42A99NWM26 2.6099 COULSON010

MAUDE LAKE GOLD MINES LIMITED

EXPLORATION REPORT

FOR

COULSON CLAIM GROUP

COULSON TOWNSHIP

LARDER LAKE MINING DIVISION

RECEIVED

MAY 14 1985

MINING LANDS SECTION

R. A. Bennett, MSc., PEng May 7, 1985.

MAUDE LAKE 60LD MINES LIMITED

EXPLORATION REPORT - COULSON CLAIM GROUP

INTRODUCTION

Preliminary exploration work was completed over Maude Lake Gold Mines Ltd.'s COULSON GROUP of claims during the Fall and Winter of 1984. Gridding, magnetometer, radiometric, and two electromagnetic surveys were done to help characterize the underlying formations and locate potential target areas.

The property consists of 16 contiguous staked mining claims numbered: L. 737479 through L. 737482 inclusive 14 claims) L. 737493 through L. 737496 inclusive 14 claims] L. 787085 through L. 787092 inclusive (8 claims)

and are registered in the name of Maude lake Gold Mines Limited, 300 ElmStreet West, Sudbury, Ontario, P3C1V4.

The claims are located along the southwestern boundary of Coulson Township, Larder Lake Mining Division (NTS:42A9W), approximately 8 miles north-northeast of the Town of Matheson. Access to the GROUP is by Highway l O l east from Matheson to the Beatty-Carr Township boundary road, and then north, east, and north again along all-weather gravel town ship roads to within l miles of the claims. An old winter tractor trail extends to the center of the GROUP. The COULSON GROUP lies immediately north of Maude Lake's Main Group.

A property and general location plan is provided overleaf.

GENERAL 6EOL06Y l HISTORY

The general geology of Coulson Township is illustrated and briefly described on ODM Preliminary Map # PI57 by E. Leahy and R. Ginn, 1961. The prop erty has approximately 30* bedrock exposure and is shown to be underlain by a north-facing pile of Precambrian mafic lavas which are cut by a few north-trending Matachewan diabase dykes, and northeast striking Algoman porphyry dykes. An old pit is shown on PI 57, and a few more were located during the course of the exploration work.

The only previous exploration on record for the property is that completed by Maude Lake during 1982 on the 4 southwestern-most claims. This work included geological mapping, magnetic and VLF-EM surveys.

Scale 250,000

It ©l[44346

"v*r . T1 v "i* v * vt* 0 1* 0 * 9 ?* 6 "fr 0 1 1? 6"

u

| 801695r; - -

804694

.10Scale: r- 1/2mile

L li

l604700 i 604701l""" "T

l 804715 i 804716

604714 - 804717——— f

804713

MAUDE LAKE G OLD MINES LIMITED

PROPERTY Se LOCATON PLAN

couLSon CLflirn GROUP

Coulson Twp., Larder Lake Mining Div. May?. 1985

MAUDE LAKE 60LO MINES LIMITED page 2.

EXPLORATION WORK

A grid of picket lines totalling 13.5 miles and 2.0 miles of baseline was cut over the GROUP during October and November 1984 by Maude Lake personnel. The baseline strikes east-west and follows the Beatty-Coulson Township boundary. The picket lines strike due north and are spaced at 400 foot intervals. Pickets were chained and set every 100 feet along all the cut lines. A Base Station was established at 24W on the Baseline for geophysical survey tie-in purposes.

MAGNETOMETER SURVEY

A magnetometer survey was completed over the claims by W. Fuller during November 1984 using a Sharpe Intruments MF-1 Fluxgate Magnetometer. Readings were taken every 100 feet along all the cut lines for a total of 702. Daily magnetic readings were tied to the base station and corrected for diurnal drift. In addition, secondary base stations along the baseline at each line were re-read as each loop was completed. All the readings were adjusted to correspond to those magnetic results on the adjoining Main Group.

The results of the magnetometer survey are plotted on Map COM-002 that accompanies this report. Diurnal variations were a maximum of 120 gammas for any given day and 200 gammas for the entire survey. A summary of the MF-1 specifications and operation procedures is appended.

