expanding the sotl landscape · issotl 2016: next steps ctsi knowledge mobilization strategy: full...
TRANSCRIPT
Expanding the SoTL Landscape:Using a study on mentoring for teaching to mobilize new research and practices
CarolRolheiser,MeganBurnett,GregoryHum,AndreaGraham&CoraMcCloy(UniversityofToronto)October13,2017,InternationalScholarshipofTeachingandLearning(ISSOTL)Conference,Calgary,Alberta
Today’s presentation:1. Study Context 2. Our Inquiry Focus: Mentoring for Teaching and the
Role of Knowledge Mobilization (KMb)3. Literature Review4. Study Overview5. Conclusions and Next Steps6. Q & A
Canada’s
LARGESTuniversity
17 faculties/divisions
3 city campusesCOMPLEX &decentralizedinstitutionalmodel
87,000+students
14,000+faculty
CONTEXT
WhatrolecanKnowledgeMobilization(KMb) strategies,usedbyateachingcentre,playinprovidingaframeworkfor facultydevelopmentfocusedonadvancingthepracticeandimpactofmentoringforteaching?
Our Inquiry Focus
TWOUOFTINSTITUTIONALSURVEYS:
1. CollaborativeonAcademicCareersinHigherEducation(COACHE,2012)
2. SpeakingUp(2014)3. QualitativeFollow-upStudy(2016)
Mentoring for Teaching at U of T: Previous Research
Goals:• ToReview theliteratureandsituatedmentoringforteachingwithinthebroaderfacultymentoringfield• ToCapture currentfacultymentoringforteachinginitiativesandfacultyexperiencesatUofT,especially
personalstories• ToProvide UofT-specificcontextanddatatoinformanevidence-basedseriesofresourcesforvarious
stakeholders• ToGuide evidence-basedprogrammingforourT&LCentre
TWOUOFTINSTITUTIONALSURVEYS:
1. CollaborativeonAcademicCareersinHigherEducation(COACHE,2012)
2. SpeakingUp(2014)3. QualitativeFollow-upStudy(2016)
Mentoring for Teaching at U of T: Previous Research
Goals:• ToReview theliteratureandsituatedmentoringforteachingwithinthebroaderfacultymentoringfield• ToCapture currentfacultymentoringforteachinginitiativesandfacultyexperiencesatUofT,especially
personalstories
• ToProvide UofT-specificcontextanddatatoinformanevidence-basedseriesofresourcesforvariousstakeholders
• ToGuide evidence-basedprogrammingforT&LCentres.
LIKE MANY UNIVERSITIES WORLDWIDE….
“… Canada’s universities and Tri-Council Agencies are placing more emphasis on knowledge mobilization in order to generate research with a high social utility and to get research into the hands of decision-makers, policy-makers, and practitioners” (McKean, 2016, p.2)
“… how generated knowledge will be put to use, inform practice, or advance research.”
(SSHRC, 2016).
Knowledge Mobilization is ...
Related Literature- Focusedreview:educationrealm(healthand
businesshavelongerhistoriesofworkonKMb)
- Levin(2004);Cooper(2014):processesandcontextwhereKMb takesplace– andtheroleofintermediaries(e.g.,theroleofTeachingCentresasaplacetoconnectresearchproducersandusers,isoneareaofinterest)
- “Intermediariesoftenplayasignificantroleininterpreting,packaging,anddistributingresearchevidenceforpolicymakersandpractitioners.”(Tseng,2007,p.18)
Literature Cont.
1.Researchproducts*2.Capacity-buildingandsupport3.Events*4.Networks*5.Non-researchbasedproducts
Cooper(2014,p.46),inherstudyof44Canadianresearchbrokerageorganizations,whosemissionistomediatebetweenknowledgeproducersandknowledgeusers,sheidentifiedatleast5KMbstrategies(*morefrequentlyused):
Literature Review
Whilehavingthecapacitytostrengthenresearch-practicelinkageinhighereducationteachingandlearning,KMb asaframeworkfor facultydevelopment,atthistime,isaseverelyunderexploredarea ofdesignandresearch.
