exposure of the belgian consumer to chemical contaminants and … · 2012- 2015 2016- 2020 cancer...
TRANSCRIPT
EXPOSURE OF THE BELGIAN CONSUMER TO CHEMICAL CONTAMINANTS AND
HEALTH CONSEQUENCES
Greet SchoetersBrussels, 24 November 2017
30/11/2017
©VITO – Not for distribution 1
CHEMICALS IN FOOD
30/11/2017
©VITO – Not for distribution 2
Synthetic chemicals can enter into food • Intentionally: additives• Unintentionally : contaminants
https://dwh.efsa.europa.eu/bi/asp/Main.aspx?rwtrep=400.
MULTIPLE SOURCES/ MULTIPLE PATHWAYS
3
Parabenes D. Bledzka et al. Env. Int, 67, 2014
CHEMICALS AND HUMAN BIOMONITORING
30/11/2017
©VITO – Not for distribution 4
Human biomonitoring measures chemicals, their metabolitesor reaction products in human tissues
BIOMONITORING MAKES POLLUTION PERSONAL
Dose=f (C environment , behaviour, kinetics, personal characteristics)
THE FLEMISH HUMAN BIOMONITORING PROGRAM (FLEHS)
VITO
PIH
VUB
UG
KUL
UH
UA
coordinatie
communicatie
epidemiologie
veldwerk
toxicologie
voeding
Financed by the Flemish Dept. of Science and Innovation, Nature and Energy and the Agency for Care and Health (FLEHS I, II, III), and by the Department of Environment (FLEHS IV)
2002- 2006 2007- 2011
2012- 2015 2016- 2020
Cancer riskAsthma and allergy
Puberty developmentAsthma & allergy
Growth & DevelopmentAsthma & allergy
Exposure and effect bio markers ( blood, urine, hair)Health outcomes: weight, height, birth parameters, clinical examinations at school, questionnaires ( asthma, allergy (ISAAC), strenghts and difficulties, (SDQ), Child behaviour check list , NES testsExposure related research: air pollutant modelling, dietary POPs intakeBiomarker development: transcriptomics, epigenetics ( cord and saliva)
FLEHS Reference values
Socioeconomic
status
FLEMISH ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH SURVEY
15 years of follow up of general population 3 hot spotsMore than 5500 participantssamples stored in biobank
More than 50 biomarkers of exposure and effectsPOPs, heavy metals, organophosphates, pyrethroids, phthalates, musks,perfluorinated compouds, glyphosate,…Structured policy translation process
TIME TRENDS IN ADOLESCENTS (GEOMETRIC MEANS AND 95%CI)
8
Pb
POPs METALS
benzene
PAHs
TIME TRENDS IN NEWBORN CORD SAMPLES (GEOMETRIC MEANS + 95% CI)
9adjusted for age and BMI mother
20082008
2008PFOA in µg/L
Arsenic in µg/L adjusted for age and smoking mother
PFOS in µg/L2013
20132013
www.milieu-en-gezondheid.be
TOBACCO SMOKE AND PAH LEVELS IN ADOLESCENTS FLEHS III
FLEHS II ADOLESCENTS : DDE EXPOSURE DETERMINANTS IN ADOLESCENTS FLEHS III
DETERMINANTS OF PERSONAL EXPOSURE PRODUCTS IN ADOLESCENTS (FLEHS II)
Musks, triclosan, parabens: significantly related to use of personal care products (questionnaires)
Musks, triclosan: girls > boys(≈ questionnaires)
Musks: ASO > TSO > BSO (≠ questionnaires)
Parabens: students > adults
LINKING HBM TO SOURCES: LIFE STYLE FACTORS
Life style as a vector for pollution: E.g. nutrition, consumer products, indoor air,… FLEHS II, 2009
DETERMINANTS OF EXPOSURE (FLEHS III)
0
1
2
3
4
HCB TN OXC HCH
POP
conc
entr
atie
in se
rum
(ng/
g ve