The range of magnetic susceptibilities for the claim GROUP fall between -4000 and +2950 gammas, with the average background being 780 gammas. Three north-striking magnetic highs along lines O, 8W, and 48W are interpreted to be caused by diabase dykes. A diabase dyke was seen in outcrop at Line O on the baseline. Two other north-trending features on Lines 20W and 44E may also be due to diabase.

The several narrow, sharp westerly-trending magnetic highs that parallel the volcanic stratigraphy could be caused by concentrations of magnetic oxides or sulphides within the flows or along flow tops. Most of these anomalies occur over or near outcrop. The broad, flat magnetic trends in the western, north-central, and eastern portions of the GROUP occur over low, swampy areas and likely reflect more the depth of overburden than the underlying geology.

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

MAUDE LAKE 60LD MINES LIMITED page 3.

ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEYS

Two VLF-Electromagnetic surveys were completed over the claims during November and December 1984 by W. Fuller and N. Bussolaro. The Phoenix VLF-2 EM Unit was used and readings were taken every 100 feet along all the grid lines. At each station, the dip angle, the phase angle, and the field strength were measured. The first station (FI J used was that a Cutler, Maine [24.0 KHz] to test for easterly striking structures and/or conductive zones. The Cutler station was usually read on Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday. The second station [F2l used was that at Annapolis, Maryland (21.8 KHz] to test for northerly striking structures and/or conductive zones. The Annapolis station was usually read on Friday, Saturday, and Monday. The claims were traversed separately for each survey. All the dip angles are plotted at l "-40 degrees. The field strength readings were tied into the base station on a daily basis.

The results of the two electromagnetic surveys are plotted on: for FI - Map "COV-003 - Cutler, Maine (24.0 KHz] for F2 - Map 'COV-004 - Annapolis, My 121.8 KHz]

that accompany this report. For each survey, 702 stations were read. Asummary of the VLF-2's specifications is appended.

The cross-over anomalies have been categorized into two groups; those having high field strengths, and those with low field strengths. As a general rule of thumb for interpreting VLF-EM data, high field strength cross-over anomalies usually reflect bedrock features whereas low field strength anomalies typically are caused by overburden contrasts.

Map # COV-003For the FI survey, several strong VLF-EM anomalies were found. Anomaly l traverses half the property and corresponds directly with a rusty shear zone found in outcrop on Line 16W. Anomaly 2 parallels anomaly l and likely has a similar cause. Anomalies la and 2a, although seeming as strike extensions, both have low field strengths, fall along drainages, and are interpreted to be caused by overburden contrasts. Anomalies 3,4 and 5 all strike northwesterly, approximating the strike of the volcanic stratigraphy. These are interpreted to be caused by sheared and/or mineralized flow top breccias. Anomaly 4 is associated with a coincident mag high and may be caused by pyrrhotite-rich flow tops. The four single-line cross-overs all fall in overburden areas and their causes are unknown.

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

MAUDE LAKE 60LD MINES LIMITED pige 4.

Map * COV-004For the F2 station, only one 2 line cross-over and several isolated single-line anomalies were found. Anomaly 6 strikes northwesterly and may be due to sheared flow top breccia. The single-line cross-over at 24W, 7N falls along anomaly l and reflects the shear zone. The remaining single-line cross overs have unknown causes.

RADIOMETRIC SURVEY

A radiometric survey was completed over the GROUP during November 1984 to assist the eventual geological interpretation and to test for potassium-rich felsic intrusions and/or alteration zones that can be associated with gold mineralization events. A McPhar TV-1A Radiation Spectrometer was used and the total field readings were taken every 100 feet along ail the grid lines. In all, 704 readings were taken. All the readings were tied into the base station and corrected for diurnal drift using the time-linear method. The general topography and outcrop areas were also charted. A summary of the TV-1 A's specifications is appended.

