extensor allograft technique
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/17/2019 Extensor Allograft Technique
1/20
COPYRIGHT © 2005 BY THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY, INCORPORATED
Extensor MechanismAllograft ReconstructionAfter Total Knee ArthroplastySurgical TechniqueBy R. Stephen J. Burnett, MD, FRCS(C), Richard A. Berger, MD, Craig J. Della Valle, MD, Scott M. Sporer, MD,Joshua J. Jacobs, MD, Wayne G. Paprosky, MD, and Aaron G. Rosenberg, MD
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
The original scientific article in which the surgical technique was presented was published in JBJS Vol. 86-A, pp. 2694-2699, December 2004
INTRODUCTION
Extensor mechanism disruption is a devastating complication of to-tal knee arthroplasty. Multiple techniques for repair or reconstruc-tion of a deficient extensor mechanism have been described inassociation with total knee arthroplasty; however, few have beenable to reliably restore a functional extensor mechanism1. Despiteencouraging results reported for direct repair in native knees, at-
tempts at primary repair following a total knee arthroplasty rarelyrestore extensor function. The use of local autogenous tissue toaugment a primary repair has been recommended. These patientshave frequently undergone multiple previous knee procedures, andthese local autogenous tissues may be compromised and unsuitablefor use.
Emerson et al.2,3 reported on the use of a complete knee extensormechanism allograft in total knee arthroplasty to reconstruct the defi-cient extensor mechanism. Although the early clinical results werepromising, extensor lag occurred early. Nazarian and Booth4 modifiedthe technique described by Emerson et al., recommending that the al-
lograft be tightly tensioned in full extension, and they reported im-proved early results. The host tissue-allograft junctions recently havebeen studied5, and the findings have provided useful information insupport of this technique.
In the present report, we describe the surgical techniquethat we have modified and currently use6 to reconstruct the defi-cient extensor mechanism with an extensor mechanism allograftthat is tightly tensioned with the knee in full extension. The criticalconcepts, pitfalls, and technical aspects of this technique arepresented.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
Disruption of the extensor mecha-
nism is an uncommon but cata-
strophic complication of total
knee arthroplasty. We evaluated
two techniques of reconstructing
a disrupted extensor mechanismwith the use of an extensor mech-
anism allograft in revision total
knee arthroplasty.
METHODS:
Twenty consecutive reconstruc-
tions with the use of an extensor
mechanism allograft consisting
of the tibial tubercle, patellar ten-
don, patella, and quadriceps ten-
don were performed. The first
seven reconstructions (Group I)
were done with the allograft mini-
mally tensioned. The thirteen sub-
sequent procedures (Group II)
were performed with the allograft
tightly tensioned in full extension.
All surviving allografts were evalu-
ated clinically and radiographically
after a minimum duration of
follow-up of twenty-four months.
continued
-
8/17/2019 Extensor Allograft Technique
2/20
THE J OURNAL OF B ON E & JOINT S URGERY · SURGICAL TECHNIQUES SEPTEMBER 2005 · VOLUME 87-A · SUPPLEMENT 1 , PAR T 2 · JBJS.OR G
INITIAL EVALUATION
A deficient extensor mechanismin association with a total kneearthroplasty is one of the mostchallenging problems that theorthopaedic surgeon who per-forms joint replacement surgery
may encounter. The patient isinitially evaluated with a history,directed physical examination ofthe knee and extremity, radio-graphs, and adjunctive investiga-tions. The history should focuson obtaining information about
prior extensor mechanism proce-dures or surgery and the priorand current function of the knee.Symptoms of instability, giving-way, and an inability to extendthe knee should be sought. Thenature of previous surgeries and
ABSTRACT | continued
RESULTS:
All of the reconstructions in GroupI were clinical failures, with an av-
erage postoperative extensor lag
of 59° (range, 40° to 80°) and an
average postoperative Hospital for
Special Surgery knee score of 52
points. All thirteen reconstruc-
tions in Group II were clinical
successes, with an average post-
operative extensor lag of 4.3°
(range, 0° to 15°) (p < 0.0001)
and an average Hospital for Spe-
cial Surgery score of 88 points.
Postoperative flexion did not differsignificantly between Group I (av-
erage, 108°) and Group II (aver-
age, 104°) (p = 0.549).
