faculty of cognitive sciences and human development anxiety in... · faculty of cognitive sciences...
TRANSCRIPT
i
Faculty of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development
Language Anxiety in learning English among
undergraduates in UNIMAS
Lee Yung Fook
Bachelor of Education with Honours
(Teaching of English as a Second Language)
2009
ii
Language Anxiety in learning English among undergraduates in
UNIMAS
by
Lee Yung Fook
(14346)
Bachelor of Education with Honours (TESL)
Centre for Language Studies
Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
APRIL 2009
iii
A project entitled Language Anxiety in learning English among undergraduates in
UNIMAS was written by Lee Yung Fook and submitted to the Centre for Language
studies in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Education with
Honours.
(English as a Second Language)
It is hereby confirmed that the student has
done all the necessary amendments
of the project for acceptance.
_______________________
(Signature of Supervisor)
_______________________
(Name of Supervisor)
Date: __________________
iv
ABSTRACT
LANGUAGE ANXIETY IN LEARNING ENGLISH AMONG
UNDERGRADUATES IN UNIMAS
Lee Yung Fook
This study aimed at finding out the language anxiety level and major factor causing
language anxiety in UNIMAS. This study aimed to find out the language anxiety
level, whether there are differences in anxiety level among undergraduates in
UNIMAS in terms of gender, proficiency level and stream. This study also was set
out to investigate the major factor that caused anxiety among sample. Self-rating
questionnaire was used to probe levels of language anxiety and major language
anxiety factor of 226 respondents, who were undergraduates from seven faculties in
UNIMAS. The results showed that majority of the students encountered average level
of language anxiety. 73.7% of the students experienced moderate level of language
anxiety. The result revealed that variable gender did not influence the anxiety levels
of 88 males and 138 females. Variable stream also did not influence the anxiety levels
of 129 art students and 97 sciences students. However, the result showed that variable
of proficiency levels influenced the anxiety levels of 113 high proficiency students
and 113 low proficiency students. Low proficiency students have higher anxiety level
from those high English proficiency students. The result revealed that three factors
have contributed to their anxiety, namely fear of failing, lack of preparation, and lack
of confidence. Fear of failing the class is the major factor of language anxiety.
v
ABSTRAK
KERESAHAN DALAM PEMBELAJARAN BAHASA INGGERIS DI
KALANGAN MAHASISWA DAN MAHASISWI DI UNIMAS
Lee Yung Fook
Kajian ini telah menyelidik tahap keresahan bahasa dan faktor utama yang
menyebabkan keresahan bahasa di kalangan pelajar di UNIMAS. Kajian ini bertujuan
untuk menyelidik tahap keresahan bahasa, perbezaan dalam tahap keresahan antara
pelajar UNIMAS dengan pembolehubah jantina, tahap kemahiran bahasa, dan aliran
sains atau sastera. Kajian ini juga diwujudkan untuk menyelidik faktor utama yang
mengakibatkan keresahan antara sampel. Soal kaji bentuk laporan sendiri berkaitan
dengan keresahan bahasa dan faktor keresahan bahasa utama diedarkan kepada 226
responden yang terdiri daripada pelajar dari tujuh fakulti di UNIMAS. Keputusan
menunjukkan purata pelajar mengalami tahap keresahan sederhana. Keputusan
menunjukkan pembolehubah jantina tidak mempegaruhi tahap keresahan pelajar yan
terdiri daripada 88 lelaki dan 138 perempuan. Pembolehubah aliran juga tidak
mempengaruhi tahap keresahan pelajar yang terdiri daripada 129 pelajar aliran sastera
dan 97 pelajar aliran sains. Namun demikian, keputusan menunjukkan pembolehubah
kemahiran bahasa pelajar telah mempengaruhi tahap keresahan pelajar yang terdiri
daripada 113 orang pelajar yang mempunyai tahap kemahiran bahasa tinggi dan 113
orang yang mempunyai tahap kemahiran bahasa rendah. Pelajar yang mempunyai
tahap kemahiran bahasa yang rendah mempunyai tahap keresahan bahasa yang lebih
tinggi dibandingkan dengan pelajar yang mempunyai tahap kemahiran bahasa yang
tinggi. Akhirnya, keputusan kajian ini menunjukkan tiga faktor telah menyumbang
kepada keresahan bahasa di kalagan pelajar, iaitu bimbang sebab kegagalan,
kekurangan persediaan, dan kekurangan keyakinan. Bimbang sebab kegagalan ialah
faktor utama yang menyebabkan keresahan bahasa.
vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
My sincere gratitude and thanks goes to;
My supervisor, Madam Rosnah Mustafa, for her guidance, support and
assistance throughout the semesters of completing this project;
My dearest very best friend, Shu Seng for lending his ear listening to
problems, for sharing ideas and solving problems throughout the years in
Unimas.
My beloved friends, John Lee and Kueh bip le for being my best accompanies;
for their support and encouragement and care.
My dearest coursemates for their words of encouragement, advice and helps.
And last but not least;
My parents, Mr. and Mrs. Lee Seng Hui, for their understanding and patience.
My grandma, Chong Kiun Jin and all Chong Nam Jee family members for
their helps, advice, encouragement and care.
For this, I thank you all .
vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Abstract iv
Abstrak v
Acknowledgment vi
Table of Contents vii
List of Tables vii
List of figure viii
Page
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction ……………………………………………. 1
1.2 Statement of Problems …………………………… 2
1.3 Aims and objectives of the study …………………… 3
1.4 Significance of the Study …………………………… 3
1.5 Operational definition of terms …………………… 4
1.5.1 Language anxiety ……………………………… 4
1.5.2 Foreign language anxiety …………………… … 5
1.5.3 Programme ………………………………….…. 6
1.5.4 English generic courses …………….…..……… 7
viii
1.5.5 MUET …………………………………..……… 8
1.5.6 Anxiety level ………………………….………. 10
1.5.7 Gender ………………………………….……… 11
1.5.8 Anxiety factors ……………………………….. 11
1.5.9 First or Native language (L1) …………………. 11
1.5.10 Second language (L2) ………………………… 11
1.5.11 Language Acquisition and language learning ..... 11
1.6 Scope of the Study ………………………………........ 12
1.7 Chapter Review …………………..………………. 13
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Anxiety ………………………………………..…. 14
2.2 Facilitating and Debilitating Anxiety ………..………. 14
2.3 Perspectives to the study of anxiety ………………..…. 15
2.3.1 State anxiety ……………………………...……. 15
2.3.2 Trait anxiety ……………………………..……. 16
2.3.3 Situational specific anxiety …………..……….. 17
ix
2.4 Foreign language anxiety ……………………………… 17
2.4.1 Communication apprehension …………..……… 18
2.4.2 Test anxiety ……………………………..…….. 20
2.4.3 Fear of negative anxiety ……………………… 22
2.5 Manifestation of language anxiety …………………….. 24
2.6 Language acquisition and anxiety ……………………… 27
2.7 Language anxiety and language learning …………….…. 28
2.8 Possible factors contributing to learner’s anxiety …….…. 29
2.9 Review of studies on language anxiety …………………. 31
2.10 Conclusion ………………………………………………. 33
3 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY
3.0 Introduction ….…………………………….….………. 35
3.1 Research design ….…………………….….………. 35
3.2 Participants …………………………………….......…. 36
3.3 Instruments for data collection ……………..….…. 36
3.3.1 Content of instrument …………….….….. 38
3.3.2 Pilot study …………………………………… 41
x
3.4 Data collection procedure …………………….….….. 42
3.5 Data analysis procedure …………………..……….. 42
3.5.1 Descriptive Statistics ……………………………. 43
3.6 Limitation of study ……………………………………. 47
4 FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
4.0 Preview ….…………………………….….………. 49
4.1 What is the overall anxiety level that students suffer? ….. 51
4.2 Is there any difference in anxiety level between male and
female students? …………………………..………… 53
4.3 Is there any difference in anxiety level between low and
high proficiency students? …………………………… 56
4.4 Is there any difference in anxiety level between arts and
sciences students? ……………..……………………… 58
4.5 What is the major factor that caused language anxiety
among the students? ………….………………………..... 60
4.6 Discussion on the language anxiety level and major factor
that caused anxiety among UNIMAS undergraduates ……. 63
4.7 Summary …………………………………………. 68
xi
5 SUMMARY, RECOMMENDATION AND CONCLUSION
5.0 Chapter Overview ……………………..…………… 71
5.1 Summary ………………………………………….. 71
5.2 Implications of the findings ………………….………. 76
5.3 Recommendations for future research ………….. 77
5.4 Conclusions ………………………………………….. 78
REFERENCES …………………………………………. 82
APPENDICES …………………………....…………...... 86
xii
LIST OF TABLES
Page
Table 1
Distribution of anxiety level among the sample 51
Table 2
Distribution of anxiety level among the sample in relation to gender 53
Table 3
