extrapolation of rating curve

30
H Y D R O L O G Y P R O JE C T Technical Assistance EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE • WHY: GAUGING DOES NOT COVER FULL RANGE OF FLOW CALIBRATION AT HIGH FLOW IS DIFFICULT: * OCCURS INFREQUENTLY * SHORT DURATION AT HIGH STAGES A DIFFERENT CONTROL MAY EXIST (FLOODPLAIN, DIFFERENT ROUGHNESS) • WHERE: – EXTRAPOLATION AT STATE DATA PROCESSING CENTRE OHS - 1

Upload: alaula

Post on 11-Jan-2016

112 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE. WHY: GAUGING DOES NOT COVER FULL RANGE OF FLOW CALIBRATION AT HIGH FLOW IS DIFFICULT: OCCURS INFREQUENTLY SHORT DURATION AT HIGH STAGES A DIFFERENT CONTROL MAY EXIST (FLOODPLAIN, DIFFERENT ROUGHNESS) WHERE: EXTRAPOLATION AT STATE DATA PROCESSING CENTRE. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE

HYDROLOGY PROJECTTechnical Assistance

EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE

• WHY:– GAUGING DOES NOT COVER FULL RANGE OF

FLOW

– CALIBRATION AT HIGH FLOW IS DIFFICULT:* OCCURS INFREQUENTLY

* SHORT DURATION

– AT HIGH STAGES A DIFFERENT CONTROL MAY EXIST (FLOODPLAIN, DIFFERENT ROUGHNESS)

• WHERE:– EXTRAPOLATION AT STATE DATA

PROCESSING CENTRE

OHS - 1

Page 2: EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE

HYDROLOGY PROJECTTechnical Assistance

HIGH FLOW EXTRAPOLATION

• METHODS:

