factors modifying the framework established: tides atmospheric forcing - wind, barometric pressure...
TRANSCRIPT
Factors modifying the framework established:
Tides
Atmospheric Forcing - wind, barometric pressure
River Discharge
Bathymetry
Morphology
TIDES
Tide - generic term to define alternating rise and fall in sea level with respect to land and is produced by the balance between the gravitational force (of the moon and sun mainly) and the centrifugal acceleration.
Tide also occurs in large lakes, in the atmosphere, and within the solid crust
Gravitational Force (Newton’s Law of Gravitation):
F = GmM/R2
G = 6.67×10-11 N m2/kg2
Centrifugal Force
Center of mass of Earth-Moon system ~1,700 km from Earth’s surface(because Earth is 81 times heavier than Moon) – Centrifugal = Gravitational
EQUILIBRIUM TIDE
Moon’s Gravitational Force (changes from one side of the earth to the other)F = GmM/R2
Tide Generating Force (Difference between centrifugal and gravitational)
How strong is the Tide-Generating Force?
PAB S
SP 60Since
Tide-generating Force at A: 3
2
P
SMmGFF cA
2SP
MmGFA
Gravitational Force at A:
2P
MmGFc
Centrifugal Force at A:
22 P
MmG
SP
MmGFF cA
Imbalance (Tide-generating force at A):
Tide-generating Force at B: 3
2
P
SMmGFF cB
2234
2
2
2
SPSPP
SPSMGmFF cA
22
2
SPP
SPSMGmFF cA
The mass of the sun is 2x1027 metric tons while that of the moon is only 7.3x1019 metric tons.
The sun is 390 times farther away from the earth than is the moon.
The relative Tide Generating Force on Earth = [(2x1027/7.3x1019)]/(3903)
or = 2.7x107/5.9x107 = 0.46 or 46%
How strong is the Tide-Generating Force?
PAB S
Tide-generating Force at A: 3
2
P
SMmGFF cA
Tide-generating Force at B: 3
2
P
SMmGFF cB
Equatorial Tides
Image from Hubble Telescope
Tropic Tides
Image from Hubble Telescope
What alters the range and phase of tides produced by Equilibrium Theory?
Non-astronomical factors:
coastline configurationbathymetryatmospheric forcing (wind velocity and barometric pressure)hydrography
may alter speed, produce resonance effects and seiching, storm surges
In the open ocean, tidally induced variations of sea level are a few cm.
When the tidal wave moves to the continental shelf and into confining channels, the variations may become greater.
Keep in mind that tidal waves travel as shallow (long) waves
How so?
Typical wavelengths = 4500 km (semidiurnal wave traveling over 1000 m of water)
Ratio of depth / wavelength = 1 / 4500
Then, their phase speed is: C = [ gH ]0.5
The tide observed at any location is the superposition of several constituents that arise from diverse tidal forcing mechanisms.
Main constituents: Principal Lunar Semidiurnal M2 12.42 h
Principal Solar Semidiurnal S2 12.00 h
Larger Lunar Elliptic Semidiurnal N2 12.66 h
Lunisolar diurnal K1 23.93 h
Lunar Diurnal O1 25.82 h
...)sin()sin()sin( 222222222 NNNSSSMMM tAtAtA
The Form factor F = [ K1 + O1 ] / [ M2 + S2 ] is customarily used to characterize the tide.
