extending the useful life of prestressed concrete bridges using ... › projects › research ›...

51
1 NC STATE UNIVERSITY Extending the Useful Life of Prestressed Concrete Bridges Using Mechanically-Fastened Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Lt. Col. Brad C. McCoy, Ph.D., P.E., ENV SP Presented to: NCDOT Research and Innovation Summit May 7 th , 2019

Upload: others

Post on 04-Jul-2020

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 1

    NC STATE UNIVERSITY

    Extending the Useful Life of Prestressed Concrete Bridges Using Mechanically-Fastened Fiber-Reinforced Polymer

    Lt. Col. Brad C. McCoy, Ph.D., P.E., ENV SP

    Presented to:NCDOT Research and Innovation Summit

    May 7th, 2019

  • 2

    NC STATE UNIVERSITY

    Problem Statement Background Research Objective Literature Review Topics Retrofit Concept

    Small-scale Testing Results

    Full-scale Testing and Results Retrofit Design Full-scale tests Installation optimization

    Conclusions

    Future Research

    Agenda

  • 3

    NC STATE UNIVERSITY

    Deteriorated Prestressed Concrete Superstructures

    Sectional capacity vs. Concrete tensile stress

    C-channel girder – Bridge No. 380093

    Partial loss of prestressing and concrete cover

    Complete loss of prestressing and concrete cover

    Hollow core slab – North Wake Co.

    Problem Statement

  • 4

    NC STATE UNIVERSITY

    Primary Research Objective

    Life cycle of 3 – 5 years until permanent repair or replacement

    Time and cost of retrofit installation Capability to monitor and maintain Durability of solution

    Additional Considerations

    Development of a methodology: address common load rating challenges for deteriorated

    prestressed concrete bridge superstructures optimized to maximize efficiency of the system and

    minimize installation time and resources Bridge remains open without load posting

    Installation and inspection capable with DOT personnel

    Cost of alternate solutions: Closures, detours, delays, etc.

    Problem Statement

  • 5

    NC STATE UNIVERSITY

    Implementation Observations of bridge

    inspections and maintenance procedures NCDOT crew capabilities

    Optimization installation time skill level

    Quantifiable impact of detours for posted candidate bridges travel time $$$

    Design Small-scale material testing:

    with and without holes hole pattern analysis hole spacing analysis fastener bearing analysis

    Connection post-tensioning concrete splitting

    Full-scale testing undamaged / damaged with / without retrofit retrofit efficiency

    Implementation Road Map

    Design Guide

    Installation &Maintenance

    Lit. Review Topics MF-FRP In-place concrete strength Concrete splitting behavior Vehicle operating cost Digital Image Correlation (DIC) Bridge load rating considerations

    Current State of Practice

  • 6

    NC STATE UNIVERSITY

    0125 in.

    4 in.

    Continuous-strand glass mat top and bottom

    Polyester surfacingveil-perimeter

    Carbon tows and fiberglass rovings in vinyl ester resin

    FRP Plate

    Problem Statement

  • 7

    NC STATE UNIVERSITY

    Retrofit Concept Sketch

    C-channel beam:

    Problem Statement

  • 8

    NC STATE UNIVERSITY Problem Statement

    Retrofit Concept Sketch

    FRP

    Mechanical fasteners to substrate

    Mechanical fasteners to connector plate

    Prestressing mechanism

    Live-endDead-end

    Hollow core slab:

  • 9

    NC STATE UNIVERSITY

    Initial Small-Scale Material Testing

    Specimen ID No. of

    Replicates Treatment Description ASTM T 8 No holes D3039

    S-OH 6 Single open hole centered in gauge length D57661

    DBL4-OH-1.5 6 4 open holes; 2-by-2; 1.5 in. transverse spacing; 4 in. longitudinal spacing D57661

    DBL4-OH-2.0 6 4 open holes; 2-by-2; 2.0 in. transverse spacing; 4 in. longitudinal spacing D57661

    STG4-OH-1.5 6 4 open holes; staggered with 2.0 in. offset; 1.5 in. transverse spacing; 4.0 in. longitudinal spacing D57661

    STG4-OH-2.0 6 4 open holes; staggered with 2.0 in. offset; 2.0 in. transverse spacing; 4.0 in. longitudinal spacing D57661

    S-B-X-1.5 6 Single bolt bearing with 1.5 in. edge distance excluding threads D5961 S-B-N-1.5 6 Single bolt bearing with 1.5 in. edge distance including threads D5961 S-B-X-4.0 6 Single bolt bearing with 4.0 in. edge distance excluding threads NA S-B-N-4.0 6 Single bolt bearing with 4.0 in. edge distance including threads NA

    DBL16-B-1.5 6 16 bolts; 0.5 in. diameter; 2-by-2; 1.5 in. transverse spacing; 4.0 in. longitudinal spacing NA

    DBL18-B-1.5 6 18 bolts; 0.5 in. diameter; 2-by-2; 1.5 in. transverse spacing; 4.0 in. longitudinal spacing NA

    DBL20-B-1.5 6 20 bolts; 0.5 in. diameter; 2-by-2; 1.5 in. transverse spacing; 4.0 in. longitudinal spacing NA

