exemplu de analiza de impact

Upload: studentul1986

Post on 01-Jun-2018

284 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 Exemplu de Analiza de Impact

    1/31

  • 8/9/2019 Exemplu de Analiza de Impact

    2/31

    2

    % Centre for E"ono$i"& and B'&ine&& (e&ear"h Ltd, 2012

    "isclaimer

    )hi*&t e+er effort ha& #een $ade to en&'re the a""'ra" of the $ateria* in thi& do"'$ent, neither Centre forE"ono$i"& and B'&ine&& (e&ear"h Ltd nor the re-ort.& a'thor& i** #e *ia#*e for an *o&& or da$a/e& in"'rredthro'/h the '&e of the re-ort!

    Authorship and ac#no!led ements

    hi& re-ort ha& #een -rod'"ed # Ce#r, an inde-endent e"ono$i"& and #'&ine&& re&ear"h "on&'*tan"e&ta#*i&hed in 1992! he &t'd a& *ed # Shehan oha$ed, Ce#r Senior E"ono$i&t ith dire"tion -ro+ided# *i+er o/an, Ce#r ead of i"roe"ono$i"&!

    hi& &t'd ha& #een "o$$i&&ioned # he oot#a** o'ndation the United 6in/do$.& *ar/e&t &-ort&. "harit ,hi"h i& f'nded # the re$ier Lea/'e, he oot#a** &&o"iation and the De-art$ent for C'*t're edia andS-ort, +ia S-ort En/*and!

    London, "to#er 2013

  • 8/9/2019 Exemplu de Analiza de Impact

    3/31

    3

    % Centre for E"ono$i"& and B'&ine&& (e&ear"h Ltd, 2012

    Contents

    Content& !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 3

    E e"'ti+e S'$$ar !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 4

    1 ntrod'"tion and #a";/ro'nd !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 7

    1!1 )hat are /ra&& root& &-ort& fa"i*itie&< !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 7 1!2 E"ono$i" "ondition& in the "on&tr'"tion ind'&tr !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 8

    2 ethodo*o/ and a&&'$-tion& !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 10

    2!1 Ca-t'rin/ in+e&t$ent in the /ra&& root& fa"i*itie& ind'&tr !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 10 2!2 E$#eddin/ /ra&& root& fa"i*itie& in+e&t$ent& ithin an e"ono$i" i$-a"t& fra$e or; !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 14 2!3 n-'t=o't-'t $ode**in/ and a*ternati+e $'*ti-*ier "on"e-t& !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 24

    3 >ra&& root &-ort& fa"i*itie&: &i?e, e"ono$i" "ontri#'tion and i$-a"t& !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 2@

    3!1 Contri#'tion of /ra&& root& &-ort& fa"i*itie& to e"ono$i" o't-'t !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 2@ 3!2 Contri#'tion of /ra&& root& &-ort& fa"i*itie& to e$-*o $ent !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 27

    4 Con"*'&ion& !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 29

    --endi : Sa$-*e of a"t'a* -roAe"t data !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 31

  • 8/9/2019 Exemplu de Analiza de Impact

    4/31

  • 8/9/2019 Exemplu de Analiza de Impact

    5/31

    5

    % Centre for E"ono$i"& and B'&ine&& (e&ear"h Ltd, 2012

    or e+er 100 +o*'nteer& re"r'ited, 25 &taff are a#*e to #e e$-*o ed on either a -art=ti$e orf'**=ti$e #a&i& for a ran/e of a"ti+itie& e!/! &ite $ana/e$ent, "oa"hin/, foot#a** de+e*o-$ent,"*eanin/, #ar a"ti+itie& 4! 'rther$ore, it i& anti"i-ated that an additiona* 3,200 +o*'nteer& -erear i** /ain ne 'a*ifi"ation& a& a re&'*t of in+e&t$ent& $ade in 2011!

    he&e three "on"*'&ion& are the fina* -rod'"t& of an ad+an"ed $ode**in/ -ro/ra$$e hi"h dra &on e"ono$i" and finan"ia* data fro$ "on&tr'"tion -roAe"t& that are f'nded # he oot#a**o'ndation!

    Ever& pound spent on rass roots facilities enerates )*.+, for the UK econom&

    Ba&ed on the -rofi*e of e"ono$i" a"ti+itie& "o$$i&&ioned d'rin/ the "on&tr'"tion and o-eration-ha&e& of /ra&& root& &-ort& fa"i*itie&, Ce#r ha+e e&ti$ated an 't-'t $'*ti-*ier of 2!53 for theG>ra&& root& &-ort& fa"i*itie&. ind'&tr5! hi& "an #e inter-reted in &i$-*e ter$& a& fo**o &: for e+er1 of o't-'t /enerated dire"t* # "ontra"tor& re 'ired for /ra&& root& fa"i*it in+e&t$ent& ando-eration&, an additiona* 1!53 of e"ono$i" o't-'t i& /enerated in the ider e"ono$ thro'/hindirect de$and &ti$'*'& thro'/h &'--* "hain and induced in"rea&ed in"o$e& hi"h ind'"e&"on&'$er &-endin/ i$-a"t&! n "o$-ari&on to other a"ti+itie&, in+e&t$ent in /ra&& root& &-ort&fa"i*itie& a--ear& to /enerate hi/her $'*ti-*ier effe"t& = e ha+e identified an 't-'t $'*ti-*ier of2!22 for the G rt&, entertain$ent and re"reation. &e"tor!

    Ever& pound a!arded b& the Foundation on rass roots facilities enerates an additional )-.-, forthe UK econom&

    he o'ndation t -i"a** "ontri#'te& aro'nd 33- in e+er 1 in+e&ted in "on&tr'"tion -roAe"t& iththe re$ainder /enerated thro'/h -artner&hi- f'ndin/! n other ord&, e+er 33- in+e&ted # heo'ndation /enerate& a tota* 't-'t $'*ti-*ier i$-a"t of 2!53! hi& $ean& that the 15$"ontri#'ted # he o'ndation to ard& "on&tr'"tion -roAe"t& &tarted in 2011 /enerated a tota* of11@$ in e"ono$i" o't-'t! hi& i$-*ie& that he o'ndation.& f'ndin/ 'n*o";& 7!73 for e+er 1/ranted for the t -i"a* -roAe"t!

    Re eneration impacts and better health outcomes o be&ond the initial direct and multiplierimpacts

    n addition to the in"rea&e in ho'&eho*d in"o$e& and e$-*o $ent &'--orted # he o'ndation.&there are other e"ono$i" #enefit& to "on&ider! $-ro+in/ '-on and #'i*din/ ne *o"a* fa"i*itie& -*a &a -art in in"rea&in/ the attra"ti+ene&& of an area to *i+e in! a";a/ed ith the ri/ht &et of additiona*$ea&'re&, e!/!, #etter tran&-ort, ho'&in/, a""e&& to &er+i"e&, there i& an o--ort'nit to attra"t neor;er& and e$-*o er& into 'nder=e$-*o ed area&! he Gre/eneration i$-a"t&. of &'"h "on&tr'"tion

    -roAe"t& $'&t therefore #e a";no *ed/ed a& the a""o'nt for a *ar/e -art of the -er$anent effe"t#e ond the initia* "on&tr'"tion -ha&e!

    4 This is based on the a%era#e paid staff to %olunteer ratio usin# data from the 2011 ootball oundation Annual &onitorin#' (%aluation )&'(* +ur%ey

    , This calculation is based on the -eontief .nput$Output Approach uses 200" +upply and /se tables published by the Officefor ational +tatistics

  • 8/9/2019 Exemplu de Analiza de Impact

    6/31

  • 8/9/2019 Exemplu de Analiza de Impact

    7/31

    7

    % Centre for E"ono$i"& and B'&ine&& (e&ear"h Ltd, 2012

    /ntroduction and bac# round

    hi& i& a re-ort # Centre for E"ono$i"& and B'&ine&& (e&ear"h Ce#r on the $a"roe"ono$i"#enefit& of in+e&t$ent in /ra&& root& fa"i*itie&! he a&&e&&$ent i& #a&ed on e"ono$i" data "o**e"tedd'rin/ the "on&tr'"tion and o-erationa* -ha&e& of &-ort& fa"i*itie&! he re-ort a& "o$$i&&ioned #he oot#a** o'ndation!

