade Reading analysis of plot development through the use of literature/novels
Writing research-based using credible sources and citation of sources
Language vocabulary, grammar and spelling
Listening and Speaking debate and improvement of listening activities
420
10. Describe any gaps or omissions in the sequences of courses taught in this
component of the educational program. Provide a description of proposed
improvements and/or corrective actions that need to be taken. Include a description
of actions that have been initiated or are formally planned.
There are no recognizable gaps or omissions because the Common Core Standards have been
incorporated into our archdiocesan guidelines.
11. Describe any unnecessary repetitions in the sequences of courses taught in this
component of the educational program. Provide a description of proposed
improvements and/or corrective actions that need to be taken. Include a description
of actions that have been initiated or are formally planned.
There are no recognizable repetitions in the curriculum because it was designed so students
establish mastery by learning, understanding and building on foundational skills and applications
from year to year in order to be better prepared for higher learning.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 193
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
12. ASSESSMENT RESULTS: FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2012 -- 2013
Name of
Assessment Sub-Group of
Students Grade
Level(s) Percentage of Student
Performance[2]
Terra Nova All 2 Reading - 72 Above
Standard
2 Reading - 27 At Standard
2 Reading - 1 Below
Standard
3 Reading - 65
Language - 72
Above
Standard
3 Reading - 35
Language - 28
At Standard
3 Reading - 0.2
Language - 0.8
Below
Standard
4
Reading - 71
Language - 51
Above
Standard
4 Reading - 27
Language - 47
At Standard
4 Reading - 1
Language - 1
Below
Standard
5 Reading - 73
Language - 65
Above
Standard
5 Reading - 26
Language - 33
At Standard
5 Reading - 0.3
Language - 2
Below
Standard
6
Reading - 77
Language - 64
Above
Standard
6 Reading - 23
Language - 36
At Standard
6 Reading - 0 Below
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 194
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Language -0 Standard
7
Reading - 71
Language - 65
Above
Standard
7 Reading - 29
Language - 35
At Standard
7 Reading - 0
Language - 0
Below
Standard
Other Assessments:
Name of Assessment/ Test
Area(s)
Assessed Level of Student
Performance
NI U
Unit Benchmark Assessments (K-5) Reading S
End-of-Year Benchmark Assessments (K-5)
Reading S
Reading Comprehension Assessments
(Fiction/Nonfiction) (6-8) Reading S
Unit Benchmark Assessments (K-5) Writing S
End-of-Year Benchmark Assessments (K-5) Writing S
Writing Rubric Samples Writing S
Common Core Required Performance
Assessments (6-8) Writing S
Vocabulary Development (4-8) Language S
Grammar and Spelling Development (K-8) Language S
Listening Comprehension (K-8) Listening and
Speaking S
Performance Assessments/Oral Presentations
(1-8) Listening and
Speaking S
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 195
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
4.a. Provide a description of proposed improvements and/or corrective actions that need
to be taken if a rating of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” is assigned.
Include a description of actions that have been initiated or are formally planned.
When indicators show that a student is below standard in reading or language one or more of the
following may occur:
1. Teachers apply necessary accommodations within the regular classroom setting.
2. A conference with the parents is requested.
3. IU services or private tutoring is recommended.
4. The child is referred for Child Study.
5. A school psychologist is consulted.
6. A follow-up meeting is held to formulate an educational plan.
H. SELF-ASSESSMENT OF THE INDICATORS OF
QUALITY
The Indicators of Quality for Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
expectations for quality in its educational program.
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 196
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
INDICATORS OF QUALITY FOR CURRICULUM
Indicators for All Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
CI.1. The development of the curriculum is based on a
thorough assessment of the basic concepts, skills,
and knowledge required of all students to fulfill
the stated goals of the program.
X
CI.2.The curriculum has established priorities,
objectives, and goals for all courses and units
within the program that are based on clearly
defined expectations for all students.
X
CI.3. The curriculum is designed to ensure the
alignment of teaching strategies, learning
activities, instructional support, instructional
resources, and assessment.
X
CI.4. The curriculum defines desired student outcomes
as expressed in terms of student understanding,
knowledge, attitudes, skills, and habits.
X
CI.5. The curriculum provides experiences that
promote students’ critical thinking, reasoning,
problem-solving skills, and study skills.
X
CI.6. The learning expectations of the curriculum
address the diverse learning needs of the students
without compromising the essential knowledge
and skills students are expected to learn.
