factors influencing farmers’ preferences about agricultural equipment supply

1
FactorsMinfluencingMfarmers’MpreferencesMaboutM agriculturalMequipmentMsupply.M AMliteratureMoverview Davide RIZZOo Elisa M9RR9CCINIo 9nne COM79UD direct seeding mulching decision support system FdssC rollover protective structures impact technical efficiency erosion control adoption farmer health ghana mechanisation soil erosion animal traction decision support systems mechanization land degradation risk assessment methane agricultural engineering plant disease carbon dioxide energy agricultural machinery design agriculture agricultural tractor agricultural safety farmers farm safety crop residues innovation soil organic matter evaluation ict noise processing ard plough tractors gnss incident management china water quality accident extension economics marasha grain conservation tillage derderoM hsv Fhue saturation valueC permanent beds farm survey adaptation decision making intervention food security gis bangladesh accident prevention north carolina crop residue management climate change carbon sequestration farming gps field efficiency cover crops personal protective equipment energy efficiency raised beds injury rops passive protection emissions conservation agriculture agricultural mechanization cool farm tool tractor crop rotation agricultural injuries india economic growth indigenous knowledge noYtillage inverse relationship technology internet of things farm vehicle crashes agricultural hazards monitoring farm machinery conventional tillage equipment nitrous oxide income survey erosion soil management automation sustainability control systems cropping systems precision agriculture minimum tillage machinery SPAIN AUSTRIA FRANCE MALAYSIA BRAZIL OMAN NEW ZEALAND DENMARK NETHERLANDS TUNISIA AUSTRALIA PORTUGAL BELGIUM THAILAND ETHIOPIA SOUTH KOREA POLAND UNITED STATES USA BULGARIA UNITED STATES CHINA TURKEY BANGLADESH ITALY UNITED KINGDOM SWEDEN SPAIN MADAGASCAR FRANCE GERMANY NIGERIA TURKEY EGYPT INDIA GHANA UGANDA CZECH REPUBLIC livestock mulching agricultural planter gamma radiation labor compost commercial energy energyYuse patterns rural areas consolidation automatic data acquisition radiationYcurable impregnants arable farm mechanisation ecosystems emergence specific energy burkina faso benefitYcost ratio modifications nonYrenewable energy sources new german federal states energy requirements energy mix yield renewable energy sources draught animal power farming machinery arable farming machinery selection telephone survey outputYinput energy ratio agricultural equipment risk perceptions agriculture machines human energy perception analysis croppingZfallowing practices safety zebu working postures corn sprayers tractors sawmiller change northern cameroon hazard evaluation educational programs rural rehabilitation smallholder timber production zai fastYgrowing tree species cropping intensity soybean noYtill shifting agricultural model gmelina arborea horse artifacts unsprayed crop edges machinery system simulation households conservation farming conjoint analysis farmer field efficiency personal protective equipment childhood injuries farm road system agricultural mechanization archaeological finds wheat crop donkey tilling preventive strategies expertise stand establishment amazonia road construction spatial data technical and ecological demands surveillance transport land rotation information distribution machinery management fuelwood sourceYwise energy physiological effects performance tests discomfort decayed wood energy analysis nature conservation documentation marketing tree products health concerns operationYwise energy NETHERLANDS ITALY PHILIPPINES AUSTRALIA UNITED STATES INDIA FRANCE UNITED STATES AUSTRIA AUSTRALIA NETHERLANDS FRANCE GERMANY PUERTO RICO BRAZIL BRAZIL FRANCE INDIA UNITED STATES farm power and machinery availability questionnaire epidemiology decision making workable days wounds and injuries UNITED STATES CANADA FRANCE AUSTRALIA anthropometric agricultural machinery industry assistive technology rollover protective structures environmental modification children erosion control combine health animal traction agricultural labour markets decision support systems compaction mechanization rops cutting width agricultural machinery safety alqueva controlled traffic noise design cattle agriculture controller area network agricultural fatalities alcohol agricultural safety farmers access safety ard plough tractors china water quality environmental benefits accident disabilities conservation tillage agricultural worker cropping pattern derderoM agricultural census africa noYtill decision making management accident prevention environmental goods and services north carolina conservation carbon sequestration injury energy cover crops conventional till agroecology passive protection emissions crop production systems conservation agriculture crop rotation agricultural injuries digital filters noYtillage crash data dealer farm vehicle crashes agricultural hazards farm machinery