FAX N o .

R~vWansly ComjWu~ CFdi LUlqB(Lan -@dl, R~ ip ( i BTCPfi ; i ~ b ~ & @ 'a AT&W- ;aec;kb< @45i

&n&ftu&cl3 d e k ! (4% . U x S IOf~jm) smadw ) n : g = ~ , 1 Q b v i m m = z > - ~ & M 3) ,

~!!?3mw!?n

F A X N o .

FAX N o ,

4 J3gO W h a d Street. 2 [ Building 104

,, &mm, CaEfmPa %58Q 3 I T E I E ~ ~ Q ~ E : ( ~ ~ 1 1 i (0~-~+20

F ' ~ & i q (99i) SS-423D 4 E ~ a i : : r a i s & ~ p u ~ h ~ I e ~ i

~ E T ~ E DRW %%okf? 23, a20 Trial Date: 1

i

I' 24 !! 2 Dcf&t Ti'-EX 'hick P ~ o ~ u c ~ , Jac- is. a capxatjon wik n prhcipd 21ace 1 1

FA!! 140,

3 unknawn t6 plaintiff who ik.refure ma them by such fictitious names. ?hintiff u.i_lf seek ii

;r

I' 4 1 leave to amend mis Complaint to show the he% names and capacities of DOBS 1 thmugh 10

. I

i 2

5 I1 upon discovery of the s m . ~lsisiff t i ~ e g e the& it times mention4 herein, z~ of me rl

6 /I dtfeadana zc td ocpzrticBqa*d in some mznmz in tile a% nlkged . c i u . s;d ia same wiiy 7 1 zm, ZE r~fpti~r3bIc fc; pl8intiWs ~ i f i g ~ . All refeiecces ro 53,s named defmdmi

i: ,\'I * n 11 ~(0d.l h~iride, without iiaita6rsrs. Does 1 through 1 G inc;asive.

4. T h e me nmae and capc3.ias. whatber h & v i d d , coqm~te, piummhip,

wwate or o&&=, of ddmhb Does 1 Wwgh 10 inclmive, and each of them, are

9 1 5. $kintiff d3egtx that, s.e r;31 erne* meniimed herein e ~ d x~J.csa orhenvise lS

il;! If in&;zt=& =E& ~f E::: &C&&:w w a & ratq i$ f& W ~ P , ~f e3& s,f o ~ k r &fm3&a5, ri -Ow ?I md ihzn~ach of t5e 6&nCrrm, in p;fcm.hg the 8- aeze$. nzs 8;- nit53 the t c m

1 12 t! iz;id ~cope af sach agency. I f

13 $ Vi:&TR. AND 3 T ~ H ~ F J Y ~ ~ N

. i' 2. !j 3. Lr?xaui =irr~m&u~&, k c . ("Asmij'"') :YES k.y;poxt& Scptmh1 14.2% LQCI C

22 is LQ the b ~ s h e s s cf ?c&c?cirtg. s d l i n ~ , pild &sUi-I2[iilg B C ~ O ~ & V = r ~ z e s s d e ~ . p+~iG~ali;t, ! !

23 d h - g h tk dii?'par ' m & g of . h n l a d it^ -pr.a*era, Asz'Ps.~~ tss 5 e f ~ m z a pre~ ie r 11

24 $ provider of wheels -and Ecr upwde vehicjeg. k!

F A X N o .

'1 11 i i

3 'I ! D. .4~a-iti e i c d s i g n s were w a k s f t r hire md design WE cSkec~b m d p ~ d it

j j 8 ~ y z n d t". 3::s~ 2907 mzncfz~33fifig zd ado. ~g~-t%q a.I.ic!~ i.~chded a r.om~1-tc L

17. AdclirI.ondly, prim ro October 12,2010, Asanti cntmd inta an o d sigreemwrc

f a rcapl~lfactu~&cg md 15s~b,uden with Dekndanre for Asmri branded gtilkes. In I

prdommce sf tf=c agreement Mendmts had a s m s ID pprietzq i~~fomation, incl3d'p.g I

4 ~ a d e seer% sfid vendor Zsts @ Asanti. De fenhb purposefully sol3 or attempted to sell I

5 Asmei bmdeb products h breach of thc: agwmznt by under q a d r r g mks an roydty

6 stawmnfs. Defendants, in breech Q-F the RSEtqti ageme~k h m scccss to pmprietq ;mcP I

I i:

