fall 2014 course evaluation - results · fall 2014 course evaluation - results section: a class...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Fall 2014 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: A
Class Number: 1180
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-GY 5493: Physics of Nanoelectronics
Primary Instructor: Wolf,Edward Response Rate: 6/10
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 6
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 6
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 16.7% 83.3% 4.3 6
Q10 The Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 16.7% 83.3% 4.3 6
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 16.7% 83.3% 4.3 6
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 16.7% 83.3% 4.3 6
D1. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 83.3% 16.7% 4.5 6
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 16.7% 66.7% 4.2 16.7% 6
G1. Course Difficulty:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 66.7% 16.7% 4.5 16.7% 6
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 16.7% 83.3% 4.3 6
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 16.7% 83.3% 4.3 6
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 16.7% 83.3% 4.3 6
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
29-April-2015
-
Fall 2014 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: A
Class Number: 2071
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-GY 6673: QUANTUM MECHANICS I
Primary Instructor: DiBartolo,Salvatore J Response Rate: 1/9
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 1
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 1
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 4.0 100.0% 1
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 1
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 2.0 1
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 4.0 100.0% 1
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.0 100.0% 1
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 100.0% 1.0 1
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 4.0 100.0% 1
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 3.0 1
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
29-April-2015
-
Fall 2014 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: A
Class Number: 1352
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 1002: Physics: The Genesis of Technology
Primary Instructor: Becker,Kurt H Response Rate: 1/18
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 1
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 1
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 4.0 100.0% 1
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 1.0 1
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 3.0 1
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 4.0 100.0% 1
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 3.0 1
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 100.0% 5.0 1
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 4.0 100.0% 1
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 1.0 1
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
29-April-2015
-
Fall 2014 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: A1LC
Class Number: 1580
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 1013: MECHANICS
Primary Instructor: Mugglin,David Response Rate: 7/73
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 75.0% 25.0% 4
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 14.3% 71.4% 14.3% 7
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 57.1% 4.6 42.9% 7
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 28.6% 28.6% 4.0 42.9% 7
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 42.9% 14.3% 4.3 42.9% 7
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 28.6% 14.3% 28.6% 3.7 28.6% 7
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 14.3% 28.6% 14.3% 3.7 42.9% 7
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 14.3% 42.9% 3.1 42.9% 7
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 28.6% 14.3% 4.0 57.1% 7
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 25.0% 50.0% 3.8 25.0% 4
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 28.6% 14.3% 4.1 57.1% 7
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
29-April-2015
-
Fall 2014 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: A2LC
Class Number: 1582
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 1013: MECHANICS
Primary Instructor: Mugglin,David Response Rate: 7/73
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 75.0% 25.0% 4
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 14.3% 71.4% 14.3% 7
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 57.1% 4.6 42.9% 7
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 28.6% 28.6% 4.0 42.9% 7
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 42.9% 14.3% 4.3 42.9% 7
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 28.6% 14.3% 28.6% 3.7 28.6% 7
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 14.3% 28.6% 14.3% 3.7 42.9% 7
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 14.3% 42.9% 3.1 42.9% 7
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 28.6% 14.3% 4.0 57.1% 7
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 25.0% 50.0% 3.8 25.0% 4
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 28.6% 14.3% 4.1 57.1% 7
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
29-April-2015
-
Fall 2014 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: A3LC
Class Number: 2066
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 1013: MECHANICS
Primary Instructor: Mugglin,David Response Rate: 7/73
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 75.0% 25.0% 4
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 14.3% 71.4% 14.3% 7
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 57.1% 4.6 42.9% 7
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 28.6% 28.6% 4.0 42.9% 7
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 42.9% 14.3% 4.3 42.9% 7
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 28.6% 14.3% 28.6% 3.7 28.6% 7
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 14.3% 28.6% 14.3% 3.7 42.9% 7
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 14.3% 42.9% 3.1 42.9% 7
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 28.6% 14.3% 4.0 57.1% 7
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 25.0% 50.0% 3.8 25.0% 4
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 28.6% 14.3% 4.1 57.1% 7
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
29-April-2015
-
Fall 2014 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: B1LC
