farm structures - european commission
TRANSCRIPT
1
Farm structures
Content 1. EU farms - characteristics and trends .................................................................................................................................................................................. 3
Physical farm size ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4
Economic farm size ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 8
Declining farm numbers ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 11
Organisational structure ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 13
Land ownership .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 14
Farm types and specialisation ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 15
Land use by farm type .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16
Standard output by farm type ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 17
Structural diversity of farming.............................................................................................................................................................................................. 18
2. The agricultural labour force ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 20 How many people work in EU agriculture? ......................................................................................................................................................................... 20
Evolution of agricultural labour input .................................................................................................................................................................................. 21
Age of farmers ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 23
Age and farm size – an inverse correlation? ......................................................................................................................................................................... 25
Gender of farmers ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 26
Working patterns .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 26
This document does not necessarily represent the official views of the European Commission
Contact: DG Agriculture and Rural Development, Unit Farm Economics
Tel: +32-2-29 91111 / E-mail: [email protected]
© European Union, 2018 - Reproduction authorised provided the source is acknowledged
2
Figures
Figure 1: Number of farms by country, 2013 ............................................................................................................................................................................. 3
Figure 2: Number of agricultural holdings, 2013 ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3
Figure 3: Average physical farm size at NUTS 2 level, 2013 .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Figure 4: Percentage of farms with 100 ha UAA or more, 2013 ................................................................................................................................................ 5
Figure 5: Percentage of UAA managed by farms with 100 ha or more, 2013 ........................................................................................................................... 6 Figure 6: Threshold values (top 10% UAA) and number of farms above the threshold, 2013 .................................................................................................. 7 Figure 7: Distribution of farms by economic size class, 2013 ................................................................................................................................................... 8
Figure 8: Average economic farm size in SO per holding at NUTS 2 level, 2013 .................................................................................................................... 9 Figure 9: Key farm parameters by economic size class, EU-28, 2013 ..................................................................................................................................... 10
Figure 10: Trends in farm numbers, 2003-2013 ....................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Figure 11: EU farm numbers 1975-2013 .................................................................................................................................................................................. 11 Figure 12: Change in farm numbers by economic size class, EU-27, 2005-2013 .................................................................................................................... 12
Figure 13: Legal form of EU farms and type of labour force, 2013 ......................................................................................................................................... 13 Figure 14: Legal farm status by size class, EU-28, 2013 ......................................................................................................................................................... 13
Figure 15: Land farmed under tenancy arrangements, 2013 .................................................................................................................................................... 14
Figure 16: Holdings by farm type in the EU-15, 2013 ............................................................................................................................................................. 15
Figure 17: Holdings by farm type in the EU-N13, 2013 .......................................................................................................................................................... 15 Figure 18: Land use by farm type in the EU-15, 2013 ............................................................................................................................................................. 16
Figure 19: Land use by farm type in the EU-N13, 2013 .......................................................................................................................................................... 16 Figure 20: Standard output by farm type in the EU-15, 2013 .................................................................................................................................................. 17
Figure 21: Standard output by farm type in the EU-N13, 2013 ............................................................................................................................................... 17 Figure 22: Structural diversity in the Member States, 2010 ..................................................................................................................................................... 18 Figure 23: Structural diversity at regional level, 2010 ............................................................................................................................................................. 19
Figure 24: Share of employment in agriculture, 2016 .............................................................................................................................................................. 20 Figure 25: Evolution of agricultural labour input, EU-28 ........................................................................................................................................................ 21 Figure 26: Loss of agricultural jobs by country, 2005-2017 .................................................................................................................................................... 21
Figure 27: Change in agricultural labour by economic farm size, 2005-2013 ......................................................................................................................... 22 Figure 28: Share of farms by age group of manager (EU-27, 2013) ........................................................................................................................................ 23
Figure 29: Age structure of farm managers, 2013 .................................................................................................................................................................... 24 Figure 30: Average farm size by age group of farm manager, 2013 ........................................................................................................................................ 25 Figure 31: Age of farmer by size of farmland, EU-27, 2013 ................................................................................................................................................... 25
Figure 32: Gender of farmer by age group, EU-27, 2013 ........................................................................................................................................................ 26 Figure 33: Farmers' working time by farm size class, EU-27, 2013 ........................................................................................................................................ 26
3
1. EU farms - characteristics and trends
A total of roughly 11 million farms operated
in the EU-28 in 2013.
