CERTH-HIT

FUTUREMED KoM, Rome, 19-20/7/2012

FUTUREMED WP5

Projet cofinancé par le Fonds Européen de Développement Régional

Project cofinanced by the European Regional Development Fund

Contents

Key Objectives & Role of WP5 within the project (p.3 –p5)

Overall WP5 Structure (P6 – P8) Key Outputs – expected results (p9 –

p16) Organization of work in WP5 phases

(p17 – P29)

WP5 objective

…..to implement an interoperable management information system that will make Med Ports more attractive by:

• removing current bottlenecks • making passenger and goods transport

flows smoother and swiffer• increasing interaction between port

operators, customers and stakeholders• integrating the currently fragmented

information on ports characteristics, activities and specialisation

…FutureMed promised…

Interoperable information systems, which

a) integrate port systems with inland logistics infrastructures (e.g. dryports) and with transport and service operators

b) will make benefit of the existing national ICT platforms and will be finalized to define the blueprint of an integrated one-stop-shop system transferable to all the MED area, composed of a specialized freight transport management system and a specialized passenger and touristic management system.

Specific applications to be developed:

1. a dynamic system for the real-time management of freight and passenger flows, aiming at identifying actions to remove congestion and bottlenecks in the interface between ports and related territories (specifically ports included in cities).

2. solutions to digitalize intra-EU port-to-port and port-to-operators communications related to bureaucratic duties (e.g. Customs).

3. solutions to enable visibility along the transport chain for the operators.

4. solutions for specific supply chains (e.g. agro-food).

WP 1: Project Management

WP 2 : Disseminati

on

WP3 -Capitalisation Platform

Observatory

The FUTUREMED concept

Conferences

Training Seminars

Webplatform

PractitionerWS

Road show with Show

cases

Round Tables

WP5 –To improve Information Management

VisibilityPlatform(3)

Single windowPlatform (2)

Port Hinterland

Pilot(a)

Cruisepilot

passenger-freight

infomobilityPilot (1)

WP6 –Reduction of externalitiesAdria-

West Medpilot

6 Stakeholders Platforms

Agro-food Supply Chainpilot

WP 5 Structure

5.1 Assessment of operational ICT gaps for customs compliance

5.2 Development of SW Platform for customs compliance

5.3 Requirements assessment for intermodal chains visibility

5.4 Development of Intermodal Chain Visibility Platform

5.5 Pilots Implementation and Development

Budget allocation to WP5 phases

WP5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5

Staff costs € 898.253 € 198.833 € 142.000 € 150.737 € 135.426 € 271.257

Durable goods € 133.500 € 56.500 € 21.500 € 18.500 € - € 37.000

Consumable goods € 10.300 € 3.100 € 3.050 € 1.550 € 1.550 € 1.050

Travel € 88.300 € 17.700 € 7.500 € 10.800 € 5.000 € 47.300

Services € 53.130 € 9.000 € 11.000 € 6.500 € 1.000 € 25.630

External expertise € 629.674 € 112.000 € 82.200 € 47.691 € 100.500 € 287.283

Promotion € 44.630 € 4.000 € 1.500 € 13.230 € 1.900 € 24.000

Overheads € 115.542 € 33.922 € 18.011 € 17.035 € 16.858 € 29.716

TOTAL € 1.973.329 € 435.055 € 286.761 € 266.043 € 262.234 € 723.236

Budget allocation to WP5 phases

PARTNER Country WP 5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5PLAZA SP 16% 27% 17% 21% 19% 5%

ZLC SP 10% 15% 11% 9% 8% 9%

VPF SP 10% 3% 3% 4% 18% 16%

CERTH GR 9% 7% 9% 11% 8% 9%

BSC SL 7% 9% 7% 6% 10% 5%

THPA GR 6% 10% 6% 8% 2% 5%

ITL IT 6% 1% 4% 4% 4% 12%

APOLBIA IT 6% 1% 10% 2% 11% 7%

CCEIA CY 6% 8% 4% 11% 4% 3%

APCivitavecchia IT 5% 1% 0% 1% 1% 12%

MINTRAGR GR 4% 1% 9% 3% 11% 2%

LAZIO REGION IT 4% 2% 0% 2% 0% 9%

TRAINOSE GR 4% 0% 16% 3% 0% 3%

AFT FR 4% 7% 3% 4% 3% 2%

FVG IT 2% 3% 0% 4% 0% 2%

UNIMB SL 2% 4% 0% 7% 0% 0%

WP 5 outputsPlatforms and IT systems Single Window Platform (WP5)… single window platform

for customs processes facilitation Chain visibility Platform (WP5)… an “interoperability

enabling” platform that mix the technical and the community dimension of the transport chain operation within the infrastructure of the platform

Reports1. SW Customs service Report2. Customs SW Services Action Plan3. Document Centric interoperability Framework4. Demonstration Cases Communication Plan5. Administration Community Awareness Plan6. Technical Assessment Report7. Business Assessment Report

OthersIT Systems implementation at pilots

The Single Window platformThe requirement Import Control System (ICS): requirement to handle pre-

arrival information (EC Customs Code amendment) ICS is to provide the basis for risk-based input controls on

goods arriving from third countries into the EU Pre-arrival information to be provided by submitting an

entry summary declaration (ENS).