CONCLUSIONS:
The results of reconstruction with
an extensor mechanism allograft
after total knee arthroplasty de-
pend on the initial tensioning of
the allograft. Loosely tensioned
allografts result in a persistent ex-
tension lag and clinical failure. Al-lografts that are tightly tensioned
in full extension can restore active
knee extension and result in clini-
cal success. On the basis of the
number of knees that we studied,
there was no significant loss of
flexion. Use of an extensor mech-
anism graft for the treatment of a
failure of the extensor mechanism
will be successful only if the graft
is initially tensioned tightly in full
extension.
FIG. 2
A complete fresh-frozen, nonirradiated knee extensor mechanism allograft that includes
the tibia, patellar tendon, patella, and quadriceps tendon is used.
FIG. 1
Assessment of prior incisions over the knee and a careful examination are essential pre-
operatively when considering revision surgery.
-
8/17/2019 Extensor Allograft Technique
3/20
THE J OURNAL OF B ON E & JOINT S URGERY · SURGICAL TECHNIQUES SEPTEMBER 2005 · VOLUME 87-A · SUPPLEMENT 1 , PAR T 2 · JBJS.OR G
FIG. 4
The host extensor mechanism is sharply dissected longitudinally in the midline, through
the patellar tendon and quadriceps tendon.
the duration of extensor dys-function should be determined.Prior operative reports should bereviewed and scrutinized for theextensor mechanism and how it
was managed in previous surger-ies. A history of infection—re-motely or in association withprior surgery of the knee—war-rants further investigation.Medical comorbidities or im-munosuppressive therapy thatmay impact on wound-healingshould be sought. On physicalexamination, evaluation of thegait pattern and the use of walk-
ing aids are assessed. Prior inci-sions over the knee (Fig. 1) andactive and passive range of mo-tion are recorded. The presenceof an extensor lag should be care-fully measured, and the passiveamount of full extension that isable to be demonstrated shouldbe noted. The presence of a flex-ion contracture and the inability
to passively extend the knee arenoted. The tracking of the ex-tensor mechanism during range-of-motion testing should beexamined closely, as malrotationof the components of the totalknee arthroplasty may be a factorin the extensor mechanism fail-ure. Radiographs are evaluatedfor component alignment, fixa-tion, sizing, remaining host-bonestock, and the design of compo-nents. The extensor mechanismand patellar position are evalu-ated for patella infera, patellaalta, and the presence or absenceof a patella. In addition, the pres-ence of heterotopic ossificationinvolving the extensor mecha-
FIG. 3
Use of the previous incision is preferred. We use a sterile tourniquet as it is easily re-
moved for the allograft-host proximal graft repair.
-
8/17/2019 Extensor Allograft Technique
4/20
THE J OURNAL OF B ON E & JOINT S URGERY · SURGICAL TECHNIQUES SEPTEMBER 2005 · VOLUME 87-A · SUPPLEMENT 1 , PAR T 2 · JBJS.OR G
nism is noted. The presence ofsuture anchors or staples aroundthe insertion of the patellar ten-don into the tibial tubercle is of-ten an ominous radiographicsign. Patellar tracking is evalu-ated on the axial radiograph. Ifthere is any concern about mal-rotation of the components, werecommend an axial computedtomography scan of the femoraland tibial components to evalu-ate for component internalmalrotation7. The erythrocytesedimentation rate and serumC-reactive protein level are mea-sured to evaluate for infection. Ifthese are elevated, a knee aspira-tion is performed for cell countand synovial fluid culture.
Decision to Reconstruct theExtensor Mechanism with Use ofan Extensor Mechanism Allograft Once the diagnosis and etiology
of a deficient extensor mecha-nism is made, we discuss the sur-gical options with each patient.The indications and contraindi-cations are carefully reviewed.Ongoing infection or repeatedunsuccessful staged reimplanta-tion procedures with persistentinfection are contraindicationsto this procedure. The inabilityto comply with postoperative
immobilization and a directedphysical therapy program arealso contraindications. In theseinstances, bracing and nonop-erative treatment or knee ar-throdesis are discussed with thepatient. If the patient is a candi-date for surgery, the procedureand postoperative rehabilitationare discussed preoperatively. If
FIG. 6
A saw is used to split the patella from anterior to posterior in a longitudinal fashion, in
line with the extensor mechanism arthrotomy.
FIG. 5
The remaining patella or
remnant is split in the
midline with a saw, in line
with the proximal and dis-
tal split.