Romania alone accounted for 33% of all
farms (partly because even the smallest
holdings are included in its agricultural
census), followed by Poland (13%) and Italy
(9%)
Figure 1: Number of farms by country, 2013
Figure 2: Number of agricultural holdings, 2013
0
500 000
1 000 000
1 500 000
2 000 000
2 500 000
3 000 000
3 500 000
4 000 000
Data source: Eurostat
4
Physical farm size
The average farm in the EU-28 had 16.1 ha of
agricultural land in 2013. Big differences remain
between the EU-15 (28.1 ha/holding) and the 13
countries that joined the EU in 2004 or later (7.8
ha/holding).
Most farms in the EU-28 can be characterised as
small in physical terms, since 66% of them had
less than 5 ha of agricultural land and only 7%
had more than 50 ha of agricultural land in 2013.
Close to half (47%) of the very small (<5ha)
farms are located in Romania, with another 11%
in Poland.
On average, farms were biggest in the Czech
Republic (133 ha/farm) and smallest in Romania
(3.6 ha/farm).
In comparison with farms in other big agricultural
producing countries, European farms remain
rather small (Brazil: 64 ha; Chile: 107 ha; USA:
170 ha; Canada: 315 ha; Argentina: around 590
ha; Australia: more than 3 000 ha per holding).
Average physical farm size in the EU grew by 4
% per year between 2005 and 2013. Annual
growth rates in the EU-N13 (+4.5% per year)
were higher than in the EU-15 (+3.5% per year).
The 66% of all farms with less than 5 ha of
agricultural land occupy only 6.2% of the total
agricultural land in the EU-28, while the 7% with
50 ha or more cover 68%. This dualism is
particularly pronounced in Bulgaria, Hungary,
Slovakia and the Czech Republic, where some
very large corporate farms co-exist with
numerous very small family farms.
Figure 3: Average physical farm size at NUTS 2 level, 2013
See also Common Context Indicator 17: Agricultural holdings (farms)
and http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rural-area-economics/briefs/pdf/09_en.pdf
Data source: Eurostat
5
The percentage of farms with 100 ha UAA or
more underlines major differences in farm
structures across Member States – while one
out of five farms in the United Kingdom,
Luxembourg, Denmark and France works on
more than 100 ha, there are no or hardly any
such farms in Malta, Slovenia and Greece.
Figure 4: Percentage of farms with 100 ha UAA or more, 2013
22.3%
21.8%
21.1%
21.0%
17.8%
12.5%
12.1%
10.5%
9.5%
8.3%
5.9%
5.5%
3.6%
3.6%
3.4%
2.7%
2.5%
2.3%
1.8%
1.7%
1.5%
0.9%
0.8%
0.4%
0.3%
0.2%
0.2%
0.0%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
United Kingdom
Luxembourg
Denmark
France
Czech Republic
Germany
Sweden
Slovakia
Estonia
Finland
Belgium
Spain
Netherlands
Latvia
Ireland
Lithuania
Bulgaria
Portugal
Austria
Hungary
Italy
Croatia
Poland
Romania
Cyprus
Greece
Slovenia
Malta
Data source: Eurostat
6
Farms with more than 100 ha UAA can cover
a very large part of the UAA, leaving only
very little land for smaller holdings. This
situation is particularly pronounced in
Slovakia, the Czech Republic and Bulgaria,
where (few) very big farms operate on close to
all agricultural land, while many very small
farms share the rest.
Figure 5: Percentage of UAA managed by farms with 100 ha or more, 2013
90%
88%
84%
75%
74%
69%
64%
62%
58%
57%
56%
55%
54%
53%
48%
47%
40%
35%
30%
27%
24%
23%
21%
20%
17%
16%
7%
0%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Slovakia
Czech Republic
Bulgaria
United Kingdom
Estonia
Denmark
Hungary
France
Portugal
Germany
Spain
Sweden
Luxembourg
Latvia
Romania
Lithuania
Croatia
Greece
Finland
Italy
Belgium
Ireland
Poland
Netherlands
Cyprus
Austria
Slovenia
Malta
Data source: Eurostat
7
If a threshold was set to separate the biggest farms which together cover 10% of UAA, this threshold would have to be above 3 000 ha in Slovakia and the
Czech Republic, above 2 500 ha in Bulgaria, the UK and Hungary and above 1 000 ha in another 6 Member States. The number of farms affected by such
a threshold is below 1% of all holdings in 21 Member States and comes to roughly 26 000 in the EU (for a total of 16.5 million ha).
Figure 6: Threshold values (top 10% UAA) and number of farms above the threshold, 2013
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
MT SI EL AT IE NL BE CY FI LU IT FR PL HR SE DK ES LT PT DE LV RO EE HU UK BG CZ SK
Number of farms > threshold Threshold value (ha)
Data source: Eurostat
8
Economic farm size
In the EU-28, the average standard output per
farm was EUR 30 536 in 2013.
The average economic size in the EU-15 (EUR
61 916) is more than seven times higher than
in the EU-N13 (EUR 8 672)1.
In line with their small average physical size,
most EU farms are small in economic terms:
69% of them have less than EUR 8 000
standard output per year and only 10.6% have
more than EUR 50 000.
Many small farms are either subsistence farms
(producing mainly for their own consumption)
or run as part-time operations (see graph 27).
Again, close to half (46%) of the very small
farms (<8 000 EUR) are located in Romania,
another 12% are in Poland.
Between 2005 and 2013, the average standard
output per farm increased by 5.7% per year in
the EU-272. This growth rate was higher in the
EU-N12 (+7.2% per year) than in the EU-15
(+5.1% per year).
This rate is higher than the growth rate for
farm size based on agricultural area, indicating
an increase in the average economic output
per unit of land (due to either a shift to
agricultural activities with higher output values
or an increase in average yields and/or prices).
1 These values are not adjusted for differences in
purchasing power. 2 2005 data for Croatia are not available.
Figure 7: Distribution of farms by economic size class, 2013
See also Common Context Indicator 17: Agricultural holdings (farms) and
http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rural-area-economics/briefs/pdf/09_en.pdf
What is the standard output? The standard output (SO) of an agricultural product (crop or livestock)
is the average monetary value of the agricultural output at farm-gate price, in euro per hectare or per
head of livestock. There is a regional SO coefficient for each product, as an average value over a
reference period (5 years). The sum of all the SO per hectare of crop and per head of livestock in a
farm is a measure of its overall economic size, expressed in euro.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
EU-28 EU-15 EU-N13
Less than 2 000 euros
From 2 000 to 3 999 euros
From 4 000 to 7 999 euros
From 8 000 to 14 999 euros
From 15 000 to 24 999 euros
From 25 000 to 49 999 euros
From 50 000 to 99 999 euros
From 100 000 to 249 999 euros
From 250 000 to 499 999 euros
500 000 euros or over
Data source: Eurostat
9
On average, farms in the north-western and
central parts of the EU are biggest in economic
terms (led by the Netherlands, Denmark and
Belgium), while smaller farms are dominant in
the more recent EU Member States (especially
in Romania).
Average farm sizes can differ within a country
(Spain and Italy are good examples), and
averages can hide the fact that there may be
many small and a few very big farms, as is the
case in some Eastern European countries.
Figure 8: Average economic farm size in SO per holding at NUTS 2 level, 2013
Data source: Eurostat
10
In terms of farm numbers, the smallest farms
in economic terms (blue bar) are clearly
dominant. They make up more than half of all
farms in the EU. Very few farms are in the
biggest economic size class (purple bar,
hardly visible).
Most of the agricultural employment comes
from farms in intermediate economic size
classes (red and green bars).
The largest share of land is managed by farms
in the upper-medium economic size class
(green bar).
These farms also hold most of the total
livestock in the EU – but note the big share
of livestock held by farms in the highest
economic size class – an indication that many
of them are big livestock producers which
generate a lot of output value without
necessarily having much land.
Finally, farms in the upper-medium economic
size class generate most of the total
production value of EU agriculture.
Figure 9: Key farm parameters by economic size class, EU-28, 2013
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
number of farms jobs (full-time units) land livestock production value
Less than 4 000 euros 4 000 - 24 999 000 euros 25 000 - 499 999 euros 500 000 euros or over
Data source: Eurostat
11
Declining farm numbers
Farm numbers are continuously decreasing.