The total field readings ranged from l to 14 counts per minute for the sur vey area iMap "COV-0051. These can be grouped into distinct populations based on the surface conditions. Low, wet areas having alder and spruce swamps, or open beaver ponds always had the lowest readings [ l to 3 cpm ]. Areas of outcrop returned readings between 4 and 8 cpm. The highest readings [ 8 - H cpm j always fell over areas with poplar bush where the lacustrine clay deposits are closest to the surface. One potassium- enriched outcrop area at 40E, 5N was found and should be investigated further.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Preliminary exploration work that included magnetic, radiometric, and two electromagnetic surveys was completed over Maude Lake Gold Mines' COULSON GROUP of claims in southwestern Coulson Township. The results have better defined the geophysical character of the underlying geology and outlined specific target areas that should be further investigated by detailed prospecting and geological mapping.

l l

Matheson, Ontario R.A. BenrettrMSc., PEng. 4 maps, 3 appendices May 7, 1985.

l l l l l l l lriiiiiiiiii

APPE

ND

IX

MF

'-l M

AG

NETO

METER

S" cr

is

""

•o

Ss'B

O

-g

•i ~*03*C

O

o

o

o

^i

*C

5s

'a n

" iO

c

CD r:

O

cj

E

o5f

S

B G

so

oSoa.

OoCO

oE

•u M

. .H

-

•o

oC)

c

o

E

ra

oO)

' o

j 2-

Era

-i

l^

"

gS

S S

CO

3

—

2 s

o

S

.HC

O

~

I(A

O

•o

o

Ec: uc

o

eCO

o

•a

i -sra

~-

rao

-S

oco

-oco

o

v- "TO

i i

5

to

^

ora

*S

* 3

23

l i

s lsi

5

GO

g

Q*-

Ss stZ

s-

i i

s -

2

~

S35

g

S

i i g

i l

o.

o

CO

^

^

ra S

t

Jo

o

O

CO

o

oQ.

O

"

6-*

•-s:3=

0

"ra o

M

^

V

i o

Q.

ESO

r;

c^ ^

*oE

S

H

5

E

c

S

E

E

H*^

*TT

er

.-3 I-S

CC

t3

C

J

Ci

GC

o

CD cr. o o

O

CJ5 C

D

Ci

Oo

o o

o o

" ~

*

X

DESCRIPTION OF FLUXGATE MAGNETOMETER MODEL 37 F-J.

ra i f j ii*W' 1. :,,\ ^ t a- w

FIGURE A1

2

FIGURE B1

2

3

RANGE SWITCH

METER SCALE

indicating gamma values in ranges of 100 K, 30 K, 10 K, 3000, 1000.upper scale indicating 0-1000l50 divisions)

~ lower scale indicating 0-3000 (GO divisions) red arc for battery check

3 MAIN SWITCH — showing the following steps:OFF Battery check

CIRCULAR LEVH

for roup,h levelling the instrument

LATITUDEADJUSTMENTSWITCHLATITUDE ADJUSTMENTBATTEItY CAliLE AND CONNECTORBATTERY PACK

in steps

fine

For transportation instrument

attachable to

E. J. SHARPE INSTRUMENTS OF CANADA LTD.

P.O. Cox 279, Y/illowilalc, Ontario

npn.'Yrr\ IK) CANADA

MODEL MF-1 FLUXGATE MAGNETOMETERJpcrotion of the Motor1.) Remove all magnetic objects from operator's person, e.g. keys, coins, buttons, etc,

Zippers should be non-magnetic.2.) Connect Battery Cable, Figure 6, to magnetometer receptacle on bottom of main hous

ing. This connection must be secured by lock-ring. A User, oattery pack (Fig. 5) either in back pocket or on belt behind operator. Switch on Main Switch (Fig. 3) to first position, which is the battery check. Indicating rr.eter needle should rest within red arc. Replace batteries if reading below red arc.

i. i L.n;itude Adjustment -To adjust the latitude setting toread O gammas is a simple operation.j. After indicating meter needle (fig.2) shows voltage okay, switch Main Switch(Fig.S)

•.c next position which is the positive reading with the Range Switch (Fig. 1) set at :he '.OOK step. (100,000 gamma range)

."'.If needle goes full arc to left past O, switch main switch (Fig. 3) to last position which is the negative reading range.

c. Figures 10 and 9 indicate the latitude adjustment controls - Coarse control is Fig. 1C and Fine control is Fig. 9. If scale reading is more than t 7 ,000 gammas rotate :oarse control (Fig. 10) in steps of 7,000 and switch range down to more sensitive .•ange until scale is reading less than i 7,000 gammas. Remove protection cap on rine control (Fig. 8) by pulling straight off. Then rotate fine control switch (Fig. 9) cr.til scale reading is O gammas. Check reading by switching main switch from positive to negative (or vice versa) to ensure O reading both polarities. Replace fine control protection cap.