Class Number: 1584
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 1013: MECHANICS
Primary Instructor: Tsifrinovich,Vladimir Response Rate: 9/57
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 9
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 9
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 11.1% 44.4% 11.1% 3.9 33.3% 9
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 11.1% 33.3% 11.1% 3.8 44.4% 9
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 11.1% 55.6% 11.1% 4.1 22.2% 9
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 55.6% 11.1% 11.1% 4.2 22.2% 9
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 11.1% 44.4% 22.2% 3.9 22.2% 9
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 11.1% 22.2% 22.2% 11.1% 3.3 33.3% 9
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 44.4% 22.2% 11.1% 3.9 22.2% 9
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 11.1% 33.3% 22.2% 11.1% 3.4 22.2% 9
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 11.1% 22.2% 11.1% 11.1% 3.6 44.4% 9
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 11.1% 11.1% 11.1% 22.2% 3.3 44.4% 9
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 11.1% 22.2% 22.2% 11.1% 3.3 33.3% 9
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
29-April-2015
-
Fall 2014 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: B2LC
Class Number: 1586
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 1013: MECHANICS
Primary Instructor: Tsifrinovich,Vladimir Response Rate: 9/57
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 9
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 9
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 11.1% 44.4% 11.1% 3.9 33.3% 9
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 11.1% 33.3% 11.1% 3.8 44.4% 9
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 11.1% 55.6% 11.1% 4.1 22.2% 9
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 55.6% 11.1% 11.1% 4.2 22.2% 9
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 11.1% 44.4% 22.2% 3.9 22.2% 9
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 11.1% 22.2% 22.2% 11.1% 3.3 33.3% 9
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 44.4% 22.2% 11.1% 3.9 22.2% 9
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 11.1% 33.3% 22.2% 11.1% 3.4 22.2% 9
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 11.1% 22.2% 11.1% 11.1% 3.6 44.4% 9
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 11.1% 11.1% 11.1% 22.2% 3.3 44.4% 9
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 11.1% 22.2% 22.2% 11.1% 3.3 33.3% 9
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
29-April-2015
-
Fall 2014 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: B3LC
Class Number: 1727
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 1013: MECHANICS
Primary Instructor: Tsifrinovich,Vladimir Response Rate: 9/57
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 9
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 9
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 11.1% 44.4% 11.1% 3.9 33.3% 9
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 11.1% 33.3% 11.1% 3.8 44.4% 9
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 11.1% 55.6% 11.1% 4.1 22.2% 9
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 55.6% 11.1% 11.1% 4.2 22.2% 9
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 11.1% 44.4% 22.2% 3.9 22.2% 9
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 11.1% 22.2% 22.2% 11.1% 3.3 33.3% 9
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 44.4% 22.2% 11.1% 3.9 22.2% 9
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 11.1% 33.3% 22.2% 11.1% 3.4 22.2% 9
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 11.1% 22.2% 11.1% 11.1% 3.6 44.4% 9
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 11.1% 11.1% 11.1% 22.2% 3.3 44.4% 9
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 11.1% 22.2% 22.2% 11.1% 3.3 33.3% 9
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
29-April-2015
-
Fall 2014 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: ALEC
Class Number: 1570
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 1223: ELECTRICITY AND LIGHT
Primary Instructor: Shopova,Siyka Response Rate: 4/12
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 4
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 4
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 50.0% 25.0% 2.8 25.0% 4
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 25.0% 3.8 75.0% 4
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 25.0% 50.0% 3.8 25.0% 4
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 25.0% 25.0% 4.0 50.0% 4
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 3.3 4
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 25.0% 50.0% 3.8 25.0% 4
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 25.0% 50.0% 3.0 25.0% 4
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 3.3 25.0% 4
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 25.0% 75.0% 2.8 4
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
29-April-2015
-
Fall 2014 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: A1LC
Class Number: 1603
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 2023: ELECTRICITY, MAGNETISM, & FLUIDS
Primary Instructor: DiBartolo,Salvatore J Response Rate: 14/100
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 14
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 92.9% 7.1% 14
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 14
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 42.9% 7.1% 28.6% 4.2 21.4% 14
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 14
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 14
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 71.4% 7.1% 4.6 21.4% 14
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 50.0% 7.1% 4.4 42.9% 14
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 57.1% 7.1% 7.1% 4.4 28.6% 14
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 42.9% 7.1% 4.4 50.0% 14
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 7.1% 4.5 42.9% 14
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 14
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 7.1% 7.1% 4.5 35.7% 14
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
29-April-2015
-
Fall 2014 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: A2LC
Class Number: 1605
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 2023: ELECTRICITY, MAGNETISM, & FLUIDS
Primary Instructor: DiBartolo,Salvatore J Response Rate: 14/100
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 14