I ? cmdidentiai 4nfom~i~ln oFksanti md m&~it to use th5 Asmti pmpritw aqd maff&n~d I R !i ImPIT:am"unn a&\~it Asan$;; pemhsjm. Fn;"(i-m, Eefezbts ait=pt to "8:: Asm2

ri I ;\ 1; y Ii nropr';etzry Srfofmation fgt v.nf~Jr bx~imss pra~F;xs. I"

10 4 FIXST CACiSBu'; GF .&gl'FXQN tl

1 [ Q @ a d ~ U E % ~ C*xpiaH&n -A&Y;.& &fedm%e; armd Tkes 1. Wan& 10) A - 11

iZ I/ IS- ZdaE Asmti r e d e g ~ ~ ffic~rpmzttea by d z x e ~ c s efi& bsl5egaciorr f j

13 cmt&ncd in pingaph~ 1 tk~q$k Z 8 above. /!

14 { j 13, On or E ~ D U I J'dy ZW? B&epiBants enttce iiih & ~ . p m r ~ t with baaif. far 1

15 m~fi&a&~rikg gilitii~zs. in @bm?nca cf ths spci;ilmt Asroti ebera0 midmiiai cEmt ;r

i 6 k h f r n z ~ o o iiicludirip. ccsro=lor Bets, co~taet informarim =d crbtr p@e&ry i u f m 5 o I:

! 7 !i w+t5, EPzfmdantc. !! !i

l g it X. fis%5 Gcges, on Wo=tj~^n_ & bc&c, Defendmrts r~,oiqg ;53~35.~ r l ' !

19 ii cw%dz3tid d e ~ t izlmnstion d t k e g ? pmizsim md iy: b m h of the $aa;~ & y eei~efit.

29 1 21, -decdmb'wuc .' * t - I * ( - Y I ~ U ~ ~ ~ T B E ~ l & m & Xiil~f&r C Q ~ C " ~ ~ W I :xi md has ~ ~ t d I 21 i j wnriaw PO dmzgc &a&

I? *+ !! L.L !! 32. B K ~ C S ~ 02 tbp, b ? & k a ~ e : ~ l id ic Ic?~~ , a id o ~ ~ ~ s s % Y ~ me of iSef3&gEs1

I! -.+ fi

COP.~UC~, A%~,rr!i S~P& Wi $W&I punitipla & E Q ~ ~ E a$i&jt C%itf~pAa~m T;! m E n i i;

24 il m-%eienr to ptmdsh seb deem E3ci.m snd ~&2r;3 e c m g f d z a c w . a&!=, to &-re ~ a m x 04 t ! 55 // &c r&tk~$hip, sceess m prc?rie%ry i~&;inaW, and past c n d ~ d it A ~ n d an I? 25 i~jv..zztji.;: qfiinsr &e D&sdano Ercz ez;&ng iotc t k .%ma zar'kx Zix 7 p&& of no ices

!I 27 " t'& jj "'ER m'a f"c&E%. I! e 3ECQm CAaSE. AS,T-fJp? t;i L! 1;

FA)! N o

)\ i 6 I! information incfu&ng. cnsifimerr b t s , co.st3.ct infomatiom arzd other pmpx5e1;ky ' M G ~ ~ w . , II 1

7 11 with Defendani-g- i j

i g !! . Asanti alleges, m infmm&3~~ a d %U&* rbet Qefmckr~ts ma using Asmi" s I t

\ i

1 I I l j 11 , Ekf=92&ina ccitbnct Galates Common Law Xj"ntf& Ckqx!%m m@ ~ K S zqd i

1, i

11 1 coztir.uas io damage Asa~tl. 11

i 12 11 2 E&~awe of the deEbeme, izdiciozs, ~ 2 d eppre3sive n a m of C E ~ C Z G ~ S *

I I I I :3 11 msGsi, Asmti s ~ ~ 2 c s a.n ~wzard. of pmi5ve dsmagcs ngsimt hfmdmts h an mount r " 4 I 1~ ;1 s u f f l d ~ t i U p&h 3c.W &em md oh~rs Wrn d d ~ ac.3~. Fii5tr, Znt 3 Qe n9twsi of

L ? A I!

I !

1 23 11 &a ,te!aEonssrip, accsss a pmpikx$ry in,Forn-e60n, and past conduct it &an& se~'ks rn - 16 11 iq:acdc~ E;?E 5eBefmdana h m entering ir.b the Ps!i mr& %r a p&od of no jess

;I I I 17 (1 than W G yeiiis.