    . 0hat are rass roots sports facilities1

    >ra&& root& &-ort& fa"i*itie& are #'i*t for the -ro+i&ion of &-ortin/ a"ti+it for a$ate'r -arti"i-ant&! &&'"h the ha+e a &tron/ "o$$'nit fo"'& a& the -ro+ide o--ort'nitie& for the /enera* -'#*i" in the*o"a* area to -arti"i-ate in &-ort! he oot#a** o'ndation = the U6.& *ar/e&t &-ort&. "harit = ha&in+e&ted 343 $i**ion dire"t* into /ra&& root& fa"i*itie& thro'/h the a**o"ation of /rant a ard& &in"e2000! hi& ha& re&'*ted in o+er 1,700 ne * #'i*t or i$-ro+ed fa"i*itie&, hi"h ha+e #een /ro'-edithin the fo**o in/ fo'r -roAe"t& t -e&:

    AG's 2Artificial Grass 'itches3 = > & are #'i*t '&in/ & ntheti" fi#re&, hi"h are de&i/ned to*oo; and -erfor$ *i;e nat'ra* /ra&&! hird /eneration > & '&e a r'##er "r'$# infi** in&teadof a &and=#a&ed $ethod -re+io'&* '&ed! > & are a#*e to offer a &i/nifi"ant n'$#er ofho'r& of &-ortin/ a"ti+it -er ee;, e&-e"ia** hen #'i*t in "onA'n"tion ith f*ood*i/htin/!hi& -ro+ide& a hi/h 'a*it -*a in/ &'rfa"e thro'/ho't the ear, and a**o & for hi/h *e+e*& of-arti"i-ation to o""'r!

    Chan in rooms 4 rass pitches = He * #'i*t or ref'r#i&hed "han/in/ roo$& -ro+ide a &afe,&e"'re and -ra"ti"a* $ean& to "han/e #efore and after &-ortin/ a"ti+it ! o'ndation f'ndedfa"i*itie& $'&t "o$-* f'** ith the B'i*din/ (e/'*ation& and the E 'a*it "t! ften"han/in/ roo$& for$ the f'n"tiona* &e"tion of a *ar/er "han/in/ -a+i*ion, hi"h a*&o in"*'de&an o-erationa* area that /enera** "on&i&t& of a $ain entran"e *o## , toi*et&, &o"ia* &-a"e and;it"hen!

    6e to the de+e*o-$ent of /ra&& root& foot#a** i& the de&i/n and "on&tr'"tion of /ood 'a*it/ra&& -it"he&! he o'ndation &'--ort& thi& thro'/h the a ard of /rant& to -it"h or;&-roAe"t&, hi"h either re&'*t& in ne * #'i*t -it"he& or the i$-ro+e$ent of e i&tin/ /ra&&-it"he&, /enera** thro'/h draina/e or;&!

    5ulti6facilit& pro7ects = roAe"t& f'nded # the o'ndation hi"h in"*'de > &, "han/in/roo$& andIor /ra&& -it"he& are "*a&&ified a& $'*ti=fa"i*it -roAe"t& d'e to the "o$#ination ofdifferent t -e& of /ra&& root& fa"i*itie& at the &a$e &ite!

    %mall scale pro7ects = ** o'ndation f'nded /ra&& root& fa"i*it -roAe"t& hi"h are 'nder100; in tota* -roAe"t "o&t are "*a&&ified a& &$a** &"a*e -roAe"t& ithin thi& re-ort! he$aAorit of the&e -roAe"t& are ref'r#i&hed "han/in/ roo$&, &$a** /ra&& -it"h or;& or$aintenan"e e 'i-$entIfen"in/!

    n the ne t &e"tion, e -ro+ide ana* &i& and "o$$entar of "'rrent e"ono$i" "ondition& in the"on&tr'"tion &e"tor!

  • 8/9/2019 Exemplu de Analiza de Impact

    8/31

    8

    % Centre for E"ono$i"& and B'&ine&& (e&ear"h Ltd, 2012

    .* Economic conditions in the construction industr&

    'r#'*ent e"ono$i" and finan"ia* "ondition& in the U6 e"ono$ ha+e di&r'-ted "on&tr'"tion o't-'tin re"ent ear&! he tota* +o*'$e of "on&tr'"tion o't-'t in the fir&t ha*f of 2012 a& aro'nd 14F*o er than o+er the &a$e -eriod in 2007 10! Both "o$$er"ia* and ho'&in/ "on&tr'"tion -roAe"t& ha+e

    &'ffered fro$ hi/her finan"in/ "o&t&, in"rea&ed $ateria* "o&t&11

    and *o er effe"ti+e de$and!

    n En/*and, the n'$#er of ho'&in/ &tart& in the t e*+e $onth& to ar"h 2012 a& do n # @F"o$-ared to the &a$e -eriod a ear ear*ier 12! hi& i& $o&t* e -*ained # a &i/nifi"ant de"rea&e inho'&e #'i*din/ -ro+ided # *o"a* a'thoritie& after t o ear&. of re"ord &tart& #et een 2010 and2012! o'&in/ &tart& toda are &ti** aro'nd 40F #e*o *e+e*& &een in 2007 hi"h i& d'e to an a#&en"eof -ri+ate &e"tor a"ti+it &in"e the end of the "redit "r'n"h!

    he "o$$er"ia* &e"tor ha& &een a $ore -rono'n"ed de"*ine in a"ti+it &in"e 2007 "o$-ared to theho'&in/ &e"tor! ota* "o$$er"ia* "on&tr'"tion a"ti+it a& 28F *o er in +o*'$e ter$& in the fir&tha*f of 2012 "o$-ared to the &a$e -eriod in 2007! )e e -e"t "o$$er"ia* "on&tr'"tion a"ti+it to #ee tre$e* ea; o+er the ne t t o ear&, a& -ri+ate &e"tor in+e&t$ent i& -ara* &ed # *a"; of#'&ine&& "onfiden"e, ea;er "on&'$er de$and and hi/her finan"in/ "o&t&! Co$-ared to 2007, the+a*'e of "on&tr'"tion o't-'t of offi"e& ha& fa**en # 50F hi*&t o't-'t of &ho-& =35F , &"hoo*& =37F , ho&-ita*& =44F and entertain$ent J re"reation =@F ha+e a*&o de"rea&ed &i/nifi"ant* !

    he "on&tr'"tion &e"tor ha& et to re"o+er &in"e the end of the "redit "r'n"h! ndeed, the on=/oin/E'ro?one &o+erei/n de#t "ri&i& ha& &t'nted in+e&t$ent into the &e"tor and -'&hed '- finan"in/"o&t&!Lac# of construction activit& has been the lar est dra on total G"' ro!th in recent8uarters , de"rea&in/ 'arter=on= 'arter U6 >D /ro th # 0!4F and 0!3F -er"enta/e -oint& in K12012 and K2 2012 re&-e"ti+e* !

    he i$-*i"ation& of a ea; "on&tr'"tion a"ti+it ha+e ;no";=on effe"t& for e$-*o $ent in the &e"tor!i/'re 1 i**'&trate& tota* +o*'$e of "on&tr'"tion o't-'t and the a+era/e n'$#er of ee;* ho'red # a t -i"a* "on&tr'"tion or;er!

