fem simulation of 2d mosfet

1

Upload: davide-resnati

Post on 18-Dec-2015

59 views

Category:

Documents


10 download

DESCRIPTION

Carried out with COMSOL 5.0

TRANSCRIPT

  • March 17TH, 2014 Andrea CuccatoDecember 3RD, 2012 Andrea CuccatoFriday, March 13, 2015

    2D FEM simulation of a MOS

    Field Effect Transistor

    Ph.D. Course:

    Numerical Methods for Electromagnetics

    Authors:

    Davide RESNATI

    Francesco CECCARELLI

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Summary

    Problem description

    Performed simulations

    Numerical issues and solutions

    Localized charge effects

    Short channel effects

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Summary

    Problem description

    Performed simulations

    Numerical issues and solutions

    Localized charge effects

    Short channel effects

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Metal Oxide Semiconductor Transistor

    PLANAR NMOS TRANSISTOR:

    Metal Oxide Silicon structure

    Low bulk p-doping (~1017cm-3)

    High source and drain n-doping (~1020cm-3)

    WORKING PRINCIPLE:

    In equilibrium drain and source are electrically

    disconnected (n+-p-n+

    junction)

    VG =0V < VT

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Metal Oxide Semiconductor Transistor

    PLANAR NMOS TRANSISTOR:

    Metal Oxide Silicon structure

    Low bulk p-doping (~1017cm-3)

    High source and drain n-doping (~1020cm-3)

    WORKING PRINCIPLE:

    In equilibrium drain and source are electrically

    disconnected (n+-p-n+

    junction)

    When the gate potential is raised above a threshold value VT a high electron concentration is induced near the oxide, connecting

    source and drain (n+-n-n+ junction)

    VG =1.4V > VT

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    COMSOL mathematical model

    =

    Si=

    q

    Si p + ND n NA)

    1

    q = U

    1

    q = U

    oxide

    silicon

    SEMICONDUCTOR MODEL:

    Stationary condition assumed

    Non-linear Poisson equation for electrostatics computation

    Hole and electron continuity equations for currents computation

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    COMSOL mathematical model

    SEMICONDUCTOR MODEL:

    Stationary condition assumed

    Non-linear Poisson equation for electrostatics computation

    Hole and electron continuity equations for currents computation

    2 =

    ox

    oxide

    silicon

    OXIDE MODEL:

    Stationary condition assumed

    Homogeneous Poisson equation for electrostatics computation

    No continuity equations (no carriers)

    =

    Si=

    q

    Si p + ND n NA)

    1

    q = U

    1

    q = U

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Boundary conditions

    A

    B C

    DEF

    G H

    On AB CD:

    = 0

    = 0

    = 0

    oxide

    silicon

    SEMICONDUCTOR BOUNDARY:

    Insulation on lateral surface

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Boundary conditions

    pn = nieff2

    p n + Nd+ Na

    = 0

    = V

    A

    B C

    DEF

    G H

    = 0

    = 0

    = 0

    On AB CD: On AF DE BC :

    oxide

    silicon

    SEMICONDUCTOR BOUNDARY:

    Insulation on lateral surface

    Ohmic metal contact for source, drain and bulk terminals

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Boundary conditions

    = 0

    A

    B C

    DEF

    G H

    On GF HE:

    oxide

    silicon

    OXIDE BOUNDARY:

    Zero charge on lateral surface

    SEMICONDUCTOR BOUNDARY:

    Insulation on lateral surface

    Ohmic metal contact for source, drain and bulk terminals

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    = VG

    A

    B C

    DEF

    G H

    = 0On GF HE:

    On GH :

    oxide

    silicon

    OXIDE BOUNDARY:

    Zero charge on lateral surface

    Fixed gate potential

    SEMICONDUCTOR BOUNDARY:

    Insulation on lateral surface

    Ohmic metal contact for source, drain and bulk terminals

    Boundary conditions

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Boundary conditions

    OXIDE BOUNDARY:

    Zero charge on lateral surface

    Fixed gate potential

    SEMICONDUCTOR BOUNDARY:

