feb 2010 portland same presentation vs 1.6

61
Contract No. W9127N-09-C-0026 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Portland District Columbia River Channel Improvements (CRCI) Rock Removal 2009

Upload: svandegrift

Post on 16-May-2015

517 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Drilling, Blasting and Dredging on the Columbia River

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Contract No. W9127N-09-C-0026

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Portland District

Columbia River Channel Improvements (CRCI) Rock Removal 2009

Page 2: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6
Page 3: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Vital U.S. Export Gateway

Primary international export gateway for 11 states in the Pacific Northwest & Upper Midwest

1st in the nation for U.S. wheat exports 2nd largest export gateway on West Coast3rd in the world for grain exports

Construction Contracts

FY 2005 Great LakesFY 2006 Bean/StuyvesantFY 2007 J.E McAmis Inc./ Consolidated Rock at Port of VancouverFY 2007 - 2008 Great Lakes FY 2009 J.E. McAmis Inc.

Page 4: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6
Page 5: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Congressional Study Resolution Aug 89Feasibility Study Initiated Apr 94Draft Feasibility Report/EIS Oct 98Final Feasibility Report/EIS Aug 99Oregon CZMA Dec 99USFWS and NMFS Bi-Ops Dec 99Project Authorization Dec 99

NMFS Bi-Op Withdraw Aug 00State Water Quality Denials Sep 00Corps Reinitiates Consultation Sept 00

Corps Decides to Supplement Jan 02Integrated Feasibility Report/EIS

Washington State Environmental Policy Act-- Port of Longview; Lead Agency

NMFS and USFWS Bi-Ops May 02Draft Supplemental EIS Jul 02Final Supplemental EIS Jan 03

Page 6: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

St. Helen’s Area550,000 SF Drilling and Blasting500,000 CY Dredging

Longview Area2,500,000 CY Dredging

CRCI 2009 PROJECT COMPONENTS

Page 7: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

ST. HELENS PROJECT COMPONENTS

Page 8: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Test Dig Electrical Resistivity Testing Seismic Refraction Exploration

ST. HELENS AREA PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION

Page 9: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Test Dig Sample Characteristics

Page 10: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Introduction: To help determine the extent of basalt bedrock and the degree of fracturing in the study area.

Electrical Resistivity Exploration

Page 11: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Electrical Resistivity Exploration

Page 12: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Seismic Refraction ExplorationAll of the bedrock velocities measured in this study exceeded 14,600 ft/sec.

Page 13: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Seismic Refraction Exploration

Page 14: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Rock would require preparation by blasting and efficient dredging of prepared rock would not be feasible by any means other than a large excavator type dredge.

Conclusions of Preliminary Investigations

Page 15: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Type of explosives Blasting platform & support equipment Preparation and loading of blast holes Compliance with blast induced effects:

◦ Underwater overpressure◦ Ground vibration

Blast Patterns Schedule

Determining Proper Blasting Methods

Page 16: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Blasting Platform and Support Equipment

Page 17: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Drilling Template

Page 18: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Dynamic Positioning System

Page 19: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Dynamic Positioning System

Page 20: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Dynamic Positioning System

Page 21: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Drilling Operations

Page 22: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Drilling Operations

Page 23: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Drilling Operations

Page 24: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Drilling Operations

Page 25: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Preparing Charge

Page 26: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

CAST BOOSTER

Page 27: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Preparing Charge

Page 28: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Loading Holes

Page 29: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Loading Holes

Page 30: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Loading Holes

Page 31: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

HYDROMITE 1500 NYC

Page 32: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Measuring Holes

Emulsions Measurement

MEASUREMENT

Page 33: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Stemming Holes

Page 34: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

INITIATION SYSTEM

Page 35: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Typical Section of Loaded Hole

Page 36: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Series of Loaded Holes

Page 37: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Typical Overview of Production Blast

Page 38: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Inspection of Shot Lines

Page 39: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Two Hour- 15 Minute- 5 Minute- Countdown- BLAST!!! All Clear for Survey Channel Reopened for

Commercial Traffic

Notifications:

Page 40: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Fire in the Hole

Page 41: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6
Page 42: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6
Page 43: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6
Page 44: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6
Page 45: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6
Page 46: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6
Page 47: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6
Page 48: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6
Page 49: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6
Page 50: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6
Page 51: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6
Page 52: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6
Page 53: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Dredging and Disposal Operations

Page 54: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Dredge Positioning

Page 55: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Outcome

Page 56: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Shipping Coordination

Page 57: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Shipping Coordination

Page 58: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Shipping Coordination

Page 59: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

100% of dredge prism taken to grade 500,000 cubic yards of material transported

to Ross Island Lagoon for environmental remediation

No water quality violations No negative environmental impacts

Results

Page 60: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Total number of holes drilled: 3,750 holes + Total pounds of explosives: 240,000 lbs (120 tons) + Total feet of shot line: 1,000,000 lf + Total number of blasts: 95 blasts Total number of drilling days: 85 days Total number of jobs created: 75 (60 local jobs) Total number of man hours: 35,000 hours Total number of square feet blasted: 550,000 sf Total number of cubic yards removed: 500,000 cy Total number of lost time accidents: 0 Total number of environmental incidents: 0 Total number of salmonoids/steelhead taken: 0 Total number of marine mammals harmed: 0 Total percentage of time ahead of schedule: 25%

Final Project Numbers

Page 61: Feb 2010 Portland Same Presentation Vs 1.6

Questions?