conventional tillage equipment depression soil erosion pesticides alentejo draught chinese farmers deforestation sustainability precision agriculture machinery UNITED STATES SLOVAKIA UNITED KINGDOM GERMANY JAPAN UNITED KINGDOM POLAND AUSTRALIA AUSTRALIA IRAN UNITED STATES PORTUGAL NIGERIA UNITED KINGDOM CANADA INDIA BRAZIL TUNISIA KENYA BENIN CHINA NIGERIA AUSTRALIA UNITED STATES FRANCE BELGIUM ETHIOPIA JAPAN SPAIN AUSTRIA NETHERLANDS farm mechanization weed management direct seeding subYsaharan africa decision support system FdssC wind erosion agricultural mechanization index technical efficiency adoption tillage farmer ghana mechanisation zimbabwe mechanization support vector machine FsvmC agricultural machinery total power support vector machine agricultural informationZknowledge risk assessment watershed agricultural engineering plant disease climate change agroYexporting period agriculture agricultural tractor farmers crop residues innovation soil organic matter sensor ict processing robots tractors gnss technology adoption ontology strip tillage accident extension economics survey conservation tillage hsv Fhue saturation valueC adopters soil health adaptation agricultural operations food security gis bangladesh agricultural knowledge crop residue management agricultural systems agriculture machinery agricultural labor energy gps smallholder farmers field efficiency knowledge representation energy efficiency agricultural development machinery management economic growth agentYbased modelling conservation agriculture agricultural mechanization tractor technological innovation crop rotation india agricultural machinery precision agriculture noYtillage technology internet of things farm machinery conventional tillage grain erosion technological trajectories affordance soil management automation support vector regression agricultural services control systems cropping systems minimum tillage agricultural machinery cost KENYA BELGIUM TANZANIA MALAYSIA IRAN CROATIA CZECH REPUBLIC NORWAY INDIA CHINA INDIA UNITED STATES FRANCE TURKEY GERMANY UNITED STATES GHANA FINLAND CANADA SOUTH KOREA SPAIN JAPAN CHINA AUSTRIA UGANDA EGYPT INDIA THAILAND USA CANADA SRI LANKA AUSTRALIA ITALY UNITED STATES GREECE GREECE DENMARK UNITED KINGDOM Saturday February 25 2017 Parc des Expositions - Villepinte | France Intensive and environmentally friendly agriculture an opportunity for innovation in TITLE@97S@KEY r 2farmer.2 c 9ND TITLE@97S@KEY r 2surve.2 c OR TITLE@ 97S@KEY r 2need.2 c OR TITLE@97S@KEY r2decision.2 c OR TITLE@97S@KEY r2prefer.2 c OR TITLE@97S@KEY r 2criter.2 c OR TITLE@97S@KEY r 2adoption2c 9ND TITLE@97S@KEY r 2agri*Mequipment.2 c OR TITLE@97S@KEY r 2farm*Mequipment.2 c OR TITLE@97S@KEY r 2agri*Mtool.2 c OR TITLE@97S@KEY r 2farm*Mtool.2 c OR TITLE@ 97S@KEY r 2agri*Mmachine.2 c OR TITLE@ 97S@KEY r 2farm*Mmachine.2 c OR TITLE@ 97S@KEY r 2agri*Mmechani?ation2 c OR TITLE@97S@KEY r 2farm*Mmechani?ation.2c 1970-2000 ChaireMAgro-MachinismeMetM NouvellesMTechnologies 1970-today N = 576 N = 143 N = 163 N = 270 2001-2010 2011-today UP kyhk@hy@hyg INTER9CT UniLaSalleo 7eauvais rFrancec contactMauthor: davidefrizzo;unilasalleffr TheMaimMofMthisMstudy is to identify the key factors influencing farmers’ decision making and preferences about the equipment supplyf The study is based on an overview of the available scientific literature and reportso and it is being completed by an ongoingMM surveyMofMtheMfarmers’MneedsM concerning the agri@ equipmentf OurMgoalMis to define a generic analytical framework to explore the expectations and willingness of farmers in the adoption of equipment innovationf We foster studies at levels ranging from regions to countriesf WeMpresentMhere the early results of the first stepx a literature review performed on the SCOPUS databasef We searched for all the documents mentiong rin titleo abstract or keywordsc the farmers and the agricultural or farm|ing equipmento with a focus on surveyo needso decision r@makingo supporto etcfco criteria and adoptionf E9RLY RESULTSP rongoing researchc AMbibliometricManalysisM was performed using the CorText software rIFRISo kyhmc to perform lexical analysis and mapping the structure and the dynamics of the corpusf The software first calculates the frequency of occurrence of each termW then normalizes these occurrences and co@occurrences as proximity measurements to link the nodes rTancoigne et alfo kyhmcf Combined mapping and clustering of the most frequent keywords that appeared in the research field in the period hwby@kyhb using CorText softwaref The dimension of the circles is proportional to the number of retrievalsf Nodes are linked according to different types of proximity rmeasurex chi@squared testcf Clusters of the main keywords and related Countries r abovec and difference per sub@period r belowc References IFRIS3 20148 CorText8 Université Paris5Est 77420 Champs Sur Marne8 Available from: http://manager8cortext8net/ Tancoigne et al8 20148 The place of agricultural sciences in the literature on ecosystem services8 Ecosyst8 Serv8 10:35548