CTSI2016PEERMENTORINGQUALITATIVESTUDYFINDINGS(ISSOTL,2016)
TEACHINGCULTUREANDCLIMATE
(A)ISOLATION: Exacerbatedthroughthesehigh-stakesactivities• Tenureandpromotionguidelinesfor
teaching (e.g.,summative observationsofteaching)
• Courseevaluationdata
(B)ENABLINGPOSITIVETEACHINGCLIMATES&CULTURES:• Roleof“PlacesandSpaces”• Enhancedopportunitiesforteaching
conversationsatalllevelsTHEME
THEME
ISSOTL 2016: Next Steps
CTSI KNOWLEDGE MOBILIZATION STRATEGY:
● Fullreportreleasedtostakeholders,presentationtosenioradministration,communityroundtables/webinars,etc.
● Developmentofevidence-basedpracticalresources
● CTSItopilotevidence-basedmentoringforteachingprogram:Peer-to-Peer(P2P)MentoringforTeachingatUofT
Peer-2-Peer Faculty Mentoring for Teaching (P2P)
Description:CTSIPilot,Dec2016-May2017• Cohortof32UofT
instructors• Matched indyads(by
stream,campus,butcross-discipline)
• Focused onimprovingthequalityofcourse &studentlearningexperience
GOAL:toprovideasupportivespaceforinstructorstotrynewstrategies,approachesandbuildconfidenceintheirteachingthrougharangeofsupport
i
Programstructure/commitments:Attend3facilitatedcohortworkshopsandengageinregularpartnerinteractions• Recruitmentandpairing• Workshops• PeerObservation• Mid-coursefeedbackwithstudents• Regulardyadinteractions
4.Networks*
5.Non-researchbasedproducts
2.Capacity- BuildingandSupport:
3.Events*
KMb Approaches: P2P Pilot
Cooper, 2014, p. 46
1.Researchproducts*: MentoringforTeachingReport (CTSI,2016)
2Webinars;PeerMentor;NewResources(3guides,2tipsheets,andabook);CTSIstaffsupport;2externalfacilitatorsforWorkshop#1and “WhenMentoringmeetsCoaching”publishedresourcetext
3WorkshopsfacilitatedbyCTSIstaff
P2PCohort;otherUofTnetworksthatparticipantscouldconnectto
PromotionalMaterials
UofTExamples
Data Sources:Post-pilotSurvey• 23out32participants(72%)• 12mentor;11mentees
FocusGroups:• Menteegroups(5&4individuals)&
2mentorgroups(5&6individuals)• FacilitatedbyCTSIstaffnotinvolvedinpilot
Analysis:Post-pilotSurvey• Descriptivequantitativeandqualitative
analysis
FocusGroups:• Transcribedandcodedintoinitialcodesand
thenclusteredintocommonthemes(Denzin&Lincoln,2011;Glaser&Strauss,1967)
FINDINGS:5KeyFindingsthataddresspreviousresearchfindings:
1) Value of Relationships
2) Community-building (space and place to talk about teaching)
3) Resources to support teaching
development
4) Program Structure
(formalized)
5) Capacity-building and Influencing
Broader Culture
FINDINGS: 1) Value of Relationships
FINDINGS: 1) Value of Relationships
“Oneofthemosteye-openingthings…washowmuchwehaveincommon eventhoughweareindifferentdepartmentsanddifferentfacultiesaltogether”
“wewillcontinuetoworktogether.Ihopetoworkwithherinnewcoursedevelopmentthisyear.”
FINDINGS: 2) Community-building (space and place to talk about teaching)
Psychological “itgives yousomeonetotalktoandarelationshipwhereyoucanfeelcomfortabletryingnewthingsout.Soitwaskindofasafearea…”
“InoneofourSecondCupconversationsweweaskedeachother:“So,what’sthemostbrutal
teachingevaluationyou’vereceived?”
Physical
♡
FINDINGS: 2) Community-building (space and place to talk about teaching)
61.9% havemetsincetheendoftheprogram
81.82% plantomeetinthefuture
“We’dliketokeeptheconnectiongoingforward.”
“Weplantocontinuetomeetindefinitely!Webothteachonline,andhavebeenassistingoneanotherwithonlineteachingstrategiesandtechnology.”
“”
FINDINGS: 3) Resources to support teaching
development
FINDINGS:“Thiswasaddedon[Bluepulsetool],andwehadn’tanticipatedorplannedforit;alsoconcernedabouttheglitches…”
“Themostvaluablethingformewasthe…peerobservation.Thiscaused metolookatmyteachingstylefromadifferentperspectiveandIgainedalot…”
“It’sabitdisingenuous…topretendit’ssymmetricbecauseI’vebeenteachingfor24years…therewasalotofpressureinawaytocomeupwithnewthings”(mentor-coachmodel)
“Coffeechatisagoodwaytoestablishtrust…throughinformalchattingandarelaxedenvironmentoutofoffice”
3) Resources to support teaching
development
FINDINGS: 4) Program Structure
(formalized)
FINDINGS: 4) Program Structure
(formalized)
“Ithinktherewasarealadvantagetothefactthatwewereinaformalmentorshipprojectthatgaveitsomecredence”
“It was really good to have a framework”
“I was really happy that the workshops were focused and concrete”
“Loved it. Specifically, working with the mentor in an unscaffolded setting with the general context of encouraging high-quality learning and teaching.”
“Parts were interesting, but the parts where we were directed to communicate with our partner in a very specific way were awkward and felt inauthentic (workshop 1)”
FINDINGS: 5) Capacity-building and Influencing
Broader Culture✔ Pilotwithstronglong-termpossibilitiesandpotentialoutcomes
Iftherearefutureiterationsofthisprogramwouldyouwanttobeinvolvedagain?
81.82%(18/22)
‘YES’
✔ OverallSuccess
Iftherearefutureiterationsofthisprogramwouldyourecommendittoothers?
100%(22/22) ‘YES’
FINDINGS:
“Hopetousethisapproachtomentorinstructorsinmyowndepartment.Wasinterestedtolearnmoreaboutlistening– hashelpedinmyinteractionswithothers.”
“ProgramslikethisarevitaltodevelopingateachingcommunityatUofT.”
5) Capacity-building and Influencing
Broader Culture
CONCLUSIONSOurknowledgemobilizationeffortto:
1) REDUCEISOLATION:● Formativeopportunitiestovisiblyengageintraditionallyinvisiblehighstakes
activities(e.g.,observation,courseevaluation)withpeerssupportedcapacitybuildingandnetworkingatmultiplelevels
● Apositiveculturearoundteachingandlearningisbeingfosteredbypairsandcohort
2)ENABLINGPOSITIVETEACHINGCLIMATES&CULTURES● CTSI(TeachingCentre)servesasamediatorbetweenresearch/practice. (e.g.,
developmentofresources).Thiswasamajorfactorinrelativesuccessandadoption.● CTSImodelsandprovidesopportunities,places,andspaces fordevelopment.
4.Networks*
5.Non-researchbasedproducts
2.Capacity- BuildingandSupport:
3.Events*
KMb Approaches: P2P Pilot
Cooper, 2014, p. 46
1.Researchproducts*: MentoringforTeachingReport (CTSI,2016)
2Webinars;PeerMentor;NewResources(3guides,2tipsheets,andabook);CTSIstaffsupport;2externalfacilitatorsforWorkshop#1and“WhenMentoringmeetsCoaching”publishedresourcetext
3WorkshopsfacilitatedbyCTSIstaff
P2PCohort;otherUofTnetworksthatparticipantscouldconnectto
PromotionalMaterials
UofTExamplesTheattentiontointentionalKMbstrategiescancreatesynergyand
makeadirectlinkbetweenfindingsfromresearchand
demonstrate“howgeneratedknowledgewillbeputtouse,informpractice,oradvanceresearch.”(SSHRC,2016)
IMPLICATIONS• ConsiderationoftheroleofKMb
strategiesthatcanbeusedtonotonlydistributeknowledge,buttoalsohelpensuresuchknowledgeisaccessible,relevant,andused.
• ThepotentialforagreatermediationrolethatTeachingCentres couldplayinKMb
“Intermediaries(thirdpartyresearchbrokeringorganizationsthatconnectresearchproducersandusers)....andtheimpactthesethirdpartiesdoplay,couldplay,orshouldplayineducationalimprovementinitiatives” (Cooper,2014,p.182)
Contact:
P2PPilotReport:
http://teaching.utoronto.ca/teaching-support/fmt/p2p
Contact/Report
CarolRolheiser,MeganBurnett,GregoryHum,AndreaGraham&CoraMcCloy
THANK YOU