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 92.9% 7.1% 14
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 14
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 42.9% 7.1% 28.6% 4.2 21.4% 14
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 14
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 14
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 71.4% 7.1% 4.6 21.4% 14
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 50.0% 7.1% 4.4 42.9% 14
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 57.1% 7.1% 7.1% 4.4 28.6% 14
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 42.9% 7.1% 4.4 50.0% 14
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 7.1% 4.5 42.9% 14
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 14
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 7.1% 7.1% 4.5 35.7% 14
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
29-April-2015
-
Fall 2014 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: A3LC
Class Number: 1607
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 2023: ELECTRICITY, MAGNETISM, & FLUIDS
Primary Instructor: DiBartolo,Salvatore J Response Rate: 14/100
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 14
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 92.9% 7.1% 14
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 14
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 42.9% 7.1% 28.6% 4.2 21.4% 14
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 14
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 14
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 71.4% 7.1% 4.6 21.4% 14
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 50.0% 7.1% 4.4 42.9% 14
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 57.1% 7.1% 7.1% 4.4 28.6% 14
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 42.9% 7.1% 4.4 50.0% 14
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 7.1% 4.5 42.9% 14
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 14
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 7.1% 7.1% 4.5 35.7% 14
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
29-April-2015
-
Fall 2014 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: A4LC
Class Number: 2028
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 2023: ELECTRICITY, MAGNETISM, & FLUIDS
Primary Instructor: DiBartolo,Salvatore J Response Rate: 14/100
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 14
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 92.9% 7.1% 14
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 14
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 42.9% 7.1% 28.6% 4.2 21.4% 14
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 14
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 14
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 71.4% 7.1% 4.6 21.4% 14
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 50.0% 7.1% 4.4 42.9% 14
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 57.1% 7.1% 7.1% 4.4 28.6% 14
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 42.9% 7.1% 4.4 50.0% 14
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 7.1% 4.5 42.9% 14
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 14
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 7.1% 7.1% 4.5 35.7% 14
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
29-April-2015
-
Fall 2014 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: B1LC
Class Number: 1609
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 2023: ELECTRICITY, MAGNETISM, & FLUIDS
Primary Instructor: Mugglin,David Response Rate: 15/99
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 15
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 93.3% 6.7% 15
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 93.3% 6.7% 4.9 15
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 60.0% 20.0% 4.4 20.0% 15
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 46.7% 26.7% 6.7% 3.9 20.0% 15
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 60.0% 6.7% 13.3% 4.3 20.0% 15
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 46.7% 6.7% 6.7% 4.3 40.0% 15
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 33.3% 6.7% 13.3% 4.1 46.7% 15
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 6.7% 60.0% 20.0% 4.2 13.3% 15
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 6.7% 33.3% 13.3% 13.3% 3.7 33.3% 15
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 53.3% 6.7% 6.7% 4.3 33.3% 15
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 66.7% 6.7% 4.6 26.7% 15
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 46.7% 13.3% 4.3 40.0% 15
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
29-April-2015
-
Fall 2014 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: B2LC
Class Number: 1611
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 2023: ELECTRICITY, MAGNETISM, & FLUIDS
Primary Instructor: Mugglin,David Response Rate: 15/99
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 15
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 93.3% 6.7% 15
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 93.3% 6.7% 4.9 15
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 60.0% 20.0% 4.4 20.0% 15
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 46.7% 26.7% 6.7% 3.9 20.0% 15
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 60.0% 6.7% 13.3% 4.3 20.0% 15
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 46.7% 6.7% 6.7% 4.3 40.0% 15
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 33.3% 6.7% 13.3% 4.1 46.7% 15
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 6.7% 60.0% 20.0% 4.2 13.3% 15
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 6.7% 33.3% 13.3% 13.3% 3.7 33.3% 15
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 53.3% 6.7% 6.7% 4.3 33.3% 15
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 66.7% 6.7% 4.6 26.7% 15
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 46.7% 13.3% 4.3 40.0% 15
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
29-April-2015
-
Fall 2014 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: B3LC
Class Number: 1613
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 2023: ELECTRICITY, MAGNETISM, & FLUIDS
Primary Instructor: Mugglin,David Response Rate: 15/99
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 15
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 93.3% 6.7% 15
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 93.3% 6.7% 4.9 15
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 60.0% 20.0% 4.4 20.0% 15
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 46.7% 26.7% 6.7% 3.9 20.0% 15