    10 Output in the 9onstruction .ndustry8 Office for ational +tatistics )=uly 2012*11 &onthly +tatistics of ;uildin# &aterials and 9omponents8 >epartment for ;usiness8 .nno%ation and +kill )Au#ust 2012*12 >epartment for 9ommunities and -ocal ?o%ernment )Au#ust 2012*

  • 8/9/2019 Exemplu de Analiza de Impact

    9/31

    9

    % Centre for E"ono$i"& and B'&ine&& (e&ear"h Ltd, 2012

    Figure 1: Volume of construction output (LHS)and actual weekly hours worked in construction (RHS)

    Source: Office for National Statistics, Cebr analysis

    fter a #rief re"o+er in 2010I11, +o*'$e& of "on&tr'"tion o't-'t are no a*$o&t #a"; at *e+e*& *a&t&een in 2009! oda , the "on&tr'"tion -i-e*ine i& di$ini&hin/ ith +o*'$e& of ne "on&tr'"tion or;fa**in/ # 12F ear=on= ear in K2 2012! hi& red'"e& de$and for "on&tr'"tion e$-*o $ent andee;* ho'r& or;ed! ota* n'$#er& e$-*o ed in "on&tr'"tion a"ro&& the U6 fe** to 2,1@5,000 in K22012 fro$ 2,188,000 in K2 2011 re-re&entin/ 24,000 net Ao# *o&&e& o+er thi& -eriod! he n'$#erof a"t'a* ee;* ho'r& or;ed in "on&tr'"tion i& re*ati+e* 'n"han/ed fro$ a ear a/o, a*tho'/h thea+era/e "on&tr'"tion or;er.& or;in/ ee; i& three ho'r& &horter toda than "o$-ared to the-ea; -eriod in K4 2007!

    Loo;in/ ahead, e e -e"t "ondition& to #e "ha**en/in/ in the &e"tor a& #oth -ri+ate and -'#*i" &e"torin+e&t$ent& into the ind'&tr are "on&trained # *o *e+e*& of #'&ine&& "onfiden"e and /o+ern$ent&-endin/ "'t& re&-e"ti+e* !

    !"#

    !"$

    !"%

    !"&

    %"'

    %"#

    %"$

    %"%

    %"&

    "'

    "#

    "$

    &'

    &!

    '

    !

    1''

    1'!

    11'

    * #'' * #''$ * #''! * #''% * #'' * #''& * #'' * #'1' * #'11

    Volume of construction output (LHS) +,erage actual weekly hours per worker (RHS)

  • 8/9/2019 Exemplu de Analiza de Impact

    10/31

  • 8/9/2019 Exemplu de Analiza de Impact

    11/31

    11

    % Centre for E"ono$i"& and B'&ine&& (e&ear"h Ltd, 2012

    n order to 'antif the tota* e"ono$i" i$-a"t of in+e&t$ent in /ra&& root& &-ort& fa"i*itie&, e ha+efir&t had to identif the dire"t i$-a"t& of "a-ita* &-endin/ on "on&tr'"tion -roAe"t&! n order toa"hie+e thi&, e ha+e dra n on finan"ia* infor$ation fro$ 47 o't of the 80 -roAe"t& that heo'ndation and -artner& ha+e in+e&ted in hi"h &tarted "on&tr'"tion d'rin/ 2011! hi& finan"ia*infor$ation in"*'de& data on the +ario'& e"ono$i" a"ti+itie& 'nderta;en # "ontra"tor& and

    "o$$i&&ioned fro$ &'#"ontra"tor& in order to #'i*d fa"i*itie&! he nat're of the&e e"ono$i"a"ti+itie& ha+e #een "ate/ori&ed in order to "a*"'*ate indire"t, ind'"ed and therefore tota* e"ono$i"i$-a"t& fro$ "on&tr'"tion of fa"i*itie&! n addition, e ha+e dra n on ann'a* onitorin/ JE+a*'ation JE &'r+e data fro$ he o'ndation in order to "a*"'*ate the o-erationa* i$-a"t& ofthe #'i*t fa"i*itie&!

    n the re$ainder of thi& "ha-ter, e e -*ain o'r $ethodo*o/ and a&&'$-tion& '&ed to "a*"'*atedire"t, indire"t, ind'"ed and tota* e"ono$i" i$-a"t& of the "on&tr'"tion and o-eration of /ra&& root&&-ort& fa"i*itie&!

    Investment analysishe oot#a** o'ndation.& in+e&t$ent a"ti+itie& en"o$-a&& aro'nd &i teen different e"ono$i"a"ti+itie& re*ated to "on&tr'"tion and -rofe&&iona* &er+i"e&! n 2011, a tota* of 45!9$ of "a-ita*&-endin/ a& a**o"ated to "on&tr'"tion -roAe"t& a#*e 1 i**'&trate& the ran/e of e"ono$i" a"ti+itie&hi"h #enefited fro$ thi& dire"t in+e&t$ent! 'r &t'd dra & on a tota* of 80 "on&tr'"tion -roAe"t&&tarted in 2011 a& a #a&i& for "a*"'*atin/ the dire"t, indire"t and ind'"ed i$-a"t& of he o'ndation.&a"ti+itie&!

    0a.le 1: ndustries stimulated in the different stages of de,elopment of grass roots sports facilities

    2e,elopment Stage ndustry sectors to which capital e3penditure flows

    2e,elopment and -onsentAccountin# and ta@ consultancyArchitectural and technical consultancy-e#al ser%ices

    4eneral -onstruction

    >raina#e(lectrical and mechanical installations(@ternal worksencin#loor and wall co%erin#=oinery installation-andscapin#aintin#8 lumbin# and oofin#

    +ite reparation

    Specialist -onstruction

    A? s )carpet and sub$base*loodli#htin#?rass pitch workserformance testin#

    Source: The Football Foundation, Cebr analysis

    he in"rea&e in "a-ita* e -endit're& a& a re&'*t of he o'ndation.& in+e&t$ent a"ti+itie& dire"t*&ti$'*ate& de$and for the e"ono$i" a"ti+itie& o't*ined a#o+e! he #'*; of he o'ndation.&in+e&t$ent a"ti+itie& are in the "on&tr'"tion ind'&tr !

  • 8/9/2019 Exemplu de Analiza de Impact

    12/31

  • 8/9/2019 Exemplu de Analiza de Impact

    13/31

    13

    % Centre for E"ono$i"& and B'&ine&& (e&ear"h Ltd, 2012

    0a.le $: -apital e3penditures associated with grass roots sports facilities started in #'117 .y in,estment si;e

    n,estment si;e perpro ect

    9um.er ofin,estments

    /nder C20k 7

    C20k $ C,0k "

    C,0k $ C100k 7

    O%er C100k ,7

    Total :0

    Source: The Football Foundation, Cebr analysis

    +er 70F of "on&tr'"tion -roAe"t& &tarted in 2011 ere orth $ore than 100; in in+e&t$ent &i?e!n ter$& of the re/iona* *o"ation of tota* ann'a* "a-ita* &-endin/, the So'th Ea&t re/ion re"ei+ed the*ar/e&t a$o'nt of in+e&t$ent 8!4$ !

    0a.le !: -apital e3penditures associated with grass roots sports facilities started in #'117 .y region

    n,estment 0otal in,estment0otal regionalconstructionemployment

    8 spent perregional

    construction o.orth (ast 38 ,4 ",8 00 3:!2

    (ast &idlands 48:02 14:8300 32!4

    (ast 8::7 22:8300 30!2

  • 8/9/2019 Exemplu de Analiza de Impact

    14/31

    14

    % Centre for E"ono$i"& and B'&ine&& (e&ear"h Ltd, 2012

    0a.le %: -apital e3penditures associated with grass roots sports facilities started in #'117 .y organisation

    5rganisation 9um.er ofin,estments

    0otalin,estment7

    8'''s

    +,erage grant .yFF per pro ect

    ootball club 2, 8"07 12

    -ocal authority 31 2,81,: 2,+chool 1, 1182 2 24,

    Other " 28 22 2"

    Total :0 4,8",0 1::

    Source: The Football Foundation, Cebr analysis

    Lo"a* a'thoritie& re"ei+ed the *ar/e&t a$o'nt of in+e&t$ent for "on&tr'"tion -roAe"t& 25!2$ in2011! Lo"a* a'thoritie& a*&o re"ei+ed the *ar/e&t a+era/e /rant fro$ he o'ndation 25@,000 ,fo**o ed # &"hoo*& 245,000 and then foot#a** "*'#& 12@,000 !