Upload: davide-rizzo

Post on 03-Mar-2017

38 views

Category:

Science


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Factors influencing farmers’ preferences about agricultural equipment supply

FactorsMinfluencingMfarmers’MpreferencesMaboutMagriculturalMequipmentMsupply.MAMliteratureMoverview

Davide)RIZZOo)Elisa)M9RR9CCINIo)9nne)COM79UD

direct Sseeding

m ulching

decisionSsupport Ssystem SFdssC

rolloverSprotect iveSst ructures

im pact

technicalSefficiency

erosionScont rol

adopt ion

farm er

health

ghana

m echanisat ion

soilSerosion

anim alSt ract ion

decisionSsupport Ssystem s

m echanizat ion

landSdegradat ion

riskSassessm ent

m ethane

agriculturalSengineering

plant Sdisease

carbonSdioxide

energy

agriculturalSm achinery

design

agriculture

agriculturalSt ractor

agriculturalSsafety

farm ers

farm

safety

cropSresidues

innovat ion

soilSorganicSm at ter

evaluat ion

ict

noise

processing

ardSplough

t ractors

gnss

incident

m anagem ent

china

waterSquality

accident

extension

econom ics

m arasha

grain

conservat ionSt illage

derderoM

hsvSFhueSsaturat ionSvalueC

perm anent Sbeds

farm Ssurvey

adaptat ion

decisionSm aking

intervent ion

foodSsecurity

gis

bangladesh

accident Sprevent ion

northScarolina

cropSresidueSm anagem ent

clim ateSchange

carbonSsequest rat ion

farm ing

gps

fieldSefficiency

coverScrops

personalSprotect iveSequipm ent

energySefficiency

raisedSbeds

injury

rops

passiveSprotect ion

em issions

conservat ionSagriculture

agriculturalSm echanizat ion

coolSfarm Stool

t ractor

cropSrotat ion

agriculturalSinjuries

india

econom icSgrowth

indigenousSknowledge

noYt illage

inverseSrelat ionship

technology

internet SofSthings

farm SvehicleScrashes

agriculturalShazards

m onitoring

farm Sm achinery

convent ionalSt illage

equipm ent

nit rousSoxide

incom e

surveyerosion

soilSm anagem ent

autom at ion

sustainability

cont rolSsystem s

croppingSsystem s

precisionSagriculturem inim um St illage

m achinery

SPAINAUSTRIAFRANCE

M ALAYSIABRAZILOM AN

NEW SZEALANDDENM ARK

NETHERLANDS

TUNISIAAUSTRALIAPORTUGAL

BELGIUMTHAILANDETHIOPIA

SOUTHSKOREAPOLAND

UNITEDSSTATES

USABULGARIA

UNITEDSSTATES

CHINATURKEY

BANGLADESH

ITALYUNITEDSKINGDOM

SW EDEN

SPAINM ADAGASCAR

FRANCE

GERM ANYNIGERIATURKEY

EGYPTINDIA

GHANAUGANDA

CZECHSREPUBLIC

livestock

m ulching

agricultural

planter

gam m aSradiat ion

labor

com post

com m ercialSenergy

energyYuseSpat terns

ruralSareas

consolidat ion

autom at icSdataSacquisit ion

radiat ionYcurableSim pregnants

arableSfarm Sm echanisat ion

ecosystem s

em ergence

specificSenergy

burkinaSfaso

benefit Ycost Srat io

m odificat ions

nonYrenewableSenergySsources

newSgerm anSfederalSstates

energySrequirem ents