6.) Calibration - This meter is calibrated at the factory prior to delivery. Field tests show that only by severe misuse (i.e. constant dropping, rough handling, improper shipping) can the calibration of this instrument be effected. It is therefore not necessary to re calibrate in the field and if through misuse calibration becomes necessary, the meter should be returned to the factory. *AII parts are guaranteed against defect for a period of one year and will be replaced free of charge.

"This guarantee does not apply to batteries or the connecting cable.7.) Trouble Shooting - Under normal conditions the only field problem will be batteries or

the connecting cable. If after completion of step (4) under "Operation of the Meter" !he meter still does not indicate voltage, check cable for faulty connection or broken cable. If after this procedure, meter still does not indicate current, return unit immedi ately to your supplier or directly to the factory.

Regional Latitude SettingsNormally each unit is pre-set at the factory for the Northern Hemisphere. However, if the uni: is required for Equatorial or Southern Hemispheric regions, the unit will be pre-set at the :actory for these areas. If a unit is going from one of the above regions to another, re;,; instructions will be supplied on request. Field Procedure!,'; .-c-is c; Base Control station. This station should be selected in relation to one or

..•:th ot two things.\. G eneral magnetic background (i.e. not anomalous) if possible. 2. Accessibility in relation to area being surveyed.

2.) Se: !i:.g,ietometer toread between O and 200 gammas. (For contouring and to avoid small negative readings, an arbitrary value of I000-800gammas should be added to all readings.

3.) For elective diurnal control, control stations should be permanently marked and read*•t-s should be taken at the same height and location each time; a simple method is to ..ve the control stations' pickets hammered into the ground with the top about waist

::i,ght. Rest the probe end of the magnetometer on the top of the picket. In barren country,a mound or large piece of rock or some other material should be used.

4.) Continue survey the same as any other method of magnetic surveying.5.) Remove and replace Silica-Gel (Fig.7) when deteriorated. The silica gel is located

in the removable probe housing.The Silica bag should not be placed on the bottom of the probe housing.

D ' De not pass powerful magnet closer than l foot to instrument. l d uring winter operation, batteries should be kept in pocket or under parka. •""iVarning: - Do not leave batteries in battery case when'unit is being stored. Always be

:,e sure meter is turned off after use. Disconnect battery cable when meter not in use.

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

APPENDIX 2

Electromagnetic Unit

Lightweight, low battery drain, rugged, simple to operate

Two independent channels

Each channel may select any station between 14.0 and 29.9 kHz

Single crystal used for all frequencies

Locking clinometer provides tilt-angle memory

Superheterodyne detection and digital filtering provide extremely high selectivity and noise rejection

Military and time standard VLF transmitters are distributed over the world. These stations are used for geophysical EM surveying thus eliminating the need for a local trans mitter and permitting one-man operation.

To ensure that a station excites the prospec tive conductor, two stations at approximately right angles are used during o survey (see data on back).

The choice of 160 frequencies in the range 14.0 to 29.9 kHz permits the use of a local EM trans mitter when no suitable regular VLF station is available.

PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LIMITEDGeophysical Consulting and Contracting, Instrument Manufacture, Sale and Lease.

Head Office: 200 Yorkland Blvd. Wlllowdale, Ont., Canada M2J 1R5. Tel: (416) 493-6350310-885 Dunsmuir St. Vancouver, B.C., Canada V6C 1N5. Teh (604) 684-2285 4690 Ironton St. Denver, Colorado, U.S.A. 80239. Tel: (303) 373-0332

Specifications

'

ParamelflkMeasured

Frequency Selection, Front Panel

l Frequency Selection, Internal

Detection And Filtering

I Orientation and magnitude of the major and minor axes of the ellipse of polarization.

: Dual channel, front panel selectable (FI or F2) each with Independent precision 10-turn dial gain control.

: FI and F2 can be selected by internal switches within the range 14.0 to 29.9 kHz In 100 Hz Increments.

: Superheterodyne detection and digital filtering provide o much narrower bandwidth and thus greater rejection of Interfering stations and 60 cycle noise than conventional

All of the established stations may be (elected, or alternatively, a local VLF transmitter may be used which transmits at any frequency in the range 14.0 to 29.9 kHz.