    DBL22-B-1.5 6 22 bolts; 0.5 in. diameter; 2-by-2; 1.5 in. transverse spacing; 4.0 in. longitudinal spacing NA

    Material Testing

  • 10

    NC STATE UNIVERSITY

    0.5 in. Diameter Multi-Bolt

    Mean multi-bolt load-displacement curves (DBL series)

    Maximum prestress level

    FRP with holes

    Material Testing

  • 11

    NC STATE UNIVERSITY

    Full-Scale C-channel TestingSpecimen ID Specimen Description

    U Undamaged Control D Damaged (deteriorated) Control

    MF-FRP-U1 Undamaged with first version retrofit (MF-FRP 1.0) installed on both stems MF-FRP-U2 Undamaged with improved retrofit (MF-FRP 2.0) installed on both stems MF-FRP-D1 Damaged with MF-FRP 1.0 installed on both stems MF-FRP-D2 Damaged with MF-FRP 2.0 installed on both stems

    Test set-up

    Full-scale Testing

  • 12

    NC STATE UNIVERSITY

    MF-FRP 1.0 Design

    Dead-end

    Live-end

    Full-scale Testing

  • 13

    NC STATE UNIVERSITY

    MF-FRP 1.0 Design

    Dead-end

    Live-end

    Full-scale Testing

  • 14

    NC STATE UNIVERSITY

    Control Specimen D

    MF-FRP-D1

    MF-FRP-U1

    Control Specimen U

    MF-FRP 1.0 Results

    Original Inventory LoadDamaged Inventory Load

    MF-FRP-D Inventory Load

    Original Operating Load

    Damaged Operating Load

    ≈ MF-FRP-D Operating Load

    Full-scale Testing

  • 15

    NC STATE UNIVERSITY

    MF-FRP 1.0 Results

    In-plane moment developed in FRP plate at dead-end

    Longitudinal splitting initiated at dead-end

    Full-scale Testing

  • 16

    NC STATE UNIVERSITY

    MF-FRP 2.0 Design

    Dead-end and

    Live-end

    FRP PlateFRP Connector Plate

    Fixed Plate

    Pin Connection

    Fixed PlatePin Connection

    TB Connector Plate

    Turnbuckle (TB)

    Dead-end Live-end

    Full-scale Testing

  • 17

    NC STATE UNIVERSITY

    MF-FRP 2.0 Design

    Dead-end

    Live-end

    Full-scale Testing

  • 18

    NC STATE UNIVERSITY

    Control Specimen D

    MF-FRP-D1

    MF-FRP-U1

    Control Specimen U

    MF-FRP-U2

    MF-FRP-D2

    MF-FRP 2.0 Results

    Original Inventory LoadDamaged Inventory Load

    MF-FRP-D Inventory Load

    Original Operating Load

    Damaged Operating Load

    ≈ MF-FRP-D Operating Load

    Full-scale Testing

  • 19

    NC STATE UNIVERSITY

    MF-FRP 2.0 Results

    FRP plate post-testing: minor longitudinal splitting

    Live-end Dead-end

    PFRP = 30 kips

    Recall MF-FRP 1.0 FRP failure

    Full-scale Testing

  • 20

    NC STATE UNIVERSITY

    MF-FRP 2.0 ResultsFull-scale Testing

  • 21

    NC STATE UNIVERSITY

    Installation Time (labor-hrs.)

    MF-FRP 1.0 MF-FRP 2.0 Task W C NW TOTAL W C NW TOTAL

    Locate steel 0.3 0.1 0 0.4 0.2 0.1 0 0.3 Drill live-end 0.8 0.5 0.8 2.0 0.5 0.5 0.3 1.3 Drill dead-end 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 0.5 0.5 0.3 1.3 Attach live-end 0.5 0.3 0.2 1.0 0.3 0.2 0 0.4 Attach dead-end 0.2 0.3 0 0.7 0.2 0.1 0 0.3 Post-tension FRP 0.4 0.5 0.4 1.2 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.7

    TOTAL 3.1 2.7 2.5 8.3 1.9 1.7 0.5 4.1 Percent of Total, % 37.7 32.7 29.6 100 46.9 40.8 12.2 100

    Installation OptimizationFull-scale Testing

  • 22

    NC STATE UNIVERSITY

    Key Conclusions For a complete retrofit solution to meet both inventory and operating

    ratings, it must restore prestress losses and strength due to deterioration. [ASCE Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities; under review]

    The FRP plate examined in this research is capable of restoring prestress losses due to moderate deterioration in prestressed concrete bridge superstructures with sufficient residual capacity for strength restoration. Further, the FRP plate can be mechanically fastened with sufficient optimization for ultimate capacity, bearing stress, and anchor length. [ASCE Journal of Composites in Construction; in press]

    MF-FRP methodology is capable of sufficiently restoring prestressed concrete superstructure with moderate deterioration such that the bridge is capable of supporting original inventory and operating loads. Further, MF-FRP 2.0 is optimized for rapid installation.[ASCE Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities; under review]

    Conclusions

  • 23

    NC STATE UNIVERSITY Future Research

    NC Bridge: 340080

  • 24

    NC STATE UNIVERSITY

    Planned

    Investigation to quantify installation and maintenance costs of the MF-FRP retrofit solution to aid in complete life-cycle-cost analysis.

