fantasy football draft strategy

Upload: pgross31

Post on 03-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 Fantasy Football Draft Strategy

    1/5

    Its that time of the year when serious fantasy heads start thinking about the upcoming footb

    season. With fantasy drafts roughly six to eight weeks away, the dedicated managers begin their

    preparation and strategy. For the insanely obsessed, we have been reading and gathering informat

    since the end of last fantasy season. Its not so much a passion as it is a way of life.

    I love fantasy football, let me get that out of the way. I created a Twitter account solely for th

    purpose of reading and following my favorite football writers. With that being said, respected writer

    and tweeters alike have differing opinions about how to approach the draft. This is inevitable, to ea

    his own. And while it fluctuates year by year, with positional depth and league scoring playing huge

    determining factors, Ive found that given similar or identical parameters, opinions from successfulexperts are still drastically different.

    What I wanted to do was conduct my own research to determine the validity of the varying dr

    strategies Ive been reading about. To put it simply, I focused on the first 2 draft selections of 36

    different mock drafts. The combination of these first 2 selections is listed below. Picks 3-16 of each

    draft was done through the best player available to fill my starting roster, DST and kickers excluded

    Taking that into consideration, if there was no available spot in my starting lineup I bypassed player

    with a slightly higher ADP, in order to select the best player available at a position that needed to be

    filled in my starting lineup.

    To complete this study, I used the FantasyPros Mock Draft Simulator, which lets you draft agaexperts, ADP, or a combination of both. I chose to draft using the combination of experts and ADP,

    felt that this was a more well-rounded approach to my data collection. I figured people in an ordina

    draft rely on cheat sheets, but will also use their gut instinct at times as well (or at least should). I

    thought this feature gave the most realistic interpretation of that scenario.

    The combinations I focused on for each of the first 2 selections of the drafts are as follows:

    RB/RB

    RB/WR

    RB/TE

    WR/WR QB/TE

    QB early (1st or 2nd round, paired with best available player at any position except TE)

    In order to get accurate data, I did each of these combinations drafting from the 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8

    10th and 12th slots in the draft order of a 12-team mock. So with the 6 position combinations and 6

    draft positions, you get 36 mock drafts. To calculate each starting rosters total points, I used ESPN

    2013 projected points for each player. For the purposes of my own leagues scoring, I wanted to co

    QB passing tds as 6 points. However, the Draft Simulator point assignments were defaulted at 4 po

    QB tds and couldnt be changed. Therefore, the simulator drafted QBs assuming passing tds were 4

    points. If your league has 6 point passing tds, youre going to have to assume quarterbacks will be

    drafted earlier. How much earlier depends on the people drafting with you and their draft strategie

    but keep that in mind regardless. Additionally, any drafts that included Rob Gronkowski (health) an

    Aaron Hernandez (legal) were under the assumption of a 16 game season despite their respective

    issues. While Gronk at least has a chance at a 16 game season, Hernandez unfortunately does not.

    included each players projected point totals in parentheses. Here are the results:

    2nd Pick:

    RB/RB RB/WR RB/TE WR/WR QB/TE Q

    earlyQB- Stafford (288) QB- E. Manning (232) QB- Luck (280) QB- Wilson (294) QB- Rodgers (352) QB

    Newton (323)

  • 7/28/2019 Fantasy Football Draft Strategy

    2/5

    RB- Foster (261) RB- Foster (261) RB- Foster (261) RB- Bush (155) RB- Miller

    RB- Foster (261)

    RB- McFadden (168) RB- Sproles (154) RB- Bell (133) RB- Sproles (154) RB- Sproles (154) RB

    Sproles (154)

    WR- Harvin (177) WR- D. Thomas (180) WR- J. Jones (186) WR- C. Johnson (236) WR- D. Tho

    (180) WR- Harvin (177)

    WR- Nelson (154) WR- Harvin (177) WR- Nelson (154) WR- D. Thomas (180) WR- S. Smith (137

