SDMS DocID 2089794 \ . . -

DCN: TO-008-06-12-001-DCN113

Sampling QA/QC Work Plan

Kessel Lumber Site

Keyser, Mineral County, West Virginia

TDD No: W13-008-06-12-001

Contract: EP-S3-05-03 February 06, 2007

^ ^ < TechLaw Q u a l i t y & I n t e g r i t y

Submitted To: Don McLaughlin, On-Scene Coordinator United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region III

Philadelphia Office 1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029

AR100039

J i..

Sampling QA/QC Work Plan

Kessel Lumber Site

Prepared by TechLaw, Inc.

February 06, 2007

TDDNo.: W13-008-06-12-001 EPA Contract.No.: EP-S3-05-03

APPROVALS

Name

Suddha Graves

Gene Nance

Don McLauglin

Title

START Project Manager

START QA Coordinator

EPA OSC

Signatiire Date

AR100040

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section Page

TABLE OF CONTENTS i

1.0 INTRODUCTION .2

2.0 BACKGROUND 2

3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION . ,4

4.0 PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES 4

5.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .: ., 4 5.1 Objective v.. . 4

5.2 Scope of Work 5

6.0 DATA USE OBJECTIVES , 5

7.0 SAMPLING APPROACH AND ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS '. 5 7.1 Sampling Design/Analytical'Methodology 5

7.1.1 Surface and Subsurface Soil Samples 6 7.1.2 Sediment Samples ; . 7 7.1.3 Waste Samples . 7 7.1.4 Surface Water Samples . 7

7.2 Sampling Equipment and Decontamination 8 7.3 Investigation-Derived Wastes .8 7.4 Sample Identification Numbers 8

7.4.1 CLP Samples .8 . 7.4.2 DAS Samples 9

8.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL (QA/QC) PROCEDURES . 10 8.1 Quality Control of Field Activities 10 8.2 Sample Documentation 10

8.2.1 Field Logbook 10 8.2.3 Chain of Custody Record 12 8.2.4 Custody seals 13

8.3 Sample Packaging, Storage, and Shipping ; : . . . , 13 8.4 Field QC Samples 13 8.5 Laboratory QC . . 14 8.6 Data Validation 14

AR100041

.1' I

9.0 SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES , 14

10.0 DELIVERABLES 15

TABLES

Table 1, Field and QA/QC Sampling Summary Table 2, Sample Analytical Requirements Summary

ATTACHMENTS

Figure 1, Site Location Map Figure 2, Proposed Sample Location Map

n

AR100042

1.0 INTRODUCTION (

On December 04, 2006, EPA tasked TechLaw, Inc. to initiate a site assessment which included the collection of samples fi'om the Kessel Lumber Site located on Rockland Farm Drive Lane, Keyser, Mineral Coimty, West Virginia. Sampling activities are scheduled to be conducted during the month of March 2007, and will be conducted under the Superfund Technical Assessment and Response Team (START) Contract No. EP-S3-05-03, Technical Direction Docuirient (TDD) Number Wl3-008-06-12-001.

The primary goal of the sampling activities is:

Characterize the presence and extent of contamination at the site by collecting and analyzing surface and subsurface soil, sediment, surface water, and waste samples from the site.

2.0 BACKGROUND

The site is situated at the prior location of the Kessel Lumber Company, which operated a chromated copper arsenate (CCA) wood treatment facility and a sawmill at the site until December 2004. The site has been the focus of several West Virginia Department of Enviromnental Protection (WVDEP) inspections. The facility is covered by WV/NPDES permit No. WV0079405. On November 9, 2005, WVDEP performed a Pre-Closure Inspection at the Site to ensure that the facility did not leave any unknown contaniination or other environmental problems for others to deal with. As a result of the Pre-Closure Inspection, arsenic was found at concentrations up to 30,200 mg/kg, and chromium up to 27,600 mg/kg.

WVDEP contacted EPA Region III arid requested that they take the lead in conducting a full assessment at the site and take any necessary actions in mitigating the threats at the site. -

EPA received consent to access the property and on December 19, 2006, EPA and START met on site and performed a site walkthrough to identify potential sampling locations. The following are observations noted by EPA and START following the site walkthrough.

