exercise: tactical grammar construction for generation

35
Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation Construct a systemic-functional grammar that can generate (at least) the following sentences: 1. John saw Mary. 2. Did John see Mary? 3. Mary was seen by John. 4. The woman saw John. 5. The ball is green. 6. The woman saw the green ball. 7. The woman saw the ball that was green. Think of the semantics involved in each case, too.

Upload: regina

Post on 05-Jan-2016

50 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation Construct a systemic-functional grammar that can generate (at least) the following sentences: 1.John saw Mary. 2.Did John see Mary? 3.Mary was seen by John. 4.The woman saw John. 5.The ball is green. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

Construct a systemic-functional grammar that can generate (at least) the following sentences:

1. John saw Mary.

2. Did John see Mary?

3. Mary was seen by John.

4. The woman saw John.

5. The ball is green.

6. The woman saw the green ball.

7. The woman saw the ball that was green.

Think of the semantics involved in each case, too.

Page 2: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

Steps to a solution (1):constructing the network

1. Consider the linguistic functions of each clause

2. Consider the linguistic functions of each of the constituents of each clause

3. Consider which constituent-functions reoccur in different clauses

4. Consider in which orders and in which combinations the constituent-functions occur

Page 3: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

Clause functions

1. John saw Mary.

2. Did John see Mary?

3. Mary was seen by John.

4. The woman saw John.

5. The ball is green.

6. The woman saw the green ball.

7. The woman saw the ball that was green.

Statement

Yes-no-question

Statement

Statement

Statement

Statement

Statement

Page 4: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

A first ‘decision point’ or grammatical system

statement

Yes-no-question

Page 5: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

Constituent functions

1. [John] saw [Mary].

3. [Mary] was seen [by [John]].

4. [The woman] saw [John].

5. [The ball] is [green].

6. [The woman] saw [the green ball].

7. [The woman] saw [the ball that was green].

Statement

Statement

Statement

Statement

Statement

Statement

Page 6: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

Constituent functions

1. [John] saw [Mary].

3. [Mary] was seen [by [John]].

4. [The woman] saw [John].

5. [The ball] is [green].

6. [The woman] saw [the green ball].

7. [The woman] saw [the ball that was green].

Statement

Statement

Statement

Statement

Statement

Statement

Page 7: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

Constituent functions

[John] saw [Mary].

[The woman] saw [John].

[The woman] saw [the green ball].

[The woman] saw [the ball that was green].

Page 8: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

Constituent functions

[John] saw [Mary].

[The woman] saw [John].

[The woman] saw [the green ball].

[The woman] saw [the ball that was green].

The one who senses something

The entity of phenomenon sensed

Senser Phenomenon

Page 9: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

Constituent functions

sawSenser Phenomenon

[John][Mary]

Process

[The woman]

[John]

[the green ball]

[the ball that was green]

Page 10: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

Constituent functions

Senser PhenomenonProcess

+Senser+Process+Phenomenon

Senser^ProcessProcess^Phenomenon

Page 11: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

Constituent functions

sawSenser Phenomenon

[John][Mary]

Process

[The woman]

[John]

[the green ball]

[the ball that was green]

Page 12: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

Constituent functions

! saw

Senser

Phenomenon

[John]

[John]

[Mary]

[the green ball]

[the ball that was green]

Process

[The woman]

NP / nominal groups NP / nominal groups

Page 13: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

A first ‘decision point’ or grammatical system

statement

Yes-no-question

+Senser+Process+Phenomenon

Page 14: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

Constituent functions

1. [John] saw [Mary].

3. [Mary] was seen [by [John]].

4. [The woman] saw [John].

5. [The ball] is [green].

6. [The woman] saw [the green ball].

7. [The woman] saw [the ball that was green].

Statement

Statement

Statement

Statement

Statement

Statement

Page 15: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

Constituent functions

1. [John] saw [Mary].

3. [Mary] was seen [by [John]].

4. [The woman] saw [John].

5. [The ball] is [green].

6. [The woman] saw [the green ball].

7. [The woman] saw [the ball that was green].

Statement

Statement

Statement

Statement

Statement

Statement

Page 16: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

Constituent functions

5. [The ball] is [green].

? ?Process

is

Page 17: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

Constituent functions

5. [The ball] is [green].