X
CI.7. Course objectives in the curriculum are simply
stated and understandable to students. X
CI.8. The skills and knowledge of the curriculum are
well-articulated and coordinated between all
teachers at each grade level and by teachers
across grade levels.
X
CI.9. Elementary, middle level, and secondary level
staff members work cooperatively to provide a
meaningful, and logical progression of learning
activities in the curriculum.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 197
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
CI.10. The curriculum is designed to foster active
involvement of students in the learning process. X
CI.11. Instructional activities in the curriculum provide
opportunities for both exploration and
specialization in the content.
X
CI.12. The curriculum’s objectives and expectations for
learning are understood and supported by the
school community’s stakeholders.
X
CI.13. Parents and students are provided appropriate
opportunities to provide input into the
development of curriculum.
N/A N/A N/A N/A
CI.14. Written curriculum guides identify objectives
and define the scope and sequence of the
curriculum. The guides are functional and in use.
X
CI.15. Learning materials used in the curriculum are
current and are selected to fulfill the goals and
objectives of the curriculum.
X
CI.16. Current best practices in, including the use of
technology and other media, are considered in the
selection of learning materials and media.
X
CI.17. Decisions made regarding the curriculum are
based on data about student performance,
knowledge about organizational development,
and research about best practices in curriculum,
instruction, and assessment.
X
CI.18. The content and instructional activities in the
curriculum are consistent with the school’s
philosophy/mission.
X
CI.19. Administrative leadership and support are
provided in the coordination and articulation of
the curriculum.
X
CI.20. The curriculum is reviewed and evaluated
regularly and systematically. The curriculum
review/evaluation process includes safeguards to
ensure that the written curriculum is actually
taught. The review process focuses on what is to
N/A
This is
done at
diocesan
level.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 198
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
be deleted from the curriculum as well as what is
to be added.
Other:
Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
There were no stakeholder comments regarding the Indicators of Quality for Curriculum.
Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
CI8 Teachers, across grade levels, do not have regular curriculum meetings to articulate
and coordinate the knowledge and skills of the curriculum.
INDICATORS OF QUALITY FOR INSTRUCTION
Indicators for All Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
II.1. A variety of teaching strategies and techniques is
used to meet the needs of individual students in the
curriculum.
X
II.2. The scope and pacing of lessons in the curriculum
are appropriate for the students. X
II.3. Provision is made for appropriate amounts of
learning time for all aspects of the curriculum. X
II.4. Students are provided with additional assistance to
address specific learning challenges in the
curriculum when needed.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 199
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
II.5. Students and teachers demonstrate mutual respect
toward each other in classes. X
II.6. Students demonstrate an understanding of cultural
differences by maintaining respect for each other in
classes.
X
II.7. Class sizes promote and allow for varied
instructional strategies to be used. X
II.8. Meaningful and frequent communications with
parents are used to promote student learning in the
curriculum.
X
II.9. Members of the faculty are qualified, competent, and
dedicated to the objectives of the curriculum. X
II.10. Members of the faculty maintain safe, positive, and
supportive classroom environments. X
II.11.The faculty is provided with continuing
professional growth activities that support the
effective fulfillment of curriculum objectives.
Support for effective use of research-based
instructional practices is provided to teachers.
X
Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings.
A few parent stakeholders made the following comments regarding differentiation in the
classroom:
"Reading instruction is not being differentiated in the classroom to meet the needs of
students with varying abilities."
"There is lack of enrichment for young, gifted students."
"To accept responsibility for students learning, there must be evidence of differentiated
instruction for the varying levels of students especially in reading."
"I would like to see a small group of differentiated instruction especially in the area of
reading/language arts."
Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
II.4. Students are provided with additional assistance when they have specific learning
difficulties; however, the stakeholder comments regarding differentiation within the
classroom need to be addressed.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 200
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
INDICATORS OF QUALITY FOR ASSESSMENT
Indicators for All Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
AI.1. Assessment of student learning and performance is
aligned with curriculum and instruction in the
curriculum
X
AI.2. A variety of methods for assessing student learning
is used in the curriculum. X
AI.3. Assessment results in the curriculum are analyzed
with appropriate frequency and rigor for
individual students as they move through courses
in the curriculum.
X
o Assessment results in the curriculum are
analyzed with appropriate frequency and
rigor for cohorts of students as they move
through courses in the curriculum.