EPA and START observed evidence of trespassers, unlocked doors to facility, and a large section of a side wall missing. The access road gate was unlocked. There was an unlocked gate on the access road leading to the facility. Electricity was still on at the facility even though the facility was supposed to have been shut down in December 2004.

• The CCA wood treatment process had been conducted inside a building. A drip pad was located at the front entrance to the facility. The drip pad had a concrete floor, was roofed, and was walled on three sides. The drip pad contained a

AR100043

railroad track which led into a pressure treatment vessel located inside the building. The conci-ete floor had been sloped to a sump located between the rail line and the pressure treatment vessel. The sump had been filled over with concrete. Green staining was present on and surrounding the rail line leading to the vessel.

A large stack of suspected treated lumber was stacked outside on the ground at the front of the facility. A small drainage ditch ran directly behind the stack of wood.

• Inside the facility was 2 large vertical tanks which had contained pure CCA product. There was secondary containment surroimding these tanks. Two large horizontal pressure treatment tanks were in the building. One of the pressure treatment tanks was approximately 75 feet long and was used as the primary pressure treatment vessel. The other pressure treatment vessel was approximately, 40 feet long and was initially installed for creosote treatment. Mr. Kessel, however, later noted that creosote treatment was never performed at the facility. There were 3 tanks inside the building that had been used as mixing tanks, and one mixing tank outside at the rear of the facility. The outside mixing tank was an old rail car that had been converted to a mixing tank. This tank had no secondary containment and was open on top with just a shed covering the opening.

• There was a saw mill located behind the main building. Left over equipment and saw dust was still present.

• There was a dumping area for lumber refuse (saw dust and wood chips) located across Hoffman Run behind the facility. Mr. Kessel later noted that ho treated luriiber refuse was present in this dumping area.

• There were six monitoring wells surrounding the facility installed under West Virginia's groundwater protection act. These monitoring wells had been required to be sampled quarterly. Mr. Kessel had provided WVDEP copies of sampling reports from 2003 - 2005. Sample results had been near or below minimum detection limits during this period.

On January 4, 2007, EPA and START met on site with Mr. Kessel, the property owner. Mr. Kessel provided a tour of the site and an explanation of the CCA wood treatment process.

AR100044

The contaminants of concern are:

Contaminant Concentration

Metals:

Arsenic (As) Up to 30,200 mg/kg

Chromium (Cr) Up to 27,600 mg/kg

3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION

The Kessel Lumber Site is located in Keyser, Mineral County, West Virginia, at approximate geographic coordinates 39.38552 degrees north latitude and -79.02438 degrees west longitude. The site is located adjacent to Route 972S, approximately 1/10 mile northwest (upstream) of the confluence of New Creek and Hoffrnan Rim. The site was part of a large lumber facility spread out at different locations throughout the immediate area. The site was the location that the Kessel Lumber Company conducted CCA wood treatment offence posts and mine lumber. The site is bordered to the west and south by Hoffman Run, which flows in a southeast direction for approximately 1/10 mile where it confluences with New Creek. The site is bordered to the north and east by a drainage ditch which flows into Hoffman Run. A wooded area is located northwest of the site, and to the west, across Hoffman Run, is a large disposal area approximately 2 acres in size, comprised of wood waste containing sawdust and woodchips mixed with soil. The site terrain is predominantly flat, with a sloping hill to the north where residences are located. A residential home is also located southeast of the site. The grade, of the site allows runoff from the site to flow south into Hoffman Run.

4.0 PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES

EPA work assignment manager (WAM), OSC Don McLaughlin, will provide overall direction to TechLaw, Inc. staff concerning project sampling requirements, objectives, and schedule. START Project Manager (PM) Suddha Graves is the primary point of contact with the EPA OSC; The PM is responsible for the development arid completion of the Sampling QA/QC Work Plan, project team organization, and supervision of all project tasks, including reports and deliverables.

5.0 PJIOJECT DESCRIPTION

5.1 Objective

AR100045

This sampling plan describes the efforts to investigate potential contaminants at the Kessel Lumber Site. The main objective of this assessment is to characterize potential contamination in tanks, surface soil, subsurface soil, sediment, and surface water at the site. Data from this sampling event will be used to determine the presence and extent of contamination at the site.