The problem each EU customs authority has defined national

specifications for the ENS submission thus creating to the private actors of transport industry sector a burden of complying with different specification of the Customs authorities involved

Compliance to National specifications

The “new” trends Blue Belt Modernized Customs Code

The Single Window platform

Customs Country A

Customs Country B

Customs Country X

ENS

ENS

ENS

SW Platform

1 ENS format

OceanCarrier

FreightForwarder

Health InspectingAuthority A

Health InspectingAuthority B

Health InspectingAuthorityX

National

specs

message

1 message format

OceanCarrier

FreightForwarder

Potentialcontent extension

National specs

message

National specs message

The Visibility platformThe problem Complexity of multimodal freight transport info exchange :

• lack of interoperability along supply chain

• need for provision of information several times for different purposes

• lack of information on multimodal availabilities

• lack of integration of information from tracking and tracing technologies and intelligent cargo applications

inefficiencies, costs, reduced visibility of freight, perceived complexity for multimodal transport, sub-exploitation of multimodal transport, non-optimized use of existing transport infrastructure….

The requirement A governances Platform managing critical information for chain

efficiency (example work on Single Transport Document promotion or port

community centered info pipeline achievement) Strong involvement of the freight community and individuals

(through the FMed Observatory and National Stakeholders Platforms)Sharing of information requires trust and co-operation

Co-operation requires interoperability

Interoperability requires standardised solutions

the challenges: global dimension; negotiability; trust and data security; liability…..

ShipperRailwayterminal Train Port Sea Port Sea Port Truck Retailer

Port of Loading Port of Discharge Point of DestinationPoint of Origin

Secured content

& closing

of contain

er

Advanced notification

for regulation

compliance

Container & cargo Integrity during transit

Inspection/Risk

assessment

Container clearance

Shipment order

Cargo consolidation

Routing Planning

/rescheduling

Updates on Estimated

time of arrival

Exception handling at terminals

Routing Planning

/rescheduling

Proof of Delivery

• Information Flow should match Physical flow for efficient chain management

• Common information for regulation compliance and chain management processes

Visibility for regulation compliance &

efficiency

Information pipeline(s)

Point L

CPoint D

OL

DLlocaldistr

TSP1

TSP2

TSP3

Point T

Where:

Origin Location (OL) TSP1 Point of Loading (Point L) TSP2Transhipping Point (Point T) TSP2Point of Discharge (Point D) TSP2Customs (C) TSP3Local Distribution Center (localdistr) TSP3Destination Location (DL) TSP3

Interoperability for visibility

Existing Interoperability Islands

Big players SMEs Big players SMEs PortsPorts

Networked Freight Community

Connectivity Layer

Interconnectivity for visibility

• Network of Port Communities systems

• Capturing of status information from different sources

• Port hinterland efficient interface

WP 5 outputs & project pilots

PLAZA ZLC FVP

BSC UM

Civitavecchia Port

Interporte di Ore

Lazio Region

N. Sardenia Port

FVPFVG

ITL

Single WindowPlatform

• Requirements assessment

• Platform development

• Pilot testing Chain Visibility Platform

• Requirements assessment

• Platform development

• Pilot testing

MoITN

CERTH

ThPA

TrainOSE

AFT

Maribor Univ

CCEIA

P 1: Spanish port-hinterland information system

P 2: AdriaWestMed

P 3: Strengthening the Med cruise tourism

P 4: Agro-food supply chain pilot

P 5: Passenger & freight infomobilityNon-pilot partners/testing community

reqsdevelopment

testing

reqsdevelopment

testing

reqs

reqs

Phase 5.1 Assessment of operational ICT gaps for customs compliance (1/2)

•Actors (ports, industry, customs) requirements identifications (surveys,experts meetings, biblio)

•Requirements prioritization (eg DELPHI with experts)

Step1 : Capturing actors needs

•Overview of existing systems with particular emphasis on Med Port System

•Current trends (Blue Belt, MCC, ..)

