exploring the human dimensions of bird conservation
DESCRIPTION
Exploring The Human Dimensions of Bird Conservation. Participants: Individuals. 22 Federal Partners. 11 State Partners. 15 Private Partners. Participants: Organizations. 7 Federal Agencies. 7 State Agencies. 7 Private Orgs. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
EXPLORING THE HUMAN DIMENSIONS OF BIRD CONSERVATION
22 FEDERAL PARTNERS
15 PRIVATE PARTNERS
11 STATE PARTNERS
PARTICIPANTS: INDIVIDUALS
PARTICIPANTS: ORGANIZATIONS7 FEDERAL AGENCIES
7 PRIVATE ORGS
7 STATE AGENCIES
“everything in conservation that is not about wildlife and habitats” Decker et al., 2012
“Understanding private landowner attitudes towards free-ranging elk prior to reintroduction of the species in Great Smoky Mountain NP would help determine true carrying capacity.”
“We would have been able to identify the balance between waterfowl population and habitat objectives in NAWMP if we had better knowledge of the hunting and birding communities’ respective desires.”
WORKSHOP OBJECTIVES1. Learn the basics of human dimensions science.
2. Understand what we already know about “our people”.
3. Hear cases where we’ve successfully applied human dimensions science to conservation.
4. Practice what we’ve learned by talking through real-world scenarios.
5. Think about what comes next.
Four Themes
1. Human dimensions science is, in fact, a science.
Social &
SLIDE CREDIT: ASHLEY DAYER
BPOPHarvest
Recruitment
Mortality
JV1
Landscape components
Life history requirements
JV2
Landscape components
Life history requirements
Landscape components
Life history requirements
JV…
Recruitment
Mortality
Recruitm
ent
Mortality
Hunter Activity
NAWMP Model for Individual Species
SLIDE CREDIT: ANDY RAEDEKE
Habitat
HunterNumbers
BPOP
Turnover
RetentionRecruitment
Attrition
Reg
ion
3
Capacity to Hunt
Decisions to Hunt
Recruitment
Attrition
Recruitm
ent
Attrition
Identity Formation
Capacity to Hunt
Identity Formation
Decisions to Hunt
Capacity to Hunt
Identity Formation
Decisions to Hunt
Reg
ion
2R
egio
n 1
Proposed Hunter Participation Model
SLIDE CREDIT: ANDY RAEDEKE
2. We don’t have the luxury of maintaining the status quo
1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
Participation Trends
SLIDE CREDIT: LOREN CHASE
30
35
40
45
50
55
6019
98
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Average Age of DU Magazine ReadershipM
illio
ns
Average increase in age of 1 year each year
SLIDE CREDIT: DALE HUMBURG
3. Conservation isn’t complicated, people are complicated.
“Averaging 8.2 million viewers in its 3rd season, "Duck Dynasty" is the No. 1 nonfictional television series on cable.”U.S. News and World Report, March 20 2013
BarriersUnimportant
Important
Family commitments
Lack of time
Financial reasons
Don’t know where
Lack of equipment
Physically unable
Don’t know how
Lack of interest
Nobody to go with
Intimidated by nature SLIDE CREDIT: LOREN CHASE
4. Wildlife management decisions are based on our assumptions about people and how they behave
SLIDE CREDIT: NATALIE SEXTON
Meaningful Stakeholder Engagement in PlanningCanaan Valley NWR
Understanding the Playing Field
High Concer
n
LowConcer
n
LowConsensu
s
HighConsensu
s
Collaboration
Opportunities
Good Faith Opportuniti
es
X Strategic Concentrati
on
SLIDE CREDIT: NATALIE SEXTON
Wildlife conservation: populations, habitats, & people
NEXT STEPS1. NAWMP-NFC Human Dimensions Working Group
2. Share information from workshop widely throughout the bird conservation community
4. 2013 National Conservation Need: Strengthening state fish & wildlife agency capacity to understand and respond to changing trends in constituent values and demographics.
3. 2013 webinar series in conjunction with AFWA’s wildlife viewing and nature tourism working group