february 2016 corporate presentation

TSXV: FPC | WWW.FALCORES.COM | 1TSXV: FPC | WWW.FALCORES.COM

REDISCOVERING THE ROUYN-NORANDA MINING DISTRICT

REBIRTH OF THE HORNE MINE – A COMPANY MAKER

FEBRUARY 2016

WHERE 11 M OZS OF GOLD & 2.5 BN LBS OF COPPER WERE MINED HISTORICALLY

TSXV: FPC | WWW.FALCORES.COM | 2

DisclaimerThis presentation contains a review of the Company’s properties in Canada. Viewers are cautioned that the projects are at an early stage of exploration and that estimates and projections contained herein are based on limited and incomplete data. More work is required before the mineralization on the projects and their economic aspects can be confidentially modeled. Therefore, the work results and estimates herein may be considered to be generally indicative only of the nature and quality of the projects. No representation or prediction is intended as to the results of future work, nor can there be any promise that the estimates herein will be confirmed by future exploration or analysis, or that the projects will otherwise prove to be economic.

The TSX Venture Exchange has not reviewed and does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or adequacy of this presentation, which has been prepared by management. There can be no assurance that any of the assumptions in the resource estimates will be supported by a Pre-feasibility or Feasibility Study or that any forward looking event will come to pass. The data is incomplete and considerable additional work will be required to complete further evaluation, including but not limited to drilling, engineering and socio-economic studies and investment.

This presentation contains information with respect to adjacent or similar mineral properties in respect of which the Company has no interest or rights to explore or mine. Readers are cautioned that the Company has no interest in or right to acquire any interest in any such properties, and that mineral deposits on adjacent or similar properties are not indicative of mineral deposits on the Company’s properties. Past performance is no guarantee of future performance and all investors are urged to consult their investment professionals before making an investment decision. Investors are further cautioned that past performance is no guarantee of future performance

Forward-Looking StatementsCertain information included in this presentation constitutes forward-looking statements, including any information as to our projects, plans and future performance. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements. The words “expect”, “believe”, “anticipate”, “will”, “intend”, “estimate”, “forecast”, “budget”, “schedule” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of factors and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by management, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. Known and unknown factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements.

Such factors include, but are not limited to: changes to current estimates of mineral reserves and resources; labour availability; litigation; availability of and increased costs associated with contractors and exploration equipment; the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development, including the risks of obtaining necessary licenses and permits; contests over title to properties; uncertainty with the Company’s ability to secure capital to execute its business plans; changes in national and local government legislation in Canada; risk of loss due to sabotage and civil disturbances; risks arising from holding derivative instruments; and business opportunities that may be pursued by the company. Many of these uncertainties and contingencies can affect our actual results and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, us. Readers are cautioned that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance.

The company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.

Cautionary Note to U.S Investors Concerning Measured, Indicated and Inferred ResourcesThis presentation uses the terms “measured,” “indicated” and “inferred resources. We advise investors that while those terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations,the United States Securities and Exchange commission does not recognize them. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility orother economic studies. United States investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of measured or indicated mineral resources will ever be converted into mineralreserves. United States investors are also cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT


5.4 MILLION GOLD EQ OZS INDICATED&

1.3 MILLION GOLD EQ OZS INFERRED (C$65 NSR cut-off, 43-101)*

ROUYN-NORANDA, QUEBEC

* SEE JANUARY 25, 2016 FALCO PRESS RELEASE


FALCO – A QUALITY CANADIAN GOLD DEVELOPER

INVESTMENT THESIS

ROBUST INITIAL & STRATEGIC ASSET IN

HORNE 5

DESIRABLE & STRONG LAND POSITION IN

THE ABITIBI

EXPLORATION TARGETS TO DRIVE FURTHER

VALUE

GOOD CONSOLIDATION PROSPECTS LOW POLITICAL RISK FLEXIBLE BALANCE

SHEET

EXPERIENCED MANAGEMENT WITH TECHNICAL EXPERTISE

STRONG SHAREHOLDER

BASE



WHY HORNE 5? CHECKING ALL THE BOXES!