After adjusting for changes in thresholds
between survey years, the average annual rate
of decline between 2005 and 2013 stood at 2%
for the EU-27, with greater losses in the
countries that joined the EU in 2004 and 2007
(EU-N12: -2.7% per year) than in the older
Member States (EU-15: -0.9% per year).
Figure 10: Trends in farm numbers, 2003-2013
Figure 11: EU farm numbers 1975-2013
EU-N12, -2.7
EU-15, -0.9
EU-27, -2.0
-3.0 -2.5 -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0
percent per year (average annual rate of change 2003-2013)
0
2000000
4000000
6000000
8000000
10000000
12000000
14000000
16000000
1975 1980 1983 1985 1987 1990 1993 1995 1997 2000 2003 2005 2007 2010 2013
nu
mb
er
of
ho
ldin
gs
EU-9 (BE, DK, DE, IE, FR, IT, LU, NL, UK) EU-15 (EU-9 + EL, ES, AT, PT, FI, SE)
EU-N12 (BG, CZ, EE, CY, LV, LT, HU, MT, PL, RO, SI, SK) EU-27
Data source: Eurostat
12
The vast majority of farms that go out of business (or move to a higher size
class) belong to the smallest economic size class. Only from a size class of
100 000 EUR onwards does the overall number of holdings increase.
The observed reduction in farm numbers is thus first and foremost an
indication of farm size growth, in which very small holdings become part
of larger farms.
Figure 12: Change in farm numbers by economic size class, EU-27, 2005-2013
-2 500 000
-2 000 000
-1 500 000
-1 000 000
-500 000
0
500 000
Zero euros Less than2000 euros
2000 to3999 euros
4000 to7999 euros
8000 to14999euros
15000 to24999euros
25000 to49999euros
50000 to99999euros
100000 to249999euros
250000 to499999euros
500000euros or
over
Data source: Eurostat
13
Organisational structure
In 2013, 97% of all holdings in the EU were
held by a single natural person. In most
cases, this person was also the farm manager,
and the corresponding holdings can be
considered family farms, as opposed to
corporate farms (where the holder is a legal
entity; 2.8% of all farms) or group holdings
(owned by a group of natural persons; 0.7% of
all farms).
These family farms managed 67% of the
agricultural land in the EU-28, while 27.5% of
the area was managed by corporate farms, an
indication of their bigger average size.
Corporate farms and group holdings are most
prevalent in the higher economic size classes.
Corporate farms are most common in France,
which also has the highest number of group
holdings. Together, these two categories
account for one-third (33.2%) of all holdings
in France.
The legal structure of farms is reflected in the
agricultural labour force, where 83% of all
agricultural labour input in the EU-28 is
provided by members of the sole holder's
family.
Figure 13: Legal form of EU farms and type of labour force, 2013
Figure 14: Legal farm status by size class, EU-28, 2013
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Sole holderholding
Holding is legalentity
Group holdings family labourforce
non-familylabour force
EU-28
EU-15
EU-N13
99.5% 98.5%
85.5%
55.5%
0.5% 1.3% 11.3%
35.3%
0.0% 0.2% 3.2% 9.2%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Less than 4 000 euros 4 000 - 24 999 000euros
25 000 - 499 999 euros 500 000 euros or over
sole holder legal entity group holdingsData source: Eurostat
14
Land ownership
More than 43% of the land in the EU-28 is farmed under a tenancy
arrangement.
In Slovakia, Malta and France, this even comes close to 80%, while in
Ireland and Poland only 16% of the land is farmed by tenants.
In Greece, 32% of the agricultural area is managed under share farming or
other modes, most likely as common land.
Figure 15: Land farmed under tenancy arrangements, 2013
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%Ir
ela
nd
Po
lan
d
Po
rtu
gal
Gre
ece
Net
her
lan
ds
Ro
man
ia
Slo
ven
ia
Un
ite
d K
ingd
om
De
nm
ark
Spai
n
Fin
lan
d
Au
stri
a
Ital
y
Latv
ia
Cro
atia
Swed
en
Lith
uan
ia
Hu
nga
ry
Esto
nia
Cyp
rus
Luxe
mb
ou
rg
Ger
man
y
Be
lgiu
m
Bu
lgar
ia
Cze
ch R
epu
blic
Fran
ce
Mal
ta
Slo
vaki
a
EU-28
Data source: Eurostat
15
Farm types and specialisation
Farms can be classified into different types,
according to the share of the farm's main
activity in total farm standard output3.