Step2 : Existing systems and trends

•SW

servi

ces-f

uncti

ons•Cooperati

ve

archit

ect

ure

wit

h

exi

sti

ng

syst

ems

Step3 : SW services for MED ports System

Step4 : Public Consultation

Step5 : MED Custom SW Service Action Plan

in 6 MED countries

Phase 5.1 Assessment of operational ICT gaps for customs compliance (2/2)

PARTNER Country

Actors needs identificationExisting systems mapping

SW services for MED ports System

Public Consultation

MED Custom SW Service Action Plan

Ports Industry Customs/ Authorities

LAZIO REGION IT × ×

APCivitavecchia IT ×

FVG IT ×

ITL IT ×

APOLBIA IT ×

MINTRAGR GR × ×

CERTH GR × × THPA GR ×

TRAINOSE GR

PLAZA SP × ×

ZLC SP ×

VPF SP × ×

AFT FR × ×

UNIMB SL × ×

BSC SL ×

CCEIA CY × ×

Observatory Members × × × ×

Phase 5.2 Development of a single Window Platform for customs compliance (1/2)

Stakeholders validation

SW PT v1

Stakeholders validation

SW PT v2

SW Platform

Cooperation with 6.2

PARTNER Platform Development

Service Validation&

Pilot Interfaces development

LAZIO REGION

APCivitavecchia

FVG

ITL × APOLBIA × MINTRAGR × CERTH × THPA × TRAINOSE × PLAZA × ZLC × VPF × AFT × UNIMB

BSC × CCEIA ×

Phase 5.2 Development of a single Window Platform for customs compliance (2/2)

Phase 5.3: Requirements assessment for intermodal chain visibility

(Document Centric) Interoperability Framework

SC actorsview

Gap analysis

Existing e-logistics solutions

B2B B2A/A2B

Liaison with Stakeholders’ Pt

EU projects (FP,MED)National projects

Business solutions-COTS

PARTNER E-logistics solutions mapping

Gap analysis Document centric

interoperability framework

System Architecture

LAZIO REGION X X

APCivitavecchia X X

FVG X X

ITL X X

APOLBIA X X X

MINTRAGR X X

CERTH X X

THPA X X

TRAINOSE X X

PLAZA X X

ZLC X X

VPF X X X

AFT X X

UNIMB X

BSC X

CCEIA X

Phase 5.3 Requirements assessment for intermodal chains visibility

Phase 5.4: Development of the intermodal chain visibility platform

System architecture

(5.3)

Pilots priorities &

infrastructure mapping

Visibility solutions design

Platform InfrastructureDevelopment

(interoperability)

Platform services

development

Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q25.4.1 Pilots priorities & infrastructure mapping 5.4.2 Visibility solutions design 5.4.3 Platform Infrastructure Development 5.4.4 Platform services development

2013 2014 2015

PARTNER Pilots priorities & infra

mapping

Visibility solution design

Platform infra development

Platform visibility services

developmentLAZIO REGION

APCivitavecchia X X X X

FVG

ITL X X X X

APOLBIA X X X X

MINTRAGR X X

CERTH X X X X

THPA X X

TRAINOSE

PLAZA X X X X

ZLC X X X X

VPF X X X X

AFT X

UNIMBBSC X

CCEIA X

Phase 5.4 Development of intermodal chain visibility platform

Phase 5.5: Pilots Implementation & Assessment

Focus

one-stopshops

Mark

et

seg

men

t

Fre

igh

tP

assen

ger

Cru

ise

supplychain

integration& transparency

logisticsplatforms

port-urbanarea

integration

Visibilityplatform

SPHIIS

Cruisebest practice

AdriaWestMed

AgroFood

Pass

en

ger

/ Fr

eig

ht

info

mobili

ty p

latf

orm

WP5 outcomes

WP 5 ICT Pilots

Single windowplatform

WP 6 non ICT Pilots

Role of pilots implementation & assessment in fulfilling MED Strategic call requirements….

User needs EvaluationPilot testSystem design

Best practice analysis

Analysis & assessment

Analysis RequirementsMethodology

basePilot test

Phase 5.5: Project pilots Implementation

Pilot 1: Spanish port-hinterland information system

Port networking

Pilot 2: AdriaWestMed

Pilot 3: Strengthening of the global competitiveness of Med cruise tourism

Best practice transfer

SC mapping EvaluationLegal

frameworkICT reqs

SC definition

Pilot 4: Agro-food supply chain pilot

Pilot 5: Passenger & freight infomobility

ICT ICT

WP5 WP6

Phase 5.5: Pilots Implementation & Assessment

5.5.1 Demonstration Scenarios Development Early description of Demo case + implementation

scenario +demo time schedule Establishment of Demo stakeholders group Definition of KPIs to be reached & assessment

methodology Pilot Implementation in accordance to scenario

5.5.2 Pilots Industry & Administration Community awareness

Objective: to raise awareness to the pilot related communities both at Public (customs, ports, railways) and private sector (terminal operators, exporters, cargo owners, shipping lines, frforwarders etc)

of the capabilities of the solution and increase participation of industrial actors in the demonstration activity.