STRATEGIC ASSET: LARGE TONNAGE & SCALE, HIGHLY MECHANISED

STRONG RESOURCE GROWTH & FUTURE UPSIDE

EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE: SHAFT & OPENINGS FOR TAILINGS

CLEAR PERMITTING PROCESS IN QUEBEC

STRONG COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT & EXISTING MINING CULTURE

GREAT OPPORTUNITY TO DRIVE INNOVATION & EFFICIENCIES

PROVEN, STRONG & EXPERIENCED MINE BUILDERS


Capital Structure

Shareholder Registry

Osisko Gold Royalties 16.2%

Goodman & Company 7.5%

Raymond James 6.8%

Quebec Funds 5.7%

Pate Capital 3.7%

US Global 2.5%

Commodity Discovery Fund 1.1%

AgaNola AG 0.5%

Insiders (D&O) 3.8%

Shares Outstanding (basic) 109,983,907

Stock Options 9,910,439

Warrants 3,279,514

Shares Outstanding (fully diluted} 123,173,860

Cash (Sept 30, 2015) + FT Raise C$7.1 Million

CORPORATE SUMMARY – MINDFUL OF SHAREHOLDER DILUTION

A NEW DEVELOPMENT VEHICLE IN THE ABITIBI

Share Price Performance

0

400

800

1,200

1,600

2,000

2,400

2,800

$0.20

$0.25

$0.30

$0.35

$0.40

$0.45

30-Jun-15 31-Aug-15 31-Oct-15 31-Dec-15

VOLU

ME (IN

000'S)PRIC

E (C

$)

Closes $3.3mm FT Financing at $0.32

Closes $1.85mm Financing at $0.40

NEW RESOURCE UPDATE


LOW POLITICAL RISK – NEW MINES WILL BE BUILT IN QUEBEC

QUEBEC’S COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE


Larder Lake13 Moz Au

Kirkland Lake24 Moz Au

Timmins71 Moz Au

Rouyn-Noranda19 Moz Au

Malartic14 Moz Au

Bousquet21 Moz Au

Lennox Creek Fault Zone

Porcupine Destor Fault Zone

Cadillac Fault Zone

ONTARIOQUEBEC

Rouyn-Noranda

Timiskaming SedimentsCobalt Plate

Felsic Intrusive

Kap HighMafic/Ultramafic Volcanics

GeologyVal d’Or

14 Moz Au

Major gold mining camp

50 current and former gold and base metal mines in the Rouyn-Noranda camp Rouyn-Noranda camp has produced 19 Moz of gold and 2.9 Blbs of copper, but

underexplored for gold

0 25 50 75 100Kilometres

SOUTHERN ABITIBI GREENSTONE BELT

OVER 100 YEARS OF MINING HISTORY


Initial production

End of Mining(2.5 Blbs Cu &

11 Moz Au)

Falco acquires properties(Sep 2012)

Discovery of Horne Mine

Digitization & compilation of Horne historical drill results

(Aug 2013)

NI 43-101 Horne 5 resource estimate

(Mar 2014)

1923 1927 1976 1985 2012 2013 2014

Remnant mining(102,000 oz Au)

HORNE PROJECT

40 YEARS LATER “The year 1923 will long be remembered in Canadian mining lore as the year of the rush to Rouyn”

Leslie Roberts, Noranda

2015 2016

Confirmation Drilling Program at

Horne 5

New resource update and initial preliminary economic assessment


City of Rouyn-Noranda

Glencore Smelter

Horne Mine

Quemont Mine

Falco Surface Rights

Horne West

Horne project located in an Industrial Park

HORNE PROJECT

LOCATED NORTH OF THE CITY OF ROUYN-NORANDA


HORNE PROJECT

2016 RESOURCE ESTIMATE

2300m

Resource estimate based on:

4,384 underground drill holes at 15 spacing (305,788m) drilled by Noranda

18 new confirmation drill holes (17,300m) drilled by Falco in 2015

2,000m vertical extent, 500m to 800m in width and a thickness varying from 7 to 120m

44% of the Indicated mineral resources are located between Level 17 and Level 33, which are accessible with the current shaft depth.