-
8/17/2019 Extensor Allograft Technique
5/20
THE J OURNAL OF B ON E & JOINT S URGERY · SURGICAL TECHNIQUES SEPTEMBER 2005 · VOLUME 87-A · SUPPLEMENT 1 , PAR T 2 · JBJS.OR G
the patient has an intact nativepatella and a deficient patellartendon, alternative allograft ex-tensor mechanism reconstruc-tions with the use of an Achillestendon-allograft calcaneal boneblock 8 may also be considered.We always plan to be preparedto revise and address malrotatedtotal knee arthroplasty com-ponents at the time of revisionsurgery.
Allograft Extensor MechanismPreoperatively, we order an al-lograft extensor mechanism ofthe entire knee that includes thetibia or a large portion of theproximal part of the tibia, thepatellar tendon, the patella, andat least 5 cm of quadriceps ten-don (Fig. 2). The allografts arefresh-frozen, nonirradiated spec-imens (Allosource, Centennial,
Colorado). We prefer the fresh-frozen over the freeze-dried al-lografts, given the results previ-ously described by Emerson etal.2,3 and concerns that freeze-drying may weaken the allografttissue, leading to complicationsand failure. The potential to gen-erate a greater risk of a host im-mune response than occurs withfresh-frozen specimens has also
been a concern. Before the pa-tient comes into the operatingroom and before the inductionof anesthesia, we visually inspectthe allograft to ensure that thereis an adequate specimen. Specifi-cally, there must be a proximaltibial allograft that will allowa bone-block harvest of at least5 cm attached to the patellar ten-
FIG. 8
Two sleeves of soft tissue are
reflected off the proximal part
of the tibia in the region of the
tibial tubercle, again maintain-
ing two flaps for later closure.
FIG. 7
The soft tissues around the patella are preserved in continuity with the retinaculum on
the medial and lateral sides of the two fragments.
-
8/17/2019 Extensor Allograft Technique
6/20
THE J OURNAL OF B ON E & JOINT S URGERY · SURGICAL TECHNIQUES SEPTEMBER 2005 · VOLUME 87-A · SUPPLEMENT 1 , PAR T 2 · JBJS.OR G
don and at least 5 cm of allograftquadriceps tendon proximally.
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
Patient Positioning We place the patient supine onthe operating table, with a sterilepneumatic tourniquet aroundthe thigh and a padded bump be-neath the trochanter. The leg isprepared and draped free, andthe foot is held in a leg holderduring the procedure to allow
variable amounts of flexion andextension.
Exposure of the Knee The pneumatic tourniquet is in-flated after exsanguination withan Esmarch bandage and flexionof the knee. Previous incisionsare marked (Fig. 3). We prefer amidline skin incision; however,
use of a previous incision is rec-ommended when present. Ifmultiple incisions are present,we use the most lateral incisionclosest to the midline, in orderto preserve blood supply to theskin. Often these are knees thathave had multiple operationsand may have undergone a previ-ous gastrocnemius flap or othersoft-tissue coverage procedure.In this instance, we are carefulnot to disrupt the blood supplyto this coverage and we have aplastic reconstructive surgeonavailable to assist during the ex-posure. The dissection is carrieddown in the midline with con-servative elevation of skin andsubcutaneous flaps. The retinac-ulum and extensor mechanismare then exposed. A midline inci-
FIG. 10
Removal of a malrotated femoral component. If malrotated components are left unad-
dressed, extensor mechanism maltracking will continue, with increased stress on the al-
lograft and early failure.
FIG. 9
Medial and lateral sleeves have been created, allowing direct exposure to the implants
and the anterior aspect of the tibia and tubercle.
-
8/17/2019 Extensor Allograft Technique
7/20
THE J OURNAL OF B ON E & JOINT S URGERY · SURGICAL TECHNIQUES SEPTEMBER 2005 · VOLUME 87-A · SUPPLEMENT 1 , PAR T 2 · JBJS.OR G
sion is performed through theremaining extensor mechanism(the quadriceps tendon and pa-tellar tendon or scar tissue), cre-ating medial and lateral flaps ofretinaculum and exposing the joint (Fig. 4). Culture specimensare obtained and sent to the mi-crobiology laboratory, and syn-ovial fluid is assessed for cellcount. If there is a native patellaor a remnant, it is osteotomizedin a longitudinal fashion in themidline (Fig. 5), in line with themidline soft-tissue retinacularincision (Figs. 6 and 7). The pa-tellar bone is then shelled outand carefully removed, preserv-ing the soft tissues in continuitywith the medial and lateral reti-nacular flaps. This bone is keptfor autogenous bone graft as nec-essary. The medial and lateralgutters and suprapatellar pouchare recreated. The midline inci-
sion is carried proximally intothe host quadriceps, again main-taining a medial and lateralsleeve of tissue for later closure.The midline incision is carriedover the host tibial tubercle withelevation of medial and lateralsoft-tissue flaps (Figs. 8 and 9).