5.5.3 Pilots Implementation Assessment

This task foresees two types of assessment:• Technical assessment which aims to evaluate technical

aspects such as user friendliness, robustness, interoperability with ICT solutions…

• Business assessment evaluating the impact to process facilitation, operations efficiency etc

Demo Cases Communication

Plan

Community Awareness

Communication Plan

Technical Assessment Report

Business Assessment Report

Phase 5.5:What is assessed ?Technical Evaluatio

n

SW Platform (CERTH)

Intermodal SC Visibility

Platform (CERTH)

Spanish Port Hinterland

Intermodal IS (PLAZA)

Passenger and freight

Info-mobility Pilot (ITL)

Business Evaluatio

n

SW Platform (CERTH)

Intermodal SC Visibility

Platform (CERTH

Spanish Port Hinterland

Intermodal IS (PLAZA)

Passenger and freight

Info-mobility Pilot (ITL)

Cruise Best Practice Pilot

(BSC)

AdriaWest Med (..)

AGROFOOD (ITL)

PARTNER Development of demo scenarios

Pilots industry & admin

community awareness

Pilots implementation

assessment

LAZIO REGION X X

APCivitavecchia X X

FVG X X

ITL X X

APOLBIA X X

MINTRAGR X

CERTH X X

THPA X

TRAINOSE X

PLAZA X X

ZLC X X

VPF X X

AFT X

UNIMB X

BSC X X

CCEIA X

Phase 5.5: Pilots Implementation & Assessment

Thank You !!Looking forward for cooperating

with you!!!

gea@certh.grlgagatsi@certh.grhalatsis@certh.gr

Projet cofinancé par le Fonds Européen de Développement Régional

Project cofinanced by the European Regional Development Fund

Discussion issues

The…FUTUREMED Platforms

FUTUREMED Capitalisation Platform (WP3)… an active promotion tool for dynamic interaction with external parties, beyond the lifespan of the project.

Observatory (WP3)… an open and well networked stakeholders community, providing solutions for critical knowledge exchange and support to policy implementation along with a compliance facilitation platform

Single Window Platform (WP5)… single window platform for customs processes facilitation

Chain visibility Platform (WP5)… an “interoperability enabling” platform that mix the technical and the community dimension of the transport chain operation within the infrastructure of the platform

6 Stakeholder Platforms (WP6 )… involvement of public and private sectors bringing together port authorities, shipping companies, rail/road operators and logistics operators would contribute to find solutions, raise awareness and stimulate concrete actions which can “reduce the volume of road traffic”.

ICT

ORG

ICT

ORG

ICT

ICT

ORG

The…non – FUTUREMED systems/tools National Custom Single Windows (in particular…Italy,

Greece, Spain, France, Slovenia, Cyprus)

UIRnet – Italian National Platform for integrated logistics and intermodal transport . The platform offers Traffic information service designed to assist the one-way "trip" of freight, from pick up to delivery (with focus on road haulage). They include:

Management of tracking and tracing haulage

Prevention & management of critical situations (eg theft, delays, ...) that could impact journey safety and delivery schedules

The exchange of information and messages between logistics operators directed at individual or group operators identifiable via different variables (location, size of the vehicle, freight product category, ...)

Collecting and processing haulage and traffic information, which when assemble can be used to support of decisions in planning and execution of logistics

Two types of Information Systems within FutureMed

Single Window platform

Stand-alone Pilot-specific

Spanish port-hinterland IS

Passenger & freight

infomobility IS

Visibilityplatform

WP 5 outputs & the role of non-pilot partnersSingle

WindowPlatform

Pilot testing

Platform development

Requirements assessment

Chain visibilityPlatform

Pilot testing

Platform development

Requirements assessment

XMoITN

CERTH

ThPA

TrainOSE

AFT

Maribor Univ

CCEIA

X

X X

X XXX

X

XMoITN

CERTH

ThPA

TrainOSE

AFT

Maribor Univ

CCEIA

X

X X

X XXX

X

Partners involvement in WP5 phases

The FUTUREMED ObservatoryCharacteristics the Observatory will live after the project’s completion the Observatory will make use of tools developed during

the project (e.g. web portal in phase 2.2)

Tasks to “store” all project results (intermediary and final) in

an easily accessible form by all interested parties to provide a forum of all relevant stakeholders, after the

project is completed to define targets for the project pilots at the medium-

and long-term to monitor the implementation of the project’s medium-

and long-term recommendations and assess their actual impact in relation to the targets set for each project pilot

to consolidate the FutureMed results with the results of other ongoing Med projects (e.g. MedNet)

Issues to be resolved overlap/similarities with the stakeholders’ platform

(phase 6.2) overlap/similarities with the capitalisation platform

(phase 3.1)