X
o Assessment results in the curriculum are
analyzed with appropriate frequency and
rigor for comparable (local, state, and
national) groups outside of the school.
X
AI.4. The assessment of student learning and
performance in the curriculum enables students to
monitor their own learning progress and teachers
to adapt their instruction to students’ specific
learning needs.
X
AI.5. Records of students’ learning and performance are
maintained in the curriculum. X
AI.6. Timely and useful evaluative information and
feedback regarding learning in the curriculum is
provided to students and parents (as appropriate).
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 201
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
AI.7. Assessment data on student learning are used to
measure the presence or absence of achievement in
the curriculum.
X
AI.8. Assessment data on student learning are used to
identify students needing additional support in the
curriculum.
X
AI.9. Placement/enrollment in courses in the curriculum
is based on a thorough analysis of students’
interests and potential as well as on students' past
performance.
N/A N/A N/A N/A
AI.10. Students in the curriculum are learning and
performing at levels expected, or progress is being
made to raise results accordingly.
X
Other:
Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
There were no stakeholder comments regarding the Indicators of Quality for
Assessment.
Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
I. ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS
Curriculum Design Issues
Content
Are the skills required for
improvement in student
performance included in the
X YES NO
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 202
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
current curriculum?
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Sequence
Are the skills required for
improvement in student
performance scheduled to be
taught before the administration
of the assessment?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Pacing
Are the skills required for
improvement in student
performance given sufficient time
in the current pacing of the
curriculum?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Format
Are the skills required for
improvement in student
performance taught in a format
consistent with the format in
which they will be tested?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Curriculum Delivery Issues Teacher Awareness of Content
Are teachers aware that the skills X YES NO
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 203
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
required for improvement in
student performance are included
in the current curriculum?
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Teacher Awareness of Sequencing
Are teachers aware that the skills
required for improvement in
student performance are
scheduled to be taught prior to
the administration of the
assessment?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Teacher Awareness of Pacing
Are teachers spending the
specified time on the skills
required for improvement in
student performance?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Teacher Awareness of Format
Are teachers aware of the
assessment objectives and the
format in which the skills required
for improvement in student
performance will be tested?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 204
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Teacher Resources
Do teachers have the resources
they will need to provide initial
instruction and supplementary or
remedial instruction and
formative assessment of the skills
required for improvement in
student performance?
YES X NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Teachers have the resources they need to provide the
necessary instruction. However, opportunities for
differentiation in the classroom have the potential to
increase as teachers share strategies, coordinate across
grade levels, and develop consistency with the use of
rubrics.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
A systematic plan needs to be developed to allow for
more differentiation in the classroom, to best meet the
needs of all students. A standard rubric format, which
can be adapted at each grade level, needs to be
developed and consistently implemented to meet the
specific needs of all students.
Teacher Skills
Do teachers have the professional
knowledge and skills to teach
students the skills required for
improvement in student
performance?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 205
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
C.1 Describe any improvements related to this component of the educational program
made within the past five years. A new Common Core aligned reading series was implemented in grades K-5 in the 2013-
2014 school year.
Listening and speaking components were implemented with the newly-aligned Common
Core standards.
Flip charts were purchased with Common Core Standards for ELA to assist teachers in
their planning, implementation, and instruction.
The Reading Olympics program was implemented for Grades 4-8.
SRA Reading Labs 2.0 Online was recently purchased and is being implemented in
Grades 3-5.
The Achieve 3000 (TeenBiz/KidBiz) program was purchased and implemented in grades
6-8. Prior to the 2013-2014 school year, Achieve 3000 (TeenBiz/KidBiz) was used in
grades 3-8.
C.2 List the significant strengths of the school in this component of the educational
program.
Reading Specialist certified teachers instruct ELA courses in the following grades: 1, 2, 5
and 7.
Newly-purchased Scott Foresman Reading Street program is aligned with the Common
Core Standards. It provides many resources to support differentiated instruction.
There has been an increase in the use of listening and speaking skills and activities as a
result of the Common Core standards.
Reading support services are available through the intermediate unit.
The librarian is a certified teacher of English.
C.3 List the significant areas for improvement of the school in this component of the
educational program.
The skills and knowledge of the curriculum need to be coordinated among teachers
across grade levels.
Teachers at all grade levels need to work more cooperatively and meet regularly to
discuss the use of ELA strategies in the classroom.
To meet the needs of students with varying abilities, an increase in differentiated
instruction needs to be considered and addressed in ELA classes.