– DOUBLE LOG PLOT METHOD

– STAGE-AREA/STAGE-VELOCITY METHOD

– THE MANNING’S EQUATION APPROACH

– THE CONVEYANCE SLOPE METHOD

OHS - 2

Page 3: EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE

HYDROLOGY PROJECTTechnical Assistance

DOUBLE LOG PLOT METHOD

• CONDITIONS:– HYDRAULIC AND GEOMETRIC

CHARACTERISTICS DO NOT CHANGE BEYOND MEASURED RANGE

• IMPLICATION:– POWER TYPE RATING CURVE FITTED TO THE

LAST (HIGHEST) SEGMENT WILL BE CONSIDERED APPLICABLE TO EXTRAPOLATED RANGE AS WELL

OHS - 3

Page 4: EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE

HYDROLOGY PROJECTTechnical Assistance

X-SECTION KHAMGAON, 1997

OHS - 4

Page 5: EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE

HYDROLOGY PROJECTTechnical AssistanceOHS - 5

Page 6: EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE

HYDROLOGY PROJECTTechnical Assistance

STAGE-AREA/STAGE-VELOCITY METHOD

• USE:– TO EXTRAPOLATE RATING CURVE BEYOND

MEASURED RANGE BASED ON:* MEASURED STAGE-X-SECTIONAL AREA RELATION

* EXTRAPOLATED STAGE-VELOCITY PLOT

• NOTE:– ASSUMPTION IS THAT STAGE-VELOCITY PLOT

CAN EASILY BE EXTRAPOLATED SINCE RATE OF INCREASE OF VELOCITY AT HIGHER STAGES DIMINISHES RAPIDLY

– FROM A HYDRAULIC POINT OF VIEW ASSUMPTION DOUBTFULL SINCE U::R^2/3

OHS - 6

Page 7: EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE

HYDROLOGY PROJECTTechnical Assistance

ILLUSTRATION OF STAGE-AREA/STAGE-VELOCITY

METHOD

OHS - 7

Page 8: EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE

HYDROLOGY PROJECTTechnical Assistance

MANNING’S EQUATION METHOD

METHOD– K* = f(h) PLOTTED

FROM DISCHARGE MEASUREMENTS

– K* BECOMES APPROX. CONSTANT FOR h>>

– K* WITH Ar AND Rr FROM MEASUREMENTS EXTRAPOLATED

– FLOOD PLAIN TREATED BY MANNING EQUATION

– S CAN BE ESTIMATED FROM TOPOSHEETS

2/13/2 SRKu m

3/2*

3/2*

2/1*

R

uK

RKu

SKK m

fpriver

fpfpfpmfp

rrriver

QQQ

SRAKQ

RAKQ

2/1

,

3/2*

OHS - 8

Page 9: EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE

HYDROLOGY PROJECTTechnical Assistance

MANNING’S EQUATION METHOD

OHS - 9

Page 10: EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE

HYDROLOGY PROJECTTechnical AssistanceOHS - 10

Page 11: EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE

HYDROLOGY PROJECTTechnical AssistanceOHS - 11

Page 12: EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE

HYDROLOGY PROJECTTechnical AssistanceOHS - 12

Page 13: EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE

HYDROLOGY PROJECTTechnical Assistance

CONVEYANCE-SLOPE METHOD

• METHOD:– CONVEYANCE AND

ENERGY SLOPE ARE EXTRAPOLATED SEPARATELY

– A AND R FROM FIELD SURVEY

– Km ESTIMATED IN FIELD

– K EXTRAPOLATED

– S FOLLOWS FROM (Q/K)2 VERSUS h

– EXISTING S-TENDENCY EXTRAPOLATED

3/2

2/1

2/13/2

ARKK

with

KSQ

or

SARKQ

m

m

OHS - 13

Page 14: EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE

HYDROLOGY PROJECTTechnical AssistanceOHS - 14

Page 15: EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE

HYDROLOGY PROJECTTechnical AssistanceOHS - 15

Page 16: EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE

HYDROLOGY PROJECTTechnical Assistance

INTERPRETATION OF WETTED PERIMETER

FLOOD PLAINRIVER

OHS - 16

Page 17: EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE

HYDROLOGY PROJECTTechnical Assistance

EXTRAPOLATION WITH HYMOS

• FIRST:– COMPUATATION OF GEOMETRIC AND

HYDRAULIC QUANTITIES IN MEASRED RANGE

• NEXT:– PLOT OF FOLLOWING PARAMETERS AS f(h)

* SURFACE WIDTH

* WETTED PERIMETER

* X-SECTIONAL AREA

* HYDRAULIC RADIUS

* AR2/3, Q, u, conveyance K, AND S

• FINALLY:– K EXTRAPOLATED AND S ASYMPTOTICALLY

EQUAL TO BEDSLOPE: Q = KS1/2 OHS - 17

Page 18: EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE

HYDROLOGY PROJECTTechnical AssistanceOHS - 18

Page 19: EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE

HYDROLOGY PROJECTTechnical AssistanceOHS - 19

Page 20: EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE

HYDROLOGY PROJECTTechnical AssistanceOHS - 20

Page 21: EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE

HYDROLOGY PROJECTTechnical AssistanceOHS - 21

Page 22: EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE

HYDROLOGY PROJECTTechnical AssistanceOHS - 22

Page 23: EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE

HYDROLOGY PROJECTTechnical AssistanceOHS - 23

Page 24: EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE

HYDROLOGY PROJECTTechnical AssistanceOHS - 24

Page 25: EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE

HYDROLOGY PROJECTTechnical AssistanceOHS - 25

Page 26: EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE

HYDROLOGY PROJECTTechnical AssistanceOHS - 26

Page 27: EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE

HYDROLOGY PROJECTTechnical Assistance

Computation of cross-sectional parameters

Station : KHAMGAON Date : 1997 1 1

Section 1

Left bound -160.00 m, right bound .00 m from initial point Water boundaries included

K-Manning: 30.0, Sqrt(S).K-Manning: .4135

Stage Width Wetted Area Hydraulic A*R**2/3 Q Perimeter radius m m m sq-m m m**(8/3) m3/s

