federal building

Upload: sammuel-go-go

Post on 03-Jun-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 Federal Building

    1/18

    SAN FRANCISCO FEDERAL BUILDINGMORPHOSIS

    BUILDING CASE STUDY

    MICHAEL CHUEVDA 621

  • 8/12/2019 Federal Building

    2/18

    BUILDING CASE STUDY: MORPHOSIS SAN FRANCISCO F EDERAL BUILDING

  • 8/12/2019 Federal Building

    3/18

    1

    GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION:Program: Of ceLocation: San Francisco, CaliforniaArchitect: MorphosisSite Area: 2.1 acres/0.8 hectaresBuilding Area: 605,000 sq ft (56, 205 sq m)Number of Storeys: 18 storey of ce towerBuilding Height: 234 ft (71.3 m)Construction: 2003 - 2007

    CONTEXTThe San Francisco Federal Building is situated on a site inSan Francisco, Californias South of Market (SoMa) District.It is situated on a block that is turned 45 degrees off thenorth-south axis which gives it a unique and challenging

    condition, environmentally. San Francisco is located in ahighly active seismic zone which adds additional challengesand possibilities to the project .

    FORMThe Federal Building is comprised of three major forms onsite. At the northwest edge of the site is an eighteen-storeytower. To meet the scale of the public, a four-storey annexextends along the southwest. The remainder of the sitecontains an open plaza with a free standing pavilion at the

    east corner that provides interaction with the street levelactivities (morphmedia).

    The form of the building has an interesting relationship to thesurrounding context of its location. Immediately northeastof the site is the Beaux-Arts style Court of Appeals. To thesoutheast and along Mission Street, this style of architecturecan be seen again to a lesser scale. Rudolph states that [a]truly successful building must be related to its neighbors interms of scale, proportions and the space created betweenthe buildings (213). Morphosis develops this relationship

  • 8/12/2019 Federal Building

    4/18

    2 BUILDING CASE STUDY: MORPHOSIS SAN FRANCISCO F EDERAL BUILDING

    FIGURE A.2

    in the form of juxtaposition where the height surpassesthat of the surrounding neighborhood yet meets the streetand pedestrians at an appropriate scale with the four-storeyannex along the southwest edge of the site, the detachedcafeteria at the east corner and with the plaza between allbuilding compositions. The stainless steel skin provides thiscontradiction to the surrounding formal and repetitive forms.The skin of the Federal Building also contrasts the logicallayout of the structural form of the tower it is wrapping addinggreater interest to its form ( gure A.2).

    The tower is visible from many vantage points around thecity as it penetrates San Franciscos skyline. There are twofaces to the Federal Buildings tower: to the north, the toweris inconspicuous revealing its structural form while beingarticulating its faade with the vertical glazing screens to wardoff summer solar gain; to the south, a stainless steel veil drapesitself poetically over the tower face and the plaza below. The

    site revealed a dividing line in the city and the expressioncouldnt reinforce this any less. To the north, the languageof the north faade speaks to the skyline of the borderingdistrict as it has a typical geometric appearance. Its placementis like a border marking for the area stating a limit to wheretowering skylines are not to proceed beyond. ( gure A.3) Thesouth contrasts the north in form by speaking largely to theindustrial areas near San Francisco Bay. The elevation is morerugged and less formal as compared to its north face. This playon two differing cultures within the city on the face of onetower displays a sensitivity to the social environment in whichit has been placed.

    FIGURE A.3.

  • 8/12/2019 Federal Building

    5/18

    3

    The primary focus of the design was performance basedwhich would have an impact on the urban scale as well asthe internal re-workings of the traditional of ce building.As a mandate, the US government required this buildingto be a model of ce building (Lerum, 215) which led thedesign team to develop the project around three majorgoals: sustainability; rede ning of ce culture to increaseheath, ef ciency and creativity; and an urban landmarkthat engages with the community (morphmedia).