An information media center to combine the school’s library and technology center
together is in the long range plan.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 206
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
C.4 Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any important next
steps or strategic priorities related to this component of the educational program that
should be included in the action plans in the Plan for Growth and Improvement.
Teachers at each grade level need to collaborate to compare strengths and weaknesses of
current rubrics so they can develop and implement an adaptable, school-wide rubric
format.
Teachers in grades K - 5 should collaborate so they can effectively use the tools provided
in the Common Core aligned Reading Street Series. The series includes Teacher
Forms/Classroom-based Assessment Tools (Literacy Behavior Checklists,
Assessment/Cumulative Record Forms, Portfolio Samples and Rubrics).
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 207
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
THE PLAN FOR GROWTH AND IMPROVEMENT
he culminating activity of the Excellence by Design self-study and planning
process is the development of a Plan for Growth and Improvement in student
performance and the school’s capacity to produce the levels of student
performance it desires and that are expected by its community of stakeholders.
The heart of the Plan for Growth and Improvement is composed of:
The three, four, or five areas of student performance and organizational capacity
the Planning Team has identified as most in need of growth and improvement,
The measurable objectives that have been developed to address those needs, and
The action plans the school will implement to achieve its objectives.
A. STUDENT PERFORMANCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL
CAPACITY OBJECTIVES
The centerpiece of the school's Plan for Growth and Improvement is formed by the
three, four, or five areas of measurable objectives the school has identified as being the
highest priorities for growth and improvement if the school is to move closer to
achieving its Mission. At least two of the objectives must focus on areas of student
performance that have been determined to be priorities for growth and improvement.
The remaining one, two, or three objectives may be either student performance
objectives and/or objectives focused on growing and improving the school's
organizational capacity to produce the levels of student performance desired and
expected by the school's community of stakeholders. Space is provided below to
evaluate the maximum number of objectives. This limited number of objectives is
suggested so the school can focus on the most critical aspects of student performance
without diverting its energies in too many directions.
To identify these priority areas, the Planning Team asked itself:
What are the gaps between what we say in our Profile of Graduates regarding
what we want our graduates to know, be able to do, and/or what qualities we
want them to demonstrate and our students’ actual performance in those areas?
Which of these gaps constitute the highest priorities for narrowing if we are to
move closer over the next seven years to achieving our mission?
Are there area of our organization's capacity the must be improved in order to
improve our students' performance to the levels we desire and expect
T
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 208
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Specifying clear and measurable student performance objectives identifies the school's
commitment to achieve specific end results and thus, is tied directly to accountability.
The objectives must be written in such a way that they outline growth in student
performance for the next seven years and represent a major focus for growth and
improvement in student performance in the school. The objectives should be consistent
with the mission and should extend and define the aim portion of the mission in more
specific detail. Objectives explicate in measurable terms the key end results that the
school seeks to realize from its mission, as expressed in its Profile of Graduates. Not
only should the objectives be related to the school's mission, but where there is also a
district or system plan, the objectives should be linked to one or more of the district’s or
system’s objectives.
The term “student performance” is intended to be defined in the broadest possible
terms. The objectives submitted for accreditation may be focused on any of the
outcomes expected of students as stated in the Profile of Graduates.
A.1. Student Performance Objective #1:
By 2021, SS. Simon and Jude School will demonstrate higher levels of achievement in math as
indicated on the Terra Nova Math Assessment. A 10% increase in the average percentile score
in math in grades 2 to 7 is the expectation.
A.2 Student Performance Objective #2:
By the year 2021, SS. Simon and Jude School will demonstrate higher levels of achievement in
writing. A 10% increase in the average percentile score on the Terra Nova Assessment in
reading and language arts in grades 2 – 7 is the expectation. In addition, an electronic writing
assessment will be purchased, a benchmark will be established, and a 5% increase will be
expected from the grade(s) using the program.
A.6 Organizational Capacity Objective #1:
By the year 2021, SS Simon and Jude School will increase the overall security, safety, and health
measures within the school community for the protection of the students, faculty, administration,
and visitors.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 209
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Baseline Data
Assessment of existing physical structures by stakeholders, safety experts, and local law
enforcement officers
Analysis of current crisis management plan
Evaluation of current health and wellness policy
Tools to Measure
Re-evaluation of the above items at regular intervals throughout the next seven years.
