existing centralized application services aacomas/osteopathic
TRANSCRIPT
Existing Centralized Application Services
• AACOMAS/Osteopathic Medicine 95% - 19 out of 20
• AMCAS/Allopathic Medicine 95% - 114 out of 126
• AACPMAS/Podiatric Medicine 86% - 6 out of 7
• AADSAS/Dental Medicine 98% - 54 Schools out of 56
• CASPA/Physician Assistant 69% - 90 out of 133 (started 2001)
• PharmCAS/Pharmacy 48% - 43 out of 84 (started 2002)
• VMCAS /Veterinary Medicine 82% - 29 out of 35
• TMDSAS/Texas State Schools 100%
• LSAC/Law Schools 100% - 176 out of 176 schools
Joan J. Anson, MS Ed.Johns Hopkins University
Elaine E Boston, DrPHTulane University Jacqui R. ComshawYale School of Public Health
Arthur J. Culbert, PhDBoston University Judy DawsonOhio State University Mary M. Derkach, JD, MSISUniversity of Pittsburgh Angela EverettUniversity of South Carolina Michael GreenUniversity of South Florida Joan P. PasiukUniversity of Minnesota
Nancy Patton Saint Louis University Nancy A. Persily, MPHUniversity at Albany SUNY
Angela Everett
University of South Carolina
Michael Green
University of South Florida
Vincent James, BS, MBA, MA, MS
Harvard School of Public Health
Robert F. Meenan, MD, MPH, MBA
Boston University
Mark Robson, PhD, MPH
UMDNJ
Centralized Application Service Advisory CommitteeWilliam H. Harvey, PhD
Earlham College and NAAHP liaison
O. Ray Kling, PhD
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Rick Love
Univ. of California - Berkeley
Ngina Lythcott, Dr.P.H.
Columbia University
Rick Love
Univ. of California – Berkeley
Dianne Wynn, M.Ed
University of North Texas
Joseph Harvey
University of Arkansas
Sandra C. Quinn, PhD
University of Pittsburgh
Aundra Shields, JD
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Jane M. Smith
George Washington University
Mary Ann Smith, Ph.D.
University of Texas
Chris TischUniversity of Arizona Health Sciences Center
Dorian ThomasUniversity of Illinois at Chicago
Tanya Uden-Holman, PhDUniversity of Iowa
Jody Usher, Ph.D.Emory University
Central Application Service
Outcom e Reporting
Data Action
D istribution
Bundle/P ackaging
Calculation
Verification
Authentication
Data C ollection
W eb ApplicationEntry Poin t
Central Application Service
Home U niversity Public Health P rogram s
Program Data Applican t Version
H om e U n ive rs ityO u tcom es D a ta
R esou rce C ap tu reR evenue
P ub lic H e a lth P rog ram sF in a l D a ta
B en ch m ark ingE ffic ie n cy
A S P HA sse ssm e nt
A dvo ca cyS tra te g ic P lann ing
A dviso rsD a ta Ba se d A d v ice
P a rtn e rsR ecru itm e nt
L O R A u tho rsE ngaged
E nviro n m e n ta l S canM e m be r S erv ices
A S P H C A S
A S P H C A S
Applicants Advisors Reference/Authors
Centralized Application Services
Benefits to students
√ Eliminates need for multiple reporting of information to multiple schools√ Ease of applying to more than one school√ Applicants have opportunity to learn about other SPH
Benefits to schools√ May eliminate need for expensive proprietary software (e.g. ApplyYourself)√ Less time spent on collecting data. No need to verify information and assemble application materials√ SPH will have better information about application populations as a whole√ SPH will better able to recruit new applicants (geography, demographics)√ Polished consistent image to SPH√ SPH will learn best practices from colleagues
Centralized Application Service Participant List as of May 5, 2005
√√√√ University at Albany SUNY School of Public Health
√√√√ Mel and Enid Zuckerman Arizona College of Public Health
√√√√ Boston University School of Public Health
√√√√ Harvard School of Public Health
√√√√ University of Oklahoma College of Public Health
√√√√ Saint Louis University School of Public Health
√√√√ Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine
√√√√ Yale University School of Public Health
√√√ Minnesota University School of Public Health
√√√ Emory University Rollins School of Public Health
√√√√ Denotes school is interested in participating in first cycle
√√√ Denotes school is interested in participating in later cycle
√√ Denotes school is interested but for internal reasons, unlikely to participate in first few years
√ Denotes school is not interested