? ?Process

is

The thing that carries some property

The property that is attributed

Carrier Attribute

Page 18: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

Constituent functions

! is

Carrier

Attribute[green]

Process

[The ball]

NP / nominal groups Adjectival phrase / Adjective

Page 19: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

A first ‘decision point’ or grammatical system

statement

Yes-no-question

+Senser+Process+Phenomenon

Page 20: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

A second ‘decision point’ or grammatical system

statement

Yes-no-question

+Senser+Process+Phenomenon

sensing

attributing+Carrier+Process+Attribute

Page 21: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

A second ‘decision point’ or grammatical system

statement

Yes-no-question

+Senser+Phenomenon

sensing

attributing+Carrier+Attribute

+Process

Page 22: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

Constituent functions

3. [Mary] was seen [by [John]].

Page 23: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

Constituent functions

3. [Mary] was seen [by [John]].

? ?Process

was seen

The entity of phenomenon sensed

The one who senses something

Phenomenon Senser

Page 24: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

Grammatical proportionalities

John saw the ball : The ball was seen by John

::The woman saw the boy : The boy was seen by the woman

::John saw Mary : Mary was seen by John

::

[active clause] : [passive clause]

Page 25: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

Grammatical proportionalities

John saw the ball : The ball was seen by John

::The woman saw the boy : The boy was seen by the woman

::John saw Mary : Mary was seen by John

::

[active clause] : [passive clause]

Senser / SubjectProcess :: activeform

Phenomenon / SubjectProcess :: passiveform

Page 26: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

A third ‘decision point’ or grammatical system

statement

Yes-no-question

+Senser+Phenomenon

sensing

attributing+Carrier+Attribute

+Process

Page 27: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

A third ‘decision point’ or grammatical system

statement

Yes-no-question

+Senser+Phenomenon

sensing

attributing+Carrier+Attribute

+Process

passive

activeSenser / SubjectProcess :: activeform

Phenomenon / SubjectProcess :: passiveform

Page 28: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

A third ‘decision point’ or grammatical system

statement

Yes-no-question

+Senser+Phenomenon

sensing

attributing+Carrier+Attribute

+Process

passive

activeSenser / SubjectProcess :: activeform

Phenomenon / SubjectProcess :: passiveform

Subject^Process

Subject/Carrier

Page 29: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

Clause functions

2. Did John see Mary?Yes-no-question

Page 30: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

Clause functions

2. Did John see Mary?Yes-no-question

Process

Finite

Senser Phenomenon

Subject

Senser / SubjectProcess :: activeform

Finite^Subject

Page 31: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

A third ‘decision point’ or grammatical system

statement

Yes-no-question

+Senser+Phenomenon

sensing

attributing+Carrier+Attribute

+Process

passive

activeSenser / SubjectProcess :: activeform

Phenomenon / SubjectProcess :: passiveform

Subject^Process

Subject/Carrier

+Subject

Page 32: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

A third ‘decision point’ or grammatical system

statement

Yes-no-question

+Senser+Phenomenon

sensing

attributing+Carrier+Attribute

+Process

passive

activeSenser / SubjectProcess :: activeform

Phenomenon / SubjectProcess :: passiveform

Subject^Finite

Subject/Carrier

Finite^Subject

+Subject

Page 33: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

One “micro-grammar” for the exercise clauses: version 1

statement

Yes-no-question

+Senser+Phenomenon

sensing

attributing+Carrier+Attribute

+Subject+Process+Finite passive

activeSenser / SubjectProcess :: activeform

Phenomenon / SubjectProcess :: passiveform

Subject^FiniteFinite/Process

Subject/Carrier

Finite^Subject

Page 34: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

One “micro-grammar” for the exercise clauses: version 2

statement

Yes-no-question

+Senser+Phenomenon

sensing

attributing+Carrier+Attribute

+Subject +Process+Finite

passive

activeSenser / SubjectProcess :: activeform

Phenomenon / SubjectProcess :: passiveformSubject^Finite

Finite/Process

Subject/Carrier

Finite^Subject

Page 35: Exercise: Tactical grammar construction for generation

NP or nominal group functions

[John]

[Mary]

[The woman]

[the green ball]

[the ball that was green]

?[the ball]