    *.* Embeddin rass roots facilities investments !ithin an economicimpacts frame!or#

    hi& &'#&e"tion de&"ri#e& the $anner in hi"h e e$#edded the /ra&& root& &-ort& fa"i*itie&in+e&t$ent Gind'&tr . ithin the e"ono$i" fra$e or; 'nder* in/ Ce#r.& $a"roe"ono$i" i$-a"t$ode*&!

    Demand stimulus created by investment

    n+e&t$ent in /ra&& root& &-ort& fa"i*itie& "reate& a fina* de$and &ti$'*'& for the -rod'"t& and&er+i"e& re 'ired to rea*i&e that in+e&t$ent! )e ha+e "ate/ori&ed "a-ita* e -endit're& t -i"a**$ade d'rin/ the "on&tr'"tion -ha&e #a&ed on finan"ia* infor$ation -ro+ided # he o'ndationfro$ a tota* of 47 o't of the 80 -roAe"t& f'nded and &tarted in 2011! tota* of 11 -roAe"t& ere '&eda& a #a&i& to -ro+ide the a"t'a* "o&t& in"'rred # "ontra"tor& d'rin/ the "on&tr'"tion -ha&e, hi*&tthe re$ainin/ -roAe"t& &'--*ied the -roAe"ted "o&t& &'#$itted # "ontra"tor& at the /ranta--*i"ation &ta/e! he $ethodo*o/ '&ed to "a*"'*ate the t -i"a* "a-ita* &-endin/ -rofi*e for di&tin"tin+e&t$ent t -e& a& a& fo**o &:=

    1! Obtained sample of 47 actual and pro ected cost brea!do"ns for construction pro ects funded by The Foundation and started in #$%% ! hi& in"*'ded infor$ation on the indi+id'a*

    "ontra"tor& and &'#="ontra"tor& '&ed and -ro-ortion& of their *a#o'r hi"h ere *o"a**&o'r"ed 13!

    13 -ocally sourced labour was defined as employees recruited in the same or adjoinin# local authority as the location of thefunded site!

  • 8/9/2019 Exemplu de Analiza de Impact

    15/31

    15

    % Centre for E"ono$i"& and B'&ine&& (e&ear"h Ltd, 2012

    #& Assi'ned Standard (ndustry Classifications )S(C* codes to cost cate'ories& Ea"h di&"retee"ono$i" a"ti+it identified d'rin/ the "on&tr'"tion -ha&e a& a&&i/ned an ind'&tr "ode#a&ed on U6 Standard nd'&tr C*a&&ifi"ation& U6 S C 2007 de+e*o-ed # the ffi"e forHationa* Stati&ti"&! hi& e er"i&e "a-t're& the nat're of the a"ti+itie& "o$$i&&ioned andinfor$& "a*"'*ation of $'*ti-*ier i$-a"t& #a&ed on &'--* "hain "hara"teri&ti"& of ea"h&'#"ontra"tor!

    +& Applied capital spendin' profiles to total e penditure on -$ construction pro ects funded andstarted in #$%%& Uni 'e "a-ita* &-endin/ -rofi*e& of e"ono$i" a"ti+itie& ere "reatedre&-e"ti+e* for > &, "han/in/ roo$& J /ra&& -it"he&, $'*ti=fa"i*it -roAe"t& and &$a** &"a*eJ other -roAe"t&! he&e "a-ita* &-endin/ -rofi*e& ere a--*ied to the tota* a$o'nt of f'nd&&-ent on ea"h di&tin"t in+e&t$ent t -e to /i+e tota* de$and &ti$'*'& on ea"h e"ono$i"a"ti+it a& a re&'*t of he o'ndation.& f'ndin/!

    a#*e 7 i**'&trate& the -rofi*e of e"ono$i" a"ti+itie& that #enefit fro$ in"rea&ed de$and &ti$'*'& a&a re&'*t of dire"t in+e&t$ent /enerated # he o'ndation.& f'ndin/ a"ti+itie& 14!

    0a.le : 2emand stimulus from increased capital e3penditures associated with grass roots sports facilities startedin #'117 .y organisation

    S - -ode

  • 8/9/2019 Exemplu de Analiza de Impact

    16/31

    16

    % Centre for E"ono$i"& and B'&ine&& (e&ear"h Ltd, 2012

    )e ha+e identified 28 di&"rete e"ono$i" a"ti+itie& hi"h #enefit fro$ in"rea&ed de$and &ti$'*'&!Ea"h of the&e e"ono$i" a"ti+itie& ha& #een attri#'ted a 3=di/it Standard nd'&tr C*a&&ifi"ation S C"ode for the -'r-o&e& of "a*"'*atin/ the indire"t and ind'"ed $'*ti-*ier i$-a"t& d'rin/ the $ode**in/-ro"e&&!

    n the ne t &e"tion&, e de&"ri#e the e"ono$i" a"ti+itie& &ti$'*ated a& a re&'*t of in+e&t$ent in t oof the o'ndation.& $ain in+e&t$ent& rtifi"ia* >ra&& it"he& > & and Chan/in/ (oo$& J >ra&&it"he&!

    Demand stimulus created by investment - Artificial Grass Pitches

    n 2011, a tota* of 5!2$ a& in+e&ted in rtifi"ia* >ra&& it"h > "on&tr'"tion -roAe"t& in 2011!i/'re 3 i**'&trate& the di&tri#'tion of e"ono$i" a"ti+itie& hi"h #enefit d'rin/ "on&tr'"tion!

    Figure : -apital e3penditures associated with +4 &'#=#a&e and in&ta**ation of the "ar-et! n additiona* 'arter 27F of "o&t& arein"'rred on f*ood*i/htin/, -re-aration and fen"in/ of the &ite!

    Demand stimulus created by investment - Changing Rooms and Grass Pitches

    n 2011, a tota* of 20!1$ a& in+e&ted in Chan/in/ (oo$& and >ra&& it"h "on&tr'"tion -roAe"t& in

    2011! i/'re 4 i**'&trate& the di&tri#'tion of e"ono$i" a"ti+itie& hi"h #enefit d'rin/ "on&tr'"tion!

    AG' %ub6base*- -roAe"t! ro'nd ha*f 48F of tota* "a-ita* &-endin/ i& on -*'$#in/, draina/e,e terna* or;&, roofin/, Aoiner and e*e"tri"a* J $e"hani"a* in&ta**ation! n additiona* 'arter 27Fi& &-ent on &ite -re-aration and /enera* "on&tr'"tion a"ti+itie&!

    n the ne t &e"tion, e 'antif the dire"t e$-*o $ent i$-a"t& of he o'ndation.& in+e&t$enta"ti+itie& d'rin/ #oth the "on&tr'"tion -ha&e and the da =to=da o-eration of the fa"i*itie& on"e theare "o$-*eted! *ea&e note that Cha-ter 3 'antifie& the indire"t and ind'"ed $'*ti-*ier effe"t& ofhe o'ndation.& in+e&t$ent& in addition to the dire"t i$-a"t& o't*ined in the ne t &e"tion!

