feasibility study epbd article 19a · 2020-01-15 · on epc rating (epc e-f-g =90%, d=70%, c=32%,...

Contract ENER/C3/2018-447/05

Feasibility study EPBD article 19a

2nd stakeholder meeting

Brussels, 28 November 2019

ENER/C3/2018-447/05

Policy optionsBuilding renovation passport

Jonathan Volt (BPIE)

ENER/C3/2018-447/05 2

Outline

1. Direct policy measures

2. Types of supportive policy measures

3. Overview of six selected policy packages

4. Deep dive: explaining the BRP impact

ENER/C3/2018-447/05 3

3 main policy options for the EU to consider

ENER/C3/2018-447/054

LEAVE TO MEMBER STATES

Policy package 1

(Soft)

Policy package 2

(Stringent)

COMMON REFERENCE FRAMEWORK

Policy package 3

(Soft)

Policy package 4

(Stringent)

FUTURE EPBD REQUIREMENT

Policy package 5

(Soft)

Policy package 6

(Stringent)

Types of measures

ENER/C3/2018-447/05 5

Policy package

Direct measure

Supportive measures

Enabling measures

Policy measures

Financial instruments

Legislative instruments

Policy package 0 - Status Quo

ENER/C3/2018-447/05 6

Supportive measures from EU

Voluntary and unfacilitated best practice exchange

MS decide whether to design and implement BRP

No regulation or formal guidance from EU level


Show how BRP can support LTRS (EPBD art. 2a) preparation

and objectives

Increase awareness through national/local communication

campaigns

Introduce training programmefor energy experts

Encourage MS to set up financial support schemes

linked to BRP



Policy package 1 (Soft)

ENER/C3/2018-447/05 7

Input(policy package)

Process(impact on BRPs)

Output(Impact categories)


Dir

ect

mea

sure

Communication campaign

EU Encourage BRPs through LTRS

Sup

po

rtiv

e m

easu

re

Training of energy experts

Subsidies the cost for the development of the BRP

5 additional MS to implement BRPs

If o

mit

ted

→im

pac

t *

80

%

If o

mit

ted

→im

pac

t *

50

%

If o

mit

ted

→im

pac

t *

80

%

• Implemented as an optional add-on toEPCs

• 6% of people getting an EPC opts for theadditional BRP

∆ BRPs [#]

∆ Renovation rate [%] and depth [%]

• Every BRP triggers renovation dependingon EPC rating (EPC E-F-G =90%, D=70%,C=32%, B=30%)

• Average energy saving between first andfinal step: 45%

• Share that completes all steps of theBRP: 60%

Energy savings

CO2-emissions

Estimated improvement of EPC ratings

Triggered private investments

Health benefits

Increase in on-site renewables

Policy package 1

Public investment

Residential energy expenditure

ENER/C3/2018-447/05

8



and objectives

Increase awareness through

national/local communication

campaigns

Introduce training programme for energy experts

Encourage MS to set up financial

support schemes linked to BRP

Develop guidelines on how banks can offer favourable interest rate for

loans/ mortgages

Make BRP mandatory for certain building segments after

2030



Policy package 2 (Stringent)

ENER/C3/2018-447/05 9





Dir

ect

mea

sure



Sup

po

rtiv

e m

easu

re






• BRP mandatory for buildings with EPClabel E-F-G after 2030 and D after 2040 inimplementing MS

∆ BRPs [#]




• Share that completes all steps of theBRP: 65%, 20%

Policy package 2

Develop guidelines on how banks can offer favourable interest rates rate

Make BRP mandatory for certain building segments after 2030

Energy savings

CO2-emissions



Health benefits


Public investment for different policy packages


ENER/C3/2018-447/05 10


Supportive measures for the EU


and objectives



campaigns


Set up a forum of best practices

exchange

Guidelines on how BRP can be

integrated with EPC and combined with

a logbook

Support regional energy advice

centres

Introduce a common European reference framework for the BRP

Guidance on how MS can introduce the BRP

ENER/C3/2018-447/05 11




Introduce a common reference framework

Dir

ect

mea

sure



Sup

po

rtiv

e m

easu

re





∆ BRPs [#]


• Every BRP triggers renovation dependingon EPC rating (EPC E-F-G =90%, D=70%,C=32%, B=30%,)