ENV_B

ENV_C

ENV_D

Exchange Rate: CAD/USD = 1.27 , see resource notes in appendix

HORNE PROJECT

NEW 2016 RESOURCE ESTIMATE

Resource Class

Cut-off (NSR $C)

Tonnes (Mt)

AuEq (g/t)

Au (g/t)

Ag (g/t)

Cu (%)

Zn (%)

Contained AuEq (Moz)

Contained Au (Moz)

Contained Ag (Moz)

Contained Cu (Mlbs)

Contained Zn (Mlbs)

> 50 82.2 2.53 1.59 14.49 0.18 0.90 6.694 4.212 38.293 328.1 1,638.4 > 55 74.1 2.64 1.66 14.87 0.19 0.94 6.273 3.959 35.397 306.2 1,531.8 > 60 66.0 2.74 1.74 15.26 0.19 0.97 5.823 3.691 32.378 283.1 1,412.1 > 65 58.3 2.86 1.82 15.60 0.20 1.00 5.361 3.418 29.273 260.4 1,284.8 > 70 51.1 2.98 1.91 15.93 0.21 1.02 4.893 3.142 26.163 237.7 1,152.6

Indicated > 75 44.2 3.11 2.01 16.20 0.22 1.04 4.421 2.865 23.048 215.2 1,017.0 > 80 38.0 3.25 2.12 16.46 0.23 1.06 3.962 2.592 20.086 193.4 886.7 > 85 32.3 3.39 2.25 16.69 0.24 1.07 3.525 2.332 17.331 173.0 761.7 > 90 27.5 3.54 2.37 16.88 0.25 1.08 3.129 2.095 14.902 154.0 652.4 > 95 23.3 3.70 2.50 17.04 0.27 1.09 2.775 1.878 12.780 136.8 558.6

> 100 19.7 3.86 2.64 17.25 0.28 1.09 2.452 1.679 10.948 121.1 474.3 > 50 19.2 2.62 1.72 22.47 0.21 0.56 1.616 1.060 13.841 86.6 237.2 > 55 16.6 2.78 1.85 23.78 0.21 0.57 1.483 0.985 12.692 76.6 208.6 > 60 14.5 2.92 1.97 24.99 0.21 0.57 1.367 0.920 11.688 68.6 183.0 > 65 12.7 3.08 2.10 26.26 0.22 0.57 1.254 0.855 10.705 61.7 158.1 > 70 10.9 3.25 2.25 27.60 0.23 0.55 1.139 0.788 9.670 54.7 133.1

Inferred > 75 9.1 3.47 2.46 28.48 0.24 0.53 1.013 0.716 8.307 47.5 106.1 > 80 7.6 3.71 2.69 28.92 0.25 0.50 0.904 0.655 7.055 41.5 83.4 > 85 6.4 3.94 2.91 29.77 0.26 0.47 0.814 0.601 6.146 36.4 67.1 > 90 5.4 4.21 3.15 30.82 0.27 0.46 0.733 0.549 5.372 32.0 54.9 > 95 4.8 4.42 3.35 31.48 0.27 0.45 0.678 0.514 4.835 28.9 47.4

> 100 4.3 4.60 3.51 32.28 0.28 0.45 0.636 0.485 4.460 26.6 42.6


ENV_B

ENV_C

ENV_D

HORNE PROJECT

LONGITUDINAL & CROSS SECTION OF THE DEPOSIT


ENV_B

ENV_C

ENV_D

HORNE PROJECT

LONGITUDINAL & CROSS SECTION OF HIGH GRADE ZONES


ENV_B

ENV_C

ENV_D

HORNE PROJECT

HIGH GRADE ZONES AT C$65 NSR

Resource Class Zone

Tonnes (Mt)

AuEq (g/t)

Au (g/t)

Ag (g/t)

Cu (%)

Zn (%)

Contained AuEq (Moz)

Contained Au (Moz)

Contained Ag (Moz)

Contained Cu (Mlbs)

Contained Zn (Mlbs)

ENV_A 36.6 2.59 1.51 15.93 0.17 1.15 3.053 1.780 18.768 141.2 931.5 ENV_B 0.1 2.23 2.13 -- 0.06 0.02 0.010 0.010 -- 0.2 0.1 ENV_C 0.1 2.75 2.65 -- 0.06 0.03 0.011 0.011 -- 0.2 0.1 ENV_D -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Indicated HG_A 6.6 3.12 2.15 15.71 0.12 1.09 0.664 0.458 3.345 18.0 159.2 HG_B 10.9 3.10 2.15 15.48 0.30 0.54 1.083 0.754 5.416 71.9 130.6 HG_C 2.2 3.79 3.17 8.95 0.24 0.28 0.263 0.220 0.621 11.3 13.1 HG_D 1.8 5.48 3.79 21.30 0.46 1.36 0.312 0.216 1.210 18.0 53.1 HG_E 0.4 3.30 2.60 11.82 0.32 0.13 0.047 0.037 0.167 3.1 1.2