When 0.25 < F < 1.25 the tide is mixed - mainly semidiurnal
F > 3 the tide is diurnal F < 0.25 the tide is semidiurnal
When 1.25 < F < 3.00 the tide is mixed - mainly diurnal
F > 3 the tide is diurnal F < 0.25 the tide is semidiurnal
When 1.25 < F < 3.00 the tide is mixed - mainly diurnalWhen 0.25 < F < 1.25 the tide is mixed - mainly semidiurnal
Superposition of constituents generates modulation - e.g. fortnightly, monthly
This applies for both sea level and velocity
Subtidal modulation by two tidal constituents
In Ponce de León Inlet: M2 = 0.41 m; N2 = 0.09 m; O1: 0.06 m; S2: 0.06 m; K1= 0.08 m
F = [K1 + 01] / [S2 + M2 ] = 0.30
GNVGNV
Panama Panama CityCity
In Panama City, FL: M2 = 0.085 m; N2 = 0.017 m; O1: 0.442 m; S2: 0.035 m; K1= 0.461 m
F = [K1 + 01] / [S2 + M2 ] = 7.52
Co-oscillation
Independent tide - caused by gravitational and centrifugal forces directly on the waters of the estuary -- usually small for typical dimensions of estuaries
Co-oscillating tide - caused by the ocean tide at the entrance to the estuary as driving force
The wave propagates into the basin and may be subject to RESONANCE and RECTIFICATION -- alters tidal flows and produces subtidal motions
Let’s study what happens to the wave as it propagates into the estuary...
Progressive wave
Assume linear, frictionless motion in the x direction only, under homogeneous conditions.
The momentum balance is then:x
gtu
And the continuity equation is:tHx
u
1
The solution is d’Alembert’s solution, which can be studied with the sinusoidal wave form:
txatT
xL
a
sin
22sin
xu
txaHtH
cos
11
txaHC
txaH
u sinsin
1
-1 .5
-1
-0 .5
0
0 .5
1
1 .5
-0 .7 1 6 8 0 .2 8 3 2 1 .2 8 3 2 2 .2 8 3 2 3 .2 8 3 2 4 .2 8 3 2 5 .2 8 3 2 6 .2 8 3 2
a
time
2
22
2
2
2
2
xC
xgH
t
linear, partial differential equation (hyperbolic)
txa sin
txa sin
txaHC
u sin
CH
u
This indicates that the flow is in phasewith the elevation
-1 .5
-1
-0 .5
0
0 .5
1
1 .5
-0 .7 1 6 8 0 .2 8 3 2 1 .2 8 3 2 2 .2 8 3 2 3 .2 8 3 2 4 .2 8 3 2 5 .2 8 3 2 6 .2 8 3 2
a
time
-1 .5
-1
-0 .5
0
0 .5
1
1 .5
-0 .7 1 6 8 0 .2 8 3 2 1 .2 8 3 2 2 .2 8 3 2 3 .2 8 3 2 4 .2 8 3 2 5 .2 8 3 2 6 .2 8 3 2
u
a C/H
time
Standing wave
The momentum balance is also:x
gtu
And the continuity equation is:tHx
u
1
The solution is: txatxatxa sincossinsin
xu
txaHtH
coscos
11
xtaH
Cxta
Hu
sincossincos1
txa sincos
txaHC
u cossin
This indicates that the flow is out of phase with the elevation by 90 degrees
-1 .5
-1
-0 .5
0
0 .5
1
1 .5
-0 .7 1 6 8 0 .2 8 3 2 1 .2 8 3 2 2 .2 8 3 2 3 .2 8 3 2 4 .2 8 3 2 5 .2 8 3 2 6 .2 8 3 2
a
time
-1 .5
-1
-0 .5
0
0 .5
1
1 .5
-0 .7 1 6 8 0 .2 8 3 2 1 .2 8 3 2 2 .2 8 3 2 3 .2 8 3 2 4 .2 8 3 2 5 .2 8 3 2 6 .2 8 3 2
u
a C/Htime
Resonance
At the mouth x = L, ta sin0
txa sincosSubstituting into ta sin0 at x = L
L
tatLa sinsincos 0
tLxa
sin
coscos0
La
acos
0
For resonance to exist, the denominator should tend to zero, i.e.,
122
22
22
2
nL
nLL
and CTnL ;12
4
The natural period of oscillation is then:
1214
nCL
TN
1214
nCL
TN
tLxa
sin
coscos0
tLx
HCa
u
coscossin0
L
u
4
Example of seiching
For an estuary with length < λ /4, u is zero at the head and maximum at the mouth
For longer estuaries u is zero at x = 0, λ / 2, 3 λ / 2,… or where sin κx = 0
and maximum at x = λ /4, 3 λ / 4, 5 λ / 4, …, i.e., where sin κx is max
1214
nCL
TNMerion’s FormulaMode 1(n =1)
H (m) L (km) C (m/s) TN (h)
Long Island Sound 20 180 14 14
Chesapeake Bay 10 250 10 28
Bay of Fundy 70 250 26 10.7
Tidal Waves With Friction
zu
Azx
gtu
z
Integrating vertically:
01
H
udzH
U
H
uuC
xg
zU
AHx
gtU bbb
z
1
tUub cos If 0
The bottom stress becomes: ttUCb coscos20
UHUC
xg
tU
r
b
0
38
Momentum balance for a progressive wave:
With continuity:xU
Ht
These are the governing equations for progressive tidal motion with friction.