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 60.0% 6.7% 13.3% 4.3 20.0% 15
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 46.7% 6.7% 6.7% 4.3 40.0% 15
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 33.3% 6.7% 13.3% 4.1 46.7% 15
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 6.7% 60.0% 20.0% 4.2 13.3% 15
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 6.7% 33.3% 13.3% 13.3% 3.7 33.3% 15
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 53.3% 6.7% 6.7% 4.3 33.3% 15
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 66.7% 6.7% 4.6 26.7% 15
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 46.7% 13.3% 4.3 40.0% 15
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
29-April-2015
-
Fall 2014 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: B4LC
Class Number: 2030
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 2023: ELECTRICITY, MAGNETISM, & FLUIDS
Primary Instructor: Mugglin,David Response Rate: 15/99
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 15
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 93.3% 6.7% 15
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 93.3% 6.7% 4.9 15
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 60.0% 20.0% 4.4 20.0% 15
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 46.7% 26.7% 6.7% 3.9 20.0% 15
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 60.0% 6.7% 13.3% 4.3 20.0% 15
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 46.7% 6.7% 6.7% 4.3 40.0% 15
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 33.3% 6.7% 13.3% 4.1 46.7% 15
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 6.7% 60.0% 20.0% 4.2 13.3% 15
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 6.7% 33.3% 13.3% 13.3% 3.7 33.3% 15
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 53.3% 6.7% 6.7% 4.3 33.3% 15
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 66.7% 6.7% 4.6 26.7% 15
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 46.7% 13.3% 4.3 40.0% 15
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
29-April-2015
-
Fall 2014 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: C1LC
Class Number: 1615
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 2023: ELECTRICITY, MAGNETISM, & FLUIDS
Primary Instructor: Ostrovsky,Vladimir Response Rate: 3/62
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 3
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 3
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 66.7% 33.3% 4.3 3
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 3
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 3
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 3
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 100.0% 5.0 3
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 3
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
29-April-2015
-
Fall 2014 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: C2LC
Class Number: 1617
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 2023: ELECTRICITY, MAGNETISM, & FLUIDS
Primary Instructor: Ostrovsky,Vladimir Response Rate: 3/62
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 3
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 3
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 66.7% 33.3% 4.3 3
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 3
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 3
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 3
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 100.0% 5.0 3
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 3
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
29-April-2015
-
Fall 2014 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: C3LC
Class Number: 1619
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 2023: ELECTRICITY, MAGNETISM, & FLUIDS
Primary Instructor: Ostrovsky,Vladimir Response Rate: 3/62
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 3
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 3
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 66.7% 33.3% 4.3 3
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 3
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 3
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 3
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 100.0% 5.0 3
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 3
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
29-April-2015
-
Fall 2014 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: B1
Class Number: 20137
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 2031: General Physics Laboratory II
Primary Instructor: Fried,Peter Response Rate: 2/15
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at
the beginning of the laboratory program
50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 50.0% 50.0% 3.0 2
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 2.5 50.0% 2
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 4.0 100.0% 2
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 50.0% 3.0 2
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 50.0% 3.0 2
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A06 I have enhanced my ability to analyze and interpret data appropriately. 50.0% 2.5 50.0% 2
A17 I have enhanced my ability to conduct experiments to validate hypotheses and
theories.
50.0% 2.5 50.0% 2
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
29-April-2015
-
Fall 2014 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: B2
Class Number: 20138
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 2031: General Physics Laboratory II
Primary Instructor: Fried,Peter Response Rate: 1/13
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at
the beginning of the laboratory program
100.0% 5.0 1
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 4.0 100.0% 1
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 4.0 100.0% 1
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 4.0 100.0% 1
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 4.0 100.0% 1
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 4.0 100.0% 1
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.0 100.0% 1
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 100.0% 1.0 1
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 3.0 1
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 4.0 100.0% 1
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 2.0 1
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A06 I have enhanced my ability to analyze and interpret data appropriately. 4.0 100.0% 1
A17 I have enhanced my ability to conduct experiments to validate hypotheses and
theories.