It t i IS P Yma CAWE QF ACrnOY 1

i I ' @.?.?~ppmp~a6~ d Tnde k r e i Agakit I)eFeadasts ssnd aces 1 through iO] I 20 1 28- In,&!iff Aszd ~aiieges and ia~rp,mies by r,fr;mz- each d.Ics5on 1 I 1 i 11 [ ccmtahlf26 prkgrapks 1 h j u & ? 228 ebve, I

I! 1

2 Jj 29. On cr a * m l M y 2Om D e f ~ n ~ 8 =tend into nod spsment with As&-ad for 1 I' i

1 '1 madmturirig pies. in p'ormance d &= agmr~mt b2mti, s b ~ l : d conrichtiai c k t 21 !i i n f o a r i m hdldq. casromcs lists, cmgc: !;.Lo.m~$sz o d z ~ pr~prietay Lectnm&n~ ?r

i I

25 I f tvih D&cn.'zzts, I !P I

25 ' f 1 I I! 3% A~lmti Minfarmati~~ * ~ t E=f=~d=ir: = u r i q A~a&'s i ? 27 11 ~~rifi??*,g c%eri L x f m & m without permission and in ljeach d &c himti n p = m l . 1

Ir

FAX N o .

3 1. Defendants' conduct constitutes a CaliforniaUnfair Competition law and has

and continues to damage Asanti,

32. Because of the deliberate, mdicious, md oppressive nature of l3efendants'

conduct, Asanti seeks an award of punitive damages against Defandants in an amount

5 1 wff ic i~t ta ~ i s b md daar than md o h m horn similar sea. Pwk, j;l; to ,rhc namre of I

h f !he rc?atims'nip, acm.5 to ppri&y infomation. and pru! cxmk~c: it Asanti seeks an !I

7 $ injexactioa ageinet, Qtit CefeMaeS from entering kttw t k PP=~ ~ x k e t for aperiod @s?o less I;

I i

I+ i i4 i I mmuf~1dng ella. h ~ r f ~ ~ ~ i of &C 8pei fx~!t A5mti ~~Itqchntiilf client I II I

! I 1

17 if 35. h a n d &!,~ZEI rn 22rn~eaa md beiief. that izefeadmb rrr: eg%g Acmii.'& i I I I 15 eov--&npA oEcnt $fzms'Jm +ilmr permhion and in he='.- of %:: AsmG ~gremen l t

19 if 3.5. ,~EUIS aireg~ am ~z?Fc!-~~cE ant3 %CE~$ %at, ~8fmdiirib 90id or O E ~ ~ I for Ii

I 20 1] side h a m i branded p m d m &x +L- A s a . ~ ageerrat wss ea.n&~ted.

Ir j !

21 ;I 37. Dzfm&m%' coa$zd is h b@&ch of the #,smS ~ ~ ~ m z z l : h: mi ! ! I! t~ P continuer tc d-ge ~ s 8 1 i 3 .

I! I

a 1; -18. Btxafise of ttie deiibemn; ndicio.rs, d cpgasive n e b or' iG~f~n&qra' 1 1 1 14 ' c l ~ d c c ; .+&Wi seek3 an award of p ~ . i ~ v e d2,n'Lags qg&7& Defmdm(8 h cn -ens: 1 Ir - -. . I 35 ji sn%ciml io punish and dew thtm 23d Q L ~ ~ S f ; ; ~ sidli iar acis in P L L L U ~ O ~ 5 ~e e~tl:& i I f i 26 i/ dznagu ssaofiated ~ i m hxhch ~ s d 9egal c m d ~ c ~ F u h ~ r , due to 3 e n%iw= d if;= ji j

I 27 a r&j~tioaehip, a c a a s h p p r i ~ t 6 ~ . ~ kdf~rn~~drn, ~d p ~ t CW&JC~ it ~~~6 s+lc9 33 kjxzsaa I j 4 f

FAX N o ,

1. On the First through Fourth Causes of Action Far:

(a) Actud damages ta be determined at trial plus PC- and post-judgment

inrpxest againat Defendmts;

@) Punitive damages; and, I

1

2

3

(c) A ~ m y s ' fees and costs;