B. ACTION PLANS Student Performance Objective #1 Mathematics
I. First Year (2014-2015)
A. Establish and coordinate Math curriculum meetings.
1. Meet 3-6 times per school year to discuss progress and concerns.
2. Evaluate the use and purpose of student portfolios.
B. Attend professional development workshops on modeling and communication.
C. Group students in grades 3-7 based on potential and classroom observation for the
following school year.
D. Develop grade level rubrics for modeling and communication.
1. Create leveled rubrics for grades 1-2, 3-5, and 6-8.
II. Second Year (2015-2016)
A. Implement rubrics developed in year one.
1. Re-evaluate as necessary.
B. Continue with trimester math meetings.
C. Evaluate the math groupings in grades 3-7.
D. Continue to evaluate math sample textbooks for grade 7.
III. Third – Fourth Year (2016-2017 or 2017-2018)
A. Prepare a midpoint report for MSA documenting progress through the Action
Plan and adjusting timelines as indicated.
IV. Third – Seventh Year (2016-2017 through 2020-2021)
A. Analyze Terra Nova scores for measureable change in communication and
modeling.
B. Continue to evaluate the math groupings in grades 3-7.
C. Re-evaluate textbooks for meeting math standards.
D. Continue to attend math workshops.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 210
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Student Performance Objective #2 English Language Arts
I. First Year (2014-2015)
A. Establish and coordinate ELA curriculum meetings.
1. Meet 1-2 times per trimester to discuss progress and concerns.
2. Develop age and content appropriate rubrics to be used consistently within
the parameters of a school-wide template.
3. Discuss ways to structure writing periods in a more formal and effective
manner.
4. Evaluate the use and purpose of student portfolios.
B. Administer a teacher-generated writing assessment at the beginning of each
trimester to determine strengths and weakness and adapt instruction accordingly.
C. Attend professional development opportunities to enhance and improve the
teaching of writing.
D. Analyze Terra Nova scores in reading and language to evaluate
strengths/weaknesses and establish a baseline for measurable objectives.
E. Investigate electronic writing programs and assessments that meet needs and
goals.
II. Second Year (2015-2016)
A. Implement the revised rubrics developed in year one.
1. Consistently review rubrics with students so that expectations of success
are clear before the students begin a writing process.
2. Use rubrics and assessments to differentiate writing instruction more
effectively.
3. Re-evaluate rubrics as necessary.
B. Continue with trimester ELA curriculum meetings.
C. Purchase and implement new electronic writing programs and/or assessments to
establish a baseline of student performance.
D. Continue to analyze Terra Nova scores for measurable change in reading and
language specifically, but also across other curriculum areas.
E. Continue professional development in writing as needed.
F. Explore opportunities to showcase achievements in writing including a school
newspaper.
III. Third – Fourth Year (2016-2017 or 2017-2018)
A. Prepare a midpoint report for MSA documenting progress through the Action
Plan and adjusting timelines as indicated.
IV. Third – Seventh Year (2016-2017 through 2020-2021)
A. Continue to use and re-evaluate the efficacy of the school-wide rubric template.
B. Continue with trimester ELA curriculum meetings.
C. Continue to implement and review new electronic writing programs and/or
assessments purchased in year two.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 211
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
D. Continue to analyze Terra Nova scores for measurable change in reading and
language specifically, but also across other curriculum areas.
E. Continue professional development in writing as needed.
F. Evaluate textbooks for compliance with Common Core State standards.
G. Continue to explore opportunities to showcase achievements in writing: school
newspaper, writing contests, author visits, etc.
Organizational Capacity Objective # 1 Health and Safety
I. To increase security measures as recommended by the security committee
A. Make structural renovations to increase security as visitors enter the building by
relocating the school office.
1. By September 2014, the school office will be relocated by the main
entrance to better screen and control visitor access.
2. By September 2014, the front entry foyer will be reconstructed to
provide a safety zone where visitors will need further approval for
building entry.
3. By December 2014, administration will investigate the financial
feasibility of an anti-ballistic film to cover the main doors that would
deter the glass from breaking.
a. If financially feasible, this film will be placed on the main
doors by March, 2015.
b. By June 2015, this protective film will be placed on the
lower lobby doors and the entrance doors to Cavanaugh
Hall.
B. Investigate and decide on the use of the School Check-In System and/or the
Chester County Raptor System to screen visitors by January 2015.
1. By September 2014, the principal will visit other schools that have
these systems in place and evaluate the effectiveness of both systems.