    WR- Nelson (154)

    TE- Gonzalez (133) TE- Pitta (107) TE- Gronk (173) TE- Rudolph (98) TE- Gronk (173) TE

    Pitta (107)

    Flex- Wallace (154) Flex- Wallace (154) Flex- S. Smith (137) Flex- Harvin (177) Flex- Shorts (131)

    Flex Wallace (154)

    Total: 1,335 points Total: 1,265 points Total: 1,324 points Total: 1,294 points Total: 1,2

    points Total: 1,330 points

    Best Draft: RB/RB

    Point differential from highest total to lowest total: 70 points

    Point differential between highest and 2nd highest total: 5

    4th Pick:

    RB/RB RB/WR RB/TE WR/WR QB/TE Q

    earlyQB- Luck (280) QB- Luck (280) QB- Luck (280) QB- Luck (280) QB- Rodgers (352) Q

    Brady (336)

    RB- Martin (226) RB- McFadden (168) RB- Charles (228) RB- Bush (154) RB- C. Johnson (17

    RB- Charles (228)

    RB- Forte (182) RB- Forte (182) RB- Bush (154) RB- Sproles (154) RB- Bush (154) RB

    Sproles (154)

    WR- Harvin (177) WR- C. Johnson (236) WR- D. Thomas (180) WR- C. Johnson (236) WR- Nicks (126)

    WR- D. Thomas (180)

    WR- Wallace (154) WR- Colston (150) WR- Colston (150) WR- D. Thomas (180) WR- S.Smith (154)

    WR- Nelson (154)

    TE- Gonzalez (133) TE- Gonzalez (133) TE- Gronk (173) TE- Pitta (107) TE- Gronk

    TE- Gonzalez (133)Flex- Sproles (154) Flex- Nicks (124) Flex- Ivory (128) Flex- Harvin (177) Flex- Ivory (128) Fle

    Wallace (154)

    Total: 1,306 points Total: 1,273 points Total: 1,293 points Total: 1,288 points Total: 1,

    points Total: 1,339 points

    Best Draft: QB early

    Point differential from highest total to lowest total: 80 points

    Point differential between highest and 2nd highest total: 33 points

    6th Pick:

    RB/RB RB/WR RB/TE WR/WR QB/TE Q

    earlyQB- Romo (284) QB- Luck (280) QB- Stafford (288) QB- Stafford (288) QB- Brees

    (334) QB- Brady (336)

    RB- Martin (226) RB- Spiller (227) RB- Charles (228) RB- Sproles (154) RB- Sproles (154)

    RB- Lynch (233)

    RB- C. Johnson (172) RB- McFadden (168) RB- Sproles (154) RB- Ivory (128) RB- Mendenhall (119) RB- Miller

    WR- Harvin (177) WR- J. Jones (186) WR- A. Johnson (177) WR- C. Johnson (236) WR- Harvin (177)

    WR- Harvin (177)

    WR- Colston (150) WR- Harvin (177) WR- Nicks (126) WR- J. Jones (186) WR- Nelson (154)

    WR- Nelson (154)

    TE- Gonzalez (133) TE- Gonzalez (133) TE- Graham (174) TE- Gonzalez (133) TE- Graham (174)

    TE- Gonzalez (133)

    Flex- Sproles (154) Flex- Sproles (154) Flex- Wallace (154) Flex- Harvin (177) Flex- Amendola (1

    Flex- S. Smith (137)

  • 7/28/2019 Fantasy Football Draft Strategy

    3/5

    Total: 1,296 points Total: 1,325 points Total: 1,301 points Total: 1,302 points Total:

    1,237points Total: 1,308 points

    Best Draft: RB/WR

    Point differential from highest total to lowest total: 88 points

    Point differential from highest total to 2nd highest total: 17 points

    8th Pick:

    RB/RB RB/WR RB/TE WR/WR QB/TE Q

    early

    QB- Romo (284) QB- Newton (323) QB- Luck (280) QB- Stafford (288) QB- Rodgers (352)QB- Brady (336)

    RB- Charles (228) RB- Martin (226) RB- Lynch (233) RB- Sproles (155) RB- Murray (151)

    RB- Charles (228)

    RB- Forte (182) RB- Bell (133) RB- Sproles (154) RB- Ivory (128) RB- Miller (138) RB- Bush (

    WR- Harvin (177) WR- Bryant (202) WR- Harvin (177) WR- C. Johnson (236) WR- A. Johnson (177) WR

    Thomas (180)

    WR- Wallace (154) WR- Cobb (171) WR- Wallace (177) WR- Marshall (196) WR- Wallace (154)

    WR- Wallace (154)

    TE- Witten (123) TE- Gonzalez (133) TE- Graham (174) TE- Olsen (98) TE- Graham (174)

    TE- Rudolph (98)

    Flex- Bush (155) Flex- Wallace (154) Flex- Matthews (140) Flex- D. Thomas (180) Flex- Shorts (138)

    Flex- Sproles (154)

    Total: 1,303 points Total: 1,342 points Total: 1,335 points Total: 1,281 points Total: 1,2points Total: 1,305 points

    Best Draft: RB/WR

    Point differential from highest total to lowest total: 61 points

    Point differential from highest total to 2nd highest total: 7 points

    10th Pick:

    RB/RB RB/WR RB/TE WR/WR QB/TE Q

    earlyQB- Stafford (288) QB- Romo (284) QB- Wilson (294) QB- Wilson (294) QB- Rodgers (352

    QB- Brees (334)

    RB- Rice (232) RB- Spiller (227) RB- Richardson (226) RB- Bush (155) RB- Murray (151) RB- McCoy(200)

    RB- Morris (219) RB- McFadden (168) RB- Ivory (128) RB- Bell (133) RB- Miller (138)

    RB- Miller (138)

    WR- White (177) WR- Bryant (202) WR- Harvin (177) WR- Green (201) WR- A. Johnson (1

    WR- A. Johnson (177)

    WR- Cruz (152) WR- Harvin (177) WR- Cobb (171) WR- Bryant (202) WR- Wallace (154) WR

    Cobb (171)

    TE- Pitta (107) TE- Gonzalez (138) TE- Graham (174) TE- Gonzalez (133) TE- Graham (174

    TE- Gonzalez (133)

    Flex- S. Johnson (128) Flex- Sproles (154) Flex- Antonio Brown (134) Flex- Harvin (177) Flex- Shorts (138

    Flex- Wallace (154)

    Total: 1,303 points Total: 1,350 points Total: 1,304 points Total: 1,295 points Total: 1,

    points Total: 1,307 points

    Best Draft: RB/WR

    Point differential from highest total to lowest total: 66 points

    Point differential from highest total to 2nd highest total: 43 points

    12th Pick:

    RB/RB RB/WR RB/TE WR/WR QB

    QB earlyQB- Romo (284) QB- Stafford (288) QB- Romo (284) QB- Stafford (288) QB- Rodgers (35

    QB- Brees (334)

  • 7/28/2019 Fantasy Football Draft Strategy

    4/5

    RB- Morris (219) RB- Richardson (226)RB- Morris (219) RB- Bush (154) RB- Jones-Drew (172)RB

    Morris (219)

    RB- Forte (182) RB- Bush (154) RB- Bush (154) RB- McFadden (168) RB- McFadden (168) RB

    Bush (154)

    WR- Cobb (171) WR- Green (201) WR- Cobb (171) WR- Green (201) WR- V. Jackson (175)

    WR- White (177)

    WR- Cruz (152) WR- Harvin (177) WR- Decker (134) WR- Bryant (202) WR- Wallace (15

    WR- Decker (134)