ENV_A 11.8 3.10 2.08 27.89 0.23 0.59 1.179 0.789 10.593 59.3 154.6 ENV_B -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --ENV_C -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --ENV_D 0.9 2.70 2.36 4.09 0.12 0.19 0.075 0.066 0.114 2.4 3.6

Inferred HG_A -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --HG_B -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --HG_C -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --HG_D -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --HG_E -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Exchange Rate: CAD/USD = 1.27 , see resource notes in appendix


HORNE PROJECT

HORNE 5 PRELIMINARY ECONOMIC ASSESMENT TEAM

Integrator & Mill Design Integrator for PEA Document Mill Design Economical Model Revision

Geology & Mining Engineering 43-101 Resource Report Block Model Mine Design Mine Operation Opex & Capex

Mine Infrastructures Headframe and Shaft Design UG Ore Handling Design UG Electricity

Geotechnics, Hydrogeology & TMF Geotechnical Review & Tests Hydro-geology Tailings Management Facilities

Environment & Surface Infrastructures Baseline Study and Environmental

Impact Legislation (MDDELCC & ACCE) Community & Social Impact

Luc Lessard, Eng.

Francois Vezina, Eng., MBA, Mine Development – Director, Osisko Mining Group Former Mine Manager Osisko and Agnico-Eagle; Technical Services Manager for Agnico-Eagle (LaRonde II, Pinos Altos, Kittilä)

Christian Laroche, Eng., Processing & Metallurgy – Director, Osisko Mining Group Metallurgical engineer with 15 years experience in plant design, engineering, feasibility, construction and commissioning

http://www.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=https://www.ic.gc.ca/app/ccc/srch/media?estblmntNo%3D123456221325%26graphFileName%3Dfournier.jpg%26applicationCode%3DAP%26lang%3Dfre&imgrefurl=http://www.ic.gc.ca/app/ccc/srch/nvgt.do?lang%3Dfra%26prtl%3D1%26estblmntNo%3D123456221325%26profile%3DcmpltPrfl%26profileId%3D321%26app%3Dsold&h=70&w=300&tbnid=XNhHayUCFFIr4M:&docid=ONPq5VZBNr2zyM&ei=oRtKVoqBHcHw-AGYp5yABw&tbm=isch&ved=0CB4QMygAMABqFQoTCMrV8uDElckCFUE4PgodmBMHcA

http://www.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=https://www.ic.gc.ca/app/ccc/srch/media?estblmntNo%3D123456221325%26graphFileName%3Dfournier.jpg%26applicationCode%3DAP%26lang%3Dfre&imgrefurl=http://www.ic.gc.ca/app/ccc/srch/nvgt.do?lang%3Dfra%26prtl%3D1%26estblmntNo%3D123456221325%26profile%3DcmpltPrfl%26profileId%3D321%26app%3Dsold&h=70&w=300&tbnid=XNhHayUCFFIr4M:&docid=ONPq5VZBNr2zyM&ei=oRtKVoqBHcHw-AGYp5yABw&tbm=isch&ved=0CB4QMygAMABqFQoTCMrV8uDElckCFUE4PgodmBMHcA


HORNE PROJECT

HORNE 5 PEA STATUS & DEADLINES

• Resources model – InnovExplo• Mine planning – InnovExplo• Production and development sequence• Opex and Capex cost• Metallurgical process• Surface infrastructures

COMPLETED

• Data collection • Trade-off mine access • Mine infrastructures• Rock mechanics recommendation• Stope design – Golder• Infrastructures

IN PROGRESS

• ECONOMIC ANALYSIS (Q2)• REPORT (Q2)

EXPECTED


HORNE PROJECT

$100M+ OF EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE


COMPARABLE MINE ANALYSIS

SHAFT ALTERNATIVES

LaRonde (60m)

Westwood (85m)

Existing Shaft Dimension → 6.5m x 4.4m Skip → Loading capacity of 31 000 Kg Hoisting capacity → 10 000 tpd Ore + 2000 tpd Waste Production Hoist → Double Drum 21 feets ~8000hp

Horne 5 (86.5m)


Goldex(Agnico-Eagle)

Young-Davidson(AuRico)

LaRonde(Agnico Eagle)

Horne 5 **(Falco)