5.2 Scope of Work

The scope of work includes collection of waste samples from tanks, surface soil, subsurface soil, sediment, and surface water samples. All samples will be collected as grab samples. 'Sampling locations are described in Section 7 and are depicted in Figure 3.

6.0 DATA USE OBJECTIVES

The following data quality objectives apply to this project:

Program Area Sampling Objective Data Type

Superfiind Removal Determine presence/extent of . Definitive

contamination

The analytical data obtained will be used to determine the presence and extent of contamination at the site.

7.0 SAMPLING APPROACH AND ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS i

7.1 Sampling Design/Analytical Methodology

EPA approved, or START TechLaw, Inc., Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), will be utilized whenever possible.

Sample collection activities will occur as summarized below. All sampling will be conducted in accordance with the EPA approved Kessel Lumber Site Health and Safety Plan.

All samples will be shipped to a laboratory pre-arranged through the EPA Region III Office of Analytical Services and Quality Assurance (OASQA) Ghent Services Team (CST). The laboratory will analyze the samples using Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) Statement of Work (SOW) ILM05.3 for Target Analyte List (TAL) Metals in

AR100046

surface soil, subsurface soil, and sediment. In addition select samples will be analyzed for Target Compound List (TCL) Organics.

See Tables 1 and 2 for a summary of the numbers of samples, matrices, analytical methods, quality control (QC) samples, sample preservation, and container requirements.

7.1.1 Surface and Subsurface Soil Samples

The objective of the surface and subsurface sampling is to horizontally and vertically delineate the extent of contamination at the site. Approximate surface and subsurface soil sampling locations are depicted in Figure 2. START will collect subsurface soil samples from 15 locations, with each location consisting of two samples. Six locations will be from under the concrete pad and nine locations will be from outside the building. Surface soil samples will be collected from 19 locations, with 9 of the samples coming S:om the same location as the subsurface soil samples. The subsurface soil samples will be collected utilizing a Geoprobe''"'̂ .

7.1.1.1 Surface and Subsurface Soil Sampling Design/Analytical Methodology

For the purposes of this investigation, surface soil will be defined as soil from 0 to 6 inches below ground surface (bgs) and subsurface soil will be from depths greater than 6 inches bgs. Surface samples will be collected using dedicated plastic scoops. START will place the surface soil into a clean aluminum pan and thoroughly homogenized prior to transferring it into pre-cleaned jars. Subsurface soil samples will be collected using a subcontracted Geoprobe^", or comparable direct push technology (DPT) equipment. Each soil core will be collected using a Geoprobe '̂̂ with a 2.125-inch diameter by 4-foot length macro core sampler that will be direct-pushed into the ground at each sampling location. The macro core sampler will be lined with dedicated acetate liners and supplied with end caps to contain the core. The maximum depth of soil boring is not expected to exceed 8 ft bgs. It is anticipated that bedrock or groundwater will be encountered prior to reaching 8 ft. bgs. The recovered soil core will be screened using visual inspection and a X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) unit prior to collecting the subsurface soil samples. A subsurface soil sample will be collected from the 4 ft. soil coring based on the sampler's determination. The sampler's decision on where to collect the sample within each 4 ft. core maybe determined by amount of recovery, type of recovery (i.e. rocky substrate, organic leaf or roots, debris, etc), visual discoloration, etc. The sample will be collected by placing the selected material from the core into a clean aluminum pan and throughly homogenized prior to transferring it into pre-cleaned jars. Each surface and subsurface soil sample will be sent to a laboratory for TAL Inorganics analysis, and at select locations, for TCL Organics.

The sample jars will be placed into sample coolers and stored on ice at 4° Celsius, until the samples are shipped to the appropriate laboratory. Laboratory services will be

AR100047

requested through the EPA Region ill Office of Aiialytical Services Quality Assurance (OASQA) Client Services Team CST.

7.1.2 Sediment Samples

START will collect up to 5 sediment samples from the site. The samples will be collected from the drainage ditch located north and northwest of the facility and from Hoffrnan Run located east of the facility. Samples locations will be determined at the time of collection by START personnel based on slow areas or pools in the stream. One sample will be collected in Hofftnan Run upstream of the facility and continue downstream past the facility. One sediment sample will also be collected from the confluence of Hoffrnan Run and New Creek. START will collect the samples at depths of 0" to 6" below ground surface (bgs) using dedicated plastic scoops. START will place the sediment into a clean aluminum pan and thoroughly homogenized prior to transferring it into pre-cleaned jars. The sediment samples will be analyzed for TAL Metals.