9 I 2. On the First through Fourth and Firurth Ceuse of Action For:

against the Defendants fmm entering into the Asevrti m a e t for a period of no less than two

years-

PRAYER FOR R E L m

(a) An order pdiminaLiJy enjoining Mendants, tbeir agents, servants, I eapbyem cendamigns md all b s s acting inconcext with them fbm engaging I in sdca M marketing activity related m the Asanti grille mar&;

3. On the Rwtt Came of Action for mi w~ur i thg under ihe k-ms of &s

iqpxmnt; ~ x d ,

15 11 4. 3 n All Cmes of Action For: I I I

I6 /I (a) 8u& o ~ k r and fwt&er sekf is &Ye Cvm may jrem jusr

I PKPI1WB BOR , ' m y T U

Plaint5 hereby dsmmds ttjd by jrq ~a rll d&ns *ht are triable by jury.

25

26 1 t I

I

I 1, I

FA)! N o .

SUPERLOR COURT QP CALIFURNJ3, COUNTY OF RZVERSIDE 4058 Main Streat ~ivesside, CA 92591

WWY .riverside. courts-ca-gav

3r3.3TLCE OF PSSXGEP?FET 'ZC GZPARTMZI FOB CASE WAGEMEKC PURPOSE6 m CQ-SE: ?C"UYAGEM~ ~ ~ T B ~ N C P ; (m 3 .7 a2 1

This tnae is assigned te the Knmrable Judge #as R. Fisbec De~ar tMerxt (16 as case managwent bz;artrwnt.

The% Case M~FagaTEat Coo2ezenee is az=-mdded for; ~ 5 / 9 2 / 1 ~ ak B : 3C1 ia r\epartmer.k bG.

I ce;rtify t.l-rcak I I the Buperiur Cr)& QE C a f i E o d a , C3mty of! I am not a p r r t ~ CO this act5orr t 3 ~ proceeding- jSarpc.QL+sr % t A the practices and pror-sC*zres used miling of c o r r e e p e ~ ~ m , S m h coneapcu16ence . - is G E I ~ E I I S L ~ ~ ~ tila! outgging ;nail of 55- eupr r io r Co:?xt, EU.Z~Q?. .T=~ SSLL i s d c l , ~ v m ; r ~ ~ pa ~ $ 3 3ziS.ed 5y t!ii zn;t~3. s S t ~ t ~ 8 ,OUBczl s ~ ~ W ~ C B , paizCa.g% i5k~pa.li3, tiaraf: of b ~ f i i ~ e s o . 'i certfQF t h ~ c , L 9 e w ~ k .$ _RW- of the f z s c s ~ z n g fiaklee 5~ rfiia &ape, ; ~ ~ ~ l ; , : ~ + ~ A i~. i% ~ L C - I COPY BE. ~i.S2;&6 3&otV2, csred: ";3/25jJ.o

4 p n ~ ~ r J c...-L..,r- ipc&chc '4,- ~ f f k e r ; r i l &

w 3y:

L - I -ES'K-FEmC% ! u e p ~ k y CLEZZ

FAX 1Jo.

StlPERQR C6UW OF CALIFORNIA, C O U W GF RIVERSIDE LUI

AOtw=iaWe Dispute Resolution W~:!?riverside;courts,ca .qovladr/adr.hm.

Serving the Atternathfe D1sp.W ResolutJon (ADR) Inbnnal3aa Package

Prtrsuant 'to CF3gj.forrrta Rule of C a r t 3.221(c), tn all general &Q case6 thar plaint'Hf mtmt serve a copy of the AIternMve Dispute Reso;utkm @DR) inZbmYmn package on each defendant tagether with the wmpl~i;it- .

Cmss-sam@ain~a midst eewe e ccici cif the MemaQjve B"ipub ResslMan .(AmU\ 1 C-- ,,. ., .n,-., ,,,ticn pa&age sn any W parfie% to the adon bga?her wit! me ~ ~ ~ & w ~ ~ , p ; a k k ~

To obbin P copy of flle Courtle A!&rns!iw D&pdP3 Resoition infaiiTla'ii~n pacMge, access the Caurfs v.t&site and type &a fullnving link ~ : ~ ~ d v e r ~ t d a ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ c 1 t ] : v i a d ~ i a d r d v . ~ ~ or go to f h ~ ! Fees & Foms l!nk and sfick an the ASR :riforma?isn Wcka~c,

GqLes d the C w e s i3stpute Readutlon infomdan p k s g a are afao GvaiFaSIe et t ! e ClerXe CEca