4.0 100.0% 1
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
29-April-2015
-
Fall 2014 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: C1
Class Number: 20139
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 2031: General Physics Laboratory II
Primary Instructor: Dulub,Olga Response Rate: 2/14
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at
the beginning of the laboratory program
50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 100.0% 5.0 2
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 50.0% 3.5 50.0% 2
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 50.0% 3.0 50.0% 2
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 4.0 100.0% 2
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 4.0 100.0% 2
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 3.5 50.0% 2
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 50.0% 3.0 50.0% 2
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 4.0 100.0% 2
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A06 I have enhanced my ability to analyze and interpret data appropriately. 4.0 100.0% 2
A17 I have enhanced my ability to conduct experiments to validate hypotheses and
theories.
4.0 100.0% 2
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
29-April-2015
-
Fall 2014 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: C2
Class Number: 20140
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 2031: General Physics Laboratory II
Primary Instructor: Dulub,Olga Response Rate: 1/16
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at
the beginning of the laboratory program
100.0% 5.0 1
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 100.0% 5.0 1
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 2.0 1
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 100.0% 5.0 1
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 1
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 4.0 100.0% 1
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 1
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 100.0% 2.0 1
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 4.0 100.0% 1
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 100.0% 2.0 1
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 4.0 100.0% 1
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A06 I have enhanced my ability to analyze and interpret data appropriately. 100.0% 5.0 1
A17 I have enhanced my ability to conduct experiments to validate hypotheses and
theories.
100.0% 5.0 1
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
29-April-2015
-
Fall 2014 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: D1
Class Number: 20141
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 2031: General Physics Laboratory II
Primary Instructor: Dulub,Olga Response Rate: 2/16
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at
the beginning of the laboratory program
50.0% 50.0% 3.5 2
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 50.0% 2.5 50.0% 2
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 50.0% 50.0% 3.0 2
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 50.0% 2.5 50.0% 2
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 50.0% 50.0% 4.0 2
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 50.0% 50.0% 1.0 2
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 50.0% 1.0 2
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 100.0% 1.0 2
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 50.0% 2.0 2
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 50.0% 50.0% 3.0 2
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 1.0 2
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A06 I have enhanced my ability to analyze and interpret data appropriately. 4.0 100.0% 1
A17 I have enhanced my ability to conduct experiments to validate hypotheses and
theories.
4.0 100.0% 1
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
29-April-2015
-
Fall 2014 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: D2
Class Number: 20142
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 2031: General Physics Laboratory II
Primary Instructor: Dulub,Olga Response Rate: 3/16
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at
the beginning of the laboratory program
66.7% 33.3% 4.3 3
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 33.3% 33.3% 3.7 33.3% 3
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 3.5 50.0% 2
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 50.0% 50.0% 4.0 2
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 4.0 100.0% 2
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A06 I have enhanced my ability to analyze and interpret data appropriately. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
A17 I have enhanced my ability to conduct experiments to validate hypotheses and
theories.
33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
29-April-2015
-
Fall 2014 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: E1
Class Number: 20143
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 2031: General Physics Laboratory II
Primary Instructor: Fried,Peter Response Rate: 5/15
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at
the beginning of the laboratory program
100.0% 5.0 5
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 5
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 100.0% 5.0 5
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 5
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 5
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 60.0% 20.0% 4.4 20.0% 5
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 20.0% 60.0% 3.6 20.0% 5
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 40.0% 4.4 60.0% 5
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 20.0% 40.0% 3.8 40.0% 5
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A06 I have enhanced my ability to analyze and interpret data appropriately. 40.0% 4.4 60.0% 5
A17 I have enhanced my ability to conduct experiments to validate hypotheses and
theories.
60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
29-April-2015
-
Fall 2014 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: A1LC
Class Number: 1735
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 2033: WAVES, OPTICS, & THERMODYNAMICS
Primary Instructor: Ostrovsky,Vladimir Response Rate: 10/59
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 10.0% 90.0% 10
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 20.0% 80.0% 10
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 10.0% 60.0% 20.0% 3.9 10.0% 10
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 30.0% 30.0% 20.0% 3.2 20.0% 10
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 40.0% 10.0% 30.0% 3.9 20.0% 10
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 30.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.0 50.0% 10
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 30.0% 10.0% 4.2 60.0% 10
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 20.0% 4.3 30.0% 10
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 20.0% 10.0% 4.1 70.0% 10
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 60.0% 10.0% 4.5 30.0% 10
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 20.0% 30.0% 20.0% 20.0% 3.1 10.0% 10
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 10.0% 4.4 40.0% 10
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
29-Apr