fertility in india trends and prospects€¦ · annual tfr decrease, tamil nadu, based on 3 year...
TRANSCRIPT
POPULATION REFERENCE BUREAU | www.prb.org
Fertility in India Trends and ProspectsCarl HaubPopulation Reference Bureau [email protected]
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
Map not to scale
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
Population Distribution of India by State, 2001
Maharashtra9.4%
West Bengal7.8%
Andhra Pradesh7.4%
Tamil Nadu6.1%
Other states33.7%
Uttar Pradesh16.2%
Bihar8.1%
Madhya Pradesh5.9%
Rajasthan5.5%
2001 Census of India
“EAG” states =
40% of population
2007 TFR >3.0 states =
42% of population
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
Total Fertility Rate, India and Major States, 2007
2.7
3.9 3.9
3.4 3.43.1
2.7 2.6 2.62.4
2.32.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.9
1.7 1.6
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
INDIA
Uttar P
radesh
BiharRaja
sthan
Madhya P
radesh
Chhattisgarh
Assam
Haryana
Gujarat
Orissa J&K
Karnata
kaMah
arashtraDelh
iPunjab
West Ben
gal
Himach
al Prad
esh
Andhra Prad
esh
Kerala
Tamil Nadu
Sample Registration System
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
Percent of Population Urban, India, 1901 - 2001
10.9 10.311.2
12.0
13.9
17.3 18.0
19.9
23.3
25.7
27.8
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1901
1911
1921
1931
1941
1951
1961
1971
1981
1991
2001
Censuses of India
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
Total Fertility Rate, India and Major States, Rural and Urban, 2007
3.0
4.2 4.1
3.7 3.73.5 3.4
2.9 2.9 2.82.5
2.0
3.12.9
2.62.3 2.2 2.1
1.5
2.2 2.3
1.7
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
INDIA
Uttar P
radesh
Bihar
Rajasth
anMad
hya Prad
eshJh
arkhan
dChhattis
garh
Assam
Gujarat
Haryana
Orissa
RuralUrban
Sample Registration System
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
Total Fertility Rate, India and Major States, Rural and Urban, 2007 - con’t
2.52.3 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.9
1.7 1.71.5
1.7 1.8 1.8
1.41.6
1.41.7
1.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
J&K
Karnata
ka
Mahara
shtra
Punjab
West Ben
galAndhra
Prades
hHim
achal
Prades
h
Kerala
Tamil Nadu
RuralUrban
Sample Registration System
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
Total Marital Fertility Rate, India, Total, Rural, and Urban, 1998 and 2007
4.64.4
4.84.5
4.23.9
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
India 1998, National TFR = 3.2 India 2007, National TFR = 2.7
TotalRuralUrban
Sample Registration System
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
Total Marital Fertility Rate, India and Major States, Rural and Urban, 2007
4.5
5.7
4.85.1 5.0
5.2 5.1
5.8
4.2 4.3 4.23.9
5.7
3.84.0 4.0 3.9
4.7
4.03.6
4.4
3.8
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
INDIA
Uttar P
radesh
Rajasth
anMad
hya Prad
eshJh
arkhan
dChhattis
garh
Bihar
Assam
Gujarat
Haryana
Orissa
RuralUrban
Sample Registration System
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
Total Marital Fertility Rate, India and Major States, Rural and Urban, 2007 - con’t
5.3
4.2
3.4
4.4
3.6 3.5
4.8
3.74.0
3.2
4.03.7 3.7
4.1
3.2 3.3
4.7 4.6
3.9 3.9
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
J&K
Karnata
kaMah
arashtra
PunjabWest
Bengal
Andhra Prad
esh
Himach
al Prad
esh
Kerala
Tamil Nadu
Delhi
RuralUrban
Sample Registration System
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
Uttar Pradesh Bihar KeralaPopulation 2001 (millions) 166 83 32Population 2009 196 97 34 Literacy Male/Female (%), 2001 69/42 60/33 94/88 Total fertility rate, 2007 3.9 3.9 1.7Modern contraceptive prev. ‘07-08 26.7 28.4 53.1Traditional contra. prev. ‘07-08 11.4 3.6 9.0Urban population (%), 2001 21 10 26Percent of population < age 15, 2001 41 42 26Households with electricity (%) ‘07-08 38 10 70HH with access to toilet facility, ‘07-08 26 17 97HH in permanent-type house, 2001 53 41 68 HH, with television, 2001 25 9 39 HH with car, jeep, or van, 2001 2.2 0.9 4.0 HH with two-wheeler, 2001 10.4 3.6 10.0 HH in one-room house, 2001 30 43 11 HH with low standard of living, ‘07-08 64 80 92001 Census of India, District Level Health Survey, 2007-2008, and PRB projections
The “Demographic Divide” in Three States of India
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
UTTAR PRADESH: 2001 CensusReported Population, by Age and Sex------------------------ --------------------------- ---------------------------Age Male Female Female minus Sex------------------------ --------------------------- --------------------------- Male Ratio All ages 87,563,471 78,631,176