7.1.3 Waste Samples

START will collect up to 7 waste samples from the tanks, 2 waste samples from the residue under the rails within the drip pad area, and 2 waste samples from under the grates behind the facility. START will not enter any confined spaces to collect the waste samples. All health and safety procedures set forth in the health and safety plan will be followed. START will attempt to collect the samples in a manner where health and safety will not be compromised. Waste samples will be categorized into hazard classification utilizing the HAZCAT method. This will provide information on how the samples will need to be packaged and shipped.

7.1.4 Surface Water Samples

START will collect up to 4 surface water samples from Hoffinan Run and the drainage ditch located on the site. The furthest downstream surface water sample will be collected first to prevent cross contarriination of samples. The samples will be collected in accordance with TechLaw SOP 08-02-00, Surface Water Sampling and Analysis Procedures. All surface water samples will be analyzed for TAL Metals and will be collected in a one-liter polyethylene bottle preserved with nitric acid to pH

7.2 Sampling Equipment and Decontamination

The subsurface soil sampling equipment will be decontaminated between sample locations. The core sampler and cutting-shoe will be decontaminated between samples using an Alconox® - water solution and scrub brush followed by a thorough rinse with distilled water. All downhole steel that was used in retrieving samples will be decontaminated between boreholes using the same cleaning method. If gross contamination is encountered, additional cleaning using an organic solvent such as isopropyl alcohol may be required, followed by an additional cycle of alconox-water wash and distilled water rinse.

7.3 Investigation-Derived Wastes

START field team members will make every effort to minimize the generation of investigation-derived wastes (IDW) throughout the field event. Disposable personal protective clothing and sampling equipment generated during field activities will be bagged and placed with the PPE generated from site removal activities. It will be disposed of with this waste stream.

Equipment decontamination water will be allowed to evaporate to the maximum extent possible or disposed in the area from which the sample(s) were collected, if gross contamination is not observed.. If gross contamination is observed, then the decontamination water will temporarily be staged until proper disposal options can be facihtated.

Other options for disposal of IDW are presented in EPA's Guide to Management of Investigation-Derived Wastes, EPA Publication 9345.3-03FS (January 1992).

7.4 Sample Identification Numbers

7.4.1 CLP Samples

Samples to be analyzed by CLP laboratories will be assigned CLP sample numbers (Nos;). The CLP sample numbers will be automatically assigned by the Forms 11 Lite''''** software. The CLP sample No. format will be as follows:

MC#### or C##### where;

MC = "MC" indicates that the sample is to be analyzed under a CLP inorganics SOW.

C = indicates that the sample is to be analyzed under a CLP organics SOW.

8 ,

AR100049

#### = numbers that will be sequentially assigned as the sample data are entered into the Forms n Lite'̂ '̂ program.

Sample Station Location Nos. will be assigned by the sampling team prior to collecting the sample and will aid in identifying the sample. The sample station location No. format will be as follows:

SS## where;

SS = indicates a surface soil sample, or

SD = indicates a sediment sample, or

SB = indicates a subsurface soil sample, or

WS = indicates a waste sample, or

SW = indicates a.surface water sample, or

RB = indicates a daily rinse sample from Geoprobe tools, or

FB = indicates a field blank sample, or

TB = indicates a trip blank sample

# # = indicates the sequential number of sample collected.

7.4.2 DAS Samples

Samples to be analyzed by laboratories assigned under DAS by EPA CST will be assigned DAS sample numbers by the samplers. The DAS sample numbers will have the following format:

R3XXXX-## where;

R3XXXX = The EPA Region HI assigned DAS project No.

##- = Sequentially assigned sample Nos. (e.g., 01 through 99)

AR100050

8.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL (QA/QC) PROCEDURES

8.1 Quality Control of Field Activities

TechLaw, Inc.'s PM is responsible for ensuring that sample quality and integrity are maintained in accordance with the QA/QC Procedures, and that the sample labeling and documentation is performed as described in Section 8.2 of this sampling plan.