    Sustainability and responsible energy management werethe major drivers in many of the design decisions forthe Federal Building. Not only did it inform decisionson systems but equally did it in uence the form of thebuilding. Rudolphs third determinant (213) is re ectedas great consideration was taken in the regionsenvironmental surroundings and in uences (i.e. weather).It is understood that a thinner oor plate allows for

    ef cient transmission of natural air ows through theentirety of the space ( gure A.2). As a oor plate growsin depth, the ef ciency of ows is greatly reduced ( gureA.3). Not only is air ow affected by the shape of the oorplate, but this shape also effects light permeability as well.With the Federal Buildings oor to ceiling glazing, sunlight is able to travel through the open of ce layout fromone end to the other ( gure A.2). The deeper the oorplate, the less light is able to travel through the entirearea ( gure A.3).

    CONCEPTUAL SKETCH (morphmedia) FIGURE A.6 - BUILDING BODY FIGURE A.7 - BUILDING SKIN

    The structural moves in the building are expressed in a very honest way and astraightforward way... [w]e are interested in a kind of realness - Morphosis - (Lerum, 216)

  • 8/12/2019 Federal Building

    6/18

    4 BUILDING CASE STUDY: MORPHOSIS SAN FRANCISCO F EDERAL BUILDING

    BODY:As a major element, the stainless steel screen is of greatinterest to examine. Its organization is akin to the SanAndreas fault as it could have simply been draped as a at,inconspicuous form. Instead there appears to be a similarityin its layout to this formation in nature ( gure b.1 & B.2).The idea of transparency in a time of heightened terrorismis contrasting to what one would be instinctual. Thiscontradiction was an attempt to provide a sense of opennessof the government to the city and its patrons as opposed toa secretive closed off knee-jerk reaction to security risks.

    FIGURE B.1 - VERTICAL SECTIONOVERLAID OVER FAULT LINE

    FIGURE B.3 - TECTONIC SLIP IN FACADE

    FIGURE B.2 - VERTICAL SECTIONOVERLAID OVER FAULT FORMATION

    FIGURE B.4 - FAULT TYPES

  • 8/12/2019 Federal Building

    7/18

    5

    As Thom Mayne describes it, the screen acts like clothing providing protection from the elements(Blum). The 50% porous stainless steel screen acts to protect the oor to ceiling glazed of ces fromexcessive heat gain from its southern exposure. The screen is computer controlled that opens andcloses based on climate conditions ( gure B.7 & B.8). Similar to skin, the building is able to regulateitself by perspiring if needed by opening pockets in the screen ( gure B.5). The screens are openedto allow air ow from the opposite end of the oor plate to exit without hindrance. The building canalso insulate itself by closing the screen and maintaining an air pocket between it and the buildingface similar to hair rising over skin to do the same ( gure B.6).

    FIGURE B.5 - SKIN AND MOISTURE DIAGRAM

    FIGURE B.6 - SCREEN DIAPHRAM FIGURE B.8 - PARTIALLY OPEN SCREEN

    FIGURE B.7 - AIRFLOW THROUG HOPEN SCREEN

  • 8/12/2019 Federal Building

    8/18

    6 BUILDING CASE STUDY: MORPHOSIS SAN FRANCISCO F EDERAL BUILDING

    When discussing terrorism and US government, one cannot helpbut conjure up imagery commonly associated with said subjects.Veiling is another term for screening that can be used. The ideaof a woman veiled behind a burka ( gure B.9) can be projectedonto the Federal Building portraying an assertive control overthe building similar to the idea of a burkas perceived controland power over a woman. As transparent as the screen wouldseem, there is still an element of oppression conveyed. Thecontradictions in forms also express themselves in a subsurfacelayer.

    The veils primary role is to restrict the viewers ability toobserve the true subject beneath this layer. Though it does this

    job successfully, the stainless steel screen hides a level of powerbeing expressed. Although you cannot see the gure behind theveil, the individual, however, can observe you. Foucault s tates, Thepanoptica schema makes any apparatus of power more intense(Nealon, 34). The idea of the panopticon, as theorized by Jeremy

    Bentham, was the idea of a watchman able to observe a subject(a prison inmate in Benthams case) without the subject beingable to perceive it. In this case, government workers are able tosurvey the landscape unbeknownst to those outside hence frombehind the veil. The form of the light box/sky cafe penetratingthe screen is reminiscent of an eye; it is always watching andobserving the city proper ( gure B.10).