    Insulation on lateral surface

    Ohmic metal contact for source, drain and bulk terminals

    INTERFACE:

    Insulator interface, with continuous electric potential

    and displacement

    = = 0

    0+ = 0)

    =0+

    =

    =0

    On FE :

    A

    B C

    DEF

    G Hoxide

    silicon

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Summary

    Problem description

    Performed simulations

    Numerical issues and solutions

    Localized charge effects

    Short channel effects

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    ID-VG static characteristics

    Source and substrate grounded (V=0), drain biased at VDD=3.3V

    Voltage sweep on gate terminal

    Current evaluation on drain terminal

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    ID-VG static characteristics

    VT

    Source and substrate grounded (V=0), drain biased at VDD=3.3V

    Voltage sweep on gate terminal

    Current evaluation on drain terminal

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    ID-VG static characteristics

    VT

    Source and substrate grounded (V=0), drain biased at VDD=3.3V

    Voltage sweep on gate terminal

    Current evaluation on drain terminal

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    ID-VD static characteristics

    Source and substrate grounded (V=0), gate biased at VG =1.4V > VT

    Voltage sweep on drain terminal

    Current evaluation on drain terminal

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    ID-VD static characteristics

    Source and substrate grounded (V=0), gate biased at VG =1.4V > VT

    Voltage sweep on drain terminal

    Current evaluation on drain terminal

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    ID-VD static characteristics

    Source and substrate grounded (V=0), gate biased at VG =1.4V > VT

    Voltage sweep on drain terminal

    Current evaluation on drain terminal

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Summary

    Problem description

    Performed simulations

    Numerical issues and solutions

    Localized charge effects

    Short channel effects

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Mesh design

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Mesh design

    oxide

    silicon

    Finer mesh

    corresponding with

    abrupt n+-p

    junctions (source

    and drain)

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Mesh design

    silicon

    oxideFiner mesh

    corresponding with

    abrupt n+-p

    junctions (source

    and drain)

    Finer mesh in the

    channel region

    (superficial

    current)

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Mesh design

    Finer mesh

    corresponding with

    abrupt n+-p

    junctions (source

    and drain)

    Finer mesh in the

    channel region

    (superficial

    current)

    silicon

    oxide

    Refinement

    at the drain-

    channel

    junction

    (high fields)

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Numerical approaches

    Finite Volume Method

    Inital guess: Carriers and potential@ equilibrium:

    p-doped silicon:

    p = Na

    n =ni

    2

    NaV = Ef

    n-doped silicon:

    n = Nd

    p =ni

    2

    NdV = Ef

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Numerical approaches

    Finite Volume Method

    Inital guess: Carriers and potential@ equilibrium:

    p-doped silicon:

    p = Na

    n =ni

    2

    NaV = Ef

    n-doped silicon:

    n = Nd

    p =ni

    2

    NdV = Ef

    Direct discretization of the conservation law:

    1

    =

    , c={p,n}

    Solution from FVM used as initialguess for successive voltage

    sweeps computed with FEM

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Numerical approaches

    Finite Volumes,

    0th order base

    functions

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Numerical approaches

    Finite Volumes,

    0th order base

    functions

    Finite Elements,

    1st order base

    functions

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Numerical approaches

    Finite Volumes,

    0th order base

    functions

    Finite Elements,

    1st order base

    functions

    Finite Elements,

    2nd order base

    functions

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Numerical approaches

    Finite Volumes,

    0th order base

    functions

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Numerical approaches

    Finite Volumes,

    0th order base

    functions

    Finite Elements,

    1st order base

    functions

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Numerical approaches

    Finite Volumes,

    0th order base

    functions

    Finite Elements,

    1st order base

    functions

    Finite Elements,

    2nd order base

    functions

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Numerical approaches

    Different localbehaviour, but

    almost identical

    global behaviour

    in standard

    operation

    conditions

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Summary

    Problem description

    Performed simulations

    Numerical issues and solutions

    Localized charge effects

    Short channel effects

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Localized charge effects

    Localized charges are caused by defects in the oxide

    Electrostatic interaction of trapped electrons with the channel strongly

    impacts the threshold voltage of

    the MOS structure

    silicon

    oxide

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Localized charge effects

    Localized charges are caused by defects in the oxide

    Electrostatic interaction of trapped electrons with the channel strongly

    impacts the threshold voltage of

    the MOS structure

    Simplified modeling of charge traps:

    bulk trap: closed shape in the oxidewith a surface charge condition:

