field experience, research and national policies contributing to global climate efforts –...

15
Field experience, research and national agriculture policies contributing to global climate efforts - FAO-MICCA Programme results Martial Bernoux, Maria Nuutinen & Janie Rioux Mitigation of Climate Change in Agriculture (MICCA) Programme, FAO Side event: Sustainable agriculture and land use enhancing climate action and increasing productivity EU Pavilion, COP22, Marrakech, 11 November 2016

Upload: maa-ja-metsaetalousministerioe

Post on 22-Jan-2018

143 views

Category:

Government & Nonprofit


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Field experience, research and national agriculture policies contributing to global

climate efforts

- FAO-MICCA Programme results

Martial Bernoux, Maria Nuutinen & Janie Rioux

Mitigation of Climate Change in Agriculture (MICCA) Programme, FAO

Side event: Sustainable agriculture and land use enhancing climate action and increasing productivity

EU Pavilion, COP22, Marrakech, 11 November 2016

• SBSTA: FAO calls for a holistic approach for agriculture sectors

• Contributing jointly to food security, adaptation and resilience as well as reducing and removing GHG emissions

• MICCA Programme (since 2011)

• has found ways to addressing climate change in smallholder farming systems,

• has made an impact at the national & global levels.

Boy running from peat fire, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia

Photo: Alue Dohong

Context

FAO & SDG: End hunger & support countries in achieving food security and improve nutrition.Objective: Make agriculture sectors (crop, livestock, forestry, fisheries and aquaculture) more productive and sustainable

MICCA country-work approach

• Work through partnerships: Integrate the Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA) approach into on-going development activities

• Context-specific!

• 3 dimensions: food security, adaptation & GHG emission reductions

• Test and demonstrate the synergies and trade-offs

• Provide quantifiable evidence on CSA to and work with farmers, national and local decision makers and international organizations and donors

• Development and research partner organizations have disseminated the project’s messages and integrated its findings and lessons into their own work

4

Field activities

1. Developing menus of practices with farmers

2. Implementation through gender-sensitive farmer field schools

3. Developing research methodology

4. Evaluation: adoption & benefits

5. Upscaling: Sharing results with policy makers and other project staff.

www.fao.org/in-action/micca/

6

Piloting CSA in 2 countries

MICCA Pilot Project in KenyaIntegrated crop-livestock system of Western Kenya

Improving milk yield and income of dairy producers while reducing the climate change “footprint” of dairy production systems

MICCA Pilot Project in United Republic of TanzaniaCereal-based family farming in the highlands

Combining conservation agriculture practices with agroforestry, improved cook-stoves, and soil and water conservation to improve yield and livelihoods and reduce burning, erosion and deforestation

7

Field results in Kenya

• Adoption of improved fodder grasses was associated with farm size, number of livestock, and labor availability.

• Agroforestry adoption was associated with secured land tenure.

• The price of milk in the wet season influences both the planted fodder crops and agroforestry.

• Participation in trainings increased significantly the adoption of improved fodder, agroforestry, composting, and tree nursery.

93% 89% 88%

41% 39%

9%1%

0

20

40

60

80

100

AgroforestryPlanted

Fodder Planted ManureCollected

Tree Nursery onfarm

FeedConservation

Composting Biogas

%A

do

pti

on

35% of farmers adopting the

practices were women

8

Field results in Tanzania

• Insecure land tenure and small land size were barriers to adoption of agroforestry and soil-water conservation measures

• Availability of labor and capacity to hire labor were incentives for uptake of double digging and crop rotation, as these practices are labor demanding.

• Access to information, farmer to farmer learning and trainings were determinants of adoption for all practices

75%

50%40%

15%6%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

Tree planting ICS SWC Tree nursery 2 CA

2 practices of conservation agriculture combining min. tillage, mulching and cover crops

9

MICCA’s scaling-up and impact to larger processes at the national

level

10

Results of Field Experiences

Policy support was mainly focusedon Kenya, the United Republic ofTanzania and Viet Nam.

NAMA preparedness projects in Kenya (dairy livestock) and Vietnam (rice and energy)

MICCA’s Focus areas: Policies

Promoting gender aspects of the climate change work to ensure sustainability

MICCA’s Focus areas

• Guidebooks, videos and learning materials prepared andwidely disseminated on a large variety of topics, including:• livestock value chain GHG emission estimation, sustainable

management of peatlands, and• Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs).

• The project has focused on the main GHG emission sources in agriculture sectors, including livestock, land use change and peatlands.

• MICCA: 11 online Communities of Practice (CoPs) were established, with 11 000 members from at least 130 countries: learning and exchanging information, increasing innovation & uptake of sustainable agriculture and land use.

MICCA is much more

14

Take-home messages

1. Work together with smallholder farmers

• Building context specific menus of practices

2. Combine traditional and indigenous knowledge with latest research results, climate models

3. Take into account gender throughout the steps

4. Monitor the impact

• easy tools available e.g. for GHG emission reduction estimations

5. Build viable and alternative livelihood sources

6. Invest in knowledge-sharing and partnerships.

MICCA and partners thank its donors!

Thank you for your attention

www.fao.org/in-action/micca