• Meter Display

• Audio

Clinometer

—1 Batteryg}

Temperature RangeH1 Dimensions

Weight

Field Data

receivers.

: 2 ranges: 0 to 300 or 0 to 1000. Background is typically set at100, Meter is also used as dip angle null indicator and batterytest.

: Crystal speaker. 2500 Hz used os null indicator.

: +90", +0.50 resolution. Normal locking, push buttonrelease.

: One standard 9v transistor radio battery. Average lifeexpectancy - 1 to 3 months (battery drain is 3 mA)

S -40" to + 60 0 C.

: 8 x 22 x 14 cm (3 x 9 x 6 inches).

: 850 grams (1.9 pounds).

VLF Station Frequency

Bordeaux, FranceOdessa (Block Sea)Rugby, U.K.Moscow, U.S.S.R.Yosomoi, JapanHegalond, NorwayCutler, MaineSeattle, WashingtonMalabor, JavaOxford, U.K.Paris, FranceAnnapolis, MarylandNorthwest Cape, AustraliaLouluolel, HawaiiBuenos Aires, ArgentinaRome, Italy

(kHz)

15.115.616.017.117.417.617.818.619.019.620.721.422.323.423.627.2

l l l l l l l l l l

The results below illustrate the need for using two orthogonal stations when the strike of the prospective conductor is not well-known. The dip angle and amplitude data measured using station NLK in Seattle, Washington, show only a very weak anomaly associated with the two conductive sulphide zones at Cavendish, Ontario.

The results obtained using Cutler, Maine reveal a more prominent anomaly, but the best response was obtained using Annapolis, Maryland since the station lies almost due south and the transmitted electromagnetic field is thus maximum-coupled with the North-South trending conductors.

JO'

10-

oir

•so".140'

ItO-

Z20'

210-

200'

190'

HO

170-

HO-

ISO-

140-

150-

120-

110'

100'

PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LIMITEDVLF-RADIO EM SYSTEM LINE C CAVENDISH TEST AREA

——— 0WE8T O IPi0EAST DIP

0 NORTH DIPjQsOUTH DIP

Station MSS Annopolit, Md

Station NAA Cutlir, Moini

Station NIK Stott!*, Winnington

APPENDIX 5

McPHAR TV-1A Radiation Spectrometer

A 3-channel instrument for reconnaisance use

Both meter and audio reading

Four count scales

Trigger on-off switch

Functional pistol design

Lightweight

Model TV-1 A is a three channel, integral type radiation spectrometer. Measure ments are based on the spectral characteristics of gamma radiation from radioactive elements. Selection of the operating threshold is made by means of the threshold selector switch.

The instrument is designed primarily for reconnaissance. The total count position provides for maximum sensitivity. Addi tional thresholds however, provide the

capability to differentiate between gamma radiations emanating from daughter elements of uranium and thorium and provide quantitative Infor mation relating to each.

The meter is calibrated to display zero to 100 counts per minute. A four position scale multiplier switch provides four full scale ranges of 100,1,000,10,000 and 100,000 counts per minute. A fifth position on this switch is employed to

test the condition of the batteries.The variable time constants are tied in with the threshold selector switch. In the total count (maximum sensitivity) posi tion, a fast or slow time constant may be selected. In the upper thresholds (lower net count), the long time constant only, is in effect.The detecting element is a 1V4 by V/z inch sodium iodide crystal coupled to a photomultiplier tube. These are hermet-

Field use is convenient with leather holster

l l l l l

ically sealed, magnetically shielded and mounted in the forward end of the scintillometer housing. A speaker provides a variable pitch

output with changing radiation levels. A speaker control, mounted on the top of the instrument, can be used to adjust the pitch for any given level of radiation.

TV-1 A spectrometer comes complete with a leather holster, thorium calibrating source and a foam fitted attache case.

Specifications •~Measurement Ranges: Four switch positions provide full scale counts per 10Mminute of 1 00, 1 ,000, 1 0,000 and 1 00,000.

•00

Time Constant: Threshold Ti: 1 and 10 J seconds. Thresholds T2 and T} : I 10 seconds. t , coSpeaker: Variable pitch output governed * *o by radiation intensity.Temperature Range: -35 degrees to -f 55 degrees C. 't

••^•V

V i \

^ \ f\ 1\

—— M

\r

:X\y

X"\

Tt"t

\

/N

W

A — '-i—•- -V ^r/'V \ \

\\

- WM4M ...,.

