Exhibit 1: Murders in England and Wales 1967-2002: when rates doubled.

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1967

1968

1969

1970

1971

1972

1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

/819

98/9

1999

/020

00/1

2001

/2 0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

Number per year to left, rate per million on right. Source: Prime Suspect

Exhibit 2: Chances per million per year by age and sex: who is most often murdered

40 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 400

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

Men to the left, women to the right, rate per million per year. Source: Prime Suspect

Exhibit 3: Changes in murder rate in Britain 1981-1985 to 1996-2000, by age and sex

-100% -50% 0% 50% 100%

01-4 '5-9 '

10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84

85+

Men to the left, women to the right, change in 15 year rate. Source: Prime Suspect

Exhibit 4: Polarisation by area by poverty over time: changes at the extremes

050

100150200250300

least poor poorest

1981-85

1996-00

National murder rate: 100. Comparison of extreme deciles. Source: Prime Suspect

Exhibit 5: Method of killing by area poverty rate 1981-2000: how murders are committed

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%po

ores

t

deci

le 9

deci

le 8

deci

le 7

deci

le 6

deci

le 5

deci

le 4

deci

le 3

deci

le 2

leas

t poo

r

otherfirearmstranglepoisonfightcutting

All murders for which method recorded shown as proportion. Source: Prime Suspect

Exhibit 6: murder rates per million men in Britain by age/cohort (post 1965/1980)

Year 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000

Age11 1 1 3 3 2 1 1 312 1 2 4 5 3 2 3 513 2 3 6 6 4 3 4 614 5 5 6 7 6 4 5 715 7 8 11 12 10 9 11 1116 13 13 17 19 17 17 19 1717 21 21 23 24 25 26 27 2618 24 24 27 28 28 31 35 3519 24 25 30 31 28 30 37 4220 26 29 32 33 30 32 41 4921 31 33 34 34 35 36 42 5122 32 34 34 32 33 32 34 4223 29 31 33 31 27 27 30 3424 26 29 33 33 29 27 30 3325 28 30 33 34 31 27 27 3026 27 29 31 30 28 26 29 3127 21 23 27 27 24 25 33 3628 20 21 26 24 21 26 35 3829 23 23 23 20 23 30 36 3730 24 25 24 24 26 30 30 3131 23 24 26 27 27 26 27 3032 24 25 25 24 25 27 29 3133 24 28 25 21 23 27 30 3234 22 27 26 22 21 24 31 3935 19 25 27 21 17 22 30 3636 20 27 29 22 18 21 25 2637 21 26 28 23 20 19 21 2438 20 23 26 25 21 18 21 2539 20 23 26 26 23 22 24 2540 22 23 24 25 25 25 25 2441 24 22 22 23 26 25 23 2442 22 22 21 21 24 23 22 2743 17 20 19 17 19 22 23 2544 15 18 19 16 18 23 22 1845 15 19 20 19 19 21 18 1346 16 18 19 19 18 17 15 1547 15 17 17 16 15 16 18 1848 13 15 16 14 16 20 21 1949 14 16 15 14 17 21 22 2050 17 18 15 14 16 17 17 18

Smoothed rates shown. Diagonal is the 1965 cohort. Source: Prime Suspect

Exhibit 7: gun crime is minor, but that isNot the impression you gain from this:

Gun crime has increased

-

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

1997/98 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02

Num

ber o

f Crim

es

Total Recorded Crimes Involving Firearms (other than air weapons)

Source: Home Office

Burglaries vs Deprivation for England's Cities, 2001

0

10

20

30

40

50

0 20 40 60 80 100

Index of Multiple Deprivation Score

Bur

glar

ies

per 1

000

peop

le

Exhibit 8Source: www.shef.ac.uk/sasi/socr

Burglaries vs Deprivation for England's Cities, 2001

0

10

20

30

40

50

0 20 40 60 80 100

Index of Multiple Deprivation Score

Bur

glar

ies

per 1

000

peop

le

Liverpool

Hull

Aldershot

LeedsRochdale

Exhibit 9Source: www.shef.ac.uk/sasi/socr

Robberies vs Deprivation for England's Cities, 2001

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

0 20 40 60 80 100Index of Multiple Deprivation Score

Rob

berie

s pe

r 100

0 pe

ople

Exhibit 10

Source: www.shef.ac.uk/sasi/socr

Robberies vs Deprivation for England's Cities, 2001

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

0 20 40 60 80 100Index of Multiple Deprivation Score

Rob

berie

s pe

r 100

0 pe

ople

Hull Liverpool

Birmingham

ManchesterLondon

Exhibit 11

Source: www.shef.ac.uk/sasi/socr

Exhibit 12: Road deaths (1m)

Source: www.worldmapper.org

Exhibit 13: Are bank charges legal?

• 7 June 2006• ROBBER BANKS• Customers hit for £4.7bn a year in

penalty charges for straying into red

For more details see http://www.thisismoney.co.ukFrom where the following template was borrowed:

Source: www.mirror.co.uk/mirrormoney/

Exhibit 14: One suggested template:

• Dear Sir/Madam, • Ref: account number: (your account number) • I understand that the charges applied to my account in relation to the

following (enter details of what charges were for) are unlawful. • When I opened my account I entered into a contract with you, at which time

you agreed to act lawfully. The fees you have been applying to my account in relation to the above are unlawful under Common Law, Statute and consumer regulations.

• You have taken (enter charges amount here) from me, plus the following in (enter overdraft interest amount here) overdraft interest and I would like to request repayment of this (enter total sum) total sum. I also ask you to ensure any default notices entered against my credit record are removed entirely.

• Please repay this money in full and remove any default notices within 14 days. If this is not done, I will begin a claim against you for the full amount, plus interest and my costs.

• Yours sincerely,

Source: http://www.thisismoney.co.uk

Exhibit 15: Stillbirths (3.3m)

Source: www.worldmapper.org

Exhibit 16: Mortality within seven days (3m)

Source: www.worldmapper.org

Exhibit 17: Infant mortality (7.2m)

Source: www.worldmapper.org

Exhibit 18: Mortality at ages 1 to 4 (3.2m)

Source: www.worldmapper.org

Exhibit 19: Medicines Exports (gross, net $46bn)

Source: www.worldmapper.org

Exhibit 20: Royalties and licence fees – gross exports (2002, $84bn per year)

Source: www.worldmapper.org

Exhibit 21:More than 25 million people have died of AIDS since it was first diagnosed in the early

1980s; almost 3 million of these deaths occurred in

2005.

Source: www.worldmapper.org