Resource Grade (g/t AuEq) 1.8 2.8 5.1 2.9

Mining Method Long hole Transverse long holeLongitudinal Retreat /

Transverse Open Stoping

Transverse long hole **

Depth (m) 800 - 1,500 750 - 1,500 2,000-3,000 600 - 2,300Stope Size 15-38 x 30 x 50 20-25 x 20 x 30 5-25 x 15 x 30 38 x 15 x 15 **Mining Rate 5,100 tpd 8,000 tpd * 7,200 tpd >10,000 tpd **Specific Gravity 2.8 2.69 3.3 3.45Mining Dilution 15% 20% 10%-20% < 4%Operating Cost/NSR $41/t * $53.50/t * $95/t Under review

Annual Production (koz) 71,000 * 200,000 * 230,000 * Under review

* Projected life-of-mine (LOM)** Horne 5 tonnes and grades per 43-101 report; balance is conceptual

Horne 5 $65 NSR Cutoff in Maiden 43-101 Resource Estimate Under Review

Source: Company website and filings

COMPARABLE MINE ANALYSIS

HIGH MARGIN POTENTIAL – HIGHLY MECHANISED


Highly Prospective Land in a Top Jurisdiction

13 former mines on 740 km2 of Falco properties Over 80 years of data archives Great land package with several high potential green and

brown field prospects

LAND PACKAGE

DOMINANT POSITION IN ESTABLISHED CAMP

Balmoral 700 km

Lake Shore Gold 182 km

Niogold 125 km

Eastmain Resources 125 km

Eagle Hill 124 km

St. Andrews Goldfields 120 km

Integra Gold 30 km

Falco Resources 740+ km


Background

Previously Untested

Cu-Zn-Au property, located 25km northwest of Rouyn-Noranda

One of the most significant VMS properties in the Camp

Lithogeochemically similar to Horne Complex rocks

Falco identified near-surface conductors related to stratigraphy with the chemical characteristics of Horne Complex

Over 2km of laterally extensive exhalative sequence, akin to VMS systems

Several Zn-rich anomalies

Consistent with lateral placement to VMS mineralization

Distribution Map of High Probability “Horne Type” Samples

Rimo

Horne Complex

RIVIERE MOUILLEUSE (RIMO)

SIMILAR SIGNATURE TO HORNE


Potential to increase Mineral Resources in the Horne Complex

11 gold targets within the shadow of the old mines Identified potential Horne West extension at depth Targeting 3 zones initially

HORNE 5 PLUS PROGRAM

ADDITIONAL TARGETS IN THE HORNE COMPLEX

2015

2016


Horne West

Au g/t

Horne 5Deposit

HorneMine

Possible Extension


NEAR SURFACE TARGETS – QUEMONT EXTENSIONS

Quemont level plan 200 ±300m 100m

H5-15-08

H5-15-07

2.7 g/t Au, 13.0 g/t Ag, 0.1% Cu, 1.9 % Zn / 55.5m

4.5 g/t Au, 27.1 g/t Ag, 0.3% Cu, 11.9% Zn / 13.15m (non continuous – stope)


Horne West


NEAR SURFACE TARGETS – QUEMONT TARGET AREA

?

QUEMONT PRODUCTION

SHAFT



VALUE GAP – WHERE DOES HORNE 5 FIT?PRE-PRODUCTION ASSETS OVER 5 M OZS & CAPEX BELOW $1BN

Company Country Asset EV Resources EV / Resources CAPEX(name) (US$mm) (mmoz Au) (US$/oz) (US$mm)

Pretium Canada Brucejack $618 20.1 $31 $747TMAC Canada Hope Bay $285 5.9 $48 $175Sabina Canada Back River $81 7.2 $11 $297Kaminak Gold Canada Coffee $84 4.9 $17 $317First Mining Finance Canada Springpole $83 8.1 $10 $438Victoria Canada Eagle $30 6.4 $5 $411Canadian Average $197 $20

Asanko Gold Ghana Asanko $294 9.4 $31 $295Carpathian Gold Romania Rovina Valley $264 9.0 $29 $509Gold Road Australia Yamarna $150 6.1 $25 $286Continental Gold Colombia Buritica $105 9.0 $12 $390True Gold Burkina Faso Karma $75 4.5 $17 $132Belo Sun Brazil Volta Grande $59 6.9 $9 $298Amara Cote d'Ivoire Yaoure $33 9.4 $4 $447Midas Gold USA Stibnite $27 6.5 $4 $970Lydian Armenia Amulsar $19 5.1 $4 $370Orezone Gold Burkina Faso Bombore $16 5.1 $3 $250Exeter Chile Caspiche $13 25.3 $1 $279ROW Average $96 $12