8.2 Sample Documentation

All sample documentation will be completed legibly using indelible black ink. Any corrections or revisions will be made by lining through the incorrect entry and by initialing and dating the error.

8.2.1 Field Logbook

The use of field logbooks by TechLaw, Inc. for Site documentation will be consistent with TechLaw SOP 03-01-02, Field Activity Logbooks. The field logbook is essentially a descriptive notebook detailing Site activities and observations so that an accurate account of field procedures can be reconstructed. All entries will be dated and signed by the individual making the entries, and include (at a minimum) the following:

1. Site name and project number.

2. Name(s) of personnel on Site.

3. Dates and times of all entries (military time preferred).

4. Descriptions of all Site activities, including Site entry and exit times.

5. Noteworthy events and discussions.

6. Weather conditions.

7. Site observations.

8. Identification and description of samples and locations.

9. Subcontractorinformation and names of on-Site personnel.

10. Date and time of sample collections, along with chain of custody information.

11. Record of photographs.

12. Site sketches.

10

AR100051

8.2.2 Sample Labels/Tags

Sample labels and tags must clearly identify the particular sample. Required information for sample labels and tags is presented in Contract Laboratory Program Guidance for Field Samplers, EPA Pubhcation 540-R-00-003, Final (August 2004) and is provided below.

Sample bottle labels must include the following information:

1. CLP or Regional Sample number, as applicable;

2. CLP Case No. or Regional DAS Case No.;

3. Preservative(s);

4., Analysis/fraction.

Additional information may be included ori the label, such as the Station Location (Sampler-assigned sample No.), date and time collected, etc!

Sample tags must include the following information:

1. CLP or Regional Sample number, as applicable;

2. • CLP Case No. or Regional DAS Case No.;

3. Station No. And/or Station Location No. (assigned by sampler);

4. Date sample was collected (month, day, and year);

5. Time sample was collected (in military time);

6. Preservative, if any (specify "NOne" if sample is not preserved);

7. Type of sample (grab or composite);

8. Analysis/fraction requested;

9. Sampler's names/signature(s);

10. EPA Tag No.

Sample labels will be securely affixed to the sample container. Tie-on sample tags will be properly secured around the neck of the container.

11

AR100052

8.2.3 Chain of Custody Record

Proper chain of custody will be maintained from the time the sample is collected to' its final deposition. Every transfer of custody will be noted and signed. When samples (or groups of samples) are not under direct control of the individual responsible for them, they will be stored in a locked container sealed with a Custody Seal.

As per EPA Directive No. 9420.0-38, START will use FORMS H Litê M sample tracking software to prepare sample labels,, tags, and chain of custody forms/traffic reports. The Chain of Custody record/EPA Traffic Report (COC/TR) will include (at minimum) the following information:

1. CLP or Regional Sample number, as applicable;

2. CLP Case No. or Regional DAS Case No.;

3. Sample matrices;

4. Concentration (Note: Always specify "low concentration" for CLP samples unless directed otherwise by the project chemist or EPA analytical services coordinator (e.g., Client Services Team (CST);

5. Specify sample type (grab or composite);

6. Analyses requested; • ^

7. Laboratory turn around time (TAT) [Note: This does not include the TAT for data validation. If preliminary results (PR) are required, this must be specified on the COC]

8. Regional specific tracking Nos. (EPA sample Tag Nos.) and No. of containers;

Preservative(s);

Station location identifier (sampler assigned sample No.);

Date and tirrie sample collected;

Corresponding CLP organic or inorganic sample No. (if applicable).

Field QC information (identify trip/field/rinsate blanks only as "Field QC");

Specify samples to be used for laboratory QC (MS/MSD);

Name(s) and signature(s) of sampler(s);

Signature(s) of any individual(s) with control over samples;

9.

10

M ' 11' 12,

13.

14.

15.

16.