    General construction-mployment impact

    0otal 2irect F0> Ao.s 0otal 2irect local F0> o.s

    Ao.screated per

    86

    0otal createdin #'11

    B Localemployment

    0otalcreated in

    #'11

    Artificial ?rass itch)A? s* 7!, 3" 33F 139han#in# ooms and

    ?rass itches 7!, 1,, "7F 1,0

    &ulti$facility 7!, 144 , F :1

    +mall scale and Other 7!, 7 100F 7

    Total 7!, 344 73F 2,1

  • 8/9/2019 Exemplu de Analiza de Impact

    22/31

    22

    % Centre for E"ono$i"& and B'&ine&& (e&ear"h Ltd, 2012

    0a.le 11: +,erage num.er of ,olunteers for a facility7 .y in,estment type

    Source: The Football Foundation, Cebr analysis

    (e"r'itin/ +o*'nteer& ena#*e& the *o ="o&t r'nnin/ of fa"i*itie& and dri+e& the in"o$e=/eneratin/

    o-eration& that are 'nderta;en on a dai* #a&i&! hi& a**o & $ore f'nd& to #e &-ent on o-erationa*e -endit're& hi"h are re 'ired for the da =to=da r'nnin/ of the fa"i*it ! heir ro*e therefore$a;e& the o-eration of /ra&& root& &-ort& fa"i*itie& finan"ia** +ia#*e and 'n*o";& #oth indire"t andind'"ed $'*ti-*ier& that re&'*t fro$ in"rea&ed o-eratin/ e -endit're& )see Chapter + for indirect andinduced impacts*&

    (ndirect i$-a"t& of o-eratin/ e -endit're re*ate to the in"rea&ed de$and &ti$'*'& for e"ono$i"a"ti+itie& hi"h &'--* -rod'"t& and &er+i"e& re 'ired for the o-eration of &-ort& fa"i*itie&! (nduced i$-a"t& of o-eratin/ e -endit're& re*ate to the effe"t& of in"rea&ed "on&'$er &-endin/ a& a re&'*t ofin"rea&ed in"o$e re"ei+ed # -aid &taff at fa"i*itie&!

    E&&entia** , ea"h +o*'nteer -ro+ide& a finan"ia* &'#&id hi"h i& '&ed to f'nd the o-eratin/e -endit're& and the &a*arie& of -aid &taff! &&'$in/ that a +o*'nteer or;& for 5 ho'r& -er ee; ona+era/e, e e&ti$ate that ea"h +o*'nteer -ro+ide& a financial subsid& !orth ), +>> per &ear 19! he80 in+e&t$ent& $ade in 2011 are therefore e -e"ted to re 'ire the &'--ort of an additiona* 2,700+o*'nteer& -er ear! )e therefore e&ti$ate that the 45!9$ orth of in+e&t$ent& $ade in 2011 #he o'ndation i** #e &'--orted # +o*'nteerin/ a"ti+itie& that are orth 9!5$ -er ear in ter$&of e"ono$i" o't-'t to the e"ono$ !

    Direct employment benefits

    & di&"'&&ed, the re"r'it$ent of +o*'nteer &taff ena#*e& e$-*o ee& on the a/e #i** to #e"o$-en&ated &'ffi"ient* &o that the "an #e e$-*o ed on f'**=ti$e or -art=ti$e #a&i& e!/! for &ite$ana/e$ent, foot#a** de+e*o-$ent, $aintenan"e, "*eanin/ andIor #ar a"ti+itie& ! Ba&ed on thea+era/e ratio of -aid &taff to re"r'ited +o*'nteer& a"ro&& o-erated fa"i*itie& 1:4 , e e&ti$ate thatfor ever& >> volunteers recruited *+ individuals are able to be offered paid emplo&ment oneither a -art=ti$e or f'**=ti$e #a&i& on=&ite a& a re&'*t of the -roAe"t #e"o$in/ finan"ia** +ia#*ethro'/h in"o$e /eneration at *o "o&t!

    1" +alary data from the Office for ational +tatistics estimate the a%era#e annual wa#e of a part$time worker to be C118200!The national$le%el a%era#e number of hours worked part$time per week is 1 !

    Volunteers recruited+,erage num.er

    of ,olunteercoaches

    +,eragegeneral

    ,olunteers

    +,erage totalnum.er of,olunteers

    Artificial ?rass itch )A? s* 11 1, 29han#in# ooms and ?rass

    itches 21 22 43

    &ulti " 11 20

    +mall scale 1 17 30

    Total 1 1: 34

  • 8/9/2019 Exemplu de Analiza de Impact

    23/31

    23

    % Centre for E"ono$i"& and B'&ine&& (e&ear"h Ltd, 2012

    he $aAorit of +o*'nteerin/ #enefit& re*ate to the dire"t in"o$e=/eneratin/ and o-erationa*e -endit're& that are 'n*o";ed thro'/h their -arti"i-ation! o e+er, there i& a*&o an o--ort'nit forindi+id'a*& to /ain &;i**& and e -erti&e thro'/h "o$-*etin/ trainin/ "o'r&e&! n 2010I11, aro'nd t o=third& of &ite& he*d a tota* of 2,424 "o'r&e& hi"h ere "o$-*eted # 25,999 indi+id'a*&! Ba&ed onin+e&t$ent& $ade # the oot#a** o'ndation in 2011, e e&ti$ate that the "o$-*eted fa"i*itie& $a

    he*- an additional , *>> volunteers ain ne! 8ualifications ever& &ear*>

    !

    Income-generating activities of facilities

    he "o$-*eted fa"i*itie& f'nded # he o'ndation /enerate in"o$e fro$ the a"ti+itie& he*d on=&ite!hi& in"o$e finan"e& the o-eratin/ e -endit're& of the &ite, hi"h dri+e f'rther indire"t and ind'"ed#enefit& a&&o"iated ith in"rea&ed de$and for -rod'"t&I&er+i"e& re 'ired d'rin/ the o-eration of&-ort& fa"i*itie& and other &'--ortin/ e"ono$i" a"ti+itie& -'#*i" ho'&e&, #ar& and retai* &a*e of &-ort&e 'i-$ent ! he o-eratin/ in"o$e a*&o finan"e& the &taff "o&t& a&&o"iated ith hirin/ $ana/e$ent,$aintenan"e, #ar, "*eanin/, foot#a** de+e*o-$ent and "oa"hin/ &taff! a#*e 12 &ho & that aro'nd@!2 -en"e i& earned in ann'a* in"o$e for e+er 1 &-ent on "on&tr'"tion of fa"i*itie&! hi& e&ti$ate i&

    #a&ed on o-erationa* in"o$e data -ro+ided thro'/h the ann'a* onitorin/ and E+a*'ation JES'r+e "ond'"ted # he o'ndation!

    0a.le 1#: +,erage annual income per 8 spent on construction and total a,erage annual income from in,estmentsmade in #'117 .y in,estment type

    Source: The Football Foundation, Cebr analysis

    )e e&ti$ate that 45!9$ orth of "on&tr'"tion -roAe"t& f'nded in 2011 o'*d therefore ie*d ana+era/e ann'a* in"o$e of aro'nd 3!3$, hi"h o'*d fa"i*itate the o-eratin/ e -endit're& in"'rredhen r'nnin/ the "on&tr'"ted fa"i*itie&! (e+en'e &trea$& are t -i"a** /enerated thro'/h -it"h hire&for *ea/'e $at"he&, "oa"hin/ -ro/ra$$e& and trainin/ &e&&ion&! n addition, in"o$e &trea$& are

    /enerated thro'/h -*a erItea$ &'#&"ri-tion&, $e$#er&hi- fee& and #ar in"o$e! a"i*itie& are '&ed# a ran/e of /ro'-&, in"*'din/ foot#a** tea$&, &o""er &"hoo*&, "oa"he&, o'th "*'#&, *ea/'e& and&'$$er "a$-&!

    20 This is based on &onitorin# ' (%aluation data held by The ootball oundation which su##est around two$thirds of siteshelp an a%era#e of 0 %olunteers recei%e new Bualifications per year at each site!

    ncome generated +,erage annual income generatedper 8 spent on construction7 pence+,erage estimated annual income

    from in,estments in #'117 86

    Artificial ?rass itch )A? s* 1,!1p C0!"m

    9han#in# ooms and ?rassitches 2!,p C0!7m

    &ulti 7!:p C1!7m

    Total !2p C3!3m

  • 8/9/2019 Exemplu de Analiza de Impact

    24/31

    24

    % Centre for E"ono$i"& and B'&ine&& (e&ear"h Ltd, 2012

    *., /nput6output modellin and alternative multiplier concepts

    a+in/ a&&i/ned a "*a&&ifi"ation a/ain&t the ind'&trie& that i** /ro to -ro+ide for /ra&& root&fa"i*itie& de+e*o-$ent and o-eration ithin the &'--* =and='&e fra$e or;, e ere a#*e toe&ta#*i&h the &i?e of the e"ono$i" "ontri#'tion& $ade # thi& ind'&tr ! )e e&ti$ate the&e

    "ontri#'tion& '&in/ &tandard $etri"& re*atin/ to /ro&& +a*'e added >V21

    and -er"enta/e& of U6>D , and a#&o*'te and -er"enta/e &hare& of U6 e$-*o $ent!

    o $ea&'re #roader e"ono$i" "ontri#'tion& that "an #e e -e"ted to o""'r thro'/h the $'*ti-*ier-ro"e&&, e '&ed the a--roa"he& of a n'$#er of e**=;no n a'thoritie& in the area! hea--ro-riatene&& of the&e a*ternati+e& de-end& on ho the -re+ai*in/ $a"roe"ono$i" "ir"'$&tan"e&and -o*i"ie& are to #e inter-reted! he a*ternati+e a--roa"he& and the re*e+ant e"ono$i""ir"'$&tan"e& are o't*ined a& fo**o &!