    =

    silicon

    oxide

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Localized charge effects

    Localized charges are caused by defects in the oxide

    Electrostatic interaction of trapped electrons with the channel strongly

    impacts the threshold voltage of

    the MOS structure

    Simplified modeling of charge traps:

    bulk trap: closed shape in the oxidewith a surface charge condition:

    =

    surface trap: segment of the silicon-oxide interface with a surface charge

    condition

    silicon

    oxide

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Localized charge effects

    The trapped charge lowersthe potential at the silicon

    surface

    exponential variation of electron concentration and

    of current density

    surface charge

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Localized charge effects

    The same amount of charge induces a higher threshold

    shift if it is closer to the

    channel Higher VT

    The trapped charge lowersthe potential at the silicon

    surface

    exponential variation of electron concentration and

    of current density

    surface charge

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Higher VT

    Localized charge effects

    The same amount of charge induces a higher threshold

    shift if it is closer to the

    channel

    The trapped charge lowersthe potential at the silicon

    surface

    exponential variation of electron concentration and

    of current density

    Problems in deep-subthreshold regimes (low

    carrier concentrations)

    surface charge

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Summary

    Problem description

    Performed simulations

    Numerical issues and solutions

    Localized charge effects

    Short channel effects

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Short channel effects

    Very large scale integrated MOSFETs are of paramount importance today

    Constant field scaling (Dennard et al. 1974) implies reducing voltages

    (reduction of VT, compatibility)

    =,,

    =

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Short channel effects

    Very large scale integrated MOSFETs are of paramount importance today

    Constant field scaling (Dennard et al. 1974) implies reducing voltages

    (reduction of VT, compatibility)

    =,,

    =

    Voltages are less scaled than the dimensions

    short channel effects =

    , >

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Short channel effects

    Very large scale integrated MOSFETs are of paramount importance today

    Constant field scaling (Dennard et al. 1974) implies reducing voltages

    (reduction of VT, compatibility)

    =,,

    =

    Voltages are less scaled than the dimensions

    short channel effects =

    , >

    NUMERICAL REMARKS:

    The mesh has been defined in a scalable way, so that it is not necessary to change it

    Sweeping on a geometry parameter is very challenging because every step can not use the previous solution as initial guess

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    LOCAL POINT OF VIEW:

    Lateral contributions increase their influence on the channel

    electrostatics when the channel

    length is shrinking (channel is

    controlled also by the drain)

    The potential barrier seen by electrons between source and

    drain is lowered

    Short channel effects

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    LOCAL POINT OF VIEW:

    Lateral contributions increase their influence on the channel

    electrostatics when the channel

    length is shrinking (channel is

    controlled also by the drain)

    The potential barrier seen by electrons between source and

    drain is lowered

    GLOBAL POINT OF VIEW:

    The threshold is lower than the one in a long channel device Current with zero biased gate

    increase exponentially;

    Subthreshold slope of the curve degrades Worse Ion/Ioff ratio

    Short channel effects

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    An MOS Field Effect Transistor (MOSFET) model has been developed using COMSOL Multiphysics 5.0

    Several numerical issues have been faced and solved (electrical current conservation, minority carriers concentration, etc...).

    Unfortunately numerical problems are often trade-offs between

    computational speed and solution accuracy

    The model has been verified and used in two realistic cases, in order to study the effects produced by localized charges in the

    oxide or by scaling the channel length

    Conclusions

  • Friday, March 13, 2015

    Conclusions

    Thank you for

    your attention