- *0

'j

ttHVM

1 ,,A-\

— .

Detector Crystal: Nal (T) W" x 1V4" (43 cu. cm.) and matched photo-multiplier hermetically sealed.Battery Supply: Two "C" size flashlight cells located in handle. On-off control by either trigger or slide switch.

Gtrnnl Aiy I

H 10lv

NrvfllOrno'TIMli

Voltage Regulation: Internally generated high and low voltages are highly regu lated down to Vi i nitial battery voltage.Accessories: Leather belt holster,

thorium calibrating source, spare batteries, instruction manual, foam fitted attache case.Weight: 3 pounds.

McPhar Instrument Corporation Head Office:55 Tempo AvenueWillowdale, Ontario, Canada M2H 2R9 Tel: {416) 497-1700 Telex: 0623541 Cable: McPHAR TOR

Sales agents In:Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North 6\ South America

Contact McPhar Instrument Corp. head office for the agent in your area.

42Ae9NWM26 2 .8099 COULSON

Mining Lands Section

Control Sheet

900

File No

TYPE OF SURVEY

MINING LANDS COMMENTS:

GEOPHYSICAL

GEOLOGICAL

GEOCHEMICAL

EXPENDITURE

Signature of Assessor

Date

Minis|iatu

* Resources

Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)

The Mining Act

Instructions: — Please type or print.- If number of mining claims traversed

exceeds space on this form, attach a list.Note: — Only days credits calculated in the

"Expenditures" section may be enteredin the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.

- Do not use shaded areas below.

.- *** s,Township or Area

(JlF-t**,Prospector's Licence No.

T u eiClaim Holder(s)

Address

Survey Company

Name and Address of Author (of Geo-TechnicaTreport)

' | Date of Survi

___________i Day l Mo. l

y (from fit to)

Yr. j Day | Mo. | Yr.

^2 2 - 76?Z.

Total MllM of line Cut

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

2mM/-^Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

2020AO10

Days per Claim

Days per Claim

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed

Performed on Claim(s)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Date Recorded Holder or

Certification Verifying Report of Work

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying

8.6.4 s ire- 57 A** i O*vr.Certified Cert/fi/d by (Sigp*ture)

W,

1362 (81/9)

REGISTERED

May 7, 1985 Report of Work

Maude Lake Gold Mines United 300 Elm Street West Sudbury* Ontario P3C 1V4

Dear S1n

RE: Mining Claims L 737479, et al, In the Township of Coulson

I have not received the reports and maps (In duplicate) for the Electromagnetic, Magnetometer and Radiometric Survey on the above-mentioned claims.

As the assessment "Report of Work11 was recorded bythe Mining Recorder on March 18, 1985, the 60 day period allowedby Section 77 of the Mining Act for the submissionof the technical reports and maps to this officewill expire on May 17, 1985.

If the material 1s not submitted to this office by May 17, 1985, I will have no alternative but to Instruct the Mining Recorder to delete the work credits from the claim record sheets.

For further Information, please contact Mr. Arthur Barr at (416)965-4888.

Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-4888

A. Barntoc

cc: Mining RecorderKirkland Lake, Ontario

End,

cc: R.A. Bennett R.R.I4Site 37, Box l Sudbury, Ontario P3E 4M9

Ontario

Ministry of Natural ResourcesGEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL

TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey(s) Township or Art-a

Claim Holder(s)

Magnetometer, VLF EM, VLF EM, Radiometric

nnm.SDN TOWNSHIP

Maude lake Gold Mines Ltd300 Elm St. West, Sudbury, Ont

Survey Company R.A. Bennett. Consulting GeologiiAuthor of Report R. A. Bennett, PEncj.Address of Author RR4. Site 37. Box l, Subury, OntCovering Dates of Survey Pot 3, 1984 to Dec 15, 1984

{(incoming to office) Total Miles of Line Cut 1S. R m -i

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED Geophysical

-Electromagnetic^^. ENTER 40 days (includes * ^^line cutting) for first -Magnetometer^^, survey. —Radiometric——g^. ENTER 20 days for eaclnd VLF -Other——————g^. additional survey using Geological——-—-. same grid.

DAYS per claim

Geochemical.AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special proviiion credit* do not apply to airborne surveys)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter days per claim)

^f Author of Report or Agent

Res. Geol.. .QualificationsPrevious Surveys

File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

L. 737479

• •**************4t****tt**tt***t* *i*A? li*]L*t*V**t*************

737495

737596

t******************4* o* f* v (P& •

787086

787088

787089

787090

787091ti

787092

l

TOTAL CLAIMS

837 (6/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations———— f (J c.——————————————————Number of Readings ——. Station interval ' ——————100 feet________Lme spacing______400 feet Profile scale______l" c /fO degrees_________________________

Contour interval _____100 gammas_____^_______^___^__________

Instrument ————SHARPE MF-1 Fluxgate Magnetometer———————————Accuracy - Scale constant 5 gammas———-—---————————————————.

C Diurnal correction method Time Linear___________________________ l . Base Station check-in interval (h™.™) ''4 hours f to 6 flOUTS - ___________

s

w

i—

Base Station location and value Line 2k W On the Baseline.-————-———————-

Instrument Phoenix VLF-EM Unit 2_____________________________

Coil configuration —————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Coil separation ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Accuracy ———————————————————————————————————————————————————-.———— Method: ffl Fixed transmitter D Shoot back O In line D Parallel line

Survey 1=24.0 KHz, Cutler Ma. Survey 2s.21.6 KHz, Annapolis My.(specify V.L. F. nation)

ParametersmMMirprf Dip angle, Phase angle. Field Strength.

Instrument.Scale constant

Corrections made.

^ Base station value and location.

Elevation accuracy.

Instrument ————Method D Time Domain D Frequency Domain

Parameters - On time _________________________ Frequency ————-Off time__________________________ Range ———————

— Delay time ________________________

— Integration time.Power.G Ci

^ Electrode array.

Electrode spacing . Type of electrode

SELF POTENTIAL

Instrument

Survey Method

Cnrrertinns made

Rang*

RADIOMETRIC

Instrument———-Values measured.

McPhar TV-1A Radiation SpectrometerTotal Field Readings

Energy windows (levels) Height of instrument—Size of detector____XOverburden Pond,'swamp, Poplar bush, and Outcrop

Background Count. 7 cpm

by ^-j- inches

(type, depth - include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)

Type of survey————————————————————————— Instrument —————————————————————————Accuracy———-————-—————————-—...—————.Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS

Type of survey(s) ———— Instrument(s) —————

Accuracy————^—^(specify for each type of survey)

(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraft used.Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude.Miles flown over total area.

.Line Sparing

.Over claims only-

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection————————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth———— Terrain————————

Drainage Development———————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent

p.p. m. p. p. b.

D D

Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)

Others________________________Field Analysis (.

Extraction Method. Analytical Method. Reagents Used——

Field Laboratory Analysis No.(——————^——

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, icreening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis————

Extraction Method. Analytical Method . Reagents Used ——

Commercial Laboratory (. Name of Laboratory,— Extraction Method—— Analytical Method —— Reagents Used -————

.tests)

.tests)

.tests)

GeneraL General.

r-

\

\ \

\ \ V

\

V\\ \ V

\\

\ \

V

\ \ x \

\ x

\ x

\X O

i

x

\ \

.

0 Vi g

in*OD s O)

OJ (Mi 0 o

ou*-l

UJ 00

UJ N

UJo(VJ

UJ*(MJ

UlOD M

Ul Nro

kiV rt

Ul Ul Id

S?UJ Mm

TQ: Q:

I-

o: ir< o UJ

CD

SYMBOLS

OUTCROP { SWAMP

————TRAIL m BASE STATION

INSTRUMENT:

Contour Interva

SHARPE MF lFLUXGATE MAGNETOMETER

100 gammas

24 N

20 N

(6N

I2N

8N

4N

il

TR UE

00 BASELINECOULSON TWR HATTY TWR"

MAUDE LAKE GOLD MINES LIMITED

MAGNETOMETERSURVEY

COULSON CLAIM GROUP - COULSON TWR

Scale- l inch - 40O feet

DECEMBER 1984 MAP No.COM-002

•?2A09NWe426 2.8099 COULSON 200

in*OD

* O

*

SMK)