Expanding this in a Fourier cosine series, to lowest order:
tUCttUC bb
cos38
coscos 20
20
maximum U precedes maximum eta
If we letHUC
r b 0
38
and gHr
Cr
22
where
2
tanr
a
We obtain the solution:
xteH
aU x cos
22
xtae x cos
UHUC
xg
tU
r
b
0
38
xU
Ht
For resonance, we have again U =0 at the head of the estuary, i.e.,
xtexteH
aU xx coscos
22
xtaextae xx coscos
Effects of Friction on a Standing Tidal Wave in an Estuary
Effects of Rotation on a Progressive Tidal Wave in a Semi-enclosed basin
xg
tu
tHxu
1
ygfu
Solution:
0 v;txcoseH
Cau Ry
txae Ry cos
R = C / f
KELVIN WAVE
Effects of Rotation on a Standing Tidal Wave in an Estuary
Two Kelvin waves of equal amplitude progressing in opposite directions.
0
v
txcosetxcoseH
Cau RyRy
txaetxae RyRy coscos
Instead of having lines of no motion, we are now reduced to a central region -- amphidromic region-- of no motion at the origin. The interference of two geostrophically controlled simple harmonic waves produces a change from a linear standing wave to a rotary wave.
0
coscos
v
txetxeHC
aU RyRy
txaetxae RyRy coscos
0
coscos
v
txetxeHC
aU RyRy
txaetxae RyRy coscos
Pinet (2006)
Pinet (2006)
Pinet (2006)
Effects of Bottom Friction on an amphydromicsystem
Parker (1990)
Virtual Amphidromes
Parker (1990)
Virtual amphidromesin Chesapeake Bay
Fisher (1986)
Tidal Rectification
Oscillatory tidal currents can produce a mean current or residual
Noticeable in areas of sharp coastline bends and bathymetric gradients
Non-linear phenomenon
Energy is transferred from the dominant tidal frequencies (e.g. M2) to both higher harmonics (e.g. M4 and M6) and to mean flows (zero frequency).
Three mechanisms responsible for this energy transfer to mean flow. Studied from vorticity tendencies.
Conservation of Potential Vorticity
Lateral Variations of Bottom Stress
Lateral Shear in the Depth-Distributed Friction Force
Robinson (1981)
Tidal flow oscillations at a single frequency (e.g. M2) will generate tidal vorticity by the above 3 mechanisms.
Because of non-linearities (products of u times u), the vorticity generated will not only be at the fundamental tidal frequency, but also at higher harmonics and at zero frequency.
tUtUtUtU 2cos121
coscoscos 20
22000
The three mechanisms can be identified from the vorticity equation.
This is derived from the depth-averaged 2-D momentum equation appropriate to barotropic tidal motion in shallow seas
UAUUHCp
UkUUtU
hb 2ˆ2)(
Taking the curl of that equation and
yu
xv
2ˆ)(
hbb A
H
UUCU
HC
Ukft
processes edissipativ
2
bottom sloping
2
shear lateralConservPot Vort
h
bbb AHUC
HUH
UCUU
HC
dtdH
Hf
dtdwhich may
be rewritten as:
Max ebb
End ebb
Max flood
End flood
Example:
Geyer and Signell (1990, JGR, 95, 3189)
Geyer and Signell (1990, JGR, 95, 3189)