• Due to lack of F.3 the impact above willbe 50% lower



Policy package 3

Support BRP through regional energy advice centres and one-stop shops

Forum for best practices exchange

Guidance documents

Energy savings

CO2-emissions



Health benefits




ENER/C3/2018-447/05 12



Show how BRP can support LTRS

(EPBD art. 2a) preparation and

objectives

Common EU framework for certification of

building experts carrying out BRPs

Increase awareness

through national/local

communication campaigns

Encourage MS to set up financial

support schemes linked to BRP


Guidelines on how BRP can be integrated with

EPC and combined with a

logbook

Encourage MS to set up a bonus that is trigger when certain

steps of the BRP are accomplished

Introduce a common European reference framework for the BRP

Guidance how MS can introduce the BRP, incl. minimum requirements on what the instrument should comprise

ENER/C3/2018-447/05 13




Introduce a common reference framework

Dir

ect

mea

sure



Sup

po

rtiv

e m

easu

re





∆ BRPs [#]





Policy package 4

Common EU framework for certification of building experts


Guidance documents


Bonus triggered when a certain % of stages in the BRP have been

implementedIncrease average depth

Energy savings

CO2-emissions



Health benefits




ENER/C3/2018-447/05 14



Subsidies the cost for the

development of the BRP

Increase awareness

through national/local

communication campaigns

Introduce training

programme for energy experts

Guidelines on how banks can

offer a favourable

interest rate for loans/ mortgages

Encourage MS to introduce progressive funding for packages of measures

recommended by the BRP

Encourage MS to set up a

bonus that is trigger when certain steps

of the BRP are accomplished

Set up a forum of best

practices exchange of BRP design

and implementatio

n

Guidelines on how BRP can be integrated with EPC and

combined with a digital

logbook

Incorporate BRPs as a requirement under the EPBD

Expand Article 11 of the EPBD to incorporate BRPs

ENER/C3/2018-447/05 15





Dir

ect

mea

sure


Sup

po

rtiv

e m

easu

re


All MS to implement BRPs



∆ BRPs [#]





Policy package 5


Guidance documents


Bonus triggered when a certain % of stages in the BRP have been

implemented

Lower interest rate on loans taken for measures linked to a BRP/ Progressive subsidies for measures linked to BRP

Energy savings

CO2-emissions



Health benefits




ENER/C3/2018-447/05 16





campaigns


Introduce minimum energy efficiency

standard for buildings

BRP mandatory for every building sold

after 2030

BRP mandatory for all buildings with

EPC below class D by 2030

Buildings with EPC below class D can

only be sold if step 1-2 of renovation

roadmap implemented by

2035


Expand Article 11 of the EPBD to incorporate BRPs

ENER/C3/2018-447/05 17





Dir

ect

mea

sure


Sup

po

rtiv

e m

easu

re


All MS to implement BRPs


• BRP mandatory for every building soldand lower EPC classes (assumed 80%compliance)

• 3% of people with EPC of higher labelsopts for the additional BRP

∆ BRPs [#]





Policy package 6

Introduce minimum energy efficiency standard for renovation

Make the BRP mandatory for all buildings with EPC from class E from

2030 and from class D from 2040

BRP mandatory for every building sold after 2030 with EPC from class C

Buildings with EPC below class D can only be sold if step 1-2 of renovation roadmap implemented by 2030 and

below C from 2040

Energy savings

CO2-emissions



Health benefits




ENER/C3/2018-447/05 18

Bu

ildin

g R

eno

vati

on

Pas

spo

rt

Deep dive: impact of BRP on renovation/energy savings

New renovations triggered

Increased renovation quality/depth

Savings that happen earlier than planned

20% of renovations have been triggered by the BRP

Energy saving per renovation case is estimated to be 11 – 25 percentage

points higher over 15 years

80% of the renovations that have already been planned (not triggered by BRP) is estimated to occur 1 year

earlier thanks to the instrument

Tota

l en

ergy

sav

ings

ENER/C3/2018-447/05 19

Thank you…

www.bpie.eu

@BPIE_eu

Jonathan Volt

BPIE

[email protected]

http://www.google.ro/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=low+energy+buildings&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=upVcisGLTJpqDM&tbnid=yH-PeDwyiyrxHM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://www.futureagenda.org/pg/cx/view/415&ei=oXNUUe_FNYKq0QXZgoCQCA&bvm=bv.44442042,d.d2k&psig=AFQjCNFhcxC6hsvEyGjmHdgVEmiLj-8SlQ&ust=1364575464363580

This study is a service contract with the European Commission’s Directorate General for Energy and has received funding under contract ENER/C3/2018-447/05.

The information and views set out in these slides are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission's behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of

the information contained therein.

These slides have been prepared by the authors to the best of their knowledge and ability. The authors do not assume liability for any damage that may arise for the use of the report or the information contained herein.

ENER/C3/2018-447/05

feasibility study epbd article 19a · 2020-01-15 · on epc rating (epc e-f-g =90%, d=70%, c=32%,...

Documents