t)
< 1 ei / week (n=148)1 ei / week (n=134)> 1 ei / week (n=118)
p=0,01
p=0,01 p=0,02 p=0,22
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
PCB's p,p'-DDE
POP
conc
entr
atie
in se
rum
(ng/
g ve
t)
p=0,01
p=0,002
compost
15
METALS IN FOOD – BIOMONITORING RESULTS
Exposures Cadmium Lead
Ma
nga
ne
se
Co
pp
er
Th
alli
um
N
icke
l
Ars
en
ic
Me
rcu
ry
Ne
wb
orn
s*
Ad
ole
sce
nts
**
Ad
ole
sce
nts
*
Ad
ult
s*
Ad
ole
sce
nts
*
Ad
ult
s*
Ad
ult
s*
Ne
wb
orn
s*
Ad
ole
sce
nts
*
Ad
ole
sce
nts
**
Ad
ole
sce
nts
**
Ad
ult
s**
Ad
ole
sce
nts
**
Ad
ole
sce
nts
**
Ad
ole
sce
nts
**
A
do
lesc
en
ts*
*
Ad
ole
sce
nts
*
Ad
ult
s**
Ad
ole
sce
nts
$
Ad
ole
sce
nts
$
Food: specific sources: fish ↑e,f
↑e,f
↑f
↑d,e
↑f ↑e,f
↑ ↑
Food: specific sources: vegetables, fruit, rice, grain ↑ ↑ ↑a ↑b
Food: leafy vegetables ↑
Food: specific sources: local vegetables ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑
Food: Specific sources: crustaceans ↑f
Food: Specific sources: chocolat ↑
Food: Canned food ↑ ↑
*: measurement in blood**: measurement in urine$ : measured in haira: legumes; b: nuts and seeds; c: MMA; d:DMA; e:Toxicologically relevant arsenic (TRA); f: total arsenic
FLEHS 1
FLEHS 2
FLEHS 3
Genk Zuid Menen1
↑Significant associations(p<0.05)
16
ORGANOCHLORINES IN FOOD Exposure Sum PCBs P,p’-DDE HCB Oxyc
hlordane
Trans- nonachlore
Lindane
PFAS
Ne
wb
orn
s
Ne
wb
orn
s A
do
lesc
en
ts
Ad
ole
sce
nts
A
du
lts
Ne
wb
orn
s N
ew
bir
ns
Ad
ole
sce
nts
Ad
ole
sce
nts
A
du
lts
Ne
wb
orn
s A
do
lesc
en
ts
Ad
ole
sce
nts
A
do
lesc
en
ts
Ad
ult
s N
ew
bo
rns
A
do
lesc
en
ts
Ne
wb
orn
s
Ad
ole
sce
nts
A
du
lts
N
ew
bo
rns
Ad
ole
sce
nts
N
ew
bo
rns
Ad
ole
sce
nts
A
du
lts
Ad
ult
s
Food: specific sources: fish ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ Food: specific sources : animal fat ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ Food: specific sources: vegetables, fruit, rice, grain
↑
Food: specific sources: eggs ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑i Food: specific sources : milk and milk products
↑
Food: specific sources: offal ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑hi
Food: self caught fish ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ Food: specific sources: local food ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ Food: specific sources: local vegetables ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑
g ↑g
Food: specific sources: local eggs ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑g
↑g
↑g
↑g
Food: specific sources: well water ↑ Food: specific sources: potatoes ↑j Food: Mediterranean diet ↑ Food: Specific sources: crustaceans ↑i
FLEHS 1
FLEHS 2
FLEHS 3
Menen1
Genk Zuid
17
FLEHS IV
Flemish center of expertise on E&H: FLEHS IV
Green spaces
Eco-behavior
Emergingchemicals
Human biomonitoring:internal exposure to environmental
substances&
Effects on health
built environmentproximity to greenproximity to blue
organic foodhome grown food (city gardening)
ventilationaerationeco-friendly materials
…
Changing environment
LINKAGE TO HEALTH
Residence in hot spot area has an effect on health ?
