(f 20msust10. engineering, in . 1981 calvert cliffs ii pef

7
, O (f 20MSUST10. ENGINEERING, IN . . ? 1981 CALVERT CLIFFS II PEF;'ELING OUTAGE END OF CYCLE 3 EDDY CURRENT INSPECTION RESULTS ON CONTROL ELEMENT ASSEMBLIES (CEA's) . .. CEN-154 (B)-NP * . '. MARCH 5, 1981 01170 3 8

Upload: others

Post on 14-Jul-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: (f 20MSUST10. ENGINEERING, IN . 1981 CALVERT CLIFFS II PEF

,

O

(f 20MSUST10. ENGINEERING, IN ..

?

1981 CALVERT CLIFFS II PEF;'ELING OUTAGE

END OF CYCLE 3 EDDY CURRENT INSPECTION

RESULTS ON CONTROL ELEMENT ASSEMBLIES (CEA's)

. ..

CEN-154 (B)-NP

*.

'.

MARCH 5, 1981

01170 3 8

Page 2: (f 20MSUST10. ENGINEERING, IN . 1981 CALVERT CLIFFS II PEF

LEGAL NOTICE.

THIS REPORT .VAS PREPARED AS AN ACCOUNT OF WORK SPONSOREDBY COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC. NEITHER COMBUSTION ENGINEERINGNOR ANY PERSON ACTING ON ITS BEHALF: ,

'

- .

A. MAKES ANY WARRANTY OR R EPR ES ENT ATION, EXPRESS ORIMPLIED INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF F#TNESS FOR A P* RTICULAR

PURPOSE OR ME R CH AN T A BI LIT Y. WITH n';S PE CT TO 1HE ACCURACY,

COMPLETENESS, CR USEFULNESS OF THE INFORMAT'ON CC''T AINED IN THISREPORT, OR TH AT T HE USE O F AN Y INF ORMATIOrs, APP AR ATUS, *.'.E T HOD, '.

OR PROCESS DISCLOSED IN THIS REPORT MAY Nf]T INF RINGE PRIVATELYOWNED RIGHTS;CR

E. ASSUMES ANY LI ABILITIE3 'AITH RESPECT TO THL USE OF. On FORDAMAGES RESULTING FRCM THE USE OF, ANY INFORf.1ATION, APPAR ATUS.METHOD OR FROCESS DISCLOSED IN This REFORT.

. .,

Page 3: (f 20MSUST10. ENGINEERING, IN . 1981 CALVERT CLIFFS II PEF

.

A. CEA EDDY CURRE."T TEST RESULTS,

were eddy current tested during the Calvert'

C iffs II EGC-3 refueling outage in January, 1981. The CEA's resided in

tle core positicns shown in Figure 1 and had been eddy current testedf llowing Cycle 2 (Ref.1). The purpose of the eddy current inspecticns was

tolocateandquantifypotentialwearatthe( .

,

d

The testing was performed in accordance with approved C-E procedures for

the detection of CEA wear. The, of each CEA finger was in-

spected with an encircling eddy current coi!.

--

At E0C-3, sli;,nt indications of wear were observedThe eddy current data collected en could not be interpreted

, ,

with any certainty due to electronic and mechanical equipment problemsencountered during the inspection activity at the site. Consequen.ly no

data are presented for tnis CEA.

Thesignalf I from these CEA's are summarized inJ

Table 1. In order to cetermine the magnitude of wear associated witn a given

signal,the signal in each case must be compared to signals obtained, ,

from testing a standard with wear simulations of known size and gecmetry. A

description of the wear standard, used in t.his progran, and the correspondingsignall .easured at ECC-3 is presented in Table 2. !!ote that the signal

~~ e. ~

depends' upon thE.

i

l *

Thestandardusedinthisprogramconsistsoff~

L

and wa: the same standard used in. .

the EOC-2 measurements at Calvert Cliffs II.

I 'of the average indicated wear following Cjcle 3 rangesThe [ ] . -r

from CEAl also exhibitsL -> .

.- tne maximum wear signal of which correspcnds to a wear value of

approximately }

Page 4: (f 20MSUST10. ENGINEERING, IN . 1981 CALVERT CLIFFS II PEF

Measurements on the scme fingers at EOC-2 showed

as measured after Cycle 3 considering the estimated overall measurementuncertainty of the CEA eddy current test system. After Cycle 3

, , ,

the maximum signal was found in the Af t .- Cvele 2 the,

approximatewearestimatewasi while at EOC-3 the approximate-'

L -.

wear e.wimate was for this indication. It should be added i,

that comparison of data between different inspection programs.must be basedupon Equipment can vary

'

from one test series to another resulting' in different ~'

.

.

The degree of wear measured in the CEA's at EOC-3 is acceptable for.

continued CEA operation since the measured wear is less than. .

(Ref. 2).

B. VISUAL INSPECTION' ~

The lower of was visually inspected by TY. No anomalies'

were observed on any finger and no perceptible diameter variations were.

observed at any of the wear locations.

REFERENCES - ..

1. "Results of the CEA Guide Tube Inspection Program, Calvert Cliffs Unit #2Docket No. 50-318", CEN-118 (B)-P, November 8, 1979

2. " Response to Request for Additional Information, CEA Guide Tube

Inspection Program, Calvert Cliffs Unit No. 2, Docket No. 50-313",CEN-116 (B)-P, dated October 8, 1979.

.

e

.

Page 5: (f 20MSUST10. ENGINEERING, IN . 1981 CALVERT CLIFFS II PEF

TABLE 1

CALVERT CLIFFS II END-OF-CYCLE 3 CEA 'n' EAR TEST RESULTS

APPROXIF. ATE LOCATION,

CEA NO. FINGER RESULTS_

(It'CHES FROM CEA BOTTOM)

.

9.

b

e

S

Page 6: (f 20MSUST10. ENGINEERING, IN . 1981 CALVERT CLIFFS II PEF

.

TABLE 2

*

~ CORRELATION: EDDY CURREriT TEST STANDARD SICNfsL lVS. WEAR

. .

WEAR STANDARD (INCONEL 625 TUBING).

WEAR SIMULATION AVERAGE ...

SIGNAL.

, .

-_

,

.

. ..

*CORRELATIONS APPLY TO CALVERT CLIFFS II EOC-3 INSPECTIC!4 DNLY

.

* 6

Page 7: (f 20MSUST10. ENGINEERING, IN . 1981 CALVERT CLIFFS II PEF

.- - ,

.

.

CORE LOCATIONS OF CEA's DURITIG ChCLES 1 TilRU 3 FOR CEA'S TilAT WERE EDDY CURREilT TESTED AFT.R CYCL.ES 2 AfiL' 3FIGURL 1.

.