Number of holdings by farm type
While in the EU-15 34% of all holdings are
specialised in permanent crops (mostly due to
the situation in Mediterranean countries),
granivores (pigs and poultry) and mixed
production systems play a more prominent role
in the EU-N13.
Farm size varies with farm specialisation.
Holdings with no agricultural land are
predominantly producing granivores (or
grazing livestock held in intensive indoor
systems or on common land). Farms with
bigger areas of agricultural land tend to
specialise in field cropping and grazing
livestock
The smallest farms show the greatest diversity
in their farming activities and often practise
mixed crop-livestock farming.
3 For details, see Commission Implementing Regulation
(EU) 2015/220.
Figure 16: Holdings by farm type in the EU-15, 2013
Figure 17: Holdings by farm type in the EU-N13, 2013
field cropping, 25%
horticulture, 3%
permanent crops, 34%
grazing livestock, 23%
granivores, 2%
mixed and non-classified, 13%
field cropping, 33%
horticulture, 1%
permanent crops, 6%
grazing livestock, 13%
granivores, 14%
mixed and non-classified, 33%
Data source: Eurostat
16
Land use by farm type
The largest share of agricultural land is taken
up by field cropping and grazing livestock
(significantly more field cropping and less
grazing livestock in the EU-N13 than in the
EU-15).
Around one-quarter of the agricultural land in
the EU-N13 belongs to farms which practise a
mix of activities or are not classified.
Farms specialised in horticulture, permanent
crops or granivores take up very little
agricultural land.
Figure 18: Land use by farm type in the EU-15, 2013
Figure 19: Land use by farm type in the EU-N13, 2013
field cropping, 38%
horticulture, 1%
permanent crops, 8%
grazing livestock, 37%
granivores, 3%
mixed and non-classified, 14%
field cropping, 54%
horticulture, 1% permanent crops, 2%
grazing livestock, 17%
granivores, 2%
mixed and non-classified, 25%
Data source: Eurostat
17
Standard output by farm type
In terms of standard output, farms specialised
in grazing livestock contribute the largest share
in the EU-15, while field cropping and mixed
farming dominate in the EU-N13.
Horticulture, despite its low share in the
number of holdings and in agricultural land
use, contributes 10% to total standard output in
the EU-15, a result of the high value of
horticultural products.
Figure 20: Standard output by farm type in the EU-15, 2013
Figure 21: Standard output by farm type in the EU-N13, 2013
field cropping, 18%
horticulture, 10%
permanent crops, 14%
grazing livestock, 28%
granivores, 18%
mixed and non-classified, 12%
field cropping, 31%
horticulture, 5%
permanent crops, 4%
grazing livestock, 20%
granivores, 14%
mixed and non-classified, 27%
Data source: Eurostat
18
Structural diversity of farming Structural diversity is here described as the
distribution of agricultural holdings across
different farm types in a given area, measured
by Simpson's Index of Diversity4. When all
holdings in a given region specialise in the
same farming activity, there is no diversity and
the index value is "0". On the other hand, a
perfect distribution of holdings across all farm
types is shown by the index value of 1.
The analysis of the index at Member State
level gives a snapshot of the structural
diversity of agricultural activities in the EU in
2010 (the year of the last agricultural census).
Croatia, Romania and Bulgaria show the
greatest degree of structural diversity with
index values above 0.8. In those countries,
farms are well distributed across several farm
types.
Relative high values of Simpson's Index can be
also observed in a group of 8 countries
(France, Germany, Belgium, the Czech
Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Poland and
Slovenia), where agriculture represents a rich
variety of activities: in France for example,
35% of the holdings produce grazing livestock,
26% field cropping, 18% permanent crops and
8.4% mixed crops/livestock; the other farm
types (horticulture, granivores, mixed cropping
and mixed livestock) are also represented and
together account for 12% of all holdings.