FAX 140.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CWFORWIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE -www,.~ersibe.cmrts.ca.q~

Self-represented parties: h~f!rivwide.wurt~p,~I~~eld~tfh~!~.htm

ALTERNATWE DISPUTE R€SOLWlON (ADR] 1WWMA'PION PAeKROE

(California Rubs of Cuurt, Rule 8221; Local Rub, LC):

- W E PLAINtW MUST SERVE THS &ImRMlaT%W FAWAGE - --- 8H EACH P A W WIT! WE mweFT, - _I Uva?abutxs & AS% s F e d ADR w%n bs dace k e 4 433 S~~ SJV%I&I ~mtPla a* i?ihg -ihs of3!3p!~k?? - G=ev&*,r ---: F-A--

.-, ,, ,,up rw- csrn w e mu13 wad w+-.2?q~e4 e!?d &!W-E -9, s Ma.- cz~-: "GEE L i m e 9& AD3 pr- and provider,

! -A- A-& . la A h A--- L-C*---?ka S a A&--- --- r..L(;- n a a ,A- u --- .-.-I.-. m-. . 1'2 =,.. ,=. . . I I U L . . N I . . .,I YI ,.-.- I ,.,,.

FAX N o ,

c, want t~ avoid Wal, but stB1 want a. naufmT person to dgcrde fFla o u t w m of tha dase

ArbltreRlon b not awX'O~rie when b e mes: do not weant- to risk going through bath arbitration and trial (Judicial Arbitration) do natwenr toglvsup their right to trial (binding erbbe4ion)

Set t lmwt Conferences: SettfemmC confwrwcss are simnar tu rndiafjm, but ths set t lamt officer usually Wes .to negdate an agreement by gfving sitrong opinlans about the ~ t r Wand weakn-eee of the mse, I t s mcnetay value, and the probable outcome at fieI?ettrernent oonbrences rrffan involve attorneys mare than the psrUse and offen taka piece d m to the trW dab.

R-3E t2OU;hPBFP BUPERI[)R COURT ADR R W I W E P I T 8 AS?? !?%-~22% zz! I-,E rn p s b b &n Stre ADR w e b s k ~ I r k e d d e - c d r t a r t a r t a m . ~ w I W h ~

rqu~;stirrg a trial date and to padicipde in a s~@mrnt conferenwit before We!. (Lead Rule, 4.0066)

r Yaur pmfesenoeo for rndks€lcm ~r on

3, % piiqni~r& b fie3 th judge yrwr p-efs~tenca for meaiairan csr armtion and the data y&ei !$= ezt& =!g= 5

FAX N o .

GorJR-Ordetrert ADR: " HcjrBfli& fm~Court-Ordawlf M e o r 3 U d l c U A f b l ~ & n WLh ddmmined at tho CesaManapmmt CiMmmc~. ~f

d[giMe, the paitleu w e t~ parkipate h:

' -a Metdidaft ~ ~ u d ~ r b l t r a t l a n (rron*)

AROmGY OR FAm W W A - flm Sf& W e , d C o i I R T ~ ~ Y

PHWe A D R -If thecma Is not sllgbim 60r C o u r t - C h d ~ MLedietim w Judicial AfMtntlon, the parties q m a b psr8dpate In the . A M v, Vmrch May Mil arrange I@ pay foewffhwt court W e m e n t :

lEt5'HCIwN€l,- P(U(=tQrJm@R

W a - A D R ~ (OpLlsnnB: )rmmJEy FORUV~IWI:

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALiFORNIA, COUNTY OF FWERSSDE

€3 Banning -155 M. Al;.csandm Rued, Bannhg, CA %SZ0 Hemet - BBO Id- State Street Hemet CA 82543 El IndIo 46200 Oada B h d , Indlu, CA 92201 Riverside - 4U50 M0ln Street, R W d r . CA -01 Ternemla - 47002 Counv G e m Drhra, BI~IJ. C - S* tDa Tme- GA 02!Bf PUIImFF(Qr

DEFENOANTtm

PRINT NAME OF WXW DR A ~ E Y SIGNANRE OF P m OR AITDRNEV a P l a l n O f l ~ Daofmbnt

- CASEMJMBER

f 3TlWUtTION FOR-ALTERNATRW DISPUfe FtfSOLUnON (AD!?) m t = ~ ~ r a e R p J c e a 4 ~ m w

(CRG 3,221; Local Rule, Title 4)