Total Knee ArthroplastyComponent Revision
and ReimplantationRevision total knee arthroplastythen proceeds as necessary. Ro-tation of the femoral and tibialcomponents is assessed, and ourthreshold for revision of malro-tated components is very low,as they can contribute to exten-sor mechanism maltracking (Fig.10). Balancing of flexion and ex-
FIG. 11
The allograft tibial block is marked for a rectangular cut of 6 to 8 x 2 x 2 cm.
FIG. 12
The rectangular block is then marked for a later bevel cut proximally to create the dovetail.
-
8/17/2019 Extensor Allograft Technique
8/20
THE J OURNAL OF B ON E & JOINT S URGERY · SURGICAL TECHNIQUES SEPTEMBER 2005 · VOLUME 87-A · SUPPLEMENT 1 , PAR T 2 · JBJS.OR G
tension gaps is then performed,with careful attention to obtain-ing full passive extension of theknee. Trial components are re-moved, and definitive compo-nents are implanted in a routinefashion. The final polyethyleneliner is inserted prior to inser-tion of the extensor mechanismallograft. We have used this pro-cedure with primary cruciate-retaining, posterior stabilized,revision constrained condylardesigns, and constrained hingeknee designs. If stemmed com-ponents are being inserted, itmay be preferable to prepare thehost tibial bone trough and placethe fixation wires through thetibia at this stage, followed byinsertion of the stemmed tibialcomponent.
The revision total knee ar-throplasty implants are now inplace, and the host tissues are
next prepared to accept the ex-tensor mechanism allograft.
Allograft Preparationon the Back Table Simultaneous with the revisionor placement of the total kneearthroplasty components, theallograft specimen may be pre-pared on the back table. The hosttibial trough is not made until
we have harvested the allografttibial block, in order to ensurea press-fit of our allograft tibialblock. We first mark with amarking pen over the allografttibial tubercle and proximal partof the tibia our planned harvestof the allograft tibial bone block,in a rectangular fashion. Thelength of the block should be ap-
FIG. 13
Photograph of the rectangular tibial cut marked for the finishing bevel cut.
FIG. 14-B
Oblique view.
FIG. 14-A
Figs. 14-A through 14-D Finished cut of the tibial allograft segment with a proximal dove-
tail cut. Fig. 14-A Lateral view.
-
8/17/2019 Extensor Allograft Technique
9/20
THE J OURNAL OF B ON E & JOINT S URGERY · SURGICAL TECHNIQUES SEPTEMBER 2005 · VOLUME 87-A · SUPPLEMENT 1 , PAR T 2 · JBJS.OR G
proximately 6 to 8 cm from thetibial articular surface of the al-lograft to the distal cut. The widthof the block is 2 cm, and the depthis 2 cm (Fig. 11). We cut on theconservative side and make thecuts slightly larger if necessary, asthese may be trimmed or down-
sized as needed. With use of asmall thin microsagittal saw, theallograft block is harvested fromthe allograft tibia (Fig. 12), withcareful attention so as not to dam-age the allograft patellar tendon(Fig. 13). The proximal bevel or“dovetail” on the allograft boneblock is not created during thispart of the harvest, as it is simpler
to perform once the graft has beenremoved from the allograft tibia.
Once the allograft boneblock has been carefully re-moved from the allograft tibia,we next prepare the bevel, ordovetail, on the proximal aspectof the removed bone block (Fig.
12). This serves two purposes.The first is to lock into the hostnative tibial trough and avoidgraft escape. The second is to al-low a press-fit of the graft intothe native tibia. Using a markingpen (Fig. 13), we draw an angleof 30° to 40° (from the perpen-dicular of the graft) as a beveland cut it carefully with the thin
saw blade. The length of the bevelis approximately 20 to 25 mm(Figs. 14-A through 14-D).
Two number-2 nonabsorb-able sutures are then placed in arunning, locked fashion, as de-scribed by Krackow et al.9, alongthe medial and lateral aspects of
the allograft quadriceps tendon,exiting out proximally. These su-tures are kept long, and they areplaced so that the assistant canapply tension and pull the al-lograft tightly proximally onceit has been secured into the pre-pared tibial bed.
The graft and the proximaltwo sutures are then placed care-
FIG. 14-C FIG. 14-D
Fig. 14-C Posterior aspect. Fig. 14-D Anterior aspect.