energySm ix

yield

renewableSenergySsources

draught Sanim alSpower

farm ingSm achinery

arableSfarm ing

m achinerySselect ion

telephoneSsurvey

output Yinput SenergySrat io

agriculturalSequipm ent

riskSpercept ionsagriculture

m achines

hum anSenergy

percept ionSanalysis

croppingZfallowingSpract ices

safety

zebu

workingSpostures

corn

sprayers

t ractors

sawm iller

change

northernScam eroon

hazardSevaluat ion

educat ionalSprogram s

ruralSrehabilitat ion

sm allholderSt im berSproduct ion

zai

fast YgrowingSt reeSspecies

croppingSintensity

soybean

noYt ill

shift ingSagriculturalSm odel

gm elinaSarborea

horse

art ifacts

unsprayedScropSedges

m achinerySsystem Ssim ulat ion

households

conservat ion

farm ing

conjoint Sanalysis

farm er

fieldSefficiency

personalSprotect iveSequipm ent

childhoodSinjuries

farm SroadSsystem

agriculturalSm echanizat ion

archaeologicalSfinds

wheat Scrop

donkey

t illing

prevent iveSst rategies

expert ise

standSestablishm ent

am azonia

roadSconst ruct ion

spat ialSdata

technicalSandSecologicalSdem ands

surveillance

t ransport

landSrotat ion

inform at ionSdist ribut ion

m achinerySm anagem ent

fuelwood

sourceYwiseSenergy

physiologicalSeffects

perform anceStests

discom fort

decayedSwood

energySanalysis

natureSconservat ion

docum entat ion

m arket ingSt reeSproducts

healthSconcerns

operat ionYwiseSenergy

NETHERLANDS

ITALY

PHILIPPINESAUSTRALIA

UNITEDSSTATES

INDIA

FRANCE

UNITEDSSTATES

AUSTRIA

AUSTRALIA

NETHERLANDS

FRANCE

GERM ANY

PUERTOSRICOBRAZIL

BRAZILFRANCE

INDIA

UNITEDSSTATES

farm power and machinery availability

quest ionnaire

epidem iology

decisionSm aking

workableSdays

woundsSandSinjuries

UNITEDSSTATES

CANADAFRANCE

AUSTRALIA

anthropom etric

agriculturalSm achinerySindust ry

assist iveStechnology

rolloverSprotect iveSst ructures

environm entalSm odificat ion

children

erosionScont rol

com binehealth

anim alSt ract ion

agriculturalSlabourSm arkets

decisionSsupport Ssystem s

com pact ion

m echanizat ion

rops

cut t ingSwidth

agriculturalSm achinerySsafety

alqueva

cont rolledSt raffic

noise

design

cat t le

agriculture

cont rollerSareaSnetwork

agriculturalSfatalit ies

alcohol

agriculturalSsafety

farm ers

access

safety

ardSplough

t ractors

china

waterSquality

environm entalSbenefits

accidentdisabilit ies

conservat ionSt illage

agriculturalSworker

croppingSpat tern

derderoM agriculturalScensus

africa

noYt ill

decisionSm aking

m anagem ent

accident Sprevent ion

environm entalSgoodsSandSservices

northScarolina

conservat ion

carbonSsequest rat ion

injury

energy

coverScrops

convent ionalSt ill

agroecology

passiveSprotect ion

em issions

cropSproduct ionSsystem s

conservat ionSagriculture