    "eontief matri! multipliers for the domestic economy

    '*ti-*ier& &ho the ratio of an ind'"ed "han/e in nationa* in"o$e to an initia* "han/e in the *e+e* offina* de$and &-endin/, here the $'*ti-*ier effe"t denote& the -heno$enon here# &o$e initia*in"rea&e or de"rea&e in the rate of &-endin/ i** #rin/ a#o't a $ore than -ro-ortionate in"rea&eor de"rea&e in nationa* in"o$e! he 6e ne&ian a--roa"h #are* re 'ire& a $ention #'t i& +er$'"h /ro'nded in $a"roe"ono$i" ana* &i&, offerin/ *itt*e "a-a#i*it to ana* &e i$-a"t& of entitie&that are &$a**er than the ho*e e"ono$ !

    n-'t=o't-'t ana* &i&, d'e *ar/e* to the or; of )a&&i* Leontief 22, hi*e $a"roe"ono$i" in the&en&e that it in+o*+e& ana* &in/ the e"ono$ a& a ho*e, o e& it& fo'ndation& and te"hni 'e& to the$i"roe"ono$i" ana* &i& of -rod'"tion and "on&'$-tion! 23 ""ordin/ to ten (aa 2005 , &o$e-eo-*e ar/'e that in-'t=o't-'t ana* &i& i& at the interfa"e of #oth, definin/ it a& the &t'd of

    ind'&trie& or &e"tor& of the e"ono$ ! i/'re @ -ro+ide& a &"reen&hot of Ce#r.& Leontief n-'t= 't-'tode* d'rin/ the de+e*o-$ent &ta/e!

    21 ?EA or #ross %alue added is a measure of the %alue from production in the national accounts and can be thou#ht of as the %alue ofindustrial output less intermediate consumption! That is8 the %alue of what is producedless the %alue of the intermediate #oods andser%ices used as inputs to produce it! ?EA is also commonly known as income from production and is distributed in three directions toemployees8 to shareholders and to #o%ernment! ?EA is linked as a measurement to ?> both bein# a measure of economic output!That relationship is )?EA G Ta@es on products- +ubsidies on products H ?> *! ;ecause ta@es and subsidies on indi%idual productcate#ories are only a%ailable at the whole economy le%el )rather than at the sectoral or re#ional le%el*8 ?EA tends to be used formeasurin# thin#s like #ross re#ional domestic product and other measures of economic output of entities that are smaller than the wholeeconomy! 22 +ee8 for e@ample8 -eontief8

  • 8/9/2019 Exemplu de Analiza de Impact

    25/31

    25

    % Centre for E"ono$i"& and B'&ine&& (e&ear"h Ltd, 2012

    Figure %: Screenshot of -e.r Leontief nput?5utput 6odel

    Source: Cebr analysis

    he e**=;no n Leontief in+er&e $atri , hi"h &ho & the inter=ind'&tr de-enden"ie& of an

    e"ono$ , i& the #a&i& for -rod'"in/ &o="a**ed Gordinar . or traditiona* in-'t=o't-'t $'*ti-*ier&!he&e are &o$e of the $o&t i$-ortant too*& for $ea&'rin/ the tota* i$-a"t on o't-'t, e$-*o $entand in"o$e hen there i& a "han/e in fina* de$and!

    he Leontief in+er&e $atri "an a*&o #e de&"ri#ed a& the o't-'t re 'ire$ent& $atri for fina*de$and, that i&, it &ho & the in-'t re 'ire$ent& fro$ the other &e"tor& of the e"ono$ -er 'nit ofo't-'t -rod'"ed in the &e"tor 'nder e a$ination in re&-on&e to a fina* de$and &ti$'*'&! he$atri "an #e '&ed to -rod'"e t o t -e& of $'*ti-*ier the -e $'*ti-*ier in"or-oratin/ dire"tand indire"t &'--* "hain i$-a"t& and the -e $'*ti-*ier in"or-oratin/ ind'"ed thro'/h hi/herin"o$e& and re&'*tin/ /reater "on&'$-tion i$-a"t& a& e**!

  • 8/9/2019 Exemplu de Analiza de Impact

    26/31

    26

    % Centre for E"ono$i"& and B'&ine&& (e&ear"h Ltd, 2012

    , Grass root sports facilities( siDe economic contribution and impacts

    hi& &e"tion &et& o't the re&'*t& of o'r ana* &i&! Se"tion 3!1 "on&ider& the "ontri#'tion of /ra&& root&&-ort& fa"i*itie& to e"ono$i" o't-'t! Dire"t and $'*ti-*ier effe"t& are -re&ented! Se"tion 3!2"on&ider& the dire"t and $'*ti-*ier i$-a"t& of /ra&& root& &-ort& fa"i*itie& on e$-*o $ent!

    ,. Contribution of rass roots sports facilities to economic output

    Direct impacts

    he oot#a** o'ndation fa"i*itated in+e&t$ent& in "on&tr'"tion -roAe"t& orth a tota* of 45!9$ in2011! hi& i& e&ti$ated to *ead to 21!1$ #ein/ /enerated in dire"t >ro&& Va*'e dded >Vi$-a"t& d'rin/ the "on&tr'"tion and o-erationa* -ha&e 24! hi& "a*"'*ation i& #a&ed '-on the t -i"a*-rofit& and a/e& /enerated # the ind'&trie& re"ei+in/ the dire"t de$and &ti$'*'& of e -endit'reon "on&tr'"tion! )e ha+e '&ed U6=#a&ed S'--* and U&e ta#*e& to a"hie+e thi& "a*"'*ation! hi&a&&'$e& that the &'--* "hain "hara"teri&ti"& of a fir$ re"ei+in/ f'nd& for "on&tr'"tion #road*fo**o re*ation&hi-& itne&&ed at the nationa* *e+e*! >i+en that o'r findin/& &ho that aro'nd 73F ofthe dire"t e$-*o $ent i& &o'r"ed *o"a** , e "an a&&'$e that the *ion.& &hare of the >V in"rea&eo'*d a*&o #e e -erien"ed *o"a** !

    #ultiplier impacts

    'r findin/& &ho that the do$e&ti" 't-'t $'*ti-*ier Leontief $atri a--roa"h i& e 'a* to 2!53!hi& "an #e inter-reted in &i$-*e ter$& a& fo**o &: for e+er 1 of o't-'t /enerated dire"t* #

    "ontra"tor& re 'ired for /ra&& root& fa"i*it in+e&t$ent& and o-eration&, an additiona* 1!53 ofe"ono$i" o't-'t i& /enerated in the ider e"ono$ thro'/h indire"t and ind'"ed i$-a"t& 25! hede"o$-o&ition of the&e $'*ti-*ier i$-a"t& are i**'&trated and e -*ained f'rther in i/'re 7 #e*o ,'&in/ the +a*'e of 2!53 for the e&ti$ated 't-'t $'*ti-*ier #a&ed on 2009 S'--* and U&e data!

    24 ?EA is eBual to ?ross >omestic roduct less ta@es and subsidies on production! contributionof C21!7m

    2, .n comparison8 we ha%e estimated the a##re#ate /I 9onstruction industry Output multiplier to be 2! 0 based on 200"+upply and /se data!