Distribution of anxiety level among the sample in relation to proficiency
level 56
Table 4
Distribution of anxiety level among the sample in relation to stream 58
Table 5
Distribution of the five categories of factors causing language anxiety
among the sample 60
Table 6
Comparison of distribution of the five categories of factors causing
language anxiety among the sample between current study and
Ardi Marwan (2007) 66
xiii
LIST OF FIGURES
Bar Chart 1
Distribution of the five categories of factors causing language
anxiety among the sample 61
BORANG PENGESAHAN STATUS TESIS
JUDUL : LANGUAGE ANXIETY IN LEARNING ENGLISH AMONG
UNDERGRADUATES IN UNIMAS
SESI PENGAJIAN :2008/2009
Saya_______________________LEE YUNG FOOK______________________
(HURUF BESAR)
mengaku membenarkan tesis * ini disimpan di Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik,
Universiti Malaysia Sarawak dengan syarat-syarat kegunaan seperti berikut:
1. Tesis adalah hakmilik Universiti Malaysia Sarawak.
2. Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak dibenarkan
membuat salinan untuk tujuan pengajian sahaja.
3. Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak dibenarkan
membuat pendigitan untuk membangunkan Pangkalan Data Kandungan Tempatan.
4. Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak dibenarkan
membuat salinan tesis ini sebagai bahan pertukaran antara institusi pengajian tinggi.
** sila tandakan ( )
SULIT
TERHAD
TIDAK TERHAD
___________________________ _________________________________
(TANDATANGAN PENULIS) (TANDATANGAN PENYELIA)
Alamat Tetap:
RH STEPHAN JUGAM,
SG SEBUBOK,ULU NIAH,
982OO NIAH, MIRI, SARAWAK
Tarikh : _______________________ Tarikh: _____________________________
Catatan: * Tesis dimaksudkan sebagai tesis bagi Ijazah Doktor Falsafah, Sarjana dan Sarjana Muda
*Jika tesis ini SULIT atau TERHAD, sila lampirkan surat daripada pihak berkuasa/organisasi berkenaan dengan menyatakan
sekali sebab dan tempoh tesis ini perlu dikelaskan sebagai TERHAD.
(Mengandungi maklumat yang berdarjah keselamatan atau
kepentingan seperti termaktub di dalam AKTA RAHSIA RASMI
1972)
(Mengandungi maklumat Terhad yang telah ditentukan oleh
organisasi/badan di mana penyelidikan dijalankan)
Gred:
Statement of Originality
The work described in this Final Year Project, entitled
“Language Anxiety in Learning English Among Undergraduates in UNIMAS”
is to the best of the author’s knowledge that of the author except
where due reference is made.
__________________ ___________________
(Date submitted) (Student’s signature)
Lee Yung Fook
14346
1
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.0 Chapter overview
This first chapter discusses the background of the study, the statement of the
problem, the research objectives, the significance of the study, the definition of terms and
the scope of the study.
1.1 Introduction
The Malaysian Ministry of Education has recognized English Language as a
second language and be taught as a compulsory subject in schools. Therefore, both
primary and secondary schools learn English as a second language. Although students in
Malaysia have been exposed to the language since they are in primary school until they
reach secondary school, many students still cannot master English language and feel
anxious when dealing with the language. This is because different races in our country
tend to speak their own mother tongue rather than English. English is learnt to pass exam
and for education purpose only. The feelings of anxiousness are common phenomenon in
the Malaysian English classroom especially among the weak students which will
eventually lessen their interest in learning the language. As mention by Worde (1998),
foreign language learning situations are prone to anxiety arousal. More than half of
foreign language learners experience some kinds of anxiety in their learning. It is also
argued that language anxiety may cause problems for language learners (Kondo & Ling,
2004).