FALCO RESOURCES CANADA HORNE 5 $27 6.6 $4

Note: Companies with market capitalizations below US$10mm or without a CAPEX figure were not included in the analysisNote 2: Projects which are not controlled by producers were included in the analysisSource: BMO Capital Markets, Company filings, Factset, SNL


CORPORATE TIMELINE – ON THE ROAD TO FEASIBILITY

First Half of 2017

• Full Feasibility Study

•Construction Decision

2016

• Initiate dewatering program

•Access to Underground

2nd

Quarter 2016

• Initial PreliminaryEconomicAssessment

•QuemontExtension & RIMO follow-ups

November2015 -

January 2016

•Metallurgy Results

•New 43-101 Resource Estimate

Summer & Fall 2015

•5,000 meter program on RIMO

•7,800 meter program on Horne 5 plus

•Metallurgy•Hydrology•Geotechnical•Environment•Engage with

community and all stakeholders

January to October

2015

•17,150 meters Confirmatory Drilling Program


Sean Roosen, Chairman Chairman & CEO of Osisko Royalties

Mario Caron, Lead Director Mining executive with over 35 years of experience in

the mining industry

Luc Lessard, President & CEO, Director Former COO of Canadian Malartic Partnership Former COO and Senior Vice-President of Engineering

& Construction for Osisko Mining Former VPt of Engineering & Construction for Iamgold Former Executive Director of Engineering &

Construction for Cambior

Helene Cartier, Director Former VP Environment and Sustainable

Development at Osisko Mining Corporation

Jim Davidson, Director Co-Founder of Falco Resources Former CFO of Western Minerals Group

Claude Ferron, Director Former COO of Xstrata Copper Canada

Paul Henri-Girard, Director Former VP of Canadian Operations at Agnico Eagle

Luc Lessard, President & CEO, Director

Vincent Metcalfe, CFO Former mining investment banker

Claude Bernier, Exploration Manager Over 40 years of experience on various exploration projects

Claude Léveillée, Vice-President Community Relations & Human Resources Former Corporate Director, Human Resources/Organizational

Development at Agnico Eagle Mines

SENIOR LEADERSHIP TEAM

Board of Directors Officers


Head Office Falco Resources Ltd.1100, avenue des Canadiens-de-MontréalBureau 300Montréal, QC H3B 2S2Tél. : +1.514.905.3162Toll Free : +1.888.915.2009Courriel : [email protected]

Investor InquiriesVincent Metcalfe, CFOTel: +1.514.905.3162Email: [email protected]

CONTACT US


APPENDIX


17,150m surface drill program 9 holes, 9 wedge holes Metallurgical testing Updated NI 43-101

Primary objectives of confirmation drilling: Upgrade resource category from Inferred to

Indicated Confirm metallurgical parameters (improve

payability) Confirm and increase level of data with

regards to specific gravity Confirm historic silver grades of >15 g/t

N S

HORNE PROJECT – COMPLETED IN 2015

CONFIRMATORY DRILL PROGRAM – HORNE 52300m


HORNE PROJECT– COMPLETED IN 2015

CONFIRMATORY DRILL PROGRAM – RESULTS

(0$NSR) 2015 Confirmation Drilling Results (Weighted average)

Hole_IDFrom(m)

To(m)

Length(m)

Au(g/t)

Ag(g/t)

Cu(%)

Zn(%)

Au_Eq_With Silver(g/t)

Au_Eq_Without

Silver(g/t)

Au(g/t)

Ag(g/t)

Cu(%)

Zn(%)

Au_Eq_Without

Silver(g/t)