-
8/17/2019 Extensor Allograft Technique
10/20
THE J OURNAL OF B ON E & JOINT S URGERY · SURGICAL TECHNIQUES SEPTEMBER 2005 · VOLUME 87-A · SUPPLEMENT 1 , PAR T 2 · JBJS.OR G
fully in a basin on the back table,and attention is turned to thepreparation of the proximal partof the host tibia.
Preparation of the HostProximal Tibial Trough
Using a marking pen, we markout the host proximal tibialtrough (Fig. 15). We typically at-tempt to place the allograft tibialtubercle in a position that is closeto, or slightly medial to, the posi-tion of the native tibial tubercle.In addition, we attempt to leaveat least 15 mm of host bone in-tact below the tibial component
anteriorly to resist proximal mi-gration or escape of the graft, al-though this 15 mm of bone is notalways possible in the revisionsetting with associated bone loss.The rectangular tibial trough isthen marked out for a length of
5 cm and a width of just less than2 cm and a depth of 2 cm. Proxi-mally, the host bone is beveled(Fig. 16) to accept a press-fit ofthe beveled, or dovetailed, allo-graft bone block (Fig. 17). Thisbevel in the host bone should becreated with dimensions slightlysmaller than the allograft boneblock, in order to allow a press-
fit (Fig. 18). Two or three 18-gauge stainless steel wires arethen placed through drill-holesin the tibia from medial to lat-eral (Fig. 19). These wires mustpass deep to the tibial trough. If astemmed tibial component is be-
ing used, it is easier to drill andplace these wires prior to insert-ing the stemmed component.The allograft extensor mecha-nism is then inserted into thehost tibial trough and is gentlypress-fit with a bone tamp orpunch, in an “up and in” fashion,in order to lock the dovetail inplace. The wires are then twisted,
FIG. 15
The host proximal tibial trough is marked. Careful attention to the location of this trough in theregion of the tibial tubercle or slightly medial to it will allow for improved patellar tracking.
CRITICAL CONCEPTS
INDICATIONS:
• Disruption of the extensor
mechanism (extensor lag)
that is not amenable to or
has failed a primary repair
• Patellar tendon rupture, avul-
sion, or prior excision
• Quadriceps tendon rupture,
avulsion, or prior excision
• Patellar fragmentation or
nonreconstructible patellar
fracture
• Severe heterotopic ossification
of the extensor mechanism
• Previous patellectomy with
a total knee arthroplasty
and symptomatic extensor
lag
• Severe patella infera and ar-
throfibrosis of the extensor
mechanism
• Conversion of previous knee
arthrodesis to a total knee
replacement with a fibrosed or
deficient extensor mechanism
continued
-
8/17/2019 Extensor Allograft Technique
11/20
THE J OURNAL OF B ON E & JOINT S URGERY · SURGICAL TECHNIQUES SEPTEMBER 2005 · VOLUME 87-A · SUPPLEMENT 1 , PAR T 2 · JBJS.OR G
FIG. 16
The proximal host tibial trough is also beveled under to allow for a locking fit of the al-
lograft tibial block. A small curet is useful to complete this bevel.
tightened, cut, and bent overagainst bone to avoid irritationto the soft tissues (Fig. 20). Al-ternatively, a small-fragment
cortical screw and washer maybe added to the fixation at thesurgeon’s preference. This cre-ates a drill-hole in the allograft,and we prefer to avoid this stress-riser, despite the added securityof the screw fixation.
Once we have secured theallograft bone into the host tibia,attention is turned to the proxi-
mal quadriceps medial and lat-eral sleeves and retinaculum.