0-4 10,791,490 10,021,978 -769,512 1.0775-9 13,205,699 11,795,908 -1,409,791 1.12010-14 12,041,869 10,367,597 -1,674,272 1.16115-19 9,018,223 7,098,006 -1,920,217 1.27120-24 7,007,116 6,363,864 -643,252 1.10125-29 6,009,187 5,835,437 -173,750 1.03030-34 5,364,259 5,497,795 133,536 0.97635-39 5,100,187 4,751,820 -348,367 1.07340-44 4,334,189 3,748,960 -585,229 1.15645-49 3,468,288 3,200,143 -268,145 1.08450-54 3,027,280 2,330,914 -696,366 1.29955-59 1,992,036 2,121,263 129,227 0.93960-64 2,274,377 2,036,975 -237,402 1.11765-69 1,474,525 1,445,036 -29,489 1.02070-74 1,258,532 991,321 -267,211 1.27075-79 500,502 446,838 -53,664 1.120
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
0-4
5-9
10-14
15-19
20-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65-69
70-74
75-79
80+
Population Pyramid of Uttar Pradesh, 2001 Census, Unsmoothed
2001 Census of India
Age
Males Females
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
0-4
5-9
10-14
15-19
20-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65-69
70-74
75-79
80+
Females
Population Pyramid of Uttar Pradesh, 2001 Census, Smoothed
2001 Census of India, smoothed
Age
Percent
Males
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
10
15
20
25
30
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Births per 1,000 population
Crude Birth Rate, India, 2000 - 2008
Registrar General of India, Sample Registration System
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
Have States Shown a Tendency for a Slowdown in TFR Decline As an “Ultimate Level” is Reached?
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
Crude Birth Rate, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh, 1971 - 2008
0
10
20
30
40
50
1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007
Uttar PradeshRajasthan
Sample Registration System
Births per 1,000 population
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
Crude Birth Rate, Bihar and Jharkhand, 1971 - 2008
0
10
20
30
40
50
1971
1973
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
BiharJharkhand
Sample Registration System
Births per 1,000 population
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
Crude Birth Rate, Madhya Pradesh & Chhattisgarh 1971 - 2008
0
10
20
30
40
50
1971
1973
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
Madhya PradeshChhattisgarh
Sample Registration System
Births per 1,000 population
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
0
1
2
3
4
5
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
BiharUttar Pradesh
Children per woman
Total Fertility Rate, Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, 2000 -2007
Registrar General of India, Sample Registration System
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Uttar PradeshKarnataka
Children per woman
Total Fertility Rate, Karnataka and Uttar Pradesh, Three Year Moving Averages, 1971-1973 to 2005-2007
Sample Registration System
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
Annual TFR Decrease, Kerala, Based on 3 Year Moving Average 1972-1974 to 2005-2007
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
1973
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
Sample Registration System
TFR = 2.1
TFR = 4.0
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
Annual TFR Decrease, Tamil Nadu, Based on 3 Year Moving Average 1972-1974 to 2005-2007
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
1973
1976
1979
1982
1985
1988
1991
1994
1997
2000
2003
2006
1989
1992
1995
1998
2001
2004
Sample Registration System
TFR = 2.1
TFR = 3.9
TFR = 1.7
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
Annual TFR Decrease, Karnataka, Based on 3 Year Moving Average 1972-1974 to 2005-2007
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
1973
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
Sample Registration System
TFR = 2.1
TFR = 4.2
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
Annual TFR Decrease, West Bengal, Based on 3 Year Moving Average, 1982-1984 to 2005-2007
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005Sample Registration System
TFR = 2.1
TFR = 4.1
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
Annual TFR Decrease, Uttar Pradesh, Based on 3 Year Moving Average, 1972-1974 to 2005-2007
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005Sample Registration System
TFR = 4.1
TFR = 6.5
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
Annual TFR Decrease, Maharashtra, Based on 3 Year Moving Average, 1972-1974 to 2005-2007
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005Sample Registration System
TFR = 2.1
TFR = 4.2
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
Contraceptive Use by Currently Married Women, Ages 15-49 Modern and Traditional Methods, India, Four Surveys