cropSrotat ion

agriculturalSinjuries

digitalSfilters

noYt illage

crashSdata

dealer

farm SvehicleScrashes

agriculturalShazards

farm Sm achinery

convent ionalSt illage

equipm ent

depression

soilSerosion

pest icides

alentejo

draught

chineseSfarm ers

deforestat ion

sustainability

precisionSagriculture

m achinery

UNITEDSSTATESSLOVAKIA

UNITEDSKINGDOM

GERM ANYJAPAN

UNITEDSKINGDOM

POLANDAUSTRALIA

AUSTRALIAIRAN

UNITEDSSTATES

PORTUGALNIGERIA

UNITEDSKINGDOM

CANADAINDIA

BRAZIL

TUNISIAKENYABENIN

CHINA

NIGERIAAUSTRALIA

UNITEDSSTATES

FRANCEBELGIUMETHIOPIA

JAPAN

SPAINAUSTRIA

NETHERLANDS

farm Sm echanizat ion

weedSm anagem ent

direct Sseeding

subYsaharanSafrica

decisionSsupport Ssystem SFdssC

windSerosion

agriculturalSm echanizat ionSindex

technicalSefficiency

adopt ion

t illage

farm er

ghana

m echanisat ion

zim babwe

m echanizat ion

support SvectorSm achineSFsvm C

agriculturalSm achineryStotalSpower

support SvectorSm achine

agriculturalSinform at ionZknowledge

riskSassessm ent

watershed

agriculturalSengineering

plant Sdisease

clim ateSchange

agroYexport ingSperiod

agriculture

agriculturalSt ractor

farm ers

cropSresidues

innovat ion

soilSorganicSm at ter

sensor

ictprocessing

robots

t ractors

gnss

technologySadopt ion

ontology

st ripSt illage

accident

extension

econom ics

survey

conservat ionSt illage

hsvSFhueSsaturat ionSvalueC

adopters

soilShealth

adaptat ion

agriculturalSoperat ions

foodSsecurity

gis

bangladesh

agriculturalSknowledge

cropSresidueSm anagem ent

agriculturalSsystem s

agricultureSm achinery

agriculturalSlabor

energy

gps

sm allholderSfarm ers

fieldSefficiency

knowledgeSrepresentat ion

energySefficiency

agriculturalSdevelopm ent

m achinerySm anagem ent

econom icSgrowth

agent YbasedSm odelling

conservat ionSagriculture

agriculturalSm echanizat ion

t ractor

technologicalSinnovat ion

cropSrotat ion

india

agriculturalSm achinery

precisionSagriculture

noYt illage

technology

internet SofSthings

farm Sm achinery

convent ionalSt illage

grain

erosion

technologicalSt rajectories

affordance

soilSm anagem ent

autom at ion

support SvectorSregression

agriculturalSservices

cont rolSsystem s

croppingSsystem s

m inim um St illage

agriculturalSm achineryScost

KENYABELGIUM

TANZANIA

M ALAYSIAIRAN

CROATIA

CZECHSREPUBLICNORW AY

INDIA

CHINAINDIA

UNITEDSSTATES

FRANCE

TURKEYGERM ANY

UNITEDSSTATES

GHANAFINLANDCANADA

SOUTHSKOREASPAINJAPAN

CHINAAUSTRIAUGANDA

EGYPTINDIA

THAILANDUSA

CANADA

SRISLANKAAUSTRALIA

ITALYUNITEDSSTATES

GREECE

GREECEDENM ARK

UNITEDSKINGDOM

SaturdaymFebruarym25m2017mParcmdesmExpositionsm-mVillepintem|mFrance

Intensivemandmenvironmentallymfriendlymagriculturemanmopportunitymforminnovationminm