2. Financial feasibility will determine if either of these check-in
screening systems will be implemented at SS Simon and Jude main
entrance. If so, implementation will occur by January 2015.
C. Install security cameras internally and externally
1. By January 2015, the security committee will work with the business
manager to see if additional security cameras are financially feasible.
2. If financially feasible, by September 2015 several security cameras
will be placed around the campus based on recommendations by
security experts.
D. Update communication system within the school
1. By September 2014, a phone system will be installed to permit an all-
call announcement from any classroom in the event of an emergency.
2. By September 2014, School Reach phone system, an off-site
emergency contact system, will be in place to notify all stakeholders of
any emergencies.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 212
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
3. Re-evaluate yearly the effectiveness of the communication system and
make updates as needed based on faculty observations and
experiences.
4. By September 2015, install an extension to the school phone system in
the physical education office, if feasible.
5. By September 2015, install extensions to the school phone system in
all rooms where students and faculty may be present, if feasible.
E. Update Crisis Management Plan to increase crisis preparedness
1. By September 2014, the security committee will formulate an updated
and easy to use crisis management plan.
2. By September 2014, this crisis plan will be reviewed by all staff
members. All input will be carefully considered and implemented.
3. By November 2014, this plan will be published and placed in each
classroom.
4. By January 2015, all substitute teachers will be asked to become
familiar with the crisis plan.
5. On a monthly basis, the principal will lead Emergency Management
Drills during school hours as designated in the crisis management
plan.
6. On a yearly basis, the security committee and the faculty will re-
evaluate the crisis management plan based on recommendations of
first responders, county security experts, and current safe-school best
practices.
F. Establish a Parent/Child Reunification Plan
1. By June 2015, the security committee will investigate several sites to
serve as reunification locations in the event of an off-site evacuation.
2. By September 2015, the security committee will establish a written
Parent/Child Reunification Plan based on the recommendations set forth
in the 2013-2014 Safe School Plan.
3. By September 2015, a reunification site will be chosen. This site will
be communicated to all parents/guardians.
II. Update Standard Operating Procedures for Safety
A. Re-establish a Medical Emergency Response Team (MERT)
1. By December 2014, establish a MERT which includes current
personnel specially trained by the Safety Compliance Company. They
will safely operate the AED (Automated External Defibrillator) and
will be equipped to handle medical emergencies until the proper
authorities arrive on site.
B. Train staff in AED use
1. By June 2015, staff members will be trained by qualified instructors on
the proper use of AEDs.
2. Staff will be retrained yearly on the proper use of AED.
C. Train staff in basic first-aid procedures
1. By January 2016, all staff members will receive basic first-aid training
by a certified professional.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 213
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
2. By January 2016, CPR training will be provided to key personnel by a
certified CPR instructor.
3. Re-evaluate yearly the certification process, especially when there is a
change in personnel.
4. On a yearly basis, in September all first aid supplies will be
replenished by the nurse and distributed to each classroom.
D. Request the installation of a “School Zone” sign with flashing lights on West
Chester Pike to reduce speed during arrival and dismissal times
1. By June 2016, contact Westtown East Goshen Municipal Department
to initiate a feasibility study to install a School Zone sign with flashing
lights.
2. Installation of the sign will be based on the results of the study.
E. Request the installation of a “Drug Free School Zone” sign to deter the use or sale
of illegal drugs
1. By September 2016, ask the DARE officer to investigate the
installation of the “Drug Free School Zone” sign.
2. Installation of the sign will be based on the results of the study.
III. Update Health and Wellness Policy
A. Establish a committee to update the current Health and Wellness Policy
1. By January 2015, the principal will request the assistance of parish
community members who are trained in the fields of health and
wellness such as nutritionists and/or dieticians, doctors and/or nurses,
hot lunch coordinators, administration, and teachers.
2. By June 2015, committee members will compose a clearly-defined
Health and Wellness Policy.
3. By September 2015, this policy will be evaluated by the faculty and
staff.
4. By December 2015, this policy will be published and posted on-line
with notification of the on-line publication, stated in the student-parent
handbook, and shared with all stakeholders.
5. In September 2016, and on-going, homeroom teachers will remind
parents to review this on-line policy during Back to School Night and
during the initial Home and School Meeting.
6. Yearly re-evaluation of the policy’s effectiveness will be based on
faculty observations and parent feedback.