    FIGURE B.10 - PANOPTIC SCHEMA

    FIGURE B.9 - WOMAN BEHIND BURKA

    I have opportunities to make certain kinds of contributionsbecause of the magnitude of the work, of the nature of theprogram, or its position in the city. The work has become explicitlypolitical - Thom Mayne - (Fletcher, 66)

  • 8/12/2019 Federal Building

    9/18

    7

    TECHNIQUE:The San Francisco Federal Building handles natural weather patternsto achieve independence from energy-reliant methods typical of manygovernment buildings. The building utilizes its orientation to the environmentin a way that takes advantage of natural occurring systems that aid in theheating and cooling of the interior spaces. The Federal Building is the rstUS federal building to be constructed without a mechanical air conditioning

    system (Lerum). It relies entirely on natural wind and cross air ows acrossits shallow oor plate as it is oriented to predominant winds from thenorthwest.

    The different permutations of its current form on the site yield conditionsthat make its decided orientation the most ideal. Full utilization of the site iscritical for any building. By realigning to the north-south axis off the existingcity grid, the site becomes disjointed and disconnected. A full 180 degreereorientation refocuses the site to a less active street thus completelyclosing the site off from the major pedestrian traf c. Each of the 90 degreerotations provide openness in the site, but do not reinforce the idea of it

    being a border marker between the low-rise and high-rise districts. Thisorientation does not allow for natural ventilation capturing predominantwinds critical to the energy saving schemes sought by the government andarchitect.

    FIGURE C.1 - REORIENTATION STUDIES

  • 8/12/2019 Federal Building

    10/18

    8 BUILDING CASE STUDY: MORPHOSIS SAN FRANCISCO F EDERAL BUILDING

    Winter Solstice: 13:00 HR

    Winter Solstice: 14:00 HR

    Winter Solstice: 15:00 HR

    Winter Solstice: 16:00 HRAs the building and site are oriented 45degrees to north, the northwest faceexperiences low solar angles during summermonths which leads to extreme heat gain(Lerum). To mitigate this issue, a Brise-SoleilSystem of sun shading employs vertical glasspanels (Morphosis, 367) that is installed onthis elevation for the entire vertical face ofthe building to act as sun shades. The glassruns vertically rather than horizontally as thesun is at a low angle in the later afternoon.Summer Solstice: 18:00 HR

    Summer Solstice: 13:00 HR

    Summer Solstice: 14:00 HR

    Summer Solstice: 15:00 HR

    Summer Solstice: 16:00 HR

    Summer Solstice: 17:00 HR

    FIGURE C.2 - BRISE-SOLEL SHADING STUDIES

  • 8/12/2019 Federal Building

    11/18

    9

    The southeast face of the building, however, is hit directly with the full heat of themajority of the day. The main body of the building is oor to ceiling glass which wouldallow too much heat gain with direct exposure. Morphosis utilizes a 58% permeable(Lerum) stainless steel screen offset from this building face. The permeability of thescreen does not [compromise] the view or the amount of daylight entering thespace (Lerum, 226) without compromising thermal comfort within the interiorspaces. Vision through a perforated screen depends on the variation of the opening sizes( gure). In comparing different opening sizes, there is a ne balance betweenthree key determining factors: ventilation, solar gain, maximum views. With thesmallest opening, solar gain is mitigated but ventilation and views are compromised.As openings get larger, all the factors begin to meet in mutual favor to the other.Larger openings beyond the 58% would have allowed too much solar gain and anypercentage above 60 or 62 will cause the material to begin to deform during theprocess of punching the sheets so that they become very unworkable to fabricate(Lerum 226).