  • 8/9/2019 Exemplu de Analiza de Impact

    27/31

    27

    % Centre for E"ono$i"& and B'&ine&& (e&ear"h Ltd, 2012

    Figure : -onstituent elements of the estimated domestic output multipliers

    Source: Cebr analysis

    he o'ndation "ontri#'te& aro'nd 33- in e+er 1 in+e&ted in "on&tr'"tion -roAe"t& ith there$ainder /enerated thro'/h -artner&hi- f'ndin/! n other ord&, e+er 33- in+e&ted # heo'ndation /enerate& a tota* 't-'t $'*ti-*ier i$-a"t of 2!53! hi& $ean& that the 15$"ontri#'ted # he o'ndation to ard& "on&tr'"tion -roAe"t& &tarted in 2011 /enerated a tota* of11@$ 2@ in e"ono$i" o't-'t!

    ,.* Contribution of rass roots sports facilities to emplo&ment

    Direct impacts

    n 2011, he o'ndation.& in+e&t$ent& are e&ti$ated to &'--ort dire"t tota* e$-*o $ent of @32 '**i$e E 'i+a*ent E& Ao#& d'rin/ the "on&tr'"tion and o-erationa* -ha&e! D'rin/ the "on&tr'"tion-ha&e, aro'nd 344 E Ao#& are "reated! --ro i$ate* 73F of *a#o'r i& &o'r"ed *o"a** d'rin/ the"on&tr'"tion -ro"e&&, hi"h e 'ate& to dire"t *o"a* e$-*o $ent i$-a"t& of 251 E Ao#&!

    D'rin/ the o-eration -ha&e, a tota* of 288 E Ao#& are &'--orted on"e "on&tr'"tion -roAe"t& are"o$-*eted and fa"i*itie& #e"o$e f'** o-erationa*! n addition, 2,700 +o*'nteer& -er ear aree -e"ted to he*- r'n the&e fa"i*itie& and 'nderta;e e"ono$i" a"ti+itie& hi"h are orth 9!5$ to thee"ono$ in ter$& of ann'a* e"ono$i" o't-'t! n addition, 3,200 +o*'nteer& are e -e"ted to /ainne 'a*ifi"ation& e+er ear thro'/h "o$-*etin/ trainin/ "o'r&e& at the&e f'nded fa"i*itie&!

    2 This fi#ure is calculated by applyin# the Output multiplier )2!,3* to the total in%estment of C4,!"m!

    "irect impact)

    /ndirect impact)>. -

    /nduced impact)>.+@

    The Foundation9se$penditure on

    construction pro7ectstri ers suppl& response

    from contractor. /nproducin 9 or providin

    its services thecontractor producesadditional output.

    Assume that the initial )e$penditure produces )of additional output b&contractor. This ) ofoutput is the direct

    output impact of the )increment in e$penditureon construction pro7ects

    :

    To increase its suppl&contractors must

    increase its demands onits suppliers !ho

    increase demands ontheir suppliers and so on

    throu h the suppl&chain. This eneratesthe indirect impact an

    increase in outputthrou hout the suppl&

    chain of )>. - for ever&additional ) of

    contractor output

    :

    The combined direct andindirect impacts have an

    impact on householdincome throu hout the

    econom& throu hincreased emplo&ment

    profits etc. A proportionof this income !ill be re6spent on final oods and

    services producin asuppl& response b& the

    producers of theseoods services and

    further impacts throu htheir suppl& chains etc.

    This produces the inducedimpact of )>.+@ of outputfor ever& additional ) of

    construction output

    Football Foundation UK output multiplier ; )*.+,

    ; Total impact)*.+,

    Football Foundation9sfundin)>.,,

    'artnership fundin)>.@@

    Total /nvestment)

    ;

    :

  • 8/9/2019 Exemplu de Analiza de Impact

    28/31

    28

    % Centre for E"ono$i"& and B'&ine&& (e&ear"h Ltd, 2012

    #ultiplier impacts

    he do$e&ti" e$-*o $ent $'*ti-*ier Leontief $atri a--roa"h i& e 'a* to 2!18 27! hi& "an #einter-reted in &i$-*e ter$& a& fo**o &: for e+er one E Ao# /enerated dire"t* # "ontra"tor&re 'ired for /ra&& root& fa"i*it in+e&t$ent& and o-eration&, an additiona* 1!18 E Ao#& are e -e"ted

    to #e /enerated in the ider e"ono$ thro'/h indire"t and ind'"ed i$-a"t&! he de"o$-o&ition ofthe $'*ti-*ier i$-a"t i& i**'&trated and e -*ained in the &a$e $anner a& the 't-'t $'*ti-*ier!

    Figure &: -onstituent elements of the estimated domestic employment multipliers

    Source: Cebr analysis

    & a re&'*t of he o'ndation.& in+e&t$ent& in 2011, a tota* of @32 E Ao#& are e -e"ted to #edirectly &'--orted d'rin/ the "on&tr'"tion and o-eration -ha&e! >i+en an E$-*o $ent $'*ti-*ier of2!18, e anti"i-ate that an additiona* 74@ E Ao#& o'*d #e &'--orted d'e to indire"t and ind'"edi$-a"t&! hi& $ean& that in tota*, 1,378 E Ao#& are e -e"ted to #e &'--orted a& a re&'*t of heo'ndation.& in+e&t$ent& in 2011!

    27 .n comparison8 we ha%e estimated the a##re#ate /I 9onstruction industry (mployment multiplier to be 3!0: based on200" +upply and /se data!

    "irect impact FTE

    /ndirect impact>.@= FTE

    /nduced impact>.+> FTE

    The Foundation9se$penditure on

    construction pro7ectsservices tri ers suppl&

    response from contractor./n producin 9 or providin

    their servicesC thecontractor hires additional

    staff. Assume sufficiente$penditure on

    contractor9s services toenerate additional FTE 7ob. This FTE 7ob is the

    direct emplo&ment impactof the relevant increment

    in e$penditure onconstruction pro7ects

    :

    To increase its suppl&Ccontractors must

    increase its demands onits suppliersC !ho

    increase demands ontheir suppliers and so ondo!n the suppl& chain.

    This enerates theindirect impactC an

    increase in emplo&mentthrou hout the suppl&

    chain of >.@= of a FTE forever& additional FTE in

    construction

    :

    The combined direct andindirect impacts have an

    impact on householdincome throu hout the

    econom&C throu h increasedemplo&mentC profits etc. Aproportion of this income!ill be re6spent on final

    oods and servicesCproducin a suppl& response

    b& the producers of theseoodsGservices and further

    impacts throu h theirsuppl& chains etc. Thisproduces the induced

    impact of >.+> of a FTE forever& additional FTE in

    construction

    Football Foundation UK emplo&ment multiplier ; *. =

  • 8/9/2019 Exemplu de Analiza de Impact

    29/31

    29

    % Centre for E"ono$i"& and B'&ine&& (e&ear"h Ltd, 2012

    4 Conclusions

    & di&"'&&ed ear*ier on in thi& re-ort, #oo&tin/ the "on&tr'"tion &e"tor ho*d& a &trate/i" i$-ortan"eto U6 e"ono$ , /i+en that *a"; of a"ti+it in the &e"tor ha& #een the *ar/e&t do n ard "ontri#'torto >D /ro th in re"ent 'arter&! n+e&t$ent in "on&tr'"tion -roAe"t& /enerate e"ono$i" o't-'t$'*ti-*ier& hi"h /o a#o+e and #e ond the initia* in+e&t$ent! )e ha+e &ho n that in+e&t$ent in/ra&& root& &-ort& fa"i*itie& doe& e a"t* thi&, /eneratin/ an additiona* 1!53 in o't-'t for e+er 1in+e&ted! he 't-'t $'*ti-*ier for a t -i"a* G rt&, entertain$ent or re"reation. a"ti+it i& 2!22hi"h "o$-are& to he o'ndation.& 't-'t $'*ti-*ier of 2!53! n+e&t$ent& in 2011 # heo'ndation are e&ti$ated to ha+e "ontri#'ted 53$ in ter$& of >D to the U6 e"ono$ ! 'rfindin/& a*&o &ho that there are &i/nifi"ant e$-*o $ent i$-a"t& fro$ &'"h in+e&t$ent& anadditiona* Ao# i& "reated indire"t* for e+er Ao# re 'ired to either #'i*d or r'n a fa"i*it !