TITLE@97S@KEY)r)2farmer.2)c)

9ND))TITLE@97S@KEY)r)2surve.2)c))OR))TITLE@97S@KEY)r)2need.2)c))OR))TITLE@97S@KEY)r)2decision.2)c))OR))TITLE@97S@KEY)r)2prefer.2)c))OR))TITLE@97S@KEY)r)2criter.2)c))OR))TITLE@97S@KEY)r)2adoption2)c)

9ND))TITLE@97S@KEY)r)2agri*Mequipment.2)c))OR))TITLE@97S@KEY)r)2farm*Mequipment.2)c))OR))TITLE@97S@KEY)r)2agri*Mtool.2)c))OR))TITLE@97S@KEY)r)2farm*Mtool.2)c))OR))TITLE@97S@KEY)r)2agri*Mmachine.2)c))OR))TITLE@97S@KEY)r)2farm*Mmachine.2)c))OR))TITLE@97S@KEY)r)2agri*Mmechani?ation2)c))OR))TITLE@97S@KEY)r)2farm*Mmechani?ation.2c))

1970-2000

ChaireMAgro-MachinismeMetMNouvellesMTechnologies

1970-today

N = 576

N = 143 N = 163 N = 2702001-2010 2011-today

UP)kyhk@hy@hyg)INTER9CTUniLaSalleo)7eauvais)rFrancec))

contactMauthor:)davidefrizzo;unilasalleffr

TheMaimMofMthisMstudy)is)to)identify)the)key)factors)influencing)farmers’)decision)making)and)preferences)about)the)equipment)supplyf)The)study)is)based)on)an)overview)of)the)available)scientific)literature)and)reportso)and)it)is)being)completed)by)an)ongoingMMsurveyMofMtheMfarmers’MneedsMconcerning)the)agri@equipmentf)))))

OurMgoalMis)to)define)a)generic)analytical)framework)to)explore)the)expectations)and)willingness)of)farmers)in)the)adoption)of)equipment)innovationf)We)foster)studies)at)levels)ranging)from)regions)to)countriesf)

WeMpresentMhere)the)early)results)of)the)first)stepx)a)literature)review)performed)on)the)SCOPUS)databasef)We)searched)for)all)the)documents)mentiong)rin)titleo)abstract)or)keywordsc)the)farmers)and)the)agricultural)or)farm|ing)equipmento)with)a)focus)on)surveyo)needso)decision)r@makingo)supporto)etcfco)criteria)and)adoptionf

E9RLY)RESULTSP

rongoing)

researchc

AMbibliometricManalysisMwas)performed)using)the)CorText)software)rIFRISo)kyhmc)to)perform)lexical)analysis)and)mapping)the)structure)and)the)dynamics)of)the)corpusf)The)software)first)calculates)the)frequency)of)occurrence)of)each)termW)then)normalizes)these)occurrences)and)co@occurrences)as)proximity)measurements)to)link)the)nodes)rTancoigne)et)alfo)kyhmcf)

Combined)mapping)and)clustering)of)the)most)frequent)keywords)that)appeared)in)the)research)field)in)the)period)hwby@kyhb)using)CorText)softwaref)The)dimension)of)the)circles)is)proportional)to)the)number)of)retrievalsf)Nodes)are)linked)according)to)different)types)of)proximity)rmeasurex)chi@squared)testcf

Clusters)of)the)main)keywords)and)related)Countries)rabovec)and)difference)per)sub@period)rbelowc

ReferencesIFRIS3p20148pCorText8pUniversitépParis5Estp77420pChampspSurpMarne8pAvailablepfrom:phttp://manager8cortext8net/Tancoignepetpal8p20148pThepplacepofpagriculturalpsciencespinpthepliteratureponpecosystempservices8pEcosyst8pServ8p10:35548