Preparation and Tensioning
of the Host Distal QuadricepsSimilar to the retention suturesplaced in the allograft quadri-ceps, the host distal quadricepsmedial and lateral soft-tissuesleeves are prepared. We again usea number-2 nonabsorbable suture(FiberWire; Arthrex, Naples, Flor-ida) and place a short runningKrakow suture into both the me-
dial and lateral retinaculum in thedistal quadriceps muscle-tendon junction. This allows a secondassistant to “pull down” the hostquadriceps mechanism (Fig. 21),effectively tensioning the distalhost extensor mechanism (Fig.22). The two previously placed
allograft quadriceps sutures arepulled tightly with the knee in fullextension (Figs. 23-A and 23-B).With use of a suture passer, thesesutures are then pulled from distalto proximal, out and up throughthe more proximal host quadri-ceps. This pulls the allograftquadriceps up and under the hostquadriceps, and simultaneouslypulls or tensions the host quadri-
ceps distally (Fig. 24). With thistension maintained, the allograftis then sutured in place beneaththe host quadriceps with number-5 nonabsorbable suture, in a“vest-over-pants” fashion (seeFig. 24). Throughout this suturerepair, the two assistants main-tain tension on their respectiveretention sutures, in order to
CRITICAL CONCEPTS | continued
CONTRAINDICATIONS:
• Ongoing infection or concur-
rent infection of a total knee
replacement at or near the
operative site
• Reconstructible extensor
mechanism with primary
repair or local autogenous
reinforcement tissue
• An unreliable, noncompliant
patient who is unable to co-
operate with postoperative
rehabilitation
continued
-
8/17/2019 Extensor Allograft Technique
12/20
THE J OURNAL OF B ON E & JOINT S URGERY · SURGICAL TECHNIQUES SEPTEMBER 2005 · VOLUME 87-A · SUPPLEMENT 1 , PAR T 2 · JBJS.OR G
FIG. 17
Completed anterior tibial trough, which is ready to accept the allograft extensor mechanism.
FIG. 18
The allograft tibial block is press-fit into the host tibial trough.
-
8/17/2019 Extensor Allograft Technique
13/20
THE J OURNAL OF B ON E & JOINT S URGERY · SURGICAL TECHNIQUES SEPTEMBER 2005 · VOLUME 87-A · SUPPLEMENT 1 , PAR T 2 · JBJS.OR G
FIG. 19
Fixation of the tibial allograft with stainless steel wires, which are drilled through the tibia, beneath the allograft.
FIG. 20
The wire fixation is secured after insertion of the allograft bone into the host tibia.
-
8/17/2019 Extensor Allograft Technique
14/20
THE J OURNAL OF B ON E & JOINT S URGERY · SURGICAL TECHNIQUES SEPTEMBER 2005 · VOLUME 87-A · SUPPLEMENT 1 , PAR T 2 · JBJS.OR G
maintain tension with the kneein the extended position. Oncethe proximal aspect of the al-lograft is secured, the repair iscontinued along the medial andlateral sides. However, the repairis performed with the host reti-
naculum brought over the topof the allograft, in order to coverthe allograft tissues as much aspossible with the medial and lat-eral sleeves of the host retinacu-lum. We find that we are usuallyable to completely cover the al-lograft with these host sleevesthat have been preserved, in ad-dition to suturing the allograft
underneath these tissues (Fig.25). Distally, the host tissues areclosed over the wires and al-lograft bone block.
CLOSURE
We prefer to not flex the knee to
“test” our repair once it is com-pleted. This should be avoided inorder to not stress the repair andattenuate the allograft host junc-tion. The subcutaneous tissuesare closed in routine fashion. Theskin is closed with staples. If theskin over the distal incision istenuous, nonabsorbable suturemay be used.
FIG. 21
Two running, locked Krakow sutures are placed into the medial and lateral host quadri-
ceps retinaculum.
CRITICAL CONCEPTS | continued
PITFALLS:
• A fresh-frozen, nonirradiated
allograft specimen consist-
ing of a quadriceps tendon,
patella, patellar tendon,
and tibial bone is required.
It is preferable to have at
least 5 cm of quadriceps
tendon allograft for suture re-
pair into the host quadriceps
mechanism.
• We recommend use of a mid-
line approach through the ex-
tensor mechanism anteriorly.
Large medial and lateral flapsthat provide excellent tissue
for closure over the extensor
mechanism allograft are devel-
oped. If there is native patella
remaining, this is osteoto-
mized transversely in line with
the midline arthrotomy. The pa-
tellar remnant is then shelled
out and removed.
• Component revision is often
necessary. It is important
that the knee be able to bepassively brought to full ex-
tension with the trial implants
in place, in order to ensure
full extension is attainable
postoperatively.
• It is important that the proxi-
mal aspect of the allograft tib-
ial bone and the bone trough
on the native tibia be dove-
tailed in order to lock, or
press-fit, the allograft into the
native tibia and resist proxi-mal migration.
• When the allograft is su-
tured proximally into the
native quadriceps, tension
must be maintained on the al-
lograft with the knee in full
extension.
continued
-
8/17/2019 Extensor Allograft Technique
15/20
THE J OURNAL OF B ON E & JOINT S URGERY · SURGICAL TECHNIQUES SEPTEMBER 2005 · VOLUME 87-A · SUPPLEMENT 1 , PAR T 2 · JBJS.OR G
POSTOPERATIVE CARE AND
REHABILITATION
In the operating room at thecompletion of the procedure, theknee is placed in full extension.We prefer to use a knee immobi-lizer that is customized to the sizeand diameter of the extremity.