Health impact?
Genk vs.Vlaanderen
Proportion of participants :• Above health based guidance value? • Above clinical reference?
HEAVY METALS AND HEALTH IMPACT:
COMPARISON WITH GUIDELINESBlood lead: All participants < WHO guideline (100 µg/L)
Urinary cadmium: HBM I = 0.5 µg/L no expected health damage Above HBM I: 19.6% in Genk-Zuid
vs. 11.4% in Flanders (p=0.054)Toxic arsenic in urine: Biomonitoring Equivalent = 6.4 µg/l Above BE: 64.5% in Genk-Zuid
vs. 33.8% in Flanders (p=0.01)
HBM: LINKING ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE TO HEALTH EFFECTS
20
air
soil
consumerproducts
biomarkers of exposure
biomarkers of effects
health effects
soil
water
dust
air
serum PCBs
urinary triclosan
serum PBDEs
p,p’-DDE in milk fat
…
hormone levels
birth weight
DNA damage
gene expression
…
food
environmental monitoring
growth
puberty
IQ
behaviour
asthma
cancer
…
META-ANALYSIS EHP SINGLE POLLUTANT MODELS
Association PCB 153 (ng/L) with birth weight
21
Govarts et al. 2012, EHP
HBM4EU: BUILDING ON EXISTING KNOWLEDGE
22
Timeframe and budget:5 years (2017-2021)European Joint Programme under Horizon 2020Total budget: € 74 million
28 countries and the European Environment Agency:24 EU Member States3 associated countries (Iceland, Israel, Norway)Switzerland
Coordinated by the German Environment Agency (UBA)
06th Sept 2017
23
Answer open policy relevantquestions as defined by EU
Services and partner countries
Give policy makers a fast andeasy access to results and
data
Guide policy makersfor translating results
into policy actions
Harmonised collection and assessment of data
24
WP2: Knowledge Hub
WP1: Programme management and coordinationScientific and Administrative Management
WP3: Internal Calls WP17: Ethics Requirements
25
ANSWER POLICY RELEVANT QUESTIONS: INVOLVEMENT OF POL MAKERS
ENVchemicals legislation
(e.g. REACH), air/water pollution,
noise RTD R&I
framework programme
EMPLworker safety, exposure to chemicals
SANTE food
contaminant, pesticides,
biocides, EDs
GROW product safety,
cosmetics, REACH
EU level
JRC scientific and technical support
EEAenvironment data, information, assessment
ECHA REACH regulation
EFSArisk assessment for food and feed
30.06.2017
Stakeholders:Citizens
National NGOS, Industry
representatives
Ministries/Policy Leads in Environment and Human
Health
Research institutes:National Expertise
HBM4EU Partner
National hubs
PRIORITY SUBSTANCES TO START WITH IN THE 1ST YEAR
26
date 27
STUDY DESIGN Collecting European data from past and ongoing studies
Design new targeted studies to fill in the data gaps
European representative data
Specific age groups Sex From different EU regions: North, South, East, Ouest From high and low population density areas Represent different socio-economic classes
Data analysis at EU level
HBM4EU- AN INNOVATIVE APPROACHFrom the start:
- inclusion of policy makers on national and EU level- focus on communication and sustainabilty
Building a European network and strengthening co-ordination in partnercountries
Use of existing data and generation of new data to answer question relevant for environment and health
Fast and transparent access- to deliverables, SOPs, results… via Knowledge Hub
-to data via IPCheM
https://www.hbm4eu.eu/
https://ipchem.jrc.ec.europa.eu/RDSIdiscovery/ipchem/index.html28
Voettekst invulling29
JURGEN BUKERS, ANN COLLESFLEHS COLLEAGUES
European joint program funded underH2020https://www.hbm4eu.eu/Coordinated by UBACo-coordinated by VITO
Thank you
The FLEHS studies are commissioned, financed, and steered by the Ministries of Environment, Health , Science and Innovation of the Flemish Community. Coordinated by VITO,
www.milieu-en-gezondheid.be