4 Simpson's Index of Diversity determines the degree of
concentration when individuals are classified into types.
A less diverse structure of agriculture holdings exists in Italy, Spain and Greece, where permanent
crops form the dominant farm type with a share of around 50% or more in all holdings.
Ireland has the lowest degree of farm type diversity, with 87% of all holdings specialised in grazing
livestock. In the United Kingdom and Luxembourg, more than 60% of all holdings specialise in
grazing livestock, while in Cyprus and Finland the same rate of concentration applies to permanent
crops and field cropping, respectively.
Figure 22: Structural diversity in the Member States, 2010
19
The degree of structural diversity and thus the
different combination of farm types across the
EU is however clearly influenced by external
factors such as topography, climate or other
specific conditions of the territory and this is
even more evident at a lower geographic level.
At regional level, the index values present in
fact a bigger variation than the national ones
and this reflects the specific and local diversity
in term of climate, topographical and social
conditions. The distribution of holdings across
farm types within the same country can change
significantly: in some Mediterranean countries
such as Italy and Spain, the most southern and
coastal regions are characterized by a more
specialised structure of agriculture where very
few farm types dominate the production: in
Sicily, Calabria and Puglia and in Andalucia,
Comunidad Valenciana and Región de Murcia
holdings specialised in permanent crops
dominate the production with a share of at
least 60%.
Figure 23: Structural diversity at regional level, 2010
20
2. The agricultural labour force
How many people work in EU agriculture?
Labour input in agriculture is notoriously
difficult to survey, and different sources provide
different figures depending on the definitions,
samples and methods used.
Estimates for the number of persons involved in
agricultural activities reach 22.2 million for
2013, many of whom are working part-time.
Converted into full-time equivalents, this comes
to somewhere between 8.7 and 9.5 million.
The share of agriculture in overall employment
is in the area of 4%.
For more information on different ways of
measuring agricultural labour input, see EU
Agricultural Economics Brief no. 8: How many
people work in agriculture in the European
Union?
Figure 24: Share of employment in agriculture, 2016
See also Common Context Indicator 13: Employment by economic activity
Data source: Eurostat
21
Evolution of agricultural labour input
Over the last decade, the long-term downward
trend in agricultural labour input continued.
Since 2005, more than one out of four
agricultural jobs disappeared (-25.5%).
The period 2005-2010 showed stronger losses (-
4.1% per year on average) than the period 2011-
2017 (-0.9% per year). Since 2015 the numbers
have changed very little.
The greatest reduction can be seen for family
labour (-31.5% between 2005 and 2017), while
hired labour has hardly changed (-1.3%). In
recent years (2011-2017), hired labour has even
increased by 1% per year on average.
Romania reported by far the biggest losses in
agricultural jobs, possibly reflecting a process of
structural adjustment after accession to the EU.
Figure 25: Evolution of agricultural labour input, EU-28
Figure 26: Loss of agricultural jobs by country, 2005-2017
0
2 000
4 000
6 000
8 000
10 000
12 000
14 000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
1 0
00
an
nu
al w
ork
un
its
Non-salaried Salaried
-983
-616
-387
-187 -162 -131 -109 -105 -103 -96 -63 -56 -54 -35 -30 -28 -26 -18 -18 -17 -14 -12 -11 -9 -8 -1
1 15
-1 200
-1 000
-800
-600
-400
-200
0
200
1 0
00
an
nu
al w
ork
un
its
Data source: Eurostat
22
In 2013, roughly 22 million people were
involved in agricultural production. These are
people who were regularly engaged in farm
work, but not necessarily on a full-time basis.
Converted into full-time equivalents, this
represents about 9 million5, i.e. less than one
fulltime job per farm.
Over the years, the agricultural labour force
has declined. Between 2005 and 2015, more
than 3 million full-time jobs were lost – a
minus of 25%.
Most jobs were lost in farms belonging to the
smallest size classes. This is roughly in line
with the reduction in farm numbers, which also
concerned mostly the smallest farms.
See also Common Context Indicator 22:
Farm labour force
5 Depending on the data source, figures vary between
8.7 million and 9.6 million AWU.