    he i$-a"t& on the *o"a* "o$$'nit are a*&o fe*t e"ono$i"a** and &o"ia** ! he &'#"ontra"torin/ on "on&tr'"tion -roAe"t& f'nded # he o'ndation re"r'it aro'nd 73F of their *a#o'r*o"a** ! hi& $ean& that the e"ono$i" #enefit& of the -roAe"t are rea*i&ed ithin the *o"a* area hi"hin"rea&e& &'--ort for and a arene&& of f'nded &ite& ithin "o$$'nitie&! )hi*&t the fa"i*itie&"on&tr'"ted do /enerate o-eratin/ in"o$e of their o n, a &i/nifi"ant +o*'nteerin/ effort i& a*&ore 'ired to r'n the fa"i*itie& and de*i+er foot#a** de+e*o-$ent! Vo*'nteerin/ therefore -*a & a "r'"ia*ro*e in $a;in/ the e"ono$i"& of /ra&& root& &-ort& fa"i*itie& &'&taina#*e! or e+er 100 +o*'nteer&re"r'ited, 25 e$-*o ee& "an #e -aid on either a -art=ti$e or f'**=ti$e #a&i&! hi& ena#*e& -aid"oa"he& and foot#a** de+e*o-$ent &taff to r'n "oa"hin/ and trainin/ -ro/ra$$e& in *o"a*"o$$'nitie&! t a*&o $ean& that tho'&and& of +o*'nteer& "an /ain ne 'a*ifi"ation& e+er ear ine "han/e for their ti$e! t -i"a* +o*'nteer at a /ra&& &-ort& fa"i*it &-end& aro'nd 5 ho'r& -er ee;on=&ite!

    &ide fro$ the #oo&t to ho'&eho*d in"o$e& and e$-*o $ent &'--orted # the "on&tr'"tion and

    o-erationa* -ha&e& of fa"i*itie&, there are other e"ono$i" #enefit& to "on&ider! $-ro+in/ '-on and#'i*din/ ne *o"a* fa"i*itie& -*a & a -art in in"rea&in/ the attra"ti+ene&& of an area to *i+e in!a";a/ed ith the ri/ht &et of additiona* $ea&'re&, e!/!, #etter tran&-ort, ho'&in/, a""e&& to&er+i"e&, there i& an o--ort'nit to attra"t ne or;er& and e$-*o er& into 'nder=e$-*o ed area&!he&e Gre/eneration i$-a"t&. are o+er and a#o+e the tota* dire"t, indire"t and ind'"ed i$-a"t&/ained fro$ the initia* in+e&t$ent! he re/eneration i$-a"t& of he o'ndation.& in+e&t$ent& arefe*t $ore in area& here 'ne$-*o $ent rate& are into do'#*e=di/it&! n 2011, he o'ndation ha&in+e&ted in to n& and "itie& &'"h a& idd*ero'/h, Lei"e&ter, Bir$in/ha$ and S'nder*and hi"h#et een the$ had an a+era/e 'ne$-*o $ent rate of 14!2F!

    he hea*th #enefit& fro$ #etter a""e&& to &-ort& fa"i*itie& are a*&o i$-ortant to &t'd a& -art of the

    e"ono$i" "a&e! &t'd on the effe"t& of a nationa* hea*th -ro$otion initiati+e r'n # En/*i&hre$ier Lea/'e and "ha$-ion&hi- "*'#& &ho ed that foot#a** -ro+ide& another a+en'e for rea"hin/$en ith "hroni" hea*th "ondition& ho do not t -i"a** "on&'*t their > or &ee; ad+i"e fro$ ahea*th -rofe&&iona*28! a;in/ -art in a"ti+itie& at *o"a* &-ort& fa"i*itie& i$-ro+e& -h &i"a* ed'"ationand "an *ead to #etter -h &i"a* fitne&& and hea*thier *ife&t *e&! hi& red'"e& the in"iden"e of $an"hroni" "ondition& hi"h "ontri#'te& to *o er nationa* hea*th"are treat$ent "o&t& and hi/her *a#o'r-rod'"ti+it !

    2: remier -ea#ue ealth A national pro#ramme of men5s health promotion deli%ered in6by professional football clubsinal report 20128 -eeds &etropolitan /ni%ersity

  • 8/9/2019 Exemplu de Analiza de Impact

    30/31

    30

    % Centre for E"ono$i"& and B'&ine&& (e&ear"h Ltd, 2012

    C'rrent* , on* aro'nd 5F of ad'*t& /et at *ea&t 30 $in'te& of $oderate e er"i&e e!/! a*;in/," "*in/, /ardenin/, ho'&e or; and &-ort& on fi+e or $ore da & of the ee; 29! ro'nd 2@F of ad'*t&are o#e&e hi*&t @3F are "*a&&ified a& #ein/ o+er ei/ht or o#e&e! )e e&ti$ate that o#e&it "'rrent*"o&t& the U6 e"ono$ aro'nd 3#n -er ear in H S treat$ent "o&t& and 1#n ear in -rod'"ti+it*o&&e&30! B 2025, aro'nd 40F of indi+id'a*& are fore"a&t to #e o#e&e a& a re&'*t of *o *e+e*& of

    -h &i"a* a"ti+it , ri"her diet& and $ore &edentar *ife&t *e&31

    ! $on/&t "hi*dren a/ed #et een 2 and15, on* a 'arter 27F a"hie+e at *ea&t 1 ho'r of $oderate e er"i&e ea"h da ! n+e&t$ent in *o"a*fa"i*itie& o'*d i$-ro+e a""e&& to &-ort& and e er"i&e for fa$i*ie& ith "hi*dren, a& e** a& red'"etran&-ort "o&t& for tho&e $a;in/ *on/er di&tan"e tri-&! oot#a** i& the $o&t -o-'*ar &-ort& a"ti+ita$on/&t "hi*dren a/ed #et een 11 and 15, and the &e"ond $o&t -o-'*ar &-ort for "hi*dren 'nder 10after & i$$in/ 32!

    n "on"*'&ion, there are #etter e"ono$i", &o"ia* and hea*th o't"o$e& a&&o"iated ith in+e&t$ent& in/ra&& root& &-ort& fa"i*itie&! o&t of the&e #enefit& are ;e-t ithin the *o"a* "o$$'nit andtherefore &'--ort re/eneration effort& in area& hi"h are -arti"'*ar* 'ndere$-*o ed! n a &trate/i"*e+e*, e ha+e &ho n that in+e&t$ent in the "on&tr'"tion &e"tor o'*d &'--ort e"ono$i" /ro th

    and Ao#& a"ro&& the ho*e e"ono$ ! Co$$er"ia* and re&identia* "on&tr'"tion a"ti+it ha& #een *eft#e*ea/'ered # in"rea&in/* +o*ati*e and 'n"ertain e"ono$i" "ondition&! he "'rrent en+iron$ent i&"hara"teri&ed # hi/her f'ndin/ "o&t& and red'"ed -ri+ate &e"tor in+e&t$ent! & &'"h, a*ternati+e&o'r"e& of in+e&t$ent, &'"h a& thro'/h the hird &e"tor a--ear to #e an attra"ti+e &o*'tion for&'--ortin/ /ro th in the "on&tr'"tion ind'&tr a& e** a& the ider e"ono$ !

    2" +tatistics on obesity8 physical acti%ity and diet (n#land8 20128 + The .nformation 9entre or ealth And +ocial 9are30 9ebr report on ealth pled#es ;upa ealth and

  • 8/9/2019 Exemplu de Analiza de Impact

    31/31