27.3
3.1 2.44.3
34.2
6.8
3.15.0
34.3
5.4 4.87.3
37.3
4.9 5.27.8
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
1992-1993DHS
1998-1999DHS
2002-2003
DLHS
2005-2006DHS
F. Sterilization.
Pill, IUD
Injectable
Condom
Traditional
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
Contraceptive Use by Currently Married Women, Ages 15-49 Modern and Traditional Methods, Bihar, Four Surveys
21.6
1.5
22.4
1.6
28.9
3.0
28.4
3.6
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1992-1993NFHS-1
1998-1999NFHS-2
2005-2006NFHS-3
2007-2008DLHS-3
(Ages 15-44)
Modern
Traditional
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
Contraceptive Use by Currently Married Women, Ages 15-49 Modern and Traditional Methods, Uttar Pradesh, Four Surveys
18.5
1.3
22.0
5.7
29.3
14.3
26.7
11.4
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1992-1993NFHS-1
1998-1999NFHS-2
2005-2006NFHS-3
2007-2008DLHS-3
(Ages 15-44)
Modern
Traditional
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
Contraceptive Use by Currently Married Women, Ages 15-49 Modern and Traditional Methods, Rajasthan, Four Surveys
30.9
0.9
38.1
1.9
44.4
2.8
54.0
2.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1992-1993NFHS-1
1998-1999NFHS-2
2005-2006NFHS-3
2007-2008DLHS-3
(Ages 15-44)
Modern
Traditional
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
60.3 56.7 53.846.1 45.1 41.3 40.5
33.725.6 25.0 24.6
16.5
5.05.1
6.116.2
11.18.4
16.539.0
21.4
7.4 10.321.9
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Andhra
Prades
hKarn
ataka
Tamil N
adu
Kerala
Madhya
Prad
esh
Chhatt
isgarh
Rajasth
anWes
t Ben
gal
Orissa
BiharJh
arkha
ndUtta
r Pra
desh
Other methodsFemale sterilization
Percent of Currently Married Women, Ages 15-44, Using Female Sterilization and Using Other Methods, Selected States of India, 2007-2008
DLHS-3
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
46
6460 58
5653 53 52 51
41 41 4038 38 35
2522
17 16 14
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
INDIA
BiharJh
arkhan
dRaja
sthan
Andhra Prad
esh
West Ben
gal
Madhya P
radesh
Uttar P
radesh
Chhattisgarh
Haryana
Karnata
kaMah
arashtraAss
amOris
saGujar
atTamil N
aduPunjabKera
la
Jammu &
Kash
mir
Himach
al Prad
esh
Percent of Women, Ages 18-29, Married by Age 18, Major States of India, 2005-2006
NFHS-3
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
21
20 20 2020 20 20 20 20 21 21
21 21 2121
22 22 22
2323
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
INDIA
Bihar
Andhra Prad
esh
Rajasth
anHary
anaChhattis
garhUtta
r Prad
eshWest
Bengal
Karnata
kaJh
arkhan
dOris
saAss
amMah
arashtra
Gujarat
Madhya P
radesh
Tamil Nadu
Himach
al Prad
esh
PunjabKera
la
Jammu &
Kash
mir
Median Age of Women at Effective Marriage, All Ages, India and Major States, 2007
NFHS-3Sample Registration System
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
64.2
64.6
63.4
61.2
55.4
47.4
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
45-49
40-44
35-39
30-34
25-29
20-24
Percentage of Women, Ages 20-49, Married Before Age 18, by Age, India 2005-2006
NFHS - 3
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
2623 24 25 25 25
26 26 26 26 26 26 27 27 27 27 27 27 28 28
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
INDIA
Andhra Prad
esh
Karnata
kaWest
Bengal
Mahara
shtraTamil N
adu
Himach
al Prad
esh
Haryana
Orissa
Madhya P
radesh
Chhattisgarh
Gujarat
Kerala
Rajasth
anJh
arkhan
dPunjabAss
amBihar
Jammu &
Kash
mir
Uttar P
radesh
Median Age at Sterilization of Women, India and Major States, 2005-2006
NFHS-3
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
