exploring the 80 tiny home downsizers ecological …...used solar power & reduced energy usage...

1
EXPLORING THE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINTS OF TINY HOME DOWNSIZERS Nine interviews were conducted to create an inventory of 100+ behaviors that changed after downsizing to a tiny home. These are the most common behaviors PRO-ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIORS average percentage of renewable energy in tiny homes (compared to 2% in previous homes) 37% A LOOK AT THE STUDY PARTICIPANTS... volunteered to participate in a research study to measure their previous ecological footprints in prior housing and their current ecological footprints after living in a tiny home for a year or more. 80 TINY HOME DOWNSIZERS CURRENT FOOTPRINT AVERAGE 3.87 gha* IN TINY HOME PREVIOUS FOOTPRINT AVERAGE 7.01 gha* IN PRIOR HOUSING Mobile Tiny Homes Semi-Permanent Tiny Homes Permanent Tiny Homes TOP REASONS TO DOWNSIZE Financial reasons Seeking a simpler life Environmental reasons Wanted mobility/ability to travel Seeking a drastic change in lifestyle ~366 MILLION ACRES WORTH OF RESOURCES could be saved if 10% of Americans lived in a tiny home FOR MORE INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT Maria Saxton, Ph.D. maria.[email protected] (Published July 2019) Purchased items intentionally Conserved water & used a compost toilet Less housing upkeep & maintenance Used solar power & reduced energy usage 77% Females 23% Males 43% 43% 14% All 80 study participants experienced lower ecological footprints after downsizing to a tiny home. All five ecological footprint components values (housing, food, transportation, goods, and services) were reduced on average. 49% Working Full-Time 19% Working Part-Time 14% Retired 18% Other $20,000 - $29,000: most common annual income 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 45-54 45-54 2% 30% 20% 9% 33% 6% AGES 85% OF TINY HOMES considered to have “effiency- centered design” or were “above average” in terms of energy efficiency 2 years 10 months average length of time spent living in tiny home at the time of this study 80% of tiny homes had running water 20% of tiny homes had no running water Reduction of car, motorcycle, bus, and train traveling distances Reduction of airplane travel More efficient fuel economies of vehicles TRANSPORTATION Decrease in meat consumption across all categories Increase in consumption of local, unpackaged, and self-produced food items FOOD Approximately a 15% increase in recycling Most study participants said they generate “much less” trash than their neighbors RECYCLING Over 50% of study participants shared that their purchasing habits are “minimal” or “nonexistent” while living in their tiny home PURCHASING *gha = global hectare, equalling 10,000 square meters or 2.471 acreas AN AVERAGE REDUCTION OF 3.14 GHA OR 45% 1,620 square feet -average size of previous home- 233 square feet -average tiny home size- GENERAL TRENDS HERE ARE THEIR RESULTS!

Upload: others

Post on 11-Jul-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: EXPLORING THE 80 TINY HOME DOWNSIZERS ECOLOGICAL …...Used solar power & reduced energy usage 77% Females 23% Males 43% 43% 14% All 80 study participants experienced lower ecological

EXPLORING THEECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINTS

OF TINY HOMEDOWNSIZERS

Nine interviews were conducted to create an inventory of 100+ behaviors

that changed after downsizing to a tiny home. These are the most

common behaviors

PRO-ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIORS

average percentage of renewable energy in tiny homes

(compared to 2% in previous homes)

37%

A LOOK AT THE STUDY PARTICIPANTS...

volunteered to participate in a research study to measure their previous ecological footprints

in prior housing and their current ecological footprints after living in a tiny home for a year or more.

80 TINY HOME DOWNSIZERS

CURRENT FOOTPRINT AVERAGE

3.87 gha*IN TINY HOME

PREVIOUS FOOTPRINT AVERAGE

7.01 gha*IN PRIOR HOUSING

MobileTiny Homes

Semi-PermanentTiny Homes

PermanentTiny Homes TOP REASONS TO DOWNSIZE

Financial reasonsSeeking a simpler life

Environmental reasonsWanted mobility/ability to travel

Seeking a drastic change in lifestyle

~366 MILLION ACRESWORTH OF RESOURCES

could be saved if 10% of Americans lived in a tiny home

FOR MORE INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACTMaria Saxton, Ph.D. [email protected](Published July 2019) Purchased

items intentionally

Conserved water & used a compost toilet

Less housing upkeep &

maintenance

Used solar power & reduced

energy usage

77%Females

23%Males

43% 43% 14%

All 80 study participants experienced lower ecological footprints after downsizing to a tiny home.

All �ve ecological footprint components values (housing, food, transportation, goods, and services)

were reduced on average.49% Working Full-Time

19% Working Part-Time

14% Retired

18% Other

$20,000 - $29,000:

most common

annual income

18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-7445-5445-54

2% 30% 20% 9% 33% 6%

AGES

85% OF TINY HOMES considered to have

“e�ency- centered design” or were “above average” in terms of energy e�ciency

2 years 10 monthsaverage length of time spent living in tiny home at

the time of this study80% of tiny homes

had running water

20% of tiny homes had no running water

Reduction of car, motorcycle, bus, and train

traveling distances Reduction of airplane

travel More e�cient fuel

economies of vehicles

TRANSPORTATION

Decrease in meat consumption across all categories

Increase in consumption of local,

unpackaged, and self-produced food

items

FOOD

Approximately a 15% increase

in recycling Most study

participants said they generate “much less”

trash than their neighbors

RECYCLING

Over 50% of study participants

shared that their purchasing habits are

“minimal” or “nonexistent” while

living in their tiny home

PURCHASING

*gha = global hectare, equalling 10,000 square meters or 2.471 acreas

AN AVERAGE REDUCTION OF 3.14 GHA OR 45%

1,620 square feet

-average size of previous home-

233 square feet

-average tiny home size-

GENERAL TRENDS

HERE ARE THEIR RESULTS!