516.00 .000 .000 .000 .000 .00 .00 516.50 .000 .000 .000 .000 .00 .00 517.00 7.143 7.738 .715 .092 .15 .06 517.50 19.545 20.182 7.605 .377 3.97 1.64 518.00 45.568 46.233 25.858 .559 17.55 7.26 518.50 102.278 102.988 60.973 .592 42.99 17.78 519.00 106.139 106.976 113.077 1.057 117.34 48.52 519.50 121.428 122.344 168.385 1.376 208.34 86.16 520.00 125.143 126.195 230.063 1.823 343.33 141.98 520.50 128.714 129.903 293.527 2.260 505.44 209.01 521.00 142.500 143.755 360.636 2.509 665.84 275.34

OHS - 27

Page 28: EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE

HYDROLOGY PROJECTTechnical Assistance

Section 2

Left bound .00 m, right bound 220.00 m from initial point Water boundaries included

K-Manning: 40.0, Sqrt(S).K-Manning: .5514

Stage Width Wetted Area Hydraulic A*R**2/3 Q Perimeter radius m m m sq-m m m**(8/3) m3/s

516.00 205.888 207.247 999.412 4.822 2852.65 1572.84 516.50 218.718 220.220 1106.445 5.024 3245.72 1789.57 517.00 220.000 222.033 1216.253 5.478 3779.44 2083.84 517.50 220.000 223.033 1326.253 5.946 4353.09 2400.13 518.00 220.000 224.033 1436.253 6.411 4956.52 2732.84 518.50 220.000 225.033 1546.253 6.871 5588.60 3081.34 519.00 220.000 226.033 1656.253 7.327 6248.32 3445.08 519.50 220.000 227.033 1766.253 7.780 6934.71 3823.54 520.00 220.000 228.033 1876.253 8.228 7646.93 4216.23 520.50 220.000 229.033 1986.253 8.672 8384.14 4622.70 521.00 220.000 230.033 2096.253 9.113 9145.61 5042.54

OHS - 28

Page 29: EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE

HYDROLOGY PROJECTTechnical Assistance

Section 3

Left bound 220.00 m, right bound 420.00 m from initial point Water boundaries included

K-Manning: 30.0, Sqrt(S).K-Manning: .4135

Stage Width Wetted Area Hydraulic A*R**2/3 Q Perimeter radius m m m sq-m m m**(8/3) m3/s

516.00 .000 .000 .000 .000 .00 .00 516.50 2.222 2.741 .300 .110 .07 .03 517.00 6.337 6.975 2.440 .350 1.21 .50 517.50 36.820 37.559 8.071 .215 2.90 1.20 518.00 72.393 73.180 39.330 .537 26.00 10.75 518.50 77.712 78.592 76.856 .978 75.72 31.31 519.00 110.209 111.137 121.607 1.094 129.13 53.40 519.50 132.517 133.496 180.508 1.352 220.72 91.27 520.00 144.521 145.595 251.050 1.724 361.00 149.28 520.50 147.822 149.043 324.136 2.175 544.09 224.99 521.00 177.389 178.710 401.567 2.247 688.91 284.88

Stage Discharge/section >>> Total Discharge 516.00 .00 1572.84 .00 1572.84 516.50 .00 1789.57 .03 1789.60 517.00 .06 2083.84 .50 2084.40 517.50 1.64 2400.13 1.20 2402.97 518.00 7.26 2732.84 10.75 2750.84 518.50 17.78 3081.34 31.31 3130.43 519.00 48.52 3445.08 53.40 3547.00 519.50 86.16 3823.54 91.27 4000.97 520.00 141.98 4216.23 149.28 4507.48 520.50 209.01 4622.70 224.99 5056.70 521.00 275.34 5042.54 284.88 5602.76

OHS - 29

Page 30: EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE

HYDROLOGY PROJECTTechnical AssistanceOHS - 30