2
1.2 Statement of problem
English is used as second language in Malaysia. English is viewed as an important
second language in University Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS); students might face
anxiety in using the language since English is not the first language students have learnt
in school.
Anxiety is viewed as a serious problem in foreign and second language learning,
probably experienced by one third to one half of the students (Worde, 1998). Some
studies, for example, (Chen & Chang, 2004; Pappamihiel, 2002) indicated that language
anxiety is proved to hinder student language acquisition and brought negative effect to
students performance and achievement. Pappamihiel (2002) state that students who feel
anxious tend not to involve in activity that would make them anxious. However, student
active involvement in foreign language learning is crucial for successful language
learning. This is indeed important that study to be carried out to find out the factors that
cause anxiety among ESL students to improve language learning in ESL classroom.
Therefore, this study is plan to find out the factors that contribute to ESL students
language anxiety from the perspective of UNIMAS English as second language (ESL)
students in learning English.
3
1.3 Aims and objectives of the study
The purpose of the study is to investigate language anxiety among ESL students
in UNIMAS and major factors that contribute to the students’ language anxiety in
learning English as second language.
This study will be guided by several objectives. The objectives of this study are to
find out:
1. Language anxiety level among ESL students in UNIMAS.
2. Language anxiety level differences in terms of gender, stream (arts and sciences),
and proficiency levels (MUET result) among the students.
3. Major factors that cause language anxiety among English as Second Language
(ESL) students in English classroom.
1.4 Significance of the study
Several studies have concluded that foreign language anxiety does have harmful
effect on learning in the foreign language classroom. (Horwitz, 2001; Worde, 1998). The
same situation that affect negatively learning in the foreign classroom are present in the
ESL classroom (Pappamihiel, 2002; Kondo and Ling, 2004; Muhammad Tanveer, 2007).
Pappamihiel (2002) mentioned that when learners see situations as threatening
and anxious to them, they would doubt their ability in performing tasks. This will evoke
anxiety reactions towards learning. This will negatively affect the language learning
because they would not perceive themselves as effective learners in taking advantage of
learning opportunities. As a result, they claimed to have a ‘mental block’ against
4
language learning and this will hinder them to succeed in learning a second language
(Papamihiel, 2002).
The result of this study can provide information about the language anxiety
experienced by the ESL students in UNIMAS. Instructors might be able to use the
information to develop teaching skills and strategies to lessen the language anxiety
experienced by students in the English courses classroom. With the study result, the
instructors can find ways to improve the classroom climate and encourage cooperative
learning in the classroom.
Worde (1998) suggested that anxiety can negatively affect the language learning
experience in numerous ways and that reducing anxiety seems to increase language
acquisition and learner motivation. Knowing the major factors that causes language
anxiety among the ESL learner can help both instructor and students to make language
learning more fun and less threatening.
1.5 Operational definition of terms
1.5.1 Language anxiety
Horwitz, Horwitz and Cope (1986) define language anxiety as “a
subjective feeling of tension, apprehension, nervousness and worry associated
with an arousal of the automatic nervous system” (pg.125 cited in pg. 18, Siti
Norfishah, 2005). Meanwhile, language anxiety, according to MacIntyre and
Gardner (1994) is the feeling of tension and apprehension experiences by
5
learners in the foreign language classroom. Likewise, Brown (1993) defines
language anxiety as a form of feeling associated with feelings of uneasiness,
frustrations, self-doubt, apprehension or worry.
1.5.2 Foreign language anxiety
Horwitz, Horwitz and Cope (1986) viewed that foreign language anxiety
as related to three aspects that are communication apprehension, fear of negative
evaluation, and test anxiety.
Firstly, communication apprehension (CA) refers to the feeling of fear that
refrains learners from communicating with other people. In short, learners who
experience communication are in hesitation to express their thoughts and ideas
fluently. Horwitz et al. (1986) define communication apprehension (CA) as “a
type of shyness characterized by fear or anxiety about communicating with
people” (pg. 128 cited in pg.11, Muhammad Tanveer, 2007).
Secondly, test anxiety refers to the students’ perception of their abilities to
accomplish the learning tasks or test. Horwitz et al. (1986) explained test anxiety
“refers to a type of performance anxiety stemming from a fear of failure” (pg.30
cited in pg. 13, Muhammad Tanveer, 2007). Siti Norfishah (2005) also
supported the phrase and mentioned that this kind of anxiety stems from a fear
of failure or apprehension over academic evaluation.
6
Thirdly, fear of negative evaluation refers to the fear of taking evaluations
made by other classmates and instructor about their performance and
competence in the language. It can be defined as ‘apprehension about others
evaluations, avoidance of evaluative situations and the expectation that others
would evaluate oneself negatively’ (pg.31 cited in pg.23, Siti Norfishah, 2005).
1.5.3 Programme
The faculties that offer programmes at undergraduate levels in UNIMAS are
listed as follow:
I. Faculty of Applied and Creative Arts (FACA)
II. Faculty of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development (FCSHD)
III. Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology (FCSIT)
IV. Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB)
V. Faculty of Engineering (FE)
VI. Faculty of Resource Science and Technology (FRST)
VII. Faculty of Social Sciences (FSS)
In this study, four faculties that are Faculty of Social Sciences (FSS),
Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Faculty of Cognitive sciences and
Human Development (FCSHD) and Faculty of Applied and Creative Arts
(FACA) will be grouped under art faculties. The Faculty of Engineering (FE) ,
Faculty of Computer Sciences and Information Technology (FCSIT), and
7
Faculty of Resource Sciences and Technology (FRST) will be grouped under
sciences faculties.
1.5.4 English generic courses
In UNIMAS, all undergraduates are required to register English generic
courses to fulfill the requirement upon completion of their studies in the campus.
For those undergraduates who had scored Band 3 and below in their Malaysian
University English Test (MUET), they need to enroll two compulsory English
generic courses that are English Preparatory 1 and English Preparatory 2 before
they can enroll for any other generic courses. By the end of their studies, these
undergraduates will have complete four English generic courses. On the other
hand, undergraduates with MUET band 4 and above are required to take only
two generic courses. They do not have to take preparatory 1 and English
Preparatory 2. There are seven generic courses offered in UNIMAS as showed
below:
I. Academic Reading and Writing (PBI 1032)
II. Creative Writing in English (PBI 1022)
III. English for Professional Purposes (PBI 1012)
IV. English for the Real World (PBI 1052)
V. English for Self-Expression (PBI 1062)
VI. Preparatory English 1 (PBI 0011)
VII. Preparatory English 2 (PBI 0021)
8
1.5.5 MUET
MUET is the acronym for Malaysian University English Test. MUET is a
compulsory examination and a requirement for admission for those who wish to
further study at the local universities in Malaysia. Besides, MUET is a test to
consolidate and enhance the English language ability of pre-university students
to enable them to perform effectively in their academic pursuits at tertiary level.
The exam is administered twice a year, in May and November.
The exam is designed to determine whether candidates have an adequate
level of English ability to follow undergraduate courses in the chosen field of
study. Four components that are tested in MUET examination are Listening,
Speaking, Reading and Writing.
The test will measure and report the students’ level of proficiency based
on the aggregated score range of zero to three hundred (0-300). Candidates are
placed on an aggregated score range with respect to six bands of achievement
i.e. Proficiency Levels One to Six (1-6). A statement of result will also be issued
to every candidate who has sat for the whole exam.
According to MUET handbook (Malaysian University English Test, Majlis
Peperiksaan Malaysia, 2001), students who obtained Band 1 are characterized as
“extremely limited user of the language and their command of the language are
regarded as extremely poor. Their ability to communicate is described as
9
inexpressive and inaccurate and as a result, they experienced frequent
breakdown in communication. That is also considered as having a poor
understanding of the language, therefore they hardly able to function in the
language’.
Students who obtained Band 2 are considered as “limited user who has a
limited command of the language. They lack expressiveness and appropriacy in
using the language thus resulting in frequent breakdowns in communication.
They also have a limited understanding of the language and this contributes to
their limited ability to function in the language”.
Band 3 students are characterized as “modest user who is considered as
having a fair command of the language. Their ability to communicate are fairly
expressive but with noticeable inaccuracies. They are able to understand the
language but with some misinterpretation”.
Band 4 students are characterized as “competent user who has satisfactory
command of the language. They are able to communicate in fluent, appropriate
but with occasional inaccuracies. They have satisfactory level of understanding
of the language.”