fathers, work and families in twenty- first century ... · 4/23/2013 · the findings in this...
TRANSCRIPT
Fathers, work and families in twenty-first century Britain: beyond
the breadwinner model?
The findings in this presentation are preliminary – please do not
reference without authors’ permission
Margaret O’Brien & Svetlana Speight Matt Aldrich, Sara Connolly, Eloise Poole
23 April 2013, UCL
Outline
• Policy & research context
• Aims of project and data sources
• Profiling of UK fathers’ working patterns Time trends in employment status and hours 2001-2011; continuity and change across different family types
• Profiling UK Fathers: fatherhood status and definitions. Dealing with Complexity: bio, social, non-resident
Policy & Research Context
“ In a rapidly changing world, we will continue witnessing the growing momentum and recognition of the importance of men for gender equality, reconciling work-family life and impacting the future of their children”
Men in Families and Family Policy in a Changing World Report 2011 New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/ family/docs/men-in-families.pdf
Research: 1970s, 1980s, 1990s
Fathers: partners, carers, involved, nurturers
Anxieties about absent fathers
Inter-disciplinary conceptual framework for understanding change and continuity in
men’s family and work roles • Awareness that the family unit is undergoing a transition from
a traditional unitary model based on a male dominant economic actor towards a different logic with less specialization of roles by gender (Becker, 1981; Browning et al, 2011).
• New norms redefining family life are emerging – “a gender-equality equilibrium” – but are unstable (Esping-Anderson, 2009).
• A multidimensional approach to men’s parenting activities or “father involvement” with direct and indirect influences of paternal capital on child and family wellbeing (Pleck, 2010)
• Awareness that public policy measures, such as parental leave and flexible working schedules, have a profound effect on how much time children get to spend with their parents (Gornick & Meyers, 2009; Lewis, 2009).
Aims of the study
1. To provide a comprehensive profiling of fathers in 21st century Britain in terms of their paid work and family life.
2. To explore factors associated with differences in fathers’ paid work and family life.
3. To analyse time trends in fathers’ working patterns to explore effects of policy changes.
4. To explore the role of institutional factors, by comparing the UK with other European countries.
Data
1. Understanding society, wave 1 (2009-10) and wave 2 (2010-11).
2. EU Labour Force Survey (late 1990s-current)
3. European Social Survey, round 2 (2004-05) and round 5 (2010-11)
4. British Household Panel Survey, all 18 waves (1991-2009)
Fathers’ working patterns
EU- LFS 2001-2011
• Adult couple households with dependent children (2011 20,569 couple households of which 6,092 have at least one child under the age of 15 living in the household)
• Age restriction on the household reference person – 16-64 years
• Employment status FT = 30 hours or more per week PT = <30 hours per week
• Definitions of working hours "usual" weekly hours
Working patterns of couple households with
dependent children 2001-2011 (HRP 16-64)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Other
Neither
working
Male sole PT
earner
Female sole PT
earner
Dual PT
Female sole FT
earner
Male sole FT
earner
FFT and MPT
MFT and FPT
MFT and FFT
Oth
er0
.5 w
ork
er1
FTE
wo
rker
1.5
FTE
wo
rker
s
2 F
TE
wo
rker
s
% of households
2011 2001
43
44
45
46
47
48
2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011
Ave
rage
usu
al h
ou
rs in
mai
n jo
b
Working hours of men in households with children (age 16-64)
MFT and FFT MFT and FPT Male sole FT earner All FT All
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011
Ave
rage
usu
al h
ou
rs in
mai
n jo
b
Working hours of men in households with children PT (age 16-64)
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011
Ave
rage
usu
al h
ou
rs in
mai
n jo
b
Working hours of men in households with children by family type PT (age 16-64)
FFT and MPT Dual PT Male sole PT earner All PT
38
39
40
41
42
2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011
Ave
rage
usu
al h
ou
rs in
mai
n jo
b
Working hours of women in households with children FT (age 16-64)
38
39
40
41
42
2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011
Ave
rage
usu
al h
ou
rs in
mai
n jo
b
Working hours of women in households with children FT by family type (age 16-64)
MFT and FFT FFT and MPT Female sole FT earner All FT
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011
% w
ork
ing
60
or
mo
re h
ou
rs p
er
we
ek
Incidence of long working hours 60+ of parents (age 16-64)
Father dual earner hh Father 1.5 earner hh Male sole earner hh All full-time fathers
Mother dual earner hh Mother 1.5 earner hh Female sole earner hh All full-time mothers
Fatherhood: concepts
Fatherhood
• Fathers v ‘non-fathers’
– Typology
• Biological v social father
• Resident v non-resident father
Fatherhood status
1. Fathers co-resident with dependent children: in couples
2. Fathers co-resident with dependent children: single parents
3. Fathers not living with any dependent children
4. Non-fathers
Fatherhood status, 2009/10
0 10 20 30 40
Non-father
Father, no dependent children
Father, dependent children, lone
Father, dependent children,
couple
Base: men aged 16+ (n=20,741, Understanding Society survey)
25
1
38
36
Age profile
41
1
0
2
27
3
11
22
12
6
42
43
12
32
40
31
8
58
7
2
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Non-father
Father, no dependent
children
Father, dependent
children, lone
Father, dependent
children, couple
16-24 25-34 35-44 45-59 60+
Non-fathers, by age
0 20 40 60 80 100
60+
45 to 59
35 to 44
25 to 34
16 to 24
Economic status
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Economically inactive
Unemployed
Working part-time
Working full-time
Economically inactive
Unemployed
Working part-time
Working full-time
Economically inactive
Unemployed
Working part-time
Working full-time
Economically inactive
Unemployed
Working part-time
Working full-time
No
n-f
ath
er
Fath
er, n
o
dep
end
ent
child
ren
Fath
er,
dep
end
ent
child
ren
, lo
ne
Fath
er,
dep
end
ent
child
ren
,
cou
ple
% within each category of fatherhood
(men aged 16-64)
Biological v social father
Fathers co-resident with dependent children
0 20 40 60 80 100
Step
Foster
Adopted
Biological 94
1
0.4
11
Base: fathers co-resident with dependent children (n=5,556)
Bio v non-bio
96
87
2
7
2
6
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Lone fathers
Couple fathers
Bio only Bio and non-bio Non-bio only
Resident v non-resident father
Whether has a non-resident child <16
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Non-father
Father, no dependent children
Father, dependent children, lone
Father, dependent children,
couple
All men 16+
Base: all men aged 16+ (n=20,663)
Non-resident fathers
More likely to be:
• <45 years old (compared with 45+)
• Living without a partner (OR: 28!)
• Less well educated
• Not in paid work
• NS-SEC group - routine occupations
• In rented accommodation
Whether non-resident fathers are co-resident with any dependent children
Base: fathers who have non-resident children under 16 (n=1,053)
27%
2%
24%
46%
Has resident
children and is
in a couple
Has resident
children - lone
father
No resident
children and is
single
No resident
children and is
in a couple
Contact with non-resident children
10 11
5
11
2225
14
2
21
4
1719
17
8
3
10
No
contact
Few times
a year
A few
times a
year
Several
times a
month
Once a
week
Several
times a
week
Almost
every day
50/50
Non-resident child/ren only Resident and non-resident children
Base: fathers who have non-resident children under 16 (n=1,050)
Thank you
Prof. Margaret O’Brien (UEA) – [email protected]
Dr Svetlana Speight (NatCen Social Research) – [email protected]
Dr Sara Connolly (UEA) – [email protected]
Dr Matt Aldrich (UEA) – [email protected]
Eloise Poole (NatCen) – [email protected]