exploring gender differentials in adoption of sustainable intensification practices in northern...

1
to obtain more information about Africa RISING Scan Me Findings Conclusions 1. Rates of adoption Figure 2: Adopted SIPs by gender Figure 3: Eect of SIPs on maize yield(kg/ha). Figure 4: Eect of SIPs on net income(GHC/ha). The gender of the plot manager does not aect the adoption of SIPs. The adoption of SIPs diers across female farmers in both male and female headed- headed households respectively. The adoption of SIPs depends on access to essential resources such as labour, land, livestock, and other factors. The adoption of the combined SIPs had the greatest benets in general. The adoption of improved maize had the greatest impact on maize yields. However, the adoption is associated with the use of more inorganic fertilizers, which are very expensive to most small-scale farmers. Reference Pretty,J.,Toulman, C&Willams,S.(2011). Sustainable intensication in African agriculture. Int.Jour of Agricultural Sustainability. 26 31 16 16 40 38 18 15 95 -14 77 51 -16 68 Improved maize increased yield by 95%, CSD decreased yield by 14%, and improved maize with CSD increased yield by 77%. Improved maize increased net income by 51%, CSD decreased net income by 16%, and improved maize with CSD increased net income by 68%. Mr. John Baanaah, a farmer in northern Ghana shows ohis maize harvested.Credit:IITA/Jonathan Odhons Women contribute greatly towards most farming activities and family food security in Africa. Nevertherless, they are confronted with many challenges such as low productivity, lack of institutional supports, low farm incomes, lack of access to credit, and family burdens including domestic chores. Sustainable Intensication (SI) of smallholder agriculture systems can help address the contraints of low productivity and low farm incomes. SI involves the application of multiple inputs and practices in an integrated manner to increase productivity while increasing contributions to natural capital and environmental services (Pretty et al., 2011). To explore the gender dierentials in the adoption of Sustainable Intensication Practices (SIPs), To determine the impact of SIPs on maize yields and net income. A total of 468 farmers were randomly selected from 16 Africa RISING intervention communities for the survey (Figure 1). Farmers were interviewed with a structured questionnaire. The questions were centered on areas such as crop production, marketing and transportation, etc. Three SIPs were considered in this study: improved maize, cropping system diversication(CSD), and the combination of the two SIPs. A mixed multinomial endogenous treatment eects model was used to explore the adoption of SIPs as well as extimate the impact of SIPs on maize yields and net income. The model was estimated using a Maximum Simulated Likelihood (MSL) approach. 2. Adoption patterns of SIPs Using non-adoption as a reference category. The model estimates show that; The gender of the plot manager does not inuence the adoption of the SIPs. Female farmers in female-headed households are less likely to adopt improved maize and CSD, whiles their counterparts in male-headed households are more likely to adopt CSD. Factors that aect adoption and impact of SIPs include household size, land tenure, livestock ownership, educational level, farmer's age, group membership, improved seeds, number of traders the household knows, plot distance, soil characteristics, agro-ecological zone, and source of information on SIPs. 2.1. Average treatment eects of SIPs Figure1: Africa RISING intervention communities in northern Ghana Exploring Gender Dierentials in Adoption of Sustainable Intensication Practices in Northern Ghana Shaibu Mellon Bedi 1* , Bekele Hundie Kotu 2 ,Cornelis Gardebroek 1 ,Stephen Frimpong 2 1 Wageningen University and Research Center, The Netherlands 2 International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ghana *Corresponding author email: [email protected] Acknowledgement This research publication was made possible with support from United State Agency for International development (USAID) through the Africa Research In Sustainable Intensication for the Next Generation (Africa RISING) program as part of the US Government's Feed the Future Initiative. Introduction Research Objectives Material and Methods

Upload: africa-rising

Post on 14-Apr-2017

52 views

Category:

Science


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Exploring gender differentials in adoption of sustainable intensification practices in northern Ghana

to obtain more information

about Africa RISING

Scan Me

Findings

Conclusions

1. Rates of adoption

Figure 2: Adopted SIPs by gender

Figure 3: Effect of SIPs on maize yield(kg/ha). Figure 4: Effect of SIPs on net income(GHC/ha).

The gender of the plot manager does not affect the adoption of SIPs.

The adoption of SIPs differs across female farmers in both male and female headed-

headed households respectively.

The adoption of SIPs depends on access to essential resources such as labour, land,

livestock, and other factors.

The adoption of the combined SIPs had the greatest benefits in general.

The adoption of improved maize had the greatest impact on maize yields. However,

the adoption is associated with the use of more inorganic fertilizers, which are very

expensive to most small-scale farmers.

ReferencePretty,J.,Toulman, C&Willams,S.(2011). Sustainable

intensification in African agriculture. Int.Jour of Agricultural

Sustainability.

26

31

16 16

4038

1815

95

-14

7751

-16

68

Improved maize increased yield by 95%, CSD decreased

yield by 14%, and improved maize with CSD increased

yield by 77%.

Improved maize increased net income by 51%, CSD decreased net income by 16%, and improved maize with CSD increased net income by 68%.

Mr. John Baanaah, a farmer in northern Ghana shows off hismaize harvested.Credit:IITA/Jonathan Odhons

Women contribute greatly towards most farming activities and family food

security in Africa. Nevertherless, they are confronted with many challenges

such as low productivity, lack of institutional supports, low farm incomes,

lack of access to credit, and family burdens including domestic chores.

Sustainable Intensification (SI) of smallholder agriculture systems can help

address the contraints of low productivity and low farm incomes.

SI involves the application of multiple inputs and practices in an integrated

manner to increase productivity while increasing contributions to natural

capital and environmental services (Pretty et al., 2011).

To explore the gender differentials in the adoption of Sustainable Intensification Practices (SIPs), To determine the impact of SIPs on maize yields and net income.

A total of 468 farmers were randomly selected from 16

Africa RISING intervention

communities for the survey (Figure 1). Farmers were interviewed with a

structured questionnaire.

The questions were centered on areas such as crop production,

marketing and transportation, etc.

Three SIPs were considered in this study: improved maize, cropping system

diversification(CSD), and the combination of the two SIPs.

A mixed multinomial endogenous treatment effects model was used to

explore the adoption of SIPs as well as extimate the impact of SIPs on maize

yields and net income. The model was estimated using a Maximum Simulated

Likelihood (MSL) approach.

2. Adoption patterns of SIPs

Using non-adoption as a reference category. The model estimates show that;

The gender of the plot manager does not influence the adoption of the SIPs.

Female farmers in female-headed households are less likely to adopt improved

maize and CSD, whiles their counterparts in male-headed households are more

likely to adopt CSD.

Factors that affect adoption and impact of SIPs include household size, land

tenure, livestock ownership, educational level, farmer's age, group membership,

improved seeds, number of traders the household knows, plot distance, soil

characteristics, agro-ecological zone, and source of information on SIPs.

2.1. Average treatment effects of SIPs

Figure1: Africa RISING intervention communities in northern Ghana

Exploring Gender Differentials in Adoption of Sustainable Intensification Practices in Northern Ghana

Shaibu Mellon Bedi1*, Bekele Hundie Kotu2,Cornelis Gardebroek1,Stephen Frimpong2

1Wageningen University and Research Center, The Netherlands2International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ghana

*Corresponding author email: [email protected]

AcknowledgementThis research publication was made possible with support fromUnited State Agency for International development (USAID) through the

Africa Research In Sustainable Intensification for the Next Generation

(Africa RISING) program as part of the US Government's Feed the Future

Initiative.

Introduction

Research Objectives

Material and Methods