12

AR100053

17. Specify if shipment under the CLP or Regional DAS Case No. is complete (e.g., no additional sample shipments will be made under the case No.); and

18. Carrier, air bill No., and date of the shipment.

8.2.4 Custody seals

Custody seals will be used on all shipping containers used to ship samples. Custody Seals demonstrate that a container has not been tampered with or opened. The individual shipping the sample(s) will sign and date the seal, affixing it in such a manner that the container cannot be opened without breaking the seal. The name of this individual, along with a description of the sample packaging, will be noted in the field logbook. EPA Region III does not require custody seals on individual sample containers and has specifically directed samplers not to use custody seals on individual sample containers containing samples for volatile organics analysis (VOA).

8.3 Sample Packaging, Storage, and Shipping

In accordance with TechLaw SOP 04-02-00, Sample Packaging, sample containers will be labeled and shipped with a sample tag affixed to each container. Samples will be placed in plastic zipping bags. Bagged containers will be placed in appropriate transport containers and the containers will be packed with appropriate absorbent material and bubble wrap. All sample/traffic reports/COC. documents will be affixed to the underside of each transport container lid. The lid will be sealed with shipping tape and custody seals laffixed to the transport container. Transport containers will be labeled with the origin and destination locations.

Regulations for packaging, marking, labeling, and shipping of hazardous materials and wastes are promulgated by the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). Air carriers which transport hazardous materials, in particular, Federal Express, require compliance with the current International Air Transport Association (LATA) Regulations, which apply to the shipment and transport of hazardous materials by air carrier. TechLaw, Inc. will follow LATA regulations to ensure compliance.

8.4 Field QC Samples

Field QC will consist of one field duplicate for every ten field samples, or one per batch. Duplicate samples will be documented as referenced in TechLaw SOP 03-01-02, Field Activities Logbook, and on the Regional copy of the Traffic Report (TR)/COC. The field duplicate will test the reproducibility of sampling procedures and analytical procedures. A

13

AR100054

rinsate blank will be collected at a rate of one per day per piece One trip blank per cooler of samples for VOC anailysis will be prepared and analyzed for VOCs only.

8.5 Laboratory QC

Laboratory QC will be in accordance with the method/CLP requirements and the TechLaw, Inc. Statement of Work (SOW), if a TechLaw, Inc. subcontracted laboratory is used;

8.6 Data Validation

Analj^ical data for inorganic analyses will be evaluated in accordance with EPA Region III Modifications to the Laboratory Data Validation Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Inorganics Analyses (April 1993) at the IM2 Level. Analytical data for organic analyses generated under this Sampling QA/QC Work Plan will be evaluated in accordance with EPA Region III Modifications to National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Multi-Media, Multi Concentration (OLM 01.0- OLM 01.9) (September 1994) at the M3 validation. Validation for analytical services arranged through the EPA Region III CST will be accomplished by the Environmental Services Assistance Team (ESAT).

9.0 SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES

The schedule for the surface soil, subsurface soil, and sediment, sampling is proposed as follows:

Activity . Start Date End Date

Mobilize to site; recon; place flags March 2007 March 2007

Collect samples March 2007 March 2007

Ship samples March 2007 March 2007

14

AR100055

. ' 1> •

• 1 1

10.0 DELIVERABLES

The following deliverables will be provided under this project:

Analytical Data

Unvalidated data will be provided to the EPA OSC. The TAT for this data is requested as 7 days.

A Data Validation Report will be provided to the EPA OSC. The EPA Environmental Services Assistance Team (ESAT) will review and validate analytical data obtained through services arranged through the EPA OASQA CST. The EPA OASQA/ESAT will be responsible for providing this report. The TAT for the report is requested as 30 days.

Final Report

A Trip Report will be prepared to summarize the data generated under this sampling event. Further, the report will identify supportable conclusions which satisfy the objectives of this sampling QA/QC work plan.

