feedback on nanosecond timescales (font): philip burrows
DESCRIPTION
IP Feedback. Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University. Outline. Reminder of CLIC IPFB prototype Remarks on L* ATF2 IP FB concept - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5681570d550346895dc4ae51/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT):
Philip Burrows
Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry
John Adams Institute
Oxford University
IP Feedback
![Page 2: Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5681570d550346895dc4ae51/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Outline
• Reminder of CLIC IPFB prototype
• Remarks on L*
• ATF2 IP FB concept
• Results of recent beam runs
![Page 3: Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5681570d550346895dc4ae51/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
IP beam feedback concept
Last line of defence against relative beam misalignment
Measure vertical position of outgoing beam and hence beam-beam kick angle
Use fast amplifier and kicker to correct vertical position of beam incoming to IR
FONT – Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales
![Page 4: Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5681570d550346895dc4ae51/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
CLIC Final Doublet Region
4
![Page 5: Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5681570d550346895dc4ae51/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
CLIC Final Doublet Region
5
![Page 6: Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5681570d550346895dc4ae51/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
CLIC Final Doublet Region
6
![Page 7: Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5681570d550346895dc4ae51/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Comments on L*
• Current geometry:
time of flight IP BPM kicker IP ~ 24 ns
• Demonstrated FONT3 electronics latency = 13ns
• Estimated IPFB latency = 37ns
![Page 8: Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5681570d550346895dc4ae51/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
CLIC IP FB performance
Single random seed of GM C
Resta Lopez
![Page 9: Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5681570d550346895dc4ae51/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
For noisy sites:
CLIC IP FB performance
factor 2 - 3 improvement
![Page 10: Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5681570d550346895dc4ae51/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Comments on L*
• Current CDR geometry:
time of flight IP BPM kicker IP ~ 24 ns
• Demonstrated FONT3 electronics latency = 13ns
• Estimated IPFB latency = 37ns
• In principle, change of L* need not affect IPFB position and latency, but needs to be engineered carefully, considering other beamline components
![Page 11: Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5681570d550346895dc4ae51/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
CLIC Final Doublet Region
11
![Page 12: Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5681570d550346895dc4ae51/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
FONT5 installation at ATF2
ATF2 extraction line
1212
![Page 13: Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5681570d550346895dc4ae51/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
IP kicker IPBPMs
FONT digital
FB
IPBPMelectronics
FONTamplifier
e-
ATF2 IP FB loop scheme
Eventual goal is to stabilise the small ATF2 beam (design 37nm)at the nanometer level
![Page 14: Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5681570d550346895dc4ae51/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Nanometer beam FB at ATF2 IP
• Much harder than IPFB at ILC or CLIC!
• Only 1 beam must measure beam position directly
• nm-level stabilisation requires nm-level position meas.
Cavity BPMs (rather than striplines)
• Cavities intrinsically slow, signal processing complicated
• Cavities required to resolve 2 bunches within << 300ns
Low-Q cavities and low-latency signal processing
New BPMs+electronics (KNU), new IP chamber (LAL)
![Page 15: Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5681570d550346895dc4ae51/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Layout with new IP kicker
Designed by Oxford
Fabricationarrangedby KEK
![Page 16: Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5681570d550346895dc4ae51/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
IP kicker IPBPMs
FONT digital
FB
IPBPMelectronics
FONTamplifier
e-
Preparatory tests June 2013
Existing IPBPMs
Honda low-latency electronics
![Page 17: Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5681570d550346895dc4ae51/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Preparatory test setup
A B
![Page 18: Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5681570d550346895dc4ae51/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Preparatory test IPFB loop
Analogue Front-end
BPM processor
FPGA-based digital processor
Kicker drive amplifier
Strip-line kicker
Beam
Cavity BPM
18
![Page 19: Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5681570d550346895dc4ae51/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
IP Feedback Results
FB Off Jitter: 170 ± 10 nmFB On Jitter: 93 ± 4 nm
FB Off Correlation: 81%
19
![Page 20: Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5681570d550346895dc4ae51/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
IP Feedback Results
FB Off Jitter: 170 ± 10 nmFB On Jitter: 93 ± 4 nm
FB Off Correlation: 81%
FB On Correlation: -16%20
![Page 21: Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5681570d550346895dc4ae51/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Incoming Beam Position Scan
10 μm pos. scan
Bunch 2
![Page 22: Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5681570d550346895dc4ae51/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
IP BPM resolution
• Beam size during measurements ~ 100 nm
• Model beam jitter ~ 20% of beam size, i.e. 20nm
• Assuming results are resolution limited …
• Resolution = 93 nm / sqrt(2) ~ 65 nm
(no direct resolution measurement possible)
![Page 23: Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5681570d550346895dc4ae51/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
New IP chamber installed summer 2013
Commissioning Started November:alignment, BPM signals
![Page 24: Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5681570d550346895dc4ae51/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
11cm Low-Q IP-BPM design
11cm Low-Q IP-BPM drawings of HFSS
100mm
100mm
Sensor cavity
Wave guideAntenna
Designed frequencyX-port: 5.712 GHzY-port: 6.426 GHz
Full size : 11cmx11cm (to
install IP-Chamber)Light weight:
1 kg (Single cavity)2 kg (Double cavity)
![Page 25: Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5681570d550346895dc4ae51/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
In May tests resumed w. Honda electronics
FF quad current scan to set vertical beam waist at IPB
![Page 26: Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5681570d550346895dc4ae51/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
In May tests resumed w. Honda electronics
Centre beam in BPM using mover optimise resolution
![Page 27: Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5681570d550346895dc4ae51/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
In May tests resumed w. Honda electronics
Centre beam in BPM using mover optimise resolution
![Page 28: Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5681570d550346895dc4ae51/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Summary
• ATF2 IPFB prototype is progressing
• Beam stabilised (June 2013) to ~ 100nm level
• Beam jitters measured (June 2014) ~ 60nm (best)
• Beam studies continue until June 20th
• Attempting to disentangle jitter/resolution
• Looking at boosting signal levels resolution
• Hope to close FB loop with improved resolution