1.2
2.6
2.11.8 1.9
1.3
1.7
4.0
3.6 3.5
2.9
2.5
2.12.3
0
1
2
3
4
No formaleducation
Belowprimary
Primary Middle Class X Class XII Graduate &above
Andhra PradeshUttar Pradesh
Sample Registration System
Total Fertility Rate by Level of Education of Women Ages 15-49, 2007
Per cent
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
Percent of Married Women, Ages 15-49, with Two Children Who Want No More, District Level Health Surveys, Selected States of India
62
70
4650
3642 41
36
46
3439
43
33
80 79
6358 56 56 56 56
5146 46 44 44
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
West Ben
galTamil N
adu
Kerala
Orissa
Uttar P
radesh
Madhya P
radesh
Rajasth
anUtta
r Prad
eshKarn
ataka
Chhattisgarh
Jhark
hand
Andhra Prad
esh
Bihar
2002-032007-08
DLHS-1 and -3
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
1419 20
3637
6672
61
87 90
41
73
88
64
8995
57
76
88
62
8995
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
No sons 1 son 2 sons No sons 1 son 2 sons
One living childTwoThreeFour
Demographic and Health Surveys
Currently Married Women, Ages 15-49, Who Want No More Children by Number of Living Children and Number of Living Sons, India, NFHS-1 and NFHS-3
Per cent
NFHS-1, 1992-93 NFHS-3, 2005-06
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
Sex Ratio at Birth in Poorest-performing States of India, 1999-2001 to 2005-2007
700
750
800
850
900
950
1,000
1999-01 2000-02 2001-03 2002-04 2003-05 2004-06 2005-2007
PunjabHaryanaRajasthanGujaratHimachal Pradesh
Registrar General of India, Sample Registration System
Children per woman
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
Sex Ratio at Birth in Medium-performing States of India, 1999-2001 to 2005-2007
700
750
800
850
900
950
1,000
1999-01 2000-02 2001-03 2002-04 2003-05 2004-06 2005-2007
Uttar PradeshBiharMaharashtraAndhra PradeshAssam
Registrar General of India, Sample Registration System
Children per woman
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
Sex Ratio at Birth in Best-performing States of India, 1999-2001 to 2005-2007
700
750
800
850
900
950
1,000
1999-01 2000-02 2001-03 2002-04 2003-05 2004-06 2005-2007
Madhya PradeshKeralaKarnatakaWest BengalOrissaTamil Nadu
Registrar General of India, Sample Registration System
Children per woman
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
Some Observations and Questions
SRS birth rates are coming down.
While birth rates are coming down, many large states are still in the middle of their fertility transition.
Is the glass half empty or half full? Is a family size of two children “in the cards” for the EAG states and other higher-fertility states?
If sex-selective abortion is successfully prohibited is a two child family likely?
Cultural and societal values vary greatly across the country.
What may hold true in one state may not in another.
Village in Uttar Pradesh
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.org
Some Observations and Questions - con’t
The effectiveness of grass-roots programs such as NRHM is highly dependent on the cooperation of state governments.
Will the very low TFRs observed in the south rise as affluence rises?
Should subnational projections of large countries with varying TFRs be run and then aggregated to the national level?
Would the above be worth the effort?
Opinions in India regarding TFR prospects in UP, etc., see TFRs of 2.1 or lower as a “distant dream.”
But, to repeat, SRS birth rates are declining.Village in Tamil Nadu
© 2009 Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. www.prb.orgThank You