2015 vs 2014

% H5-15-01 1,110 1,141 31.2 2.03 10.16 0.46 0.04 3.00 2.85 2.26 0.30 0.10 2.82 0.9%H5-15-01-Atw 1,105 1,142 36.7 0.88 4.51 0.27 0.06 1.45 1.38 2.18 0.35 0.12 2.85 (51.5%)H5-15-02 1,001 1,102 100.9 1.32 29.46 0.11 1.94 2.93 2.48 1.14 0.11 1.19 1.92 29.4%H5-15-02-Atw 1,002 1,089 87.0 1.43 28.61 0.13 1.47 2.82 2.39 1.25 0.12 1.41 2.16 10.6%H5-15-03B 1,248 1,365 116.7 0.50 15.51 0.06 1.00 1.34 1.11 0.79 0.06 0.67 1.23 (9.7%)H5-15-03Dtw 1,255 1,390 134.4 0.55 15.44 0.08 1.10 1.46 1.23 0.82 0.06 0.70 1.28 (3.7%)H5-15-04 1,302 1,327 25.5 0.73 10.27 0.13 0.71 1.45 1.30 0.81 0.11 1.11 1.55 (16.3%)H5-15-04-Atw 1,290 1,320 30.3 0.95 11.05 0.14 1.79 2.26 2.09 0.83 0.12 1.13 1.61 30.1%H5-15-06 1,189 1,243 54.5 1.36 16.16 0.26 0.73 2.43 2.19 1.84 0.29 0.31 2.50 (12.6%)H5-15-06-Atw 1,189 1,247 57.5 1.72 22.50 0.32 0.99 3.11 2.77 1.89 0.28 0.28 2.51 10.2%H5-15-05 1,803 1,896 92.6 1.96 16.14 0.12 0.57 2.71 2.47 2.31 16.08 0.13 0.53 2.81 (12.1%)H5-15-05-Atw 1,800 1,853 53.0 2.49 15.17 0.14 0.70 3.30 3.08 2.16 11.71 0.11 0.40 2.56 20.4%H5-15-08 1,441 1,550 108.9 2.20 14.16 0.30 0.32 3.10 2.88 1.88 0.24 0.39 2.49 16.0%H5-15-08W 1,443 1,550 107.1 2.00 13.13 0.27 0.53 2.93 2.73 1.90 0.26 0.28 2.49 9.7%H5-15-07-A 1,958 1,986 28.0 0.41 17.32 0.10 1.86 1.77 1.51 0.91 0.38 0.13 1.63 (6.8%)H5-15-07-Btw 1,956 1,986 30.0 0.52 18.21 0.12 1.39 1.70 1.42 0.96 0.35 0.13 1.65 (13.6%)H5-15-09-A 1,178 1,223 45.1 1.98 32.57 0.25 1.06 3.43 2.94 1.31 0.17 1.10 2.15 36.9%H5-15-09-Btw 1,177 1,221 43.7 1.38 24.85 0.16 1.06 2.57 2.20 1.22 0.15 1.13 2.05 7.0%

Total 1183.1 1.40 18.12 0.18 0.95 2.45 2.18 1.46 14.49 0.17 0.65 2.09 4.3%

Weighted Average of 2014 Raw Assays within a 15 m radius cylinder around DDH


HORNE PROJECT – COMPLETED IN 2015

CONFIRMATORY DRILL PROGRAM – HORNE 5

H5 Lo

ngitu

dinal

view

Look

ing N

orth

1 800m

1 200m

600m

1 800m

1 200m

600m

H5-15-03B, 03Dtw

H5-15-01, 01Atw

H5-15-08, 8Atw

H5-15-02, 02Atw

H5-15-09A, 09Btw

ENV-A

ENV-D

H5-15-06, 06Atw

H5-15-07A,07Btw

H5-15-05, 05Atw (nc)

H5-15-04, 04Atw

1 800m

1 200m

600m

ENV-A

HG-B

HG-D

HG-C

HG-E

ENV-B

ENV-D

H5-15-03B, 03Dtw

H5-15-01, 01Atw

H5-15-08, 8Atw

H5-15-06, 06Atw

H5-15-07A,07Btw

H5-15-05, 05Atw (nc)