TABLES

Table 1, Field and QA/QC Sampling Summary

Table 2, Sample Analj4ical Requirements Summary

ATTACHMENTS

Figure 1, Site Location Map

Figure 2, Proposed Sample Location Map

15

AR100056

" T A B L E 1

FIELD AND QA/QC SAMPLING SUMMARY

KESSEL LUMBER SITE

KEYSER, MINERAL COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA

Pairameter (Method)

TAL Metals

(ILM05.3)

TCL VOC

(OLM04.3)

TCL SVOC {OLM04.3)

TCL PEST/PCBs (OLM04.3)

TAL Metals

(ILM05.3)

TAL Metals

(1LM05.3)'

TAL Metals + Cyanide

(ILM05.3)

Matrix

Soil

Soil

Soil

Soil

Surface Water

Sediment

Waste

Analytical Instrument/ Detection Limits

ICP-AES/

CRQL

GC/MS / CRQL

GC/MS/ CRQL

GC/ECD/

CRQL

ICP-AES/

CRQL

ICP-AES/

CRQL

ICP-AES + titrimetric-colormetric/CRQL

Field Samples

48

4

4

4

4

5

n

BkRd

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

QC Sample Summary

Dup -

4

0

Trip' Blanks

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

Rinsate'' Blanks

2

0

1

1

0

0

0

Field' Blanks

0

0

0

0 •

1

0

0

MS/MSD

Total Field and QA/QC Analyses (not including MS/MSD)

55

6

5

5

6

6

11

Notes: 1. This QC sample will be an aqueous matrix.

2. Sample to be collected only if non-dedicated sampling equipment is used.

Key:

Bkgd = Background PEST/PCBs = Pesticides/Polychlorinated Biphenyls OLM ? CLP statement ofwork (SOW) for Organics, Low to Medium concentration.

16 TDD No.: W13-008-06-12-001

AR100057

CRQL = Contract-Required Quantitation limit. ICPAES

VOA

Dup

ECD

GC/MS

= Volatile organics analysis

= Duplicate

= Electron Capture :

= Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry

ICPMS

ILM

MDL

MS/MSI

Inductively Coupled Plasma Atoinic Emission Spectroscopy

Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectroscopy

CLP statement of work (SOW) for Inorganics, Low to Medium concentration.

Method Detection Limit

MS/MSD = Matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate.

QA/QC = Quality assurance/quality control.

SVOA = Semi-volatile organics analysis

TAL = Target Analyte List

TCL = Target Compound List

17 TDD No.: W13-008-06-12-001

AR100058

TABLE 2

SAMPLE ANALYTICAL REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY

KESSEL LUMBER SITE

KEYSER, MINERAL COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA

Analytical parameter and Metliod

TAL Metals/

ILM05.3 ICP-AES

TCL VOC Low Cone.

(OLM04.3 Method 5035A)

TCL SVOC& PEST/PCB Low Cone. (OLM04.3)

TAL Metals/

ILM05.3 ICP-MS

TAL Metals + Cyanide

(ILM05.3)

Matrix

Soil/ sediment

Soil

Soil

Water

Waste •

Sample Preservation

Ice,4'>C

Ice,4''C

Ice. 4°C

HN03, pH

ICP-AES = Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectroscopy

ICP-MS = Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectroscopy

oz = ounce

I^M = Low-to-medium (concentration)

VOC~-~ = Volatile Organic Compounds

mL = milliliter

LC = Low concentration

19 TDD No.: WI3-008-06-12-001

AR100060

o X

E

^ TechLaw Q r i n l l t y {. I i l l e f r l l f

TDD No. W13-008-0S-12.O01 START Contract No. EP-S3.05-03

KESSEL LUMBER SUPPLY SITE Figure 1. Site Location Map

1.5 3 Miles

1 inch equals 3.6 miles

Map By: SG

Date Modified: 1/19/2007

Scale: 1:225,828

Source: B n . I iy«r 0«n*rated ftom ESRI Dat i • CO 7 ArcGlS Stnat Map USA.

AR100061

^ TechLaw Q t t n l t l y r. I n t e f t r i l y

TDD No. W13-008-06-12.001 START Contract No. EP-S3.05-63

KESSEL LUMBER SUPPLY SITE Figure 2: Proposed Sample Location Map

Map By: SG

150 75 150 Feet Date Modified: 1/29/2007

1 inch equals 185.6 feet Scale: 1:2,228

Source: Aerial photo N-O10-t 1 flown in Spring of 2003. OoWnloadad trem WVGIS Tachnical Carter Projected tn WV State Plana Coordsiata Sy t tam North Zona

NOTE: Th« p repo t t d tample loct t ion i h a p a f i * * ara for rahrence purposaa only. Tha evact locations of each •ampfa win ba racordad with a GPS for tl jtura t n a.

AR100062