This allows for complete immo-bilization of the knee in full ex-tension and permits access to thewound postoperatively. A poor-fitting brace allows for flexionand movement, which should beavoided in the immediate post-operative period. Alternatively,a cylindrical fiberglass cast maybe placed on the limb in the op-
CRITICAL CONCEPTS | continued
• It is not desirable to have
an overly long allograft quadri-
ceps tendon. A segment that
is too long will end up being
sewn proximally into the rec-
tus femoris muscle instead
of into the host quadriceps
tendon.
• The host retinaculum medial
and lateral flaps should be
sewn over the allograft as
much as possible in order to
cover the allograft.
• The knee should not be flexed
intraoperatively to assess the
flexion of the construct. The
patient is managed with immo-
bilization of the knee in full ex-
tension with touch-down
weight-bearing for eight weeks,
and then a directed physical
therapy program is begun.
• The allograft patella is not re-
surfaced in order to avoid cre-
ating a stress-riser in it.
continued
FIG. 23-A
Two sutures placed in the allograft quadriceps allow the allograft to be tensioned proximally.
FIG. 22
These two sutures allow the host extensor mechanism to be tensioned by pulling distally.
-
8/17/2019 Extensor Allograft Technique
16/20
THE J OURNAL OF B ON E & JOINT S URGERY · SURGICAL TECHNIQUES SEPTEMBER 2005 · VOLUME 87-A · SUPPLEMENT 1 , PAR T 2 · JBJS.OR G
FIG. 23-B
The host extensor mechanism and allograft are pulled by two separate assistants into an extension position.
FIG. 24
The sutures in the allograft quadriceps are pulled under the host quadriceps and out proximally through the host extensor mechanism.
-
8/17/2019 Extensor Allograft Technique
17/20
THE J OURNAL OF B ON E & JOINT S URGERY · SURGICAL TECHNIQUES SEPTEMBER 2005 · VOLUME 87-A · SUPPLEMENT 1 , PAR T 2 · JBJS.OR G
erating room. The disadvantageof the cast is that it must be re-moved if there are concernsabout the wound and in orderto change the dressing postoper-atively. In a patient with border-line compliance, this is the safestform of immobilization, but it isoften poorly tolerated.
Postoperative physical ther-apy follows a protocol that we
developed for this procedure.Patients are maintained with theknee in full extension for eightweeks after surgery. During thisperiod, we allow touch-downweight-bearing only. We have thepatient avoid full weight-bearingin order to reduce the quadri-ceps force on the tibial tubercleand the allograft-host soft-tissue
repair. We do not allow any flex-ion during this eight-week pe-riod. We encourage isometricstatic quadriceps contractions.After eight weeks, 30° of active
flexion is permitted, under thesupervision of a physical thera-pist, with the patient wearing ahinged knee brace with a lock-out against further flexion. Simi-
FIG. 25
The host medial and lateral sleeves of retinaculum, if preserved during the surgery, serve to cover the allograft completely, reducing the ex-
posure of the allograft to the subcutaneous tissues.
CRITICAL CONCEPTS | continued
AUTHOR UPDATE:
This technique has not been modified since the publication of our original
study. We emphasize that success with this technique requires that several
critical aspects be carefully followed. The midline incision and retention ofhost medial and lateral retinacular tissue is important. Removing the patel-
lar remnant in this way ensures that medial and lateral flaps remain for
closure, and it improves exposure. Tensioning the allograft tightly in full ex-
tension is necessary to help to reduce the risk of allograft attenuation and
extensor lag. Closure of the medial and lateral flaps over the allograft as
much as possible reduces the contact of the allograft with subcutaneous
tissues and, we believe, reduces the risk of infection. We emphasize that
we do not flex the repair once it is completed, as has been recommended
by other authors.
-
8/17/2019 Extensor Allograft Technique
18/20
THE J OURNAL OF B ON E & JOINT S URGERY · SURGICAL TECHNIQUES SEPTEMBER 2005 · VOLUME 87-A · SUPPLEMENT 1 , PAR T 2 · JBJS.OR G
Figs. 26-A, 26-B, and 26-C Preoperative radiographs showing a patient with a deficient extensor mechanism (patellar tendon atten-
uation) and component malrotation with lateral dislocation of the host extensor mechanism.