    100% VIEW

    FIGURE C.3 - STAINLESS STEEL SCRIM OPENING VARIATIONS

    58% OPENING

    46% OPENING

    36% OPENING

    25% OPENING

    13% OPENING

  • 8/12/2019 Federal Building

    12/18

    10 BUILDING CASE STUDY: MORPHOSIS SAN FRANCISCO F EDERAL BUILDING

    without an active sidewalk life, without the frequent, serendipitous interactions of many people, there is nopublic acquaintanceship, no foundation of public trust, no cross connections with the necessary people and nopractice or ease in applying the most ordinary techniques of public life at lowly levels. - Malcolm Gladwell on Jane Jacobs The Death and Life of Great American Cities - (Morphmedia)

    SPACE:The internal logic of the Federal Building is primarily hinged upon improved co-workerrelationships and improved health of its users. For the former point, the idea of improvingsocial conditions by means of architecture is revealed in Morphosis organizing of the verticalaccess to each level. This employs what Morphosis describes as a Jacobsian sidewalk life ofcross sectional interactions (Morphmedia). Malcolm Gladwell also notes that one study

    after another has demonstrated [that] the best ideas in any workplace arise out of casualcontact among different groups within the same company (Morphmedia). The elevatoraccesses every other level which is called Skip-Stop Circulation. By stopping only on everyother level, the user is required to access the oor above or below by means of anothercirculation method such as a set of single storey stairs. With the intentional programming ofthe space of different departments within these mixing-zones, there becomes an increasedchance of these casual contacts as Gladwell suggests.

    FIGURE D.1 - SKIP-STOP CIRCULATION

  • 8/12/2019 Federal Building

    13/18

    11

    The latter of the above identi es a growing concern in North America that deals primarilywith health of workers. The increase in sedentary work habits and conveniences oftechnology has helped contribute to the detrimental health issues being faced by thepresent day workforce. The idea of the Skip-Stop Circulation was to change the socialnorm of convenience and ease to that of increased physical activity but not beyondwhat is capable of anyones abilities. a single storey climb or descent. In Violence ofArchitecture, Bernard Tschumi notes that architectural spaces also violate bodies withinit through the symbolic or physical violence of buildings on users (Tschumi, 44). Bycreating this condition of forced increase in physical movement, there is a possibility ofworker dissatisfaction. However, the physical and social bene ts were seen to outweighany risk of this occurring.

    FIGURE D.2 - SKIP-STOP CIRCULATION

  • 8/12/2019 Federal Building

    14/18

    12 BUILDING CASE STUDY: MORPHOSIS SAN FRANCISCO F EDERAL BUILDING

    There are two different sensations produced by the materiality and scale of the exterior andinterior of the building. Beginning with the exterior, much has been discussed of its materialityin the previous Form and Body sections. As previously stated, the exterior has a duality toits formulation of presence to the north and south. But in discussing the sensations of thesefacades, the south induces a curiosity. As government security - or secrecy becomes moreof a fascination for people to look beyond and into, so the stainless steel scrim producesthis intrigue. As discussed in the Body portion, the body beyond the burka is something of amystery. Its general form is understood but beyond is something left to the imagination. Theinternal workings and space are not for the general public to be intimate with but only tothose privileged to see it in its natural form.

    BURKA WOMAN CONCEALING CONCEALING

    A BAG A WEAPON

    FIGURE D.3 - BODY HIDDEN

  • 8/12/2019 Federal Building

    15/18

    13

    The internal spaces offer a unique sensory experience that differs in locations through themore public areas in comparison to the more private locations of the agency work areas.The major public areas are composed such that a patron is not to linger or get comfortablewithin the space. As it is a government building, it is meant purely to provide only the serviceone came for and nothing further; it is not a social gathering area where prolonged periods ofgathering are supported. This is suggested in the cold material palette of the space. Durabilitywas a primary driver for selection of interior nishes. The bre cement board offers avarying texture to the concrete throughout yet maintains the same quality of stark, cleanand authoritative ef ciency as a government body is seen. The scale of the panel sizes alsoexpresses an odd discomfort as the larger the panels, the less human they feel.

    ORIGINAL HALF SIZE ONE THIRD SIZE

    FIGURE D.4 -PANEL VARIATIONS

  • 8/12/2019 Federal Building

    16/18

    14 BUILDING CASE STUDY: MORPHOSIS SAN FRANCISCO F EDERAL BUILDING

    The scale of the interior volumes also reinforces this. As lower ceilings andvolumes typically express an intimacy and comfort of a space , the San FranciscoFederal Buildings interior conveys the opposite. As the scale of the spaceincreases, so does the discomfort in being in this space; as the ceiling rises,agitation increases and moves you along your way. As Tschumi describes it, thisis a space clearly acting upon its user in an intense way.

    However, when a user reaches the work areas, the comfort level of being inthat space increases. Through the use of natural light and lower ceilings, thespace allows the user to operate without feeling discomfort as experienced inthe larger volumes.

    FIGURE D.5 - SENSATION THROUGH VERTICAL SPACE VIEW UP THROUGH PUBLIC LOBBY

  • 8/12/2019 Federal Building

    17/18

    15

    REFERENCES:Attman, Osman. Green Architecture: Advanced Technologies and Materials. Washington, DC: McGraw Hill Companies, Inc, 2010. Print.Blum, Andrew. Interview with Thom Mayne. Street Cred San Francisco: Architecture and the Pedestrian Experience. n.d. Web 11 Sept. 2012.< http://vimeo.com/304541#>.Lerum, Vidar. High Performance Building. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2008. Print.Fletcher, Mark. Architect: The Work of the Pritzker Prize Laureates in Their Own Words. New York, NY: Black Dog & Leventhal Publishers. 2010. Print.Murray, Scott. Contemporary Curtain Wall Architecture. New York, NY: Princeton Architectural Press. 2009. Print.Nealon, J. Once More, With Intensity: Foucaults History of Power Revisited, Foucault Beyond Foucault, Stanford University Press. (24-53) 2008. Print.Ouroussoff, Nicolai. More Openness in Government (Of ces, That Is). Architectural Review and The New York Times, 14 March 2007. Web. 20 Oct. 2012..Puglisi, Luigi Prestinenza. New Directions in Contemporary Architecture. West Sussex P019 8SQ, England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2008. Print.Rudolph, Paul. The Six Determinants of Architectural Form. Theories and Manifestoes of Contemporary Architecture. (213-215). n.p. n.d.. Print.Tschumi, Bernard. Violence of Architecture, Art Forum, Vol XX (1). (44-47). n.p.1981, PrintTyrer, Emily. A Complex Modernity: Morphosis San Francisco Federal Building(April, 2010). PDF le.

    IMAGES:Cover: morphmedia. . Web.Figure A.1: Composite Image. google maps (background image), diagram (self).FIgure A.2: Composite Image. morphmedia. . Web. diagram (self).Figure A.3: Composite Image. morphmedia. . Web. diagram (self).

    Images below text: morphmedia. . Web.Figure A.4: Composite Image. morphmedia. . Web. diagram (self).Figure A.5: diagram (self).Figure A.6: Composite Image. morphmedia. . Web. diagram (self).Figure A.7: Composite Image. morphmedia. . Web. diagram (self).

    Conceptual Sketch: morphmedia. . Web.Figure B.1: Composite Image. . morphmedia. . Web. diagram (self).Figure B.2: Composite Image. . morphmedia. . Web. diagram

    (self).Figure B.3: Composite Image. . morphmedia. . Web. diagram (self).Figure B.4: . Web.Figure B.5: . Web.Figure B.6: Composite Image. morphmedia. . Web. diagram (self).Figure B.7: Composite Image. morphmedia. . Web. diagram (self).Figure B.8: Composite Image. morphmedia. . Web. diagram (self).Figure B.9: . Web.Figure B.10: Composite Image. . morphmedia. . Web. diagram

    (self).Figure C.1: diagram (self).

    Images below text: morphmedia. . Web.

  • 8/12/2019 Federal Building

    18/18

    16 BUILDING CASE STUDY: MORPHOSIS SAN FRANCISCO F EDERAL BUILDING

    Figure C.2: diagram (self). Images below text: morphmedia. . Web.

    Figure C.3: Composite Image. morphmedia. . Web. diagram (self). Images below text: morphmedia. . Web.

    Figure D.1: Composite Image. morphmedia. . Web. diagram (self).Figure D.2: . Web.Figure D.3: diagram (self).

    Images below text: morphmedia. . Web.Figure D.4: Composite Image. morphmedia. . Web. diagram (self).

    Images below text: morphmedia. . Web.Figure D.5: Composite Image. morphmedia. . Web. diagram (self).

    Images below text: morphmedia. . Web.