CDC\J

*•* CJ

Ofsj (M 00 O

O

til Ulto

Ul (M

UJ (D

UlO (M

U Ul K) (M

Ul (M

Ul ID f*

Ul Id9

u

4ZW

CL

I-

LU

T

v \

y/' i^

Q: Q:

H

a: a:< o UJ

CD

/

7

"•737482\

-

'74;IE

v 7i

x

i* e

7

t;i' "j"

2.3 E \

31*

Ip

l-rw

lt**l

J737493/

V.(f —

l*re

\. *737494\- N ^

7lie

176ais

\ l 7 7

JouJ

/'x

737496

"737s7

7

Z.oW

O

o

o

o

o

i

Z1W

UW

10 Ul

lit*/

tlM

2*

k.

787085

l*/

J587086

li,-J

O

U

d

O

Bat* Station

rt

SYMBOLS

OUTCROP i SWAMP

————TRAIL H BASE STATION

A

INSTRUMENT: Pheonix VLF-2 EM Unit

STATION : Annapolis, Maryland (21.4KHz)

DIP ANGLE SCALE: l inch = 40 degrees

O

Cross -over Anomaly, High Field Strength " " " Low "

24 N

2O N

t6N

I2N

8N

4N

if

TR UE

00 BASELINE

COULSON TWP

"iiATTY TWR

MAUDE LAKE GOLD MINES LIMITED

VLF-EM SURVEY

COULSON CLAIM GROUP - COULSON TWR

Scale- l inch - 4OO feet

DECEMBER 1984 MAP No.COV-004

42A89NW8426 2.8099 COULSON 210

H)

N

Q

S

X)

i

CAR

R

TWP

BE

ATT

Y

TWR

MM

BM

aJ

WIL

KIE

T

WR

CD

H

W

O

~ L S2

W

L 46

W

U44

W

L4O

W

L 36

W

L 32

W

L 28

W

L 24

W

LOT

12

LOTH

LOT

II

LOT

10

O)

H

o

O

CD"*

O

* O

vi

i o

O

C/)

^

2>

H

" i

i m z H

L 2O

W

L (6

W

taw

MX.

—

*

T

- *

rf

l O

^s.

*"

^

fi

H

T'5

' "*

^lX

* ^

s. fc

/tS

X

l-A

-SA

*^|

3 -x

A, A-

/V^

s \;

il v

TL

4W

oo JUBL

6 i

l^/

fi /.^

^ ^

*5 -

5:i

*.

Jt i

*.

*-

X /\

0

O

C.

O

O

Q

Llt

C

LW

E

ill?

Y;

\- y

r i L

o^X

i- t

/N

//^

r- i

? 0

\SA

^ a

*\a

S

? JT

i0

/y

-j

*- -w.

\jri -

^ *-

*- ^

t t/*

^.\

M

x /3

\0 V

C

*

*-

\

-*-

^L

2OC

O r

m

s O

- O

r l

s fo. V

)

O) o m Z

o5*

5.

o —

*

2

O

9.

"D rr i

(D

(Ob

m

x S

x N c

i

•n i m O

) ci

m

LOT

H?

tW f

t *- L

** z

s i

i o*

--*'*

w-

* j;

ra

z

E t

* t

~ t

x*

i ^

^~

; /

f. S

l li?

iK

/A

^i

- K

?*

t t

* s/

y -^

1

—v

xV 2

* ^?

-;

I ?

i i j

e- i

i

i.

9^

Jtv

l

no

28

H r

H'

H

TQ:

o: cr< o UJ

CD

SYMBOLS

OUTCROP v SWAMP

———TRAIL B BASE STATION

INSTRUMENT:

READINGS:

Me PHAR TV- IA RADIATION SPECTROMETER

Total counts per minute

24 N

20 N

16 N

UE

I2N

8N

4N

00 BASELINECOULSON TWP HATTY TWP"

MAUDE LAKE GOLD MINES LIMITED

RADIOMETRICSURVEY

COULSON CLAIM GROUP- COULSON TWR

l inch - 4OO feet

DECEMBER 1984 MAPNo.COR-005

42A39NW0426 2.8899 COULSON 230