FIG. 26-C
FIG. 26-A FIG. 26-B
-
8/17/2019 Extensor Allograft Technique
19/20
THE J OURNAL OF B ON E & JOINT S URGERY · SURGICAL TECHNIQUES SEPTEMBER 2005 · VOLUME 87-A · SUPPLEMENT 1 , PAR T 2 · JBJS.OR G
Figs. 26-D, 26-E, and 26-F Radiographs made after component revision and reconstruction with an extensor mechanism allograft.
FIG. 26-D
FIG. 26-E
FIG. 26-F
-
8/17/2019 Extensor Allograft Technique
20/20
THE J OURNAL OF B ON E & JOINT S URGERY · SURGICAL TECHNIQUES SEPTEMBER 2005 · VOLUME 87-A · SUPPLEMENT 1 , PAR T 2 · JBJS.OR G
larly, at eight weeks, patients areadvanced to weight-bearing astolerated. During weight-bearing,we lock the brace in full exten-sion. At twelve weeks, we allowfurther active flexion up to amaximum of 90°, and gentlequadriceps strengthening exer-cises are initiated. Passive flexionis not permitted in order to min-imize the chance of graft failureand early attenuation. Patientsare evaluated at six months andthen on a yearly basis (Figs. 26-Athrough 26-F).
NOTE: The authors thank Regina M. Barden, RN, and Marga-ret Arp for their contribution to the preparation and clinicalsupport for this study.
R. Stephen J. Burnett, MD, FRCS(C)
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Barnes
Jewish Hosp ital , Washington Univer sity, 660
South Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8233,
St. Louis, MO 63110. E-mail address:
Richard A. Berger, MD
Craig J. Della Valle, MD
Scott M. Sporer, MD
Joshua J. Jacobs, MDWayne G. Paprosky, MD
Aaron G. Rosenberg, MD
Rush University Medical Center, Midwest Ortho-
paedics, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 1063,
Chicago, IL 60612
In support of their research or preparation of thismanuscript, one or more of the authors received
grants or outside funding from Zimmer. In addi-
tion, one or more of the authors received pay-
ments or other benefits or a commitment or
agreement to provide such benefits from a com-
mercial entity (Zimmer). Also, a commercial entity
(Zimmer) paid or directed, or agreed to pay or
direct, benefits to a research fund, foundation,
educational institution, or other charitable or non-
profit organization with which the authors are affil-
iated or associated.
The line drawings in this article are the work of
Jennifer Fairman ([email protected]).
doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00442
REFERENCES1. Leopold SS, Greidanus N, Paprosky
WG, Berger RA, Rosenberg AG. High rate
of failure of allograft reconstruction of
the extensor mechanism after total knee
arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;
81:1574-9.
2. Emerson RH Jr, Head WC, Malinin TI. Re-
construction of patellar tendon rupture aftertotal knee arthroplasty with an extensor
mechanism allograft. Clin Orthop Relat Res.
1990;260:154-61.
3. Emerson RH Jr, Head WC, Malinin TI. Ex-
tensor mechanism reconstruction with an
allograft after total knee arthroplasty. Clin
Orthop Relat Res. 1994;303:79-85.
4. Nazarian DG, Booth RE Jr. Extensor mecha-
nism allografts in total knee arthroplasty. Clin
Orthop Relat Res. 1999;367:123-9.
5. Burnett RS, Fornasier VL, Haydon CM, We-
hrli BM, Whitewood CN, Bourne RB. Retrieval
of a well-functioning extensor mechanism al-
lograft from a total knee arthroplasty. Clinical
and histological findings. J Bone Joint Surg
Br. 2004;86:986-90.
6. Burnett RS, Berger RA, Paprosky WG, Della
Valle CJ, Jacobs JJ, Rosenberg AG. Extensor
mechanism allograft reconstruction after to-
tal knee arthroplasty. A comparison of twotechniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;
86:2694-9.
7. Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash
HE. Malrotation causing patellofemoral com-
plications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin
Orthop Relat Res. 1998;356:144-53.
8. Crossett LS, Sinha RK, Sechriest VF,
Rubash HE. Reconstruction of a ruptured pa-
tellar tendon with achilles tendon allograft
following total knee ar throplasty. J Bone Joint
Surg Am. 2002;84:1354-61.
9. Krackow KA, Thomas SC, Jones LC. Liga-
ment-tendon fixation analysis of a new stitch
and comparison with standard techniques.Orthopedics. 1988;11:909-17.