Figure 27: Change in agricultural labour by economic farm size, 2005-2013
-1 200 000
-1 000 000
-800 000
-600 000
-400 000
-200 000
0
200 000
Zeroeuros
Less than2 000euros
2 000 - 3999
euros
4 000 - 7999
euros
8 000 -14 999euros
15 000 -24 999euros
25 000 -49 999euros
50 000 -99 999euros
100 000 -249 999
euros
250 000 -499 999
euros
500 000euros or
over
AWU
Data source: Eurostat
23
Age of farmers6
The majority of farmers in the EU (56%) is
older than 55 years, while only 6% are
younger than 35 years. This means that for
every farmer younger than 35 years, there were
9 farmers older than 55 years in the EU-277 in
2013.
Portugal has the highest proportion of elderly
(above 55 years) farm managers (73.7%),
while Austria has the lowest (28.2%).
The share of young farmers (below 35 years) is
highest in Poland (12.1%), followed by Austria
(10.9%). It is lowest in Cyprus (1.7%),
Portugal and Denmark (both 2.5%).
See also Common Context Indicator 23: Age
structure of farm managers
6 Figures refer to farm managers (the natural person
responsible for the normal daily financial and
production routines of running the holding concerned),
not to the total labour force. 7 Data for Croatia are not available.
Figure 28: Share of farms by age group of manager (EU-27, 2013)
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Less than 35 years From 35 to 44years
From 45 to 54years
From 55 to 64years
65 years or overfa
rms
Age of farm manager
EU-27 EU-15 EU-N12
Data source: Eurostat
24
Figure 29: Age structure of farm managers, 2013
25
Age and farm size – an inverse correlation?
While average farm size is lowest for elderly
farmers, young farmers especially in the EU-15
tend to manage the largest holdings.
Similarly, the proportion of older farmers is
highest in the smallest farm size class and
decreases for higher size classes.
There seems thus to be an inverse relationship
between farm size and the age of the farm
manager.
These figures suggest that the decline in farm
numbers needs to be put into the demographic
context, where many small farms are managed by
older farmers, often beyond the normal retirement
age. When these farmers stop farming, their farms
are not likely to be maintained as such but will be
merged into other farms. As a result, the overall
number of farms declines and average farm size
increases.
Figure 30: Average farm size by age group of farm manager, 2013
Figure 31: Age of farmer by size of farmland, EU-27, 2013
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Total Less than 35years
From 35 to 44years
From 45 to 54years
From 55 to 64years
65 years orover
he
ctar
es
pe
r h
old
ing
EU-27 EU-15 EU-N12
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
zero ha less than 2ha
2 - 4.9 ha 5 - 9.9 ha 10 - 19.9ha
20 - 29.9ha
30 - 49.9ha
50 - 99.9ha
100 ha orover
Less than 35 years From 35 to 44 years From 45 to 54 years From 55 to 64 years 65 years or overData source: Eurostat
26
Gender of farmers
Women manage less than one-third (28%) of all
holdings in the EU-278. They only farm 13% of
the agricultural area, which means that on average
their farms are less than half as big (7.6 ha/farm)
as that of a male farmer (19.5 ha/farm).
Two out of five female farmers are older than 65
years (40%). For male farmers, this ratio comes to
28%. The proportion of female farmers is thus
greater in the higher age groups (possibly due to
the higher life expectancy of women in general).
Working patterns
Managers of small farms tend to put in less
working time than those of bigger farms. One out
of five farmers with less than 5 ha of agricultural
land spends less than a quarter of his or her
working time on the farm; This percentage
declines with increasing farm size: 82% of
farmers with 100 ha or more work full time.
8 Data for Croatia are not available.
Figure 32: Gender of farmer by age group, EU-27, 2013
Figure 33: Farmers' working time by farm size class, EU-27, 2013
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
total <35 years 35-44 years 45-54 years 55-64 years 65 years andover
Male farmer Female farmer
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
less than 5 ha From 5 to 9.9ha
From 10 to19.9 ha
From 20 to29.9 ha
From 30 to49.9 ha
From 50 to99.9 ha
100 ha orover
From 1 to 24 percent of a full-time From 25 to 49 percent of a full-time
From 50 to 74 percent of a full-time From 75 to 99 percent of a full-time
100 percent of a full-timeData source: Eurostat