    Investigation of alternative composite systems to replace steel components in MF-FRP connections.

    Military applications to increase Military Load Classification of bridges in forward theaters of operation

    Future Research

  • 25

    NC STATE UNIVERSITY

    Acknowledgements

  • 26

    NC STATE UNIVERSITY

    Questions

  • 4D MODELING AND DISCRETE EVENT SIMULATION FOR PHASING HIGHWAY RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS

    Mohammed Mawlana, Ph.D.

    05-07-2019

  • 2

    Outline Introduction

    Proposed Method

    Implementation

    Case Study

  • 3

    Introduction

    Transportation developments are shifting from the construction of new

    highways to the reconstruction of existing facilities.

    The most important factor in the reconstruction of urban highway projects is

    the duration of the project.

    The duration of reconstruction projects not only impacts the users of highways,

    but also affects the whole community around the project area.

  • 4

    Introduction

    Simulation is a powerful tool that can be used to mimic the behavior of real-

    world systems over time.

    Usage:

    » planning and resource allocation

    » comparing alternative construction methods

    » analyzing earthmoving operations bridge construction operations

  • 5

    Proposed Method

    A two-stage method that can be used in planning the phasing of

    elevated urban highway reconstruction projects:

    » Phasing Plan Assessment: Generates a clash-free reconstruction phasing plan that meets the imposed traffic and construction constraints.

    » Stochastic Spatiotemporal Clash Detection: Captures the uncertainty in the durations of the reconstruction work, detects stochastic spatiotemporal

    clashes and calculates their probabilities if they exist.

  • 6

    Phasing Plan Assessment

    Generate All Possible Plans

    3D ModelAvailable

    Contractors

    Traffic

    Management Plan

    Generate Deterministic 4D

    Model

    Time-based Clash Detection

    Eliminate Infeasible Plans

    Constraints of

    Construction/

    Demolition Methods

    Constraints

    Eliminate Infeasible Plans

    Select Optimum Feasible Plan

    Calculate Productivity Rates

    and Costs of the Contractors

    Rank Feasible Plans

  • 7

    Stochastic Spatiotemporal Clash Detection

    Apply Stochastic Simulation at

    those Locations

    Identify Potential Stochastic

    Spatiotemporal Clashes

    Calculate Clash Probability

    Select the Starting Date of the

    Determinant Segment Causing

    the Clash

    Time-based Clash Detection

  • 8

    Implementation Schematic Diagram

  • 9

    Case Study

    Existing Interchange Proposed Interchange

    The case study is inspired by the Turcot Interchange reconstruction project in Montreal, Canada

    • Built in the 1960s

    • Interconnect the three main highways 20, 15, and 720

    • Several bridge structures located on three different levels

  • 10

    Case Study - Constraints

    Two contractors available for constructing segment E, F, and G of the

    proposed interchange.

    One contractor responsible for the demolition of segment F’ of the existing

    interchange.

    The existing segment F’ cannot be demolished before either segment E or

    segment F of the proposed interchange is ready for traffic operation.

    Construction of segments G and E can only start from the west and south

    ends, respectively.

  • 11

    Case Study

    Existing interchange with marked segment F'

    Segment E, F, and G of proposed Interchange

  • 12

    Construction & Demolition Methods

  • 13

    Prototype System- Input of segments and contractors

  • 14

    System output of plans

  • 15

    System output of plans after applying traffic constraints

  • 16

    System output of plans after ranking

  • 17

    C2

    C 1

    Conflict

    Under

    Construction

    17

    1st Scenario: conflict

  • 18

    C 2

    C 1

    Ready for Traffic

    Demolition Start

    No Conflict

    Replay

    2nd Scenario: no conflict

    Demolition Start

    No Conflict

  • 19

    Combined probability

  • 20

    Total clash probability

  • Questions?

  • 22

    Traffic Circulations

    E

    GF

    F'

    E'

    G'

  • 23

    E

    GF

    F'

    E'

    G'

    Trolley

    www.colossaltransport.com

  • 24

    E

    GF

    F'

    E'

    G'

    Span Pick-up

    www.cec.com.tw

  • 25

    E

    GF

    F'

    E'

    G'

    Span Placing

    www.sdi-intl.com

    BMcCoyMcCoy Presentation v. 1.0Extending the Useful Life of Prestressed Concrete Bridges Using Mechanically-Fastened Fiber-Reinforced PolymerSlide Number 2Slide Number 3Slide Number 4Slide Number 5Slide Number 6Slide Number 7Slide Number 8Slide Number 9Slide Number 10Slide Number 11Slide Number 12Slide Number 13Slide Number 14Slide Number 15Slide Number 16Slide Number 17Slide Number 18Slide Number 19Slide Number 20Slide Number 21Slide Number 22Slide Number 23Slide Number 24Slide Number 25Slide Number 26

    MMawlanaNCDOT Summit 2019 - NCAT Mawlana