feeder cattle market grades joshua b. elmore, pas advisor iii, natural resource programs auburn...

37
Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

Upload: april-butterworth

Post on 31-Mar-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

Feeder Cattle Market Grades

Joshua B. Elmore, PASAdvisor III, Natural Resource Programs

Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

Page 2: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

Feeder Cattle Standards are :

• Common trade language between buyers and sellers.

• A tool for penning cattle at officially graded sales.

• Used to certify feeder cattle grades for futures contracts.

• Basis for federal-state livestock market news reporting.

Page 3: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

U.S Standards for Grades of Feeder Cattle

• Grow rapidly and efficiently

• Produce a carcass with acceptable quality and high cutability.

• Adequate frame • Body capacity

• High lean to fat ratio up to market weight

• Muscle without excess fat

• Thrifty• Healthy• Acceptable structural

correctness

Page 4: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

Growth and Development of Bone, Muscle and Fat

Choice

Page 5: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

• The standards describe the various types of feeder cattle being produced and are used as a basis for market reporting and as a common trade language between buyers and sellers.

• Updated October of 2000 to reflect changes in the genetic composition, production, marketing and management of beef cattle.

U.S Standards for Grades of Feeder Cattle

Page 6: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

U.S Standards for Grades of Feeder Cattle

• Feeder Cattle are evaluated by a combination of :– Frame Size– Muscling

Page 7: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

Frame SizesLarge

Medium

Small

Page 8: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

U.S Standards for grades of Feeder Cattle

• Under ordinary development and feeding conditions, different framed animals reach slaughter potential at different weights.

Page 9: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

Frame Size- Large

• Tall and long bodied• ½ inch fat:• Steers finish > 1250 lbs• Heifers finish > 1150 lbs

Page 10: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

Frame Size- Medium

• Slightly tall• Slightly long bodied• ½ inch fat:• Steers finish 1100 to 1250 lbs• Heifers finish 1000 to 1150 lbs

Page 11: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

Frame Size- Small

• Not as tall as Medium• Short bodied• ½ inch fat:• Steers finish < 1100 lbs• Heifers finish < 1000 lbs

Page 12: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

USDA/MRP/AMS

Page 13: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

USDA/MRP/AMS

Page 14: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

USDA/MRP/AMS

Page 15: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

15

Evaluating Frame Size

Flank to Flank

Hi

p

Height Chest to

Ground

Page 16: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

Frame Size – Relative to maturity

• Length of tail

• Coarseness of hair in switch

• Width of muzzle

• Coarseness of hair on poll

• Size of feet, ears, base of horns, etc.

Page 17: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

BIF Frame Score Measurement

Page 18: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

BIF Frame Score Chart

Age(months)

BIF Frame Score (inches)

4 5 6

Bulls Heifers Bulls Heifers Bulls Heifers

6 40.8 40.3 42.9 42.3 44.9 44.4

205 Days 42.1 41.2 44.1 43.3 46.1 45.3

8 43.2 42.1 45.2 44.1 47.2 46.2

10 45.3 43.7 47.3 45.7 49.3 47.7

365 Days 47.0 45.0 49.0 47.0 51.0 49.0

14 48.5 46.1 50.4 48.0 52.4 50.0

16 49.6 49.6 51.6 49.9 53.6 50.8

18 50.5 47.5 52.4 49.5 54.4 51.4Source: Beef Improvement Federation’s Guidelines for Uniform Beef Improvement Programs, 8th Edition.

Page 19: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

The Relationship of USDA Size and BIF Frame Scores

USDA Frame Size BIF Frame Score

Large Equal to or > 6

Medium 4 and 5

Small Equal to or < 3

Page 20: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

USDA/MRP/AMS

USDA Feeder Cattle Grades

Muscle Thickness Scores

No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4

Page 21: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

Anatomy

Stifle

Forearm

Loin Back

Stifle

Gaskin

Page 22: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

Evaluation of Muscling

• The basic shape of the hindquarter as viewed from behind.

No. 1 Muscling No. 3 Muscling

Page 23: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

USDA/MRP/AMS

USDA Feeder Cattle Grades

Muscle Thickness Scores

No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4

Page 24: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

#1 Muscling

• Moderately thick throughout, showing a rounded appearance through the back and loin with moderate width between the legs.

Page 25: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

#1 Muscling

• Moderately thick throughout, showing a rounded appearance through the back and loin with moderate width between the legs.

1++ 1--

Page 26: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

• Slightly thick throughout; showing a rounded appearance through the back and loin with slight width between the legs.

#2 Muscling

Page 27: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

• Slightly thick throughout; showing a rounded appearance through the back and loin with slight width between the legs.

#2 Muscling

2++ 2--

Page 28: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

• Thin through the forequarter an the middle part of the rounds; back and loin have a sunken appearance; legs are set close together.

#3 Muscling

Page 29: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

• Thin through the forequarter an the middle part of the rounds; back and loin have a sunken appearance; legs are set close together.

#3 Muscling

3++ 3--

Page 30: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

• Less thickness than the minimum requirements for # 3.

#4 Muscling

Page 31: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

Muscle Grades

# 1 # 2 # 3 # 4

Page 32: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

Inferior Grade

Mismanaged – Disease/ Parasites Double muscled animals

Page 33: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

33

Possible Feeder Cattle Grades Large Frame #1,#2,#3 or #4

Medium Frame #1,#2,#3 or #4

Small Frame #1,#2,#3 or #4

Inferior – This grade will include sick unthrifty cattle and double muscled cattle due to their inability to Quality grade.

Page 34: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

• Weight– Accuracy and

completeness for selection

• Frame Size– Finish early and at a

lighter weight– Earlier maturity at

desired fat thickness•Muscle Thickness at a given fatness is highly correlated with muscle to bone ratio.

Page 35: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

Target Weights to Reach USDA Choice

USDA Frame Score Steers HeifersLarge 1,250 lbs. 1,150 lbs.Medium 1,100 to 1,250 lbs. 1,000 to 1,150 lbs.Small <1,100 lbs. <1,000 lbs.

Page 36: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

USDA/MRP/AMS

Page 37: Feeder Cattle Market Grades Joshua B. Elmore, PAS Advisor III, Natural Resource Programs Auburn University Animal Sciences Department

USDA/MRP/AMS