    TE- Pitta (98) TE- Gonzalez (133) TE- Graham (174) TE- Daniels (98) TE- Graham (174) TE

    Gonzalez (133)

    Flex- Wallace (154) Flex- Garcon (123) Flex- Wallace (154) Flex- Ball (162) Flex- T. Smith (138) Fle

    Smith (137)

    Total: 1,260 points Total: 1,302 points Total: 1,290 points Total: 1,273 points Total:

    1,333 points Total: 1,288 points

    Best Draft: QB/TE

    Point differential from highest total to lowest total: 73 points

    Point differential from highest total to 2nd highest total: 31 points

    DATA SUMMARY

    PickNumber

    Combination withgreatest startingroster points

    Point differentialfrom highest tolowest total

    Pointdifferentialfrom highest to2nd highest

    total2 RB/RB 70 54 QB early 80 336 RB/WR 88 178 RB/WR 61 710 RB/WR 66 4312 QB/TE 73 31

    While this data collection is only from a one-time experiment, what I found interesting was th

    differences in points from the highest total to the second highest total. That is a more telling indica

    of the quality of team drafted shown by the separation between the 1st and 2nd place team. So while

    RB/RB totaled the highest total points while drafting from the 2nd spot (1,335), the difference from

    RB/RB and going with a QB early (Rodgers/Brees) is only 5 points. Therefore, one might conclude thgoing QB early while drafting from the 2nd spot is the safer play because you essentially eliminate in

    to your #1 pick (but not all the time, ie Brady 2008). This strategy is in direct contrast to what JJ

    Zachariason and other advocates of drafting a QB late or even streaming QBs would do. Im not

    supporting nor attacking any strategy, just providing something to consider.

    On the flip side, there is a 43 point differential from the highest and 2 nd highest total while

    drafting from the 10th spot. In this experiment, RB/WR provided the highest point total, and a

    significant advantage over the second highest point total. To further the findings, of the 6 different

    draft slots (2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th, 10th, 12th), the RB/WR combination recorded the highest point total in 3 of

    them. Again, all of these numbers may end up being arbitrary because of the small sample size. I a

    going to repeat the entire process and chart the same data in order to see if these conclusions are vand consistent.

    Some food for thought regarding the findings:

    1. Ive found that on drafts where I went WR/WR in the first two rounds, the best player on the

    board in the third round was another dynamic WR such as Damaryius Thomas or Percy Havin

    This makes for a high upside flex play in my opinion. The downside is you have to draft your

    wisely in the next few rounds to make up for the lack of strength that the top RBs offer.

    2. Ive found that when spending a high pick on a QB, TE or both, my bench was very thin. Guy

    who would be a luxury to have on your bench in case of injury are now finding their way into

    your starting lineup. So you have to weigh the cost benefit analysis for either decision.

  • 7/28/2019 Fantasy Football Draft Strategy

    5/5

    3. Even after Graham and Gronk, I still valued tight ends fairly significantly. After Graham and

    Gronk were taken by other teams, I still targeted Witten or Gonzalez in rounds 5-6. Those wh

    believe in guys like Jared Cook, Jordan Cameron or Martellus Bennett this year can wait anoth

    4-6 rounds for a tight end and grab another skill player instead, while possibly getting

    comparable production at the tight end position.

    4. These drafts were completed before Hernandez was arrested, and therefore he was drafted

    under the assumption of a 16 game season. Widely believed to be the third tight end taken o

    the board, there is a chance that guys like Witten and Gonzalez would not have been availab

    the 6th round, which is when I was drafting them. This would alter rosters to a degree.

    After I complete this entire process a second time, it will hopefully provide more insight as to

    whether or not these findings are consistent. Not only will I look to determine consistency latera

    (Did RB/WR still give me the highest total from the 8th slot the second time I drafted?), but also I

    compare combinations vertically as well (Comparing RB/WR from the 8th slot the 1st time drafting

    the 2nd time drafting)