H5-15-04, 04Atw

HG-A

H5-15-02, 02Atw

H5-15-09A, 09Btw

33


1110.4m

Mineralized Zones Hole H5-15-01

HORNE PROJECT

2015 DRILL PROGRAM – HORNE 5


HORNE PROJECT

Mineral Resource Estimate – Resource NotesResource Estimate Notes:1. The effective date of the resource estimate is January 8, 2016. The Independent and Qualified Persons for the Mineral Resource Estimate as required by National Instrument 43-101 are Carl Pelletier, B.Sc., P.Geo. and Vincent Jourdain, P.Eng., Ph.D., both employees of InnovExplo Inc.2. Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and have not demonstrated economic viability. 3. While the results are presented undiluted and in situ, the reported mineral resources are considered by the Qualified Persons to have reasonable prospects for economic extraction. 4. These estimates include four (4) low grade gold-bearing mineralized zones.5. The principal low-grade gold-bearing mineralized zone includes five (5) high-grade gold-bearing zones, one (1) high-grade copper-bearing zone, one (1) high-grade zinc-bearing zone and two (2) high-grade silver-bearing zones.6. Resources were compiled at NSR cut-offs of C$50, C$55, C$60, C$65, C$70, C$75, C$80, C$85, C$90, C$95 and C$100 per tonne. The official base case resource is reported at a C$65 per tonne NSR cut-off. 7. The appropriate NSR cut-off will vary depending on prevailing economic and operational parameters to be determined.8. NSR estimates are based on the following assumptions: exchange rate of $C1.27/$US, metal prices of (all $US): gold $1,165/oz, silver $15.77, copper $2.53/lb, zinc $0.89/lb (One-year trailing average as of December 14, 2015). Net recoveries of 84.0% for gold, 75.3% for silver, 71.8% for zinc and 66.5% for copper. Smelting cost (including transportation) C$7.73 per tonne.9. Gold equivalent calculations assume these same metal prices.10. Inferred resources are separate from Indicated Resources11. The quantity and grade of reported Inferred Resources in this estimate are uncertain in nature and there has not been sufficient work to define these Inferred Resources as Indicated or Measured Resources. It is uncertain if further work will result in upgrading them to an Indicated or Measured mineral resource category.

Resource Modeling Notes:12. Densities within ENV_A were estimated from Noranda drill hole iron assay data and Falco density data using a 3-pass ID2 interpolation method. Limited density data was available for zones ENV_B to D and a fixed density of 2.88 t/m3 was assumed for these zones which represent the median of the available data. 13. Compositing was done on drill hole sections falling within the mineralized zones (composite = 3.0 metres). 14. The resource was estimated using Geovia GEMS 6.7. The estimate is based on 4,411 diamond drill holes (323,087 m). For silver the estimates also uses the results of an exhaustive metallurgical test comprising 2,112 diamond drill holes assayed for silver over a total length of 75,540 meters. A minimum true thickness of 7.0 m was applied, using the grade of the adjacent material when assayed, or a value of zero when not assayed.15. Only the silver interpolation in the Inferred resources does not use the material when not assayed.16. The estimate was based on a three dimensional block model (5x5x5 metre blocks). Within ENV_A. Wireframes of high grade zones were used as hard boundaries to constrain the interpolation of gold, silver, copper, zinc and density into the block model. Interpolation parameters were derived based on geostatistical analysis conducted on 3 metre composited drill hole data. Block grades have been estimated using Inverse Distance Squared (ID2) interpolation method and the mineral resources have been classified based on proximity to sample data and the continuity of mineralization in accordance with CIM best practices. 17. Capping of high grade gold values was done on raw assay data and established on a per zone basis: HG_A: 35 g/t, HG_B: 35g/t, HG_C: 25g/t, HG_D: 35g/t, HG_E: 25g/t, ENV_A: 35g/t, ENV_B: 25g/t, ENV_C: 25g/t, ENV_D: 25g/t and for high grade silver SG_HG:100g/t, HG_D: 165 g/t, ENV_A_SG_Low: 110 g/t, ENV_B: 100 g/t, ENV_C: 100 g/t, ENV_D: 100 g/t. No upper capping was applied to copper and zinc data. 18. Tonnage estimates were rounded to the nearest hundred tonnes. Any discrepancies in the totals are due to rounding effects. Rounding practice follows the recommendations set out in Form 43-101F1. 19. CIM definitions and guidelines were followed in estimating mineral resources. 20. InnovExplo is not aware of any known environmental, permitting, legal, title-related, taxation, socio-political, marketing or other relevant issue that could materially affect the mineral resource estimate. 21. The mineral resources presented herein are categorized as Indicated and Inferred based on geological and grade continuity. A maximum distance to the closest composite of 25 meters was used for indicated Resources. The average distance to the nearest composite is 8.3 meters for the Indicated resources and 35.2 meters for the Inferred resources.22. Metal contained in ounces (troy) = metric tonnes x grade / 31.10348. Calculations used metric units (metres, tonnes and g/t). Metal contents are presented in ounces and pounds.

february 2016 corporate presentation

Business