fateful visions: avoiding nuclear catastropheby joseph s. nye; graham t. allison; albert carnesale
TRANSCRIPT
Fateful Visions: Avoiding Nuclear Catastrophe by Joseph S. Nye; Graham T. Allison; AlbertCarnesaleReview by: Gregory F. TrevertonForeign Affairs, Vol. 67, No. 1 (Fall, 1988), p. 180Published by: Council on Foreign RelationsStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20043686 .
Accessed: 14/06/2014 17:10
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
.
Council on Foreign Relations is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to ForeignAffairs.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 91.229.229.101 on Sat, 14 Jun 2014 17:10:54 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
180 FOREIGN AFFAIRS
have made a specialized study of the institutions through which such advice is conceived, sifted and transmitted. Individual case studies tell how the
system has worked in Britain, France, West Germany, the United States, Canada and Australia; more general chapters deal across the board with
"systems of advice," particularly in the key fields of economics and foreign policy. The authors name names, but the book would pique the reader's interest more if the descriptions of planning boards, advisory staffs, minis tries and eminences grises were enlivened by examples of vital decisions
brilliantly made or badly bungled.
ESSAYS ON A HALF-CENTURY: IDEAS, POLICIES, AND ACTION. By W. W. Rostow. Boulder (Colo.): Westview Press, 1988, 190 pp. $29.95.
Essays, articles and speeches over some forty years, introduced by an
autobiographical report done for the 50th reunion of the class of 1936 at Yale. In general the pieces follow themes for which the author is known from his major works and his public career, but some take the reader, with
benefit, off that beaten track. The book should be welcomed by fans of Walt Rostow and all who appreciate a sharp and fertile mind.
General: Military, Technological and Scientific
Gregory F. Treverton
FATEFUL VISIONS: AVOIDING NUCLEAR CATASTROPHE. Edited by Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Graham T. Allison, Jr., and Albert Carnesale.
Cambridge: Ballinger, 1988, 284 pp. $19.95. This latest product of Harvard's Avoiding Nuclear War Project takes
off from the premise that deterrence is not likely to fail soon but will not
last forever. The contributing authors thus examine long-term paths to a more stable world, ranging from the technology of strategic defense or more discriminating weapons to the politics of Soviet decline and improved U.S.-Soviet relations. The analysis is careful, the conclusions thoughtfully modest. Not surprisingly, no path is a panacea: the world could be safer, for example, if the Soviet Union declined gracefully like the British Empire, but could be more dangerous if the decline were akin to that of the Austro
Hungarian Empire. The book's editors put their faith, in the short run, in
policies and force postures to "lengthen the fuse" to nuclear weapons and, for the long term, in an evolution of U.S.-Soviet relations.
U.S.-SOVIET SECURITY COOPERATION. Edited by Alexander L.
George, Philip J. Farley and Alexander Dallin. New York: Oxford, 1988, 746 pp. $42.00 (paper, $18.95).
These Stanford authors share their Harvard colleagues' premise that if
the threat of nuclear Armageddon has been mostly responsible for pre
venting war between the superpowers, the U.S. and the Soviet Union ought to be able to turn their shared security interest into cooperation, tacit or
explicit. This impressive volume mines the postwar history of such efforts in Europe, in arms control and in dealing with regional conflict. While the
relationship is and will remain fundamentally conflicted?only in Europe have the two superpowers developed a set of assumptions and agreements that amount to a security regime?still, they share incentives to cooperate: each senses it is vulnerable to modern war and that unilateral measures to
This content downloaded from 91.229.229.101 on Sat, 14 Jun 2014 17:10:54 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions