feed-in tariffs · paradox of feed-in tariffs need for change resistance to change efficacy demand...

38

Upload: others

Post on 11-Oct-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …
Page 2: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …

Feed-in Tariffs in TurmoilLincoln DaviesUniversity of Utah

Page 3: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …
Page 4: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …
Page 5: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …
Page 6: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …
Page 7: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …
Page 8: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …

RoadmapFITs, defined

FITs > RPSs?

Germany, e.g.

Lessons and Implications

Page 9: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …

FIT =

Purchase Obligation+

Incentive Price+

Interconnection Mandate

Page 10: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …

Source: Haas et al., 15 Renewable & Sustainable Energy Rev. 1003 (2011)

Policy Efficacy: FITs v. RPSs (1990-2001)

Page 11: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …

Source: Haas et al., 15 Renewable & Sustainable Energy Rev. 1003 (2011)

Policy Efficacy: FITs v. RPSs (1998-2005)

Page 12: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …

Source: Burer & Wustenhagen, 37 Energy Policy 4997 (2009)

Page 13: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …

Source: Sovacool, 35 Energy 1779 (2010)

Page 14: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …

Germany: A Bit of HistoryStromeinspeisegesetz (1990) (“StrEG”)

Utilities must connect renewable generators

Buy renewable energy output

Fixed rates from 65-90% retail tariff

Erneuerbare-Energie-Gesetz (2000) (“EEG”)

Higher tariffs

Longer payout terms

Resource-based prices

Page 15: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …

EEG StructureGuaranteed purchase

Guaranteed grid connection

Fixed, resource-based price

For a 20-year term

Page 16: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …

Energiewende35% of produced electricity by 2020

50% by 2030

65% by 2040

80% by 2050

Page 17: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …
Page 18: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …
Page 19: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …
Page 20: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …
Page 21: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …
Page 22: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …
Page 23: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …
Page 24: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …

Renewable Energy Deployment

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

TWh

GW

Wasser Wind Onshore Wind Offshore Biomasse Fotovoltaik Geothermie EE-Erzeugung

Page 25: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …
Page 26: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …

1990 StrEG

2000 EEG

2004Amdts

2009Amdts

2010Amdts

2011Amdts

2012Amdts

2014Overhaul

(“EEG 2.0”?)

Page 27: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …

EEG Evolution – Some WrinklesQuadrennial revision

Annual solar degression

Solar breathing cap (atmender Deckel)

Market premium option

EEG surcharge (umlage)

Difference between

EEG tariff rate and

Wholesale market price

Spread over utility customers, but

Large industries exempted

Page 28: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …

Solar PV TariffsFacility 2009 2010 July

2010Oct. 2010 2011 2012

Up to 30 kW 43.01 39.14 34.05 33.03 28.74 24.43

Up to 100 kW 40.91 37.23 32.39 31.42 27.33 23.23

Up to 1 MW 39.58 35.23 30.65 29.73 25.86 21.98

Over 1 MW 33.00 29.37 25.55 24.79 21.56 18.33

Freestanding 31.94 28.43 25.02 24.26 21.11 17.94

Page 29: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …

Solar PV Tariffs

Page 30: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …

Degression

Page 31: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …

Market Spot Prices

Spot Price Curve 12.05.2005 Max.16.500 MW Solar

Spot Price Curve 10.05.2012

Page 32: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …
Page 33: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …

EEG Umlage

1.02

1.161.31

2.05

5.74

6.75

7.39

8.37

0.88

3.53 3.59

5.28

4.895.51

5.866.43

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

9.00

ct/kWh

Oberes-Szenario Unteres-Szenario Ist

Page 34: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …
Page 35: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …
Page 36: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …
Page 37: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …

Lessons and ImplicationsParadox of feed-in tariffs

Need for change

Resistance to change

Efficacy

Demand for internal policy design change

Cost management

Equity

Market participation

External effects

Balancing flexibility and stability

Page 38: Feed-in Tariffs · Paradox of feed-in tariffs Need for change Resistance to change Efficacy Demand for internal policy design change Cost management Equity Market participation …